小米Poco F4评测。伟大的智能手机，但缺乏创新

Name: Xiaomi Poco F4
Brand: Xiaomi

微妙的升级。

Poco智能手机代表着良好的性价比。但新的Poco F4与它的前身F3非常相似--甚至处理器也是一样的。此外，制造商的旗舰产品F4 GT已于今年早些时候发布。我们的评论澄清了F4的排名。

Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/22/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Poco F4？我们已经有了这样的说法。这只是几乎真实的，因为Poco推出了F4 GT配备了骁龙8代1号处理器。另一方面，没有GT的F4是去年F3的继任者。 F3该设备有两个配置版本：较小的版本配有6GB内存和128GB存储，而较大的版本提供8GB内存和256GB存储。有三种颜色可供选择：银色、黑色和绿色。我们的评测设备是黑色的，具有较小的存储配置。我们澄清了F4是否在Poco传统中实现了性价比的最高点。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Poco F4 (Poco F Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 104 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE FDD (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28), LTE TDD (Band 38, 40, 41), 5G Sub-6G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 163.2 x 75.95

Battery

4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.79) + 8 MPix (f/2.2) Ultrawide + 2 MPix (f/2.4) Macro
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.45)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, 67W charger, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), SIM tool, case, USB-C to 3.5 millimeter jack adapter, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, Dual-band GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Beidou (B1l, B2a), NavIC, fanless

Weight

195 g, Power Supply: 137 g

Price

350 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86.4 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Xiaomi Poco F4 SD 870, Adreno 650	195 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy A53 Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Xiaomi 12X SD 870, Adreno 650	176 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080
86 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2021	Xiaomi Poco F3 SD 870, Adreno 650	196 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
86.4 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Motorola Edge 30 SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L	155 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
85.4 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	OnePlus Nord 2T Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9	190 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
85.5 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Honor 50 SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L	175 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.57"	2340x1080

表壳 - F4，塑料框架和玻璃背面

Poco F4的背面是玻璃，小米强调厚度减少到7.7毫米，但这不包括突出的相机模块。虽然摄像头明显突出于外壳，但智能手机在平面上并不摇晃。框架是由塑料制成的，但仍然保证了很大的刚性。边缘是直的，使智能手机看起来很有棱角。显示器由康宁大猩猩5号玻璃加固。

在审查期间，我们的审查样本没有产生任何划痕或其他磨损的迹象。智能手机在受力的情况下会有一点扭曲，但没有任何噪音。SIM卡插槽有一个橡胶密封圈，因此，尽管没有IP认证，但该智能手机应该是防水的。做工整体上非常好，缝隙非常小且均匀。

尺寸比较

设备 - 带有双卡和立体声的Poco手机

Poco F4具有双SIM卡功能。它接受两张nano-SIM卡，但不支持eSIM。内部存储不能用micro-SD卡扩展，所以在选择128和256GB的两个存储版本时应该仔细考虑。F4也没有插孔，但Poco至少包括一个插孔到USB-C适配器。作为回报，该智能手机提供了经过杜比全景声认证的立体声扬声器。顶部还有一个红外发射器，所以智能手机可以作为许多设备的遥控器使用。

电源按钮和音量摇杆安装在设备的右侧。开启和关闭智能手机对右撇子来说没有问题，评论员的拇指很容易到达音量减弱按钮。然而，拇指必须伸出来才能按动音量调节按钮。通知LED已经被省略了。相反，F4有一个永远在线的显示屏。最后，面板可以通过抬起它或双击它来激活，以检查收到的信息。

软件 - F4运行在MIUI 13上

Poco与小米的关系在软件上表现得很清楚，因为F4运行的是MIUI 13，它是基于Android 12。在审查时，安全补丁是2022年8月的。UI有一个应用启动器，并预装了第三方应用，如Netflix、Audible、亚马逊、Booking、玄幻影响、Goboo、Joom、Lords Mobile、Spotify、TikTok和WPS Office，但这些都可以卸载。此外，还安装了一些谷歌应用程序和小米公司的程序，如小米视频、ShareMe和小米遥控器。总的来说，在出厂状态下，24GB的存储空间已经被占用。

该软件支持一些手势和按键的快捷方式。例如，用户可以通过三指轻扫手势进行截图，或通过双击电源键启动手电筒。这种手势可以在菜单中定制。Poco还包括一个单手模式，允许你用拇指接触整个显示区域，而不必改变你的握力。

该软件还提供了侧边菜单的选项，可以用来启动个别程序或特殊使用场景中的特殊功能。例如，在游戏时，侧边栏会打开 "游戏加速"，它可以用来快速清理内存或释放存储空间。快速访问屏幕截图也是可能的。此外，还可以选择在设备上实现两个用户账户，可以并行使用。

Poco软件将通知与快速设置分开。向下滑动自拍相机的左边显示当前的通知，而向相机的右边滑动则打开快速设置。从下往上扫，可以打开应用启动器，还可以按通信、娱乐、摄影等类别过滤应用。目前，Poco和小米没有提供任何关于更新时间表的准确信息，但已经表示他们打算长期为设备提供更新。

通信和GNSS - F4配备了5G和Wi-Fi 6

Poco F4支持与欧洲相关的所有频段，包括LTE和5G移动。在测试中，该智能手机的接收没有显示任何异常情况。Poco设备接受两张nano-SIM卡；不支持eSIM。也不支持毫米波标准

Poco F4在家庭网络中支持Wi-Fi 6，表现良好。与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的传输率是坚实的。尽管这款智能手机的性能并不优于竞争设备--三星A53除外--但它仍然是顶级竞争者之一。与它的前辈类似，传输率也非常稳定，没有出现下滑。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	677 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	960 (min: 480) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	345 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	269 (min: 255) MBit/s ∼28%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	736 (min: 644) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	745 (min: 391) MBit/s ∼78%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12	884 (min: 444) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	654 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼85%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	946 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	946 (min: 884) MBit/s ∼69%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	451 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	884 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼92%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12	852 (min: 384) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AX12	769 (min: 725) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%

Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø665 (331-713)

Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø644 (311-702)

Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (480-997)

Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (444-914)

在测试中，事实证明Poco F4在建立与卫星系统的链接方面很迅速。F4支持几个频段的GNSS。经过初步校准后，使用谷歌地图的日常导航效果良好。卫星定位在室内和室外都能在几秒钟内成功。

在与我们的对比设备Garmin Venu 2一起骑自行车时，Poco F4的表现很好，能很好地记录行驶的路线。所记录的总距离几乎没有偏差，与卫星记录一致，即使有弯道和转弯。

电话和语音质量

Poco F4的通话质量是不明显的。对方的声音被清晰地呈现出来，听筒的声音也足够大。F4的用户也很好理解，但背景噪音可以更好地过滤掉。对于手机应用，Poco依靠的是谷歌的软件。用户界面很整洁，排列清晰。

Poco F4同时支持VoLTE和通过WLAN通话。通过扬声器打电话时，F4能清晰地再现声音，特别是在中音和高音部分。声音被自然地再现，即使在高音量下也不会听起来很尖锐。

Cameras - Poco with 64 MPix update

Poco F4在背面提供了三个不同的摄像头，其中两个我们从前代产品中知道。6400万像素的主摄像头是新的，取代了F3的4800万像素的传感器。新传感器的大动态范围给人留下深刻印象。图像处理很迅速，尽管软件进行了大量的后期图像锐化处理。该相机还提供手动专业模式，ISO、白平衡、快门速度、光圈和焦点都可以手动调整。

从主相机到广角相机，质量上的飞跃是巨大的。色彩再现出现偏差，图像显得更苍白，而且还缺乏锐度。微距镜头更像是一个噱头；在光线充足的情况下，可以进行近距离拍摄，但缺乏清晰度。视频录制可以达到4K和60FPS的分辨率，但出厂时只启用了1080P和30FPS。视频记录中的快速自动对焦是一个积极的方面，但记录缺乏良好的稳定性，并很快变得摇晃。

前面使用了一个2000万像素的摄像头，与前代产品一样。波克公司规定，显示屏上的摄像头凹槽直径只有2.67毫米。在良好的光线条件下，可以进行良好的自拍，但在逆光下会出现镜头耀斑。人像模式工作迅速而可靠，甚至头发对相机来说也不是问题。视频录制是可能的，最大分辨率为1080p和30FPS。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Wide angle 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在色彩保真度方面，Poco F4的相机并不是毫发无损。大多数颜色在日光下被大大提亮，但自己看起来很鲜艳。正如预期的那样，在亮度仅为一勒克斯的受控照明条件下，差异明显更大。在同类比较中，F4的相机表现得非常好，尽管三星A53在相同的条件下更真实地渲染了色彩。

图像的锐度很好，但在我们的测试表中，边缘的锐度明显下降了。此外，图片的曝光也不均匀；图片的下边缘比上边缘更亮。在弱光下，物体和细节在Poco的照片中仍然可以识别，但总体上可以更亮。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F4: 10.82 ∆E min: 3.2 - max: 24.83 ∆E

附件和保修 - F4附带一个箱子和快速充电器

Poco F4配有一个67瓦的快速充电器（包括配套的USB-A到USB-C电缆），一个透明塑料外壳，一个USB-C到插孔的适配器，一个屏幕保护膜和一个SIM卡工具。

小米在德国为Poco智能手机提供24个月的保修。这在其他地区可能有所不同，所以购买前一定要向供应商咨询。

输入设备和操作 - F4迅速解锁

Poco使用谷歌的Gboard键盘，因此在纵向和横向模式下的输入都很流畅，通常没有错误。电容式面板支持最多十个手指同时输入。采样率高达360赫兹，屏幕的滑行性能非常好。

这款智能手机可以通过指纹和面部识别来解锁。指纹传感器位于电源按钮上，功能迅速，没有错误的输入。然而，大多数时候，该设备被更不安全的二维面部识别无意中解锁，其工作速度极快。

▶ load Youtube video

显示器 - F4的OLED面板变得非常明亮

Poco在F4中安装了一个刷新率高达120赫兹的OLED显示屏。速率既可以固定在60或120赫兹，也可以由软件根据当前内容动态调整刷新率，在这种情况下，90赫兹的平均值也是可以的。

6.67英寸（16.94厘米）的面板具有高亮度。在测试中，我们确定在启用环境光传感器的情况下，最高值为1274cd/m²，这几乎对应于Poco公司规定的1300尼特。在禁用传感器的情况下，显示屏的最大亮度为502 cd/m²。面板的照度也很好；个别区域之间的差异很小，在日常使用中无法察觉。

显示器是平坦的，没有任何弧度。显示屏的边缘不是特别窄，但非常均匀。Poco在F4中提供了一个永远在线的显示屏。该功能可以以不同的风格进行定制。此外，该功能可以在某些时段停用，这样你就不会在晚上被发光的面板打扰，例如。

我们还测量了PWN。最低亮度时的频率为443赫兹。只要亮度超过51%，频率就是120赫兹，这与显示器的刷新率相对应。没有检测到时间上的抖动。


910 cd/m²	918 cd/m²	943 cd/m²
901 cd/m²	917 cd/m²	939 cd/m²
917 cd/m²	920 cd/m²	939 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 943 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 922.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 917 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Xiaomi Poco F4 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy A53 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Xiaomi 12X OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi Poco F3 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Motorola Edge 30 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	OnePlus Nord 2T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Honor 50 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Screen		6%	31%	29%	4%	-24%	-21%
Brightness middle	917	718 -22%	910 -1%	889 -3%	632 -31%	561 -39%	731 -20%
Brightness	923	730 -21%	908 -2%	902 -2%	630 -32%	573 -38%	722 -22%
Brightness Distribution	96	92 -4%	97 1%	95 -1%	92 -4%	96 0%	97 1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2	1.62 19%	0.8 60%	0.9 55%	1.46 27%	2.67 -34%	3.1 -55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.2	4.21 19%	1.8 65%	1.9 63%	3.32 36%	6.15 -18%	5.8 -12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.5	2 43%	1.3 63%	1.3 63%	2.6 26%	4.1 -17%	4.2 -20%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.156 ^102%	2.25 ^98%	2.26 ^97%	2.209 ^100%	2.245 ^98%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6447 ^101%	6545 ^99%	6414 ^101%	6614 ^98%	6755 ^96%	7104 ^91%	6818 ^95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

443 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 443 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 443 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

▶ load Youtube video

由于其设计，Poco F4的OLED显示屏具有完美的黑色水平和相应的优秀对比度。整体的色彩再现也令人满意；几乎所有色调的偏差都在难以察觉的范围内。

只有灰度和白色的数值不符合要求，显示出更大的偏差。2D CalMAN测试的结果是对sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率高达97.3%。在日常使用中，该面板以清晰的色彩再现令人信服。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.534 ms rise
1.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.523 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.521 ms rise
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4865 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

可以在菜单中激活 "阳光模式"，在晴天时进一步增加面板的亮度。这意味着该设备在任何时候都易于阅读，在比较设备中处于领先地位。

Poco F4在任何时候都易于阅读，即使在阳光直射下也是如此。 — Poco F4在任何时候都易于阅读

Poco显示屏的可视角度稳定性非常好。即使从极端角度看，也能很好地看到内容。智能手机的亮度控制工作迅速而可靠，这确保了在所有照明情况下的良好可读性。

性能 - F4比它的前辈要慢一些

Poco使用了一个组合的骁龙870和一个 Adreno 650在F4中使用，就像F3的前身.即使现在市场上出现了更新的处理器，Poco F4的内置SoC仍然表现良好。然而，在CPU基准测试中也可以看出，Poco F4略微落后于采用该处理器的普通智能手机，也落后于F3的前辈。

尽管Poco F4不得不承认败给了它的前辈和小米12X的速度更快，但其他对比设备在基准测试中并没有机会。该骁龙778G(+)在 Honor 50和摩托罗拉Edge 30处于一个不同的性能级别，正如联发科Dimensity 1300在一加诺德2T和 Exynos 1280中的三星Galaxy A53.

在日常生活中，Poco F4几乎没有达到其极限。应用程序启动迅速，运行无阻。在不同的应用程序之间切换不会使设备出汗，同时在浮动窗口中打开几个应用程序也不会。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	1000 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	998 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=171, last 2 years)	993 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (943 - 1046, n=16)	989 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	963 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	826 Points -14%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	788 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	740 Points -23%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	415 Points -57%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	3377 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	3368 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=171, last 2 years)	3309 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (2725 - 4455, n=16)	3245 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	3007 Points
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2889 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2872 Points -4%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	2700 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1878 Points -38%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points +20%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	714406 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (581322 - 716502, n=13)	682849 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	680139 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	662980 Points
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	600384 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	553328 Points -17%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	519177 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	409976 Points -38%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	15194 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	13610 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=189, last 2 years)	12976 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (9827 - 16054, n=15)	12937 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	12866 Points
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	12076 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	11778 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	11470 Points -11%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	10678 Points -17%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=156, last 2 years)	882 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (719 - 844, n=8)	762 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	734 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	732 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	719 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	579 Points -21%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	6356 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=150, last 2 years)	6288 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5289 - 6369, n=13)	5926 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	5616 Points
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	5551 Points -1%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	5002 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4932 Points -12%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	4856 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3626 Points -35%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10940 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=150, last 2 years)	10177 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	9997 Points +12%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	9996 Points +12%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	9880 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (8463 - 10489, n=13)	9469 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	9002 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	8962 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	7157 Points -20%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	7692 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5689 - 8167, n=13)	7166 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=150, last 2 years)	6745 Points +4%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	6683 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	6506 Points
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6307 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4762 Points -27%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	4699 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3855 Points -41%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=150, last 2 years)	16876 Points +34%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	12801 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	12630 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (10386 - 12801, n=13)	12016 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	10386 Points -18%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	8672 Points -31%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	7516 Points -40%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6659 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	5178 Points -59%
Web
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	1658 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=150, last 2 years)	1561 Points +19%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	1519 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1315 - 1791, n=13)	1517 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1511 Points +15%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1509 Points +15%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	1365 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	1315 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1210 Points -8%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	123847 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (111838 - 123847, n=9)	117183 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	114168 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	111838 Points -2%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	58244 Points -49%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	5777 Points -95%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4714 Points -96%

Poco F4在GPU基准测试中留下了混合的印象。它在一些GFX测量中领先于竞争者，但大多数情况下排名在中间。这款智能手机对于一些屏幕上的测试来说太快了，例如Sling Shot Etreme OpenGL ES 3.1，所以没有显示结果。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1295 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1232 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1222 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1218 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	768 Points -37%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	689 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	621 Points -49%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1324 Points +10%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1237 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1223 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1207 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	764 Points -37%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	694 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	636 Points -47%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4548 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4304 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4273 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4271 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2831 Points -34%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2501 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2275 Points -47%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4623 Points +8%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4309 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4288 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4262 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2814 Points -34%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2492 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2293 Points -46%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5281 Points +25%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4677 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4547 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4211 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4140 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3097 Points -26%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10436 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10287 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9498 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6240 Points -39%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5614 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3982 Points -61%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8576 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7789 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7377 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5763 Points -26%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5375 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3746 Points -52%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10277 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8891 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7970 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7281 Points -18%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6638 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4645 Points -48%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14028 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13857 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12033 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8605 Points -38%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7536 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5510 Points -60%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5309 Points +35%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4732 Points +20%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4684 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3944 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3653 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2997 Points -24%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps +66%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99 fps +62%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	81 fps +33%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +16%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -2%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	200 fps +10%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	200 fps +10%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	182 fps
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	148 fps -19%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	133 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	92 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	102 fps +70%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85 fps +42%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	68 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	129 fps +34%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +24%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -7%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	77 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	61 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps +25%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps +14%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -8%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	48 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	35 fps -41%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +5%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -18%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	38 fps -51%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -7%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	28 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps -52%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -24%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	33 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps -53%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +6%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -16%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps -18%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15 fps -32%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	14 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps -55%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps -56%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -2%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -20%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	32 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps -54%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -3%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -5%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -34%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	38 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps -56%

对浏览器基准测试的结果进行分类是很困难的，因为所取得的结果差异很大，取决于所选择的浏览器。在Chrome浏览器中，Poco F4在Octane 2.0和Jetstream 2测试中处于对比领域的最后一名或其中一名。另一方面，在Edge中，这款智能手机的得分在竞争的智能手机中处于上游水平。因此，当涉及到顶级性能时，Poco UI似乎并没有与当前的Chrome版本特别协调好。速度计2.0基准测试的分数在两个浏览器中相似，并且处于低水平。在日常使用中，无论选择哪个浏览器，在浏览时都不会出现性能问题。页面加载顺畅，甚至许多同时打开的浏览器标签也不会导致系统抽搐或崩溃。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=160, last 2 years)	120.5 Points +24%
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	97.5 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)	96.94 Points
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	90.283 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60.7 - 108.3, n=12)	87.7 Points -10%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)	76.1 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)	75.1 Points -23%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)	66.955 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	63.5 Points -34%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +150%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)	74.8 runs/min +38%
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	72 runs/min +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (51.4 - 77, n=12)	67.2 runs/min +24%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	66.48 runs/min +22%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chome 102)	59.7 runs/min +10%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)	54.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)	51.24 runs/min -6%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	151 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (94 - 155, n=13)	127.5 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)	125 Points +20%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	116 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (chrome 103)	104 Points
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)	102 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	69 Points -34%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)	65 Points -37%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	40652 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=202, last 2 years)	37036 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)	34767 Points
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)	33879 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (20543 - 41256, n=13)	33246 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	32109 Points -8%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)	31134 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)	26577 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	24159 Points -31%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	1920.3 ms * -7%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (chrome 103)	1792.1 ms *
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)	1744 ms * +3%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years)	1574 ms * +12%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)	1427 ms * +20%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)	1406.4 ms * +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1055 - 1792, n=13)	1401 ms * +22%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	1335 ms * +26%
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	1069 ms * +40%

* ... smaller is better

Poco F4有两个存储版本，分别为128和256GB。通过microSD卡进一步扩展存储是不可能的。我们的评测样本是小版本；出厂状态下有104GB。Poco使用UFS 3.1存储，这显然落后于小米12X和一加诺德2T在测试领域。F4似乎拥有与F3相同的内存，因为测量值非常相似。在顺序读写方面，Poco F4略低于UFS 3.1存储的设备平均水平，但在随机值方面略高于平均水平。

	Xiaomi Poco F4	Samsung Galaxy A53	Xiaomi 12X	Xiaomi Poco F3	Motorola Edge 30	OnePlus Nord 2T	Honor 50	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-16%	35%	-1%	26%	46%	8%	20%	61%
Sequential Read 256KB	1371.56	510.1 -63%	1732 26%	1378 0%	1514.62 10%	1891.3 38%	984 -28%	1600 ?(1030 - 3134, n=59) 17%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=191, last 2 years) 34%
Sequential Write 256KB	701.06	486.7 -31%	795 13%	684 -2%	965.35 38%	1300.6 86%	609 -13%	756 ?(233 - 1332, n=59) 8%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=191, last 2 years) 103%
Random Read 4KB	183.61	229.9 25%	291.9 59%	208 13%	241.72 32%	235.8 28%	245.7 34%	244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=59) 33%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=191, last 2 years) 51%
Random Write 4KB	200.41	210.8 5%	279.9 40%	170.6 -15%	249.14 24%	262.2 31%	280.2 40%	243 ?(121.4 - 503, n=59) 21%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=191, last 2 years) 54%

游戏 - F4为当前的游戏提供了足够的性能

的组合骁龙870和 Adreno 650使得Poco F4成为一款可靠的游戏智能手机。目前的游戏，如《PUBG移动版》或《英雄联盟》的《荒野大镖客》，可以在最高或非常高的设置下进行。F4在较简单的游戏中也能达到很高的帧率，如《Deag Trigger 2》，尽管在高图形设置下这些帧率有时会出现强烈的波动，这在Gamebench的测量中可以看到。.尽管如此，游戏中的帧数下降并不令人烦恼，而且帧数不会下降到70FPS以下。当《PUBG Mobile》在最高设置下播放时，帧率只有40 FPS，但仍然非常稳定，游戏始终很流畅。立体声扬声器的定位很好，在游戏过程中没有被覆盖。

Xiaomi Poco F4; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.18: Ø103.4 (76-117)

Xiaomi Poco F4; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.3.0.5735: Ø59.9 (54-61)

Xiaomi Poco F4; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.2.0: Ø59.8 (56-61)

Xiaomi Poco F4; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.2.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放--Poco将骁龙处理器控制住了

温度 - Poco即使在负载下也能保持凉爽

在日常使用中，Poco F4的正面和背面都保持着令人愉快的凉爽。即使在负载情况下，例如在游戏或压力测试中，也只有智能手机的个别区域会有点热，特别是在摄像头旁边的区域。总的来说，Poco从来不会发热，所以可以一直拿着而不感到不适。制造商表示，七层石墨结构与3.1平方毫米的蒸发冷却室相结合，负责芯片的温度管理。该系统在实践中运行良好，能够冷却骁龙870可靠地冷却。

Max. Load

Idle


31.4 °C	31.5 °C	29.9 °C
31.4 °C	31.4 °C	30.4 °C
31.3 °C	31.7 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 31.7 °C
Average: 31 °C


29.2 °C	30.6 °C	30.9 °C
28.9 °C	30.2 °C	31 °C
29.8 °C	30.8 °C	31.6 °C

Maximum: 31.6 °C
Average: 30.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.6 % +9%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.4 % +9%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.8 % +8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91.5 %
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	82.2 % -10%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.8 % -26%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.1 % -35%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.8 % +14%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.1 % +13%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	97.8 % +11%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87.8 %
Xiaomi Poco F3 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	82.2 % -6%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.5 % -23%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65.9 % -25%

Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø6.11 (6-6.84)

Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø6.78 (5-7.42)

Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.9 (21.2-23.2)

Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.3 (17.5-25.8)

发言人

Poco F4的立体声扬声器通过了Dolby Atmos认证，位于设备的前侧。该智能手机的最大音量为86.2分贝，这使得F4的音量相当大，适合在嘈杂的环境中娱乐。即使在高音量下，声音也不会变得尖锐，在设备的底部三分之一处只有轻微的振动。扬声器能相当线性地再现中音和高音，但缺乏低音或低频。

F4不提供插孔连接，但Poco公司在智能手机中包括一个USB-C到音频插孔的适配器。在测试中，通过蓝牙进行的音频输出与几个耳机配合得很完美。该智能手机支持一些音频编解码器，如SBC、AAC、aptX（HD/自适应音频/TWS+）、LDAC和LHDC（V1-4）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco F4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco F3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - F4没有发挥其潜力

消耗功率

Poco F4在功耗方面令人信服，是同类产品中最好的之一。这款智能手机的表现很好，在负载和正常操作下都有较低的速率。引人注目的是，负载下的耗电量明显低于F3的耗电量。F3的前辈和小米12X，它们都使用相同的SoC.

Poco智能手机用67瓦的电源在45分钟内从10%充到100%。将设备从10%充到50%只需要10分钟，而且在这个过程中只会变得很温热。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.12 / 0.17 Watt
Idle	0.8 / 1.29 / 1.38 Watt
Load	3.78 / 6.71 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco F4 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12X 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F3 4520 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 4020 mAh	OnePlus Nord 2T 4500 mAh	Honor 50 4300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-18%	-28%	-11%	-3%	-9%	-57%	-64%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.9 -13%	0.75 6%	0.76 5%	0.9 -13%	0.9 -13%	1.02 -28%	1.23 ?(0.7 - 3, n=13) -54%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.29	1.3 -1%	1.88 -46%	1.29 -0%	1.2 7%	1.3 -1%	2.98 -131%	2.17 ?(0.9 - 4.91, n=13) -68%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -13%
Idle Maximum *	1.38	1.6 -16%	1.94 -41%	1.45 -5%	1.5 -9%	1.7 -23%	3.11 -125%	2.49 ?(1.2 - 5.07, n=13) -80%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -17%
Load Average *	3.78	5.7 -51%	4.99 -32%	4.6 -22%	3.6 5%	4 -6%	3.59 5%	6.39 ?(3.78 - 11.8, n=13) -69%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -71%
Load Maximum *	6.71	7.3 -9%	8.66 -29%	8.87 -32%	7.1 -6%	6.8 -1%	7.12 -6%	9.94 ?(5.5 - 15.9, n=13) -48%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -46%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø5.05 (1.054-9.75)

Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø5.14 (1.004-10.4)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.89 (7.01-8.31)

Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.18 (4-6.32)

Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.987 (0.869-1.276)

Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.237 (1.126-1.787)

电池寿命

虽然Poco F4的功耗值非常好，但与对比设备相比，电池寿命较短。这并不是因为储能的大小，4500毫安时的储能属于同类平均水平。只有摩托罗拉Edge 30有4000毫安时的电池，但它在四项测试中的三项中甚至比Poco F4持续时间更长。

F4的得分也低于其前辈。由于硬件在大多数领域都是一样的，所以希望通过软件更新，运行时间可能会得到改善。不管与其他设备的比较如何，你可以用F4很好地度过一天，而不需要充电，即使它被频繁使用。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		22h 22min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 06min

	Xiaomi Poco F4 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12X 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F3 4520 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 4020 mAh	OnePlus Nord 2T 4500 mAh	Honor 50 4300 mAh
Battery Runtime		34%	48%	18%	8%	31%	36%
Reader / Idle	1342	2431 81%	2116 58%	1562 16%	1604 20%	1936 44%
H.264	929	1146 23%	1381 49%	918 -1%	1002 8%	1158 25%
WiFi v1.3	665	886 33%	1028 55%	805 21%	638 -4%	949 43%	907 36%
Load	246	246 0%	322 31%	329 34%	268 9%	279 13%

Pros

+ 包括67瓦的充电器

+ 明亮的OLED显示屏

+ 平稳的性能

+ 改进的摄像头

Cons

- 创新不多

- 电池寿命相对较差

- 更新不确定

结论 - Poco F4是一个令人信服的整体包装

Poco F4是一款伟大的智能手机。SoC仍然提供了巨大的性能，即使芯片不再是最新的。不管是多任务处理还是当前的游戏，这款智能手机的性能是足够的，在未来几年也应该能坚持下去。显示屏也是一种视觉上的享受。颜色清晰，OLED面板在需要时变得非常明亮，所以户外使用完全没有问题。这使得F4非常适用于媒体消费，因为立体声扬声器也很不错。在照片和视频方面，6400万像素的主摄像头尤其令人印象深刻。广角镜头很有用，微距镜头是一个不错的装饰性配件。总的来说，照片是令人愉快的，包括自拍。慷慨的交货范围包括外壳、屏幕保护膜和强大的67瓦快速充电器，使我们的整体印象更加积极。然而，Poco F4与它的前辈几乎没有区别。变化绝对是不值得的，因为除了设计和主摄像头之外，没有任何重大变化。

Poco F4提供了一个伟大的整体包装，但缺乏改进或创新。

那些寻求最佳性能的人应该看看Poco的 F4 GT它的骁龙8代，但那里的相机设置是相同的。寻找便宜货的人最好选择F3，它的价格较低，配置几乎相同。

价格和可用性

在适用的情况下，建议感兴趣的读者直接通过小米的官方网站查询是否有货。例如，我们发现该设备在UK(￡329),法国(349.90欧元)和意大利(379.90€).

价格截止到22.09，可能会有变化。

Xiaomi Poco F4 - 09/19/2022 v7 ^(old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 75%

Weight

88%

Battery

89%

Display

91%

Games Performance

61 / 64 → 95%

Application Performance

80 / 86 → 93%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

65%

Average

81%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1344 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Poco F4评测。伟大的智能手机，但缺乏创新

Benedikt Winkel, 2022-09-22 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

表壳 - F4，塑料框架和玻璃背面

尺寸比较

设备 - 带有双卡和立体声的Poco手机

软件 - F4运行在MIUI 13上

通信和GNSS - F4配备了5G和Wi-Fi 6

电话和语音质量

Cameras - Poco with 64 MPix update

附件和保修 - F4附带一个箱子和快速充电器

输入设备和操作 - F4迅速解锁

显示器 - F4的OLED面板变得非常明亮

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - F4比它的前辈要慢一些

游戏 - F4为当前的游戏提供了足够的性能

排放--Poco将骁龙处理器控制住了

温度 - Poco即使在负载下也能保持凉爽

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi Poco F4 audio analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 audio analysis

电池寿命 - F4没有发挥其潜力

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - Poco F4是一个令人信服的整体包装

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison