宏碁 Aspire 5 A515-58GM 评测:配备仿游戏 GPU 的办公笔记本电脑
Aspire 5 系列是宏碁推出的一系列经济型笔记本电脑。由于该机型安装了 RTX 显卡,我们需要测试一下其预算概念是否仍然成立。其最高售价约为 1,200 美元,配备了GeForce RTX 2050确实需要给我们留下深刻印象。这款 15.6 英寸笔记本电脑还配备了 Raptor Lake CPU (酷睿 i7-1355U)、60-Hz 全高清显示屏(45% NTSC)、16 GB DDR4 内存和 1-TB SSD。
从外观上看,Aspire 5 AN515-58GM 并无太大变化,而它的前身 前代产品配备了相同的 Nvidia GPU。但仍有 AMD 版本其优缺点我们也将在本次评测中进行剖析。笔记本Aspire 3 系列甚至比 Aspire 5(不含 dGPU)更便宜,而环保的Aspire Vero刚刚发布。
这款笔记本电脑并没有面临太多的直接竞争对手,因为制造商通常会选择性能更弱、更省钱的GeForce MX 显卡 或决定采用性能强大的RTX 3050 或RTX 4050 - 但与此同时,集成 GPU 解决方案也能提供足够的多媒体功能,例如华硕VivoBook S15 中的Radeon 680M 。
经济型游戏笔记本电脑,如联想的 LOQ 15 和华硕的TUF Gaming A15 ,虽然体积更大,但图形处理性能更高,在上述价格范围内触手可及。典型的竞争对手包括联想的IdeaPad 5 15 和戴尔的Inspiron 15 等纯中档办公笔记本电脑。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8 | 1.9 kg | 18.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 25.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.7 kg | 19.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M | 1.9 kg | 18.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳:坚固的 Aspire 5,配有金属盖和人体工学升降装置
宏碁的 Aspire 5(2023)采用了相当坚固的塑料外壳,铝制拉丝外观,而盖子实际上是由金属制成的。它只能被轻微地扭动,当你施加有针对性的压力时,它也不会有太大的反应。
它的 前代产品的颜色更深,呈铁灰色,而Aspire 3作为入门机型则完全由塑料制成。联想IdeaPad 5、戴尔Inspiron 16、华为MateBook D 15以及惠普的Envy 系列都是完全由金属制成,边框很薄。
总的来说,这款笔记本电脑给人的印象还不错--表面手感很好,指纹痕迹不太明显,但宽边框给人的感觉有点过时。当你大开笔记本电脑(最大 135°)时,它的 ergo-lift 功能就会派上用场,它能带来舒适的打字姿势和更有效的散热。铰链很紧,但单手仍可打开笔记本电脑。
它的尺寸和重量与 15.6 英寸笔记本电脑相当,重 1.8 千克,厚度约 20 毫米。联想联想 LOQ 15和华硕 TUF GAMING A15游戏笔记本的重量分别为 2.2 千克/2.5 千克,厚度约为 25 毫米。这样它们才能冷却较高的温度。华为MateBook D 15 AMD是我们对比设备中最轻的一款,重 1.61 千克。
连接性雷电 4、GBit-RJ45 和 HDMI 2.1
很高兴看到这款笔记本电脑配备了 Thunderbolt 4 端口,包括 DisplayPort 1.4 和 Power Delivery,这在办公笔记本电脑上并不常见。只有TUF Gaming A15和Aspire 5采用了这一 USB-4 标准。目前的IdeaPad Pro 5 16和Inspiron 16(英特尔)也采用了这一标准。
其 HDMI 2.1 端口支持 8K,但只能支持 30 Hz 或 60 Hz 的 4K。每侧有一个 USB-A 3.2 Gen1(5 GBit/s),而其前代产品有三个 USB-A 端口。右侧为:GBit-RJ45、Kensington 锁和 3.5 毫米音频插孔。
交流
安装的英特尔 AX211 无线局域网模块可在 6 GHz 频率下充分发挥潜力,接收速度超过 1.6 Gbit/s。
IdeaPad 5 15 和MateBook D 15 AMD 内的 Realtek 芯片要慢得多。它支持蓝牙 5.1,但没有任何 LTE 选项。
网络摄像头
不出所料,它的 1080p 网络摄像头虽然不能提供出色的照片,但比大多数竞争对手要好得多。它支持 Windows Hello,并配备了体面的双阵列麦克风,但没有镜头盖。实用的功能包括自动取景、高级背景模糊和眼睛校正。
交付范围
除了一个小巧的 90 瓦电源外,这款笔记本电脑没有配备任何其他配件。宏碁网站也没有提供任何专用配件。令人欣慰的是,该产品的包装非常环保,没有采用塑料包装,而是采用了可回收的纸板和纸浆。另一方面,预装的大量臃肿软件令人烦恼。
维护
卸下 10 颗十字螺丝后,只需使用塑料卡或铲刀工具即可取下盖子。里面有两个内存组、两个 M.2 2280 插槽、可交换的 WLAN 模块以及拧紧的电池。如果需要对散热系统进行维护,也可以很方便地将其拆开。
保修
宏碁在美国为 Aspire 5 提供一年有限保修。您可以在Acer 网站上找到延长保修期的选项。.
输入设备:舒适的 Acer 键盘 - 在光线充足的条件下
键盘
在宏碁 Aspire 5 上打字感觉非常舒适,尽管IdeaPad 5的压力点稍好一些,但提升幅度较小(1.3 毫米比 1.4 毫米)。键盘的中间部分只要有足够的压力就能按到,但在打字时似乎不成问题。浅灰色标签与中灰色按键之间的对比度似乎是个大问题,尤其是在环境光线较强的情况下(见下面的图片对比)。
键盘布局良好,除了垂直方向键减半、数字键区缩小和常见的双分配键之外。键盘的背光只有一个亮度级别。如果你经常打字,那么你可能会更喜欢Lenovo LOQ 15 Gaming 笔记本电脑,它有 1.5 毫米的提升和更好的布局--惠普的Envy 系列 也有不错的键盘。
触摸板
它的触摸板也比的前代产品更好用:它不再发出嘎吱嘎吱的响声,集成的按键不松软,有足够的提升力,表面也很光滑--尽管它的精度不是最好的。
显示屏15.6 英寸办公笔记本电脑喜欢在黑暗中工作
这款笔记本电脑配备了标准的 15.6 英寸 IPS 显示屏,分辨率为 1,920 x 1,080 像素(16:9)。它最大的缺陷是色彩空间覆盖率较低,仅为 58% sRGB,亮度也很低,仅为 248 cd/m²。在电池使用状态下,亮度甚至降至 220 cd/m²。
对于一款经济型笔记本电脑来说,这不失为一个合理的折衷方案,但在售价近 1200 美元的情况下,你甚至无法选择一款更鲜艳、更明亮的替代品。即便如此,在最高 60 Hz 的情况下,你也能体验到略显乏味的游戏体验。
此外,由于采用了磨砂表面,画质更加暗淡,而上一代产品的对比度 前代产品的对比度要高得多:1317:1 对比 802:1。至少,我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁或背光出血现象。
相比之下,真正的游戏笔记本电脑,如联想LOQ 15、LOQ 16 和华硕TUF GAMING A15提供 144 Hz 的基本配置,并可选择升级到 100 % sRGB。在纯办公笔记本电脑方面,IdeaPad Pro 5 16 脱颖而出,因为它是一款价格相对便宜的设备,配备 120 Hz QHD 显示屏。华硕VivoBook S15采用 OLED 面板,可覆盖约 99 % 的 AdobeRGB 显示屏,是我们对比的产品中显示效果最好的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 220 cd/m²
Contrast: 802:1 (Black: 0.3209 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.99
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
39.41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.11% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.186
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 LP156WFH-SPD5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 CMN N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Samsung SDC4161, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F BOE NV15N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx BOE08A8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U B156HAN02.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 BOE NJ NE156FHM-NX3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 14% | -1% | 128% | -5% | 3% | 11% | 5% | 69% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.11 | 43.3 14% | 99.9 162% | 36.58 -4% | 39.6 4% | 42.3 11% | 40.2 5% | 64.9 70% | |
sRGB Coverage | 57.7 | 65 13% | 59 2% | 100 73% | 54.37 -6% | 58.5 1% | 63.4 10% | 60.2 4% | 96.5 67% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.41 | 44.8 14% | 38 -4% | 98.6 150% | 37.79 -4% | 40.9 4% | 43.7 11% | 41.5 5% | 66.6 69% |
Response Times | -3% | 21% | 95% | -28% | -16% | -46% | -13% | 13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.6 ? | 35.6 ? -6% | 29 ? 14% | 0.74 98% | 44 ? -31% | 43.6 ? -30% | 51.2 ? -52% | 42.7 ? -27% | 30.4 ? 10% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 24.5 ? 1% | 18 ? 27% | 2 ? 92% | 31 ? -25% | 25.2 ? -2% | 34.4 ? -39% | 24.5 ? 1% | 20.8 ? 16% |
PWM Frequency | 59 ? | 1250 ? | |||||||
Screen | 19% | -13% | 51% | 18% | 13% | 18% | 25% | 49% | |
Brightness middle | 257.4 | 250 -3% | 376 46% | 378 47% | 251 -2% | 297.8 16% | 299 16% | 346.2 34% | 288 12% |
Brightness | 248 | 234 -6% | 341 38% | 378 52% | 241 -3% | 271 9% | 280 13% | 329 33% | 271 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 79 -10% | 78 -11% | 98 11% | 87 -1% | 81 -8% | 89 1% | 81 -8% | 91 3% |
Black Level * | 0.3209 | 0.19 41% | 0.66 -106% | 0.23 28% | 0.35 -9% | 0.2 38% | 0.31 3% | 0.17 47% | |
Contrast | 802 | 1316 64% | 570 -29% | 1091 36% | 851 6% | 1495 86% | 1117 39% | 1694 111% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.26 | 3.94 37% | 6.4 -2% | 2.2 65% | 5.14 18% | 5.16 18% | 5.2 17% | 4.19 33% | 1.9 70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.28 | 16.73 8% | 20.45 -12% | 4.87 73% | 18.41 -1% | 19.76 -8% | 20.8 -14% | 19.19 -5% | 3.3 82% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.99 | 3.09 38% | 2.68 46% | 2.28 54% | 4.2 16% | 1.66 67% | 0.9 82% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 3.6 3% | 4.59 -24% | 1.43 61% | 1.08 71% | 2.2 41% | 4.1 -11% | 2.6 30% | 2.7 27% |
Gamma | 2.186 101% | 2.081 106% | 2.26 97% | 2.47 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.32 95% |
CCT | 6606 98% | 6476 100% | 6819 95% | 6464 101% | 6534 99% | 6678 97% | 6548 99% | 6749 96% | 6535 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 37.79 | |||||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 54.37 | |||||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
15% | 2% /
-5% | 91% /
78% | -5% /
6% | 0% /
7% | -6% /
7% | 6% /
15% | 44% /
48% |
* ... smaller is better
由于只覆盖了 57.7% 的 sRGB 色彩空间,这款笔记本电脑无法用于专业的图像和视频编辑,因为这需要准确的色彩描绘。
色彩和灰度明显超出了 DeltaE 3 的极限,人眼能检测到的色彩偏差已达此极限。我们的校准无法改善色彩值。我们至少可以消除轻微的青色色调。我们的校准色彩配置文件可在此处下载 这里.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.2 ms rise | |
↘ 10.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.8 ms rise | |
↘ 17.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在电池模式下,它的亮度非常低,只有 220 cd/m²,即使在完全遮光的情况下,也几乎无法在室外阅读显示屏上的内容。
性能:Aspire 5 的 CPU 和 GPU 仍处于最低水平
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM 配备了英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U(2 个 P 核心 + 8 个 E 核心)、16 GB 可扩展 DDR4 内存、1 TB SSD(PCIe 3.0)和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050最低 TGP 为 35 瓦。更便宜的 SKU 则配备 NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050但不带 dGPU。AMD 也有配备 RX Vega 显卡的机型,但它们配备的是完全焊接的内存。与 几乎完全相同的前代机型可以配备MX550或 RTX 2050。
Aspire 是一款全能型产品,从办公到多媒体使用,一直到玩新游戏(在低细节设置下)。对于 4K 视频编辑来说,这个版本的速度一般来说已经足够快了,不过我们还是建议连接一个外接显示器。
测试条件
制造商为 Aspire 5 提供了三种不同的性能模式,可通过宏碁快速访问或组合键 "Fn+F "进行选择。我们使用 "性能 "模式进行了性能基准测试,而电池测试则选择了普通模式。
下面的列表和图表显示了 CPU 性能限制方面的差异,而 GPU 性能始终保持不变:
- 性能:55 瓦 (PL2) > 28 瓦 (PL1),15 秒后。
- 正常:在 10 至 55 瓦之间波动,约 25 秒后平衡在 28 瓦(PL1)。
- 静音:波动较强,2 秒钟内为 50 瓦,然后以 20 秒为间隔在 15 至 28 瓦之间持续波动,风扇也是如此。
- 电池:30 秒后,19 瓦 (PL2) > 15 瓦 (PL1)。
处理器
所安装的英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U 处理器(2 个 P 核心 + 8 个 E 核心)非常耗电,这在我们的 Cinebench R15 循环中得到了很好的体现:
在第一次运行时,CPU 仍能使用 55 瓦的功率,但从第二次运行开始,性能已大幅下降。这导致它在第三轮运行后仅获得了 930 分,而不是最初的 1624 分。英特尔并不是造成这种情况的唯一原因,因为通常情况下,带有两个风扇的强大冷却系统应允许 CPU 长期消耗 40 瓦或更多的功率。28 瓦的节流设置相当保守,因为在我们的连续循环中,核心温度最高仅升至 73 °C。
因此,配备英特尔酷睿 i7-1260P 的前代产品在连续多核负载下的速度快了约 40%--当然,情况不应该是这样。不过,我们的性能评级结果也显示,在完成耗时不长的任务时,两款笔记本电脑的表现相差无几。
最后,只有华硕VivoBook S15 (配备 AMDRyzen 7 6800H 以及两款游戏笔记本电脑:华硕TUF Gaming A15 和联想LOQ 15 ,它们都采用了AMD HS CPU (35 瓦 TDP)。就纯粹的单核性能而言,Aspire 5 实际上在大部分情况下都名列前茅。
在电池模式下,CPU 只能使用 15 瓦 (PL1) 和 19 瓦 (PL2),这意味着它的成绩下降到 1,077 分。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (6936 - 10252, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1687 - 1889, n=18) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2849 - 3907, n=18) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (654 - 725, n=18) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1206 - 1735, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (237 - 267, n=18) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (328 - 503, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5301 - 5911, n=18) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7507 - 9328, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1678 - 1872, n=18) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7.83 - 11.4, n=18) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (41.1 - 108.6, n=18) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (0.4481 - 0.832, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average of class Office | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5673 - 8424, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (29580 - 42706, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1529 - 2200, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21547 - 66907, n=18) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (4045 - 5426, n=18) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (14596 - 21627, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (31432 - 75408, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (454 - 684, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2991 - 4453, n=18) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21800 - 46154, n=18) | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
系统性能
在日常使用中,宏碁笔记本电脑反应灵敏,速度超快。尤其是它的单核性能和短期涡轮增压(最高 55 瓦)更是锦上添花。
因此,在 PCMark 10 基准测试中,只有两款游戏笔记本电脑和华硕VivoBook S15 的性能高于 Aspire 5,而在 WebXPRT 4 等浏览基准测试中往往能取得最佳成绩。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Octane V2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=89, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Office (26.1 - 408, n=38, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Office (74.4 - 316, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
Octane V2 / Total Score | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Office (22414 - 93596, n=40, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=89, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6540 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35910 - 93342, n=18) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (72.2 - 346, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
高 DPC 延迟阻碍了实时多媒体软件的使用。通常情况下,内核模块驱动程序是主要原因。BIOS 更新会改善或进一步恶化结果。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
宏碁笔记本电脑安装的 1 TB M.2 2280 SSD(美光 2450)给人留下了很好的印象:与 PCIe 3.0 标准的平均值相比,它的连续读取传输速率略高于平均值,高达 3,161 MB/s。其超过 3 GB/s 的写入速度也比我们对比领域的任何竞争对手都要快得多。此外,其 4K 值也相当不错。
虽然该笔记本电脑的直接前身 依赖于相同的固态硬盘型号,但当前型号的基准测试结果在许多方面都要高得多--即使是在我们的 DiskSpd 基准测试循环结束时,最新的 Aspire 5 中的固态硬盘还出现了周期性的热节流。
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -39% | -57% | -53% | -94% | -100% | |
Seq Read | 3161.58 | 3123.89 -1% | 2549 -19% | 2831 -10% | 1276 -60% | 2460.42 -22% |
Seq Write | 3133.52 | 3008.29 -4% | 1571 -50% | 1092 -65% | 548.03 -83% | 721.73 -77% |
4K Read | 91.08 | 89.47 -2% | 41.92 -54% | 35.43 -61% | 33.31 -63% | 38.16 -58% |
4K Write | 350.26 | 277.46 -21% | 110.3 -69% | 115.95 -67% | 70.44 -80% | 203.12 -42% |
4K-64 Read | 2277.61 | 1360.83 -40% | 1086 -52% | 817 -64% | 662.17 -71% | 597.83 -74% |
4K-64 Write | 2157.55 | 1446.04 -33% | 1083 -50% | 1522 -29% | 608.11 -72% | 788.8 -63% |
Access Time Read * | 0.031 | 0.106 -242% | 0.119 -284% | 0.083 -168% | 0.169 -445% | 0.083 -168% |
Access Time Write * | 0.175 | 0.168 4% | 0.034 81% | 0.132 25% | 0.219 -25% | 1.028 -487% |
Score Read | 2685 | 1763 -34% | 1383 -48% | 1136 -58% | 823 -69% | 882 -67% |
Score Write | 2821 | 2024 -28% | 1351 -52% | 1747 -38% | 733 -74% | 1064 -62% |
Score Total | 6893 | 4707 -32% | 3398 -51% | 3381 -51% | 1948 -72% | 2319 -66% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 3028.09 | 1286 -58% | 662.31 -78% | 993.21 -67% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 1028.01 | 574 -44% | 448.05 -56% | 434.34 -58% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 2150.78 | 1133 -47% | 560.84 -74% | 342.01 -84% | ||
DiskSpd | -70% | -46% | -37% | -58% | -45% | |
seq read | 2253 | 756 -66% | 1684 -25% | 2220 -1% | 1536 -32% | 1773 -21% |
seq write | 3392 | 830 -76% | 1498 -56% | 1923 -43% | 1331 -61% | 2177 -36% |
seq q8 t1 read | 3538 | 1023 -71% | 2659 -25% | 3595 2% | 2181 -38% | 2594 -27% |
seq q8 t1 write | 3410 | 934 -73% | 1603 -53% | 1956 -43% | 1409 -59% | 2404 -30% |
4k q1 t1 read | 70.3 | 18.6 -74% | 46 -35% | 47 -33% | 37.9 -46% | 42.6 -39% |
4k q1 t1 write | 429 | 221 -48% | 128 -70% | 174.7 -59% | 94.5 -78% | 166.4 -61% |
4k q32 t16 read | 1846 | 416 -77% | 1068 -42% | 1282 -31% | 701 -62% | 705 -62% |
4k q32 t16 write | 3254 | 923 -72% | 1174 -64% | 407 -87% | 306 -91% | 414 -87% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -55% /
-52% | -52% /
-53% | -45% /
-46% | -76% /
-81% | -73% /
-80% |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
宏碁为 Aspire 5 A515-58GM 配备了 NvidiaRTX 2050 移动配备了 4GB GDDR6 VRAM,与RTX 3050 Mobile则被限制在 64 位。大体相似的MX570只有 2 GB VRAM。同样有趣的是,宏碁将 TGP 的功率限制在 35 瓦(而制造商称其为 30 瓦,这只是指电池使用)。
这一决定导致 RTX 2050 的速度比ThinkBook 16 G4+慢了 20%,几乎无法与GTX 1650.
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 40490 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 40973 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11734 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 115772 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25879 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7746 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3363 points | |
Help |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA |
Geekbench 6.0 | |
GPU Vulkan 6.0 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
GPU OpenCL 6.0 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
之间的差距RTX 3050和RTX 2050之间的差距为 50%。虽然,RTX 3050 的 40 瓦运行速度在 宏碁的 Swift X SFX16.相比之下,GeForce MX550和MX570(2 GB VRAM)在相同的 TGP 下速度稍慢,因此不依赖 MX GPU 的决定是可以理解的,许多其他全能型笔记本电脑也是这样做的。
不过,鉴于 Aspire 5 的高昂附加费用,RTX 3050 Ti 是一个不错的选择。RTX 3050 Ti甚至RTX 4050包括更高的 TGP 会更有意义,而集成了Radeon 680M或780M当然更具吸引力。这种 GPU 解决方案的速度会慢 38%,但仍能以更高的性价比提供足够的多媒体性能。
总的来说,RTX 2050 可以在中等细节水平和原生 FHD 分辨率下流畅渲染较新的游戏。不过,对于要求非常苛刻的游戏来说,它已经不够用了,这也是 VRAM 较低造成的。有关 RTX 2050 的更多游戏基准测试,请访问我们的技术版块并进行比较。.
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 157.7 | 151.7 | 91.8 | 45.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 72.1 | 59.1 | 34 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 150.3 | 113.9 | 109.9 | 104.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 94 | 49.9 | 35.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 99 | 86.5 | 71.8 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 173 | 75.7 | 62.6 | 54.6 |
God of War (2022) | 59.5 | 44.6 | 26.5 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 107.4 | 93.4 | 68.5 | 21.1 |
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 34.5 | 25.9 | 18.6 | |
Returnal (2023) | 34.6 | 30.8 | 24.1 | |
Atomic Heart (2023) | 48.7 | 29.5 | 29.1 | |
Sons of the Forest (2023) | 35.9 | 34.1 | 33 | |
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 21.8 | 20.1 | 19.1 | |
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 18.8 | 17.9 | 16.7 | |
Atlas Fallen (2023) | 52.2 | 42.9 | 29.7 | |
Immortals of Aveum (2023) | 22.7 | 17 | 14.3 | |
Armored Core 6 (2023) | 42.6 | 35.9 | 32 | 29.6 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 35.8 | 30 | 28 |
排放物:宏碁笔记本电脑的风扇大多处于活动状态
噪音排放
在办公室使用或加载任何网站时,风扇已经开始转动。根据所选的性能模式,噪音可能会稍大一些,也可能保持相当安静。在正常模式(平衡)下,我们测得的平均负载噪音为 32 dB(A),游戏时为 46.7 dB(A)。
这使得 Aspire 5 A515-58GM 的噪音甚至超过了游戏笔记本电脑联想 LOQ 15和华硕TUF Gaming A15更强的 GPU,因为它们依赖于更好的冷却系统。惠普惠普 Envy x360 15在我们的对比中仍然是最安静的。
去年的 Aspire 5采用相同 GPU 的 Aspire 5 在游戏时噪音稍低(42 dB(A)),但在纯 CPU 负载和空闲模式下噪音则要大得多。我们还注意到,在静音模式下,CPU 负载时风扇转速波动很大(见 "测试条件 "部分)。风扇的低音调相当不错,另一个积极的方面是,我们在测试机型中没有注意到任何其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26.3 / 26.3 / 26.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.5 / 49 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.04 dB(A) |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8 | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F R7 5700U, Vega 8 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7 | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M | Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 10% | -1% | 14% | 4% | -1% | -19% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 25.04 | 23.3 7% | 23.1 8% | 22.7 9% | 25.4 -1% | 26 -4% | 26 -4% | 25 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.3 | 23.3 11% | 23.1 12% | 22.7 14% | 25.4 3% | 26 1% | 26 1% | 25 5% |
Idle Average * | 26.3 | 23.3 11% | 23.1 12% | 22.7 14% | 25.4 3% | 26 1% | 26 1% | 29 -10% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.3 | 23.3 11% | 25.2 4% | 22.7 14% | 25.4 3% | 26 1% | 28.1 -7% | 31 -18% |
Load Average * | 32.5 | 29.6 9% | 44.3 -36% | 23.3 28% | 34 -5% | 42.6 -31% | 56.9 -75% | 46 -42% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.7 | 43 8% | 45.8 2% | 43.4 7% | 42 10% | |||
Load Maximum * | 49 | 43 12% | 52 -6% | 43.4 11% | 40 18% | 37.4 24% | 62.6 -28% | 47 4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
旋转风扇的一个优点是在最大负载下表面温度很低,远低于 40 °C,但这在一定程度上是 CPU 和 GPU 性能低下的必然结果。我们的热图像还显示,冷却系统本身的温度不会超过约 51 °C。而竞争对手在这方面的表现一直较差。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M | Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -14% | -18% | 3% | -20% | -7% | -29% | -10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.7 | 48.9 -37% | 44.4 -24% | 36.2 -1% | 39.4 -10% | 40.5 -13% | 50.2 -41% | 43 -20% |
Maximum Bottom * | 36.8 | 44.6 -21% | 52 -41% | 37.8 -3% | 45.4 -23% | 42 -14% | 50.2 -36% | 48 -30% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.9 | 27.1 3% | 28 -0% | 25.4 9% | 33.2 -19% | 26.5 5% | 32.1 -15% | 26 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.9 | 27.5 1% | 29.6 -6% | 26.6 5% | 35.1 -26% | 29 -4% | 34.6 -24% | 27 3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
几秒钟后,CPU 在综合压力测试中达到 92 °C,这意味着它的主频从 4.55 GHz 降至 2.2 GHz,大大高于 1.2 GHz 的基本时钟频率。在此期间,主频很快提升至 3GHz。
GPU 的主频先是 1 GHz,然后平衡到 864 MHz,温度相对较低,为 71 °C。在纯 GPU 压力测试中,它的频率一直保持在 1,115 MHz。在 Witcher 3压力测试期间,最高频率为 1,400 MHz,最低频率为 1,315 MHz。在最大 TGP 时,RTX 2050RTX 2050能够持续提供高达约 1,500 MHz 的频率。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | 0.02 | - | 34 | 39 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.87 | - | 70 | 53 |
Prime95+FurMark | 2.18 | 864 | 76 | 71 |
Witcher 3 压力 | 0.93 | 1,350 | 63 | 67 |
FurMark 压力 | 0.26 | 1,115 | 55 | 62 |
发言人
我们认为,Aspire 5 的 2x 2 瓦扬声器和低于平均水平的屏幕是它不是一款多媒体笔记本电脑的主要原因。作为一款典型的办公笔记本电脑,Aspire 5 扬声器的音质很差,缺乏低音,最大音量也不高,只有 76 dB(A)。
朝下的扬声器在全音量时也容易失真。惠普的 Envy 系列、联想的LOQ 15和华为的MateBook D 系列提供了更好的声音体验。
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理:电池寿命更长的 Aspire 5
耗电量:
其平均闲置功耗为 6.5 瓦,低于其前一代产品。 前代产品的(8 瓦)。游戏时,该笔记本电脑的平均耗电量为 61 瓦,而华硕TUF GAMING A15配备了RTX 4050的耗电量则高达 136 瓦。联想ThinkBook 16 G4+的功耗为 83 瓦,因为其RTX 2050具有更高的 60 瓦 TGP。
虽然在 Cinebench R23 基准测试中,性能从 83.7 瓦明显骤降至 47 瓦,但这并不是电源太弱造成的,而是 CPU 热节流造成的。
Off / Standby | 0.353 / 0.7 Watt |
Idle | 4.31 / 6.52 / 8.037 Watt |
Load |
75.2 / 89.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U R7 5700U, GeForce MX450, Kingston OM8PDP3256B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F R7 5700U, Vega 8, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 35% | 7% | -77% | 18% | 25% | 16% | 0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.31 | 4 7% | 3 30% | 3.9 10% | 8 -86% | 3.9 10% | 3.8 12% | 3.7 14% | 4.4 -2% |
Idle Average * | 6.52 | 8 -23% | 5.5 16% | 7.6 -17% | 12.1 -86% | 7.2 -10% | 6.6 -1% | 7.9 -21% | 5.1 22% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.037 | 13 -62% | 8.2 -2% | 11 -37% | 12.5 -56% | 7.3 9% | 8 -0% | 9.3 -16% | 9.3 -16% |
Load Average * | 75.2 | 62 18% | 34.2 55% | 53.3 29% | 74.9 -0% | 46.7 38% | 33.4 56% | 41 45% | 67 11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 60.8 | 60 1% | 30.2 50% | 42.8 30% | 136.6 -125% | 41.1 32% | 33.6 45% | 41 33% | 66.4 -9% |
Load Maximum * | 89.5 | 70 22% | 38 58% | 64.9 27% | 185 -107% | 64.8 28% | 54 40% | 52.2 42% | 93.5 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
Aspire 5 A515(2023)配备的 48 瓦时电池比其直接前代产品的续航时间整整延长了 25%。 前代产品这可能也是英特尔 U 系列 CPU 的功劳。这款办公笔记本电脑的续航时间为 8:42 小时,略低于同类产品的平均水平。
电池充电至 80% 只需一个多小时。不过,鉴于其最大充电功率为 33 瓦,因此谈不上快速充电。
在我们的比较领域,竞争对手完全依赖 AMD CPU,而且大多持续时间更长,例如IdeaPad 5 1514 小时,甚至VivoBook S15也只用了 11.5 个小时。这两款产品的电池容量都高达 70 Wh。
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 50 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R4R1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, 48 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7, 70 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F R7 5700U, Vega 8, 54 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, 51 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, 70 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 60 Wh | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -24% | 16% | 69% | 35% | 1% | 25% | -31% | 24% | 33% | |
H.264 | 397 | 525 32% | 925 133% | 645 62% | 766 93% | 747 88% | 728 ? 83% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 522 | 424 -19% | 652 25% | 839 61% | 627 20% | 612 17% | 692 33% | 441 -16% | 701 34% | 612 ? 17% |
Load | 118 | 84 -29% | 107 -9% | 134 14% | 144 22% | 100 -15% | 59 -50% | 65 -45% | 59 -50% | 117.8 ? 0% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 110 | 142 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论一款搭载 RTX 显卡的超值预算笔记本电脑
宏碁 Aspire 5 是一款有点矛盾的产品,因为它是一款配备了入门级图形芯片的经济型笔记本电脑,却以中端游戏笔记本电脑的价格销售。因此,你需要非常清楚自己对笔记本电脑的要求:
如果你正在寻找一款简单而可靠的办公设备,那么你应该选择不带 dGPU 的 Aspire 5。另一方面,对于一款多媒体笔记本电脑来说,你不仅仅需要一个强大的 GPU。它还需要一个好的屏幕,最好还有好的扬声器,而这两点 Aspire 5 都不具备。或者,您想经常玩分辨率和细节适中的游戏?那么您就应该考虑一下经济型游戏笔记本电脑,如联想LOQ 15、LOQ 16 或华硕TUF Gaming A15.
Aspire 5 的优势包括:两个内存组、舒适的键盘(注意,在强光下并不十分清晰)和较高的系统性能,这对于上网冲浪来说是个不错的选择--但在连续负载的情况下也会大大降低性能。此外,这款笔记本电脑还配备了 Thunderbolt 4、USB-C Power Delivery,带有金属盖的塑料外壳也相当坚固。
其他优点还包括可持续包装和可靠的指纹扫描仪。此外,其安装的RTX 2050可以在中等细节设置和全高清条件下应对许多新游戏。这款全能型笔记本电脑还可用于视频编辑--只要使用色彩空间覆盖率高、色彩描绘准确的外接显示器。即便如此,一台RTX 3050(Ti)或RTX 4050更高的 TGP 值,尤其是考虑到笔记本电脑的售价。
购买哪个版本的宏碁 Aspire 5,一定要多加考虑:如果考虑到所有可行的替代方案,那么配备 dGPU 的 SKU 就没有太大意义了。从另一个角度看,作为一款纯粹的办公笔记本电脑,它确实有不少有趣的优势,比如两个内存组、Thunderbolt 4 以及良好的键盘。
这款笔记本的内部 FHD 显示屏太暗,不适合在室外使用,更不必要的是,宏碁将电池模式下的亮度进一步降至 220 cd/m²,甚至没有提供更好的面板。除此之外,还有一大堆臃肿的软件、只有一个 USB-C 端口和几乎总是能听到声音的风扇。
此外,其直接的前代产品 采用相同的 GPU 和无节流 CPU,价格便宜 200 美元,而采用GeForce MX550 的产品则便宜高达 450 美元。与 Aspire 5(2023)价格相同,你还可以买到Swift X SFX16 ,它的屏幕更大,sRGB 覆盖率达 96%,配备 RTX 3050 和第 11 代处理器,在永久负载下运行速度几乎一样快。
价格便宜得多的另一款产品是联想IdeaPad Pro 5 16配备 QHD 120-Hz 显示屏、AMD Ryzen 7、快速 iGPU(Radeon 680MRadeon 680M)和焊接内存。戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 配备了RTX 3050.惠普惠普 Envy 16非常坚固耐用,键盘也非常出色。MateBook D 16出于各种原因,MateBook D 16 也可能是一个不错的选择。ThinkPad E15ThinkPad E15是专用办公笔记本电脑的不错替代品,它拥有更好的键盘、更亮的显示屏和诱人的价格。
价格和供应情况
GeForce RTX 2050、英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U、16 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘和全高清 IPS 显示屏的 SKU 目前在亚马逊上的售价约为 1,000 美元。
此外,我们还建议您关注配备英特尔酷睿 i5 和 512GB 固态硬盘的廉价版。
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
- 09/19/2023 v7 (old)
Marvin Gollor
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.