Notebookcheck Logo

小米Poco X4 GT智能手机评测--实惠的高性能手机,144Hz显示屏

每天都是冠军。

小米的Poco阵容充满了具有良好规格的廉价智能手机。小米Poco X4 GT就是这样一款手机,它的官方售价为380欧元(约370美元),提供了高端处理器、快速144赫兹显示屏和大电池的令人兴奋的组合。这对日常使用来说是否绰绰有余?我们在评论中对该手机进行了测试。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
小米Poco X4 GT

小米提供不同价格范围的智能手机。小米系列包括昂贵的高端手机,而更实惠的机型则在红米品牌下提供。然后还有Poco阵容,与红米手机相比,它更注重以预算价格提供出色的规格。小米Poco X4 GT正是这样一个例子。

在其核心部分,6.6英寸的Poco X4 GT由八核联发科Dimensity 8100处理器驱动,配以8GB内存,并具有快速的144Hz IPS面板。在引擎盖下,你还会发现高达256GB的存储空间,分辨率高达64MP的三摄像头设置,支持最新的无线标准(如Wi-Fi 6)和67瓦适配器的快速充电。继续阅读,看看Poco X4 GT是否有能力在性价比方面超越竞争对手。

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT (Poco X5 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 8 x 2 - 2.9 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.60 inch 20.5:9, 2460 x 1080 pixel 407 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Gorilla Glass 5, FHD , 270 Hz touch sampling rate, HDR10, Dolby Vision, DC dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 98.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, proximity, gyroscope, compass, colour spectrum sensor, electronic compass, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41), 5G (Band 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/77/78), Head SAR 0.596 W/kg, Body SAR 0.996 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.6 x 74.3
Battery
5080 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Triple: 64MP Main (f/1.89, 1.6µm, 4-in-1 Pixel Binning) 8MP Ultra Wide (f/2.2, FOV 120°) 2MP Macro (f/2.4, 1,75µm), videos up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.45, videos up to 1080p@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger, USB cable, SIM eject tool, protective case, quick start guide, warranty information, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
200 g, Power Supply: 102 g
Price
360 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
85.6 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6
200 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2460x1080
85.8 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Google Pixel 6a
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
178 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
86.4 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
155 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
83.4 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86.4 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco F4
SD 870, Adreno 650
195 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳 - 亚光塑料机身

小米提供蓝色、银色和黑色的Poco X4 GT。在我们使用这款手机的过程中,事实证明,磨砂后盖对指纹有相当的抵抗力。一旦你将设备滑入附带的透明保护壳,它就会停止在平面上来回摇晃。如果没有保护壳,这几乎是不可避免的,因为摄像头凸起部分从机身上突出了约3毫米(0.12英寸)。

Poco X4 GT的重量并不轻,只有200克(0.44磅)。虽然后部和边框是由塑料制成的,但由于其出色的配合和加工以及紧密的缝隙,这款手机仍然感觉很好很结实。只有后盖的中间部分在不需要太多力量的情况下会轻微弯曲。然而,这并不影响手机的整体感觉。这款小米手机没有经过IP认证。但USB-C端口可以使用集成在保护壳中的盖子进行密封,以防止灰尘和污垢进入手机机身。

Poco X4 GT的正面由大猩猩5号玻璃保护。穿孔式自拍相机位于IPS显示屏的顶部。而指纹传感器被内置在电源按钮中。和音量摇杆一样,电源键牢牢地固定在机身上,几乎没有左右摇摆,按起来也令人满意。

小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 74.3 mm 8.9 mm 200 g163.2 mm 75.95 mm 7.7 mm 195 g159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g159.1 mm 73.3 mm 8.3 mm 189 g159.4 mm 74.2 mm 6.8 mm 155 g152.2 mm 71.8 mm 8.9 mm 178 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 - 8GB的内存和高达256GB的存储空间

Poco X4 GT有两种存储选项。配备8GB LPDDR5内存和128GB UFS 3.1存储空间的型号正式定价为380欧元(约370美元),而8/256GB型号将让你花费430欧元(约420美元)。

潜在的买家应该知道,这款手机没有microSD插槽,没有通知LED,也没有永远在线的显示屏。但它确实有一个3.5毫米音频插孔,一个红外线发射器和一对具有杜比全景声认证的立体声扬声器。除了NFC和蓝牙5.3,Poco X4 GT还配备了一个USB-C端口,支持OTG,以USB 2.0速度运行。

在左边:没有端口
在左边:没有端口
右边:带指纹传感器的电源键,音量摇杆
右边:带指纹传感器的电源键,音量摇杆
在顶部。红外发射器,麦克风,3.5毫米音频插孔
在顶部。红外发射器,麦克风,3.5毫米音频插孔
底部:双卡槽、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部:双卡槽、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

软件 -Android 12和MIUI 13

Poco X4正在运行Android 12,上面是小米自己的MIUI 13用户界面。在我们的审查过程中,该智能手机在9月底收到了一个更新(MIUI 13.0.8.0),使该设备达到了2022年9月1日的最新安全补丁水平。

开箱后,在我们的评测单元上,128GB的容量中大约有98GB是可用的。预装的第三方应用程序,如亚马逊、Facebook、Solitaire、Spotify和WPS Office,如果你想释放一些存储空间,都可以删除。由于Poco X4 GT支持Widevine L1 DRM,它能够以高清质量播放视频。

小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT
小米Poco X4 GT

连接性和GNSS - 快速Wi-Fi 6和精确导航

Poco X4拥有坚实的移动连接,支持4G和5G网络中各12个频段。这种兼容性水平太低,无法在全球范围内使用这款手机,但至少它支持欧盟地区的所有相关频率。

小米手机能够使用Wi-Fi 6,使其达到的传输速度不仅对中档手机来说是优秀的。当连接到我们的参考路由器(华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000)时,Poco X4 GT设法达到高达956 Mbit/s的速度,使其几乎与 谷歌Pixel 6a.小米 小米Poco F4紧随其后,但在接收率方面的表现稍差。然而,Poco X4 GT并非没有缺陷:其数据接收率不如其数据传输率稳定。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
897 (449min - 907max) MBit/s +8%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
830 (639min - 890max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=188, last 2 years)
719 MBit/s -13%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
677 (331min - 713max) MBit/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
960 (480min - 997max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
956 (484min - 979max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (459min - 973max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=190, last 2 years)
736 MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s -72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)
1444 MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (876min - 953max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)
1377 MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (884min - 949max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT MediaTek Dimensity 8100, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (639-890)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (328-351)
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT MediaTek Dimensity 8100, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (484-979)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø269 (255-281)
建筑物内的GPS接收
建筑物内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

对于位置跟踪,Poco X4 GT使用卫星导航服务GPS(L1)、伽利略(E1)、格洛纳斯(L1)、QZSS(L1)和北斗(B1)。在我们的测试中,当我们在建筑物内时,单频GNSS需要一些时间来定位我们,但产生了相对准确的结果,精确度为2米(6.56英尺)。在室外,Satfix的速度要快得多,甚至精确到1米(3.28英尺)。

在我们的实际测试中,Poco X4 GT为我们提供了准确的位置信息,证明了它适合用于导航目的。在大约10公里的自行车骑行中,除了一些小的偏差外,这款手机能够绘制出几乎与Garmin Venu2健身智能手表(带来进行比较)一样准确的路线。

GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:环湖旅行
GPS测试:环湖旅行
GPS测试:转折点
GPS测试:转折点

电话和语音质量

在通话过程中,小米手机提供了良好的语音质量。即使在免提模式下,线路两端的声音听起来也很清晰。然而,这款手机并不总是能够可靠地过滤掉周围的嘈杂声。

小米Poco X4可以容纳两张纳米SIM卡,并支持通过LTE语音和通过Wi-Fi语音。

摄像头 - 三摄像头设置,最高可达64MP

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片

通常情况下,摄影不是小米Poco智能手机的首要任务,但Poco X4 GT的64MP三摄像头设置实际上做得很好。1600万像素的自拍相机也是如此,它拍出的人像看起来还不错,但有些冲淡了。

手机上的64MP主摄像头使用相同的三星GW1传感器,例如,也在 realme GT Neo 2.这种传感器使用一种称为分片的技术将四个相邻的像素组合成一个更大的像素。

在良好的照明条件下,用主摄像头拍摄的照片色彩清晰,细节层次分明,非常突出。然而,在不太理想的光线下或场景中较暗的区域拍摄的照片,对比度和清晰度明显较低。800万像素的超宽摄像头也使用三星传感器(三星S5K47H)。同样,在光线良好的情况下,它也能拍出扎实的照片,但照片最终会有明显的柔和边缘。

由于手机缺乏长焦镜头,它只能拍出平庸的变焦照片,由于积极的图像锐化,看起来很不自然。主镜头无法应付我们的低光设置,只能拍出一个非常模糊的Notebookcheck吉祥物的图像。这就是说,你仍然能够使用夜间模式从黑暗的场景中获得一些可用的东西。微距模式,可以在相机设置中启用,做得很好。但你可以使用变焦功能获得至少同样好的微距照片。

主摄像头能够录制高达4K和30FPS的视频,并提供良好的图像质量。然而,电子图像稳定功能只能工作到1080p,这意味着你将需要一个非常稳定的手来捕捉可用的4K视频。此外,录制视频时,你不能在主摄像头和超宽摄像头之间切换。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用超宽相机拍摄的照片
用超宽相机拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultrawide shot5X zoomLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images

在测试实验室里,在最佳的照明条件下,主拍摄者能够相当准确地再现ColorChecker卡上的颜色。测试图的照片也变成了令人印象深刻的平衡。在照片的边缘,锐度有明显的下降。然而,这个缺点不是Poco X4 GT特有的,因为许多其他智能手机的摄像头也有这个问题。

ColorChecker
9.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: 7.19 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 17.28 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
48.2 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
58.3 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
58.4 ∆E
59.1 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
64 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: 41.64 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 66.17 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括67瓦的充电器

在盒子里,你会发现一个67瓦的充电器,一条USB线(C型到A型),一个SIM卡弹出工具,一个透明的保护壳,一份快速入门指南,以及与Poco X4 GT一起的保修卡。小米商城还出售各种配件,如电源箱或耳机,以配合手机使用。

小米为Poco X4 GT提供24个月的保修。此外,零售商的保修也适用。

输入设备和操作 - 自适应刷新率高达144 Hz

Poco X4的IPS显示屏能非常迅速和准确地记录输入。多亏了迅捷的 联发科Dimensity 8100和8GB的LPDDR5内存,即使同时打开许多应用程序,该系统也能保持快速运转。

当选择 "标准 "刷新率设置时,Poco X4 GT将动态地将其屏幕刷新率调整为30至144赫兹的数值。小米称这一功能为 "7级动态切换显示",指的是七个可用的刷新率。30、48、50、60、90、120和144赫兹。

屏幕刷新率会根据屏幕上的内容自动改变。例如,在播放视频时,IPS面板可以将其频率降低到30赫兹,然后在游戏或滚动时将其刷新率提高到高达144赫兹。当刷新率为90赫兹或更低时,显示屏的触摸采样率可以上升到270赫兹,这在游戏时也特别有用。

对于生物识别认证,该手机支持指纹和二维面部识别。指纹传感器内置在电源按钮中。它能快速检测指纹,没有任何值得注意的问题。

横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 带有HDR10和Dolby Vision的IPS面板

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

Poco X4 GT采用了2,460 x 1,080的IPS面板,具有令人印象深刻的高像素密度(407 PPI)和最大刷新率(高达144 Hz)。在显示设置中,你也可以手动将刷新率设置为90赫兹或60赫兹。该显示器还支持HDR10和Dolby Vision。然而,其峰值亮度略微过低,无法提供最佳的HDR体验。

小米手机的IPS面板的平均峰值亮度为613.6cd/m²,这使它处于良好的位置。除了小米Poco F4有一个更亮的屏幕外,我们比较的所有设备都有类似的峰值亮度水平。

当亮度测量被限制在一个较小的屏幕区域(APL18)时,该面板设法达到了621cd/m²的亮度。在禁用环境光传感器的情况下,显示亮度可以达到525 cd/m²。在最低亮度设置下,我们测得的屏幕亮度为1.71 cd/m²。

我们在Poco X4 GT的IPS面板上检测到闪烁现象。然而,在超过50,000赫兹的情况下,PWM频率非常高,甚至敏感的用户也不应该受到闪烁的影响。时间性抖动的情况也类似。当使用显微镜和慢动作视频拍摄(240帧)检查IPS面板时,我们没有注意到任何时间性抖动效果。

604
cd/m²
631
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 631 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 613.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.71 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 629 cd/m²
Contrast: 1573:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
IPS, 2460x1080, 6.6"
Google Pixel 6a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Motorola Edge 30
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Poco F4
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
21%
-5%
-48%
-3%
-12%
Brightness middle
629
758
21%
632
0%
594
-6%
718
14%
917
46%
Brightness
614
767
25%
630
3%
594
-3%
730
19%
923
50%
Brightness Distribution
94
93
-1%
92
-2%
99
5%
92
-2%
96
2%
Black Level *
0.4
Contrast
1573
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
0.9
25%
1.46
-22%
2.74
-128%
1.62
-35%
2
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.2
2.5
22%
3.32
-4%
6
-88%
4.21
-32%
5.2
-63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.6
36%
2.6
-4%
4.2
-68%
2
20%
3.5
-40%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.2 100%
2.209 100%
2.278 97%
2.156 102%
2.23 99%
CCT
6374 102%
6599 98%
6755 96%
7322 89%
6545 99%
6447 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 51540 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 51540 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 51540 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在显示设置中,你可以在 "鲜艳"(默认启用)、"饱和 "和 "原色 "等色彩方案中进行选择。由于其设计,IPS面板没有一个完美的黑色水平,但其对比度还是非常可观的,为1,573:1。选择 "原色 "模式时,图像质量也是如此:颜色值和灰色阴影都在理想范围内(Delta E < 3),而且在所有亮度水平上,RGB平衡都很好。

色彩准确度("原色 "方案,以sRGB为参考)。
色彩准确度("原色 "方案,以sRGB为参考)。
色彩空间("原色 "方案,以sRGB为参考)。
色彩空间("原色 "方案,以sRGB为参考)。
灰度("原色 "方案,以sRGB为参考)。
灰度("原色 "方案,以sRGB为参考)。
色彩饱和度("原色 "方案,以sRGB为参考)。
色彩饱和度("原色 "方案,以sRGB为参考)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.568 ms rise
↘ 8.479 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.29 ms rise
↘ 14.63 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于屏幕的峰值亮度并不高,你可能应该避免在阳光直射下使用该显示器。否则,你可能无法看清屏幕上的内容。然而,在阴暗的地方,这款手机可以在户外使用,没有问题。由于视角宽广,即使从尖锐的角度看,屏幕上的内容也容易阅读。

户外使用(在阴天)。
户外使用(在阴天)。
户外使用(在阴天)。
户外使用(在阴天)。

性能 - 联发科8100的中端性能

Poco X4 GT采用了高端的 联发科Dimensity 8100SoC。虽然这个基于ARM的八核处理器不属于最好的智能手机CPU,但它的性能仍处于中上水平。

在合成基准测试中,小米提供的性能水平与 谷歌Pixel 6a的性能,后者配备了 Tensor SoC.唯一的例外是,在单核基准测试中,联发科SoC的速度明显慢于谷歌CPU。小米 小米Poco F4(骁龙870 5G)略微落后于这两款手机。AnTuTu v9给了Poco X4 GT一个可敬的总分,超过了80万分。另一方面,这款手机在AIMark中完全没有很好地处理与人工智能相关的计算,但这也是我们比较中的大多数其他设备的情况。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1025 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1012 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
963 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (887 - 971, n=3)
922 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
887 Points
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
826 Points -7%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points -17%
Multi-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (3701 - 4012, n=3)
3811 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3701 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3370 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3007 Points -19%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
2940 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2872 Points -22%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points -49%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)
810387 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
809368 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (778486 - 819433, n=3)
802429 Points -1%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
715338 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
662980 Points -18%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
553328 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points -49%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
15194 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (12684 - 14650, n=3)
13463 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
13056 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=192, last 2 years)
13052 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12866 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points -12%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9717 Points -26%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points -35%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)
894 Points +5%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
865 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
850 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (764 - 850, n=3)
801 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
734 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
732 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6157 Points
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5950 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (5393 - 6157, n=3)
5855 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
5616 Points -9%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4932 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points -41%
System
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11897 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (10066 - 11897, n=3)
11220 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10940 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points -14%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points -19%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9109 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
8962 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points -40%
Memory
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points +14%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
6592 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6506 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6016 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (4662 - 6356, n=3)
5678 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4762 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points -36%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points +50%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
14148 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12630 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11595 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (10106 - 11595, n=3)
10874 Points -6%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points -33%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7516 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points -55%
Web
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1732 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (1651 - 1742, n=3)
1708 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1511 Points -13%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1476 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1315 Points -24%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points -30%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
27192 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (25609 - 27192, n=3)
26391 Points -3%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21710 Points -20%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
21639 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20239 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
18000 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)
17392 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4239 Points -84%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
114168 Points +1693%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points +1016%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (6367 - 6893, n=2)
6630 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6367 Points
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5967 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5777 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4714 Points -26%

Poco X4 GT配备了一个 ARM Mali-G610 MP6集成GPU。的 谷歌Pixel 6a是它在3D基准测试中最强硬的竞争对手。谷歌手机在3DMark Wild Life中取得了最好的成绩,而小米手机由于其144赫兹的显示屏,几乎在整个GFXBench中达到了最高的屏幕帧率。同样,在GFXBench屏幕外测试中,它也是对比组中表现最好的产品之一。Poco X4 GT对于一些屏幕上的测试(如3DMark Sling Shot Extreme OpenGL ES 3.1)来说太快了,所以我们不打算在这里展示任何结果。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1366 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1256 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1218 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
768 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2040 Points +52%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1339 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1283 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1207 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
764 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7261 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5632 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4273 Points -24%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4214 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2831 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6695 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5862 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4262 Points -27%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4208 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2814 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5017 Points
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4547 Points -9%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4277 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4211 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points -38%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10287 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9929 Points
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8957 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6240 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8155 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7789 Points -4%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7205 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5763 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points -54%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps -32%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -49%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
272 fps
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
252 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps -33%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
178 fps -35%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
148 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps -66%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -24%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -46%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -46%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
124 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -28%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps -54%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -25%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -34%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps -61%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -19%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -19%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps -60%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -12%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -58%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -11%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -21%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -19%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -22%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -14%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -17%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -26%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -13%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -15%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -62%

在浏览器基准测试中,Poco X4 GT没有出汗。浏览器摩托罗拉Edge 30, 谷歌Pixel 6a, 小米Poco F4和小米Poco X4 GT总是在各种浏览器基准测试中占据前四位。在日常使用中,X4 GT提供了非常好的网络浏览性能。网站加载迅速,导航快速而流畅。即使同时打开许多标签,也没有卡顿或滞后现象。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points +48%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)
96.94 Points +18%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
90.283 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT (Mi Browser 13.14.1-gn)
82.477 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (80.5 - 82.5, n=3)
81.4 Points -1%
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)
75.261 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points -23%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.1 Points -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min +76%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
90.4 runs/min +14%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT (79.Chrome 105.0.5195.136)
79.28 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (64.5 - 79.3, n=3)
72.1 runs/min -9%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
66.48 runs/min -16%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)
54.4 runs/min -31%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min -35%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min -37%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)
114.5 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT (Chrome 105.0.5195.136)
94 Points
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
93 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (79 - 94, n=2)
86.5 Points -8%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
72 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Chrome 103)
46 Points -51%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +40%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
116 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (101 - 113, n=3)
106.7 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT (Chrome 105.0.5195.136)
106 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4 (chrome 103)
104 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
77 Points -27%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)
37643 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)
34767 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (33046 - 35255, n=3)
33846 Points +2%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
33046 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT (Chrome)
33046 Points
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
32109 Points -3%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * -51%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1809 ms * -42%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (chrome 103)
1792.1 ms * -41%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * -22%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
1531.6 ms * -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (1274 - 1447, n=3)
1349 ms * -6%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
1335 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT (Chrome 105.0.5195.136)
1273.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

快速的UFS 3.1存储有助于小米Poco X4 GT实现出色的读写速度。除其他外,这一点在应用程序的加载时间非常短中可见一斑。该设备的4K随机读写速度也远远高于平均水平。

Xiaomi Poco X4 GTGoogle Pixel 6aMotorola Edge 30OnePlus Nord 2 5GSamsung Galaxy A53Xiaomi Poco F4Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-43%
-33%
-25%
-59%
-46%
-37%
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB
1877.54
1312.64
-30%
1514.62
-19%
1827
-3%
510.1
-73%
1371.56
-27%
1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=60)
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
1283.77
712.94
-44%
965.35
-25%
1256
-2%
486.7
-62%
701.06
-45%
Random Read 4KB
389.91
219.53
-44%
241.72
-38%
223.7
-43%
229.9
-41%
183.61
-53%
Random Write 4KB
502.96
225.61
-55%
249.14
-50%
239
-52%
210.8
-58%
200.41
-60%

游戏--即使在最大设置下也能实现流畅的游戏。

联发科Dimensity 8100 及其ARM Mali-G610 MP6 集成GPU,使Poco X4 GT成为一款强大的游戏手机。像Subway Surfers和Armajet这样画面简单的游戏能以高帧率稳定运行。像《PUBG Mobile》这样要求更高的游戏,在最高设置下也能顺利运行。在 "高清/高 "设置下,你肯定能获得超过30FPS的帧率,但手机不允许超过这个数值--可能是为了限制电力使用。在PUBG手机中,"HDR/Extreme "是你在手机上可以选择的最高设置。

我们用GameBench测量了游戏中的帧率。

地铁冲浪者
地铁冲浪者
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø119.6 (114-121)
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT; PUBG Mobile; 2.1.0: Ø29.7 (28-31)
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT; Subway Surfers; 3.1.0: Ø60.3 (54-61)

排放 - 即使在负载下也能保持低温

温度

Poco X4 GT的表面温度保持在可接受的范围内,没有超过35.1℃(95.2℉)。即使在负载情况下,中心的温度也只上升到34°C(93.2°F),这意味着这款手机最多只有温暖的触感,拿在手里总是很舒服。

正如3DMark Wild Life压力测试所示,手机在运行负载时可能会出现节流现象。也就是说,在SoC切换到较低的时钟速度之前,已经运行了相当多的基准测试。不过,在实践中,你可能不会注意到它,因为尽管CPU功率降低,手机仍然提供足够的性能来处理各种日常任务。

Max. Load
 33.9 °C34.2 °C34.9 °C 
 33.5 °C34.2 °C35.1 °C 
 33.5 °C32.8 °C33.8 °C 
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Average: 34 °C
31.9 °C33.3 °C34.3 °C
32.8 °C33.2 °C34.5 °C
32.9 °C33.2 °C33.9 °C
Maximum: 34.5 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % +23%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.8 % +22%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91.5 % +13%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80.9 %
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.4 % -24%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42.9 % -47%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % +31%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 % +29%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.8 % +16%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.6 %
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.6 % -12%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49.2 % -35%
0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.99 (6.52-8.62)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.52 (6.17-12.6)
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.57 (4.54-4.59)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø6.11 (6-6.84)
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø32.7 (28.5-35.2)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.7 (17.4-40.5)
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.9 (21.2-23.2)

发言人

立体声扬声器位于Poco X4 GT的两个短边。它们支持杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos),可以达到86.1 dB(A)的相当高的音量,而且没有任何失真。扬声器产生的中音和高音听起来非常平衡,但你很难找到任何低音。

有一个3.5毫米的音频插孔,用于将Poco X4 GT连接到有线音频设备。它的信噪比为88.4dBFS,非常好。该手机还可以通过蓝牙5.3连接到无线设备,并支持常见的音频编解码器,如AAC、SBC、LDAC、aptX HD、aptX自适应音频和aptX TWS+。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204344.72530.434.83123.233.54023.326.55036.433.16324.124.68020.321.310017.625.812515.728.716013.846.220016.247.725015.155.231512.660.340013.159.950013.167.463012.770.280014.773.1100013.473.2125012.873.9160012.872.5200012.873.2250013.276.2315013.774.1400013.978.8500013.175630013.974.6800013.368.5100001469.31250014.269.11600013.658.2SPL25.686.1N0.766.3median 13.6median 69.3Delta0.98.25338.644.538.433.728.833.434.535.837.630.128.621.323.52121.516.327.714.738.212.94514.351.21353.110.857.112.362.713.566.519.571.61578.514.177.914.97611.976.612.87615.472.616.573.216.767.517.272.31865.117.963.817.658.518.351.82886.10.962.1median 15median 65.12.210.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco X4 GTSamsung Galaxy A53
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 一小时内快速充电

消耗功率

小米为该手机配备了一个67瓦的充电器。在我们的测试中,使用提供的充电器,Poco X4 GT能够在59分钟内完全充电。电池从零到80%大约需要40分钟。不幸的是,这款手机不支持无线充电。

在耗电方面,Poco X4 GT的表现并不十分抢眼。它比对比中的其他设备耗电多得多,尤其是在空闲状态下,而且在负载下也不是很高效。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.78 / 1.98 / 2.01 Watt
Load midlight 4.43 / 8.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
5080 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Motorola Edge 30
4020 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F4
4500 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
16%
-1%
4%
19%
-2%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
0.68
13%
0.9
-15%
0.8
-3%
0.9
-15%
0.8
-3%
1.087 ?(0.78 - 1.38, n=3)
-39%
Idle Average *
1.98
1.56
21%
1.2
39%
1.2
39%
1.3
34%
1.29
35%
1.77 ?(1.5 - 1.98, n=3)
11%
Idle Maximum *
2.01
1.58
21%
1.5
25%
1.6
20%
1.6
20%
1.38
31%
Load Average *
4.43
5.37
-21%
3.6
19%
5.7
-29%
5.7
-29%
3.78
15%
Load Maximum *
8.2
8.74
-7%
7.1
13%
10.9
-33%
7.3
11%
6.71
18%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT MediaTek Dimensity 8100: Ø4.47 (1.084-8.88)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280: Ø7.03 (4.38-10.4)
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø5.05 (1.054-9.75)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT MediaTek Dimensity 8100; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.97 (5.3-6.95)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.55 (7.22-9.66)
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.89 (7.01-8.31)
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT MediaTek Dimensity 8100; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.3 (2.21-2.4)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.129 (0.898-1.623)
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.987 (0.869-1.276)

电池寿命

5080毫安时的电池使小米Poco X4 GT的电池寿命非常长。在我们旨在模拟网络浏览的测试中,该设备运行了近15.5小时(屏幕亮度调整到150cd/m²;使用脚本每30秒访问不同的网站)。在视频播放期间,电池寿命增加到近18小时。

总的来说,Poco X4 GT的电池寿命比比较中的几乎所有其他设备都长。只有 谷歌Pixel 6a在所有的电池测试情况下,持续时间略长。小米手机在不充电的情况下撑过一天应该没有问题。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
42h 32min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 55min
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
5080 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Motorola Edge 30
4020 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F4
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
-21%
-6%
-5%
-26%
Reader / Idle
2552
1878
-26%
1604
-37%
1926
-25%
2431
-5%
1342
-47%
H.264
1065
1318
24%
1002
-6%
1126
6%
1146
8%
929
-13%
WiFi v1.3
929
768
-17%
638
-31%
958
3%
886
-5%
665
-28%
Load
295
360
22%
268
-9%
272
-8%
246
-17%
246
-17%

Pros

+ 144赫兹显示
+ 卓越的性能
+ 最新的无线标准
+ 精确的GPS
+ 立体声扬声器
+ 白天有良好的摄像头
+ 包括67瓦的充电器

Cons

- 没有microSD插槽
- 没有4K视频的稳定功能
- 没有OLED面板
- 没有通知LED

对小米Poco X4 GT的评判

小米Poco X4 GT评测。评测单位由小米德国公司友好地提供。
小米Poco X4 GT评测。评测单位由小米德国公司友好地提供。

小米Poco X4 GT是一款优秀的中端智能手机,为日常使用提供了足够的性能,在进行多任务处理或处理高要求的游戏时,不会出汗。此外,由于其自适应144赫兹显示屏,使用起来非常流畅。你将不得不使用塑料手机机身,但该设备看起来很好,而且组合得很好。

在典型的Poco时尚中,手机的其余部分同样充满了功能。除了一对立体声扬声器,还有一个3.5毫米的音频插孔。这款手机还支持当前的无线标准,拥有Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5.3功能。6400万像素的摄像头能很好地完成其工作,并在最佳照明条件下产生令人尊敬的图像。附带的附件使这个伟大的整体包装更上一层楼,即一个保护套和一个67瓦的充电器。

快速的处理器、144赫兹的显示屏、大电池和快速充电--小米Poco X4 GT的官方标价为380欧元,具有很大价值。

但Poco X4 GT并非没有缺点。我们的主要抱怨是:IPS显示屏。虽然它非常值得尊敬,但同一价格范围内的许多其他手机已经采用了AMOLED面板。这也使得这款手机更难卖。例如,小米Poco F4的速度和它差不多,价格也贵不了多少,但它的OLED屏幕要亮得多。

除Poco F4外,小米Poco X4 GT的替代品包括谷歌Pixel 6a摩托罗拉Edge 30三星Galaxy A53

价格和可用性

在本评论发表时,小米Poco X4 GT的价格约为328美元,零售商如Amazon.com。.有型号有更多存储空间(256GB),价格为374美元。

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT - 10/10/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
61 / 64 → 96%
Application Performance
84 / 86 → 98%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
67%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Poco X4 GT智能手机评测--实惠的高性能手机,144Hz显示屏
Manuel Masiero, 2022-10-13 (Update: 2024-08-15)