谷歌Pixel 6a评测--强大的中端智能手机，但显示屏较小的缺陷

Name: Google Pixel 6a
Brand: Google

最实惠的Pixel。

小巧的6.1英寸谷歌Pixel 6a的速度非常快，并提供了也许是智能手机中档产品中最好的摄像头。此外，它的得分是明亮的AMOLED显示屏，良好的电池寿命，以及长时间的更新。然而，特别是Android 13智能手机的显示屏可能会引起一些混合的感觉，正如我们的测试所示。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/25/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen

Pixel 6a是谷歌Pixel 6阵容中最实惠的智能手机。相较于 Pixel 6 Pro和 Pixel 6，制造商对Pixel 6a的野心不大。除了6.1英寸的外形尺寸更小、更紧凑之外，我们还可以从几个设备特性中看到这一点。例如，Pixel 6a只提供60Hz显示屏，塑料后盖，6GB而不是8GB内存，以及12MP而不是50MP摄像头。

另一方面，Pixel 6a和它的兄弟姐妹机型提供相同的性能。随着 Tensor芯片，Pixel 6a包含与Pixel 6和Pixel 6 Pro完全相同的5纳米SoC，这确保了其高性能。

Test device courtesy of Google Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 6a (Pixel 6 Series)

Processor

Google Tensor 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Exynos X1 / Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G78 MP20

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

6.10 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 429 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, Gorilla Glass 3, always-on display, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 110 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, barometer, eSIM, Google Cast, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1,2,4,5,6,8,19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/32/38/39/40/41/42/48/66/71), 5G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/25/28/30/40/48/66/71/77/78), Head SAR 0.99 W/kg, Body SAR 1.31 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 152.2 x 71.8

Battery

4410 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.7, 1.4 µm, 1/2.55", 77° FOV) + 12 MP ultra wide angle camera (f/2.2, 1.25 µm, 114° FOV), video recording up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, 1.12 µm, fixed focus, 82° FOV, video recording up to 1080p@30fps)

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, USB adapter (Type-C to A), SIM tool, quick start guide, warranty information, 24 Months Warranty, IP67 rating, AR Core, fanless, waterproof

Weight

178 g

Price

459 Euro

Links

Google homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
85.8 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Google Pixel 6a Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	178 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2400x1080
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core	144 g	64 GB SSD	4.70"	1334x750
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Google Pixel 6 Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	207 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
85.3 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Motorola Moto G200 5G SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660	202 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	2460x1080
85.6 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Nothing Phone (1) SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L	193.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy A53 Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
87.7 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Xiaomi 12 SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	179 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080

外壳 - 高质量、轻质，并通过IP67认证

谷歌Pixel 6a的屏幕对角线为6.1英寸，属于紧凑型智能手机，重量为178克（约6.28盎司），非常轻。尽管有塑料后盖，但Pixel 6a的质感不亚于其更昂贵的兄弟姐妹机型。它的设计与像素6和 Pixel 6 Pro的设计相同，但摄像头的凸起明显更平坦。

这款谷歌智能手机的做工和触觉都非常好。在测试中，我们的翘曲尝试无法让同样符合IP67标准的防尘防水的Pixel 6a产生任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音或其他反应，即使使用了一些力量。电源键和音量摇杆的边框有一些晃动，但也提供了一个清晰的压力点。AMOLED显示屏受到Gorilla Glas 3的保护。在所有的颜色版本中，正面和背面都由哑光的黑色铝框连接。

谷歌为Pixel 6a提供了白色（白垩色）、绿色（鼠尾草色）和黑色（炭灰色）三种颜色。这实际上是一种双色设计，因为摄像头凸起部分的色调略有不同，而摄像头凸起部分始终是黑色的，并从外壳上突出约1毫米（约0.04英寸）。在我们的白色测试装置中，顶部呈现出较深的白色，而绿色和黑色版本在该区域略微浅一些。由于摄像头的凸起横跨整个后盖的宽度，当它被放在一个平面上时，智能手机不会晃动。

尺寸比较

设备--Pixel 6a的6GB内存和128GB存储空间

谷歌Pixel 6a提供6GB的LPDDR5-RAM和128GB的UFS-3.1存储，因此它的工作内存比Pixel 6a少2GB。像素6和 Pixel 6 Pro.由于它缺乏一个microSD插槽，所以你无法扩展内部存储。用户还必须在没有3.5毫米音频端口的情况下生活，这一点在Pixel 5a的设备中仍然包含，同样，也没有通知LED、红外辐射器或无线电接收器。

除了蓝牙5.2和NFC，Pixel 6a还包括一个快速的USB-C端口，以USB 3.1 Gen 1的速度运行，支持USB OTG。其中一个立体声扬声器放在USB-C端口旁边，第二个隐藏在显示屏顶部的一个小凹槽后面。

软件 -Android 13和长期更新的保证

通过谷歌的Pixel智能手机，用户可以获得一个纯粹的Android 。此外，还有一些Pixel独有的功能，如Material You设计、使用相机实时翻译，以及直接在开始和锁定屏幕上显示通知和其他有用信息的Live显示屏。

长时间的升级和新Android 版本的快速供应是Pixel 6a强大的购买理由。根据支持网站，谷歌希望为其经济型智能手机提供升级，至少到2025年7月，Android 安全补丁至少到2027年7月。

Pixel 6a在9月的更新中获得了Android 13，这也使Android 安全补丁达到了9月1日的水平--在我们测试时，更多的电流将无法实现。

通信和GNSS - 大量的频段和快速的Wi-Fi 6E

由于其高水平的频段支持，包括28个4G频段和17个5G频段，你几乎可以用Pixel 6a在任何地方连接到网络。然而，欧盟国家提供的G1AZG型号在5G方面仅限于Sub6区域，而美国Verizon提供的GB62Z型号还额外支持毫米波，可以实现更快的数据传输。

通过Wi-Fi 6E，三款Pixel 6智能手机中最小的一款支持最新的WLAN标准。结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，它为中端智能手机实现了非常高的传输速率，也非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	897 (449^min - 907^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 (763^min - 898^max) MBit/s -5%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	746 (599^min - 768^max) MBit/s -17%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=189, last 2 years)	717 MBit/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	345 (328^min - 351^max) MBit/s -62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (459^min - 973^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	888 (869^min - 906^max) MBit/s -6%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	757 (380^min - 826^max) MBit/s -20%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=191, last 2 years)	733 MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	269 (255^min - 281^max) MBit/s -72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1945, n=79, last 2 years)	1451 MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1407 (872^min - 1714^max) MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (926^min - 951^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1751 (879^min - 1776^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=79, last 2 years)	1385 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	598 (517^min - 731^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	864 (759^min - 906^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	802 (421^min - 857^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	895 (870^min - 907^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	836 (809^min - 863^max) MBit/s

Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, ARM Mali-G78 MP20; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (449-907)

Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, ARM Mali-G78 MP20; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø894 (870-907)

Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, ARM Mali-G78 MP20; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø931 (459-973)

Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, ARM Mali-G78 MP20; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø788 (421-857)

为了定位，Pixel 6a使用GPS（L1）、GLONASS（L1）、Galileo（E1）、QZSS（L1）和BeiDou（B1）卫星导航服务。在我们的测试中，卫星定点成功的速度非常快。在启动GPS测试应用程序后，智能手机已经显示出GNSS信号，然后在室内定位我们的位置，精确度高达4米（约13英尺）。在室外，定位也同样迅速成功，精确度高达3米（约10英尺）。

在我们的小型自行车之旅中，Pixel 6a与Garmin Venu2健身追踪器进行了比较，结果显示它非常适用于导航任务。尽管智能手表提供了更准确的位置信息，但除了一些小的异常值外，智能手机记录的路线也同样准确。

电话功能和语音质量

Pixel 6a有空间容纳一张Nano SIM卡。除了物理SIM卡外，你还可以将eSIM与智能手机连接起来。支持VoLTE和WLAN电话。

在我们的测试中，Pixel 6a产生了良好的语音质量。举起听筒，通话时声音听起来很自然，噪音抑制也做得很好。另一方面，在扬声器模式下，谷歌智能手机的说服力较差。虽然声音仍然清晰可懂，但它们听起来相当沉闷。

相机 - 属于中档次的最佳产品

最小的Pixel 6比其更昂贵的兄弟姐妹机型使用其他相机传感器。在主摄像头中，Pixel 6a没有使用强大的5000万像素的三星ISOCELL GN1，而是使用了较老的1200万像素的索尼IMX363，这已经用于像素5, 像素4和 Pixel 3.超广角摄像头（索尼IMX386）也提供1200万像素的分辨率。自拍相机（索尼IMX355）的分辨率为800万像素，能产生良好的自拍效果。

尽管Pixel 6a没有提供任何高端传感器，但相机软件还是尽力发挥索尼芯片的全部潜力。其结果确实值得一看，因为你目前在中端市场上很难找到更好的图像质量。

在良好的光线条件下，主摄像头拍摄的照片清晰，对比度丰富，色彩鲜艳自然，动态范围大，令人印象深刻。即使在弱光条件下，其记录性能也明显优于许多其他中档智能手机。超广角摄像头也做得很好，但图像质量并不像主摄像头那样好，边缘区域容易出现模糊和变色的情况。

之后，你还可以使用各种人工智能功能来处理记录的内容。例如，这些功能包括集成在谷歌照片中的 "魔术橡皮擦"，它可以从照片中删除选定的物体，或者也包含在应用程序中的 "真实色调过滤器"，以实现对肤色的最佳再现。

后面的摄像头可以录制高达4K的60FPS的视频，也可以选择慢动作或延时。有了光学和电子图像稳定功能，它可以成功地拍摄出良好的记录。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight picture 1 Daylight picture 2 Ultrawide angle 5x zoom Lowlight picture

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们在测试实验室里仔细观察一下这台相机。在最佳光照条件下，色彩的再现相当自然，只有绿色色调的顶部有轻微的偏差。在低光照条件下，颜色仍然容易辨认。

即使在只有1勒克斯的光线下，色卡图片中的颜色仍然可以毫无障碍地与原始颜色联系起来。测试图仍然很容易辨认，即使这时图像的清晰度略有下降。

ColorChecker Google Pixel 6a: 6.19 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 15.18 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不包括充电器

看看Pixel 6a的超薄包装盒，你已经可以从外面看到，里面不包括充电器。取而代之的是一条USB 2.0电缆（Type-C转C），一个SIM卡工具，一个USB-C转A的适配器，一份快速启动手册，以及保修说明。在谷歌网店，你还可以选择购买配件，如Pixel 6a外壳（29欧元，约28美元），或30瓦的USB-C充电器（29欧元，约28美元）。

在欧盟国家，你可以获得谷歌Pixel 6a的两年保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 指纹传感器和永远在线的显示屏

由于其强大的张量SoC，Pixel 6a可以非常流畅地操作，即使同时打开许多应用程序也不会开始卡顿。然而，与像素6和 Pixel 6 Pro，这款智能手机仍然感觉不太快，因为显示屏刷新率只有60赫兹，而Pixel 6达到90赫兹，Pixel 6 Pro为120赫兹。但这应该只有那些在换成Pixel 6a之前已经享受过较高刷新率的用户才会感觉到。

在生物识别解锁方面，谷歌智能手机只提供了指纹传感器，脸部识别并不包括在其安全剧目中。据称，人脸解锁仍应在更新中出现，但到目前为止我们还没有看到任何东西。如果你在设置中搜索 "人脸识别"，会出现相应的选项，但它控制的是另一个功能。在这一点上，它只是为了提高转动显示屏时的自动准确性。

光学指纹传感器被放置在显示屏下方，并能可靠地工作。之前在众多在线社区中被批评的缓慢处理速度在这段时间通过更新得到了改善。如果显示屏被关闭，你首先要通过点击显示屏来激活指纹传感器。另外，你也可以激活常亮功能，这时除了时间和日期外，还将显示指纹图标。始终在线显示可以通过 "显示"、"锁屏"设置中一个略显隐蔽的选项来激活，该选项称为始终显示时间和信息。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 一块明亮的AMOLED面板，具有60赫兹和HDR10功能

Pixel 6a的6.1英寸AMOLED显示屏提供2400 x 1080像素（FHD+）的分辨率，以恒定的60赫兹运行。除了HDR10之外，它还支持HDR10+和HLG。

Pixel显示屏的亮度对于中档智能手机来说非常出色，在纯白背景下平均达到767.2cd/m²。如果将测量范围限制在图像的一部分（APL18），亮度几乎甚至达到了四位数的数值。然后，AMOLED面板达到了998 cd/m²。在关闭亮度传感器的情况下，最高为476 cd/m²，我们在最低亮度设置下测量到2.59 cd/m²。

在最低亮度设置下，显示屏在34和240赫兹之间来回闪烁，相当不稳定。在更高的亮度设置下，振幅继续上升，因此，对PWM闪烁敏感的用户应该会遇到一些困难。另一方面，我们没有注意到时间上的抖动。为了评估这一点，我们用显微镜和慢动作视频（240 FPS）检查显示器。


746 cd/m²	745 cd/m²	770 cd/m²
762 cd/m²	758 cd/m²	780 cd/m²
772 cd/m²	775 cd/m²	797 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 797 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 767.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.59 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 758 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Google Pixel 6a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"	Apple iPhone SE 2022 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	Google Pixel 6 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Motorola Moto G200 5G IPS LCD, 2460x1080, 6.8"	Nothing Phone (1) OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy A53 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Xiaomi 12 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"
Screen		-31%	-17%	-104%	-11%	-31%	-24%
Brightness middle	758	662 -13%	805 6%	512 -32%	620 -18%	718 -5%	867 14%
Brightness	767	647 -16%	805 5%	488 -36%	625 -19%	730 -5%	867 13%
Brightness Distribution	93	92 -1%	98 5%	87 -6%	98 5%	92 -1%	98 5%
Black Level *		0.4		0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.9	1.44 -60%	1.4 -56%	3.42 -280%	1.24 -38%	1.62 -80%	1.7 -89%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.5	4.74 -90%	3.7 -48%	5.9 -136%	2.31 8%	4.21 -68%	4.4 -76%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.7 -6%	1.8 -13%	3.7 -131%	1.7 -6%	2 -25%	1.8 -13%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.179 ^101%	2.29 ^96%	7154 ^0%	2.318 ^95%	2.156 ^102%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6599 ^98%	6746 ^96%	6507 ^100%	1.944 ^334362%	6325 ^103%	6545 ^99%	6762 ^96%
Contrast		1655		1422

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平下，以不同的亮度设置进行一系列的测量

▶ load Youtube video

AMOLED面板的色彩再现非常好。如果你在显示设置中激活自然图像模式，与理想值的偏差就会非常小。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.519 ms rise
2.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.394 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.834 ms rise
1.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.9455 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于其明亮的显示屏，Pixel 6a在户外也能打出好成绩。如果你避免阳光直射，可读性几乎总是完美无缺。从陡峭的视角也能轻松阅读内容，因为亮度只是略微降低。

性能--由于谷歌张量的强大功能

Pixel 6系列是首款由内部运行的谷歌智能手机。的TensorSoC。除此以外，还有 Pixel 6和 Pixel 6 Pro，Pixel 6a因此也可以享受使用快速处理器。然而，与它的兄弟姐妹机型相比，谷歌智能手机不得不满足于6GB而不是8GB的LPDDR5-RAM。

不过，在合成基准测试中，内存的差异并不明显。Pixel 6a在测试中的运行速度几乎与Pixel 6一样，对于一款中端智能手机来说，它的性能非常好。另一方面，Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G ，用于摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G则更快。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	1741 Points +70%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1237 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1076 Points +5%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	1041 Points +2%
Average Google Tensor (1025 - 1057, n=3)	1041 Points +2%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	1025 Points
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	1021 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	824 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	740 Points -28%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	4788 Points +63%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3581 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)	3404 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	3286 Points +12%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2998 Points +2%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	2940 Points
Average Google Tensor (2805 - 2941, n=3)	2895 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	2805 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1878 Points -36%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	982789 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)	810387 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	794271 Points +11%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	733484 Points +3%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	715338 Points
Average Google Tensor (702981 - 720905, n=3)	713075 Points 0%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	702981 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	582264 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	409976 Points -43%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	18567 Points +91%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14508 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)	13055 Points +34%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	11662 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	11470 Points +18%
Average Google Tensor (9717 - 11605, n=3)	10577 Points +9%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	10409 Points +7%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	9717 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	1132 Points +31%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1109 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)	894 Points +3%
Average Google Tensor (849 - 906, n=3)	873 Points +1%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	865 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	849 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	760 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	579 Points -33%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6860 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points +7%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	6287 Points +6%
Average Google Tensor (5950 - 6287, n=3)	6097 Points +2%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	5950 Points
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	5711 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4768 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3626 Points -39%
System
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10424 Points +14%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10334 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +12%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	9109 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	9085 Points 0%
Average Google Tensor (9009 - 9109, n=3)	9068 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	8546 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	7157 Points -21%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points +4%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	6592 Points
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6535 Points -1%
Average Google Tensor (6071 - 6592, n=3)	6333 Points -4%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	6071 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	5648 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4763 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3855 Points -42%
Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	18370 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points +23%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	15303 Points +8%
Average Google Tensor (13319 - 15303, n=3)	14257 Points +1%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	14148 Points
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	13865 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	8175 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	5178 Points -63%
Web
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	1851 Points +25%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1785 Points +21%
Average Google Tensor (1476 - 1851, n=3)	1697 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1665 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points +6%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	1476 Points
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1273 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1210 Points -18%

AImark - Score v2.x
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	286905 Points +4708%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096	104532 Points +1652%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6766 Points +13%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	5967 Points
Average Google Tensor (5723 - 5967, n=3)	5824 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	5823 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	5723 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4714 Points -21%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	28581 Points +32%
Average Google Tensor (21639 - 28581, n=3)	26055 Points +20%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	21639 Points
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	20784 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 75143, n=147, last 2 years)	17334 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4239 Points -80%

对于图形计算来说，芯片SoC使用其集成的 ARM Mali-G78 MP20GPU。你还必须用放大镜搜索，才能找到Pixel 6a和Pixel 6a之间的性能差异。像素6这里。在GFXBench中，刷新率限制为60赫兹，阻止了更高的屏幕数值。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2418 Points +49%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	1877 Points +15%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1823 Points +12%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1626 Points
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1453 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	686 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	621 Points -62%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2586 Points +27%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	2399 Points +18%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2067 Points +1%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2040 Points
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1564 Points -23%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	692 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	636 Points -69%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9782 Points +35%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	8909 Points +23%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7261 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7064 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5711 Points -21%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2576 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2275 Points -69%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9713 Points +45%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	8357 Points +25%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6954 Points +4%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6695 Points
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5765 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2570 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2293 Points -66%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4864 Points +14%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4518 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4303 Points +1%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4277 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3643 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3097 Points -28%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18286 Points +104%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10875 Points +21%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8957 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8605 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5759 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3982 Points -56%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10618 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8234 Points +14%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7205 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6606 Points -8%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5428 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3746 Points -48%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9693 Points +2%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9526 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7344 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4645 Points -51%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24177 Points +73%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13988 Points
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11005 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5510 Points -61%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4501 Points
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3754 Points -17%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3393 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2997 Points -33%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps +88%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	428 fps +70%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	358 fps +42%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	252 fps
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	161 fps -36%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps -43%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	141 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	92 fps -63%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps +32%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps +23%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	213 fps +41%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	187 fps +24%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	151 fps
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps -39%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -40%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	82 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	61 fps -60%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -3%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	35 fps -42%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	164 fps +64%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	100 fps
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps -36%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps -38%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -40%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	38 fps -62%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +50%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +11%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -33%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -35%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps -63%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	82 fps +58%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +50%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -19%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -23%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps -56%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +77%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +54%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +3%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -15%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps -62%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +39%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	39 fps +39%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -18%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -32%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps -64%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps +116%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +40%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +9%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -2%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps -47%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps +71%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	95.9 fps +65%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -16%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps -55%

Pixel 6a在浏览器速度方面没有表现出任何弱点，但由于内存较小，它的速度并不像其他Pixel兄弟姐妹那样快。网站的渲染速度很快，也能流畅地滚动。然而，在这场竞争中，所有的Android 智能手机都没有机会对抗 Apple iPhone SE 2022在浏览器基准测试中没有机会。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)	182.6 Points +143%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)	121.7 Points +62%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	113.8 Points +51%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	90.1 Points +20%
Average Google Tensor (75.3 - 91.7, n=3)	85.7 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	75.9 Points +1%
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)	75.261 Points
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	73.679 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	63.5 Points -16%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chome 99)	239 runs/min +164%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)	139.5 runs/min +54%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	107 runs/min +18%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	104 runs/min +15%
Average Google Tensor (90.4 - 111, n=3)	101.8 runs/min +13%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	90.4 runs/min
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	79.8 runs/min -12%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)	53.71 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)	51.24 runs/min -43%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)	265 Points +244%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +93%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	148 Points +92%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	147 Points +91%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	110 Points +43%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	102 Points +32%
Average Google Tensor (77 - 110, n=3)	97.3 Points +26%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	77 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	69 Points -10%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)	65969 Points +100%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	43376 Points +31%
Average Google Tensor (33046 - 44034, n=3)	40152 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37721 Points +14%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	37279 Points +13%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	33046 Points
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	28695 Points -13%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	24488 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	24159 Points -27%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	1920.3 ms * -25%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	1796.1 ms * -17%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * -1%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	1531.6 ms *
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	1358 ms * +11%
Average Google Tensor (915 - 1532, n=3)	1160 ms * +24%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	1034 ms * +32%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	930 ms * +39%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)	497.2 ms * +68%

* ... smaller is better

正如预期的那样，Pixel 6a的UFS 3.1存储系统提供了很高的数据传输率，甚至能够击败像素6顺序写入。然而，在我们的对比设备中，存储速度的明显冠军是小米12.

	Google Pixel 6a	Google Pixel 6	Motorola Moto G200 5G	Nothing Phone (1)	Samsung Galaxy A53	Xiaomi 12	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-27%	15%	32%	-24%	71%	12%	53%
Sequential Read 256KB	1312.64	1546 18%	1898 45%	1638 25%	510.1 -61%	1851 41%	1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=60) 22%	1867 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 42%
Sequential Write 256KB	712.94	233.4 -67%	712 0%	1351.9 90%	486.7 -32%	1417 99%	748 ?(233 - 1332, n=60) 5%	1451 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 104%
Random Read 4KB	219.53	126.2 -43%	155.9 -29%	240.6 10%	229.9 5%	325.2 48%	243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=60) 11%	279 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 27%
Random Write 4KB	225.61	190.3 -16%	322.5 43%	228.2 1%	210.8 -7%	437.5 94%	244 ?(121.4 - 503, n=60) 8%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 38%

游戏--流畅的游戏没有问题

以最大的细节设置显示当前的游戏，对Pixel 6a来说没有问题。然而，超过60 FPS是不可能的，因为显示器不允许有更高的帧率。根据不同的游戏，60 FPS也达不到，因为帧率会受到限制，这可能是为了节省电力而做的。例如，这种情况发生在《PUBG移动版》中，它在高清/高配置下以30 FPS运行。虽然它可以处理更多，但它不被允许。另一方面，在Armajet中，显示刷新率可以使用到最大限度。

我们用Gamebench来确定游戏时的帧率。测试工具来确定游戏的帧率。

Google Pixel 6a; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.9 (58-60)

Google Pixel 6a; PUBG Mobile; 2.1.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

排放 - 负载下的节流

温度

虽然Pixel 6a的表面温度在运行中很快就超过了30°C大关（86°F），但在最高38.2°C（约101°F）的情况下，它从未感到不舒服的热度。然而，为了实现这一目标，智能手机必须使用一些技巧，因为SoC在高负荷下会很快被扼杀。正如3DMark Wild Life的压力测试所显示的，在最坏的情况下，这将使性能降低55%以上。

Max. Load

Idle


35.3 °C	35.3 °C	34.4 °C
37.5 °C	36.7 °C	34.8 °C
36.6 °C	38.2 °C	35.1 °C

Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 36 °C


33.7 °C	35.6 °C	36.3 °C
33.2 °C	36 °C	37.6 °C
33.5 °C	37.5 °C	38.4 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 35.8 °C

Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.6 % +132%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 % +132%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80.4 % +87%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	79.5 % +85%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.1 % +24%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46.3 % +8%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42.9 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % +101%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	97.8 % +99%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 % +61%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD	61.4 % +25%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54.9 % +12%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49.2 %
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.52 (6.17-12.6)

Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.78 (7.06-12.9)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)

Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.7 (17.4-40.5)

Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.5 (22.2-41.9)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)

Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø28.2 (19.7-42.9)

发言人

Pixel 6a的立体声扬声器产生的声音在低音方面很差，但其他方面相对平衡。你可以将有线音频设备连接到USB-C端口，或通过音频端口适配器电缆连接，遗憾的是，该电缆没有包括在内。通过蓝牙5.2连接的设备可以使用AAC、SBC、LDAC、aptX和aptX HD蓝牙编解码。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 6a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 18瓦的充电功率和良好的运行时间

消耗功率

Pixel 6a的4410毫安时电池可以在高达18瓦的功率下充电。你必须自己去买相应的适配器，比如说可以在谷歌商店里找到。但你也可以使用任何其他充电器，为了获得最佳充电体验，谷歌建议使用支持USB PD-3.0标准的充电器。该智能手机不支持无线充电。

Pixel 6a的耗电量并不明显。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.06 / 0.17 Watt
Idle	0.68 / 1.56 / 1.58 Watt
Load	5.37 / 8.74 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2022 2018 mAh	Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh	Motorola Moto G200 5G 5000 mAh	Nothing Phone (1) 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh	Average Google Tensor	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		2%	14%	7%	4%	-1%	-5%	6%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	0.68	0.6 12%	0.68 -0%	0.6 12%	1 -47%	0.9 -32%	0.87 -28%	0.687 ?(0.68 - 0.7, n=3) -1%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) -30%
Idle Average *	1.56	0.9 42%	1 36%	0.9 42%	1.2 23%	1.3 17%	1.7 -9%	1.187 ?(1 - 1.56, n=3) 24%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 7%
Idle Maximum *	1.58	1.5 5%	1.02 35%	1.5 5%	1.5 5%	1.6 -1%	1.82 -15%	1.213 ?(1.02 - 1.58, n=3) 23%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) -2%
Load Average *	5.37	6.5 -21%	5.39 -0%	7 -30%	4.2 22%	5.7 -6%	4.68 13%	5.88 ?(5.37 - 6.87, n=3) -9%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -22%
Load Maximum *	8.74	11 -26%	9 -3%	8.4 4%	7.4 15%	7.3 16%	7.41 15%	9.2 ?(8.74 - 9.87, n=3) -5%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -14%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor: Ø5.41 (1.011-10.6)

Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor: Ø5.28 (0.821-10.1)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280: Ø7.03 (4.38-10.4)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.65 (6.03-11.4)

Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.4 (9.25-12.3)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.55 (7.22-9.66)

Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.013 (0.966-1.263)

Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.758 (0.531-1.025)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.129 (0.898-1.623)

电池寿命

Pixel 6a实现了良好的电池寿命，提供了足够的续航能力，即使你密集使用它，也能坚持一整天。在我们模拟网络冲浪的测试中，这款谷歌智能手机的续航时间接近13小时，我们能够让它播放视频近22小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		31h 18min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 00min

	Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2022 2018 mAh	Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh	Motorola Moto G200 5G 5000 mAh	Nothing Phone (1) 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-21%	-9%	10%	-8%	-0%	3%
Reader / Idle	1878	2049 9%	2020 8%	2695 44%	1813 -3%	2431 29%	2558 36%
H.264	1318	797 -40%	1219 -8%	1501 14%	1059 -20%	1146 -13%	890 -32%
WiFi v1.3	768	769 0%	627 -18%	905 18%	926 21%	886 15%	760 -1%
Load	360	164 -54%	291 -19%	229 -36%	259 -28%	246 -32%	385 7%

Pros

+ 明亮的AMOLED显示屏

+ 永远在线的显示屏

+ 快速的SoC

+ IP67认证

+ USB-C 3.1 Gen 1

+ 强大的双摄像头

+ 更新时间长

Cons

- 只有60赫兹

- 最大存储量为128GB

- 没有无线充电

- 不包括充电器

- 最大充电功率为18瓦

对谷歌Pixel 6a的评判

Pixel 6a是一款纤薄而强大的智能手机，几乎在所有重要领域都能给人留下深刻印象。这款6.1英寸的谷歌智能手机拥有非常明亮的AMOLED，色彩准确，提供了坚实的电池寿命，并凭借其双摄像头系统轻松超越了大多数其他中档竞争对手。

根据IP67标准，Pixel 6a具有防尘和防水功能，对于所有希望尽可能长时间使用智能手机的用户来说，它也是一个非常好的选择。谷歌承诺至少5年的安全更新，并希望提供Android ，至少到2025年7月。

Pixel用户也是第一批能够享受到新的Android 版本的用户，同时也受益于特殊的软件功能，例如Magic Eraser，它可以轻松地从照片中去除特定的物体。

谷歌Pixel 6a是一款功能强大的中端智能手机，具有高档次的性能，非常好的相机，而且更新期长。遗憾的是，它的显示屏仍然限制在60赫兹。

在性能方面，Pixel 6a与它的像素6和 Pixel 6 Pro在Pixel系列中占据较高位置的兄弟姐妹。然而，它在其他方面显示出一些局限性。最大的缺点是显示屏刷新率限制在60赫兹，这确实使它太贵了。只需多花大约50欧元（约合48美元），你就已经可以得到像素6，它配备了90赫兹的面板和一个更好的摄像头。

除了Pixel 6，谷歌Pixel 6a的另一个替代品也是小米12 ，例如。由于外形相似，它的速度明显更快，也带来了120赫兹的显示屏。其他替代品还有Nothing Phone (1) 和三星Galaxy A53 。

价格和可用性

谷歌Pixel 6a在谷歌商店的起价为 449美元.目前你可以在网上找到更便宜的产品，例如亚马逊的 390美元。.

Google Pixel 6a - 09/21/2022 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 75%

Weight

90%

Battery

91%

Display

93%

Games Performance

52 / 64 → 81%

Application Performance

83 / 86 → 97%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 86%

Camera

71%

Average

80%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 464535 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 谷歌Pixel 6a评测--强大的中端智能手机，但显示屏较小的缺陷

Manuel Masiero, 2022-09-25 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 高质量、轻质，并通过IP67认证

尺寸比较

设备--Pixel 6a的6GB内存和128GB存储空间

软件 -Android 13和长期更新的保证

通信和GNSS - 大量的频段和快速的Wi-Fi 6E

电话功能和语音质量

相机 - 属于中档次的最佳产品

配件和保修 - 不包括充电器

输入设备和操作 - 指纹传感器和永远在线的显示屏

显示屏 - 一块明亮的AMOLED面板，具有60赫兹和HDR10功能

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能--由于谷歌张量的强大功能

游戏--流畅的游戏没有问题

排放 - 负载下的节流

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Google Pixel 6a audio analysis

Google Pixel 6 audio analysis

电池寿命 - 18瓦的充电功率和良好的运行时间

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对谷歌Pixel 6a的评判

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison