惠普 ProBook 445 G10 评测：办公室笔记本电脑的光与影
惠普的 ProBook 440 G10 使用的是英特尔 Raptor Lake 系列处理器，而这款 ProBook 445 G10 使用的是当前的 Ryzen 7000 型号。处理器 Ryzen 5 7530U测试设备中安装的 Ryzen 5 7530U 应该特别节能，这也是运行时间良好的原因。约 800 欧元的价格还包括 16 GB DDR4-3200 内存和 512 GB M.2 SSD。16:9 格式、1920 x 1080 像素的哑光 IPS 面板负责图像再现。预装 Windows 11 Pro 操作系统。
ProBook 的竞争对手包括其他采用 AMD 处理器的 14 英寸办公笔记本，如 联想 ThinkPad L14 G4和 戴尔 Inspiron 14 7435(也是 Ryzen 5 7530U）以及 联想 Thinkpad E14 G5和 华硕 ZenBook 14每台 Ryzen 7 7730U).
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 20 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 19.83 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 18.6 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
除了网络摄像头栏的设计和一些连接细节外，该机箱看起来与 ProBook 440 G9或 ProBook 445 G8因此，我们在本文中将只简要讨论机箱、设备（接口）和输入设备。
案例
底盘质量扎实，但并不令人振奋。与最近测试的 ZBook Firefly 14 G10相比，ZBook Firefly 14 G10 的表面质量并不高，而且似乎不够稳定。不过，在设计和做工方面没有什么可抱怨的。
这款 14 英寸笔记本仅重 1.3 千克，是测试中最轻的笔记本。2.0 厘米的高度虽然偏高，但差距很小。最重要的是，高达 180° 的开合角度值得称赞。卸下底部的五颗十字螺丝后即可打开机箱。不过，由于是店内设备，我们没有拆卸。
设备
除了三个经典的 USB A 3.0 端口外，这款 14 英寸机型还配备了一个 USB C 3.1 Gen2 端口，具有 PowerDelivery 和 DisplayPort 1.4 功能。此外，还有一个 RJ45 千兆 LAN 端口、一个 HDMI 2.1 输出端口、一个耳机或麦克风插孔和一个 Kensington Lock（肯辛顿锁）。买方不得不放弃现代 USB 4 和读卡器。最后，还有一个指纹扫描仪作为安全功能。
交流
Realtek 8852CE 芯片负责无线通信，其传输速率和接收速率都很高。
网络摄像头
虽然这款网络摄像头的效果比许多竞争对手都要好，但在色彩准确度等方面，您还是不要抱太高的期望。
配件
送货范围包括几本信息手册和一条小巧轻便的 45 瓦电源线（遗憾的是没有 USB-C）。
输入设备
键盘
与外壳类似，键盘也无法与 Firefly 14 G10 相提并论，因为键盘的键入手感要比 Firefly 14 G10 更加柔软。此外，许多买家还需要适应非传统的布局。14 英寸机型提供白色键盘照明，可在弱光环境下提供更好的可视性。
触摸板
在测试中，触摸板的表现并不突出，因此得分既不低也不高。Precision触摸板的滑动特性、点击行为和手势支持都不明显。
显示屏
虽然 ZBook Firefly 14 的显示亮度仍略低于制造商的规格，但 ProBook 445 甚至超过了惠普的承诺。我们可以确定平均亮度为 464 cd/m²，而不是 400 cd/m²，这对于 IPS 面板来说已经非常不错了。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 501 cd/m²
Contrast: 1927:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.57
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.103
| HP ProBook 445 G10 AUO2FA6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 B140HAN06.9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 LG Philips 140WU2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 M140NWHE R1, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y Samsung ATNA40YK07-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | -34% | 1% | 30% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.4 | 73.2 7% | 44.4 -35% | 69.3 1% | 99.9 46% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.2 | 98.9 4% | 64.4 -32% | 97.6 3% | 100 5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.6 | 73.9 5% | 45.8 -35% | 70.4 0% | 98.3 39% |
| Response Times | -30% | 37% | 22% | 96% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 53.4 ? | 58.1 ? -9% | 19.6 ? 63% | 36.3 ? 32% | 1.19 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.8 ? | 32.7 ? -50% | 19.3 ? 11% | 19.5 ? 11% | 1.62 ? 93% |
| PWM Frequency | 362.3 ? | ||||
| Screen | -3% | -80% | 7% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 501 | 430 -14% | 231.8 -54% | 362 -28% | 336.6 -33% |
| Brightness | 464 | 409 -12% | 216 -53% | 354 -24% | 339 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 87 0% | 91 5% | 98 13% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.31 -19% | 0.27 -4% | 0.18 31% | |
| Contrast | 1927 | 1387 -28% | 859 -55% | 2011 4% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.64 | 2.4 9% | 6.59 -150% | 2.6 2% | 0.84 68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.06 | 4.7 7% | 16.83 -233% | 3.7 27% | 3.1 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.57 | 1.4 11% | 3.94 -151% | 1.1 30% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 3 21% | 4.5 -18% | 3.3 13% | 1.4 63% |
| Gamma | 2.103 105% | 2.3 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6562 99% | 6489 100% | 6110 106% | 6761 96% | 6439 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-5% | -26% /
-53% | 10% /
8% | 49% /
37% |
* ... smaller is better
得益于 0.26 cd/m² 的低黑色值，我们获得了超过 1,900:1 的可观对比度。在这一点上，只有联想的 ThinkPad E14 可以与之抗衡。色彩空间与竞争对手一致，为 95% sRGB、71% AdobeRGB 和 68% DCI-P3。
同时，响应时间也略显不足。从黑色到白色大约需要 22 毫秒，从灰色到灰色大约需要 53 毫秒，这两项数据都非常微不足道，在测试领域是第二差的成绩。
在色彩准确度方面，几乎没有什么可抱怨的。大多数色彩在交付时已经达到了理想的范围。可视角度达到了典型的良好 IPS 水平。没有出现闪烁或明显的屏幕出血现象。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 53.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
在 CPU 性能方面，ProBook 445 G10 属于中端办公笔记本电脑。16 GB 内存应能为大多数买家提供足够的存储空间。与此同时，512 GB 的大容量存储空间在 2023 年显得有些不足。
处理器
虽然从名称上看，Ryzen 5 7530U 并非基于新的 Zen 4，而是仍然基于旧的 Zen 3 架构。这款六核机型在负载情况下主频为 2.0 至 4.5 GHz，通过 SMT 可并行处理多达 12 个线程。惠普为这款 7 纳米芯片的 TDP 选择了 25 瓦的 PL1 和 30 瓦的 PL2。
Ryzen 5 7530U 在基准测试中的表现符合预期，并保持了该处理器以往的平均水平。在所有基准测试中，性能更强的 Ryzen 7 7730U 快了约 20%。顶部：如 Cinebench 循环所示，ProBook 实现了长期稳定的性能。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (8845 - 10970, n=7) | |
| Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (57481 - 68384, n=7) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (1923 - 2323, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (68103 - 78105, n=7) | |
| Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (8277 - 9248, n=7) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (31632 - 37624, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (33314 - 92360, n=7) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (503 - 612, n=7) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (4593 - 5738, n=7) | |
| Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (9832 - 19525, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，对比设备之间的差距甚至更小，尽管 ProBook 在这方面也只能屈居末位。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (5686 - 6209, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (10016 - 11242, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8983 - 9967, n=7) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4941 - 6093, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (1029 - 1336, n=6) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (1115 - 1370, n=6) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (992 - 1390, n=6) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (900 - 1096, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5690 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (20155 - 42853, n=7) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (23068 - 40094, n=7) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (22954 - 41838, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (88.1 - 110.8, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
14 英寸处理器暴露了它的弱点，尤其是在延迟方面。LatencyMon 工具能发现实时音频和视频编辑中可能存在的问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储
在大容量存储方面可以看到一些节约措施。除了尺寸一般之外，所安装的 Kioxia SSD 的性能也只能在一定程度上令人信服。至少，即使长时间加载，速度也能保持稳定。
* ... smaller is better
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
遗憾的是，Ryzen 5 7530U 没有配备 Radeon 680M或 780M而只配备了 Radeon RX Vega 7只有 448 个着色器。更糟糕的是，后者在 ProBook 445 中的表现低于平均水平。联想 ThinkPad L14 在 3DMarks 中的表现略胜一筹，但在戴尔 Inspiron 14 7435 和华硕 ZenBook 14 及联想 ThinkPad E14 的 Vega 8 芯片面前毫无胜算。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y -1! | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 -1! | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4603 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 122347 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16606 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2358 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
图形性能只能满足较老或要求不高的游戏。在原生分辨率下很少能流畅运行高细节游戏，如果一款游戏能在中低设置下运行，你通常会感到非常高兴。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Office (3.8 - 34, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (6.5 - 15.8, n=42) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (5.09 - 15, n=34) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Office (16 - 177, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (25.5 - 105.8, n=50) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (9.74 - 81.3, n=37) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 59.1, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8.96 - 26.2, n=49) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 | |
除了 CPU 和 SSD 性能外，GPU 性能至少也相当稳定，正如我们在 60 分钟的测试中使用的 GPU。 的Witcher 3的 60 分钟测试证明了这一点。
Witcher 3 FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 58.1 | 51.5 | 13.9 | 6.49 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 42.4 | 26.6 | 12.9 | 10 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 103.7 | 76 | 37.8 | 36.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 25 | 13.3 | 8.78 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 31.6 | 25.3 | 22.6 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 49.3 | 19.4 | 16.4 | 14.3 |
排放量
噪音排放
噪音发展与同类产品一致。当笔记本无事可做或只进行简单的活动（办公、视频、网络）时，风扇要么关闭，要么以相当不错的水平旋转。在负载情况下，14 英寸笔记本的噪音也不会特别大，为 33 至 36 分贝（A），但仍保持在可接受的水平。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 28 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33 / 36 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 R7 7730U, Vega 8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 0% | -1% | -8% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 25.2 -5% | 22.8 5% | 24.4 -2% | 22.6 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 25.2 -5% | 23.2 3% | 24.4 -2% | 22.6 6% |
| Idle Average * | 25 | 25.2 -1% | 23.2 7% | 24.4 2% | 22.6 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28 | 27.3 2% | 23.2 17% | 25.7 8% | 22.6 19% |
| Load Average * | 33 | 32.1 3% | 33 -0% | 31.8 4% | 40.7 -23% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36 | 35.7 1% | 40.9 -14% | 36.7 -2% | 46.6 -29% |
| Load Maximum * | 36 | 38.3 -6% | 41.3 -15% | 41.2 -14% | 52.5 -46% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机箱底部发热最大。使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行 60 分钟的压力测试后，我们在两个测量点测得的温度约为 50 °C。机箱上部的最高温度为 43 °C，没有那么高。在空闲模式下，整个机箱的温度保持在 25 至 30 °C，非常凉爽。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-6.4 °C / -11.5 F).
| HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 R7 7730U, Vega 8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | 7% | 2% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 39 9% | 35.2 18% | 42.6 1% | 39.4 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51 | 46.3 9% | 38.2 25% | 55.3 -8% | 43.2 15% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 26.3 3% | 31.2 -16% | 25.8 4% | 28.6 -6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 37.5 -25% | 30.4 -1% | 27.4 9% | 30.6 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
即使在满负荷运行的情况下，我们也没有发现任何节流现象，CPU 的主频约为 2.6 GHz。平均温度为 80 °C，在这种极端情况下也没有理由提出批评。
发言人
HP ProBook 445 G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
功耗并不高，对于该性能级别的办公笔记本而言，空闲时的功耗为 7 至 9 瓦，负载时的功耗为 34 至 47 瓦。
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / Watt |
| Idle | 7 / 8 / 9 Watt |
| Load |
34 / 47 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 R7 7730U, Vega 8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 9% | -16% | -5% | -31% | -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 3.5 50% | 5.3 24% | 3.3 53% | 7.9 -13% | 4.5 ? 36% |
| Idle Average * | 8 | 7.2 10% | 9.1 -14% | 7.6 5% | 8.8 -10% | 7.46 ? 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9 | 7.6 16% | 9.4 -4% | 8.9 1% | 14.7 -63% | 9.09 ? -1% |
| Load Average * | 34 | 32.2 5% | 54.9 -61% | 47.3 -39% | 46.9 -38% | 42.8 ? -26% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.2 | 35.7 1% | 45 -24% | 45.1 -25% | 44.9 -24% | |
| Load Maximum * | 47 | 61.3 -30% | 55.8 -19% | 57.8 -23% | 65.2 -39% | 61.8 ? -31% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumtion Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power consumtion with external monitor
电池寿命
虽然 ProBook 445 的电池容量是测试机中最小的（只有 42 Wh，而不是 54 至 75 Wh），但运行时间却相当可观。 9.在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下，通过 WLAN 上网 5 小时，这不禁让人想起联想的 ThinkPad E14，它可以达到近 10 小时。
| HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G4 21H6S00900 R5 7530U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 R7 7730U, Vega 8, 57 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8, 75 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 43% | 18% | 5% | 28% | 8% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 568 | 814 43% | 668 18% | 594 5% | 725 28% | 612 ? 8% |
| Load | 76 | 120 | 71 | 203 | 117.8 ? | |
| Reader / Idle | 1192 | 1107 | 1300 ? | |||
| H.264 | 645 | 728 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
惠普 ProBook 445 G10 是一款中端办公笔记本电脑，售价不到 800 欧元。
尽管 Ryzen 5 7530U仍基于老式的 Zen 3 架构，但其性能（除 iGPU 外）相对于消耗而言还是令人信服的。
其他方面的表现则让人喜忧参半。该机箱的性能绝不差，但与一些竞争对手或惠普的其他机型（如 ZBook 萤火虫 14 G10相比，它应该更加稳定，品质感更强。输入设备的情况也类似。惠普还可以改进连接性（没有读卡器，没有 USB 4）和音质。
加分项主要是别致的设计、较轻的重量和明亮（尽管较弱）的显示屏。
尤其是联想的竞争对手（如ThinkPad L14 G4& ThinkPad E14 G5) 在测试中获得了更高的综合评分。ProBook 445 G10 的评分与 戴尔 Inspiron 14 7435和 华硕 ZenBook 14.
价格和供应情况
经过评测的配备 Ryzen 5 7530U 的惠普 ProBook 445 G10 可在多家在线商店购买。在美国，感兴趣的用户可以通过亚马逊订购该机型，价格约为 640 美元。
HP ProBook 445 G10
- 10/11/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
