华为 P10 智能手机简短评测

Name: Huawei P10
Brand: Huawei

请下一位！ 十大于九——华为在P10的设计中很好地实现了这个理念。更快的处理器，更大存储空间，更大电池容量，还有更优秀的相机。它的设计更加圆润，指纹识别器也移到了机身正面。尽管没有重要革新，但华为P10没有暴露出明显的弱点。

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 04/08/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P10 (P10 Series)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 960 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G71 MP8

Memory

4 GB

, LPDDR4

Display

5.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕，10点触控，指关节触控, LTPS, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 49.66 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最高支持 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距感应器，霍尔感应器，加速感应器，位置和重力感应器，计步器，数字指南针, BeiDou, OTG, Wifi Direct, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (频段 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 12 (频段 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 38, 40 和 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.98 x 145.3 x 69.3

Battery

3200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 华为 SuperCharge, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 23 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 359 h

Operating System

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 20 MPix 2000万像素黑白 + 1200万像素RGB 徕卡双镜头 (Summarit-H 1:2.2/27毫米 ASPH, 整合变焦, 混合自动对焦, 光学防抖, 4K视频录制, 双色温LED闪光灯)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 徕卡镜头 (定焦)

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器，USB数据线，耳机，保护套，SIM卡工具，快速开始说明，质保卡, EMUI 5.1, 36 Months Warranty, USB-C, head SAR: 1.49 W/kg, body SAR: 0.54 W/kg, fanless

Weight

144 g, Power Supply: 102 g

Price

599 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	485 MBit/s +41%
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	343 (154^min) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s -2%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	185 MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	532 MBit/s +73%
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	308 (48.8^min) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s -9%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	279 MBit/s -9%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Huawei P10

LG G5

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P10

LG G5

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P10

LG G5

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Canon EOS 70D

The robin can hardly be recognized with the x10 zoom


602 cd/m²	553 cd/m²	523 cd/m²
604 cd/m²	547 cd/m²	519 cd/m²
589 cd/m²	550 cd/m²	521 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 604 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 556.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.39 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 547 cd/m²
Contrast: 1272:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.39

	Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1"	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Huawei P8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"	Apple iPhone 7 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	Sony Xperia XZ IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"
Screen		8%	3%	21%	31%	-8%	9%
Brightness middle	547	582 6%	453 -17%	350 -36%	556 2%	544 -1%	445 -19%
Brightness	556	563 1%	439 -21%	351 -37%	519 -7%	521 -6%	434 -22%
Brightness Distribution	86	91 6%	91 6%	98 14%	90 5%	93 8%	93 8%
Black Level *	0.43	0.38 12%	0.28 35%		0.34 21%	0.37 14%	0.36 16%
Contrast	1272	1532 20%	1618 27%		1635 29%	1470 16%	1236 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.8	4.4 8%	4.7 2%	2.04 57%	1.3 73%	5.8 -21%	2.8 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.8	7.4 16%		3.25 63%	2.6 70%	9.8 -11%	5.8 34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.5	4.8 -7%	5.03 -12%	1.63 64%	1.9 58%	7.2 -60%	3.7 18%
Gamma	2.39 ^92%	2.2 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.07 ^106%	2.26 ^97%	2.18 ^101%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	7194 ^90%	6175 ^105%	7439 ^87%	6391 ^102%	6818 ^95%	8619 ^75%	7164 ^91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		77.78	72.04	86.86	63.15
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.44		99.35	99.71

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.6 ms rise
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	140084 Points
Huawei P9	95743 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7	142532 Points +2%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points -8%
Sony Xperia XZ	129317 Points -8%
HTC 10	131866 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 9	124087 Points -11%
OnePlus 3T	159866 Points +14%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	1935 Points
Huawei P9	1755 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1840 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 7	3490 Points +80%
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points -24%
Sony Xperia XZ	1647 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 9	1947 Points +1%
OnePlus 3T	1881 Points -3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	6036 Points
Huawei P9	4904 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	5503 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 7	5585 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points -35%
Sony Xperia XZ	3701 Points -39%
Huawei Mate 9	5629 Points -7%
OnePlus 3T	4236 Points -30%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	27692 Points
Huawei P9	19854 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28671 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7	37676 Points +36%
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XZ	28603 Points +3%
HTC 10	27176 Points -2%
Huawei Mate 9	27364 Points -1%
OnePlus 3T	30810 Points +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	35964 Points
Huawei P9	21577 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	33031 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7	63974 Points +78%
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points -26%
Sony Xperia XZ	32056 Points -11%
HTC 10	30061 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 9	35626 Points -1%
OnePlus 3T	34494 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	15341 Points
Huawei P9	15517 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	19610 Points +28%
Apple iPhone 7	15450 Points +1%
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points +37%
Sony Xperia XZ	20772 Points +35%
HTC 10	20344 Points +33%
Huawei Mate 9	15104 Points -2%
OnePlus 3T	22426 Points +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2649 Points
Huawei P9	1237 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points +2%
Apple iPhone 7	2964 Points +12%
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XZ	3275 Points +24%
HTC 10	3157 Points +19%
Huawei Mate 9	2367 Points -11%
OnePlus 3T	2577 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2816 Points
Huawei P9	1080 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points +7%
Apple iPhone 7	4057 Points +44%
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points +32%
Sony Xperia XZ	4522 Points +61%
HTC 10	4581 Points +63%
Huawei Mate 9	2448 Points -13%
OnePlus 3T	3310 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2193 Points
Huawei P9	2510 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points -9%
Apple iPhone 7	1525 Points -30%
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points -24%
HTC 10	1512 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 9	2123 Points -3%
OnePlus 3T	1452 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2274 Points
Huawei P9	974 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2204 (1923^min) Points -3%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XZ	2548 Points +12%
HTC 10	2495 Points +10%
Huawei Mate 9	2240 Points -1%
OnePlus 3T	2221 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2409 Points
Huawei P9	829 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2229 (2043^min) Points -7%
Lenovo Moto Z	2336 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XZ	2853 Points +18%
HTC 10	2889 Points +20%
Huawei Mate 9	2294 Points -5%
OnePlus 3T	2418 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	1902 Points
Huawei P9	2503 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2121 (1594^min) Points +12%
Lenovo Moto Z	1797 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points -12%
HTC 10	1688 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 9	2117 Points +11%
OnePlus 3T	1728 Points -9%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	55 fps
Huawei P9	43 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 7	57.7 fps +5%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps -4%
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps +60%
HTC 10	43 fps -22%
Huawei Mate 9	60 fps +9%
OnePlus 3T	59 fps +7%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	69 fps
Huawei P9	40 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 7	110.3 fps +60%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps +12%
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps +28%
HTC 10	73 fps +6%
Huawei Mate 9	80 fps +16%
OnePlus 3T	91 fps +32%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10	32 fps
Huawei P9	19 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 7	58.5 fps +83%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps -19%
Sony Xperia XZ	39 fps +22%
HTC 10	24 fps -25%
Huawei Mate 9	37 fps +16%
OnePlus 3T	45 fps +41%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	30 fps
Huawei P9	18 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 7	60.7 fps +102%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps +37%
Sony Xperia XZ	40 fps +33%
HTC 10	39 fps +30%
Huawei Mate 9	34 fps +13%
OnePlus 3T	46 fps +53%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	25 fps
Huawei P9	11 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps -40%
Apple iPhone 7	59.4 fps +138%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps -40%
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps +24%
HTC 10	14 fps -44%
Huawei Mate 9	28 fps +12%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +28%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10	24 fps
Huawei P9	10 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 7	42.2 fps +76%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps +13%
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps +29%
HTC 10	24 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 9	24 fps 0%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +33%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	7341 Points
Huawei P9	7058 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points -37%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XZ	5058 Points -31%
HTC 10	5809 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 9	7403 Points +1%
OnePlus 3T	5664 Points -23%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	6206 Points
Huawei P9	5226 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XZ	5616 Points -10%
HTC 10	4549 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 9	6299 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2621 Points
Huawei P9	2025 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 7	2999 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ	2165 Points -17%
HTC 10	2193 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 9	2772 Points +6%
OnePlus 3T	2218 Points -15%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P10	3830 Points
Huawei P9	3930 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 7	6097 Points +59%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ	3047 Points -20%
HTC 10	2806 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 9	3616 Points -6%
OnePlus 3T	3130 Points -18%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P10	2778 Points
Huawei P9	2627 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points -25%
Apple iPhone 7	1257 Points -55%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -21%
Sony Xperia XZ	1434 Points -48%
HTC 10	1772 Points -36%
Huawei Mate 9	3850 Points +39%
OnePlus 3T	1954 Points -30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10	4115 Points
Huawei P9	1583 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points -46%
Apple iPhone 7	6896 Points +68%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points +5%
Sony Xperia XZ	4716 Points +15%
HTC 10	5009 Points +22%
Huawei Mate 9	3939 Points -4%
OnePlus 3T	4444 Points +8%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10	1077 Points
Huawei P9	1029 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7	1531 Points +42%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ	1066 Points -1%
HTC 10	928 Points -14%
Huawei Mate 9	1076 Points 0%
OnePlus 3T	891 Points -17%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P10	23.56 fps
Huawei P9	7.9 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13.31 fps -44%
Lenovo Moto Z	24.33 fps +3%
Huawei Mate 9	19.14 fps -19%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	664 Points
Huawei P9	328 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	733 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 7	1322 Points +99%
Apple iPhone 7	1059 Points +59%
Lenovo Moto Z	542 Points -18%
HTC 10	608 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 9	699 Points +5%

Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P10	60.5 fps
Huawei P9	58.6 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	60 fps -1%
Lenovo Moto Z	59.8 fps -1%
Huawei Mate 9	60.5 fps 0%

Legend

Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10	136 Points
Huawei P9	128 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	163 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 7	202 Points +49%
Lenovo Moto Z	112 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ	90 Points -34%
HTC 10	108 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 9	152 Points +12%
OnePlus 3T	135 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10	1077 Points
Huawei P9	1029 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7	1531 Points +42%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ	1066 Points -1%
HTC 10	928 Points -14%
Huawei Mate 9	1076 Points 0%
OnePlus 3T	891 Points -17%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	10236 Points
Huawei P9	11783 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13191 Points +29%
Apple iPhone 7	24875 Points +143%
Lenovo Moto Z	7771 Points -24%
Sony Xperia XZ	9069 Points -11%
HTC 10	8905 Points -13%
Huawei Mate 9	11897 Points +16%
OnePlus 3T	9798 Points -4%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei P10	3129 ms *
Huawei P9	2923 ms * +7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2564 ms * +18%
Apple iPhone 7	1113 ms * +64%
Lenovo Moto Z	3155 ms * -1%
Sony Xperia XZ	2768 ms * +12%
HTC 10	3146 ms * -1%
Huawei Mate 9	2734 ms * +13%
OnePlus 3T	2719 ms * +13%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	57.9 Points
Huawei P9	68.4 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	75.1 Points +30%
Apple iPhone 7	165.9 Points +187%
Lenovo Moto Z	47.5 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ	54.2 Points -6%
HTC 10	52.1 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 9	68.6 Points +18%
OnePlus 3T	54.5 Points -6%

Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei P10	7346 Points
Huawei P9	6580 (6523^min) Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7198 (6255^min) Points -2%
Lenovo Moto Z	5344 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 9	7565 Points +3%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P10	Huawei P9	Lenovo Moto Z	Sony Xperia XZ	HTC 10	Samsung Galaxy S7	LG G5	ZTE Axon 7
AndroBench 3-5		-49%	-8%	-48%	-20%	-16%	-20%	-13%
Sequential Read 256KB	738	281.3 -62%	439.7 -40%	281 -62%	275.1 -63%	483.8 -34%	427.6 -42%	406.5 -45%
Sequential Write 256KB	189.8	72.2 -62%	168.3 -11%	138 -27%	115.6 -39%	145.7 -23%	141.3 -26%	150.9 -20%
Random Read 4KB	168.4	39 -77%	117.2 -30%	71.5 -58%	29.92 -82%	85.9 -49%	89.3 -47%	121.1 -28%
Random Write 4KB	152.3	47.45 -69%	74.9 -51%	10.5 -93%	15.89 -90%	16.01 -89%	16.22 -89%	16.22 -89%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	54.2	55 1%	78.5 45%	33.5 -38%	83.3 54%	72.3 33%	78.5 45%	78.4 45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	32.19	24.83 -23%	45.64 42%	29.8 -7%	65.4 103%	53.6 67%	45.53 41%	51.3 59%

Max. Load

Idle


44.6 °C	43.1 °C	43 °C
43.9 °C	43.1 °C	43.6 °C
42.6 °C	41.6 °C	42.6 °C

Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 43.1 °C


37.3 °C	38.4 °C	40.9 °C
37.2 °C	39.6 °C	40.5 °C
37.8 °C	39.4 °C	40.7 °C

Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 39.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.06 / 0.19 Watt
Idle	0.83 / 2.1 / 2.18 Watt
Load	6.57 / 9.32 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Huawei P9 3000 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 5s 3200 mAh
Power Consumption		16%	8%	34%	36%	-1%	20%
Idle Minimum *	0.83	0.77 7%	0.68 18%	0.68 18%	0.54 35%	1.31 -58%	0.4 52%
Idle Average *	2.1	2.36 -12%	1.49 29%	1.02 51%	1.51 28%	2.03 3%	1.7 19%
Idle Maximum *	2.18	2.37 -9%	1.91 12%	1.14 48%	1.54 29%	2.08 5%	1.81 17%
Load Average *	6.57	3.09 53%	7.4 -13%	4.73 28%	3.75 43%	5.45 17%	5.84 11%
Load Maximum *	9.32	5.35 43%	9.71 -4%	7.16 23%	5.01 46%	6.75 28%	9.12 2%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		25h 40min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 56min

	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Huawei P9 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	14%	-9%	-12%	-43%	9%
Reader / Idle	1540	1514 -2%	1810 18%	1770 15%	1273 -17%		1371 -11%
H.264	582	568 -2%	892 53%	722 24%	648 11%		724 24%
WiFi v1.3	966	569 -41%	456 -53%	517 -46%	413 -57%	546 -43%	407 -58%
Load	176	206 17%	242 38%	126 -28%	203 15%		320 82%

Pros

+ 经典设计，高品质材料

+ 高速处理器

+ 大容量UFS 2.1闪存

+ 高速LTE Cat.12支持，频段覆盖广

+ 支持混合变焦的优秀相机

+ 不错的电池续航

+ 可扩展存储空间

+ 不错的扬声器

+ 最长3年质保

+ 快速充电

+ 优秀的屏幕...

Cons

- ...但很遗憾分辨率仅1080p

- 屏幕机身面积比有所退步

- 预装软件过多

- 无线模组ac制式速度慢

- microSD读卡器速度慢

- 不支持MHL或SlimPort

- 负载下降频

In review: Huawei P10 (VTR-L09). Review sample courtesy of Huawei.

华为再一次带来了一款出色的产品，P10智能手机几乎无懈可击。和它同系列的P10 Plus版本才是真正的旗舰机型。不过，这款尺寸稍小的型号也搭载了一些一流的功能，如UFS 2.1闪存，LTE Cat.12网络模组，和极速Kirin 960处理器，配置相似的设备价位都相对更高。

我们也十分喜欢它的徕卡双镜头相机，尽管在技术上它还有改进的空间，不过已经可以拍摄品质超高的照片。内置的人像模式十分优秀，可以提供独特的景深效果。它的电池续航也得到了改进。

华为P10是一台成功的更新，优秀的相机和改进的电池续航都可以让人心服口服。

不过，考虑到它是一台高端设备，华为P10还有一些技术上的小瑕疵。相对较弱的无线网络模组，缓慢的microSD读卡器和仅全高清的屏幕都不太符合P10的价位。索尼今年已经搭配了超高清屏幕和HDR功能，而LG G6也得到了支持HDR的屏幕。华为需要在下次更新时提供这些功能。

在用户服务方面，华为也做的很好。VIP服务可以将质保延长到三年，这不仅为用户提供了方便，也显示出了华为对自家设备品质的信心。华为再一次带来了一款优势众多的高端智能手机，很好地延续了前代机型的优秀表现。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Huawei P10 - 07/11/2017 v6 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

71 / 75 → 94%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

51 / 60 → 84%

Weight

93%

Battery

95%

Display

87%

Games Performance

58 / 63 → 92%

Application Performance

58 / 70 → 83%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

78%

Average

80%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为 P10 智能手机简短评测

Daniel Schmidt, 2017-04- 8 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

华为 P10 智能手机简短评测

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Huawei P10 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison