Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy M32 4G智能手机评测--不到300欧元(约345美元)的明亮90Hz屏幕

缩水的电池。

即使三星Galaxy M32比它的前辈更贵,但它只提供一个较小的电池,而且不支持5G。这款三星智能手机的设备和近300欧元(约345元)的价格还能跟得上时代吗?
Android ARM Smartphone
三星Galaxy M32
三星Galaxy M32

三星的Galaxy M系列在这家韩国制造商的产品系列中具有一个奇怪的中间位置。一方面,它与同样涵盖完整中端产品的Galaxy A系列直接竞争,另一方面,它经常在选定的供应商那里独家供应几个月,凭借其有时的高电池容量和各种有趣的设备,它也代表了三星中端产品的一个有趣的延伸。

三星Galaxy M32是以下产品的继任者 Galaxy M31,由于其大电池和出色的AMOLED显示屏而特别有吸引力。最新的机型也提供了高质量的显示屏,此时甚至还具有90-Hz的刷新率。然而,电池已经明显变小。现在,Galaxy M32必须在我们的测试中显示,它是否真的比它的前辈更好,这一点。

Samsung Galaxy M32 (Galaxy M Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G80 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.40 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 159.3 x 74
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25W (Samsung AFC)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (camera 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/​2.2, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, 15 watt charger, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.555W/​kg (head), 1.571W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
180 g
Price
290 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
78.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy M32
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
180 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
79.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2020
Samsung Galaxy M31
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.40"2340x1080
79.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2020
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
203 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80.9 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Motorola Moto G60s
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
212 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.80"2480x1080
81.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
178.8 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080

Galaxy M32的背面有细条纹,我们的深蓝色测试装置有五颜六色的光线折射,与前代产品相比,它看起来是一种升级。指纹传感器已经移到了侧面,因此,现在背面只被相机模块打断了。由于表面发亮,深色版本仍然非常容易受到指纹的影响。

颜色的替代品是明亮的蓝色和白色,但在中欧,并非所有的版本都能从所有的供应商那里买到。这款手机壳显示出扎实的做工,加上圆润的边角,智能手机握起来很舒服。

Galaxy M32的重量为180克(约6.3盎司),也相当轻。与前代产品相比,较小的电池在这里变得很明显。尽管Galaxy M32只是一款中等尺寸的智能手机,但对于真正的小手来说,它可能还是太大。

三星Galaxy M32
三星Galaxy M32
三星Galaxy M32
三星Galaxy M32
三星Galaxy M32

Size Comparison

169.6 mm 75.9 mm 9.6 mm 212 g160.46 mm 74.5 mm 8.29 mm 178.8 g159.3 mm 74.4 mm 9.3 mm 203 g159.2 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 191 g159.3 mm 74 mm 8.4 mm 180 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 大量的存储空间,但只有eMMC

在存储设备方面,Galaxy M32在其价格等级中具有竞争力。现在有128GB的eMMC存储空间,是前代产品的两倍,但标准也比较慢。伴随着的是充足的6GB内存。

NFC也继续搭载,允许你使用移动支付和其他服务。然而,USB-C端口继续只支持USB-2.0标准,但这在这个价格级别中是正常的。

顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风
底部。 3.5毫米音频接口、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
底部。 3.5毫米音频接口、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽
右边:带指纹传感器的待机键,音量摇杆
右边:带指纹传感器的待机键,音量摇杆

微型SD卡读卡器

微型SD卡读卡器与两个SIM卡插槽是分开的。它的运行速度一般,但在复制测试中比这个价格范围内的对比设备快。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
40.7 MB/s
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
22.9 MB/s -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.76 MB/s -54%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.7 (25-43.4)
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø23.2 (10.1-38)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø42.4 (35.4-50.9)
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø60.7 (30.5-64.9)
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.5 (60.1-78.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø84.9 (50.7-89.2)

软件 - 三星承诺不久将升级到Android 12

Galaxy M32有Android 11,预装了三星内部的OneUI 3.1。根据三星的说法,在2022年6月将会更新到Android 12和OneUI 4。在我们测试的时候,安全补丁是2021年11月的水平,所以它们已经有点老了。

虽然你将面临来自三星、微软、Meta和Spotify的预装应用程序,但如果你喜欢一个干净的系统,它们中的大多数可以被卸载,没有任何问题。

三星Galaxy M32 软件
三星Galaxy M32 软件
三星Galaxy M32 软件

通信和GNSS -Galaxy M32中没有5G

三星智能手机仍然不支持5G,尽管在这一点上,你可以得到低于300欧元(约345美元)的智能手机,支持快速互联网,如诺基亚G50,以及Poco M4 Pro,或内部的 Galaxy A22 5G.虽然世界上一些地方有带5G的Galaxy M32版本,但目前在欧洲还没有上市。

支持的4G频率数量还算不错,也应该足以满足一些海外旅行的需要。然而,由于Galaxy M32不是一款世界手机,你还是应该提前了解该智能手机是否确实能够在你的旅行目的地接入移动互联网。

我们对智能手机接收情况的抽查显示,Galaxy M32在室内以及城市附近的室外提供了一个体面的信号质量,尽管它比我们的一些对比设备要低。

这款智能手机支持WiFi 5,并显示出稳定和高的传输速率,在与我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器的测试中处于同类水平。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (334min - 351max) MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
347 (327min - 352max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
300 (259min - 320max) MBit/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (258min - 312max) MBit/s -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (145min - 322max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
339 (294min - 351max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
336 (282min - 350max) MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (259min - 351max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
327 (260min - 333max) MBit/s -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
320 (299min - 340max) MBit/s -4%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M32; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (259-351)
Samsung Galaxy M32; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (327-352)
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

当我们走到户外时,GPS需要一点时间。虽然它最初能识别卫星,但信号质量却不足以定位我们。只有在重新启动设备后,它才能在一段时间后以4米(约13英尺)的精度定位我们。此外,它所识别的卫星数量也不是特别多。

当我们带它去骑车时,三星Galaxy M32有一些问题。它只在第二次尝试后记录了一条可用的路线,但这至少是相当准确的。在第一次的时候,它根本找不到路线,尽管我们在Garmin Venu 2智能手表中的对比GPS没有任何问题。所以那些需要依赖导航设备的人应该避免使用Galaxy M32。

三星Galaxy M32的定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy M32的定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy M32的定位--周转
三星Galaxy M32的定位--周转
三星Galaxy M32定位 - 桥梁
三星Galaxy M32定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2的定位--周转
Garmin Venu 2的定位--周转
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁

电话功能和语音质量 - 语音清晰但不太响亮

三星Galaxy M32的电话应用程序支持所有重要标准,如VoLTE或VoWiFi。

我们通过进行几次测试通话来评估语音质量。虽然我们的对话伙伴证明麦克风的语音还原度很高,但它被各种恼人的噪音破坏了。

我们清楚地听到对话伙伴的声音,但它并不特别响亮。使用内置扬声器的声音相当相似,但你也可以在这里以稍低的音量说话,在安静的环境中,麦克风仍然会可靠地记录我们的声音。

摄像机 - 只有全高清视频

用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

Galaxy M32的主摄像头使用6400万像素的镜头。默认情况下,它以1600万像素的分辨率记录图像,将4个像素合并为一个,以便能够达到更高的感光度。然而,那些喜欢的人也可以使用全量的百万像素。

还有一个800万像素的广角镜头和一个200万像素的微距镜头,以及一个用于模糊人像记录中深度信息的支持摄像头。

在户外和良好的光线条件下,主摄像头产生相当清晰的图像,也可靠地再现了细节。虽然动态范围对于这个价格级别来说是可以接受的,但它并不特别。

在低光照条件和高对比度的情况下,相机在细节再现方面取得了不错的成绩,但一些较暗的区域没有得到充分的照明。

广角镜头拍摄的照片还不错,但一些较大的区域显示得不够干净,小的细节也难以辨认。

视频最高可以录制为1080p和30帧,而在这一点上,4K视频是这个价格级别的其他一些设备的标准配置。录制时,你不能在广角镜头和标准镜头之间切换。此外,视频存在一些明显的图像停顿,在物体边缘的快速移动中尤其明显。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
orginal image
click to load images

在我们实验室的受控光线条件下,主摄像头拍出的照片变得有点苍白,对比度太小。虽然在只有1勒克斯的光线下,一些单独的细节仍然可见,但良好的照明看起来与此不同。

ColorChecker
16.3 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
17 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M32: 12.11 ∆E min: 2.54 - max: 19.92 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
79.3 ∆E
69 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M32: 46.22 ∆E min: 12.85 - max: 79.29 ∆E

附件和保修 - 慢速充电器

Galaxy M32的包装盒包括一个SIM卡工具,一条USB线和一个充电器。然而,后者是令人讨厌的,因为它的最大充电功率只有15瓦,尽管制造商宣传该智能手机的最大充电能力为25瓦。

为此,你需要一个不同的充电器,你要么家里已经有,要么需要购买。我们很难在德国网站上为三星找到相应的充电器,但至少你可以在amazon.com上得到合适的充电器。以合理的价格买到合适的充电器。

三星为欧洲客户提供24个月的保修。如果需要维修,你可以把你的设备送来,或者把它带到众多维修点之一。在保修期外,在德国维修有固定收费,你可以提前在网站上查询。

输入设备和操作 - 一个可靠的指纹传感器

由于采用了90赫兹的屏幕,系统的反应速度显得更快一些,但总体上仍然不是很迅速。触摸屏可以可靠地操作。

右边的硬件按钮是由塑料制成的。它们提供了一个良好而清晰的压力点。稍微凹陷的待机按钮也包括集成的指纹传感器。当你把手指放在上面时,它的反应相当迅速和可靠,手机也能及时解锁。

键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向

显示屏 - 明亮、快速,并且具有良好的色彩准确性

子像素网格
子像素网格

虽然上一代产品还包括一个扩展的全高清分辨率的OLED屏幕,但90赫兹的最大刷新率是新的。这使得屏幕上的动作看起来更加流畅,例如在滚动网站时,系统总体上看起来反应更加灵敏。

在平均亮度为720cd/m²的情况下,显示屏显得相当明亮。没有一个对比设备能提供如此高的亮度。由于采用了OLED技术,你不必担心黑值的问题。由于单个像素可以完全关闭,而且没有背景照明,所以黑色在理论上显得无限黑暗,这也导致其他颜色看起来更加鲜艳。

712
cd/m²
718
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
712
cd/m²
712
cd/m²
741
cd/m²
730
cd/m²
728
cd/m²
725
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 741 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 720.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.77 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 718 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.089
Samsung Galaxy M32
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Samsung Galaxy M31
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Motorola Moto G60s
IPS, 2480x1080, 6.8"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Screen
-22%
-22%
-18%
1%
Brightness middle
712
622
-13%
584
-18%
602
-15%
706
-1%
Brightness
720
615
-15%
586
-19%
564
-22%
701
-3%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
95
0%
83
-13%
98
3%
Black Level *
0.56
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.94
2.25
-16%
2.09
-8%
2.23
-15%
2.1
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.81
6.22
-7%
7.96
-37%
3.99
31%
4.9
16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
2.7
-80%
2.2
-47%
2.6
-73%
1.5
-0%
Gamma
2.089 105%
2.019 109%
2.084 106%
2.32 95%
2.29 96%
CCT
6593 99%
6810 95%
6512 100%
7127 91%
6447 101%
Contrast
1075

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 362.3 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 362.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 362.3 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

在我们使用光谱光度计和CalMAN软件的测量中,我们确定智能手机能够在 "自然 "色彩模式下相当准确地再现色彩和灰度。只有在明亮的绿色色调和明亮的红色中存在稍高的偏差。因此,那些必须依赖准确色彩的人将得到一个可用的显示屏。

我们测量一些PWM,它也是在相当高的亮度水平上使用的。示波器中的曲线几乎没有变化,所以Galaxy M32似乎有一个相当简单的PWM亮度控制。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

由于其屏幕在必要时变得相当明亮,你可以在户外轻松地使用这款智能手机。即使在阳光明媚的日子里,也几乎没有任何问题,当阳光直接照射在显示屏上时,你只需要寻找一个阴凉的地方。

这款智能手机的非常稳定的视角也归功于AMOLED技术,所以你可以从任何位置阅读显示屏,而没有任何明显的颜色变化。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能--在同级别的比较中没有多少动力

这款智能手机的SoC是 联发科Helio G80.由于在本次测试时它已经有将近3年的历史,我们本可以希望为Galaxy M32配备一个更现代的处理器。在处理器性能方面,Galaxy M32只是勉强领先于它的前辈,但至少在图形性能方面的距离变得更大一些。然而,与 摩托G60sRedmi Note 10S,在这个价格范围内也有明显更强大的智能手机。

在日常操作中,这往往转化为对Galaxy M32的一些等待。启动智能手机已经需要时间,而当一些要求较高的应用程序正在运行时,甚至调整音量也需要一些耐心。虽然那些只使用WhatsApp或互联网浏览器等简单应用程序的人不必担心,但一些要求稍高的应用程序可能已经导致设备开始出汗。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
367 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
348 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
347 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
522 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
507 Points +38%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (300 - 387, n=12)
357 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1007 Points +174%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1342 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1325 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1387 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1653 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1685 Points +26%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (790 - 1370, n=12)
1275 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3359 Points +150%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1186 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1345 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1343 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2055 Points +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2258 Points +90%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1109 - 1203, n=10)
1160 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 21892, n=43, last 2 years)
7115 Points +500%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1161 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points +38%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1943 Points +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2248 Points +94%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1100 - 1168, n=10)
1134 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 18407, n=36, last 2 years)
7389 Points +536%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6508 Points
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
8732 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
8236 Points +27%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (5589 - 8120, n=10)
6354 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=192, last 2 years)
13044 Points +100%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1688 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2056 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1829 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3202 Points +90%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1536 - 1845, n=9)
1706 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +149%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1549 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2020 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2011 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3558 Points +130%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1369 - 1701, n=9)
1558 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +206%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2458 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2195 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1390 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2372 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2442 - 2686, n=9)
2561 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1743 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2055 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1824 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3120 Points +79%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1720 - 2054, n=9)
1790 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +537%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1592 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1993 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1995 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3335 Points +109%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1550 - 1903, n=9)
1641 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +1138%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2609 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2308 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1402 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2547 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2552 - 2846, n=9)
2689 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1319 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1601 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1431 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2587 Points +96%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1319 - 1384, n=11)
1348 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1165 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1478 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1436 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2633 Points +126%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1161 - 1204, n=11)
1186 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +180%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2462 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2258 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1415 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2436 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2347 - 2669, n=11)
2527 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1367 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1659 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1491 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2682 Points +96%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1346 - 1387, n=10)
1364 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +468%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1204 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1533 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1499 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2743 Points +128%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1178 - 1875, n=10)
1265 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +858%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2605 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2332 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1463 Points -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2488 Points -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2564 - 2830, n=10)
2674 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1363 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1557 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1487 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2641 Points +94%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1290 - 1398, n=11)
1359 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)
2846 Points +109%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1209 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1442 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1389 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2845 Points +135%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1139 - 1242, n=11)
1206 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)
3095 Points +156%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2456 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2163 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1972 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2110 Points -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2169 - 2698, n=11)
2452 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)
2704 Points +10%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
685 Points
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1373 Points +100%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (679 - 706, n=10)
689 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2840 Points +315%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
683 Points
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1352 Points +98%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (682 - 716, n=10)
690 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7533 Points +1003%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
173 Points
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
387 Points +124%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (171 - 179, n=10)
175 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=188, last 2 years)
2075 Points +1099%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
172 Points
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
381 Points +122%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (171 - 186, n=10)
174.8 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=186, last 2 years)
2068 Points +1102%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
39 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
32 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
25 fps -36%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
68 fps +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
60 fps +54%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (37 - 59, n=7)
47.9 fps +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 166, n=171, last 2 years)
86.6 fps +122%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
44 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
36 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
28 fps -36%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
78 fps +77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
85 fps +93%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (41 - 44, n=7)
43.1 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=171, last 2 years)
286 fps +550%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
21 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
15 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
42 fps +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps +133%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (21 - 43, n=7)
33.3 fps +59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 166, n=171, last 2 years)
76 fps +262%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
24 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
17 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
43 fps +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
52 fps +117%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (23 - 24, n=7)
23.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=171, last 2 years)
168.8 fps +603%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
14 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.9 fps -32%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
26 fps +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
31 fps +138%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (13 - 31, n=7)
22.7 fps +75%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 166, n=171, last 2 years)
66.2 fps +409%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
15 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
16 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps -33%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
29 fps +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
32 fps +113%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (14 - 16, n=7)
14.9 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=171, last 2 years)
119.8 fps +699%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.1 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5.5 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
15 fps +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
18 fps +125%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (7.6 - 17, n=7)
12.6 fps +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 154, n=172, last 2 years)
48.5 fps +506%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.4 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
18 fps +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps +104%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (8.6 - 9.4, n=7)
9.16 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=171, last 2 years)
72 fps +674%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.4 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.2 fps +14%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
16 fps +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps +135%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (7.5 - 18, n=11)
11.7 fps +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)
51.1 fps +531%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.8 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
19 fps +107%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
20 fps +117%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (8.2 - 9.2, n=11)
8.95 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)
81.2 fps +783%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5.7 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5.6 fps +10%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
10 fps +96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
12 fps +135%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (4.8 - 11, n=11)
7.15 fps +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
38.1 fps +647%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3.6 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3.6 fps +9%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7.4 fps +124%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (3.1 - 3.3, n=11)
3.25 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)
32.7 fps +891%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
232228 Points
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
330876 Points +42%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (204040 - 232228, n=5)
212027 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)
810387 Points +249%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
180280 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
187087 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
152185 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
282417 Points +57%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (177851 - 181928, n=4)
180245 Points 0%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6908 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4643 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
12983 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6118 Points -11%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (6865 - 7292, n=4)
7077 Points +2%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2273 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
649 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1623 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3052 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1566 Points -31%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2072 - 2400, n=8)
2243 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6326 Points +178%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5354 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4699 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2839 Points -47%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
4932 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2083 Points -61%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (4045 - 5452, n=8)
4853 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10181 Points +90%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2576 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1775 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1291 Points -50%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
4108 Points +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1012 Points -61%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2343 - 3101, n=8)
2643 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6785 Points +163%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1798 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2168 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2141 Points +19%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3603 Points +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3178 Points +77%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1735 - 1818, n=8)
1790 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
17165 Points +855%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1077 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
884 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1188 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
898 Points -17%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1002 - 1243, n=8)
1122 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1566 Points +45%

在上网时,Galaxy M32在同类产品的比较中并没有给人留下如此糟糕的印象。但在日常操作中,可能需要一段时间才能加载一个网页,你可能需要等待更长时间才能加载图像。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=163, last 2 years)
121.8 Points +261%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
36.79 Points +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (29 - 40, n=8)
34 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
33.78 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
27.81 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
27.63 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
16.92 Points -50%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
72.4 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
58.2 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (54 - 60.8, n=6)
56.8 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
51.7 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
47.5 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
26.66 Points -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=149, last 2 years)
139 runs/min +393%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
33.8 runs/min +20%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chome 83)
29.4 runs/min +4%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chome 86)
29.2 runs/min +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (21.8 - 32, n=8)
28.3 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chome 98)
28.2 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
14.7 runs/min -48%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +203%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
57 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
56 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
56 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (43 - 60, n=7)
49.7 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
49 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
28 Points -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)
37451 Points +245%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
16289 Points +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (10432 - 12744, n=9)
11574 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
10864 Points
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
10687 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
10434 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
4808 Points -56%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
10797 ms * -214%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
4800 ms * -39%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
4786 ms * -39%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (3227 - 4076, n=8)
3513 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
3443 ms *
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
2673 ms * +22%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years)
1556 ms * +55%

* ... smaller is better

我们不明白为什么三星只使用eMMC内存,因为前代产品已经有更快的内存。这就造成了系统整体上的迟钝印象。

Samsung Galaxy M32Samsung Galaxy M31Samsung Galaxy M31sMotorola Moto G60sXiaomi Redmi Note 10SAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
61%
55%
51%
66%
-8%
439%
Sequential Read 256KB
297.3
489.5
65%
490.3
65%
498.5
68%
498.8
68%
Sequential Write 256KB
178.7
221.7
24%
318.4
78%
200.5
12%
372
108%
Random Read 4KB
98
128.9
32%
105
7%
123.3
26%
110.5
13%
82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=76)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
68.8
152.4
122%
117.1
70%
135.3
97%
121
76%

游戏--在90Hz的屏幕上进行60Hz的游戏

使用三星Galaxy M32,你不会得到真正的90Hz游戏,至少在我们测试的游戏中不会。Armajet的要求并不高,它达到了稳定的60赫兹,这使它很容易玩 - 只是没有达到流畅的90赫兹。

在要求更高的《PUBG移动版》中,我们在高设置下测得约30帧,在低设置下约40帧。这使得这款射击游戏在高设置下勉强可以玩,而且你仍然无法避免偶尔的卡顿。 我们用GameBench的软件套件测量帧率。软件套件进行测量。

在我们的测试中,通过触摸屏和位置传感器进行控制没有任何问题。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M32; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60.9 (50-71)
Samsung Galaxy M32; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 1.8.0: Ø39 (31-41)
Samsung Galaxy M32; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.8.0: Ø29.6 (26-31)

排放--升温有限

温度

在较长的负载下,三星智能手机有时会变得相当热,我们在底部测量到43.5℃(110.3°F)的最高温度。虽然这很明显,但并没有什么问题。然而,那些经常把智能手机带到更高的温度环境中的人应该注意,智能手机的热量发展在负载下可能会变得很严重。

Max. Load
 41.9 °C38.8 °C35.2 °C 
 43.3 °C38.9 °C35.2 °C 
 42.5 °C38.1 °C35.3 °C 
Maximum: 43.3 °C
Average: 38.8 °C
31.2 °C37.4 °C39.3 °C
31.2 °C36.7 °C41.1 °C
32.2 °C37.3 °C43.5 °C
Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 36.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.5 (4.08min) %
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
89.9 (1224min) % -9%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
89.8 (7.33min) % -9%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 (2.31min) % +1%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.7 (383min) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.7 (1.03min) %
00.20.40.60.811.21.41.71.92.12.32.52.72.93.13.33.53.73.9Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M32; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.044 (1.03-1.054)
Samsung Galaxy M32; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.12 (4.08-4.14)
热图--正面
热图--正面
热图 - 背面
热图 - 背面

演讲者

三星智能手机的小型单声道扬声器不会变得很响。也许这就是高声部听起来不至于过分强调的原因。然而,声音仍然非常明亮,音乐爱好者不应该计划使用该扬声器进行长时间的聆听。

另一方面,你可以使用蓝牙或3.5毫米音频端口来连接外部音频设备。这方面的工作没有任何问题,而且声音的传输也很清晰。虽然支持aptX编解码器,但更现代的版本,如aptX HD或aptX Adaptive则不支持。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.739.42539.240.13130.929.84033.731.7503735.26330.230.68021.42310019.921.612514.622.216012.528.12009.936.72509.344.63158.250.14008.554.25009.356.96309.85880014.560.1100011.467.4125010.368.816009.367.920009.271.2250010.669.4315011.770.4400011.462.5500012.164630012.669.7800012.869.61000013.564.9125001449.71600014.444.4SPL23.879.8N0.543.8median 11.4median 60.1Delta2.211.936.836.139.940.831.935.138.934.143.736.629.835.325.925.926.326.324.925.521.627.41934.918.942.618.149.416.654.916.256.714.960.81565.715.671.814.973.714.97215.673.814.670.414.268.314.166.414.460.814.662.714.966.915.272.415.464.415.749.26470.627.581.715.825.3147.9median 15.6median 62.7median 14.2median 64.8413.413.316.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M32Samsung Galaxy M31
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M32 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy M31 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 较小的电池,电池寿命较短

消耗功率

当我们仔细观察三星Galaxy M32的功耗时,我们注意到,这款智能手机的整体效率明显高于其 Galaxy M31前代产品。然而,Moto G60s 摩托G60sRedmi Note 10S的效率甚至更高。

特别是在中等和高负荷下,Galaxy M32比一些对比设备使用更多的电力。这可能是由于更亮的显示屏,但也可能是由于整体的电源管理。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.8 / 2.4 Watt
Load midlight 5.1 / 7.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy M32
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M31s
6000 mAh
Motorola Moto G60s
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G80
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-40%
-30%
32%
28%
2%
1%
Idle Minimum *
1
1.6
-60%
1.4
-40%
0.7
30%
0.69
31%
1.025 ?(0.37 - 1.6, n=8)
-3%
Idle Average *
1.8
2.3
-28%
2.2
-22%
0.9
50%
1.46
19%
2.04 ?(0.9 - 4.22, n=8)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
3.7
-54%
3.4
-42%
1.2
50%
1.5
37%
Load Average *
5.1
6.7
-31%
6.3
-24%
4.3
16%
3.67
28%
4.18 ?(2.8 - 6.12, n=8)
18%
Load Maximum *
7.4
9.4
-27%
8.9
-20%
6.4
14%
5.58
25%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M32: Ø6.14 (3.57-9.57)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M32; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.26 (4.02-5.52)
Samsung Galaxy M32; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.22 (2.08-2.38)

电池寿命

前代产品的6000毫安时电池已经成为历史。Galaxy M32不得不使用5000毫安时的电池,但也因此而略显轻巧。

这对电池寿命有很大影响。虽然在我们的WLAN测试中,18:18小时并不是一个糟糕的结果,但前代产品持续了几个小时。然而,Galaxy M32的电池容量应该仍然能够坚持几个工作日,这取决于你如何使用它。在游戏时,它在高负荷情况下可以持续近5个小时。

我们还应该在这里再次提到,该设备可以用相应的充电器以高达25瓦的功率充电,但这并不包括在内。使用包装盒内的15瓦充电器,直到电池完全充电,需要的时间明显超过2小时。一个更快的充电器可以大大缩短充电时间。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 36min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 56min
Samsung Galaxy M32
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M31s
6000 mAh
Motorola Moto G60s
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
19%
17%
-22%
25%
Reader / Idle
2076
2456
18%
2439
17%
1519
-27%
3612
74%
H.264
1137
1432
26%
1416
25%
867
-24%
1172
3%
WiFi v1.3
1098
1324
21%
1309
19%
763
-31%
1087
-1%
Load
296
326
10%
319
8%
283
-4%
368
24%

Pros

+ 90-Hz AMOLED显示屏 ...
+ ...具有高亮度...
+ ...和相当准确的色彩再现
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 相对较轻
+ 合适的照片质量

Cons

- 性能低下
- 附带的充电器很弱
- 没有5G
- 定位系统掉线
- 没有4K视频记录
- 蹩脚的存储

评语--三星很难跟上时代的步伐

测试三星Galaxy M32
测试三星Galaxy M32

当然,Galaxy M32带来了一个明亮的AMOLED屏幕,支持90-Hz刷新率,这很好。毕竟,三星也使这种显示器技术成为现在的样子。另一方面,你也必须接受其他几个妥协:没有快速的5G接收,而且定位系统经常不工作。前代产品的大电池也不复存在,被一个提供5000毫安时的标准模型所取代。

性能值也不能使Galaxy M32领先,而 摩托罗拉Moto G60s小米Redmi Note 10S以同样的价格提供了明显更多的功率。三星像其他许多经济实惠的智能手机一样包括一个15瓦的充电器,但却宣传25瓦的充电技术,这简直是糟糕透顶,特别是如果你考虑到 摩托G60s充电功率高达50瓦,自然也包括相应的充电器。

通过Galaxy M32,三星带来了一款4G智能手机,考虑到它的竞争对手和平庸的定位系统,它并不太令人信服。

就其本身而言,三星Galaxy M32是一款体面的中档4G智能手机,它很轻,不太笨重,而且看起来很优雅,有一个令人印象深刻的明亮显示屏。然而,你必须到其他地方去寻找最佳性价比。

摩托罗拉Moto G60s带来了更快的屏幕,但它采用了IPS技术。此外,你还能得到快速充电技术和更多的电量。那些绝对需要AMOLED屏幕的人可以选择 小米Redmi Note 10S,它也比我们的测试设备提供更多的电力。

价格和可用性

三星Galaxy M32在一些亚洲、欧洲和非洲国家有售,如 印度德国或从网上供应商处购买。

Samsung Galaxy M32 - 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 64%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
15 / 64 → 24%
Application Performance
54 / 86 → 63%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
59%
Average
72%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy M32 4G智能手机评测--不到300欧元(约345美元)的明亮90Hz屏幕
Florian Schmitt, 2022-02-12 (Update: 2024-08-15)