Notebookcheck Logo
Google Pixel 9 Pro

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 智能手机评测--配备出色摄像头的紧凑型旗舰手机

小型 AI 强国。

6.3 英寸的 Pixel 9 Pro 比上一代产品能做更多的事情，在这次测试中，它证明了自己无愧于目前市场上最好的紧凑型智能手机之一的称号。遗憾的是，它也并非完全没有弱点。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen

对谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 的评价

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 属于目前市场上最好的紧凑型智能手机。它的摄像头证明了其强大的综合实力，提供了非常好的图像质量，涵盖了从微距到长焦的所有拍摄场景。Pixel 9 Pro 的高品质制造、明亮的 OLED 面板、超长的电池续航时间、大量实用的 AI 功能和 7 年的更新也是非常吸引人的特点。此外，它的通信功能也无可挑剔，因为这款手机支持 NFC、UWB、WiFi 7 和大量蜂窝频率。

遗憾的是，由于谷歌 Tensor G4 的速度相对较慢，Pixel 9 Pro 的性能比较一般，UFS-3.1 存储也意味着它无法跟上市场上其他旗舰手机的步伐。令人遗憾的是，入门级存储版本又只配备了 128 GB 存储空间，这在 2024 年已经不再是最新的配置了。此外，我们还不得不批评它充其量只有 27 瓦的缓慢充电速度，因为虽然它能保护手机电池，但也可能会有点考验你的耐心。

Pros

+ 明亮的 LTPO OLED 面板
+ 高品质外壳
+ 功能强大
+ 超长更新周期
+ 大量 5G 和 4G 频率
+ 出色的主摄像头和长焦镜头

Cons

- 充电慢 + 无电源耗电量大，耗电快
- 耗电量大，耗电快
- SoC 更接近中端水平
- 存储速度不是特别快
- 基本版本只有 128GB
- 低频 PWM

价格和供应情况

您可以通过亚马逊等大多数主要在线零售商购买谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro，目前售价为 987.99 美元。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
85.7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Bestpreis 875.99€ notebooksbilliger.de
2. 887.74€ galaxus
3. 900.99€ Mindfactory
199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2856x1280
495 PPI
OLED
2.
87.9%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro ⎘
Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
Bestpreis 1079€ Coolblue
2. 1090.69€ Mindfactory
3. 1090.7€ galaxus
199 g128 GB NVMe6.30"
2622x1206
460 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
3.
89% v7 (old)
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Listenpreis 1099€213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2992x1344
490 PPI
OLED
4.
88.1%
OnePlus 12
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Bestpreis 657€ Coolblue
2. 728.85€ electronis.de
3. 728.85€ Jacob Elektronik direkt
220 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
5.
89.8% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Bestpreis 799€ Gomibo.de
2. 839€ ab-handelsgesellschaft-mbh
3. 849€ galaxus.at
196 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
3120x1440
513 PPI
AMOLED
6.
84.8%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Bestpreis 731€ Gomibo.de
2. 734.9€ alza.de
3. 742€ Gomibo.at
209 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 是继 Pixel 8 Pro.虽然它的整体设计没有太大变化，但尺寸却从 6.7 英寸缩小到了 6.3 英寸。这使得 Pixel 9 Pro 的尺寸与 像素 9完全相同，从而成为目前市场上最小巧的高端智能手机之一。目前最大的 Pixel 智能手机是 像素 9 Pro XL.

与前代产品相比，我们的测试机拥有更强的性能，这要归功于它的 谷歌张量 G4和新的串联式 OLED 面板，使其更加闪亮。虽然电池容量从 5050 毫安时略微缩水到 4700 毫安时，但我们的测试显示，Pixel 9 Pro 比 Pixel 8 Pro 拥有更强的续航能力。

谷歌没有改变这款手机的价格。我们测试的是入门级版本，存储容量仍为 128 GB。谷歌为此收费999美元，与Pixel 8 Pro持平。

规格

Google Pixel 9 Pro (Pixel 9 Series)
Processor
Google Tensor G4 8 x 2 GHz
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G715 MP7
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.30 inch 20:9, 2856 x 1280 pixel 495 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, brightness up to 3000 nits, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 98.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer, USB-OTG, UWB, eSIM
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/21/25/26/28/29/30/32/38/39/40/41/42/48/66/71/75), 5G (Band n1/2/3/5/7/8/12/14/20/25/26/28/30/38/40/41/66/71/75/76/77/78/79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 152.8 x 72
Battery
4700 mAh Lithium-Ion, up to 27W wired charging, 21W wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (1/1.31", f/1.68, 82°, OIS) + 48 MPix (5x optical zoom, 1/2.55", f/2.8, 22°) + 48 MPix (Ultra Wide / Makro, 1/2.55", f/1.7, 123°), Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 42 MPix (f/2.2, Dual PD, AF, 103°)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-C cable (USB 2.0), SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, Titan M2 Security Chipset, DRM Widevine L1, HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+; Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LC3, Opus; Dual-Band-GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS, NavIC), Google Cast, Head SAR 0.99 W/kg, Body SAR 1.37 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
199 g
Links
Google homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 6.3 英寸，通过 IP68 认证

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 的制造质量令人印象深刻，其 IP68 等级可有效防水防尘。智能手机的正面和背面各由一块大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 保护，并由抛光金属框架连接在一起。后盖采用丝绸哑光表面处理，质感极佳。涂层还使后盖在很大程度上不易留下指纹痕迹。

我们的测试设备采用的是Hazel（深灰色）配色。该手机还有三种颜色可供选择，分别是瓷色（浅米色）、玫瑰石英色和黑曜石色（黑色）。

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro

尺寸比较

❌
164.3 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 220 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g160.4 mm 75.1 mm 8.39 mm 209 g158.5 mm 75.9 mm 7.7 mm 196 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 199 g149.6 mm 71.5 mm 8.25 mm 199 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 配备 UWB 芯片和红外温度计的 Google 智能手机

谷歌提供 128、256 和 512 GB UFS 3.1 存储版本的 Pixel 9 Pro，每个版本都配备 16 GB 内存。我们的 128 GB 测试机在谷歌商店的售价为 999 美元。内部存储无法扩展。

除了 NFC 和蓝牙 5.3，Pixel 9 Pro 还支持 Miracast 和 Google Cast。内置的 Titan M2 芯片有助于安全地存储密码和用户数据。与 Pixel 9不同的是，Pro 配备了 UWB 芯片和红外测温仪。

手机的 OTG 就绪 USB 端口是按照 USB 3.2 Gen 1 标准连接的，因此理论上可以确保超过 250 MB/s 的传输速率。不过，使用我们的外置 三星 PSSD T7固态硬盘进行复制测试时，USB 端口的传输速率仅为 180.1 MB/s。我们通常使用的三星 990 Pro 固态硬盘没有被识别为存储设备，这可能是因为 USB 端口无法提供足够的输出电压。

左：带声波指纹传感器的电源按钮，音量摇杆
左：带声波指纹传感器的电源按钮，音量摇杆
右：无连接
右：无连接
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部：双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen 1、扬声器
底部：双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen 1、扬声器

软件 -Android 14 和 Pixel 9 Pro 的 7 年更新

据制造商称，预装的Android 14 将在 7 年内获得操作系统升级和安全更新。后者每月推出一次。在测试时（11 月底），这款智能手机已经升级到Android 15。

人工智能是这一代 Pixel 的核心。因此，Pixel 9 Pro 也配备了 Circle to Search 和 Gemini 智能助手等人工智能功能，这并不令人意外。Pro 机型还包括 Gemini Advanced 和 1 年免费的 2 TB 云存储空间。

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro

可持续性

谷歌不仅通过其漫长的更新周期，而且通过其材料的选择，高度重视可持续发展。根据制造商的可持续发展报告在这款智能手机 199 克的总重量中，有 32 克是 100% 的再生铝。在 Pixel 9 Pro 的 15 个塑料部件中，有 10 个是用回收材料制成的。包装完全不使用塑料。谷歌称，这款手机的碳足迹为 72 千克。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 高速 WiFi 7 和良好的全球定位系统

Pixel 9 Pro 是一款真正的 "世界手机"。它的手机频率覆盖范围非常广，几乎在任何地方都能获得无线信号。

在短距离内，谷歌智能手机使用 WiFi 7 工作，它还支持 6 GHz Wi-Fi。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用时，该智能手机的数据传输速率高且稳定。

Networking
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
795 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1830 (min: 1666) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1602 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼95%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
622 (min: 487) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
921 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
969 (min: 436) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 1360) MBit/s ∼82%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼87%
OnePlus 12
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1119 (min: 1086) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1857 (min: 1766) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
859 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
648 (min: 582) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1581 (min: 1247) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1117 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼66%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
986 (min: 498) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
931 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1894 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1695 (min: 1643) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1012 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
992 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1529 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1552 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
723 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
708 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1438 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1383 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼82%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1830 (1666-1889)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1581 (1247-1658)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1601 (1387-1829)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (1031-1173)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø955 (858-990)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø846 (401-943)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø794 (680-916)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (582-790)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收

Pixel 9 Pro 使用双频 GNSS 和所有全球卫星导航服务来确定当前位置。与我们测试期间作为参考设备的 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比，它的定位并不总是完全准确，但对于日常使用仍然完全足够。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：环湖旅行
GPS 测试：环湖旅行
GPS 测试：转折点
GPS 测试：转折点

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 卡的 Pixel 9 Pro

Pixel 9 Pro 有一个 SIM 卡插槽，支持 eSIM 卡。您也可以激活两个 eSIM 卡。支持 VoLTE 和 VoWiFi。

谷歌手机的通话质量非常好，即使在嘈杂的环境中也能可靠地过滤掉背景噪音。在免提模式下，清晰度几乎一样高。

相机 - 搭载强大三摄像头和 8K 视频的 Google Pixel 9 Pro

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

由于采用了三摄像头设置，Pixel 9 Pro 拥有 4800 万像素潜望镜变焦，而 Pixel 9 Pro 则是 4800 万像素。 像素 9所没有的 4800 万像素潜望镜变焦，可实现 5 倍光学放大。数字放大倍数最高可达 30 倍。我们非常喜欢用光学变焦范围内的长焦摄像头拍摄的照片。背面的其他摄像头--5000 万像素广角镜头和 4800 万像素超广角镜头--与 Pixel 9 上的完全相同。总的来说，你能获得色彩中性的出色照片。

与 Pixel 9 相比，Pixel 9 Pro 的自拍摄像头也有了质的飞跃，因为它现在使用的是 4200 万像素自动对焦镜头，而不是 1000 万像素摄像头。像素二进制技术用于组合 4 个相邻像素，从而生成 1000 万像素的照片。这些照片拥有高水平的细节和和谐的色彩描绘。

Pixel 9 Pro 可通过自拍摄像头拍摄高质量的视频，最高可达每秒 60 帧的 4K。不过，视频的稳定性不是很好。分辨率更高的主摄像头在这方面做得更好。使用该镜头，你可以期待以每秒 30 帧的速度拍摄 8K，而 4K 的 FPS 限制也是每秒 60 帧。夜视或全景等 AI 支持的拍摄模式可以让你尽情尝试，而且效果也不错。

使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
5 倍变焦
5 倍变焦
2 倍变焦
2 倍变焦
无变焦照片
无变焦照片
超广角摄像头
超广角摄像头

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo

在我们的测试实验室中，我们考察了主摄像头在受控照明条件下再现 ColorChecker 测试图参考色彩的能力。总体而言，我们没有发现重大异常。只有在淡青色和深棕色色调方面与目标值（Delta-E > 10）略有偏差。

ColorChecker
11.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 9 Pro: 7.18 ∆E min: 3.02 - max: 12.76 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.4 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
75.3 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
82 ∆E
70.5 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 9 Pro: 46.01 ∆E min: 13.99 - max: 82.01 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不带电源的 Google 智能手机

Pixel 9 Pro 薄薄的包装内几乎没有任何附件。只有一条 USB-C 线缆（USB 2.0）、几张宣传单和一个 SIM 卡针。45 瓦电源适配器和各种保护套等配套配件可通过谷歌商店购买。

谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 提供 12 个月的保修服务。制造商打算提供 7 年的原装备件，但不是直接提供，而是通过其合作伙伴 iFixit 的在线商店提供。

输入设备和操作 - Pixel 9 Pro 采用 120 Hz 的 LTPO OLED 面板

得益于 120 Hz 的刷新率，Pixel 9 Pro 的 161 毫米 LTPO 显示屏操作起来感觉超级流畅，整个触摸屏都能精确地执行输入。其线性振动电机可提供精确的反馈。

集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器使用超声波传感器工作，与光学传感器相比，能确保更高的精确度。在我们的测试中，手指很快就能被识别出来。此外，还可以通过自拍摄像头进行二维面部识别，从而实现生物识别身份验证。虽然这种方式的安全性要低得多，但在光线充足的条件下，解锁智能手机同样可靠。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - Pixel 9 Pro 内部采用超亮串联式 OLED 显示屏

子像素
子像素

这款手机的 6.3 英寸 OLED 面板分辨率为 2,856 x 1,280 像素，像素密度高达 495 PPI。除了 HDR10 和 HDR10+ 外，它还支持 HLG。

与 像素 9相比，Pixel 9 Pro 采用了 LTPO OLED 面板，因此可以在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节刷新率。它的亮度水平也比标准版 Pixel 已经破纪录的水平更高。

在描绘全白背景时，Pixel 9 Pro 的平均亮度高达 2016 cd/m²，在同类产品中无与伦比。但遗憾的是，其亮度分布并不均匀（照度仅为 84%）。当显示较小的图像部分时（APL18），谷歌智能手机的亮度增加到了 3,101 cd/m²。在 HDR 模式下，我们测得的亮度仍然高达 2,970 cd/m²。

在我们测量的所有亮度下，Pixel 9 Pro 的 OLED 面板闪烁频率为 240 Hz，并不算高。不过，闪烁幅度低于 20%，因此即使是敏感用户也不会有任何抱怨。不过，如果有疑问，您还是应该在购买前亲自试用一下这款智能手机。

2139
cd/m²		2132
cd/m²		1888
cd/m²
2175
cd/m²		2083
cd/m²		1875
cd/m²
2051
cd/m²		1964
cd/m²		1833
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 2175 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 2015.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.34 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 2083 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Google Pixel 9 Pro
OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"		Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"		Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.7"		OnePlus 12
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy S24+
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"		Xiaomi 14T Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-34%
-41%
-58%
-106%
-18%
Brightness middle
2083
1034
-50%
1510
-28%
1026
-51%
1358
-35%
953
-54%
Brightness
2016
1034
-49%
1467
-27%
991
-51%
1358
-33%
961
-52%
Brightness Distribution
84
98
17%
92
10%
91
8%
92
10%
95
13%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.7
0.98
-40%
1.1
-57%
1.19
-70%
3
-329%
0.9
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2
2.76
-38%
3.8
-90%
3.3
-65%
4.4
-120%
1.5
25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
1.6
-45%
1.7
-55%
2.4
-118%
2.5
-127%
1.2
-9%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.17 101%
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
1.98 111%
2.22 99%
CCT
6560 99%
6638 98%
6670 97%
6920 94%
6656 98%
6580 99%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
Amplitude: 16.62 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8698 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

Pixel 9 Pro 为用户提供的显示调节选项很少，只有两种色彩配置文件（自然、自适应）。反过来说，你也不需要配置太多，因为 OLED 面板的色彩描绘确实相当不错，而且在选择自然色彩模式时最为准确。

色彩精度（色彩模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（色彩模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5135 ms rise
↘ 0.53 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.589 ms rise
↘ 1.693 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于亮度高，Pixel 9 Pro 非常适合在户外使用。只是最好不要关闭亮度传感器，否则，可视角度稳定的屏幕 "最多 "只能达到 1,212 cd/m² 的亮度。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 谷歌张量 G4 将重点放在人工智能上

Pixel 9 Pro 依赖于一款名为 谷歌张量 G4据说它具有很高的人工智能性能。然而，在人工智能基准测试中，这款谷歌智能手机的速度并不是最快的。在安兔兔 v10 等 "权威 "基准测试中，Tensor G4 无法与当前任何高端 SoC 相媲美，因为它们都能提供更强的 CPU 性能。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3443 Points +75%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2187 Points +11%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2148 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
2066 Points +5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1971 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1798 - 1982, n=4)
1925 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=177, last 2 years)
1488 Points -25%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8524 Points +77%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
6972 Points +45%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6630 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
6534 Points +36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4820 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (4501 - 4820, n=4)
4650 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=177, last 2 years)
4173 Points -13%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
2437 Points +78%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1672 Points +22%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1598 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1567 Points +14%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1372 - 1423, n=3)
1390 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1372 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1044 Points -24%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
6687 Points +77%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
6478 Points +71%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6088 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
5871 Points +55%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3787 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (3563 - 3874, n=3)
3741 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3484 Points -8%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2088406 Points +83%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2005881 Points +76%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1867306 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1777871 Points +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=108, last 2 years)
1311330 Points +15%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1022007 - 1322101, n=3)
1161163 Points +2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1139380 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
17534 Points +48%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16053 Points +36%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15690 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=198, last 2 years)
13213 Points +12%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (11823 - 13948, n=4)
12986 Points +10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
11823 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1455 Points +43%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1304 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1290 Points +26%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (951 - 1102, n=4)
1039 Points +2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1021 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
956 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=166, last 2 years)
924 Points -10%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11976 Points +55%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10522 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
9467 Points +23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7716 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (6894 - 7716, n=3)
7416 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=160, last 2 years)
6457 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
Points -100%
System
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
15367 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
15253 Points +90%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14531 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=160, last 2 years)
10301 Points +28%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8029 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (7593 - 8038, n=3)
7887 Points -2%
Memory
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11357 Points +11%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11254 Points +10%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10197 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
10178 Points 0%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (8573 - 10197, n=3)
9598 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)
7010 Points -31%
Graphics
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
58323 Points +153%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38959 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
25796 Points +12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
23041 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (20938 - 23041, n=3)
21902 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)
17924 Points -22%
Web
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2037 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1998 Points +6%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1907 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1879 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1648 - 1983, n=3)
1837 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)
1571 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
55033 Points +50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36578 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (35227 - 36578, n=3)
35951 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points -26%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18127 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years)
17765 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
11342 Points -69%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
43121 Points +3663%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33743 Points +2844%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=144, last 2 years)
25149 Points +2095%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1473 Points +29%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (871 - 1434, n=3)
1150 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1146 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1121 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -3%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
4619 Points +1128%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
976 Points +160%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=42, last 2 years)
784 Points +109%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (376 - 771, n=4)
500 Points +33%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
488 Points +30%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
376 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
31973 Points +666%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (4176 - 4754, n=4)
4480 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
4189 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4176 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=42, last 2 years)
3765 Points -10%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
487 Points -88%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
44187 Points +605%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (6269 - 6451, n=4)
6333 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
6269 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=42, last 2 years)
5410 Points -14%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
3975 Points -37%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1128 Points -82%

配备了 ARM Mali-G715 MP7和 谷歌张量 G4在 GPU 性能方面也只取得了平均成绩。至少，与 Pixel 8 Pro 相比，它的性能略有提升。 像素 8 Pro.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4331 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points +63%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
3987 Points +53%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3866 Points +48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -7%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
4628 Points +82%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4444 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4256 Points +67%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3808 Points +50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -5%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
17967 Points +90%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17681 Points +87%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
13588 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13098 Points +38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -6%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1647 Points +61%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1598 Points +56%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1499 Points +46%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1806 Points +80%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1667 Points +67%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1565 Points +56%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
7982 Points +42%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7385 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7199 Points +29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5602 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points -10%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30100 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23545 Points +44%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
22189 Points +36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16300 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17879 Points +56%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
15904 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15675 Points +37%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11444 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points -13%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
58 fps -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
738 fps +78%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
539 fps +30%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
518 fps +25%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
378 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -16%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps 0%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
58.5 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
478 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
310 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
300 fps +22%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps +20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +11%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -42%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.6 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps +63%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
244 fps +48%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
237.3 fps +44%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps +40%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -32%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +26%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +11%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps +11%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
154.7 fps +82%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
147 fps +73%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
139 fps +64%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -12%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +45%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +34%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.5 fps +27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps +70%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps +70%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
69.3 fps +58%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -16%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +55%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +8%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.8 fps -22%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps +58%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps +57%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
176.1 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps +48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -18%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +75%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps +70%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps +70%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
29.6 fps +48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -20%

在浏览器基准测试中，Pixel 9 Pro 的性能表现平平。不过，这在上网时并不明显，因为网页加载速度很快。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
386.723 Points +257%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
215.5 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
139.087 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
125.1 Points +15%
Average Google Tensor G4 (107.5 - 117.5, n=3)
111.1 Points +2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
108.429 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
77.674 Points -28%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
569 runs/min +175%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
289 runs/min +40%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
260 runs/min +26%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
207 runs/min
Average Google Tensor G4 (182 - 207, n=3)
191.3 runs/min -8%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min -24%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.7 runs/min -31%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
138 runs/min -33%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
33.5 runs/min +112%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
15.8 runs/min
Average Google Tensor G4 (14.9 - 15.8, n=3)
15.2 runs/min -4%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
14.9 runs/min -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=68, last 2 years)
12.1 runs/min -23%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
6.55 runs/min -59%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
267 Points +152%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
212 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
176 Points +66%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years)
117.8 Points +11%
Average Google Tensor G4 (103 - 112, n=3)
107 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
106 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
78 Points -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
98997 Points +63%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
68223 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
63452 Points +5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
60566 Points
Average Google Tensor G4 (56737 - 62374, n=4)
60391 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=212, last 2 years)
38666 Points -36%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
25646 Points -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
2123.5 ms * -204%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=168, last 2 years)
1519 ms * -117%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * -20%
Average Google Tensor G4 (699 - 745, n=3)
718 ms * -3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
699 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
630.8 ms * +10%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
624.1 ms * +11%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
276.9 ms * +60%

* ... smaller is better

虽然该智能手机的 UFS 3.1 存储系统可确保较短的加载时间，但其数据吞吐量远远落后于其他高端机型。

Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Pixel 8 ProOnePlus 12Samsung Galaxy S24+Xiaomi 14T ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-11%
381%
147%
462%
48%
134%
Sequential Read 256KB
1717.9
1501.13
-13%
3297.57
92%
2450.9
43%
3687.54
115%
1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=60)
-7%
1886 ?(226 - 4512, n=199, last 2 years)
10%
Sequential Write 256KB
253.53
257.28
1%
3246.21
1180%
1523.87
501%
3908.34
1442%
748 ?(233 - 1332, n=60)
195%
1474 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=199, last 2 years)
481%
Random Read 4KB
218.41
156.16
-29%
438.5
101%
387.42
77%
441.21
102%
243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=60)
11%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=199, last 2 years)
27%
Random Write 4KB
261.55
258.92
-1%
652.8
150%
176.19
-33%
752.87
188%
244 ?(121.4 - 503, n=60)
-7%
312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=199, last 2 years)
19%

排放--Pixel 手机内部的双扬声器

温度

Pixel 9 Pro 在使用过程中会变得相当热。在负载情况下，我们测得的表面温度高达 42.8 °C。3DMark 压力测试显示，当智能手机处于压力状态时，其性能会在短时间内下降。根据测试场景的不同，输出功率只有三分之二可用。

Max. Load
 42.5 °C42.8 °C41.2 °C 
 41.9 °C42.3 °C39.3 °C 
 41.4 °C42 °C38.5 °C 
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 41.3 °C
40.1 °C42.4 °C42.3 °C
38.1 °C40.7 °C41 °C
36.5 °C39.5 °C40.2 °C
Maximum: 42.4 °C
Average: 40.1 °C
Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
92.5 % +37%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % +21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +17%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.3 % +16%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.6 %
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 % -13%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.5 % +18%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.4 % +17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +10%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 %
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 % 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60.9 % -12%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.6 %
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
65.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.1 % +14%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.3 % +3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.3 %
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
62.9 % -19%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (10.6-15.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.1 (20.9-25.6)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.8 (36.4-53.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.3 (71.1-86.7)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.2 (41.3-56.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø83.2 (72.3-89.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.3 (17.7-29.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.7 (17.5-29.4)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.37 (5.73-7.42)
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro

发言人

Pixel 9 Pro 的立体声扬声器可提供均衡的高音和中音，而低音则略显不足。尽管如此，作为一款紧凑型智能手机，Pixel 手机在低音方面的表现并不差。

外接音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 连接。Pixel 9 Pro 支持蓝牙编解码器 SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX、aptX HD、LC3 和 Opus。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.539.12532.236.53133.230.94031.129.75038.540.26326.133.98024.632.810019.536.612518.341.516016.354.520015.455.72501455.731515.158.240013.263.150011.568.863011.868.780013.472.9100015.276125013.375.316001371.1200012.771.5250013.971.8315014.277.140001481.2500014.685.4630013.781.4800013.680.81000013.578.51250013.476.51600012.666.8SPL25.990.6N0.781.3median 13.7median 71.8Delta18.536.239.330.733.825.638.926.736.336.738.324.63917.641.518.741.418.247.615.954.917.357.615.258.814.160.713.458.613.864.714.36513.770.112.475.812.777.212.177.312.980.512.581.512.28312.883.513.182.713.581.713.17913.778.51469.813.366.625.292.10.788.6median 13.5median 75.81.210.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 9 ProSamsung Galaxy S24+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 尽管电池容量较小，但比上一代产品续航时间更长

耗电量

在充电速度方面，Pixel 9 Pro 表现得很轻松。它的最大充电功率为 27 瓦，仍然略高于 Apple iPhone 16 Pro略高，后者仅支持 25 瓦。不过，两者的充电速度都无法与其他许多旗舰手机相提并论。

在我们的测试中，使用 65 瓦的 Ugreen CD275 电源装置，一个充电周期需要 1:38 小时。一小时后，智能手机的电量为 80%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.59 / 1.1 / 1.2 Watt
Load midlight 7.15 / 20.37 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh		Apple iPhone 16 Pro
3582 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		OnePlus 12
5400 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh		Xiaomi 14T Pro
5000 mAh		Average Google Tensor G4
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
14%
-6%
-21%
19%
-6%
-31%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
0.59
0.4
32%
0.63
-7%
1.3
-120%
0.43
27%
0.95
-61%
0.753 ?(0.48 - 1.28, n=4)
-28%
0.884 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years)
-50%
Idle Average *
1.1
0.6
45%
1.47
-34%
0.95
14%
0.84
24%
1.2
-9%
1.778 ?(1.1 - 2.99, n=4)
-62%
1.469 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
1
17%
1.55
-29%
1.12
7%
0.95
21%
1.27
-6%
2.04 ?(1.2 - 3.32, n=4)
-70%
1.624 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years)
-35%
Load Average *
7.15
11
-54%
8.45
-18%
10.55
-48%
6.76
5%
5.95
17%
7.28 ?(7.15 - 7.44, n=3)
-2%
6.6 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years)
8%
Load Maximum *
20.37
14.4
29%
8.63
58%
11.72
42%
16.42
19%
14.02
31%
18.8 ?(16.6 - 20.4, n=3)
8%
9.93 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years)
51%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.86 (0.843-16.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.13 (0.4228-13.5)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.59 (0.609-16.5)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.696 (0.648-0.885)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.615 (0.526-1.057)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.595 (0.552-1.054)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.42 (7.43-9.15)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.6 (11.2-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.2 (6.53-14.6)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.696 (0.648-0.885)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.615 (0.526-1.057)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.595 (0.552-1.054)

运行时间

就像 Pixel 9一样，Pixel 9 Pro 的电池续航时间同样令人印象深刻。事实上，它的 LTPO OLED 屏幕能让续航时间更长。在模拟网上冲浪测试中，我们的测试机持续了近 17 个小时，比标准机型多了半个小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 57min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
1017 min
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
3582 mAh
983 min
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
760 min
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
1237 min
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
1009 min
Xiaomi 14T Pro
5000 mAh
1123 min

Notebookcheck 总评分

明亮的显示屏、超长的电池续航时间、出色的摄像头、超长的更新时间--谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 在所有重要的方面都获得了加分，成为目前最好的紧凑型智能手机之一。不过，SoC 的性能不得不打点折扣，充电速度也不是特别快。

Google Pixel 9 Pro - 12/02/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
68 / 69 → 98%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
32 / 55 → 57%
Application Performance
63 / 85 → 74%
AI Performance
65%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 87%
Camera
83%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
86.8%
Materials
60%
Packaging
100%
Power Use
95%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 83.4%

More articles related to this device

Google Pixel 9 Pro (Pixel 9 Series)
News
•
对谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 的评价：多方面的改进
|
News
•
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 和类似产品获得旁路充电功能，以延长电池寿命
|
News
•
谷歌为 Pixel 9 Pro 等发布 12 月份功能预告
|
Review
•
最好的可折叠拍照智能手机？谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠机型评测
|
News
•
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠：iFixit 已提供备件，但显示屏价格与Apple iPhone 16 Pro 相当
|
Review
•
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro XL 评测--高端感更强的顶级智能手机，价格同样如此
|
News
•
Pixel 智能手机是否正在失去自己的特色？对谷歌 Pixel 9 的评价
|
Review
•
谷歌 Pixel 9 评测--谷歌小型智能手机走错了路
|
News
•
谷歌 Pixel 9a：泄露相机细节，暗示将降级以获得更薄的相机模块
|
News
•
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro、Pixel 8 等通过Android 15 和功能下降获得相机升级和新功能
|
News
•
谷歌 Pixel 9a：泄露显示外壳更大，有四种颜色
|
News
•
根据 DxOMark 评测，谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro Fold 的可折叠相机性能最佳，但显示屏不如Galaxy Z Fold6
|
News
•
Pixel 9 Pro 不兼容 Qi2：谷歌解释放弃磁性快速充电的原因
|
News
•
谷歌 Pixel 9、Pixel 9 Pro、Pro Fold、Buds Pro 2：上市和预购信息及无水印照片泄露
|
News
•
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 和 Pixel 9 Pro Fold 可付费接收卫星连接
|
News
•
谷歌发布 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠版预告视频，配备全新相机模块和人工智能功能
|
News
•
谷歌 Pixel 9、Pixel 9 Pro 和 Pixel 9 Pro 折叠版：提前泄露颜色名称并提供官方壁纸
|
News
•
谷歌 Pixel 9 和 Pixel 9 Pro：泄露者对摄像头和 Pixel 10 的评论
...

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 智能手机评测--配备出色摄像头的紧凑型旗舰手机
Manuel Masiero, 2024-12- 4 (Update: 2024-12- 4)