最好的可折叠拍照智能手机？谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机型评测

Name: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Brand: Google

丧失个性。

Pixel 9 Pro Fold 比上一代产品更薄、更轻，但这款可折叠手机仍将性能提升作为目标。遗憾的是，谷歌决定让其可折叠手机追随主流，而不是坚持其独特的外形设计。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/24/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Foldable Smartphone Google Pixel

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠屏评测

与 Pixel Fold 相比，Pixel 9 Pro Fold 要现代得多。谷歌的可折叠智能手机已经明显瘦身，拥有非常吸引人的折叠装置，现在还采用了最新的通信标准。但这种瘦身也导致了一些妥协。特别是，小型相机传感器并不符合谷歌手机的价格区间，这意味着 Pixel 9 Pro Fold 在弱光环境下的表现相当有限--即使是谷歌的算法也无法克服物理极限。遗憾的是，制造商已经告别了之前的外形设计，而这本可以帮助 Pixel 9 Pro Fold 从众多产品中脱颖而出。

Test device courtesy of Google Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

看看中国的竞争对手，如小米 Mix Fold 4 或Honor Magic V3，也会发现可折叠的 Pixel 手机未来仍有很大的改进空间。特别是，重量和厚边框让 Pixel 9 Pro Fold 看起来像是上一代可折叠手机的遗物。谷歌还应该重新考虑其 Pixel 10 Pro Fold 不支持手写笔的问题--Galaxy Z Fold6 提供了这一功能。

Pros

+ 高级外壳

+ 明亮的 OLED 屏幕

+ 电池续航时间长

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 更新时间长

Cons

- 低 PWM 闪烁

- 厚边框

- 相对较弱的 SoC

- 节流

价格和供应情况

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠版的起始零售价为 1499 美元，存储容量为 256 GB，可直接从制造商处购买。.如果想购买 512 GB 版本，则需要支付 1619 美元。

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Geizhals	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 84.4%	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB	Bestpreis 1699€ Saturn.de 2. 1699€ Mediamarkt.de 3. 1699€ mediamarkt	257 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8.00" 2152x2076 374 PPI OLED LTPO
2. 85.3%	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Listenpreis 1250€	226 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.98" 2488x2224 418 PPI AMOLED LPTO
3. 88.8% ^{v7 (old)}	Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Listenpreis 1200€	219 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	8.03" 2480x2200 413 PPI AMOLED
4. 86.1%	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Listenpreis 2119€	239 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.60" 2160x1856 375 PPI AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2
5. 86.3%	Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Bestpreis 1649€ Saturn.de 2. 1649€ Mediamarkt.de 3. 1649€ mediamarkt	226 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.92" 2344x2156 402 PPI OLED
6. 84.7% ^{v7 (old)}	Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2 ⎘ ARM Mali-G710 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Listenpreis 1899€	283 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.60" 2208x1840 378 PPI OLED

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠屏评测
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠屏规格
外壳 - Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机身通过了 IP 认证
功能 - 谷歌手机配备 USB 3.2
软件 - Pixel 9 Pro Fold 提供长时间更新
通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 谷歌手机配备 5G 技术
电话功能和语音质量 - Pixel 9 Pro Fold 兼容 eSIM 卡
相机 - 可折叠相机的出色照片
配件和保修 - Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机不带充电器
输入设备和操作 - 谷歌手机具有面部解锁功能
可折叠显示屏--Pixel 9 Pro Fold 采用明亮的 OLED 显示屏
外部显示屏 - 配备第二个 OLED 屏幕的 Google 手机
性能--Pixel 9 Pro Fold 拥有自己的 SoC
排放 - 谷歌手机适度节流
电池使用时间 - Pixel 手机通过了 Qi 认证
Notebookcheck 总体评分

和它的 Pixel 9 Pro Fold 一样兄弟一样一样，这款手持设备也依赖于谷歌张量 G4和 16 GB 内存。与前代产品相比，这款产品的设计明显更薄，谷歌希望跻身同类产品的前列。可折叠.在下面的评测部分中，我们将了解这款手机的继任者--Pixel Fold是否会成为一款 "可折叠手机"。像素折叠屏是否成功。

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠屏规格

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Pixel 9 Series)

Processor

Google Tensor G4 8 x 2 GHz

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G715 MP7

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

8.00 inch 1.04:1, 2152 x 2076 pixel 374 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED LTPO, cover: 6.24", 2424x1080 pixel, 16 Mio. colours, OLED, Gorilla glass Victus 2, camera hole, HDR, 60-120Hz refresh rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 229 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, Google Cast, Miracast

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B21/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B48/B66/B71), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n14/n20/n25/n26/n28/n29/n30/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n70/n71/n75/n76/n77/n78/n79/n257/n258/n260/n261), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.1 x 155.2 x 150.2

Battery

4650 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.7, 25 mm) + 10.8MP (5x optical zoom, f/3.1, 112mm) + 10.5MP (f/2.2), camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2, 23 mm, AF) + 10 MPix (f/2.2, 23 mm, AF)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, SIM tool, info material , 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+; Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LC3, Opus; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS, fanless, waterproof

Weight

257 g

Price

1899 Euro

Links

Google homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机身通过了 IP 认证

Pixel 9 Pro Fold 的厚度为 5.1 毫米，比前代产品明显更薄。前代.此外，这款可折叠智能手机的重量也轻了不少，不过Galaxy Z Fold6 的重量明显要比 Pixel 9 Pro Fold 本身轻。手机外壳由防刮的康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 组成，并符合 IPX8 防水标准--不过，Pixel 手机既不防水也不防尘。由于 8 英寸 OLED 面板周围的边框较宽，对于一款可折叠手机来说，89% 的屏占比并不是特别有效。但正面的屏幕边缘也很明显。

Pixel 9 Pro Fold 的做工质量非常好，在品质方面也不乏亮点。谷歌在新的铰链设计方面做得很好。后者看起来非常坚固，几乎可以在任何角度使用可折叠的 OLED 屏幕。

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠智能手机 Notebookcheck 评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

尺寸比较

Google Pixel Fold Vivo X Fold3 Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Honor Magic V3 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 DIN A6 ❌

尺寸比较

Vivo X Fold3 Honor Magic V3 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 DIN A6 ❌

功能 - 谷歌手机配备 USB 3.2

谷歌手机配备了蓝牙 5.3、USB OTG、NFC、UWB 芯片以及 Miracast 和 Google Cast。制造商既没有为其可折叠手机提供 1 TB 版本，也没有提供红外线温度计，不过 Pro 机型可以使用这些功能。由于采用了快速 USB 标准（3.2 Gen. 1），支持将有线图像输出到 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 接口，我们在使用三星 980 Pro（M2.SSD 硬盘）进行的拷贝测试中达到了 132 MB/s 的稳定传输速度。连接的存储介质可格式化为 NTFS（只读）或 exFAT。

软件 - Pixel 9 Pro Fold 提供长时间更新

测试期间，Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机使用了最新的Android 15 和 2024 年 11 月起的安全补丁。根据谷歌的说法，这款可折叠手机将更新七年。除了 Circle to Search 等 AI 功能外，内部助理 Gemini 也将登场。

可持续性

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠手机采用无塑料包装。根据制造商的说法，这款可折叠手机只使用了可回收的铝材，由 18% 的可回收材料制成。谷歌还提供了一份完整的可持续发展报告。.

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 谷歌手机配备 5G 技术

谷歌手机采用快速 WiFi 7 标准，包括 MU-MIMO 和 6 GHz 频段支持。在我们的测量中，当与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时，我们获得了较高且稳定的传输速度。Pixel 9 Pro 折叠手机还具备在本地和旅行时访问移动互联网所需的一切功能，包括接入 5G 和 4G 网络以及非常广泛的频率范围。这款可折叠手机甚至使用了 5G 毫米波。

Networking
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	969 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	893 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1845 (min: 924) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1843 (min: 1524) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	632 MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	892 MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	632 (min: 569) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	892 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼48%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	980 (min: 882) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	946 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	531 (min: 263) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	761 (min: 683) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	770 (min: 402) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1365 (min: 1221) MBit/s ∼74%
Honor Magic V3 Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	919 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	771 (min: 387) MBit/s ∼78%
Google Pixel Fold Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	950 (min: 481) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	920 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1714 (min: 856) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1684 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼91%
Average Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1011 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	989 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1556 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1554 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	733 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	717 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼75%

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1814 (924-1886)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (569-679)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1842 (1524-1885)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (720-981)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø969 (909-998)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø632 (569-679)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø879 (418-933)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø892 (720-981)

在我们的实际测试中，定位并不总是令人印象深刻，但由于采用了双频全球导航卫星系统，与路线的偏差很小。我们的 Garmin Venu 2 对比设备在室内测试路线上有时也会出现一些问题。

电话功能和语音质量 - Pixel 9 Pro Fold 兼容 eSIM 卡

Pixel 9 Pro Fold 支持 nano SIM 卡和 eSIM 卡双卡双待。此外，还可以输入两个 eSIM 配置文件。语音质量不错，声音还原自然。VoLTE 和 VoWiFi 功能可用于通话。

相机 - 可折叠相机的出色照片

可折叠手机的 OLED 显示屏下方和正面的一个冲孔内隐藏着一个 1000 万像素的自动对焦镜头。两个摄像头拍摄的照片几乎完全相同。不过，主摄像头和前面板打开后还可以用作自拍的取景器。

对于一款可折叠手机来说，Pixel 9 Pro Fold 的后置摄像头系统能提供不错的照片，但在黑暗环境中，小型传感器很快就会达到极限。即使是 4800 万像素的主摄像头，在白天也有不错的动态范围和稳定的清晰度，但在夜晚，几乎微小的 1/2.0 英寸传感器就不得不接受其不足之处。

超广角摄像头带有微距对焦功能，它和长焦镜头（无损五倍变焦）也都非常出色。不过，考虑到价格区间，我们认为拍摄的图像缺乏一些细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light Ultra-wide-angle Zoom 5x

click to load images

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Honor Magic V3

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Honor Magic V3

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Honor Magic V3

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Honor Magic V3

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Honor Magic V3

Canon EOS 90D

ColorChecker Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: 7.01 ∆E min: 0.71 - max: 14.06 ∆E

配件和保修 - Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机不带充电器

这款可折叠手机没有配备电源或合适的保护套。不过，它随附了一条数据线或充电线（USB-C 至 USB-C，2.0）和一个 SIM 卡工具。谷歌还为 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机提供了可选配件，如保护套。

在德国，制造商的可折叠机提供 24 个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - 谷歌手机具有面部解锁功能

得益于 120 Hz 的面板，两块电容式触摸屏反应迅速，图像变化显示流畅。遗憾的是，Google Foldable 不支持笔输入。Pixel 9 Pro Fold 则得益于线性电动马达的响应振动。此外，还可以使用三星著名的 "Flex 模式"，在折叠时扩展屏幕。

遗憾的是，谷歌并没有忠实于其旧有的长宽比，现在 Pixel 9 Pro Fold 的盖板显示屏使用的是 20:9 面板。虽然Pixel Fold 的屏幕（打开时）为 17.4:9，屏幕比例几乎与平板电脑相似，但继任者现在采用了我们熟悉的、几乎是正方形的显示格式。因此，任何潜在的购买者都应该知道，8 英寸的屏幕由于其不同寻常的长宽比，不太适合许多应用程序。

生物识别安全功能由两个 1000 万像素摄像头或开/关机按钮上的指纹传感器提供。在我们的测试中，这两种方法都能快速、可靠地解锁设备。

可折叠显示屏--Pixel 9 Pro Fold 采用明亮的 OLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏有一个 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红光、一个蓝光和一个绿光二极管组成。

8 英寸 Super Actua Flex 显示屏的像素密度为 374 ppi，略低于竞争对手。不过，显示的字体仍然足够清晰。可折叠屏幕采用 LTPO 面板，刷新率可调至 1 到 120 Hz。在我们的测量中，Pixel 9 Pro Fold 的峰值亮度达到 2,684 cd/m² (APL18)，几乎完全符合谷歌的规格（2,700 尼特）。

遗憾的是，在观看 OLED 面板时，你的眼睛会遇到低频 PWM 闪烁，频率为 240 Hz。对于 120 Hz 的 AMOLED 屏幕来说，PWM 的振幅为 24%，也是比较令人不快的。


1674 cd/m²	1538 cd/m²	1560 cd/m²
1831 cd/m²	1793 cd/m²	1799 cd/m²
1538 cd/m²	1445 cd/m²	1215 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1831 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1599.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.56 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 66 %
Center on Battery: 1793 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19

	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold OLED LTPO, 2152x2076, 8"	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 AMOLED LPTO, 2488x2224, 8"	Vivo X Fold3 AMOLED, 2480x2200, 8"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, 2160x1856, 7.6"	Honor Magic V3 OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"	Google Pixel Fold OLED, 2208x1840, 7.6"
Screen		-75%	17%	-10%	-3%	-21%
Brightness middle	1793	1111 -38%	1793 0%	1396 -22%	1019 -43%	993 -45%
Brightness	1599	1120 -30%	1806 13%	1387 -13%	1032 -35%	997 -38%
Brightness Distribution	66	99 50%	99 50%	89 35%	95 44%	94 42%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.9	3.42 -280%	0.9 -0%	1.7 -89%	1 -11%	1.4 -56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.1	5.92 -91%	2.1 32%	2.5 19%	2.2 29%	3.2 -3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	2.7 -59%	1.6 6%	1.5 12%	1.7 -0%	2.1 -24%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.206 ^100%	2.2 ^100%	2.16 ^102%	2.26 ^97%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6714 ^97%	7081 ^92%	6595 ^99%	6495 ^100%	6473 ^100%	6796 ^96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 24.04 %
Secondary Frequency: 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量。最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可以在信息框中看到。

Flex OLED 的色彩平衡非常准确。不过，由于只有两个预定义的配置文件，而且没有白平衡选项，Pixel 9 Pro Fold 看起来并没有真正跟上时代的步伐。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.541 ms rise
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.498 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.119 ms rise
5.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.828 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

可视角度非常稳定，谷歌手机在户外也给人留下了极好的印象。Pixel 9 Pro Fold 拥有足够的亮度储备，几乎可以应对任何光线环境。

外部显示屏 - 配备第二个 OLED 屏幕的 Google 手机

外盖显示屏没有采用动态 OLED 面板，但也能以最高 120 Hz 的频率工作，尺寸为 6.24 英寸。与主屏幕相比，该面板的清晰度更高（422 ppi），峰值亮度也略高，达到 2,784 cd/m²。封面显示屏也未能幸免低频闪烁的问题，在没有高频 PWM 调光的情况下，并不适合敏感的用户群体。

	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold OLED LTPO, 2152x2076, 8"	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"	Honor Magic V3 OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 AMOLED, 2376x968, 6.3"	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 x,
Screen		-7%	11%	-57%	-77%
Brightness middle	1793	2090 17%	1743 -3%	1363 -24%	968 -46%
Brightness	1599	1876 17%	1775 11%	1369 -14%	982 -39%
Brightness Distribution	66	77 17%	88 33%	94 42%	96 45%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.9	1.5 -67%	0.9 -0%	3.3 -267%	3.28 -264%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.1	3.5 -13%	2.1 32%	4.5 -45%	5.77 -86%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	1.9 -12%	1.8 -6%	2.3 -35%	2.9 -71%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.06 ^107%	2.238 ^98%
CCT	6714 ^97%	6676 ^97%	6353 ^102%	6633 ^98%	7095 ^92%

* ... smaller is better

性能--Pixel 9 Pro Fold 拥有自己的 SoC

Pixel 9 Pro 折叠版搭载了自主研发的张量 G4和 16 GB 内存。该系统在日常情况下运行流畅，但在性能方面，谷歌并没有做到出类拔萃。即使是 vivo X Fold3及其骁龙 8 代 2也能提供更强的 CPU 性能，尤其是多核性能。

集成的 Mali-G715 MP7图形芯片的性能也只能达到中端智能手机的水平。此外，该图形处理器不支持基于硬件的光线追踪。谷歌声称已与多家游戏开发商合作优化了大屏幕内部显示屏，但在日常使用中并没有太多证据表明这一点，因为许多游戏都是以宽黑边显示的。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	2239 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2184 Points +10%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2170 Points +9%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1359 Points -31%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	2098 Points +6%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1982 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (1798 - 1982, n=4)	1925 Points -3%
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1480 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3479, n=165, last 2 years)	1478 Points -25%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	6894 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6794 Points +50%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6279 Points +38%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	4882 Points +8%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	5765 Points +27%
Average Google Tensor G4 (4501 - 4820, n=4)	4650 Points +3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	4536 Points
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 10401, n=165, last 2 years)	4126 Points -9%
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	3533 Points -22%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1689 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1651 Points +20%
Average Google Tensor G4 (1372 - 1423, n=3)	1390 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1374 Points
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	1021 Points -26%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	5899 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	5898 Points +52%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	3874 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (3563 - 3874, n=3)	3741 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)	3404 Points -12%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1934541 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1685774 Points +28%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1493877 Points +13%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1390723 Points +5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1322101 Points
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=101, last 2 years)	1259783 Points -5%
Average Google Tensor G4 (1022007 - 1322101, n=3)	1161163 Points -12%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	18026 Points +39%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	17917 Points +38%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	16056 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	16234 Points +25%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	14187 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)	13055 Points +1%
Average Google Tensor G4 (11823 - 13948, n=4)	12986 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	12938 Points
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	11617 Points -10%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1473 Points +34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1102 Points
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1083 Points -2%
Average Google Tensor G4 (951 - 1102, n=4)	1039 Points -6%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	983 Points -11%
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	895 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)	894 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	10120 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	9555 Points +25%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	8798 Points +15%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	8400 Points +10%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	7637 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (6894 - 7716, n=3)	7416 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points -17%
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	5704 Points -25%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	15087 Points +88%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	14552 Points +81%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	11987 Points +49%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	11279 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +27%
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	8318 Points +3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	8038 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (7593 - 8038, n=3)	7887 Points -2%
Memory
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	11938 Points +19%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	10023 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (8573 - 10197, n=3)	9598 Points -4%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	9455 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	9073 Points -9%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	7426 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points -32%
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	4556 Points -55%
Graphics
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	34612 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	32352 Points +49%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	30845 Points +42%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	25822 Points +19%
Average Google Tensor G4 (20938 - 23041, n=3)	21902 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	21728 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points -20%
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	16243 Points -25%
Web
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1993 Points +1%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1987 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1983 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1882 Points -5%
Average Google Tensor G4 (1648 - 1983, n=3)	1837 Points -7%
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1720 Points -13%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1717 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points -21%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	37656 Points +4%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	36048 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (35227 - 36578, n=3)	35951 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	17834 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	17812 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)	17392 Points -52%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	14837 Points -59%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	12651 Points -65%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	213849 Points +14813%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)	25706 Points +1693%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	24087 Points +1580%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	17412 Points +1114%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1434 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (871 - 1434, n=3)	1150 Points -20%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	963 Points -33%
Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	496 Points -65%

Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1288 Points
Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)	824 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1308 Points
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)	746 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)	647 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	598 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (191 - 4619, n=35, last 2 years)	845 Points +107%
Average Google Tensor G4 (376 - 771, n=4)	500 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	489 Points +20%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	463 Points +13%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	326 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	409 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average Google Tensor G4 (4176 - 4754, n=4)	4480 Points +4%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	4325 Points
Average of class Smartphone (192 - 32432, n=35, last 2 years)	4196 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	498 Points -88%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	463 Points -89%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	325 Points -92%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Average Google Tensor G4 (6269 - 6451, n=4)	6333 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	6324 Points
Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=35, last 2 years)	5989 Points -5%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1091 Points -83%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	713 Points -89%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1084 Points -83%

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4693 Points +80%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4411 Points +70%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4341 Points +67%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3721 Points +43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2602 Points
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1711 Points -34%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4626 Points +79%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4235 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4021 Points +56%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3687 Points +43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2584 Points
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1760 Points -32%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18997 Points +104%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18726 Points +101%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	16021 Points +72%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	13789 Points +48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9302 Points
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6849 Points -26%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	13896 Points
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6278 Points
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7402 Points
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7362 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7290 Points
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	5273 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7694 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7487 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7345 Points
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	5289 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1511 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1503 Points +44%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1280 Points +23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1043 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1633 Points +49%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1549 Points +42%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1457 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1386 Points +27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1093 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6064 Points +5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5784 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5769 Points 0%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4973 Points -14%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3397 Points -41%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	28856 Points +75%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	25748 Points +56%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	22388 Points +36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16473 Points
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10577 Points -36%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	15231 Points +31%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	14983 Points +29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11584 Points
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9984 Points -14%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8459 Points -27%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	503 fps +19%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	487 fps +15%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	437 fps +3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	423 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	398 fps -6%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	303 fps -28%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +3%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	82 fps -30%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	375 fps +6%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	355 fps
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	322 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	299 fps -16%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	253 fps -29%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -75%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +40%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +38%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	111 fps +29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -30%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	247 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	236 fps +41%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps +32%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	196 fps +17%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	167 fps
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps -53%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89 fps +82%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	88 fps +80%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +37%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps +20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -33%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	151 fps +91%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	128 fps +62%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	122 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +53%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -38%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +76%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps +39%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps +34%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 fps +16%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -26%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	75 fps +70%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps +55%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps +36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	39 fps -11%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -34%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps +35%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78 fps +30%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps +13%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	173 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	133 fps +22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	123 fps +13%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	96 fps -12%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps -41%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35 fps +75%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps +55%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	27 fps +35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	18 fps -10%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps -30%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	172.212 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	155.837 Points +33%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	140.367 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)	121.7 Points +4%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	117.483 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (107.5 - 117.5, n=3)	111.1 Points -5%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)	106.562 Points -9%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	87.027 Points -26%
Honor Magic V3 (Performance Mode, Chrome 128)	64.069 Points -45%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	308 runs/min +69%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	237 runs/min +30%
Average Google Tensor G4 (182 - 207, n=3)	191.3 runs/min +5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	182 runs/min
Vivo X Fold3	182 runs/min 0%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)	139.5 runs/min -23%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)	127 runs/min -30%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	115 runs/min -37%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	16.5 runs/min +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	15.7 runs/min +5%
Average Google Tensor G4 (14.9 - 15.8, n=3)	15.2 runs/min +2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	14.9 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=61, last 2 years)	11.2 runs/min -25%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	8.43 runs/min -43%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	6.53 runs/min -56%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	211 Points +88%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	189 Points +69%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	158 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)	114.5 Points +2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	112 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (103 - 112, n=3)	107 Points -4%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)	101 Points -10%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	69 Points -38%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	66754 Points +7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	62374 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (56737 - 62374, n=4)	60391 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	50938 Points -18%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	49893 Points -20%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)	43817 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37721 Points -40%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	27245 Points -56%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	2065.6 ms * -191%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * -118%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)	1074.5 ms * -51%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	787.4 ms * -11%
Average Google Tensor G4 (699 - 745, n=3)	718 ms * -1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	710.4 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	554.57 ms * +22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	545.6 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4	Vivo X Fold3	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6	Honor Magic V3	Google Pixel Fold	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		90%	86%	43%	97%	-16%	-2%	5%
Sequential Read 256KB	1827.6	3984.91 118%	3556.73 95%	4115.34 125%	3825.59 109%	1606.37 -12%	1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101) -4%	1867 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 2%
Sequential Write 256KB	1126.34	3073.45 173%	3076.11 173%	2083.25 85%	3393.12 201%	1169.32 4%	1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101) 3%	1451 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 29%
Random Read 4KB	263.31	369.73 40%	387.96 47%	398.01 51%	365.48 39%	219.11 -17%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101) 9%	279 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 6%
Random Write 4KB	376.94	485.32 29%	486.21 29%	45.73 -88%	527.68 40%	238.72 -37%	319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102) -15%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) -17%

Games

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold; Dead Trigger 2; 2.0.10: Ø90.4 (85-95)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø58.3 (49-74)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø55.4 (40-61)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold; League of Legends: Wild Rift; lowest; 5.3.0.8296: Ø111.4 (90-120)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold; League of Legends: Wild Rift; High Definition; 5.3.0.8296: Ø59.3 (55-60)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.4.0: Ø58.3 (36-61)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.4.0: Ø39.3 (29-41)

排放 - 谷歌手机适度节流

温度

我们记录的表面温度参差不齐，但 Pixel 9 Pro Fold 的最高温度仅为 41 °C。在 3DMark 压力测试中，Pixel 9 Pro Fold 的节流明显比前代产品缓和。热导致的性能下降约为 20% 至 25%。

Max. Load

Idle


40.5 °C	41.2 °C	39.7 °C
37.1 °C	38.6 °C	34.4 °C
28.6 °C	28.7 °C	28.7 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 35.3 °C


37.4 °C	40.7 °C	40.6 °C
34.7 °C	38.3 °C	35.9 °C
27.4 °C	28.2 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 34.6 °C

Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78.7 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67.2 % -15%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.2 % -25%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.7 % -30%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 % -31%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50.4 % -36%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.9 % +1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76.5 %
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.4 % -13%
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.2 % -23%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.5 % -24%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.9 % -27%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	82.5 %
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.7 % -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	70.5 % -15%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.5 % -33%

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.5 (12-15.6)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.5 (17-30.4)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.7 (43.1-54.8)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø58.5 (52.4-97.2)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.03 (6.39-7.74)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.15 (7.05-12.7)

发言人

谷歌手机使用两个扬声器，共同营造出美妙的音效。折叠式扬声器的声音深度不大，但仍有一丝低音。粉红噪声的中高音也具有线性频率响应。如果您希望获得外部声音输出，可以使用带线缆的 USB 端口或蓝牙 5.3 无线技术。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池使用时间 - Pixel 手机通过了 Qi 认证

耗电量

Pixel 9 Pro Fold 闲置时的功耗接近 3 瓦，尽管考虑到了大尺寸主屏幕，但还是有点高。为了实现超薄机身，谷歌不仅在摄像头上做了妥协，而且还采用了相对较小的 4650 毫安时电池。该电池可通过电缆以 45 瓦特的功率充电。由于容量较小，充电周期仍然 "只 "需要 1.5 小时多一点。小米移动电源 25000.还可以进行无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.13 / 0.26 Watt
Idle	1.28 / 2.99 / 3.32 Watt
Load	7.25 / 19.46 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4650 mAh	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 5100 mAh	Vivo X Fold3 5500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 4400 mAh	Honor Magic V3 5150 mAh	Google Pixel Fold 4821 mAh	Average Google Tensor G4	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	36%	16%	39%	28%	25%	39%
Idle Minimum *	1.28	1.5 -17%	0.91 29%	0.83 35%	1.12 12%	0.86 33%	0.753 ?(0.48 - 1.28, n=4) 41%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Average *	2.99	1.9 36%	1.61 46%	1.3 57%	1.58 47%	1.7 43%	1.778 ?(1.1 - 2.99, n=4) 41%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 51%
Idle Maximum *	3.32	2.6 22%	1.7 49%	1.44 57%	1.66 50%	1.8 46%	2.04 ?(1.2 - 3.32, n=4) 39%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) 52%
Load Average *	7.25	5.8 20%	6.36 12%	13.57 -87%	5.9 19%	9.1 -26%	7.28 ?(7.15 - 7.44, n=3) -0%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) 10%
Load Maximum *	19.46	11.2 42%	11.26 42%	16.03 18%	5.94 69%	11.06 43%	18.8 ?(16.6 - 20.4, n=3) 3%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) 49%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.39 (0.953-15.5)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.76 (0.831-5.43)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.997 (0.963-1.246)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.15 (7.28-9.4)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.67 (5.26-11.2)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.997 (0.963-1.246)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)

电池寿命

在实际的 Wi-Fi 电池测试中，我们将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m²，8 英寸 OLED 显示屏的续航时间达到了 14.5 小时，表现非常出色。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 130)		14h 39min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4650 mAh	879 min
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 5100 mAh	968 min
Vivo X Fold3 5500 mAh	757 min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 4400 mAh	913 min
Honor Magic V3 5150 mAh	830 min
Google Pixel Fold 4821 mAh	651 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

通过 Pixel 9 Pro Fold，谷歌成功地打造了一款不错的可折叠手机，但制造商仍需在尺寸和重量上下功夫。与 Pixel Fold 相比，外形尺寸发生了巨大变化，实在令人遗憾。

Back to the verdict

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - 11/22/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

68 / 69 → 98%

Weight

87%

Battery

90%

Display

90%

Games Performance

33 / 55 → 61%

Application Performance

65 / 85 → 76%

AI Performance

65%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

70%

Average

81%

84%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
83.5%

Materials
75%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
94.9%

Repairability
60%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 85.6%

最好的可折叠拍照智能手机？谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机型评测

丧失个性。

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠屏评测

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

可能的替代品比较

Table of Contents

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠屏规格

外壳 - Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机身通过了 IP 认证

尺寸比较

尺寸比较

功能 - 谷歌手机配备 USB 3.2

软件 - Pixel 9 Pro Fold 提供长时间更新

可持续性

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 谷歌手机配备 5G 技术

电话功能和语音质量 - Pixel 9 Pro Fold 兼容 eSIM 卡

相机 - 可折叠相机的出色照片

配件和保修 - Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机不带充电器

输入设备和操作 - 谷歌手机具有面部解锁功能

可折叠显示屏--Pixel 9 Pro Fold 采用明亮的 OLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

外部显示屏 - 配备第二个 OLED 屏幕的 Google 手机

性能--Pixel 9 Pro Fold 拥有自己的 SoC

Games

排放 - 谷歌手机适度节流

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

发言人

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold audio analysis

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 audio analysis

电池使用时间 - Pixel 手机通过了 Qi 认证

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

More articles related to this device

Transparency