Notebookcheck Logo

谷歌Pixel 7a评测--近乎完美的中端智能手机

伟大的大小型手机。

随着Pixel 7a的发布，谷歌对其中端系列进行了更新和改进--不仅是在处理器的选择上，而且还有全新的功能。此外，由于其出色的电池寿命和长时间的更新供应，这款Android 智能手机肯定会给人留下深刻印象。
5G Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)

谷歌Pixel 7a是去年Pixel 6a的直接继任者。 Pixel 6a.不出所料，这家互联网巨头的中端智能手机继承了它的两个老兄弟姐妹的SoC--一个真正的高端芯片组。除此以外，谷歌还做了很多改进：这款手机的OLED屏幕现在有更高的刷新率，这将导致更平滑的画面，无线充电功能--USB端口也被改造了。这一切意味着这款手机并没有远远落后于Pixel 7现在。

Pixel 7a有一个存储版本，配备8GB内存和128GB内部存储，其MRSP为499美元。这使得它比前代产品整整贵了50美元。

Google Pixel 7a (Pixel 7 Series)
Processor
Google Tensor G2 8 x 1.8 - 2.9 GHz, Cortex X1 / A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.10 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 431 PPI, Capacitive, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Screen to body ratio: 81 %, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12 ,14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 152 x 72.9
Battery
4385 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (1/1.73", f/1.89, 26 mm, 0.8 µm, 80°, DPAF, OIS) + 13 MPix (f/2.2, 1.12 µm, 120°); Camera2-API: Full
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, 20 mm, 1.12 µm, Fixfocus)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, OTG-Adapter, USB-Cabel, SIM-Tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP67, DRM Widvine L1, Body-SAR: 1.30 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.99 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (L1), BeiDou (L1), fanless, waterproof
Weight
193.5 g
Price
510 Euro
Links
Google homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
87.1 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Google Pixel 7a
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		193.5 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2340x1080
89.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Apple iPhone 14
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core		172 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
86.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Xiaomi 13 Lite
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644		171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
86.8 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Motorola Edge 40
Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9		171 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080

谷歌Pixel 7a的设计借鉴了其前代产品，即Pixel 6a- 但它现在有海（浅蓝色）、炭（黑色）、雪（白色）和珊瑚色。后者是我们测试设备的颜色。它的显示屏与表面积之比为81%，还算不错--不过，它的边框肯定比两款更昂贵的机型要厚。即便如此，Pixel 7a还是一款相对紧凑的智能手机。

谷歌智能手机的背面现在是由3D热成型塑料制成的，看起来和感觉都与玻璃相似。只有当你仔细比较时，你才会发现这种材料更沉闷一些。正面由康宁大猩猩3号玻璃保护，外壳中使用的铝是100%回收的。

这款手机的构造很好。如果你试图扭动它，它只会发出一点吱吱声，而且设备上没有明显的缝隙。只有外壳的背面在相机模块的顶部和框架之间有一个稍大的缝隙。SIM卡槽与边框几乎无缝连接，盖子的颜色与外壳的其他部分只有细微差别。

Pixel 7a的电池被牢牢地集成在外壳中，无法自行调换。这款智能手机通过了IP67认证--这意味着它可以防尘，并能防止偶尔浸泡在淡水中。

(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)

尺寸比较

❌
159.2 mm 72.7 mm 7.23 mm 171 g158.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 202 g158.43 mm 71.99 mm 7.49 mm 171 g152.2 mm 71.8 mm 8.9 mm 178 g152 mm 72.9 mm 9 mm 193.5 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.8 mm 172 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性--谷歌的智能手机有一个瘦身的USB接口

规格表显示，谷歌Pixel 7a有一个USB 3.2 Gen.2连接，这意味着它应该支持高达10GBit/s的传输速率。然而，在我们的复制测试中，我们只测得228.27MB/s，与较慢的USB 3.2（Gen.1）端口处于同一水平。相比之下：ROG Phone 7的ROG Phone 7管理的速率几乎达到860 MB/s。虽然支持OTG，但手机既不支持NTFS也不支持exFAT的外部存储媒体。使用这个USB端口，有线图像输出也同样困难。

除此以外，Pixel 7a仍然只具备最基本的功能，包括蓝牙5.3和NFC。

顶部：麦克风（照片：Daniel Schmidt）。
顶部：麦克风
左边：SIM（照片：Daniel Schmidt）。
左边：SIM卡
右：功率、体积（照片：Daniel Schmidt）。
右：电源、音量
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风（照片：Daniel Schmidt）。
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风

软件--Android 手机的长期更新供应

谷歌Pixel 7a安装了Android 13，并且只使用谷歌自己的应用程序。许多功能将已经从 Pixel 7.安全补丁将按月推出，总共五年。此外，Pixel 7a将收到三个大的系统更新，这意味着它仍将看到Android 16。

通信和GNSS - Pixel 7a已经掌握了6-GHz WLAN

谷歌Pixel 7a支持广泛的移动频段以及所有常用标准，包括5G Sub6。在较大的城市，其接收效果应该不错。

由于支持Wi-Fi 6E，这款手机可以利用2.4、5.0和6.0 GHz的WLAN连接。特别是它支持相对年轻的6GHz网络，这在这个价格范围内的许多手机中是找不到的--通常，只有高端智能手机才能做到这一点。然而，Pixel 7 和Pixel 7 Pro 仍然比7a有优势，因为它们在这个频率区域的运行速度几乎是7a的两倍。

Networking
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
957 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
819 (min: 499) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
930 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
934 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
843 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
750 (min: 546) MBit/s ∼43%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
746 (min: 642) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
894 (min: 834) MBit/s ∼51%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1440 (min: 1312) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1757 (min: 1611) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
839 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
942 (min: 912) MBit/s ∼54%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 449) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼54%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
719 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
736 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (471-958)
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø932 (915-946)
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (475-963)
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, ARM Mali-G78 MP20; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (449-907)
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø819 (499-922)
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, ARM Mali-G78 MP20; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø931 (459-973)
GPS测试：支持的GNSS
全球导航卫星系统
GPS测试：在室内
在室内
GPS测试：室外
外界

Pixel 7a可能只支持单频GNSS，但它支持所有著名的卫星网络：GPS、Glonass、Galileo、BeiDou和QZSS。卫星定位在建筑物内的速度甚至相当快，尽管有技术限制，但谷歌手机在建筑物外仍能保持良好的信号。

在一次自行车旅行中，我们将Pixel 7a与Garmin Venu 2进行了比较。令人惊讶的是，在追踪我们的行程时，智能手机显示出一些弱点，而且经常有点偏离方向。在一天结束时，这应该仍然被证明足以满足日常导航的需要。

GNSS测试路线：环湖之旅
GNSS测试路线：环湖之旅
GNSS测试路线：转折点
GNSS测试路线：转折点
GNSS测试路线：摘要
GNSS测试路线：摘要

通话功能和通话质量

谷歌Pixel 7a支持VoLTE和WLAN通话等基本功能--此外，它还支持一项名为 "清晰通话 "的功能，据称即使在嘈杂的环境中也能可靠地过滤掉背景噪音。

事实上，Pixel 7a在实践中确实提供了良好的通话质量，它能够过滤掉相当多的背景噪音--即使在繁忙的街道上。这款手机的扬声器模式确实听起来不错，但它的麦克风没有最广泛的覆盖范围。

这款智能手机有一个Nano SIM卡的空间，你还可以另外（或替代）设置一个eSIM卡。

相机--Pixel 7a的主摄像头性能稳定

在Pixel 7a上自拍（人像模式）。
在Pixel 7a上自拍（人像模式）。

Pixel 7a的前置摄像头已升级为1300万像素--然而，由于光圈为f/2.2，它在名义上的感光度低于像素6a.你可以使用这个镜头以60 FPS的速度录制全高清视频，或以30 FPS的速度录制超高清视频。由于相机的均匀照明，自拍看起来很好，人像模式提供了漂亮的虚化水平，可以清楚地识别主体和背景。

6400万像素的主摄像头--具有光学图像稳定功能（OIS）--也能拍出好照片。不幸的是，它们的颜色色调与Pixel 7 Pro ，略有不同，但在低光照条件下，差异仍然小得令人惊讶。这款手机只具有数字变焦功能，能够放大8倍，但不幸的是，质量从2倍变焦的标志开始恶化。它的超广角镜头也有一点不足之处：图像的边缘往往有点模糊，扭曲和颗粒变得相当明显。

使用主摄像头，可以用高达60FPS的超高清录制视频，在实践中，它们看起来相当不错。虽然，你只能在30和60FPS之间选择，24FPS甚至不是一个选项。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light
orginal image
click to load images

在受控的照明条件下，7a有相当自然的色彩描绘--其DeltaE值都没有达到10。

我们的测试图被描绘得很好--只有角落有点模糊。唯一令人失望的是，谷歌甚至没有为用户提供64MPix模式--相反，每张照片都使用了像素分选技术，以实现16.1MPix的总量。可选的RAW数据也是如此。

ColorChecker
8.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 7a: 5.15 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 9.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
25 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
40 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
21 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 7a: 26.78 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 40.05 ∆E

附件和保修 - 缩小的交货范围

缩小的交付范围（照片：Daniel Schmidt）。
瘦身后的交付范围

在美国，购买Pixel 7a的人可以享受一年的标准保修，不能延长。它的交货范围仍然是相当小的。这只包括一条USB-C电缆、一个OTG适配器以及一个SIM卡工具。

7a的可选配件包括一系列不同颜色的塑料外壳，一个皮套，一个透明外壳，一个配套的30瓦电源和Pixel Stand 2。

输入设备和操作 - Pixel 7a具有良好的振动电机

谷歌Pixel 7a拥有漂亮光滑的俘虏式触摸屏，由康宁大猩猩3号玻璃保护。

生物识别安全由位于屏幕内的光学指纹传感器负责，该传感器工作可靠，可立即解锁手机。现在，你也可以通过手机的摄像头切换到使用面部识别，然而，这个选项的安全性要差一些。

该设备还掌握了众所周知的功能，如现在播放、单手模式和有限的永远在线显示屏，它可以为你提供时间和日期以及天气信息。指纹传感器的定位也可以用AoD来突出，但这要消耗更多的能量。

它的线性振动马达（Z轴）可以提供坚实而精确的反馈。

显示屏 - 谷歌手机有一个明亮的90Hz OLED屏幕

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Pixel 7a的显示屏尺寸为6.1英寸，分辨率为2,400 x 1,080像素。最后，谷歌为他们的中端设备提供了更高的刷新率：90赫兹。虽然，这首先必须在设备的设置中激活（平滑显示）。该手机还支持HLG、HDR10和HDR10+的HDR标准。

在屏幕亮度方面，7a甚至成功地超过了像素7(947 cd/m²)--通过激活环境光传感器，这款手机在描绘纯白色屏幕时，平均达到了1,010 cd/m²。在光线和黑暗区域均匀分布的情况下（APL18），这款手机实现了高达1383 cd/m²的数值。如果你愿意手动设置亮度，那么你可以获得486 cd/m²。

Pixel 7a的OLED闪烁相当明显--在最低亮度水平下，手机在不安分的177和364赫兹之间波动，这意味着对光敏感的用户在使用这款手机时很可能有一些问题。

998
cd/m²		1010
cd/m²		1027
cd/m²
1006
cd/m²		1006
cd/m²		1026
cd/m²
985
cd/m²		997
cd/m²		1032
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1032 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1009.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.09 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1006 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Google Pixel 7a
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"		Apple iPhone 14
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"		Xiaomi 13 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Motorola Edge 40
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Google Pixel 6a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Screen
-34%
-19%
-12%
-34%
-7%
Brightness middle
1006
940
-7%
835
-17%
905
-10%
1023
2%
758
-25%
Brightness
1010
935
-7%
841
-17%
904
-10%
1042
3%
767
-24%
Brightness Distribution
95
99
4%
97
2%
99
4%
90
-5%
93
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
2.4
-118%
1.05
5%
1
9%
1.6
-45%
0.9
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
3.2
-28%
2.81
-12%
3
-20%
4.3
-72%
2.5
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
2.2
-47%
2.6
-73%
2.2
-47%
2.8
-87%
1.6
-7%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.05 107%
2.034 108%
2.23 99%
2.27 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
6531 100%
6422 101%
6616 98%
6382 102%
6457 101%
6599 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 218 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 218 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 218 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25％的显示亮度
25 %
50 %的显示亮度
50 %
75％的显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

手机的色彩描述和白平衡使用 "自然 "设置进行了最佳调整，并且没有显示出批评的理由--颜色没有显示出明显的异常值。使用 "自适应 "模式，白平衡仍然相似，但颜色更饱和一些。

灰度（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7965 ms rise
↘ 0.781 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.325 ms rise
↘ 1.778 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外，Pixel 7a提供了良好的可读性--即使在阳光下。只是其光亮的表面偶尔会让人觉得有点烦。

环境光传感器的工作非常可靠，可以快速调整亮度。

(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)

OLED面板的视角稳定性非常好--正如预期。在非常平坦的视角下，反射变得最令人讨厌。然后，内容被描绘得稍微冷一些，亮度也略有下降。

谷歌Pixel 7a的视角稳定性
谷歌Pixel 7a的视角稳定性

性能 - Pixel 7a有一个Tensor G2

Pixel 7a使用谷歌2022年的顶级SoC，即Tensor G2。Tensor G2，并拥有8GB LPDDR5内存。

这款手机的性能与其他使用这种SoC的Pixel智能手机相似。然而，在高负载情况下，Pixel 7a与它的大哥哥们相比有一点差距--大概是由于SoC的冷却效率较低。

由于该设备的90-Hz显示屏，系统速度很好，很流畅。

Geekbench 4.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)
5555 Points +16%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
4800 Points +1%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (4771 - 4800, n=4)
4784 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
4771 Points
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3906 Points -18%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
3656 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
3550 Points -26%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)
15472 Points +28%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
12869 Points +6%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (12110 - 12946, n=4)
12684 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
12596 Points +4%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
12110 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11682 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
11130 Points -8%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1732 Points +67%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (1036 - 1078, n=4)
1053 Points +2%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1050 Points +1%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1036 Points
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1025 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
835 Points -19%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
791 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
783 Points -24%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4733 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3310 Points +7%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3265 Points +6%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (3093 - 3265, n=4)
3198 Points +3%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3093 Points
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
2940 Points -5%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2894 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2817 Points -9%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=165, last 2 years)
1478 Points +4%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (1428 - 1480, n=4)
1452 Points +2%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1428 Points
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1120 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=165, last 2 years)
4126 Points +22%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (3383 - 3967, n=4)
3638 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3617 Points +7%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3383 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
829792 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)
810387 Points +23%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
773655 Points +18%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
715338 Points +9%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (619727 - 773857, n=5)
692109 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
687619 Points +5%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
657414 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
581838 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
507481 Points -23%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
16611 Points +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13024 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11890 Points +1%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
11736 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (10530 - 11736, n=5)
11184 Points -5%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
10530 Points -10%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9717 Points -17%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1180 Points +26%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
934 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (886 - 934, n=5)
900 Points -4%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
898 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)
894 Points -4%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
865 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
703 Points -25%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
662 Points -29%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
620 Points -34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points +11%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
6247 Points +9%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (5704 - 6419, n=5)
6057 Points +5%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5950 Points +3%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5751 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4666 Points -19%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4539 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4153 Points -28%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points +31%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
9601 Points +23%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9109 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
8961 Points +15%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
8797 Points +13%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (7803 - 9601, n=5)
8791 Points +13%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
7803 Points
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
6136 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points +33%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
6592 Points +29%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (4556 - 6548, n=5)
5416 Points +6%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5392 Points +5%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5126 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4857 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4404 Points -14%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4385 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points +10%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (15766 - 16375, n=5)
16151 Points +2%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
16001 Points +1%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
15766 Points
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
14148 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8229 Points -48%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7612 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
7108 Points -55%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
Web
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1838 Points +6%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (1720 - 1838, n=5)
1750 Points +1%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1734 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1533 Points -12%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1476 Points -15%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1445 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1337 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
43053 Points
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
42556 Points -1%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (37656 - 44323, n=5)
42050 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
29413 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21840 Points -49%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
21639 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)
17392 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5835 Points -86%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
44527 Points +5431%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
25706 Points +3093%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
11860 Points +1373%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1002 Points +24%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (496 - 1008, n=5)
840 Points +4%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
805 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
622 Points -23%

芯片ARM Mali-G710 MP7提供了良好的图形加速，并使其中端竞争对手望尘莫及。只有iPhone 14和 iPhone SE's A15-GPU更快一些。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2776 Points +52%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1832 Points
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1800 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1228 Points -33%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
829 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points -56%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
3005 Points +62%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2040 Points +10%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1860 Points
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1841 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1262 Points -32%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
838 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
813 Points -56%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
11779 Points +72%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7261 Points +6%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6855 Points
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6660 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4405 Points -36%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3035 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points -58%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5415 Points +27%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4277 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4267 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4227 Points -1%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points -4%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3325 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11491 Points +14%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10121 Points
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8957 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8601 Points -15%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6767 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5129 Points -49%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8192 Points +6%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7756 Points
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7606 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7205 Points -7%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5501 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps +54%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
113 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +4%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps 0%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
446.6 fps +80%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
252 fps +2%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
249 fps 0%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
248 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
202 fps -19%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
147 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
119 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps 0%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
76 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps -23%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps -33%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
253 fps +89%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps +13%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps -1%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps -40%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps +57%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps +7%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps +5%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -16%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
172.4 fps +78%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +3%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -8%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -46%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -54%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +15%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps +11%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps 0%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -26%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -52%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
105.2 fps +64%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +6%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -19%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -33%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
57.6 fps +31%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +9%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -25%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
38.2 fps +41%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +22%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +4%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -22%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +18%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -10%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -16%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
111.1 fps +98%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +27%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +4%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -11%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -39%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
16.8 fps +29%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +8%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +8%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.2 fps -29%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -55%

事实证明，使用预装的Chrome浏览器浏览网页的速度非常快。在我们的基准测试中，Pixel 7a的表现也超过了所有Android 的对手。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
189.85 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points +16%
Average Google Tensor G2 (96.3 - 117.8, n=5)
104.7 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
104.662 Points
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
96.314 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
94.611 Points -10%
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)
75.261 Points -28%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
74.161 Points -29%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
67.258 Points -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
341 runs/min +173%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min +12%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
125 runs/min
Average Google Tensor G2 (100 - 134, n=5)
118 runs/min -6%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
100 runs/min -20%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
90.4 runs/min -28%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
70.5 runs/min -44%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
69.9 runs/min -44%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
67.2 runs/min -46%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
188 Points +69%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)
114.5 Points +3%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
111 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (90 - 111, n=5)
98.6 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
97 Points -13%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
93 Points -16%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
79 Points -29%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
78 Points -30%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
72 Points -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
65726 Points +46%
Average Google Tensor G2 (43817 - 47939, n=5)
45221 Points +1%
Google Pixel 7
45158 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
44948 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
33801 Points -25%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
33046 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
28282 Points -37%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
27804 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
1738.9 ms * -89%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * -69%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
1531.6 ms * -67%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
1384.1 ms * -51%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
1208.8 ms * -31%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
1021.8 ms * -11%
Average Google Tensor G2 (920 - 1075, n=5)
992 ms * -8%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
919.6 ms *
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
496.4 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

Pixel 7a采用了快速的UFS 3.1存储，这比Pixel 7a中的存储要快得多。像素7.在我们比较的设备中，只有摩托罗拉Edge 40提供了更好的速度。

你无法使用微型SD卡扩展手机的存储空间。

Google Pixel 7aSamsung Galaxy A54 5GXiaomi 13 LiteMotorola Edge 40Google Pixel 6aGoogle Pixel 7Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-51%
-4%
16%
-16%
-11%
-7%
25%
Sequential Read 256KB
1624.39
528.32
-67%
1001.82
-38%
1876.88
16%
1312.64
-19%
1280.81
-21%
1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=60)
-1%
1867 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years)
15%
Sequential Write 256KB
996.44
335.39
-66%
871.96
-12%
1587.93
59%
712.94
-28%
879.39
-12%
748 ?(233 - 1332, n=60)
-25%
1451 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years)
46%
Random Read 4KB
229.44
236.23
3%
277.33
21%
235.66
3%
219.53
-4%
210.47
-8%
243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=60)
6%
279 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years)
22%
Random Write 4KB
263.81
70.52
-73%
301.41
14%
229.44
-13%
225.61
-14%
253.92
-4%
244 ?(121.4 - 503, n=60)
-8%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years)
18%

游戏--尽管是顶级的SoC，但不是最流畅的

在这个阶段，我们很遗憾无法展示我们通常所做的FPS记录，因为每次我们试图这样做时，Pixel 7a都会大幅升温并崩溃。

即便如此，我们还是想尝试描述一下我们的印象。休闲游戏对谷歌智能手机来说没有问题，而更复杂的游戏，如《PUBG》或《源氏冲击》则不那么容易运行。虽然射击游戏《PUBG》在最高的图形设置（超高清）下只是有点生硬，但手机在《源氏冲击》上的挣扎要大得多。我们建议将帧率限制在30FPS，因为如果不这样做，游戏在战斗中会开始滞后。

除此之外，Pixel 7a在横向模式下运行游戏方面做得很好--但有时，你的手会遮住环境光传感器，屏幕突然变得很暗。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
玄信影响
玄信影响

排放--冷却效果弱，仍然很热

温度

在闲置模式下，谷歌Pixel 7a的表面温度仍然不明显，但在负载下，它们开始上升了不少。虽然，必须指出的是，我们已经开始改用密集型的Burnout基准测试来模拟高负荷，这意味着这些数值只能部分地进行比较。但是，仍然可以在日常使用中达到这些温度。这是很温暖的，但没有什么太出格的地方。

在3DMark压力测试中，有一件事变得很明显，我们在基准测试中已经开始看到：Pixel 7a的SoC存在散热不良的问题，这意味着其长期性能比更昂贵的机型差很多。

Max. Load
 45.2 °C43.2 °C41 °C 
 45.7 °C48.3 °C42.7 °C 
 48.3 °C47.6 °C41.3 °C 
Maximum: 48.3 °C
Average: 44.8 °C
38 °C42.5 °C42.8 °C
39.5 °C42.5 °C46.7 °C
39.2 °C41 °C41.7 °C
Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 41.5 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +83%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +83%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +82%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
84.1 % +55%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.3 %
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42.9 % -21%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +64%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +64%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % +64%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
75.5 % +25%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.6 %
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49.2 % -19%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø8.32 (6.73-11.1)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.65 (8.06-11.1)
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14 (13.2-17.5)
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.2 (21.4-39.5)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (25.8-39.3)
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.9 (48.4-57.6)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø34.4 (28.6-40.2)

发言人

谷歌Pixel 7a上的两个扬声器听起来相当体面。当然，低音和精确的高音有所欠缺，但我们观察到的性能对于智能手机来说是不错的。

有线耳机可以通过USB-C端口连接。蓝牙5.3是无线的，在音频编解码器支持方面有一些积极的惊喜。除了常见的编解码器SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC，还支持LC3和Opus。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.940.62526.235.23129.431.84028.736.85036.637.4632231.68019.730.610017.933.712518.541.816017.756.920015.156.125015.559.131516.559.84001358.650013.468.263014.271.38001376.6100012.881.3125013.877.6160013.773.9200013.677250013.278.131501479400013.582.8500013.682.1630013.976.4800013.672.21000013.676.31250013.873.41600013.164.4SPL25.890.4N0.784.7median 13.7median 73.9Delta0.8929.638.63029.724.525.225.826.737.537.925.228.120.222.920.43017.543.114.453.914.351.415.256.311.957.913.560.612.163.512.459.711.765.311.87211.475.912.376.312.276.312.178.312.27712.98013.479.813.277.712.977.913.675.213.466.113.264.924.888.70.673.3median 12.9median 720.99.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 7aSamsung Galaxy A54 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 7a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 非常好，但不太符合预期

消耗功率

谷歌Pixel 7a的功耗在激活90赫兹时已经很低了。只是在负载下变得更高--可能是由于更耗电的Burnout基准测试。

Pixel 7a支持高达18瓦的快速充电，尽管 "快速 "是相对的，因为在我们的测试中，谷歌智能手机需要两个多小时才能充满电。20分钟后达到25%的标准，49分钟后达到50%的标准，84分钟后达到80%的标准，94分钟后达到90%的标准。

一个新特点是，Pixel 7a现在还支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.07 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.62 / 0.87 / 0.95 Watt
Load midlight 6.11 / 11.81 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 7a
4385 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 14
3279 mAh		Xiaomi 13 Lite
4500 mAh		Motorola Edge 40
4400 mAh		Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh		Average Google Tensor G2
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
8%
-17%
-24%
-23%
-57%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.75
-21%
0.6
3%
0.74
-19%
0.62
-0%
0.68
-10%
0.896 ?(0.62 - 1.33, n=5)
-45%
0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
-43%
Idle Average *
0.87
1.51
-74%
0.8
8%
1.56
-79%
1.78
-105%
1.56
-79%
1.984 ?(0.87 - 4.67, n=5)
-128%
1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
-67%
Idle Maximum *
0.95
1.62
-71%
1
-5%
1.59
-67%
1.85
-95%
1.58
-66%
2.07 ?(0.95 - 4.78, n=5)
-118%
1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
-69%
Load Average *
6.11
4.91
20%
5.4
12%
3.33
45%
3.02
51%
5.37
12%
6.32 ?(3.27 - 9.81, n=5)
-3%
6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years)
-7%
Load Maximum *
11.81
8.93
24%
9.2
22%
7.59
36%
8.23
30%
8.74
26%
10.8 ?(5.5 - 19.8, n=5)
9%
9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years)
16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.07 (0.808-11.5)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.7 (1.081-12.5)
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.751 (0.709-0.953)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.6 (6.07-11.2)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.32 (4.08-4.55)
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.751 (0.709-0.953)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)

运行时间

这款手机的电池容量为4385毫安时，比Pixel 6a的电池容量略小，但在我们调整了显示亮度（150cd/m²）的实际WLAN测试中，其运行时间更好。不幸的是，在其他测试中，情况就不一样了。谷歌肯定会在某个时候对此进行改进，因为我们的功耗测量表明，还有很多未使用的潜力。

然而，Pixel 7a在目前的状态下已经取得了非常好的成绩。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 08min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 114)
13h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 12min
Google Pixel 7a
4385 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 14
3279 mAh		Xiaomi 13 Lite
4500 mAh		Motorola Edge 40
4400 mAh		Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Battery Runtime
37%
36%
23%
27%
22%
Reader / Idle
1328
2591
95%
2689
102%
2240
69%
2272
71%
1878
41%
H.264
1224
1508
23%
1266
3%
1185
-3%
1235
1%
1318
8%
WiFi v1.3
821
941
15%
1010
23%
822
0%
924
13%
768
-6%
Load
252
284
13%
289
15%
321
27%
304
21%
360
43%

Pros

+ 明亮的90-Hz OLED屏幕
+ IP67认证
+ 6-GHz WLAN和USB 3.2
+ 无线充电
+ 良好的主摄像头
+ 长时间的更新供应

Cons

- 既非直流也非PWM调光
- 快速充电速度慢
- 有限的USB端口
- 负载下严重节流

判决 - 内部竞争

谷歌Pixel 7a评测（图片: Daniel Schmidt）
谷歌Pixel 7a评测

Pixel 7a的竞争对手有很多地方需要改进，因为这款谷歌智能手机已经做得很好。它采用了明亮的OLED屏幕，色彩还原准确--而且终于有了90Hz的刷新率。这款手机的主摄像头能拍出很好的照片，它的电池运行时间也很好--尽管它们确实有一点进一步改进的余地。其功能由IP67认证、无线充电和长时间的更新供应完成。

谷歌Pixel 7a是一款强大的中端智能手机，在更高的价格范围内，它的朋友和敌人都在竞争。

但即使是Pixel 7a也不能完全逃避批评：在其规格表上，谷歌将手机的USB端口命名为3.2 Gen.2，然而，它缺少一个有线图像输出选项，其传输速率更多是在较慢的USB 3.2（Gen.1）连接范围内。此外，它的OLED闪烁相当明显，而且该手机没有利用任何调光技术来缓解这种情况。如果你期待Pixel 7a的快速SoC，你确实必须考虑到由于手机的冷却性能较弱而带来的轻微限制。它的定位性能也留有改进的余地。

在发布会上，像素7被证明是一个很好的选择--小米13 Lite小米13 Lite和Galaxy A54都有一些Pixel 7a所缺乏的优势。

价格和可用性

谷歌Pixel 7a可以直接从谷歌商店购买。购买，价格为499美元。使用他们的以旧换新选项要小心，因为他们为旧设备提供的价格有时非常低。我们建议先在网上比较一下价格。

另外，该设备可以在亚马逊上找到，价格为489.33美元。

Google Pixel 7a - 06/16/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
58 / 70 → 83%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
94%
Games Performance
55 / 64 → 86%
Application Performance
82 / 86 → 96%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
77%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 谷歌Pixel 7a评测--近乎完美的中端智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-06-19 (Update: 2024-08-15)