小米红米笔记本 Pro 14 2025 评测--现在采用 Arrow Lake 技术，电池续航时间长达 16 小时
14 英寸笔记本电脑的 IPS 显示屏更加明亮。
2025 RedmiBook Pro 14 配备了英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器、更明亮的 120 Hz IPS 显示屏和更长的电池续航时间。尽管价格有所上涨，但它仍然是一款强劲的中端产品。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论：红米本 Pro 14（2025）仍然是一款可靠的全能型产品，但较高的价格限制了其整体价值。
2025 RedmiBook Pro 14 配备了英特尔最新的箭湖处理器，由于功耗限制较高，因此性能强劲。不过，这也给散热系统和电源带来了压力，导致表面温度过高，并在重负载时产生明显的风扇噪音。
升级后的红米笔记本 Pro 14 保留了哑光 120 Hz IPS 面板，但亮度增加了（500 cd/m² 对 400 cd/m²），同时保持了出色的图像质量。电池续航时间在全亮度状态下略有下降，但总体有所改善，在 150 cd/m² 的 Wi-Fi 测试中达到 16:10 小时，比以前多出约 1.5 小时。端口和输入设备表现良好，但 1080p 网络摄像头的图像质量较差。
不过，较高的价格--现在接近 1100 欧元--是一个不利因素，尤其是这款笔记本电脑还没有在某些地区正式销售。联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14（目前正在评测中，售价 1099 欧元）等竞争机型可能会提供更好的本地可用性和类似的价值。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
红米笔记本 Pro 14 是去年最好的流星湖笔记本之一，2025 型号的 CPU 升级到了酷睿至尊 7 255H，并配备了更亮的 500-nit IPS 显示屏。我们的测试机配备了 32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD，通过 TradingShenzen 的售价为1,087 欧元。
规格
住房和设备
红米笔记本 Pro 14 2025 的设计与 2024 几乎完全相同。 2024 机型仍然采用坚固的铝制外壳。不过，银色表面现在会根据光线的不同呈现出微妙的蓝色。制造质量依然出色，在稳定性和做工方面没有任何问题。180 度铰链经过精心调校，底板可通过 Torx 螺钉轻松拆卸，这样就可以接触到双固态硬盘插槽、Wi-Fi 模块、电池和风扇。
端口保持不变，包括 Thunderbolt 4，并支持日常使用的所有基本标准。不过，Wi-Fi 模块降级为英特尔 AX203，仅支持 80 MHz 的 Wi-Fi 6，传输速度被限制在 1 Gbit/s 以下。200 万像素网络摄像头虽然支持演播室特效和实时字幕，但图像质量仍然很差。这不是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续性
小米没有提供有关红米笔记本 Pro 14 可持续发展或环境影响的任何详细信息。不过，包装主要由纸张或纸板材料制成。
输入设备 - 发光键盘
右侧的 Ctrl 键被换成了副驾驶键，除此之外没有其他变化。背光键盘（通过传感器激活）仍然提供了足够长的笔触、精确的触感和非常舒适的打字体验。电源按钮集成在键盘右上方，包括指纹扫描仪。ClickPad 运行良好，但机械咔哒声有点响。
显示屏 - 500 尼特 IPS
14 英寸 IPS 显示屏仍采用 2.8K 分辨率（2,880 x 1,800，16:10）和 120 Hz 频率，但最大亮度已从 400 cd/m² 提高到 500 cd/m²，我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。黑阶的影响很小（0.37 cd/m²），但最大对比度仍达到约 1,400:1。主观画质非常好，色彩鲜艳，动作流畅。没有 PWM 闪烁，响应时间也不明显，但在亮度较高时有轻微的光晕。亮度和色温都可以通过传感器自动控制。
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析后发现，出厂配置文件已经非常准确，但略微过冷。我们自己的校准也改善了显示效果，只是蓝色偏差略高。sRGB 色彩空间已完全覆盖。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 516 cd/m²
Contrast: 1395:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
71.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 MNE007ZA3-5, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 TL140ADXP21-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 26% | 26% | 21% | 1% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.3 | 72 2% | 99.9 42% | 99.9 42% | 98 39% | 71 1% | 70.3 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.9 | 72.9 1% | 97.2 35% | 97.6 36% | 88.1 23% | 72.8 1% | 72.1 0% |
| Response Times | -47% | 92% | 95% | 97% | -10% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.7 ? | 33.7 ? -26% | 1.3 ? 95% | 0.8 ? 97% | 0.44 ? 98% | 26.3 ? 1% | 32.7 ? -22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.1 ? | 18.7 ? -68% | 1.2 ? 89% | 0.8 ? 93% | 0.61 ? 95% | 13.4 ? -21% | 15.2 ? -37% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 60 ? | 240 ? | ||||
| Screen | 14% | 92% | 360% | 9% | 6% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 516 | 437 -15% | 385 -25% | 500 -3% | 400 -22% | 421 -18% | 418 -19% |
| Brightness | 518 | 412 -20% | 382 -26% | 499 -4% | 403 -22% | 412 -20% | 408 -21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 87 -8% | 95 0% | 97 2% | 97 2% | 90 -5% | 90 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.21 43% | 0.03 92% | 0.01 97% | 0.32 14% | 0.3 19% | |
| Contrast | 1395 | 2081 49% | 12833 820% | 50000 3484% | 1316 -6% | 1393 0% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.4 18% | 1.99 -17% | 3.55 -109% | 1 41% | 1.3 24% | 1.6 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.2 | 2.4 25% | 3.69 -15% | 6.38 -99% | 2.8 12% | 2.4 25% | 2.5 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1 9% | 1.79 -63% | 2.55 -132% | 1.1 -0% | 1.1 -0% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.8 22% | 0.8 65% | 2.2 4% | 1.3 43% | 1.4 39% | 2 13% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.204 100% | 1.94 113% | 2.23 99% | 2.14 103% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6942 94% | 6392 102% | 6474 100% | 6405 101% | 6586 99% | 6446 101% | 6851 95% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
2% | 70% /
78% | 160% /
251% | 42% /
28% | -1% /
3% | -9% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8516 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - Arrow Lake 和最大32 GB 内存
测试条件
红米笔记本 Pro 14 不包含任何自定义或设备特定的电源配置文件。所有基准测试和测量均使用 Windows 的 "最佳性能 "模式进行，以确保输出最高性能。
处理器 - Core Ultra 7 255H
新 酷睿至尊 7 255H取代了之前的 酷睿至尊 7 155H的 红米笔记本 Pro.它具有 16 个内核，不带超线程功能，在测试设备中的功耗可短暂达到 115 瓦，然后稳定在 45 瓦，偶尔会飙升到 70 瓦。整体基准性能非常强劲。在电池模式下，功率峰值为 55 瓦，性能仅略微下降了约 7%。
Cinebench R15 Multicore
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (15776 - 17489, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (2858 - 2923, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3655, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
系统性能
强大的基准测试结果证实，红米笔记本 Pro 14 的整体性能非常出色。在测试过程中，系统稳定性完美无瑕，32 GB LPDDR5x-8400 内存确保了充足的内存，可满足苛刻的多任务和生产力工作负载的要求。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2018, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 479, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (278 - 1104, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7678 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在标准延迟测试（包括网页浏览、4K YouTube 播放和 CPU 负载）中，即使安装了最新的 BIOS 版本，红米笔记本 Pro 14 (2025) 在实时音频应用方面也表现出了轻微的局限性。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
采用 PCIe 4.0 接口的 M.2-2242 格式 1 TB SSD (YMTC PC411) 性能非常出色，即使在持续负载的情况下也能保持稳定的传输速率。由于额外的 M.2-2242 插槽，存储扩展非常简单。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Power Draw: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在Time Spy 基准测试中，集成的 Arc Graphics 140T 比前代 8 核 Arc GPU 快约 15%，但实际差异不大。在游戏方面，新款红米本 Pro 14 平均只比上一代产品提高了 4%。尽管如此，对于集成 GPU 而言，游戏性能仍然很稳定，而且 Thunderbolt 4 的存在还允许在需要时提供外部 GPU 支持。无论是在电池模式下还是在长时间使用时，GPU 性能都能保持稳定。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13428 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8919 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4694 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 912 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3683 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 3679 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Arc Graphics 140T (295 - 417, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 176.5 | 165.2 | 41.2 | 17.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 109.1 | 78.3 | 88.1 | 94.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 80.1 | 44.2 | 31.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 56.4 | 47.3 | 37.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 208 | 83.6 | 71.2 | 59 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.1 | 30 | 25.1 | 24.7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 40.8 | 33.5 | 28.7 | 26.5 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
双风扇系统在空闲和轻度任务时保持静音，经常完全关闭。不过，在重负载情况下，高功率限制就会显现出来：游戏时风扇噪音约为 42 分贝（A），压力测试时高达 45 分贝（A）--清晰可闻，但音调并不难听。测试设备上没有发现线圈啸叫或其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 23.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 30 / 45.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) | ||
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Arc 140T, Ultra 7 255H, YMTC PC411-1TB | Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 1% | -9% | -5% | -3% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 23.8 | 23.6 1% | 24.2 -2% | 25 -5% | 23.8 -0% | 24.7 -4% | 23.8 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 23.6 1% | 24.2 -2% | 25 -5% | 23.8 -0% | 24.7 -4% | 23.8 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 23.8 | 23.6 1% | 24.2 -2% | 26 -9% | 23.8 -0% | 24.7 -4% | 23.8 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.8 | 25.7 -8% | 24.2 -2% | 29 -22% | 23.8 -0% | 26.3 -11% | 27.1 -14% |
| Load Average * | 30 | 31.9 -6% | 28.8 4% | 40 -33% | 44.6 -49% | 37.6 -25% | 34.9 -16% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 42.2 | 34.4 18% | 37.6 11% | 40 5% | 35.9 15% | 37.6 11% | 43.7 -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.3 | 34.4 24% | 45.6 -1% | 41 9% | 44.6 2% | 37.6 17% | 43.7 4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在日常使用中，表面温度没有问题，但在重负载情况下，设备会变得太热，不适合放在膝上使用。在游戏和压力测试中，我们记录到的温度约为 50 °C，明显高于前代机型。TDP 值升高是造成这种情况的原因之一，处理器的功耗在持续负载时会在 45-70 瓦之间波动，短暂时可达 120 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.1 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-1.3 °C / -2.3 F).
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 10% | 6% | 4% | 3% | 0% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.9 | 38.6 8% | 38.4 8% | 41 2% | 42 -0% | 41.7 -0% | 43.7 -4% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 52.1 | 45.1 13% | 49.7 5% | 45 14% | 40.6 22% | 50.1 4% | 49.4 5% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.3 | 24.4 7% | 25.1 5% | 26 1% | 28.2 -7% | 27.1 -3% | 27.7 -5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.4 | 24.6 10% | 25.8 6% | 28 -2% | 28.9 -5% | 27.7 -1% | 28.6 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
扬声器
扬声器没有任何改动，整体效果令人满意，尽管声音还可以更有力一些。不过，竞争对手也好不到哪里去。
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
由于显示屏更亮，功耗略有增加。在压力测试过程中，100 瓦的电源适配器曾一度成为限制因素，因为根据 HWiNFO 的数据，系统功耗可能超过 150 瓦。在这种情况下，电池必须临时提供额外的电力。随着时间的推移，耗电量在 72 到 88 瓦之间波动，与处理器的 TDP 行为一致。虽然 100 瓦插入式适配器结构紧凑，但功率略显不足，而且运行温度很高，持续负载下温度超过 60 °C。
| Off / Standby | 0.52 / 0.58 Watt |
| Idle | 5.2 / 9.3 / 10.3 Watt |
| Load |
56.5 / 101.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Arc 140T, Ultra 7 255H, YMTC PC411-1TB | Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 37% | 29% | 3% | 5% | -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 3.3 37% | 2.7 48% | 5 4% | 5.5 -6% | 4.6 12% | 4.4 15% |
| Idle Average * | 9.3 | 8.4 10% | 6.7 28% | 6 35% | 7.6 18% | 7.8 16% | 9.2 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.3 | 9.6 7% | 6.9 33% | 10 3% | 7.9 23% | 8 22% | 9.6 7% |
| Load Average * | 56.5 | 51.9 8% | 34.5 39% | 36 36% | 77.9 -38% | 71.7 -27% | 62.6 -11% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 70 | 51 27% | 43 39% | 41.6 41% | 63 10% | 71.4 -2% | 71.5 -2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 65 | 51 22% | 41.9 36% | 38.2 41% | 61.5 5% | 68.5 -5% | 71.9 -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 101.8 | 63.2 38% | 62.7 38% | 60 41% | 94.8 7% | 83 18% | 101.7 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Usage Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power draw using an external Monitor
电池寿命
在 150 cd/m² 的 Wi-Fi 测试中，电池续航时间略有提高，现在达到了 16 小时。即使在全亮度条件下，红米笔记本 Pro 14 的续航能力仍然很强，续航时间略低于 10.5 小时--由于显示屏更亮，续航时间比以前略少。
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025
- 04/07/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.3%  | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $18.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Back Protector... 3. $32.99 Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec... List Price: 1090€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
2. 85.9%  | Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Intel Core 5 220H ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 3. $20.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Clear Protecto... List Price: 880€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
3. 85.9%  | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $949.49 ASUS Vivobook S 14 Copilot+ ... 2. $1,159.00 ASUS Vivobook S 14 Copilot+ ... 3. $1,094.16 ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED Slim... List Price: 1099€ | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
4. 83.5%  | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
5. 85.1%  | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $969.99 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9-202... 2. $799.98 Lenovo Yoga 7 7i 2-in-1 Lapt... 3. $15.99 2 Pack Tempered Glass Screen... List Price: 1599€ | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI OLED |
6. 84.9%  | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1200€ | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
7. 85.5%  | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $18.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 2. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 3. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... List Price: 870€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
