惠普 ProBook 450 G10 评测: GeForce 办公笔记本内的 RTX 功能
在 ProBook 400 系列中,惠普将入门级到中端商务笔记本电脑捆绑在一起,不会让你花很多钱。最便宜的 15.6 英寸机型起价约为 750 美元。我们的测试设备是该系列的顶级机型,您可能需要花费约 1,000 美元。惠普为该机型配备了英特尔的 Raptor Lake CPU。不少版本还配备了 GeForce RTX 2050显卡,我们的测试设备就是其中之一。
竞争产品包括Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM,Schenker VIA 15 Pro M22,Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4,Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A 和DellLatitude 3440 - 就后两款笔记本电脑而言,这在更大程度上适用于它们各自的 15.6 英寸姐妹机型。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | HP ProBook 450 G10 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16.8 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE R7 PRO 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.9 kg | 19.93 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE R5 PRO 5675U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 3440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 19.4 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - HP 采用铝合金和塑料
从外观上看,这款笔记本与前代产品相比没有任何变化:惠普采用了银灰色、光滑、简洁的外壳(铝合金和塑料),这是从 450 G9的银灰色、圆润简洁的外壳(铝合金和塑料),表面哑光、光滑。热量通过机壳背面散发。如果盖上盖子(例如,如果笔记本电脑处于停放状态),可能会积聚一些热量。要接触电池(拧入式,非粘合式)和笔记本电脑的其他硬件,必须取下底板。
该机的构造无可挑剔。没有缝隙或多余的材料。底座和盖子的扭动幅度有点大。对于这样一款价格不菲的笔记本电脑来说,你会有更多的期待。向下按压盖子背面不会导致任何图像变化。铰链将盖子牢牢固定在最大开启角度(180 度)的位置。单手即可打开盖子。
在同类产品中,ProBook 的重量相对笔记本电脑来说比较平均(约 1.8 千克)。在尺寸方面,15.6 英寸设备都非常相似。当然,14 英寸的竞争对手要小巧轻便得多。
连接性 - ProBook 450 没有 Thunderbolt 4
ProBook 配备了两个 USB-A 连接(USB 3.2 Gen 1)和两个 USB-C 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2、Power Delivery、DisplayPort)。该笔记本电脑总共有三个视频输出接口(2 个 DP、1 个 HDMI)。一个组合音频插孔和一个千兆以太网端口完成了设置。该设备没有 SD 读卡器。
交流
在最佳条件下(附近没有 WLAN 设备,笔记本电脑和服务器电脑之间的距离很短),它能实现非常好的 WiFi 数据传输速率。450 使用 WiFi 6E 芯片(英特尔 AX211)。有线连接由 Realtek 制造的控制器(RTL8168/8111;1 GBit/s)负责。
本测试设备既没有 LTE/5G 调制解调器,也无法安装 LTE/5G 调制解调器。它也没有天线或 SIM 卡读卡器。如果您有这方面的需求,就必须选择其他型号的 ProBook。总的来说,该系列提供 WWAN 支持。
网络摄像头
惠普为适应视频会议和 Zoom 会议的持续发展趋势,配备了 500 万像素网络摄像头(最大 2560 x 1440 像素,红外线)。该摄像头不可能产生任何艺术作品:图像质量充其量只能算一般。此外:色彩偏差接近 20,与目标(DeltaE < 3)相差甚远。正面:相机有一个机械盖。
安全
这款笔记本电脑可通过指纹和 Windows Hello 实现安全访问。机上还装有可信平台模块(2.0)。该设备可使用电缆锁进行物理安全保护。在软件方面,有各种惠普专有的应用程序,如 HP Sure Run(监控应用程序是否受到攻击)和 HP Wolf Security for Business(保护终端设备免受攻击)。
配件
除了常见的文件(保修信息、快速入门海报)外,450 没有附带任何其他配件。
维护
拧下底部的五颗螺丝后(橡胶条不会隐藏任何其他螺丝),可以用刮刀或拨子弹取下底板。然后就可以访问固态硬盘(PCIe 4)、第二个固态硬盘插槽(M.2-2242 或 M.2-2230,带相应扩展)、WLAN 模块、内存储器、电池、扬声器、风扇和 BIOS 电池。
与早期的 ProBook 型号 不同,G10 键盘不能简单地更换。为此,您必须更换机箱的顶部,这就需要拆开整个笔记本电脑。
保修
在美国,ProBook 享有一年有限保修。用户可通过惠普网站延长保修期,但需支付额外费用。
输入设备 - 配有清脆键盘的惠普笔记本电脑
键盘
笔记本电脑安装的 Chiclet 键盘具有背光(两级)、数字键盘和一定的防水功能。凹面键盘的特点是键程短,按压点精确。清脆的按键阻力值得称赞。键入时键盘会有轻微的晃动,但在测试过程中并没有造成困扰。笔记本电脑的电源键位于功能键之间。意外触碰它不会导致笔记本关机。总而言之,惠普成功地提供了一款适合日常使用的键盘。
触摸板
点击垫(约 11.5 x 7 厘米)具有短抬起和清晰的压力点,可替代鼠标。
显示屏 - FHD 面板,色彩空间覆盖率低
惠普为 ProBook 配备了长宽比为 16:9 的 15.6 英寸哑光稳定视角显示屏(1920 x 1080 像素)。虽然对比度达到了目标值(> 1,000:1),但亮度还有待提高(目标值:> 300 cd/m²)。正面:我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁。另外,450 G10 还可以配备亮度更高的 FHD 面板(约 400 cd/m²)。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 285 cd/m²
Contrast: 1096:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 5.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
39.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
HP ProBook 450 G10 LG Philips LP156WFC-SPMD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 LP156WFH-SPD5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE N156HCA-E5B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE LP140WFH-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 3440 BOE NE140FH, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | 73% | 9% | -2% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.4 | 38.11 -1% | 67.5 76% | 41.8 9% | 37.5 -2% | 40.4 5% |
sRGB Coverage | 57.3 | 57.7 1% | 97.1 69% | 62.5 9% | 56.1 -2% | 60.7 6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.7 | 39.41 -1% | 68.5 73% | 43.2 9% | 38.8 -2% | 41.8 5% |
Response Times | -2% | 59% | 23% | -5% | -15% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.5 ? | 33.6 ? 5% | 13.8 ? 61% | 24.4 ? 31% | 35 ? 1% | 35.3 ? 1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 24.8 ? -8% | 9.8 ? 57% | 19.7 ? 14% | 25.6 ? -11% | 29.8 ? -30% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | |||||
Screen | -5% | 21% | 11% | -17% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 285 | 257.4 -10% | 354 24% | 275 -4% | 231 -19% | 292.6 3% |
Brightness | 266 | 248 -7% | 331 24% | 252 -5% | 228 -14% | 270 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 80 -9% | 84 -5% | 77 -12% | 88 0% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.3209 -23% | 0.41 -58% | 0.16 38% | 0.31 -19% | 0.19 27% |
Contrast | 1096 | 802 -27% | 863 -21% | 1719 57% | 745 -32% | 1540 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 6.26 1% | 2.4 62% | 6.2 2% | 7.2 -14% | 4.63 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.3 | 18.28 -0% | 6.4 65% | 19.2 -5% | 20.8 -14% | 17.1 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.2 | 4.99 4% | 1.4 73% | 4.2 19% | 5.5 -6% | 2.13 59% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 3.7 14% | 3.2 26% | 4.1 5% | 5.3 -23% | 3.2 26% |
Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.186 101% | 2.08 106% | 1.91 115% | 2.16 102% | 2.34 94% |
CCT | 6374 102% | 6606 98% | 6786 96% | 6352 102% | 6407 101% | 7184 90% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-4% | 51% /
37% | 14% /
12% | -8% /
-12% | 4% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Ex 工作时,屏幕显示的色彩描绘可以接受:偏差约为 6.3,遗憾的是没有达到目标值(DeltaE < 3)。校准后,该值降至 5.2,使灰阶看起来更加平衡。该面板无法显示 DCI-P3、sRGB 和 AdobeRGB 色彩空间--大多数竞争对手的屏幕也是如此。另一款更亮的 FHD 面板则能提供更好的色彩描绘(sRGB)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.6 ms rise | |
↘ 16.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
视角稳定的 IPS 面板在任何角度都清晰易读。在室外,只要阳光不是太强烈,就可以阅读显示屏上的内容。
性能 - Raptor Lake 和 Ampere 为惠普笔记本电脑提供动力
在 ProBook 400 G10 系列中,惠普采用了 AMD 的 APU(ProBook 455)和英特尔的 CPU(ProBook 450)。在测试期间,450 G10 型号的售价在 750 美元到 1,100 美元之间。目前的型号售价约为 1,000 美元。
测试条件
惠普没有使用自己的能源配置文件,而是使用了 Windows 的配置文件,称为 "电源状态"(见表)。我们使用了 "最佳性能 "配置文件(基准测试、负载运行测试)和 "均衡 "配置文件(其他运行测试)。
由于三个配置文件的功耗限制相同,CPU 性能几乎没有差别。而 GPU 性能则因配置文件而异。
最佳性能 | 平衡 | 最佳省电 | |
---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 24 瓦 | 24 瓦 | 24 瓦 |
功率极限 2 (HWInfo) | 55 瓦 | 55 瓦 | 55 瓦 |
处理器
酷睿 i7-1355U 酷睿 i7-1355U的 10 个 CPU 内核(2P、8E)的最高时钟频率分别为 5 GHz(P)和 3.7 GHz(E)。永久多线程负载(CB15 循环)导致时钟频率从第一次运行到第二次运行时略有下降。之后,时钟速率保持不变。
Aspire 配备了相同的 CPU,其基准测试结果优于 ProBook,这是因为 ProBook 的功率极限 1 较高(28 瓦比 24 瓦)。后者提供了所安装 CPU 的平均结果(连接电源时)。在电池使用情况下,ProBook 的单线程性能(162 分;CB15)低于多线程性能(673 分;CB15)。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Average of class Office | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5673 - 8424, n=18) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (29580 - 42706, n=18) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=92, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1529 - 2200, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21547 - 66907, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (4045 - 5426, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (14596 - 21627, n=18) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (31432 - 75408, n=18) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (454 - 684, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2991 - 4453, n=18) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21800 - 46154, n=18) | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=92, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE |
系统性能
该系统运行流畅,可满足办公和互联网使用、GPU 密集型程序以及中等要求的游戏。与前代产品一样,惠普为这款笔记本电脑配备了 DDR4-3200 内存。如果采用更先进的 DDR5,CPU 的性能可能会更高一些。内存的数据传输速率对于 DDR4-3200 内存来说是正常的。PC Mark 测试结果良好。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (6235 - 6540, n=3) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (10174 - 20841, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (8449 - 8841, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=85, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (7278 - 7967, n=3) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=85, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (1629 - 1794, n=3) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (1635 - 1870, n=3) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (1655 - 1766, n=3) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (1504 - 2017, n=3) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE |
PCMark 10 Score | 6235 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35017 - 71600, n=18) | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=93, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (38551 - 73377, n=18) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=93, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35910 - 93342, n=18) | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=93, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (72.2 - 346, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
标准延迟监控测试(网上冲浪、4K 视频播放、Prime95 高负载)发现了一些异常情况。该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进甚至恶化。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
该设备的 PCIe 4 固态硬盘(M.2-2280)来自美光,容量为 1 TB,在我们的测试中提供了出色的数据传输速率。遗憾的是:测试了一小会儿后,我们发现了一些热节流现象。笔记本电脑有空间安装第二个 PCIe SSD(只能安装 M.2-2242 或 M.2-2230,并配有相应的固定板)。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在 Nvidia 当前的 RTX GPU 系列中,RTX 2050 GeForce RTX 2050是最弱的型号。该 GPU 提供 2,048 个着色器、64 位宽总线、快速 GDDR6 内存(4,096 MB)、光线追踪和 DLSS。惠普为其设定的 TGP 值为 30 瓦--该值处于可能达到的较低水平。不出所料,其基准测试结果低于之前 RTX-2050 的平均水平。
GPU 可以在短时间内以全功率工作,但从长远来看,其时钟频率会下降。其程度取决于所选的能源配置文件,但与预期相反:"最佳性能 "的影响最大,而 "最佳省电 "导致的下降最小。测试日志数据 Witcher 3测试日志数据非常清楚地显示了这些差异(下图)。Time Spy 压力测试进一步证明了这种行为。
请注意:我们不能排除测试设备出错的可能性。如果这是一个普遍问题,惠普可能会在未来的 BIOS 更新中加以解决。
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 38036 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 10898 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25686 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7230 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3129 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
ProBook 并不能被归类为游戏笔记本电脑,不过,由于配备了GeForce GPU,它可以运行不少游戏。您应该使用 "最佳省电 "能源配置文件。只有这样,图形处理器才能以相对稳定的高时钟频率运行。
硬件允许使用从低到高的设置进行全高清游戏。目前的游戏通常需要降低设置。要达到足够高的帧率,您应该更保守地选择设置。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (24.3 - 39.6, n=9) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Office (3.8 - 34, n=73, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (35.6 - 55.8, n=10) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
为了测试帧频是否能在较长时间内保持稳定,我们在全高清分辨率和最高画质设置下让游戏TheWitcher 3运行了约 60 分钟。我们没有移动角色。最佳性能 "配置文件导致帧率波动,而 "最佳省电 "配置文件使帧率更符合我们的预期。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 156.4 | 153.1 | 74 | 35.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 142.1 | 84.2 | 46.7 | 24.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 149.1 | 123.5 | 108.2 | 98.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 68.1 | 32.3 | 24.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 91 | 80.9 | 69.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 93 | 39 | 35 | 34 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 143.1 | 66.5 | 53.7 | 46.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 32.2 | 23.5 | 19.1 | 16.8 |
F1 23 (2023) | 54.8 | 50.8 | 36.9 | 11.3 |
排放 - HP G10 不会产生太多噪音和热量
噪音排放
风扇在日常使用中基本保持安静,经常完全静止不动。在中满载情况下,风扇的声音会变大:在我们的测试中,声压级达到了 41.4 dB(A)。总之,对于配备专用 GPU 的办公笔记本电脑来说,这种背景噪音是完全可以接受的。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 23.5 / 23.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38 / 41.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A) |
HP ProBook 450 G10 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 Vega 8, R7 5700U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE Vega 8, R7 PRO 7730U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X113N | Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE Vega 7, R5 PRO 5675U, WDC PC SN530 SDBQNPZ-512G | Dell Latitude 3440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -0% | 9% | -0% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 23.5 | 25.04 -7% | 24 -2% | 23.5 -0% | 23.6 -0% | 23.9 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 26.3 -12% | 24 -2% | 23.5 -0% | 23.6 -0% | 24.4 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23.5 | 26.3 -12% | 24 -2% | 23.5 -0% | 23.6 -0% | 24.4 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.5 | 26.3 -12% | 27.5 -17% | 23.5 -0% | 28.7 -22% | 24.4 -4% |
Load Average * | 38 | 32.5 14% | 33.7 11% | 27.5 28% | 36.3 4% | 37.1 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.2 | 46.7 -22% | 33.7 12% | 32.7 14% | 36.3 5% | 38.2 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 41.4 | 49 -18% | 42.4 -2% | 32.7 21% | 36.3 12% | 40.2 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下(压力测试),笔记本电脑的温度并不高、 Witcher 3测试)。在日常使用中(办公、上网),数值保持在绿色区域内。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.1 °C / 84.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
HP ProBook 450 G10 Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Dell Latitude 3440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 6% | -2% | 10% | -14% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.9 | 35.7 11% | 41.2 -3% | 39.1 2% | 49.5 -24% | 35.2 12% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43 | 36.8 14% | 43.5 -1% | 36.1 16% | 50.3 -17% | 41 5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.4 | 27.9 -6% | 28.4 -8% | 23.1 12% | 29.6 -12% | 29.8 -13% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 27.9 4% | 28.1 3% | 25.7 11% | 30 -3% | 32 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
压力测试(连续使用 Prime95 和 Furmark)模拟极端情况,以测试系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。开始测试时,CPU(P:2.5 GHz,E:1.9 GHz)和 GPU(832 MHz)的时钟频率相对较低。
发言人
立体声扬声器能发出不错的声音,但几乎没有低音。我们建议使用耳机或外置扬声器来获得更愉悦的声音体验。
HP ProBook 450 G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - HP 电脑的运行时间很长
耗电量
在负载情况下,ProBook 比 Aspire 5 节能得多。 Aspire 5的能耗要小得多。这并不奇怪:说到底,惠普笔记本电脑的硬件运行性能设置要保守得多。因此,450 G10 可以使用 65 瓦的电源(Aspire:90 瓦)。虽然 Witcher 3测试过程中,它的功耗值时高时低,先是缓慢下降,然后从某一点开始急剧下降。
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 4.6 / 7.3 / 8.4 Watt |
Load |
57.3 / 69.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP ProBook 450 G10 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 R7 5700U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE R7 PRO 7730U, Vega 8, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X113N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE R5 PRO 5675U, Vega 7, WDC PC SN530 SDBQNPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 3440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -10% | -21% | 7% | 17% | 9% | -23% | 7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.6 | 4.31 6% | 6.9 -50% | 4.5 2% | 4.1 11% | 3.7 20% | 5.11 ? -11% | 4.47 ? 3% |
Idle Average * | 7.3 | 6.52 11% | 10.9 -49% | 8.5 -16% | 6.6 10% | 6.5 11% | 9.15 ? -25% | 7.42 ? -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.4 | 8.037 4% | 11.3 -35% | 10.5 -25% | 7.4 12% | 9.5 -13% | 11.2 ? -33% | 8.9 ? -6% |
Load Average * | 57.3 | 75.2 -31% | 54.2 5% | 35.6 38% | 43.1 25% | 46.9 18% | 70.6 ? -23% | 42.1 ? 27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.3 | 60.8 -23% | 47.3 4% | 37.4 24% | 42.6 14% | 42.1 15% | ||
Load Maximum * | 69.7 | 89.5 -28% | 69 1% | 57.9 17% | 50.9 27% | 67 4% | 87.4 ? -25% | 61.8 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
根据数据表,惠普为 ProBook 提供了两种电池选择(42 Wh、51 Wh)--我们的测试设备采用的是较大的型号。因此,这款 15.6 英寸设备的实际运行时间为 9:19 小时(WiFi;通过脚本访问网站)和 11:25 小时(视频;短片 Big Buck Bunny(H.264 编码,FHD))--数值不错。
HP ProBook 450 G10 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 51.3 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48 Wh | SCHENKER VIA 15 Pro M22 R7 5700U, Vega 8, 91 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE R7 PRO 7730U, Vega 8, 57 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook E5412A E542AMHAAMDE R5 PRO 5675U, Vega 7, 60 Wh | Dell Latitude 3440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -27% | 18% | 7% | -25% | -6% | -1% | |
Reader / Idle | 1083 | 1504 39% | 1234 ? 14% | ||||
H.264 | 685 | 397 -42% | 569 -17% | 493 -28% | 716 ? 5% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 559 | 522 -7% | 660 18% | 716 28% | 623 11% | 528 -6% | 611 ? 9% |
Load | 170 | 118 -31% | 133 -22% | 70 -59% | 116.7 ? -31% |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 可用于休闲游戏的办公笔记本电脑
办公和互联网应用可通过安装由 酷睿 i7-1355U和 32 GB 内存(双通道)的组合。游戏等 GPU 密集型应用则得益于 GeForce RTX 2050.不过:GPU 可以全功率吸收短时间的负载峰值,但在长时间负载情况下,速度会稍慢一些。
没有实验。与前代产品类似,惠普 ProBook 450 G10 显示出自己是一款面向组织、公司和私人用户的可靠办公笔记本电脑。
该设备的发热和噪音排放都还不错。适中的重量(约 1.8 千克)、小巧的机身和实用的运行时间(9 至 11 小时)确保了其便携性。两个 USB-C 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2)可轻松集成到现有的工作场所设置中。
电源通过惠普专有电源提供。另外,您也可以使用 USB-C 充电器,这两个 USB-C 端口都支持 Power Delivery(并能输出 DisplayPort 信号)。遗憾的是,它们 "只是 "USB 3.2 Gen 2 端口。在惠普的 ProBook 上找不到 Thunderbolt 4。另一个优点是键盘清脆。
安装的 FHD 显示屏(IPS,15.6 英寸)只能提供有限的色彩空间,亮度也达不到目标值(大于 300 cd/m²)。对于许多用户来说,配备 400 尼特面板(FHD)(包括 sRGB 覆盖范围)的 ProBook 型号可能是更好的解决方案。
这款笔记本电脑的价格还算公道。不带GeForce GPU 的机型价格已经远远低于 1000 美元,而同样配置的ProBook 455 G10 系列(Ryzen 7000)也是如此。.
450 G10 的替代产品可以是 宏碁 Aspire 5 A515-58GM.它采用相同的 CPU/GPU 组合,性能略高,还配备了 Thunderbolt 4 端口。Aspire 在峰值时产生的噪音略大于惠普笔记本电脑,而且在负载情况下,它的功耗要求更高。您需要花费大约 1000 美元购买宏碁设备。
价格和供应情况
我们测试的惠普 ProBook 450 G10 目前在亚马逊上的售价为969 美元。
HP ProBook 450 G10
- 12/13/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.