Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 smartphone review

小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测--超薄 8 英寸可折叠手机

极其轻巧的可折叠手机 Mix Fold 4 拥有近 8 英寸大小的 OLED 面板,但它几乎没有比普通高端手机更重更厚。这款配备了徕卡摄像头的小米手机不必躲避三星Galaxy Z Fold 6。但在我们的测试中,Mix Fold 能给我们留下深刻印象吗?
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen

此前,我们曾参观过 小型可折叠之后,我们现在来看看它的 "大哥大"。与它的 前代产品Mix Fold 4 采用了近 8 英寸的 OLED 面板,机身更加纤薄。尽管小米手机的电池容量高达 5100 毫安时,但重量却比三星 Z Fold 6 轻了 13 克。 三星Galaxy Z Fold 6.这款混合可折叠手机配备了 骁龙 8 代 3基础版的入门价格为 9,000 元人民币(约合 1,245 美元),配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。顶级版本(16 GB 内存、1 TB 存储)的售价约为 1520 美元。

遗憾的是,小米并没有在国际市场上推出 Mix Fold 4 的计划--不像小型的 混合翻盖.不过,如果你想拥有这款配备徕卡四摄像头的 XXL 折叠机,可以从中国进口。我们的合作伙伴深圳贸易公司的起价约为 1,360 美元。

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
7.98 inch, 2488 x 2224 pixel 418 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED LPTO, 2nd Screen: 6.56 inch, 1.080 x 2.520, 21:9, AMOLED, LTPO , glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 481 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G:n1 / n2/ n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n20/ n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n79, 4G: B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28 /B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48 / B66, 3G: 850/1900/2100MHz, 2G: 850/900/1800/1900MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 4.6 x 159.4 x 143.3
Battery
5100 mAh
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.7, 23 mm OIS, 1/1.49") + 50 MPix (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 47 mm, Tele ) + 10 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/2.9, 115 mm, Tele) + 12MP (f/2.2, 15 mm, ultrawide)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.2) + 16 MPix (f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, case, charger, USB cable, info material, HyperOS, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
226 g, Power Supply: 95 g
Price
1250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
85.3 %v8
10/2024
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
226 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.98"2488x2224
86.3 %v8
09/2024
Honor Magic V3
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
226 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.92"2344x2156
88.8 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Vivo X Fold3
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
219 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash8.03"2480x2200
86.1 %v8
08/2024
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750
239 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2160x1856
87.3 %v7 (old)
11/2023
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
259 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.03"2160x1916

保护套 - 小米混合折叠 4 已通过 IPX8 认证

作为一款 7.98 英寸可折叠智能手机,Mix Fold 4 的重量仅为 226 克,重量超轻。小米手机的重量与 Honor Magic V3.在折叠打开状态下,其外壳厚度仅为 4.7 毫米,确实非常出色,即使折叠闭合,Mix Fold 4 也几乎感觉不到比传统智能手机厚。

制造质量一流。由于采用了圆形金属边框,Mix Fold 4 的握持感非常舒适。虽然我们不知道背面使用了什么材料,但感觉质量很高。我们猜测 X 折叠 3-小米采用了一种塑料纤维来减轻手机的重量。

小米混合折叠 4 的配色
小米混合折叠 4 的配色

小米正面使用了自家的龙晶玻璃。与 Flip 机型相同,内部可能也使用了肖特 UTG 玻璃。得益于柔性 OLED 面板周围的窄边框,它的屏占比几乎达到了 90%。尽管 vivo X Fold 3 的无边框显示屏比例高达 91%,但这款手机的颜值还是很高的。

Mix Fold 4 的新型碳纤维铰链不仅更加坚固耐用--据制造商称,这款可折叠手机可以承受超过 500,000 次的折叠,而且还通过了 IPX8 官方认证。这意味着这款手机壳具有防水功能,在室外大雨倾盆时也能毫不犹豫地使用。由于其有限的防尘性能 Galaxy Z Fold6在耐用性方面具有额外的优势。

Mix Fold 4 的柔性 OLED 显示屏上的褶皱即使经过多次折叠和几天的使用也几乎看不出来,在日常生活中应该也很难察觉。不过,与翻盖机型相比,显示屏的折痕明显更明显。

小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测

尺寸比较

161.2 mm 143.3 mm 5.3 mm 259 g159.96 mm 142.69 mm 4.65 mm 219 g159.4 mm 143.3 mm 4.6 mm 226 g156.6 mm 145.3 mm 4.35 mm 226 g153.5 mm 132.6 mm 5.6 mm 239 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 的小米智能手机

Mix Fold 4 配备齐全,具有蓝牙 5.4、NFC、Miracast 和红外爆破器。它拥有 LPDDR5X 内存和 UFS 4.0 存储。我们测试样本的快速存储容量为 512 GB,但用户只能获得 481 GB 的可用存储空间。小米手机的内部存储无法扩展。不过,借助 USB OTG,可以轻松连接记忆棒。

与它的 小兄弟XXL 可折叠手机采用快速 USB 标准(3.2 Gen. 1),支持将有线图像输出到 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 接口。

铰链
铰链
机箱右侧(麦克风、扬声器)
机箱右侧(麦克风、扬声器)
机箱左侧(按钮:开/关、音量)
机箱左侧(按钮:开/关、音量)
机箱底部侧面(麦克风、扬声器、卡槽、UBS 端口)
机箱底部侧面(麦克风、扬声器、卡槽、UBS 端口)

软件 - 可折叠手机Android 14

Mix Fold 4 安装了制造商自己的 HyperOS,它基于最新的Android 14。1.0.11 版本的 HyperOS 具有灵活的分屏模式,最多可同时打开四个应用程序。

与中国版小米手机的惯例一样,我们的测试设备不带任何谷歌服务或 PlayStore。相反,它使用的是中国服务和小米自己的服务。即便如此,谷歌框架还是预装了,所以你只需手动安装 PlayStore。

说到软件更新,小米公司在其中文网站上一直保持低调(至少就我们使用谷歌翻译的理解而言)。目前的 小米 14 代提供了四年的Android 升级和五年的安全补丁。目前仅在中国发售的 Mix Fold 4 是否也能获得类似的持续性服务,目前尚存疑问。不过,国产 ROM 的补丁推出速度通常都很不错,但小米不会像 谷歌三星,即使是它的 Mix Fold 4。在测试时,XXL 可折叠手机运行的是 2024 年 8 月的最新安全补丁。

小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测

可持续性

我们认为,Mix Fold 4 的外包装没有使用塑料。配件采用纸板材料包装。小米没有提供任何关于手机二氧化碳排放量的信息,也没有说明是否使用了可回收材料以及使用了多少可回收材料。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 技术的小米混合折叠 4

虽然小米手机使用了包括 MU-MIMO 支持在内的快速 WiFi 7,但我们在测量过程中仅获得了不错的传输速度--Mix Fold 4 仍有一定的改进空间,尤其是在传输方面。原因在于它只能通过 2.4 和 5 GHz 范围建立连接。如果不使用频率较低的快速 6 GHz 频段,与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时,我们测定的峰值传输速率约为 900 MBit/s。不过,就其无线传输的一致性而言,几乎无可挑剔。

这款可折叠手机支持接入 5G 网络和广泛的频率范围--这同样适用于 4G 标准。中国版本甚至还包括 LTE 频段 20 和 28。值得庆幸的是,经常出差的人在使用 Mix Fold 4 时应该也很少会遇到连接问题。不过,通过天通一号系统支持的卫星通信在国内不能用于卫星电话或卫星短信。

Networking
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
iperf3 receive AXE11000
892 MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
632 MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
632 (min: 569) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
892 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼54%
Honor Magic V3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
771 (min: 387) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
919 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼92%
Vivo X Fold3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
946 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
980 (min: 882) MBit/s ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
iperf3 receive AXE11000
761 (min: 683) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
531 (min: 263) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
770 (min: 402) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1365 (min: 1221) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
994 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1867 (min: 1829) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 811) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
710 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
728 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1435 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1342 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼82%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (569-679)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1867 (1829-1894)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (720-981)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (811-1673)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø892 (720-981)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø910 (867-927)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø632 (569-679)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (919-1015)
室内定位
室内定位
外部定位
外部定位

Mix Fold 4 使用所有主要卫星系统进行定位:北斗 (B1I + B1C+ B2a)、GPS (L1+L5)、伽利略 (E1+E5) 和格洛纳斯 (L1) 以及 QZSS (L1+L5),精度高达 3 米。不过,在我们的实际测试中,小米手机的定位能力并不像你对一款支持双 GNSS 的智能手机所期望的那样好。

Mix Fold 4 在绘制我们行进路线时有时会出现较大偏差。有一次,连接甚至短暂中断。软件可能在后台进行了大量干预,以降低能耗。用于对比的 Garmin Venu 2 提供了更准确的路线。尽管如此,在日常使用中,小米手机的精确度仍足以胜任导航任务。

Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
小米混合折叠 4
小米混合折叠 4

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双 SIM 卡的小米 Mix Fold 4

小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测

小米智能手机支持完全成熟的双 SIM 卡,有两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽,但不能添加 SIM 卡配置文件。其通话质量良好,声音重现清晰。扬声器也能稳定工作。VoLTE 和 VoWiFi 功能可用于通话。

相机 - 与 Leica 合作的小米手机

正如您对可折叠智能手机的期望一样,您可以使用 Mix Fold 4 的前置摄像头和内置摄像头进行自拍。这两个摄像头的分辨率均为 1600 万像素,光圈为 f/2.2。效果看起来很均衡,实际上也相当令人印象深刻。不过,小米在最佳曝光方面也存在问题。由于采用了可折叠设计,后置摄像头模块和盖板显示屏在展开时也可用作取景器,以达到最佳效果。

该设备的背面采用了徕卡 Summilux 品牌的相机模块,内置一枚 5000 万像素的主镜头,配备 "Light Hunter 800",包括 OIS。我们已经对红米 K70 Pro 内的 1/1.55 英寸传感器进行了测试。 红米 K70 Pro的 1/1.55 英寸传感器,它在 Mix Fold 4 中配备了 f/1.7 光圈。

内摄影机
内摄影机
前置摄像头
前置摄像头
主摄像头
主摄像头

使用主摄像头拍摄的照片非常漂亮,尤其是对于一款可折叠手机来说。对焦可靠,清晰度也不错。不过,图像边缘会出现明显的模糊。即使在弱光环境下,拍摄对象的光线也很充足,光源也不会曝光过度。

机载的两个微距远摄镜头可用于变焦拍摄。这两个镜头都采用了内部液体镜头设计,包括浮动镜头组。镜头分为两组,可在内部移动,因此对焦范围从 9 厘米到(理论上)无限远。用于 2 倍变焦的 5000 万像素传感器和用于 5 倍放大的 1000 万像素潜望镜镜头提供了丰富的细节和良好的锐度。Mix Fold 4 的变焦性能比 混合翻转.

0.6x
0.6x
2x
2x
2x
2x
4x
4x
5x
5x
10x
10x
50 倍(最大值)
50 倍(最大值)

后置摄像头模块采用 1200 万像素超广角镜头,能很好地修正镜头曲率。不过,我们发现了许多图像错误,如色差。清晰度并不十分明显,但也还可以。

小米可折叠手机使用主摄像头捕捉动态图像,最高可达 24 帧/秒的 8K;UHD 画质视频的录制速度可达 60 帧/秒。以 30 帧/秒的 UHD 画质录制时,可以更换镜头,但 HDR 只有在使用主镜头时才有效。

小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightScene 4

在受控照明条件下,我们将主摄像头的色彩表现与实际参考色彩进行了对比分析。在描述 ColorChecker Passport 时,50MP 镜头显示出增亮和过饱和现象,尤其是绿色和蓝色调。Mix Fold 4 在色彩准确度方面有一些异常值(>10)。

ColorChecker
8.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Fold 4: 9.63 ∆E min: 3.17 - max: 17.85 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
22 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Fold 4: 14.19 ∆E min: 2.7 - max: 23.13 ∆E

附件和保修 - 带电源的 Mix Fold 4

小米混合折叠 4 的电源
小米混合折叠 4 的电源

交货包括一个 67 瓦快速充电电源(5V/3A、5-20V/6.2-3.25A)、一条数据线/充电线(USB-C 至 USB-C)、一个 SIM 卡工具和一本简短的使用说明书。此外,两块屏幕都预装了屏幕保护膜。在中国测试设备的交货范围内,我们的深圳借用商还为手机充电器增加了一个欧盟适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器。

我们的进口设备保修 12 个月。如果需要保修,Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的送货地址。

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的小米智能手机

两块采样率高达 240 Hz 的电容式触摸屏反应迅速,由于采用了 120 Hz 的面板,动画和菜单滚动显示非常流畅。遗憾的是,Mix Fold 4 不支持小米智能笔。重视手写笔操作的用户最好使用 Galaxy Z Fold6的 S Pen。

小米手机也支持三星的 Flex 模式,即折叠设备时的额外屏幕选项。制造商称其为悬浮模式,但其铰链并不像三星手机那样坚硬。 Galaxy 手机.你可以以 90 度角使用它,但仅此而已。一个小型线性电动马达(X 轴)负责振动,提供清晰的触觉反馈。任何可能对 Mix Fold 4 感兴趣的人在购买前都应该注意,由于其长宽比不同寻常,7.98 英寸的屏幕不太适合大多数应用程序。

生物识别安全功能通过两个 1600 万像素摄像头的 2D 技术实现人脸解锁,或通过安装在开关按钮内的指纹传感器实现。电容式传感器工作可靠,解锁速度非常快。

小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测

显示屏 - Mix Fold 4 采用 OLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。
OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。

手机内部的 7.98 英寸动态柔性显示屏分辨率为 2,488 x 2,224 像素,清晰度高达 418 ppi。这块可折叠屏幕采用 LTPO 面板(10 位),可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间调节刷新率。

在我们的测量中,Mix Fold 4 的亮度为 1,986 cd/m² (APL18),略高于小米的规格(1,700 nits,HBM)。通常只有在播放 HDR 内容时才能达到宣传的 3000 尼特峰值亮度。7.98 英寸柔性显示屏支持以下格式:杜比视界、HDR10+ 和 HDR Vivid。

为了在观看闪烁的 OLED 面板时保护眼睛,小米采用了高频 PWM 调光技术,其额定工作频率高达 2,160 Hz。不过,我们在测量中也检测到了 120 Hz 的低频闪烁,这可能是由于黑框插入(BFI)造成的--这项技术主要用于有机显示屏的烧机保护。对于 AMOLED 屏幕来说,PWM 的振幅相对较平,为 15%。

1125
cd/m²
1115
cd/m²
1120
cd/m²
1123
cd/m²
1111
cd/m²
1121
cd/m²
1120
cd/m²
1123
cd/m²
1121
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with inner display X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1125 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1119.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1111 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.206
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
AMOLED LPTO, 2488x2224, 8"
Honor Magic V3
OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"
Vivo X Fold3
AMOLED, 2480x2200, 8"
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, 2160x1856, 7.6"
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8"
Screen
25%
50%
32%
36%
Brightness middle
1111
1019
-8%
1793
61%
1396
26%
1307
18%
Brightness
1120
1032
-8%
1806
61%
1387
24%
1308
17%
Brightness Distribution
99
95
-4%
99
0%
89
-10%
96
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.42
1
71%
0.9
74%
1.7
50%
1
71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.92
2.2
63%
2.1
65%
2.5
58%
1.7
71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
1.7
37%
1.6
41%
1.5
44%
1.5
44%
Gamma
2.206 100%
2.26 97%
2.2 100%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
CCT
7081 92%
6473 100%
6595 99%
6495 100%
6313 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17171 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

亮度为 100
亮度为 100
亮度 75
亮度 75
50 % 亮度
50 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
最低亮度
最低亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和光分光计检查了显示器的色彩校准。尽管在我们的测试中,前代产品的校准更为精确,但偏差仍然很低,令人满意。 我们的测试.不过,就适应性而言,HyperOS 界面仍然堪称典范。除了三种色彩配置文件外,用户还可以在高级模式下单独调整饱和度和单个色彩值等特定参数。如果需要,还可以选择根据环境光线调整色彩。

色彩准确度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:P3)
色彩空间(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:P3)
色彩空间(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.3 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 9.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

Mix Fold 4 的外观给人留下了深刻印象。在秋季阳光下拍摄的样张中,Flex OLED 面板显示出足够的亮度储备,确保了良好的可读性。其视角稳定性和照明度都非常好。色彩也没有发生变化。

封面显示屏 - Mix Fold 4 采用 AMOLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。
OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。

外侧 21:9 的盖板显示屏也采用了动态 OLED 面板,尺寸为 6.56 英寸,分辨率为 2,520 x 1,080 像素。在我们的测试中,AMOLED 显示屏与主屏幕一样,最低刷新率为 1 Hz。根据制造商提供的数据,其峰值亮度为 3,000 尼特;在我们使用白色背景进行的测量中,该面板的亮度为 998 cd/m²,略逊于其内部显示屏。

虽然再次使用了高频 PWM 调光(2,160 Hz),但封面显示屏也未能幸免 PWM 闪烁。

998
cd/m²
976
cd/m²
977
cd/m²
989
cd/m²
968
cd/m²
985
cd/m²
959
cd/m²
988
cd/m²
995
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 998 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 981.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 968 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.238
色彩准确度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

外接显示器的色彩校准精度与主显示屏类似。同样,它的视角稳定性也非常好。只有从非常平的角度观看时,才能看到亮度略有下降。在日常使用中也不会出现色彩失真。由于屏幕亮度高、对比度强,即使是反光也几乎不成问题。

性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的可折叠手机

骁龙 8 代 3 骁龙 8 代 3在我们的案例中,Mix Fold 4 安装的是 16GB LPDDR5x 内存。在基准测试中,小米手机的成绩并没有完全接近 Z Fold6 的分数。 Galaxy Z Fold6Galaxy 版版 SoC 的 Z Fold6 的成绩,但其成绩仍然非常强劲。Mix Fold 4 的成绩明显好于 Honor Magic V3性能模式下,尤其是在 Geekbench 多核测试中。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2239 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2184 Points
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2170 Points -1%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1359 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1359 - 2329, n=20)
2163 Points -1%
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2098 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2084 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3443, n=147, last 2 years)
1409 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6894 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6794 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4882 - 7501, n=20)
6742 Points -1%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6279 Points -8%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4882 Points -28%
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5765 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5525 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 8524, n=147, last 2 years)
3932 Points -42%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1689 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1343 - 1702, n=14)
1652 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1651 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1526 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
971 Points -43%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=14)
6058 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
5899 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5898 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5005 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=174, last 2 years)
3243 Points -45%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1390723 - 2162423, n=17)
1934946 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1934541 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1685774 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1562239 Points -19%
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1493877 Points -23%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1390723 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 2162423, n=89, last 2 years)
1195104 Points -38%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (15343 - 21628, n=19)
18162 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18026 Points +11%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17917 Points +10%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16056 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16234 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15761 Points -3%
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14187 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=185, last 2 years)
12698 Points -22%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10120 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8148 - 10966, n=16)
9947 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9730 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9555 Points -6%
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8798 Points -13%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8400 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11438, n=151, last 2 years)
6192 Points -39%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15087 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14552 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 16015, n=16)
13995 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13749 Points -6%
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11987 Points -18%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11279 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10080 Points -31%
Memory
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11938 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7426 - 12716, n=16)
10611 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10136 Points -15%
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9455 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9073 Points -24%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7426 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6697 Points -44%
Graphics
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
34612 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (26972 - 39727, n=16)
34142 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
32352 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
32002 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
30845 Points
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
25822 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16365 Points -47%
Web
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2009 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1993 Points
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1987 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=16)
1962 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1882 Points -6%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1717 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (747 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1552 Points -22%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17834 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
17812 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=144, last 2 years)
16544 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=15)
16446 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15942 Points -11%
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14837 Points -17%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12651 Points -29%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
213849 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (963 - 245629, n=14)
101518 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
24087 Points -89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 245629, n=131, last 2 years)
23189 Points -89%
Vivo X Fold3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17412 Points -92%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1199 Points -99%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
963 Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (224 - 4675, n=19, last 2 years)
887 Points +81%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
489 Points
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
463 Points -5%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
326 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (279 - 489, n=6)
403 Points -18%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (213 - 32120, n=19, last 2 years)
3879 Points +679%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
498 Points
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
463 Points -7%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
325 Points -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (237 - 498, n=6)
397 Points -20%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (487 - 44381, n=19, last 2 years)
5751 Points +431%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1091 Points +1%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
713 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1084 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (542 - 1128, n=6)
894 Points -18%

集成的 Adreno 750在我们的基准测试中,虽然在要求苛刻的 3DMark 测试中已经显示出系统的节流现象,但还是证明了其强大的性能。由于可折叠 OLED 面板的分辨率很高,因此与高端手机相比,其数值相当低。 高端手机.不过,在高阶屏幕测试中,使用 Mix Fold 4 的封面屏幕所获得的数值几乎是后者的两倍(98 帧/秒)。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4693 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4411 Points
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4341 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3800 Points -14%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3721 Points -16%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4626 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4021 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3928 Points -7%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points -13%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18997 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18726 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16021 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14671 Points -8%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
13789 Points -14%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7402 Points
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7362 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7290 Points -2%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5273 Points -29%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7694 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7487 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7345 Points
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5289 Points -28%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1511 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1503 Points -1%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1280 Points -15%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1633 Points +12%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1549 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1457 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1386 Points -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
503 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps 0%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
487 fps -3%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
437 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
398 fps -21%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
375 fps
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
322 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
288 fps -23%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
253 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +8%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +7%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
236 fps -4%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
221 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
213 fps -14%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
196 fps -21%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps +33%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +31%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -12%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
151 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps -10%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
128 fps -15%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps -20%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +26%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +19%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -4%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps +25%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps +10%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +4%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -13%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -23%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
173 fps +41%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
96 fps -22%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +6%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27 fps -18%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
18 fps -45%

浏览器基准测试结果反映了 Mix Fold 4 的快速上网速度。小米手机在这方面的表现非常出色。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
172.212 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
157.504 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
155.837 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=19)
152.3 Points -12%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)
140.367 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=159, last 2 years)
115.6 Points -33%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
87.027 Points -49%
Honor Magic V3 (Performance Mode, Chrome 128)
64.069 Points -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
308 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
237 runs/min -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=16)
207 runs/min -33%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
199 runs/min -35%
Vivo X Fold3
182 runs/min -41%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
126.4 runs/min -59%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
115 runs/min -63%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
16.5 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
15.7 runs/min -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 16.5, n=10)
11.4 runs/min -31%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 33.5, n=50, last 2 years)
9.29 runs/min -44%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)
8.43 runs/min -49%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
6.53 runs/min -60%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
211 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
189 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
183 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=15)
161.7 Points -14%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)
158 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 267, n=151, last 2 years)
110 Points -42%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
69 Points -63%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
66754 Points +31%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
65418 Points +28%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
50938 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=18)
50709 Points 0%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)
49893 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 98997, n=195, last 2 years)
35729 Points -30%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
27245 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
2065.6 ms * -279%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)
1643 ms * -201%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (546 - 2066, n=16)
841 ms * -54%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)
787.4 ms * -44%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
653.8 ms * -20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
554.57 ms * -2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
545.6 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Mix Fold 4 采用了速度极快的 UFS 4.0 存储系统,在我们的测量过程中始终保持着较高的速度。

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Honor Magic V3Vivo X Fold3Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
4%
-2%
-28%
-2%
-2%
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB
3984.91
3825.59
-4%
3556.73
-11%
4115.34
3%
3572.73
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
3073.45
3393.12
10%
3076.11
0%
2083.25
-32%
2897.27
-6%
Random Read 4KB
369.73
365.48
-1%
387.96
5%
398.01
8%
389.81
5%
Random Write 4KB
485.32
527.68
9%
486.21
0%
45.73
-91%
506.41
4%

游戏 - 小米混合折叠 4 无法达到 120 帧/秒

我们使用GameBench应用程序来了解游戏在 Mix Fold 4 的 7.98 英寸显示屏上运行的流畅度,以及小米折叠手机是否适合 HFR 游戏。在录制过程中,我们没有达到最高可能的 120 fps。不过,我们测试的Android 游戏比 Flip 机型运行得更流畅、更稳定。

对图形要求较高的《源氏冲击》在高图形设置下很容易玩,但在奇幻动作角色扮演游戏中不时出现图形错误和轻微掉帧。在第二款游戏《PUBG Mobile》中,我们解锁了 UHD 模式,并在低图形设置下获得了 "极限 "帧率。这让我们在很短的时间内达到了 90 帧/秒,但之后,Mix Fold 4 只能达到 50 帧/秒左右。显然,软件方面似乎缺乏优化。

PUBG 手机
PUBG 手机
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø51.4 (24-60)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø55.3 (29-61)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø49.1 (43-90)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.9 (58-61)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (39-41)

排放 - 设有热点区域的小米手机

温度

Mix Fold 4 配备了真空室液体冷却装置,在日常使用中可保持机身凉爽。不过,我们注意到摄像头周围有一个明显的热点区域。在负载情况下,我们测得的最高温度超过 53 °C。在使用 Burnout 基准进行一小时的压力测试后,我们确定了这一高发热量,这也导致 3DMark 基准测试中的性能大幅下降。压力测试导致热引起的节流约为 50%。

Max. Load
 53.6 °C42.4 °C37.7 °C 
 52.5 °C37.7 °C31.9 °C 
 30.3 °C30 °C29.3 °C 
Maximum: 53.6 °C
Average: 38.4 °C
34.6 °C40.9 °C43.9 °C
32.9 °C39.1 °C44.7 °C
29.7 °C30.5 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 36.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.9 % +35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % +24%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.2 % +10%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.7 % +1%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.2 % +43%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.9 % +38%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.4 % +19%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.5 % +5%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.9 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.7 % +41%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 % +18%
Vivo X Fold3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 % +17%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.3 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.7 % +29%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.5 % +27%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.5 %
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.5 (17-30.4)
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.8 (14.8-25.4)
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.6 (11.4-17.2)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.9 (19.3-25.1)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.5 (18.5-23.1)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø58.5 (52.4-97.2)
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø62.5 (50.9-85.9)
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø53.6 (43.2-79.1)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.6 (65.2-97)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø66.5 (61.2-83.9)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø80.8 (69.3-118.6)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø20.4 (18.8-28.2)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.4 (14-28.3)
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18.9 (13.9-23.9)
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.5 (9.94-17.2)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø20.4 (18.9-27.1)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.15 (7.05-12.7)
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.68 (8.38-11.7)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.5 (9-12.8)

发言人

Mix Fold 4 内置的两个扬声器音质出色,低音轻盈,中高音线性。有线耳机可通过 USB 端口连接。如果您喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线音频输出,您可以选择多种编解码器(SBC、AAC、AptX、AptX HD、AptX Adaptive、LDAC、LHDC V5、LC3)和 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.835.42539.841.23129.134.44029.533.15032.7376321.927.58014.621.510017.530.412520.238.916027.245.220021.24925018.354.131521.558.240021.25750018.958.963018.860.880018.768.7100016.270.6125014.570.116001271.6200012.269.3250014.161.7315016.465.7400018.161.7500021.362.8630019.565.9800024.266.31000017.864.71250018.561.11600020.261SPL30.879.2N1.444median 18.7median 61.7Delta2.25.938.444.731.235.525.129.829.931.832.131.923.127.523.625.922.434.316.840.616.548.913.447.314.154.912.953.81359.511.768.211.670.612.97413.377.713.175.712.474.712.673.412.574.312.475.812.775.613.176.313.57713.674.913.474.613.670.613.464.525870.671.3median 13.1median 73.41.28.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mix Fold 4Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

耗电量

Mix Fold 4 支持最高 50 瓦的无线充电和最大 67 瓦的有线充电。在测试过程中,使用附带的快速充电适配器,我们需要约 55 分钟才能为 5100 毫安时电池充电,30 分钟后达到约 60%。如果不想使用中国插头的适配器,也可以使用小米手机的标准快充电源适配器(QC 2-4、PD2.0、PD3.0、PPS)。

我们测量了 Mix Fold 4 的大屏幕功耗。作为一款可折叠的 XXL 手机,它的负载功耗相对较低,约为 6.5 瓦,但它的前代产品 前代产品的功耗则更低,闲置时约为 1 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.5 / 1.9 / 2.6 Watt
Load midlight 5.8 / 11.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
5100 mAh
Honor Magic V3
5150 mAh
Vivo X Fold3
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
4400 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
4800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
25%
16%
-11%
-15%
16%
22%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
1.12
25%
0.91
39%
0.83
45%
0.86
43%
0.859 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=15)
43%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.58
17%
1.61
15%
1.3
32%
1.05
45%
1.231 ?(0.81 - 1.9, n=15)
35%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
1.66
36%
1.7
35%
1.44
45%
1.07
59%
1.363 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=15)
48%
Load Average *
5.8
5.9
-2%
6.36
-10%
13.57
-134%
15.27
-163%
8.74 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=14)
-51%
Load Maximum *
11.2
5.94
47%
11.26
-1%
16.03
-43%
17.78
-59%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.76 (0.831-5.43)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.31 (0.866-14.4)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.773 (0.702-0.896)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.67 (5.26-11.2)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.31 (8.17-10.8)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.773 (0.702-0.896)

运行时间

这款可折叠手机使用 7.98 英寸显示屏的运行时间和 150 cd/m² 的调整后显示屏亮度与其前代产品相当。 前代产品在 WLAN 测试中,运行时间为 16 小时,视频播放时间接近 24 小时--我们的对比设备最好采用统一亮度。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 27min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 129)
16h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 41min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 04min
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
5100 mAh
Honor Magic V3
5150 mAh
Vivo X Fold3
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
4400 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
4800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-17%
-22%
-6%
1%
Reader / Idle
2067
1692
-18%
2132
3%
H.264
1421
1043
-27%
1371
-4%
WiFi v1.3
968
830
-14%
757
-22%
913
-6%
923
-5%
Load
244
223
-9%
270
11%

Pros

+ 出色的显示屏
+ 快速存储和 SoC
+ 纤薄轻巧
+ 出色的摄像头
+ 快速充电 + 电源
+ 运行时间长

Cons

- 不支持 6 千兆赫
- 定位不足
- 更新交付不明确
- 高温和节流
- 仅作为进口设备提供

小米混合折叠 4 的评价

小米 Mix Fold 4 评测。测试设备由
小米 Mix Fold 4 评测。测试设备由

由于其令人印象深刻的构造,Mix Fold 4 是市场上最令人兴奋的可折叠智能手机之一。与 Galaxy Z 折叠 6相比,小米手机在重量和机身厚度方面确实给人下一代可折叠手机的感觉。虽然 Mix Fold 4 的新型碳铰链使其获得了 IPX8 认证,但这是以相对明显的折痕为代价的--在 Z Fold 6 上几乎看不到折痕了。 翻盖机型上几乎看不到折痕了。

作为一款可折叠手机,小米为其 7.98 英寸智能手机配备了非常出色的徕卡相机模块和强大的连接功能。不过,在日常使用过程中,Mix Fold 4 并不总是能达到其数据表所显示的高标准--例如,WiFi 7 标准不支持 6 GHz,双 GNSS 在实际使用中会出现意想不到的误差。不过,Mix Fold 4 的超长续航时间、快速充电功能和配套的电源装置是它的一大亮点。

Mix Fold 4 展示了未来 XXL 可折叠设备的潜力。不过,平板电脑的长宽比最好能更常见一些。

由于极薄的设计,小米可折叠手机存在与 Honor Magic V3的问题,即 骁龙 8 代 3的高跳频和明显的发热问题。此外,小米并不允许其 XXL 折叠手机全球上市,因此其系统语言仅限于英语。在这方面 vivo X 折叠 3的多语言支持则更具优势。

价格和供应情况

例如,您可以通过深圳贸易公司以 1360 美元左右的价格购买小米 Mix Fold 4 进口设备。

请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 - 10/02/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
66 / 69 → 96%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
33 / 55 → 60%
Application Performance
73 / 85 → 86%
AI Performance
33%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
67 / 90 → 75%
Camera
84%
Average
68%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
95.3%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
53.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 51.4%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 Mix Fold 4 智能手机评测--超薄 8 英寸可折叠手机
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-10- 8 (Update: 2024-10- 8)