小米 RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 笔记本电脑评测--性能强劲、价格实惠的超极本
我们最近测试了 16 英寸版本的红米笔记本 Pro现在,我们来看看更小的 14 英寸版本。它的整体概念是一样的,铝制外壳内搭载了英特尔最新的流星湖处理器(Meteor Lake CPU)和最多 32 GB 的内存。这款笔记本电脑采用哑光 IPS 显示屏,亮度为 400 尼特,刷新率为 120 Hz,完全覆盖 sRGB。
我们的测试设备是高端版本,配备酷睿至尊 7 155H、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD,进口价格约为 950 美元。小米公司本身没有在美国正式销售其笔记本电脑。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.5 % | 07 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
83.5 % | 06 / 2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
82 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | SCHENKER Work 14 Base i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 20.2 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 18.99 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接
红米笔记本 Pro 14 采用银色铝合金外壳,并带有微妙的绿色调。它看起来非常时尚,总的来说,它的圆边设计看起来很棒--我们也喜欢它的边框不是最宽的。我们没有注意到任何有关其稳定性或制造质量的问题。虽然显示屏的盖子比底座更灵活一些,在用力时会出现轻微的图像误差,但这在日常使用中应该不成问题。它的铰链设置得很好,屏幕不会有太大的晃动,同时还能让你单手轻松将其打开到最大 180 度。
笔记本电脑的端口包括所有最重要的标准,包括 Thunderbolt 4、HDMI 和 USB-A。只是没有 microSD 读卡器。WLAN 模块(英特尔 AX211)支持 Wi-Fi 6E 标准,传输速率良好。该设备的 1080p 网络摄像头可完成其工作,但拍摄的照片并不特别美观。尽管如此,它还是支持 Windows 的所有最新 Studio Effects。
Networking | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
维护
机箱下盖用 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定,可以轻松取下。在机箱内部,你可以看到风扇、电池、M.2 模块和 M.2 2242 固态硬盘。不过,内存是焊接上去的,无法更换/扩展。
输入设备 - 良好的键盘
与较大的红米笔记本 Pro 16 一样,较小的机型也配备了同样漂亮的背光键盘。它的按键具有足够的提升力和精确的敲击,这意味着即使输入较长的文字也会感觉舒适。点击板(12.5 x 8.3 厘米)漂亮而平滑,我们在测试中使用它时没有任何问题。键盘底部可以向下按压,但会发出响亮的 "咔嗒 "声。
显示屏 - 120-Hz 2.8K IPS
红米笔记本 Pro 14 配备了一块 16:10 的 14 英寸面板,表面采用哑光处理,因此光线内容看起来不会有颗粒感。由于分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800,它的画面清晰锐利,动作也因刷新率(120 Hz)的提高而受益。此外,它的响应时间也不错,没有使用 PWM,我们也没有注意到背光出血的问题。
制造商标称其亮度为 400 cd/m²,而我们的平均测量值为 408 cd/m²。同时,对于 IPS 面板来说,0.3 cd/m² 的黑色值也相当不错,因此整体对比度约为 1,400:1。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 414 cd/m²
Contrast: 1393:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2" | SCHENKER Work 14 Base B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 BOE NV14N44, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 2% | 20% | 26% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.3 | 72.42 3% | 72.4 3% | 98.6 40% | 99.9 42% | 69.3 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 99.79 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.5 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.1 | 73.94 3% | 73.8 2% | 87.3 21% | 98.9 37% | 71.4 -1% |
Response Times | 17% | -106% | 94% | 97% | -51% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.7 ? | 7 ? 79% | 60 ? -83% | 1.31 ? 96% | 0.61 ? 98% | 41 ? -25% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.2 ? | 22 ? -45% | 34.7 ? -128% | 1.2 ? 92% | 0.67 ? 96% | 26.8 ? -76% |
PWM Frequency | 238 ? | 480 ? | 240 ? | |||
Screen | 192% | -6% | 355% | -39% | -53% | |
Brightness middle | 418 | 373 -11% | 402 -4% | 387 -7% | 411 -2% | 403.2 -4% |
Brightness | 408 | 377 -8% | 404 -1% | 386 -5% | 414 1% | 388 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 89 -1% | 98 9% | 99 10% | 93 3% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.015 95% | 0.16 47% | 0.01 97% | 0.27 10% | |
Contrast | 1393 | 24867 1685% | 2513 80% | 38700 2678% | 1493 7% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.47 8% | 2.2 -38% | 1 37% | 2.8 -75% | 4.15 -159% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 2.49 -0% | 4.2 -68% | 2.4 4% | 5.5 -120% | 6.92 -177% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.78 -62% | 1.3 -18% | 2.2 -100% | 1.04 5% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.7 15% | 3 -50% | 1.4 30% | 1.8 10% | 5.1 -155% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.179 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6851 95% | 6556 99% | 6801 96% | 6466 101% | 6319 103% | 6677 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 70% /
126% | -37% /
-19% | 156% /
238% | 28% /
-0% | -35% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱后,笔记本电脑的显示屏已经校准良好。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)进行分析后发现,偏蓝现象极少,但总体而言,所有数值都低于 3 的重要偏差--色彩方面也是如此。使用我们自己的校准软件(可在上面免费下载配置文件),我们可以略微优化其显示效果,但这并非完全必要。得益于其完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围,该面板非常适合编辑照片/视频。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.1 ms rise | |
↘ 10.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 17.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
这款笔记本电脑的哑光显示屏有助于在户外使用,但我们希望在超亮的天气里能有更亮的面板。在视角稳定性方面,我们没有发现任何问题。
性能 - 英特尔流星湖处理器和 32GB 内存
测试条件
RedmiBook Pro 14 没有提供额外的能源配置文件,以下测量和基准测试均使用 Windows 性能模式下的最高性能进行。
处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 7 155H在红米本 Pro 14 中,最新一代流星湖处理器的短暂功耗高达 100 瓦,在长时间负载情况下,功耗值最终稳定在 45 瓦。这些高数值确保了相应的良好基准测试结果。不过,这还不足以与 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14(60/50 瓦)。在我们的 Cinebench 循环测试中,运行几次后,其性能下降了约 13%。在电池模式下,CPU 的功耗降至 65/35 瓦,因此在我们的测试中其多核性能略有下降(-8%)。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见 技术部分。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=48) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=62, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=48) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=62, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=52) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=64, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=48) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=44) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=46) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=51) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=48) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=48) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=48) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (37.5 - 79.2, n=45) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=45) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=46) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=46) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=46) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=46) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=46) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=46) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
系统性能
在日常使用中,红米笔记本 Pro 14 的速度超快,我们在测试过程中没有发现系统稳定性方面的问题。它的基准测试结果也非常好,32 GB 的内存让你在未来几年里都能使用自如。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7045 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117897, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=46) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=46) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有显示出任何重大限制。有一个驱动程序确实有些故障,但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值很低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备安装了一个 1 TB 的固态硬盘(YMTC PC300),但默认情况下该固态硬盘被分成两个分区。这是不必要的,系统驱动器上仅有 150 GB 的可用空间(其余 757 GB 位于驱动器 D)。如果在下载和安装程序时不小心,可能很快就会遇到容量问题。紧凑型 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘(M.2 2242)的性能完全够用,但在长时间负载情况下并不能保持完全稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡 - Intel Arc Graphics
处理器的集成图形处理器(GPU Arc Graphics负责图形计算。这使它成为英特尔目前提供的速度最快的 iGPU,并与 酷睿至尊 7 155H与酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 配合使用,其最高内核时钟频率可达 2,250 MHz。iGPU 还得益于快速的 LPDDR5x-7467 RAM,红米笔记本 Pro 14 在 GPU 基准测试中的表现超过了所有竞争对手。
它的游戏性能同样出色,不过,它领先于 AMD Radeon 780M的领先优势未能保持。即便如此,在我们的游戏测试中,这两款 GPU 的性能还是不相上下。许多老游戏或要求不高的游戏都能在 1080p 高细节设置下流畅运行,但在玩诸如《博德之门 3》或《赛 博 朋克 2077》等时下流行的游戏时,你就不得不忍受低细节或使用 XeSS 等升频技术了。在长时间负载和电池模式下,笔记本电脑的游戏性能依然稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 13748 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8911 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4064 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=38) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Average of class Subnotebook (210 - 364, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (208 - 261, n=13) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=60, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cyberpunk 2077 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 166.5 | 158.8 | 51.2 | 20.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 157 | 92 | 48 | 24 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 103.2 | 93.5 | 74 | 74 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 82.9 | 45.3 | 31.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 55 | 47.4 | 39.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 76 | 46 | 43 | 40 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 204 | 86 | 71 | 58 |
F1 23 (2023) | 83.2 | 76.3 | 50.9 | 14.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.6 | 29.7 | 25.3 | 24.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 36.4 | 31 | 26.2 | 23.8 |
排放与动力
噪音排放
红米笔记本 Pro 14 有两个风扇,在日常使用过程中,设备经常保持非常安静。在完成要求不高的任务时,风扇通常会保持关闭状态或发出几乎听不到的呼呼声。如果将笔记本电脑置于更高的负载下,风扇的转速会慢慢加快,噪音会达到 35 分贝(A),然后在玩游戏或进行压力测试时,噪音会达到 44 分贝(A)。结束高负荷阶段后,风扇很快又开始缓慢转动。我们在测试设备上没有发现任何其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 27.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.9 / 43.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | SCHENKER Work 14 Base Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 3% | -1% | -3% | -6% | |
off / environment * | 23.8 | 25.11 -6% | 23.6 1% | 25.1 -5% | 23.9 -0% | 23.6 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 25.11 -6% | 23.6 1% | 25.1 -5% | 23.9 -0% | 23.7 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23.8 | 25.11 -6% | 23.6 1% | 25.1 -5% | 23.9 -0% | 23.7 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.1 | 27.2 -0% | 24.8 8% | 25.1 7% | 23.9 12% | 27 -0% |
Load Average * | 34.9 | 31.3 10% | 34.2 2% | 35.9 -3% | 44.3 -27% | 41.8 -20% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43.7 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 43.7 | 46.61 -7% | 42.9 2% | 42.2 3% | 44.3 -1% | 50.7 -16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.2 | 39.3 | 41.3 | 45.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在闲置模式下,铝制机身保持良好的散热状态,但在负载情况下,底部后部的发热尤为严重,温度几乎达到 50 °C。在这种情况下,你不应该把笔记本电脑放在大腿上,但在正常的日常使用中,你可能不会遇到任何限制。在压力测试中,处理器的功耗在几分钟后达到了 45 瓦的平衡,并稳定在这一水平。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER Work 14 Base Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -4% | 12% | 4% | 13% | 10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.7 | 45.2 -3% | 39.2 10% | 43.1 1% | 39.6 9% | 39.2 10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.4 | 49.2 -0% | 40.4 18% | 50.2 -2% | 38.6 22% | 41 17% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.7 | 29.6 -7% | 25.3 9% | 25.8 7% | 24.8 10% | 25.4 8% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.6 | 30.2 -6% | 25.8 10% | 26.4 8% | 25.3 12% | 26.8 6% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器表现出色,总体而言,红米笔记本 Pro 14 与大多数竞争对手不相上下,只有新的 MateBook 14表现更好。
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
我们在全亮度和 120 Hz 的空闲模式下测得的功耗不到 10 瓦,因此在功耗测量中没有出现意外。在负载情况下,笔记本电脑的高功率限制变得非常明显,因为在压力测试期间,测试设备短暂达到了所提供的 100 瓦电源装置的极限--略低于 102 瓦。不过,大约 20 秒钟后,其功耗稳定在 90 瓦,最后稳定在 75 瓦左右,因此总体而言,电源足够强劲。
Off / Standby | 0.47 / 0.56 Watt |
Idle | 4.4 / 9.2 / 9.6 Watt |
Load |
62.6 / 101.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
凭借 80 Wh 的电池,我们的测试设备实现了出色的运行时间,将直接竞争对手甩在了身后。在 150 cd/m²(相当于测试设备最大亮度的 67%)的 WLAN 测试中,60 Hz 下的续航时间为 14:48 小时,120 Hz 下的续航时间为 12:18 小时。在全亮度下,我们仍然记录了 11:42 小时(60 Hz)和 09:42 小时(120 Hz)。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中,我们记录了近 21 个小时。只有在负载情况下,才持续了 1:41 小时。在设备开启的情况下,充满一次电需要 94 分钟;49 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | SCHENKER Work 14 Base i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 49 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 64 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 39% | -48% | -2% | -10% | -20% | -10% | |
H.264 | 1251 | 1046 -16% | 1031 -18% | 911 ? -27% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 888 | 758 -15% | 458 -48% | 774 -13% | 710 -20% | 749 -16% | 727 ? -18% |
Load | 101 | 194 92% | 123 22% | 110 9% | 78 -23% | 115.7 ? 15% |
Pros
Cons
结论:红米本 Pro 14 物有所值
在我们的测试中,小米红米笔记本 Pro 14 给我们留下了良好的印象,因为只需约 950 美元,购买者就能获得一台快速、高品质的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,而且不会让你做出任何妥协--这部分归功于其良好的连接选项。所有重要的连接(包括 Thunderbolt 4)都已配备,而且英特尔酷睿 7 155H 提供了强大的性能。遗憾的是,后者是以笔记本电脑的排放量为代价的。在这方面,降低功耗限制更有意义,而 AMD 仍在所有能效方面处于领先地位。
该笔记本电脑的另一大优势是其出色的电池续航能力,这是竞争对手无法企及的。虽然它的 IPS 面板不如较大的 16 英寸机型,但由于它采用了哑光表面、高频率和精确的显示效果,因此不会出错。虽然 OLED 面板能更生动地显示内容,但必须考虑 PWM 闪烁和经常反光的表面。
金属外壳、大量端口、漂亮的显示屏、出色的性能、良好的键盘和超长的运行时间--小米红米笔记本 Pro 14 拥有许多良好的特性,特别是由于其低廉的价格,我们没有太多可以批评的地方。
除了风扇噪音大、负载时温度高之外,这款笔记本电脑的供货问题也是一大缺点,因为你必须购买进口设备。不过,如果这对你来说不是什么大问题,那么你就可以期待使用这款物美价廉的 14 英寸笔记本电脑了。
价格和供应情况
目前,小米红米笔记本 Pro 14 并不直接由制造商在美国销售。您可以购买进口设备,例如从 TradingShenzhen 购买,价格为US$940.51。.
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
- 07/02/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.