Notebookcheck Logo

华为P50 Pro评测--智能手机中的相机参考脱颖而出

对于爱好者来说。

华为P50 Pro是该系列中第一款使用高通SoC的智能手机,但除此之外它完全专注于摄影。新的徕卡相机保证了高图像质量,P50 Pro在其他方面也要提供很多东西。另一方面,5G和谷歌服务继续缺失。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

不久前,华为P系列还是今年最受期待的智能手机之一。但随着中国和美国之间的贸易战,这家制造商不被允许使用谷歌的服务,无法生产自己的芯片组,甚至在其旗舰智能手机中也不得不不使用5G。

在这些困难的情况下,P50 Pro试图重新获得其早期的领先地位,并捍卫其自我选择的 "摄影奇迹 "的标签。在这次测试中,我们将了解它是否能在这些挑战中取得成功。

Huawei P50 Pro (P50 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.60 inch 19.8:9, 2700 x 1228 pixel 393 PPI, capacitive, 300 Hz touch sampling rate, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 236.59 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Card Reader: NanoMemory Card up to 256 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, color spectrum, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 28, 29, 40, 41, 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 158.8 x 72.8
Battery
4360 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm) + 64 MPix (3.5x optical zoom, f/3.5, 90 mm) + 13 MP (ultra wide angle, f/2.2, 13 mm) + 40 MP (monochrome, f/1.6, 23 mm); aspect ratio (photo): 4:3, 1:1, 19.8:1; Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: onscreen, 66W charger, USB cable, SIM tool, EMUI 12, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.49/1.12 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
195 g, Power Supply: 137 g
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
88.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Huawei P50 Pro
SD 888 4G, Adreno 660
195 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2700x1228
89.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2020
Huawei P40 Pro
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
209 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.58"2640x1200
87.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
90.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
203 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
89.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2021
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
200 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080

华为P50 Pro比起它的 P40 Pro尽管电池容量增加了。它的显示屏侧面呈圆形,看起来非常纤细,拿在手里感觉很舒服。在德国只提供可可金和金黑颜色的版本。

这款智能手机的做工非常好。正面和背面都由某种玻璃覆盖,没有给出规格。华为智能手机可以抵御任何扭曲的尝试,而没有显示出任何反应的迹象。缝隙紧密且非常均匀,只有在仔细观察时,你才能注意到玻璃和框架之间的缝隙在背面的角落里略大。

此外,华为P50 Pro提供了IP68认证,所以它是防尘和防水的。电池是内置的,不能由用户更换。卡盘盖与边框平齐,也具有相同的颜色。

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g161.5 mm 75.6 mm 7.8 mm 200 g158.8 mm 72.8 mm 8.5 mm 195 g158.2 mm 72.6 mm 8.95 mm 209 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.65 mm 203 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备--华为P50 Pro配备齐全

通过USB 3.2(Gen. 1),华为P50 Pro不仅提供了非常快速的连接,而且还允许通过HDMI和DisplayPort连接进行有线显示输出,包括可选的桌面模式。支持为其他设备充电的Power Delivery,也支持OTG,使你能够连接外围设备。

虽然没有通知LED,但该智能手机提供了一个可选的永远在线显示屏。它还放弃了一个音频端口,你必须为USB端口单独购买一个相应的适配器。除了小米,华为也是少数几个在此时仍提供红外冲击器的制造商之一,允许你将其作为多媒体设备、空调或相机等的遥控器替代品。

SD卡阅读器

华为P50 Pro的存储可以通过NanoMemory卡扩展到256GB。虽然这很好,但华为内部的格式并不特别实惠。另一方面,传输速率相当好,而且还支持exFAT文件系统。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Huawei NanoMemory)
32.78 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Huawei P50 Pro; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø37.3 (28.1-59.1)
Huawei P50 Pro; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø84 (9.89-109)

软件--华为智能手机搭载Android 11和EMUI 12

华为P50 Pro配备了Android 11,但仍然不提供谷歌服务。制造商继续使用已知的EMUI用户界面,该界面在视觉上与中国使用的和谐操作系统没有区别。

虽然Android 版本不是最新的,但华为至少努力使安全补丁保持在相当高的水平。在我们的P50 Pro测试单元中,在测试时它们处于2022年1月1日的水平。

即使没有Google Play商店,你仍然可以在AppGallery中找到许多必要的应用程序,或者通过相应网站的花瓣搜索来安装它们。然而,后者有点麻烦,而且被许多安全通知打断。

虽然系统本身操作起来非常舒适,但那些不想把一切都交给自动更新的人,会不断地被一些问题淹没,毕竟他们不应该被激活。

主屏幕
快速菜单
设置
桌面模式

通信和GNSS - P50 Pro配备了Wi-Fi 6和LTE

华为P50 Pro的WLAN模块支持Wi-Fi 6(IEEE-802.11 a, b, g, n, ax),允许它在2.4以及5.0-GHz范围内进行通信。不幸的是,高通SoC似乎只支持VHT80,导致数据传输率比P40 Pro低。 P40 Pro之前。结合我们的华硕ROG GT-AXE1000参考路由器,传输速率甚至仍然低于标准的能力。

P50Pro最多可以使用LTE访问移动数据。频段覆盖非常广泛,可以在全球范围内进行连接。然而,华为的智能手机不支持5G。在测试过程中,接收特性并不明显。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1214 (516min - 1524max) MBit/s +83%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years)
725 MBit/s +9%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
663 (262min - 790max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1465 (1307min - 1536max) MBit/s +149%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years)
711 MBit/s +21%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
589 (287min - 679max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1544 (797min - 1619max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
747 (650min - 862max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
600 (305min - 657max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
698 (632min - 775max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
855 (827min - 886max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 (804min - 879max) MBit/s
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
821 (388min - 998max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
660 (599min - 698max) MBit/s
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (287-679)
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, ARM Mali-G76 MP16; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø808 (388-998)
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø663 (262-790)
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, ARM Mali-G76 MP16; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1517 (797-1619)

在户外,华为P50 Pro的卫星定位非常迅速和准确。支持大量的网络和频段。

在一次自行车旅行中,我们将智能手机的定位精度与Garmin Venu 2进行了比较。虽然P50 Pro不能毫无差错地记录所走的路线,但它仍然相对准确,并且相当频繁地记录其位置。这使得它非常适用于导航任务。

GNSS测试路线:环湖
GNSS测试路线:环湖
GNSS测试路线:转折点
GNSS测试路线:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:概述
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:概述

电话功能和语音质量

华为P50 Pro的通话特性在测试中是令人信服的。耳塞的语音质量非常好,周围的嘈杂声也得到了抑制,没有扭曲用户的声音。扬声器在安静的环境中听起来也很有吸引力,只有一些最小的轰鸣声。

支持VoLTE和WLAN通话,在系统设置中只能管理SIP账户。

照相机--强大的徕卡四轴相机

用P50 Pro拍摄的自拍
用P50 Pro拍摄的自拍

华为P50 Pro的前置摄像头的分辨率为1300万像素,能够使用眼球追踪的自动对焦。虽然记录是令人信服的,但在默认设置下,它们的特点是色彩非常强烈。特别是背景中的物体显得非常清晰。在人像模式下,这种情况不会发生,你可以选择使用虚化模式模糊背景,或以其他方式取代它。

然而,展示的是主摄像头,它总共由四个传感器组成,一个相位和一个对比度自动对焦。主传感器是一个50万像素的真彩相机,它能够使用光学图像稳定器(OIS)。此外,还有一个1300万像素的超广角镜头,以及一个6400万像素的长焦镜头,并配有OIS。后者可实现3.5倍光学变焦,10倍混合变焦,以及100倍最大数字变焦。如此强大的变焦水平的稳定效果相当好,但在移动时有轻微的延迟。支持你的手拿着手机总是更好。在30倍的变焦水平下,我们相当喜欢这些照片,它们仍然可以使用,这取决于目的。然而,往往一些中间级别,如5倍变焦,没有得到最佳校准,自动对焦在设置最佳对焦点时似乎有一些问题。图像的特点是对比度强,而且算法对边缘的锐化非常强烈。更高的变焦水平更像是一种噱头。

主传感器得益于新的华为XD镜头以及XD Fusion Pro图像引擎。凭借其双镜头,华为再次实现了强大的低光性能,但不再处于一个级别。在白天,照片的特点也是动态范围大,对比度清晰,色彩鲜艳。你可以使用前置和主摄像头以高达60FPS的超高清速度录制视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain CameraUltrawide Angle5x ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
7.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P50 Pro: 5.96 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 10.35 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.1 ∆E
27 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
36 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
36 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P50 Pro: 25.16 ∆E min: 12.77 - max: 45.69 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括66瓦的充电器

华为P50 Pro的包装盒包括一个模块化充电器(最大66瓦,USB-A),一条USB线(Type-A到Type-C),一个SIM卡工具,以及一个透明的硅胶保护套。另外,你还可以在华为商店购买其他配件,如外壳或充电器。.

保修期为24个月。

输入设备和操作--华为P50 Pro的固体生物识别技术

制造商通过一个额外的保护膜来保护华为P50 Pro的电容式触摸屏。它与实际显示屏的过渡略微太硬,而且保护膜的滑动特性也绝对不是最佳的。

华为内部的Celia键盘作为默认安装,但微软的SwiftKey在前几年也总是预装,继续在AppGallery中提供,你可以安装它,没有任何复杂的问题,就像其他布局。

在显示屏上有一个光学指纹传感器,用于生物识别安全。即使这不是一个超声波版本,它在测试中仍然显示出自己非常可靠,可以快速解锁P50 Pro,而且识别率很高。二维人脸识别的工作速度更快,其安全性应该通过一些人工智能算法来提高。

显示屏 - 准确的OLED面板,120赫兹

子像素结构
子像素结构

华为P50 Pro的显示屏只比前代产品的显示屏大一点,并使用了扩大的全高清分辨率。在纯白色图像下,通过激活的亮度传感器,亮度达到一个非常好的数值,高达790 cd/m²,但其他一些智能手机甚至可以变得更亮。在光线和黑暗区域均匀分布的情况下(APL50),最高可达到823 cd/m²。那些不想使用亮度传感器自动调节的人可以得到高达591 cd/m²的亮度。

刷新率可以达到120赫兹。你可以选择在设置中把它改为固定的120或60赫兹,或者系统可以在这个范围内自动调整它。

P50 Pro的OLED面板不断地使用直流调光,它应该以高达1440赫兹的速度运行,以尽可能最好的方式补偿OLED的闪动。然而,我们只测量了60赫兹。

767
cd/m²
780
cd/m²
790
cd/m²
753
cd/m²
765
cd/m²
788
cd/m²
748
cd/m²
762
cd/m²
784
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 790 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 770.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 765 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Huawei P50 Pro
OLED, 2700x1228, 6.6"
Huawei P40 Pro
OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6"
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-8%
3%
17%
-14%
Brightness middle
765
584
-24%
959
25%
1050
37%
814
6%
Brightness
771
576
-25%
977
27%
1058
37%
814
6%
Brightness Distribution
95
95
0%
96
1%
98
3%
97
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.1
8%
1.1
8%
1
17%
2
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.6
2.3
12%
3.1
-19%
2.4
8%
3.6
-38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
1.8
-20%
1.9
-27%
1.5
-0%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.16 102%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2.12 104%
CCT
6446 101%
6355 102%
6498 100%
6504 100%
6568 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在一个固定的变焦水平上的测量系列,有各种亮度设置
在一个固定的变焦水平上的测量系列,有各种亮度设置

那些对较小的sRGB色彩空间的再现已经足够的人,将得到一个非常准确的色彩再现,几乎完美的白平衡。在标准设置下,图像的饱和度更高、更冷。

灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.933 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.438 ms rise
↘ 0.495 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.058 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.448 ms rise
↘ 0.611 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外,华为P50 Pro做得很好,在最坏的情况下,反光的表面会变得有点烦人,这取决于观看角度。

视角的稳定性也是令人信服的。只有在非常陡峭的视角下,显示的内容才会被轻微的绿色面纱所覆盖。

户外活动
户外活动
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能--华为P50 Pro使用骁龙888

华为P50 Pro不再使用麒麟SoC,而是使用了 骁龙888 4G伴随着8GB工作内存的高通公司。华为的 Adreno 660用作图形单元。

我们在激活性能模式的情况下运行了我们的基准测试,该模式在默认情况下是停用的。在Geekbench基准测试中,差异变得很明显。在没有性能模式的情况下,单核性能下降了17%,而使用所有内核时的性能增加了6%以上。 另一方面,在GFXBench中,结果几乎保持不变。因此,我们建议将性能模式停用。一些可能的性能提高并不明显,只是功耗反而增加了。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1749 Points +58%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points +7%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
1109 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (1099 - 1109, n=3)
1105 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1100 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1092 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
779 Points -30%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4829 Points +44%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
3364 Points +1%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
3342 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (2944 - 3342, n=3)
3207 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
3204 Points -4%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3165 Points -5%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 21892, n=47, last 2 years)
8171 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6259 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4407 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (4326 - 4386, n=3)
4352 Points +1%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
4326 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points -100%
OpenCL Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 18407, n=42, last 2 years)
8129 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
7514 Points +57%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
4787 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (4754 - 4787, n=3)
4771 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4748 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
14107 Points +6%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
13274 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=198, last 2 years)
13154 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (11230 - 13274, n=3)
12134 Points -9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10958 Points +4%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
10539 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
9787 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (8769 - 10539, n=3)
9648 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
7773 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
7718 Points -27%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7286 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
31940 Points +102%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20842 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +25%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
15799 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
15358 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (12352 - 15799, n=3)
14452 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
9794 Points -38%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7905 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5718 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +3%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
4867 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (4222 - 4867, n=3)
4576 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4312 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4120 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2130 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
9322 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9149 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
8366 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 23762, n=164, last 2 years)
8210 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
8001 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (5094 - 9322, n=3)
7320 Points -21%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6508 Points -30%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5956 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
16221 Points +34%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13950 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 40163, n=164, last 2 years)
12348 Points +2%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
12120 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
11309 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
10913 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (9323 - 12120, n=3)
10883 Points -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6771 Points -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5728 Points +11%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
5156 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=164, last 2 years)
4746 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4378 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4150 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
4137 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (1751 - 5156, n=3)
3815 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1852 Points -64%
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9927 Points +72%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
9386 Points +63%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
5758 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5683 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
5668 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (4677 - 5758, n=3)
5384 Points -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3297 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=113, last 2 years)
2801 Points -51%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
11700 Points +98%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10384 Points +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=189, last 2 years)
7889 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6010 Points +2%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
5915 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5872 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (4542 - 5915, n=3)
5374 Points -9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3310 Points -44%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3059 Points +97%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2609 Points +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=195, last 2 years)
2172 Points +40%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
1555 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1500 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (1253 - 1555, n=3)
1434 Points -8%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2864 Points +96%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2513 Points +72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points +48%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
1463 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (1232 - 1463, n=3)
1381 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
974 Points -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
121 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
121 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
119 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
119 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)
86.6 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (60 - 121, n=3)
80.7 fps -33%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps -50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
425 fps +51%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
417 fps +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)
296 fps +5%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
281 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (202 - 281, n=3)
248 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
242 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
178 fps -37%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
119 fps +12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
117 fps +10%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
106 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
103 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)
76.1 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (49 - 106, n=3)
70.7 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps -43%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
59 fps -44%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
251 fps +90%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
229 fps +73%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)
175 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
161 fps +22%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
132 fps
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
118 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
109 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (73 - 132, n=3)
104 fps -21%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
103 fps +54%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
87 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
73 fps +9%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
67 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)
66.7 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52 fps -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (19 - 67, n=3)
44.3 fps -34%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
169 fps +225%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
151 fps +190%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)
124.3 fps +139%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
107 fps +106%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
75 fps +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (52 - 76, n=3)
63 fps +21%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
52 fps
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
56 fps +180%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +148%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
42 fps +110%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps +80%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31 fps +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (17 - 34, n=3)
23.7 fps +19%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
20 fps
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
95 fps +61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)
74.8 fps +27%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
71 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
62 fps +5%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (44 - 63, n=3)
55.3 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
45 fps -24%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
44 fps -25%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
64 fps +45%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
51 fps +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)
50.7 fps +15%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
44 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
44 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (30 - 44, n=3)
35.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
119 fps +72%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
92 fps +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)
84.9 fps +23%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
69 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
64 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (50 - 72, n=3)
63.7 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
54 fps -22%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
50 fps -28%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
44 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
42 fps +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years)
39.2 fps +26%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
31 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
27 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (20 - 31, n=3)
25.3 fps -18%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
23 fps -26%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
39 fps +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=208, last 2 years)
34.3 fps +37%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
34 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
27 fps +8%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
25 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (20 - 27, n=3)
24 fps -4%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps -24%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
800608 Points +1%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
793997 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (784775 - 793997, n=2)
789386 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
743221 Points -6%
AImark - Score v2.x
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
226728 Points +3253%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
105536 Points +1461%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73666 Points +989%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
72572 Points +973%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
6762 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  ()
6762 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
6550 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (5722 - 6550, n=3)
6179 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6144 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5839 Points -11%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5589 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
0 Points -100%
System
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
10727 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
10492 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (10078 - 10727, n=3)
10363 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points -7%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9782 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
9119 Points -15%
Memory
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
7081 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (6493 - 7081, n=3)
6885 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
6248 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6246 Points -12%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6038 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points -28%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points +16%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
15464 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (14837 - 15539, n=3)
15280 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
14636 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
13588 Points -12%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10138 Points -34%
Web
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points +7%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1629 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points +1%
Huawei P50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
1567 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1501 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1486 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
  (967 - 1567, n=3)
1363 Points -13%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
181.6 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
70 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
66.3 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
413.7 Points +292%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
147.5 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
117.8 Points +12%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
116.6 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G (105.5 - 110.3, n=2)
107.9 Points +2%
Huawei P50 Pro (Huawei Browser 12)
105.5 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
243 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
85.8 runs/min
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
71.8 runs/min
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
248 Points +116%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points +31%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points +3%
Huawei P50 Pro (Huawei Browser 12)
115 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G (101 - 115, n=2)
108 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
102 Points -11%
Huawei P40 Pro
Points -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
64222 Points +181%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +69%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
28247 Points +24%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
23690 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G (21748 - 26010, n=3)
23536 Points +3%
Huawei P50 Pro (Huawei Browser 12)
22851 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
1914 ms * -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G (1835 - 1938, n=2)
1887 ms * -3%
Huawei P50 Pro (Huawei Browser 12)
1835 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
1744 ms * +5%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +17%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * +28%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
413.6 ms * +77%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P50 ProHuawei P40 ProXiaomi 12 ProSamsung Galaxy S21+Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
35%
7%
13%
24%
Sequential Read 256KB
1836
1775
-3%
1620
-12%
1623
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
755
395.7
-48%
1465
94%
1037
37%
Random Read 4KB
269.3
228.1
-15%
324.9
21%
309.6
15%
Random Write 4KB
329.6
271.8
-18%
448.9
36%
283.3
-14%

排放--华为也无法管理888个SoC

温度

华为P50 Pro的表面温度在怠速运行时保持较低。虽然它们在恒定负载下会增加,但智能手机只在某些区域变得手热。

在3DMark Wild Life的压力测试中,我们看到短时间内性能已经下降了近50%,所以它的表现几乎与 Galaxy S21 FE.但这是在没有激活性能模式的情况下。如果它被激活,P50 Pro在20次运行中的18次之后就会过热,并中断测试。在这段时间里,我们测量的表面温度高达41.7°C(107°F),这完全没有理由让人担心。然而,性能下降本身就很明显,足以在高要求的游戏中造成一些停滞。

Max. Load
 35 °C34.5 °C32.2 °C 
 35.1 °C34.8 °C32.2 °C 
 34.1 °C33.8 °C32.4 °C 
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
31.1 °C32.9 °C32.7 °C
30.4 °C32.5 °C33.4 °C
30 °C30.4 °C34 °C
Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 31.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
99.8 % +87%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
81.2 (47.5min) % +52%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.8 (3805min) % +23%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.3 (18.9min) %
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 (27.4min) % -11%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
70.7 (13.1min) % +21%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.2 (5.47min) %
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
05101520253035Tooltip
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø6.26 (5.47-9.41)
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø5.44 (5.09-9.07)
Huawei P50 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.2 (18.9-35.5)
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.6 (20-34.1)

发言人

华为P50 Pro的两个扬声器产生了相对平衡的声音,你甚至可以听到一点点的低音。在较高的音量下,高音略微过于突出,但除此之外,华为智能手机听起来很好,特别是在较中等的音量下。

虽然没有音频端口,但你可以选择购买USB-C端口的相应适配器。对于蓝牙,可用的音频编解码器只有SBC、AAC和LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203539.4253028.43121.922.84022.826.15034.839.76324.325.38023.221.810027.830.412514.741.916020.955.720021.253.225017.554.831513.461.540014.159.550013.162.463011.566.280013.169.6100011.769.5125011.873.116001375.5200012.175.6250012.177.5315012.377.7400012.575.850001374.8630013.272.580001371.81000013.771.41250013.5701600014.255.6SPL25.186.4N0.765.2median 13.1median 69.6Delta1.58.835.229.521.723.918.623.721.727.73232.325.728.127.428.624.328.916.334.618.947.117.55112.354.315.759.911.660.811.863.812.463.911.66912.573.913.177.712.578.513.177.412.87812.880.312.978.913.37613.477.913.774.213.771.814.464.213.756.225.288.90.774.2median 13.1median 71.81.511.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P50 ProSamsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P50 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 华为智能手机,4360毫安时

消耗功率

特别是在空闲运行时,功耗会增加,但在调整后的150cd/m²的亮度下,它略低于 Galaxy S21 FE它使用相同的SoC。

华为P50 Pro支持高达66瓦的有线充电和高达50瓦的无线充电。还支持反向无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.24 / 2.14 / 2.2 Watt
Load midlight 3.95 / 10.45 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P50 Pro
4360 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
3095 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21+
4800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
29%
17%
39%
14%
3%
5%
Idle Minimum *
1.24
0.92
26%
0.94
24%
0.51
59%
0.74
40%
1.285 ?(1.24 - 1.33, n=2)
-4%
Idle Average *
2.14
1.41
34%
1.24
42%
1.54
28%
1.27
41%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
1.47
33%
1.34
39%
1.57
29%
1.33
40%
Load Average *
3.95
3.35
15%
5.7
-44%
3.06
23%
6.32
-60%
Load Maximum *
10.45
6.37
39%
8.12
22%
4.59
56%
9.61
8%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G: Ø5.84 (1.303-11.6)
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø6.17 (1.767-12)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.5 (10.1-11)
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (10.6-13.1)
Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.426 (1.377-1.524)
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.567 (1.467-1.827)

电池寿命

在调整显示亮度(150cd/m²)的现实WLAN测试中,华为P50 Pro持续时间不到10小时。在这种情况下,它停止运行的时间要比 P40 Pro尽管拥有更大的电池。我们已经观察到类似的行为,在P50 Pocket.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (HuaweiBrowser 12)
9h 50min
Huawei P50 Pro
4360 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
3095 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21+
4800 mAh
Battery Runtime
26%
30%
68%
10%
WiFi v1.3
590
743
26%
766
30%
993
68%
651
10%
Reader / Idle
1474
2036
2614
1780
H.264
1137
788
1493
1174
Load
198
337
333
282

Pros

+ 准确的120-Hz OLED显示屏
+ 良好的摄像头
+ 防尘和防水
+ 带图像输出的USB 3.2
+ 良好的语音质量
+ 存储空间可扩展...

Cons

- ...但只支持NM卡
- 负载下性能下降
- 既不支持5G也不支持Wi-Fi 6E
- 只支持少数蓝牙音频编解码器
- 没有谷歌服务

评语 - 不是每个人都喜欢的

测试华为P50 Pro。测试装置由德国华为提供。
测试华为P50 Pro。测试装置由德国华为提供。

在硬件方面,华为P50 Pro是一款非常成功的智能手机,只有首次整合高端snapdragon没有获得最佳成功。这可以从相当中庸的电池寿命和平庸的散热等方面看出。

在积极的一面,我们看到一个准确的120-Hz显示屏和一个非常好的相机设置。此外,华为提供了IP68认证,快速无线和有线充电,以及良好的语音质量。

华为P50 Pro是一款非常好的智能手机,但它缺乏一些功能特性,而这些特性在目前的价格级别中是习惯性的。

贸易禁运的影响在P50 Pro上变得比它的前辈更明显。在显示亮度方面,华为远远落后于竞争对手。此外,该面板无法将刷新率降低到60赫兹以下。也没有5G和Wi-Fi 6E,你必须在没有aptX编解码器的情况下才能做到。

对于那些正在寻找一款拥有强大摄像头的优质智能手机,并且不介意缺乏谷歌服务或根本不需要这些服务的人来说,P50 Pro可能是一个有吸引力的选择。如果你不想在没有5G的情况下,看一下 前代产品此外,小米12 Pro也值得一看。 小米12 Pro或新的Galaxy S22系列也是强大的竞争对手。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

华为P50 Pro可从华为全球在各个欧洲、非洲和亚洲国家。在美国,你可以从亚马逊购买它,起价为$1024.

Huawei P50 Pro - 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
66 / 70 → 94%
Weight
88%
Battery
88%
Display
93%
Games Performance
56 / 64 → 88%
Application Performance
81 / 86 → 94%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
83%
Average
83%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为P50 Pro评测--智能手机中的相机参考脱颖而出
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-03-20 (Update: 2022-03-20)