Notebookcheck Logo

小米12智能手机评测--一个紧凑而强大的高级包装

虽小但心胸宽广。

旗舰智能手机应该尽可能大--至少许多制造商似乎是这么认为的。小米12的做法恰恰相反:6.28英寸,它和Apple iPhone 13一样紧凑,但仍然提供了配得上旗舰的性能。正如我们的测试所显示的,它在其他设备方面也发挥了顶级水平。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米公司推出了新一代智能手机。小米12系列取代了11系列的机型,有三个不同版本。除了 小米12X小米12 Pro,制造商还提供了一个标准版本的旗舰机型小米12。这就是我们在此评估的机型。

尽管有旗舰机的基因,小米12是一款相对紧凑的智能手机。它的弧形显示屏尺寸为6.28英寸,其尺寸接近于 Apple iPhone 13.凭借其 骁龙8代来自高通公司,小米12在SoC性能方面属于强大的精英,其做工和其余设备也显示出它发挥了顶级水平。然而,对于小米至少850欧元(约949美元)的要价,这也是一个要求。

Xiaomi 12 (12 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.28 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 419 PPI, capacitive, OLED, FHD+, touch sampling rate up to 480Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 226.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, ambient light sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, compass, linear motor, flicker sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, WiFi Direct, Miracast, IR blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (B1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/38/39/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78/n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.66 x 152.7 x 69.9
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX766, OIS, f/1.88, 24mm, 1/1.56") + 13MP ultrawide angle lens (f/2.4, 12mm, 123°) + 5MP macro camera (50mm), videos up to 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps, HDR10+ video
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.45, 1.4µm, 80.5°, videos up to 1080p@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: dual speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger, USB Type-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, quick start guide, warranty card, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
179 g, Power Supply: 100 g
Price
0 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
87.7 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Xiaomi 12
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
179 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.28"2400x1080
88.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Apple iPhone 13
A15, A15 GPU 4-Core
173 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
87.4 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2021
Google Pixel 6
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
88.8 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
177 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
87.1 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Sony Xperia 5 III
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
168 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.10"2520x1080
87.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440

外壳 - 仿皮后盖,仅适用于中国版本

小米12采用AMOLED面板,由Gorilla Glas Victus保护,并装有一个冲孔摄像头。显示屏的边缘是弯曲的,没有任何缝隙地过渡到哑光铝框架和后盖,后者也是弯曲的。这不仅看起来非常优雅,而且还提供了一个高质量的整体感觉。然而,在我们的进口版本的仿皮后盖上,在一些仅是适度的扭转尝试中,我们能够产生一些吱吱嘎嘎的声音。

小米12的外观与小米12X的外观完全一样。 小米12X小到最小的细节。两款智能手机有相同的尺寸,也使用相同的设计语言。只有 小米12 Pro是12系列的顶级机型,很容易区分。尽管它使用相同的设计,但它的6.73英寸,比小米12和小米12X大得多,它们都是6.28英寸。小米12型号中没有一款提供IP认证。

小米12有蓝色、灰色和紫色三种颜色版本。后盖由磨砂玻璃制成,有一点粗糙的感觉,不显示任何指纹。中国版本还增加了第四个颜色版本,这也是我们的测试单元:它的绿色后盖由人造皮革制成。虽然外观始终是一个品味问题,但支持仿皮版本的一个理由是,与玻璃版本相比,它使智能手机不那么滑。

紫色版本,背面为哑光玻璃

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g158.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.9 mm 207 g157 mm 68 mm 8.2 mm 168 g155.7 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 177 g152.7 mm 69.9 mm 8.66 mm 179 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.7 mm 173 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备--小米12的8GB内存和高达256GB的存储空间

小米12使用8GB的LPDDR5内存,可选择提供128或256GB的UFS 3.1存储。由于小米没有为其智能手机配备microSD插槽,所以你无法扩展存储。虽然也没有音频端口,但你可以使用附带的3.5毫米适配器与USB-C端口。这也支持USB OTG,有了它还可以连接外围设备。然而,它的数据传输速度仅限于USB-2.0。这款智能手机还支持蓝牙5.2,NFC,并包括一个红外发射器。

左边:没有连接
左边:没有连接
右边:音量摇杆,电源按钮
右边:音量摇杆,电源按钮
顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器
顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

软件 -Android 12和MIUI 13

小米12使用Android 12,与小米内部的MIUI 13用户界面相结合。在本次测试时(3月中旬),Android 安全补丁处于2022年2月的水平,这使得它们相当及时。

在我们的中文测试单元中,语言选择针对亚洲国家进行了优化,因此大多数其他用户可能不得不选择英语作为系统语言。你可以毫无问题地安装缺少的Play Store,因为谷歌应用商店所需的所有服务都已经安装在小米12上。中文应用程序都可以卸载,例如,中文键盘可以用谷歌Gboard代替。如果你购买全球版的小米手机,你自然不需要执行这样的本地化任务。

通信和GNSS - 非常快的WiFi 6E

我们测试的进口版本缺少在德国很重要的4G频段20,但小米12的全球版本应该不存在这种限制。如果你在小米商店购买这款智能手机,当然包括20号频段。

对于WLAN网络中的通信,小米12支持所有常见的WiFi标准,包括WiFi 6E,并使用MIMO天线技术。当我们使用一个兼容WiFi-6E的路由器,如我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考设备,小米12在我们的测试中显示出非常快的WLAN传输速率,最高可达1751 Mbit/s。在5-GHz网络中使用WiFi 6,与华硕路由器结合使用时,数据速率保持不变,但与WiFi 6E相比,速率减半。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
833 (794min - 859max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
802 (421min - 857max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 5 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
680 (620min - 701max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
895 (870min - 907max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 5 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
839 (805min - 859max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
715 (672min - 723max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1214 (516min - 1524max) MBit/s +60%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
757 (380min - 826max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
737 (358min - 769max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=190, last 2 years)
736 MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1465 (1307min - 1536max) MBit/s +72%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
855 (649min - 889max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 (763min - 898max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=188, last 2 years)
719 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)
1444 MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1407 (872min - 1714max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1751 (879min - 1776max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)
1377 MBit/s -21%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1407 (872-1714)
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1722 (879-1776)
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø854 (763-898)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1463 (1307-1536)
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø745 (380-826)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1197 (516-1524)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

在导航方面,小米12使用GPS(L1,L5)、伽利略(E1,E5a)、格洛纳斯(L1)、北斗(B1,B1c,B2a)和NavIC(L5)卫星服务。在我们的测试中,智能手机确定其当前位置的精确度为3米(10英尺)。

在我们的实际测试中,准确度也保持很高,我们带着智能手机骑了10公里(约6.2英里)的自行车。小米12记录我们的测试路线,几乎与佳明Venu 2专业导航设备一样准确。虽然我们有时会在人口非常密集的路线路段看到一些较大的偏差,但这并不影响其良好的导航特性。

GPS测试:概述
GPS测试:概述
GPS测试:环湖
GPS测试:环湖
GPS测试:转折点
GPS测试:转折点

电话功能和语音质量

小米12提供了一个良好的语音质量。在我们的测试通话中,声音听起来很自然,对话伙伴在较高的环境中也能理解对方。如果周围的噪音保持在一定范围内,在扬声器模式下的通信也没有问题。两个SIM卡插槽都支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。

相机 - 索尼IMX766,5千万像素

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片

小米12使用的相机设置与 小米12X.前面有一个3200万像素的自拍相机,在充足的光线条件下提供良好的图像质量,还包括一些可选的美容过滤器,使脸部看起来更漂亮。它能够以每秒60帧的速度录制高达1080p的视频。

主摄像头包括5000万像素的索尼IMX766传感器和光学图像稳定。在默认设置中,四个相邻的像素被合并成一个较大的像素,从而得到12MP的照片。另外,你也可以使用完整的5000万像素。三个镜头中的中央一个隐藏着一个500万像素的微距相机,能够在3至7厘米(约1.2 - 2.8英寸)的特写范围内拍摄清晰的照片。底部镜头藏有1300万像素的超广角镜头,具有123度的视角。它能拍出好照片,在边缘区域几乎不出现任何色差。

在日光条件下,主摄像头也能拍出好照片,显示出大量的细节,在大多数情况下也拥有平衡的色彩再现。然而,正如你在我们的测试场景1和3中看到的那样,有时小米12再现的色彩过于饱和,使照片显得非常生动,但也略显不自然。在用数码变焦拍摄的照片中,由于有光学图像稳定功能,只要你不放大照片本身,物体仍然非常清晰。结合夜间模式,主摄像头还能在低光照条件下拍摄一些大气的照片。

视频记录稳定可靠,看起来非常好。它们可以以24 FPS的速度记录,最大分辨率为8K。有了4K和30 FPS(最高支持60 FPS),你可以在主镜头和超广角镜头之间切换。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Ultraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme
orginal image
click to load images

在实验室的受控光线条件下,我们可以看到,即使在最好的光线条件下(顶部ColorChecker卡),主相机也无法最佳地再现色彩,因为一些色彩偏差显示Delta E超过12。在弱光条件下(底部色卡),色彩准确性甚至进一步下降。然而,索尼的传感器仍然能够捕捉到相对较多的光线,使你能够识别我们测试图表中的所有元素。

ColorChecker
15.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
14 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12: 10.05 ∆E min: 1.44 - max: 18.61 ∆E
ColorChecker
24.7 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
46 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
42 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12: 32.23 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 50.85 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括67瓦的充电器

小米12的包装盒包括一个67瓦的充电器,USB线(C型到A型),SIM卡工具,保护套,快速入门手册和保修卡。小米没有为其智能手机提供任何特定的配件,但你仍然可以在制造商的网上商店购买其他物品,如蓝牙扬声器。

借给我们测试设备的TradingShenzhen公司为小米12的进口版提供12个月的保修。如果你在小米商店购买全球版本的智能手机,你将获得24个月的保修。在前6个月内,还包括免费更换显示屏。

输入设备和操作 - 准确和反应灵敏的触摸屏

小米12可以非常流畅地操作,总是给人一种印象,即它可以处理任何你可能想扔给它的任务。20:9的显示屏以高达480赫兹的扫描率运行,执行触摸指令时没有任何明显的延迟,扫描非常准确,直至角落。

弧形面板的纤细边框仍然为手指留下了足够的空间,所以很少有意外输入的情况发生。另一方面,我们发现在交付状态下安装的保护膜并不理想。 虽然它仍然遵循弯曲的显示屏轮廓,除了边缘的一个非常小的条带外,覆盖了整个显示屏,但我们可以在保护膜和显示屏之间的过渡中感受到一个相当明显的硬边。

你可以通过二维人脸识别或隐藏在显示屏下的光学指纹传感器来解锁小米12的生物识别。这两种方法都能快速、可靠地工作。

键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向

显示屏 - 一个非常快速的AMOLED面板,带有HDR10+和杜比视界

子像素网格
子像素网格

小米12的6.28英寸AMOLED显示屏具有2400 x 1080像素的分辨率。这相当于419PPI的像素密度,保证了图像显示的清晰度。在标准设置下,刷新率在60和120赫兹之间自动切换,这取决于显示的内容。另外,你也可以把它固定在两个数值中的一个。

在白色图像显示中,AMOLED显示屏的平均亮度达到867cd/m²,也具有非常均匀的亮度分布。在APL50模式下(具有均匀分布的明亮和黑暗图像区域),亮度增加到998 cd/m²。在停用亮度传感器的情况下,最大可能是482 cd/m²。在最低亮度水平下,显示屏的亮度为2.16 cd/m²。

AMOLED显示屏通过脉冲宽度调制(PWM)控制其亮度,在50%或更低的亮度水平上,在162.4至551.2赫兹的频率范围内闪烁。在此之上,PWM闪烁分别以恒定的60或120赫兹发生。

871
cd/m²
875
cd/m²
875
cd/m²
863
cd/m²
867
cd/m²
872
cd/m²
864
cd/m²
861
cd/m²
855
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 875 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 867 cd/m² Minimum: 2.16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 867 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi 12
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"
Apple iPhone 13
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"
Google Pixel 6
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Sony Xperia 5 III
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
24%
3%
-2%
-40%
14%
Brightness middle
867
831
-4%
805
-7%
758
-13%
554
-36%
959
11%
Brightness
867
830
-4%
805
-7%
758
-13%
559
-36%
977
13%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
98
0%
99
1%
95
-3%
96
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.7
0.77
55%
1.4
18%
1.5
12%
2.22
-31%
1.1
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.4
1.52
65%
3.7
16%
3.1
30%
5.94
-35%
3.1
30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.2
33%
1.8
-0%
2.3
-28%
3.6
-100%
1.9
-6%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.209 100%
2.29 96%
2.06 107%
2.193 100%
2.22 99%
CCT
6762 96%
6501 100%
6507 100%
6378 102%
7000 93%
6498 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 551 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 551 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 551 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小的显示亮度
最小的显示亮度
25%的显示亮度
25%的显示亮度
50%的显示亮度
50%的显示亮度
75%的显示亮度
75%的显示亮度

小米12支持HDR10+和Dolby Vision。默认的 "鲜艳 "色彩模式被调整至此,涵盖了DCI-P3色彩空间,与sRGB相比,DCI-P3色彩空间明显更大。正如我们用色度计和CalMAN软件的测量结果显示,"鲜艳 "色彩模式在一般情况下也是一个非常好的选择,因为使用这种模式,小米12在色彩和灰度再现以及色温和RGB平衡方面都保持在理想的目标范围内。

色彩准确性(鲜艳的色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
色彩准确性(鲜艳的色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
色彩空间(生动的色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
色彩空间(生动的色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
灰度(鲜艳色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
灰度(鲜艳色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
饱和度(鲜艳色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
饱和度(鲜艳色彩模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.307 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.624 ms rise
↘ 0.683 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.462 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.667 ms rise
↘ 0.796 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

其高亮度使小米12非常适用于户外使用。即使在阳光直射下,显示内容仍然可以轻松阅读。

在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
在户外阳光直射下
在户外阳光直射下

AMOLED面板的可视角度稳定性很好。由于它的结构,从非常陡峭的视角可以看到轻微的色纱,然后我们也注意到亮度的轻微降低。然而,这些行为并不影响可读性,总体来说是好的。

视角
视角

性能--快速的Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

小米12使用高通公司的新的 骁龙8代1顶级SoC,这也包括在 小米12 Pro12系列的旗舰机。在小米12中,该处理器配有8GB的LPDDR5内存和集成的 阿德雷诺730图形单元,使这一硬件总体上非常强大。

在合成基准测试中,小米12的运行速度总体上比Android 智能手机的速度快。 骁龙888这决不是慢。然而,与前代产品的差异只是很小,特别是在CPU重度测试中。与骁龙8代相比,其性能为TensorSoC的性能谷歌Pixel 6的性能明显较慢。即使是 Apple iPhone 13也不能完全跟上,但它跟在小米12后面,比Android 智能手机要近得多。

然而,小米12仍然无法完全说服我们,因为尽管激活了性能模式,它在AImark中仍然落后于竞争对手很多。即使重复运行和插入长时间的冷却时间,也不能改变AI基准测试中的这个糟糕结果。有趣的是,谷歌Pixel 6在这里也没有做得更好。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
1755 Points +42%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1237 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1181 - 1298, n=21)
1231 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1137 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1092 Points -12%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1041 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1012 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
4820 Points +35%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points +4%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3581 Points
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3572 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=21)
3548 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3370 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
3204 Points -11%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
2805 Points -22%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
7701 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 21892, n=43, last 2 years)
7211 Points +10%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6541 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5157 - 8462, n=16)
6389 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4407 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4399 Points -33%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points -100%
OpenCL Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 18407, n=37, last 2 years)
7356 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5820 - 6291, n=16)
5985 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
5972 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4748 Points -20%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4673 Points -22%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
Points -100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14729 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14508 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
14107 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (10140 - 17025, n=21)
13216 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=192, last 2 years)
13052 Points -10%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
10409 Points -28%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10958 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6784 - 13121, n=17)
10889 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
9787 Points +1%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9693 Points
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
7344 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
24177 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15268 - 26049, n=17)
22365 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20842 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
15358 Points -36%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
11005 Points -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4312 Points +15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4120 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (2237 - 4811, n=17)
3942 Points +5%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3754 Points
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
3393 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=72, last 2 years)
3088 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=72, last 2 years)
3272 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=72, last 2 years)
3285 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10618 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5983 - 11528, n=16)
9675 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9149 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
8366 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 22303, n=161, last 2 years)
7911 Points -25%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6606 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
5713 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
18286 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (11082 - 19392, n=16)
16625 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13950 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33560, n=161, last 2 years)
11758 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
11309 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
9878 Points -46%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
8605 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10259, n=161, last 2 years)
4659 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4378 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4303 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4150 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (2283 - 4771, n=16)
3965 Points -8%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
3643 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2307 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=71, last 2 years)
2850 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=71, last 2 years)
3103 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=71, last 2 years)
2702 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
Points
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9927 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9713 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6351 - 10062, n=14)
9091 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
8788 Points -10%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6954 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5787 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5683 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=110, last 2 years)
2853 Points -71%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10384 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
9979 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9782 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6483 - 10412, n=20)
9608 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 21065, n=182, last 2 years)
7652 Points -22%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
7064 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5872 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5064 Points -48%
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2609 Points +1%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2586 Points
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2470 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1629 - 2639, n=20)
2470 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=189, last 2 years)
2106 Points -19%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
2067 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1500 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1456 Points -44%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2513 Points +4%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2418 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1567 - 2585, n=21)
2386 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2313 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=187, last 2 years)
2099 Points -13%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1823 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1256 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
974 Points -60%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
121 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
121 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
119 fps -2%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
117 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=16)
99.8 fps -18%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
90 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)
86.8 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps -50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
428 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
425 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
416.3 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (245 - 450, n=17)
361 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years)
286 fps -33%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
202 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
178 fps -58%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
144 fps -66%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
121 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
117 fps -3%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
113 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
103 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=16)
89.4 fps -26%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
79 fps -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)
76.3 fps -37%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.2 fps -50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
251 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
217.4 fps +2%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
213 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (141 - 265, n=17)
190 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years)
169.3 fps -21%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
129 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
109 fps -49%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
90 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
121 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
87 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (50 - 121, n=16)
77.9 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
73 fps -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)
66.4 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
58 fps -52%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
57 fps -53%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
169 fps +3%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
164 fps
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
138.6 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (95 - 175, n=17)
130.5 fps -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years)
120 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
75 fps -54%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
71 fps -57%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
60 fps -63%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
81 fps
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
58.5 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (28 - 81, n=16)
51 fps -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years)
48.5 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
42 fps -48%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
39 fps -52%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
36 fps -56%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps -56%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
96.6 fps +24%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
78 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (50 - 98, n=17)
74.6 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years)
72.1 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
71 fps -9%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
48 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
45 fps -42%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
40 fps -49%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
93 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (38 - 98, n=20)
59.6 fps -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)
51.4 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
51 fps -45%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
47 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
45 fps -52%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
44 fps -53%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
112.9 fps +14%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
99 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 131, n=22)
95.6 fps -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
92 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)
81.6 fps -18%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
57 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
54 fps -45%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
49 fps -51%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
69 fps
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
54.9 fps -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (27 - 69, n=20)
45.3 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
42 fps -39%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
40 fps -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
38.3 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
37 fps -46%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
27 fps -61%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
39 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (19 - 49, n=22)
37.6 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
37.2 fps -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
34 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)
32.9 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
25 fps -36%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
23 fps -41%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
23 fps -41%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
982789 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (692924 - 1041980, n=18)
928953 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
813876 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)
810387 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
743221 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
714551 Points -27%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
702981 Points -28%
AImark - Score v2.x
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
261820 Points +3770%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
105623 Points +1461%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
72572 Points +973%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1046 - 96317, n=14)
17097 Points +153%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6766 Points
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
5723 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6007 - 7665, n=15)
6951 Points +1%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6860 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6362 Points -7%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6287 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5839 Points -15%
System
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10927 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10334 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9273 - 11338, n=15)
10312 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
9119 Points -12%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
9085 Points -12%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5125 - 8906, n=15)
6787 Points +4%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6535 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
6248 Points -4%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6071 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5573 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points -22%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15216 - 22308, n=15)
20338 Points +11%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
18370 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15739 Points -14%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
15303 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
13588 Points -26%
Web
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1851 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1827 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1785 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1291 - 1888, n=15)
1659 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1501 Points -16%

小米12在浏览器基准测试中表现出色。即使是复杂的网站也能快速呈现,并能顺利滚动。然而,仍然没有Android 智能手机能够达到小米12的浏览器性能。 Apple iPhone 13.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
180 Points +58%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)
119.3 Points +5%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
113.8 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)
107.9 Points -5%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
90.1 Points -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
63.9 Points -44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
399.8 Points +91%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
209.7 Points
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)
209.3 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11)
195.6 Points -7%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
180.4 Points -14%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
147.5 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
77 Points -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
244 runs/min +128%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min +30%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
107 runs/min
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
104 runs/min -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)
104 runs/min -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min -31%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
46.92 runs/min -56%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
219 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
148 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)
142.9 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
136 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points -20%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
110 Points -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
62664 Points +68%
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)
45930 Points +23%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
43376 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)
42391 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)
37643 Points +1%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
37279 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
31070 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * -67%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
1417 ms * -52%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * -43%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
1034 ms * -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)
1010 ms * -9%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
930 ms *
Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93)
919 ms * +1%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
413.6 ms * +56%

* ... smaller is better

小米12的UFS 3.1存储系统以其高连续读取率确保快速加载时间。它还在连续写入和4KB的随机读/写方面提供了强大的性能,而这些性能在Android 的竞争对手中是没有的,比如说 谷歌Pixel 6,以及三星Galaxy S21 FE 5G,以及索尼Xperia 5 III都能跟上。

Xiaomi 12Google Pixel 6Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GSony Xperia 5 IIIXiaomi 12 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-55%
-34%
-31%
-2%
-16%
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
1851
1546
-16%
1639
-11%
1593
-14%
1620
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
1417
233.4
-84%
760
-46%
740
-48%
1465
3%
1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
325.2
126.2
-61%
245.1
-25%
253.4
-22%
324.9
0%
Random Write 4KB
437.5
190.3
-57%
211.2
-52%
271.3
-38%
448.9
3%

游戏--踩着刹车的游戏

有了高端的 阿德雷诺730图形单元,其120赫兹的屏幕,以及由哈曼卡顿优化的立体声扬声器,小米12带来了最佳的游戏资格。然而,这款智能手机在游戏时仍无法激发人们的热情。 虽然目前的游戏运行流畅,但至少在我们选择的测试游戏中,帧率并非我们所希望的那样。

"Asphalt 9: Legends"中我们无法从智能手机中获得超过30 FPS的帧率,尽管它应该有足够的性能储备来实现明显的高帧率。在图形简单的"Armajet"中,小米12应该真正展示其120-Hz屏幕的能力,但平均而言,它只能获得不到50FPS,这是一个令人失望的结果。我们怀疑,高热开发的 骁龙8代1破坏了智能手机的性能,导致需要对性能进行节流。

我们用我们的Gamebench测试工具。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
沥青9: 传说
沥青9: 传说
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Xiaomi 12; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø45.9 (33-68)
Xiaomi 12; Asphalt 9: Legends; 3.3.7a: Ø29.9 (27-31)

排放--有发热问题的高端SoC

温度

过热警告
过热警告

实际上,用户从骁龙8代1的高性能中得到的好处是骁龙8代1的好处是有限的,因为这款智能手机受到了发热问题的困扰。在测试中,这导致需要在每个基准测试后进行较长时间的休息,以便让智能手机充分降温。如果我们不进行休息,就会出现更多的节流现象,导致基准测试得分明显下降。

散热问题也反映在3DMark的Wild Life压力测试中。只在开始时达到最大性能,然后性能迅速下降,在测试场景的反复渲染中下降到开始水平的一半左右。 小米12甚至以过热的错误信息停止Wild Life Extreme压力测试。该智能手机还以错误信息中断了GFXBench的每个压力测试。该小米12 Pro在温度方面也遇到了同样的困难。

另一方面,在日常操作中,你可能很难注意到任何节流现象。在最高温度37.4°C(99°F)下,小米12从未感到握持不舒服,尽管我们测得的性能较低,但它从未感觉到有任何变慢。然而,在夏季室外温度较高的情况下,情况是否依然如此,或者性能下降是否会随之变得更加明显,还有待观察。

Max. Load
 36.7 °C36.1 °C35 °C 
 37 °C37 °C35 °C 
 36.9 °C35.1 °C33.4 °C 
Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 35.8 °C
34.4 °C36 °C37.4 °C
33 °C34.2 °C36.9 °C
31.3 °C33.2 °C36.7 °C
Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 (44.5min) % +73%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
63.2 (19.4min) % +37%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.6 (20min) % +27%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.1 (22.2min) % +15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 (27.4min) % +2%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46.3 (27.5min) %
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.6 (27.5-59.4)
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash: Ø27.5 (22.2-41.9)
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash: Ø22.6 (20-34.1)
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.3 (19.4-30.7)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)

发言人

小米12使用哈曼卡顿的立体声扬声器,放在智能手机的两个短边。他们的声音以平衡的中音和高音给人留下深刻印象,能够特别好地再现语言。 另一方面,它缺乏低音频率,这也使声音整体上有点单薄。

虽然小米12缺少一个音频端口,但你可以用附带的USB-C适配器代替。你还可以通过蓝牙5.2无线连接耳机或外部扬声器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203536.2253030.23121.934.14022.833.75034.839.86324.337.48023.234.710027.840.912514.744.116020.95520021.253.625017.559.831513.460.840014.160.450013.169.163011.571.580013.171.7100011.777.8125011.878.916001377.1200012.178.6250012.180.8315012.382.4400012.578.950001379.1630013.280.980001379.41000013.770.81250013.564.41600014.267.4SPL25.190.7N0.786.3median 13.1median 71.7Delta1.59.235.233.421.727.818.627.921.721.33230.825.727.927.424.424.336.816.345.218.951.717.547.212.35615.757.911.658.511.866.512.468.711.672.312.574.113.172.212.571.413.171.912.871.412.877.212.971.713.367.713.472.813.767.913.76814.46713.759.125.284.20.759.9median 13.1median 67.91.56.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 12Xiaomi 12 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 无线充电,功率高达50瓦

消耗功率

小米12包括一个67瓦的充电器。有了它,4500毫安时的电池可以在不到50分钟内完全充电。在我们的测试中,它在30分钟后达到80%。

除了有线快速充电,小米12还支持50瓦的无线充电。还支持10瓦的反向无线充电,因此它也可以为其他设备进行无线充电。

小米12的耗电量并不明显。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.7 / 1.82 Watt
Load midlight 4.68 / 7.41 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 12
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 13
3240 mAh
Google Pixel 6
4614 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
4500 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 III
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
20%
14%
-7%
-60%
3%
-24%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.6
31%
0.68
22%
1.01
-16%
1.8
-107%
0.94
-8%
1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15)
-44%
Idle Average *
1.7
1
41%
1
41%
1.5
12%
2.6
-53%
1.24
27%
2.02 ?(1.04 - 4.38, n=15)
-19%
Idle Maximum *
1.82
1.3
29%
1.02
44%
1.6
12%
3.1
-70%
1.34
26%
2.21 ?(1.15 - 4.45, n=15)
-21%
Load Average *
4.68
4.5
4%
5.39
-15%
5.54
-18%
5.3
-13%
5.7
-22%
5.49 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=15)
-17%
Load Maximum *
7.41
7.8
-5%
9
-21%
9.16
-24%
11.5
-55%
8.12
-10%
8.75 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=15)
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø7.17 (1.141-13.1)
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor: Ø5.28 (0.821-10.1)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.02 (8.51-9.65)
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.4 (9.25-12.3)
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.18 (1.054-1.884)
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.758 (0.531-1.025)

电池寿命

4500毫安时的电池为小米12提供了良好的电池寿命。在我们的模拟网络冲浪中,它可以持续12:40小时,其屏幕在播放视频近15小时后才变暗。在我们的对比设备中,只有 Apple iPhone 13持续时间甚至稍长,而 小米12 Pro而小米12 Pro则因其较大的显示屏而不能持续很长时间。

我们使用固定为120赫兹的刷新率进行了电池测试。使用60赫兹或在60和120赫兹之间动态切换的自动设置,你甚至应该获得稍长的电池寿命。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
42h 38min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 25min
Xiaomi 12
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 13
3240 mAh
Google Pixel 6
4614 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
4500 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 III
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
-6%
-15%
-4%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2558
2734
7%
2020
-21%
1430
-44%
2036
-20%
H.264
890
1224
38%
1219
37%
934
5%
788
-11%
WiFi v1.3
760
1019
34%
627
-17%
594
-22%
727
-4%
766
1%
Load
385
299
-22%
291
-24%
388
1%
337
-12%

Pros

+ 尺寸紧凑
+ 高质量的做工
+ 准确的GPS
+ 良好的主镜头和广角镜头
+ 非常明亮的AMOLED面板,120赫兹
+ 电池寿命长
+ 快速充电
+ 非常好的SoC性能 ....

Cons

- ...但有显著的节流作用
- 没有IP认证
- 存储不能扩展

对小米12的评判

测试小米12。测试装置由TradingShenzen提供。
测试小米12。测试装置由TradingShenzen提供。

小米12是一款非常好的智能手机,拥有强大的设备和性能。较小的6.28英寸的小米12的性能不亚于 小米12 Pro顶级型号,因为两者都使用 骁龙8代.在电池寿命方面,我们的测试装置甚至能够击败旗舰机,因为该机由于采用更大的6.73英寸显示屏而具有更高的功耗。

小米12的其他积极特点是高质量的设计,色彩准确的明亮AMOLED显示屏,快速准确的GPS,非常快的WiFi-6E速度,充电时间短,以及50瓦的无线充电。相比之下,50万像素的摄像头几乎看起来有点糟糕,因为它只能提供良好的照片,但不是这个价格级别的最佳照片。

小米12是一款结构紧凑、非常优雅的智能手机,性能丰富。然而,不幸的是,它也经常无法使用所有的性能。

小米12不得不接受一些关于其冷却的投诉。尽管骁龙8代的基准测试结果令人印象深刻,但它在发热问题上很挣扎。当智能手机内部变得太热时(不幸的是,这种情况很快就会发生),SoC的性能会明显下降。小米12X 小米12X在这方面做得更好。虽然它的性能足以满足日常使用的需要,但其配备的 骁龙870,它几乎不用开始节流。

最后,我们还不得不抱怨小米12缺乏IP认证,以及缺乏扩展内部存储的选项。然而,这款智能手机也与小米12X和小米12 Pro分享这些缺点。

小米12的替代品是小米12X。它的外观完全一样,使用相同的相机设置,还提供非常明亮的120赫兹显示屏。由于其更高效的骁龙870,它甚至大大超过了小米12的电池寿命。另一方面,缺点是小米12X开始时只使用Android 11,而不是Android 12,而且既不支持无线充电也不支持反向无线充电。小米12的其他替代品是 索尼Xperia 5 IIIApple iPhone 13.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可获得性

小米12可以从进口商那里买到,如TradingShenzhen起价664美元的中/英文固件,而全球或欧盟固件版本则要多花30美元。

Xiaomi 12 - 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
55 / 70 → 79%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
60 / 64 → 93%
Application Performance
87 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
73%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米12智能手机评测--一个紧凑而强大的高级包装
Manuel Masiero, 2022-03-31 (Update: 2024-08-15)