Notebookcheck Logo

小米 Poco F5 Pro 评测--配备高端 SoC 的强劲中端产品

最快的 Poco

小米的 Poco 系列是价格实惠、配置精良的智能手机的代名词，Poco F5 Pro 也不例外。这款 6.67 英寸的设备配备了高端骁龙 8+ Gen 1 SoC、WQHD+ 分辨率的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏和全时在线功能、三摄像头设置以及不到 1 小时的快速充电。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
小米 Poco F5 Pro

小米的子公司 Poco 以提供价格实惠、功能丰富的智能手机而声名远播。与小米的主要系列相比，Poco 选择了更简洁的设计，但在内部功能方面显然很少妥协。小米 Poco F5 Pro 也秉承了这一理念，它是 Poco F 系列的最新旗舰产品，其技术规格与红米 K60 相同，仅在中国正式发售。

6.67 英寸的小米 Poco F5 Pro 虽然竞争的是中端市场，但却拥有高端性能，搭载了 骁龙 8+ 第一代处理器的高端性能，确保了手机的长续航能力，而不会出现性能瓶颈。速度也是小米 F5 Pro 的重点。 Poco F5的性能与 骁龙 8 代 1与 骁龙 7+ 第一代.

小米 Poco F5 Pro 采用 3200 x 1440 像素 AMOLED 屏幕（WQHD+），刷新率为 120 Hz，峰值亮度超过 1000 尼特，具有额外的吸引力。它配备了三摄像头系统，包括一个带 OIS 的 6400 万像素镜头，以及 5160 毫安时的大容量电池，使用 67 瓦充电器可在不到一小时内充满电。

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Poco F5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 730
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, WQHD+, Gorilla Glass 5, Touch sampling rate up to 480 Hz, 1920 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 220.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Miracast, IR-Blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/28/38/40/41/66), 5G (Band 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.59 x 162.78 x 75.44
Battery
5160 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 30W Wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (Omnivision OV64B, f/1.79, 1.4µm pixel size) + 8MP ultrawide camera (f/2.2, 120° FOV) + 2MP macro camera (f/2.4); video resolution up to 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45; video resolution up to 1080p@60fps)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger (up to 20V/3.25A), USB Type-C Cable, SIM Eject Tool, Protective Case, Quick Start Guide, Warranty Card, Safety information, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, Dolby Atmos certification, Hi-Res-Audio certification, IP53 rating, Head SAR 0.998 W/kg, Body SAR 0.997 W/kg, fanless
Weight
204 g, Power Supply: 96 g
Price
629 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
87.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"3200x1440
86.8 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Xiaomi Poco F5
SD 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725		181 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87.1 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Google Pixel 7a
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		193.5 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Honor 90 5G
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644		183 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2664x1200
90.5 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
87.7 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Xiaomi 13T
Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6		197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220

小米在 Poco F5 Pro 的结构中采用了大量塑料。磨砂边框和后盖均由聚碳酸酯制成，与小米系列智能手机相比，触感明显改善。

后盖采用高光表面和碳纤维边缘，外观时尚，但容易沾染指纹，尤其是黑色版本。使用随机提供的保护壳可以缓解这一问题。

小米 Poco F5 Pro 显示屏平整，后盖沿长边呈圆形，做工精良，握持舒适，不过 204 克的重量让它略显沉重。相机模块从背面突出约 2 毫米，但其扁平的两侧有助于打造更时尚的外观和更好的手感。显示屏由大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护，出厂时还贴有保护膜。

除黑色测试样机外，小米 Poco F5 Pro 还有白色版本。它拥有 IP53 认证，性能优于同类产品Poco F5 ，可提供防尘和防水溅保护。

小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro

尺寸比较

❌
162.78 mm 75.44 mm 8.59 mm 204 g162.2 mm 75.7 mm 8.49 mm 197 g161.9 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 183 g161.11 mm 74.95 mm 7.9 mm 181 g152 mm 72.9 mm 9 mm 193.5 g146.3 mm 70.9 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 始终在线的显示屏和高达 512 GB 的存储空间

小米 Poco F5 Pro 有三种存储空间可供选择，价格公布在官方w网站截至 2023 年 12 月。无法使用 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。

  • 8GB + 256GB: ~$500
  • 12GB + 256GB: ~$540
  • 12GB + 512GB: ~$612

Poco F5 Pro 配备了 WiFi 6、蓝牙 5.3、NFC、Miracast、立体声扬声器，并支持 Dolby Atmos。顶部的红外线发射器可让智能手机充当电视等兼容设备的遥控器。值得注意的是，Poco F5 Pro 缺少 3.5 毫米音频插孔，只有在 Poco F5上才有。

Poco F5 Pro 的 USB-C 端口工作速度为 USB 2.0，但兼容 USB OTG，可连接外围设备（支持 exFAT 和 NTFS）。在使用华硕 ROG Strix Arion 机箱中的三星 980 Pro 进行的 USB 复制测试中，USB-C 端口的数据吞吐量达到了 31.6 MB/s，这是 USB 2.0 的典型值。

与 Poco F5 不同，小米 Poco F5 Pro 配备了 "真正的 "全时显示屏。同类产品的屏幕只能暂时开启，而 Poco F5 Pro 的 AMOLED 屏幕则可以根据需要永久开启。

左：无连接
左：无连接
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
头侧：扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风
头侧：扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风
功能区：读卡器、USB-C 2.0、Mikrofon、SIM-Fach
脚侧：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、SIM 卡隔层

软件 -Android 13 和不明确的更新供应

Poco F5 Pro 采用的是小米公司内部的用户界面 MIUI 14，该界面基于Android 13 构建。截至 2023 年 12 月的测试日期，该智能手机的Android 安全补丁日期为 2023 年 7 月 1 日，表明补丁已经过时。

小米没有提供有关 Poco F5 Pro 操作系统升级和安全更新持续时间的具体信息，该智能手机也没有被列入小米安全中心 。不过，可以推测该设备可能在 2 年内接受操作系统升级，在 3 年内接受安全更新。虽然这是一个合理的时间范围，但与竞争对手相比还是有差距。例如，三星提供了更长的支持期限；以Galaxy S23 为例，它可获得四次操作系统升级和额外一年的安全补丁。

小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 6E 和精确的全球定位系统

配备 WiFi 6E 的智能手机在中端手机中并不常见，但小米 Poco F5 Pro 却拥有这种先进的无线模块。因此，当与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配对时，它的传输速率高达 1738 MBit/s，令人印象深刻，尽管这些传输速率并不总是非常稳定。

虽然 Poco F5也支持 WiFi 6E，但其 WLAN 性能略逊于 Poco F5 Pro，这可能是 SoC 的差异造成的。

在移动覆盖方面，Poco F5 Pro 的覆盖范围与小米系列的同类产品相比略显有限。它拥有 15 个 4G 频段和 12 个 5G 频段，但可能不是全球旅行的最佳选择。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1573 (min: 1358) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1153 (min: 847) MBit/s ∼73%
Xiaomi Poco F5
iperf3 receive AXE11000
686 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
662 (min: 93) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1694 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1484 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼93%
Google Pixel 7a
iperf3 receive AXE11000
957 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
819 (min: 499) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
930 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
934 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼59%
Honor 90 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
910 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
939 (min: 470) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S23
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 13T
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
919 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼53%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1440 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1371 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼86%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1738 (1597-1857)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 725; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1694 (1558-1797)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1152 (847-1341)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 725; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (1288-1645)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1572 (1358-1639)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 725; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø685 (509-788)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1716 (1119-1807)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 725; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø676 (93-788)
楼内 GPS 接收
楼内 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收

Poco 智能手机使用 GPS (L1)、Glonass (L1)、Galileo (E1)、北斗 (B1) 和 QZSS (L1) 卫星导航系统，所有这些系统都在单频上运行。

在实际测试中，我们评估了 Poco F5 Pro 准确确定位置的能力。智能手机记录了约 10 公里的自行车骑行距离，并将结果与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表的结果进行了比较。尽管两款设备存在差异，但它们都表现出了类似的高精确度。这一表现预示着 Poco F5 Pro 可以胜任所有与导航相关的任务，因此我们对它竖起了大拇指。

GNS 测试：总结
GNS 测试：总结
GNS 测试：环湖
GNS 测试：环湖
GNS 测试：转折点
GNS 测试：转折点

电话功能和语音质量

Poco F5 Pro 有两个 nano SIM 卡插槽，可支持 5G、VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。在测试过程中，这款智能手机的语音质量非常出色。通过移动和固话网络通话时，通话者的声音清晰可辨，并能有效过滤干扰的背景噪音。

摄像头 - 6400 万像素三摄像头和 OIS

使用自拍相机拍摄
使用自拍相机拍摄

小米 Poco F5 Pro 采用隐藏式自拍摄像头，分辨率为 1600 万像素。它能够以最高每秒 30 帧的速度录制全高清视频。使用 1600 万像素摄像头拍摄的自拍照曝光均衡，图像清晰度和动态效果良好。

背面的三摄像头设置由 OmniVision OV64B 主导。该传感器负责通过 6400 万像素主摄像头（f/1.79）捕捉图像，利用 4 合 1 像素分选技术生成 1600 万像素照片（像素尺寸为 1.4 µm），并支持光学防抖功能。主摄像头还可处理变焦拍摄，实现高达 10 倍的数字放大。

在光线充足的条件下，主摄像头拍摄的图像清晰度高，色彩自然。不过，在弱光条件下，与旗舰相机相比，质量上的差距就很明显了，在测试中产生的图像非常暗和模糊。主摄像头支持最高每秒 24 帧的 8K 视频录制，而 4K 则可以最高 60 FPS 的速度录制。Poco F5 缺少 8K 录像选项。录制视频时，用户可以通过调整变焦系数在主摄像头和超广角摄像头之间切换。

800 万像素超广角摄像头提供 120° 的视场角，图像质量稳定。总体而言，照片显示的细节较少，边缘往往模糊失真。相机组合中的第三个镜头是一个 200 万像素的微距摄像头，但在实际使用中，与通常出现在高价智能手机上的长焦摄像头相比，它的作用较小。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Ultraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme
orginal image
click to load images

最后，在受控照明条件下，我们分析了主摄像头再现 ColorChecker 色彩图参考色的准确程度。主摄像头的最大 Delta-E 值为 19.23，与理想值有明显偏差，尤其是在较暗的绿色和蓝色色调上。

在最佳照明条件下，测试图的再现非常清晰，只有边缘有轻微变亮，即使是一些高端相机也会出现这种效果。在弱光条件下（1 勒克斯的残余光），主相机的弱点就显现出来了，因为测试图几乎什么都看不到。

ColorChecker
16.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: 10.83 ∆E min: 3 - max: 19.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.8 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
65 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: 47.03 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 92.94 ∆E

附件和保修 - 含 67 瓦电源装置

67 瓦供电装置
67 瓦供电装置

配送范围包括一个 67 瓦的电源适配器、一条 USB-C 数据线（A 型至 C 型）、一个 SIM 卡针、一个透明保护套、一份快速入门指南以及两份包含保修和安全信息的额外宣传单。

小米为 Poco F5 Pro 在美国提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 120 赫兹和高触摸采样率

Poco F5 Pro 的 AMOLED 面板具有 480 Hz 的触摸灵敏度，可确保对输入的快速响应。再加上高达 120 Hz 的刷新率，使操作非常流畅。振动电机可提供精确的反馈。

Poco F5 Pro 的指纹传感器位于显示屏下方，具有很高的识别率。此外，该设备还通过自拍摄像头进行二维人脸扫描，提供生物识别认证。这种方法虽然可靠，但安全性较低，需要足够的环境光或显示屏亮度才能正常工作。

键盘横向模式
键盘横向模式
键盘纵向模式
键盘纵向模式

显示屏 - 采用 WQHD+ 的明亮 AMOLED 面板

子像素
子像素

Poco F5 Pro 的 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板超出预期，使其成为少数支持双分辨率的中端智能手机之一。与Poco F5 相似，它标配全高清（2400 x 1080 像素）显示内容。为了获得更清晰的画面，用户可以通过 Poco F5 Pro 的附加显示设置选项，将 Full HD 转换为分辨率为 3200 x 1440 像素的 WQHD+。

在默认设置下，屏幕会根据内容在 60 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节。用户也可以将刷新率固定在 60 或 120 Hz。除了支持 HDR10 和 HDR10+，该显示屏还支持 HLG 和杜比视界。

小米宣称 Poco F5 Pro 的 AMOLED 面板最大亮度为 1400 尼特。在亮暗图像区域均匀分布的测量中（APL18），该显示屏达到了值得称赞的 1224 cd/m²，尽管与制造商的规格略有出入。在显示 HDR 内容时，AMOLED 面板在测试中达到了 1180 cd/m²。

AMOLED 面板采用脉宽调制 (PWM) 技术控制屏幕亮度，因此屏幕闪烁不可避免。不过，振幅曲线保持恒定的 120 Hz，尽管最初看起来较低，但在整个亮度范围内都是一致的，有助于实现整体的护眼体验。此外，小米还采用了 1920 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光，提高了敏感用户的舒适度。

999
cd/m²		1002
cd/m²		1031
cd/m²
991
cd/m²		1002
cd/m²		1025
cd/m²
984
cd/m²		992
cd/m²		1013
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1031 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1004.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1002 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Xiaomi Poco F5
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Google Pixel 7a
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"		Honor 90 5G
AMOLED, 2664x1200, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S23
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.1"		Xiaomi 13T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-58%
-15%
-57%
-100%
10%
Brightness middle
1002
1034
3%
1006
0%
1180
18%
1125
12%
1254
25%
Brightness
1004
1033
3%
1010
1%
1202
20%
1122
12%
1250
25%
Brightness Distribution
95
93
-2%
95
0%
88
-7%
96
1%
93
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
1.9
-138%
1.1
-38%
1.5
-88%
3.2
-300%
0.8
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.7
3.7
-118%
2.5
-47%
4.8
-182%
4.9
-188%
1.6
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
2.7
-93%
1.5
-7%
2.8
-100%
3.3
-136%
1.3
7%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
2.25 98%
2.25 98%
1.97 112%
2.21 100%
CCT
6468 100%
6917 94%
6531 100%
6489 100%
6504 100%
6350 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120.3 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

Poco F5 Pro 为用户提供了三种色彩配置文件--鲜艳、饱和和原色，可根据用户的喜好调整显示设置。此外，还提供了色温、色彩空间和色彩饱和度的高级调节选项。

使用分光光度计和 Calman 分析软件进行的测量显示，小米在出厂时对显示屏进行了精心校准。AMOLED 面板在原色配置文件中显示出最佳的色彩再现，始终提供近乎理想的图像参数值，包括色温、伽玛和 RGB 平衡。

色彩保真度（色彩方案原色、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案原色、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案原色、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案原色、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案原色、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案原色、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案原色、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案原色、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.569 ms rise
↘ 0.559 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.527 ms rise
↘ 0.5615 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在户外，Poco F5 Pro 的 AMOLED 面板具有出色的可读性，即使在阳光直射下也能有效显示内容。可选的阳光模式可提高显示屏对明亮环境光的适应能力。环境光线传感器能迅速响应光线条件的变化。

室外使用（自动亮度）
室外使用（自动亮度）
室外使用（最大亮度）
室外使用（最大亮度）

显示屏具有出色的视角稳定性，即使在平视角度下亮度也几乎保持不变。AMOLED 面板可能会出现一些典型的色彩偏移，但不会对可读性产生负面影响。

视角
视角

性能 - 配备骁龙 8+ 第一代处理器的 Poco F5 Pro

配备 骁龙 8+ 1 代小米 Poco F5 Pro 采用的是 2022 年的高端 SoC，目前可提供充足的动力，傲视群雄。虽然骁龙 8+ Gen 1 的性能可能不会在 2024 年创造新的记录，但它能确保日常使用中系统的无缝流畅，并为下一代应用程序和游戏提供足够的性能储备。

在与同价位中端智能手机的比较中，Poco F5 Pro 始终名列前茅。在合成基准测试中，小米智能手机落后于 三星Galaxy S23采用了 骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy.值得注意的例外包括 PCMark 以及人工智能基准 UL Procyon AI 和 AImark。

相比之下 Poco F5采用了 骁龙 7+ 2 代在日常使用中与 Poco F5 Pro 的整体性能差异不大。值得注意的是，Poco F5 Pro 在人工智能基准测试中的表现优于同类产品，而 Poco F5 在这一领域的熟练程度相对较低。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1549 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=25)
1281 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1266 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1225 Points -3%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1036 Points -18%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1018 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points -21%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
826 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4974 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=25)
4167 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3965 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
3948 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3833 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -16%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
3094 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3093 Points -22%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1984 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1741 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1530 - 1854, n=7)
1735 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1687 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=162, last 2 years)
1454 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1428 Points -18%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1252 Points -28%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
1119 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5149 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (4140 - 4761, n=7)
4493 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
4378 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4346 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=162, last 2 years)
4049 Points -7%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
4034 Points -7%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3383 Points -22%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
3261 Points -25%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1134684 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1115567 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1100815 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=23)
997431 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
903102 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points -27%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
657414 Points -40%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
593635 Points -46%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15774 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15270 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 20841, n=24)
15090 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
14143 Points -10%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
13966 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -18%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
12265 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
11736 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1041 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=23)
1033 Points -1%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
934 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points -15%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
872 Points -16%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
817 Points -22%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
704 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8830 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=23)
7450 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7296 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points -14%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
5971 Points -18%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5751 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
5089 Points -30%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
4296 Points -41%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14401 Points +24%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11727 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=23)
11726 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11651 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points -13%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
8634 Points -26%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
7803 Points -33%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
7446 Points -36%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8871 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=23)
7492 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6863 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points -1%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6298 Points -8%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5126 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
4374 Points -36%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
3640 Points -47%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
26748 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16194 - 26660, n=23)
21146 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20731 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
15847 Points -24%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
15766 Points -24%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11101 Points -46%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
8150 Points -61%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1779 Points +4%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1734 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1709 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=23)
1699 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points -8%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1550 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1384 Points -19%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
1330 Points -22%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
74958 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=21)
43831 Points -42%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
43053 Points -43%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
26303 Points -65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points -78%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16702 Points -78%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
10511 Points -86%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
7374 Points -90%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
124195 Points
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
46207 Points -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (887 - 147801, n=11)
37778 Points -70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points -79%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
22237 Points -82%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1320 Points -99%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1189 Points -99%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
805 Points -99%

配备 Adreno 730图形处理器，Poco F5 Pro 可提供强劲的图形性能。令人印象深刻的是，它在要求苛刻的 GFXBench 4K Aztec Ruins 基准测试中达到了 22 fps，表明即使是高分辨率游戏也能流畅运行。相比之下 Poco F5配备的 Adreno 725 GPU 的表现则不尽如人意，尤其是在 GFXBench 极具挑战性的 3D 测试中。尽管如此，两款智能手机在 3DMark 中的速度几乎相同。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points +78%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2079 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1968 Points -5%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1832 Points -12%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1690 Points -19%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points -59%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points +82%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2121 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1984 Points -6%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1860 Points -12%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1725 Points -19%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13911 Points +68%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8294 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7701 Points -7%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6855 Points -17%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6439 Points -22%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3137 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8097 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7684 Points -5%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6557 Points -19%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6480 Points -20%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3146 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6185 Points +42%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6043 Points +38%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4985 Points +14%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4501 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4370 Points
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4267 Points -2%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21767 Points +37%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15933 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14801 Points -7%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10121 Points -36%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10067 Points -37%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7388 Points -54%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13955 Points +39%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10274 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10033 Points
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8769 Points -13%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7756 Points -23%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6466 Points -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -26%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
429 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
359 fps -16%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
262 fps -39%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
248 fps -42%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
158 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -2%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -14%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -26%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps +51%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
232 fps +30%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
157 fps -12%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -25%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -3%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps -41%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -53%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -54%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
164 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
137 fps -16%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps -39%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -41%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +31%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -18%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -35%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -54%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -61%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +28%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -18%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -33%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -47%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +56%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -22%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -30%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -52%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +31%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -29%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -44%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -50%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +19%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -20%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -50%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -54%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
126 fps
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -50%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -56%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -61%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -72%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +36%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -27%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps -41%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps -50%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -64%

这款智能手机在快速网站加载、快速页面渲染和无缝滚动方面表现出色。在浏览器基准测试中一直处于领先地位，值得注意的是，这种性能优势可能部分归因于该设备运行的浏览器版本更先进。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
160.616 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
158.595 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
126.392 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)
125.2 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points -25%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
104.662 Points -35%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
96.176 Points -40%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
64.3 Points -60%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
167 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -18%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
136 runs/min -19%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
125 runs/min -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18)
119.6 runs/min -28%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
112 runs/min -33%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
108 runs/min -35%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
61.8 runs/min -63%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
159 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
146 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=21)
113.9 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
111 Points -30%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
107 Points -33%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
107 Points -33%
Honor 90 5G (Chrome 115)
58 Points -64%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
224 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)
159.4 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points -34%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
134 Points -40%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
123 Points -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
59913 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
55611 Points
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
44948 Points -19%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
42222 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)
42193 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
37823 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -33%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
21143 Points -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
2686.1 ms * -269%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -115%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
1232.9 ms * -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)
1023 ms * -40%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
1021.2 ms * -40%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
919.6 ms * -26%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
728.6 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
701.7 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

与许多中端智能手机一样，Poco F5 Pro 拥有 UFS 3.1 内存。这一选择确保了小米设备的快速充电时间和快速数据传输。

Xiaomi Poco F5 ProXiaomi Poco F5Google Pixel 7aHonor 90 5GSamsung Galaxy S23Xiaomi 13TAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
11%
-30%
-21%
-20%
8%
-18%
-15%
Sequential Read 256KB
1876.8
1798.37
-4%
1624.39
-13%
1831.4
-2%
3133.7 ?(UFS 4.0)
67%

1686.71 ?(UFS 3.1)
-10%

1861.15
-1%
1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101)
-7%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
-2%
Sequential Write 256KB
1773.94
1736.41
-2%
996.44
-44%
1444.1
-19%
844 ?(UFS 4.0)
-52%

628.53 ?(UFS 3.1)
-65%

1766.12
0%
1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101)
-34%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
342.04
389.37
14%
229.44
-33%
226.5
-34%
427.61 ?(UFS 4.0)
25%

343.65 ?(UFS 3.1)
0%

380.76
11%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101)
-16%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
372.35
498.93
34%
263.81
-29%
260
-30%
156.69 ?(UFS 4.0)
-58%

130.26 ?(UFS 3.1)
-65%

452.08
21%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102)
-14%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
-17%

游戏 - 即使在高分辨率下，游戏也能流畅运行

虽然 Poco F5 Pro 并非专门作为游戏智能手机设计，但它搭载了 骁龙 8+ 第一代和 Adreno 730图形芯片，即使在高图形设置下，也能以每秒 60 帧的速度毫不费力地流畅运行当前游戏。值得注意的是，我们的测试游戏《PUBG Mobile》和《Genshin Impact》没有达到 AMOLED 显示屏提供的每秒 120 帧的最高帧数。

我们使用Gamebench测试工具来评估游戏帧率。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.3.0_19705728_19706476: Ø59.8 (51-61)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.3.0_19705728_19706476: Ø59.7 (53-61)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.9.0: Ø59.6 (56-61)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.9.0: Ø40 (39-41)

排放物 - 立体声扬声器和众多蓝牙编解码器

温度

在重负载情况下，小米 Poco F5 Pro 的最高温度达到 43.3 °C，触感明显温热。值得注意的是，这个温度是在极端情况下测得的，因为用于此目的的烧机基准测试运行了一个小时，故意提高智能手机的温度。在通常的日常使用中，温度会低于在这种极端条件下测定的平均值。

骁龙 骁龙 8+ 1 代Poco F5 Pro 中的骁龙 8+ Gen 1 表现出延迟节流，使其能够长时间保持峰值性能。例如，在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中，20 次运行中只有 17 次出现节流。之后，Poco F5 Pro 的初始性能降低了约 30%。

Max. Load
 42.7 °C42.6 °C39.9 °C 
 42.8 °C43.3 °C41.6 °C 
 42.5 °C42.4 °C41.5 °C 
Maximum: 43.3 °C
Average: 42.1 °C
34.8 °C40.4 °C40.8 °C
38.6 °C40.5 °C42 °C
36 °C40.4 °C40.7 °C
Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +43%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91.4 % +31%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85.8 % +23%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.6 % -1%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.3 % -22%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 %
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90.2 % -10%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.6 % -39%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 % -46%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.7 (12.7-12.7)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø11.7 (11.7-11.8)
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø8.32 (6.73-11.1)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)
Xiaomi 13T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.63 (9.32-10.3)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47.3 (34.2-49.1)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.9 (39.1-45.6)
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.2 (21.4-39.5)
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.8 (18.8-18.9)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)
Xiaomi 13T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.9 (35.4-38.7)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.7 (39.7-46.1)
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.9 (18.7-18.9)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)
小米 Poco F5 Pro
小米 Poco F5 Pro

发言人

Poco F5 Pro 的音频体验通过位于智能手机短边的两个立体声扬声器来实现。这些扬声器的音量相对较高，达到 89.4 dB(A)，并以线性响应提供中高音。不过，低音在混音中并不明显。

对于外接音频设备，这款智能手机通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙 5.3 提供连接选项。Poco F5 Pro 支持多种蓝牙编解码器，包括 AAC、SBC、LDAC、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive Audio、aptX TWS+ Audio 和 LHDC V1 至 V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.638.72524.729.2312422.84024.6255032.129.3632224.78016.425.31002628.312519.83316015.644.220014.643.425011.151.83158.259.840011.558.25009.965.66308.467.680010.273.410001175.3125013.473.7160012.173.620001276250012.378.2315012.479.740001383.8500013.179.8630013.874.5800013.771.2100001468.81250013.769.11600012.861SPL24.789.4N0.674.1median 12.8median 71.2Delta1.58.53741.327.630.828.932.321.332.928.538.823.134.320.433.42135.516.839.117.745.116.248.51755.914.459.214.958.713.965.614.768.514.775.114.978.814.579.414.278.414.675.814.477.315.680.214.283.317.282.11576.514.272.814.669.317.669.317.966.327.290.60.981.3median 14.9median 72.81.510.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco F5 ProXiaomi Poco F5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco F5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 不到一小时即可充满电

耗电量

Poco F5 Pro 的 "Pro "标识使其有别于其他手机。 Poco F5特别是在电池容量方面。后者的电池容量为 5000 毫安时，而 Poco F5 Pro 的电池容量则稍大一些，为 5160 毫安时。此外，与 Poco F5 不同的是，Pro 版支持容量高达 30 瓦的无线充电。

在测试过程中，使用附带的 67 瓦电源适配器，该设备从空电池充满电需要 56 分钟。虽然这个时间比小米所说的 48 分钟略长，但仍然代表了相当快的充电速度。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 1.04 / 1.08 Watt
Load midlight 11.27 / 13.84 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
5160 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F5
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 7a
4385 mAh		Honor 90 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh		Xiaomi 13T
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
2%
24%
-20%
42%
-12%
-16%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
0.89
4%
0.62
33%
1.19
-28%
0.57
39%
1.13
-22%
1.006 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=21)
-8%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Average *
1.04
1.05
-1%
0.87
16%
1.71
-64%
0.74
29%
1.37
-32%
1.834 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=21)
-76%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-40%
Idle Maximum *
1.08
1.08
-0%
0.95
12%
1.82
-69%
0.83
23%
1.42
-31%
1.984 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=21)
-84%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-50%
Load Average *
11.27
10.86
4%
6.11
46%
6.8
40%
4.26
62%
8.98
20%
5.68 ?(2.75 - 15, n=21)
50%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
43%
Load Maximum *
13.84
13.49
3%
11.81
15%
10.93
21%
6.16
55%
13.23
4%
8.44 ?(4.54 - 15, n=21)
39%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
29%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.12 (1.04-11)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.57 (0.819-10.1)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.19 (0.819-14)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.838 (0.784-1.217)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.824 (0.707-0.916)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.82 (6.45-7.63)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.27 (5.86-6.72)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (10.5-13)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.838 (0.784-1.217)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.824 (0.707-0.916)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

电池寿命

我们在屏幕亮度设置为 150 cd/m²、刷新率保持默认设置的情况下进行了实际电池续航时间测试。

在无线局域网测试中，Poco F5 Pro 表现出了值得称赞的续航能力，足足持续了 16 个小时。在连续播放高清视频时，智能手机在 18 小时 26 分钟后需要充电。同类设备的电池续航时间相似。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 10min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 54min
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
5160 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F5
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 7a
4385 mAh		Honor 90 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh		Xiaomi 13T
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-13%
-18%
12%
5%
Reader / Idle
1690
1324
-22%
1328
-21%
1239
-27%
2249
33%
2511
49%
H.264
1106
1123
2%
1224
11%
990
-10%
1255
13%
1040
-6%
WiFi v1.3
960
1014
6%
821
-14%
901
-6%
926
-4%
1026
7%
Load
354
343
-3%
252
-29%
247
-30%
370
5%
247
-30%

Pros

+ 高性能
+ 明亮的 AMOLED 面板
+ 120 Hz 和 WQHD+
+ 全时在线显示
+ 丰富的功能
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 无更新保修
- 塑料盒
- 适中的额外相机

小米 Poco F5 Pro 的评价

小米 Poco F5 Pro 评测。测试设备由
小米 Poco F5 Pro 评测。测试设备由

小米发布了迄今为止速度最快的 Poco 智能手机 Poco F5 Pro。这款 6.67 英寸的小工具搭载了 骁龙 8+ 第一代性能明显优于其他中端智能手机。它拥有 WiFi 6E、日光下强大的主摄像头、67 瓦快速充电和超长电池续航等卓越功能。

与同类产品相比，Poco F5 的性能优势在于 Poco F5(骁龙 7+ 第二代) 相比，性能优势可能并不明显，但 Poco F5 Pro 在附加功能方面却非常突出。它的 120 Hz AMOLED 面板支持全功能的始终保持在线功能，触摸灵敏度为原来的两倍（480 Hz 对 240 Hz），分辨率为 3200 x 1440 像素的 WQHD+，使其与 Poco F5 不同。此外，Poco F5 Pro 专门提供 IP53 认证，并支持 30 瓦的无线充电。

小米 Poco F5 将强大的功能和高性能与相对实惠的价格结合在一起。

尽管 Poco F5 Pro 有志于在高端市场竞争，但它在某些方面还是暴露了自己的中端身份。值得注意的是，它的塑料后壳和边框虽然做工精良，但却凸显了它的中端身份。三摄像头系统也需要改进，软件更新的不确定性也是一个缺点。此外，值得注意的是，3.5 毫米耳机插孔只出现在 Poco F5 上。

对于那些考虑小米 Poco F5 Pro 替代品的人来说，可以选择更经济实惠的 Poco F5、 谷歌 Pixel 7a和 三星Galaxy S23脱颖而出。尤其是后两者，它们提供了长达 5 年的更新期，在这方面超过了 Poco F5 Pro。

价格和供应情况

小米 Poco F5 Pro 在亚马逊的起售价不到 500 美元。

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro - 01/04/2024 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 78%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
94%
Games Performance
68 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
91 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
66%
Average
82%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Poco F5 Pro 评测--配备高端 SoC 的强劲中端产品
Manuel Masiero, 2024-01- 6 (Update: 2024-08-15)