华硕ROG手机5 Pro评测--更好的游戏智能机
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 239 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" | 2448x1080 | |
| 81.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Nubia RedMagic 6R SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 186.41 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 SD 870, Adreno 650 | 210 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 259 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.92" | 2460x1080 |
案例、设备和操作
ROG Phone 5 Pro不同于 标准变体视觉上，制造质量处于同一水平。然而，最大的区别是在背面，因为Pro有一个所谓的ROG Vision显示屏，而不是点RGB矩阵。这可以显示较小的动画，也可以在给智能手机充电时提供关于当前电池状态的信息，并以适当的动画伴随着附件的连接。
另一个不同之处体现在交货范围上，因为盒子里包括外部AeroActive Cooler 5。
该设备对于智能手机来说是独一无二的。除了用于连接风扇的Pogo PIN，旁边还有一个USB 3.2端口（第2代，最高10GBit/s，支持HDMI和dP，最高UHD，QC 5.0），底部边缘还有一个额外的USB 2.0端口（QC 3.0），可用于游戏时供电。此外，额外的超声波按键AirTrigger 5和一个带有高保真音频DAC的音频插孔也在机身上。
使用带有内部ROG UI的操作系统Android 11。不喜欢这个的用户可以在设置过程中切换到标准UI，这与纯粹的Android 非常相似。
所有现代标准都用于移动数据连接，专业版支持的LTE和5G频段的数量再次增加。Wi-Fi 6E是一种快速的WLAN标准，可以通过双WLAN同时连接到两个网络，在与Netgear Nighthawk AX12的测试中实现了高而稳定的数据传输。
ROG手机的语音质量确实很好，拿在耳边时能提供非常好的清晰度，只有在非常大的环境噪音中才能达到极限。扬声器模式略有混响，但具有良好的麦克风范围和质量。这款华硕智能手机可以接受两张nano-SIM卡，并支持VoLTE。
ROG Phone 5不仅有高达144赫兹的刷新率，而且300赫兹的触摸采样率也非常高，有望在触摸屏上快速实现输入，延迟为24.3毫秒。在生物识别安全方面，显示屏上有一个光学指纹扫描仪，它的识别率相当可靠，但不是最快的之一。二维人脸识别也是可能的。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro | |
| Nubia RedMagic 6R | |
| Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 4 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 | |
| Nubia RedMagic 6R | |
相机--ROG手机5 Pro的三重光学装置
ROG Phone 5 Pro依靠的是由三个镜头组成的相机设置。除了64MP主镜头，还集成了一个超广角和一个微距镜头。尽管索尼的传感器仍然是去年的，但可以用它拍出好照片，而且在分辨率方面的高储备允许较小的变焦水平，而不会有太大的质量损失。视频也可以用8K录制。
前置摄像头也能拍出好照片，但它不能完全补偿背光。视频可以以每秒60帧的全高清方式创建。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleWide-angleUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
显示器 - 改进的直流调光
华硕ROG手机5 Pro的显示屏与标准版相同。 标准版本.它的尺寸为6.78英寸，采用全高清Plus分辨率，最高可达144赫兹。OLED面板在纯白显示中达到了806 cd/m²，并启用了环境光传感器。在明亮和黑暗区域均匀分布的情况下（APL50），它的亮度为1,088 cd/m²，APL10为1,136 cd/m²。如果你手动调整亮度，你有488 cd/m²可供支配。
值得肯定的是，华硕已经改进了直流调光。虽然这仍然只适用于60赫兹，但它现在实际上是有效的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 789 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.8" | Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 AMOLED, 2460x1080, 6.9" | Nubia RedMagic 6R AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -30% | 111% | -165% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.4 ? | 8 ? -233% | 4 ? -67% | 11 ? -358% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2.4 ? | 6 ? -150% | 3.2 ? -33% | 6 ? -150% |
| PWM Frequency | 144.5 ? | 568 293% | 769 ? 432% | 162.3 12% |
| Screen | -77% | -52% | -115% | |
| Brightness middle | 789 | 463 -41% | 442 -44% | 676 -14% |
| Brightness | 795 | 466 -41% | 442 -44% | 669 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 90 -8% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 3.24 -131% | 2.2 -57% | 5.77 -312% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 5.75 -92% | 4.9 -63% | 9.81 -227% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.4 -159% | 3.3 -94% | 3.7 -118% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.201 100% | 2.25 98% | 1.959 112% |
| CCT | 6596 99% | 7273 89% | 7101 92% | 6584 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -54% /
-62% | 30% /
2% | -140% /
-131% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 144.5 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |   |
The display backlight flickers at 144.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 144.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命
| Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro | Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 | Nubia RedMagic 6R | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -4% | -14% | -7% | 17% | 21% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1864 | 1999 7% | 1330 -29% | 1663 -11% | 1846 ? -1% | 1839 ? -1% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 785 | 754 -4% | 690 -12% | 760 -3% | 1199 ? 53% | 1425 ? 82% |
| Random Read 4KB | 292.9 | 262.6 -10% | 227.2 -22% | 283.1 -3% | 282 ? -4% | 277 ? -5% |
| Random Write 4KB | 287.2 | 261.5 -9% | 312.9 9% | 259.9 -10% | 338 ? 18% | 309 ? 8% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Tests
扬声器
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro 6000 mAh | Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 5500 mAh | Nubia RedMagic 6R 4200 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 4500 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 885 | 907 2% | 541 -39% | 710 -20% | 984 ? 11% |
Pros
Cons
结论 -- 小小的专业，但有更多的内存
华硕的ROG Phone 5 Pro对于其相当高昂的附加费用来说，其附加值出乎意料地少。背面的Vision显示屏当然是个不错的噱头，但在日常使用中并没有提供任何附加价值。内存的翻倍和额外的频段可能更有趣，而且还包括AeroActive Cooler 5，否则也需要60欧元（约70美元）。
华硕ROG手机5 Pro主要针对的是对内存要求高的用户。
尽管如此，ROG Phone 5 Pro仍然是目前最好的游戏智能手机，拥有强大的配置。除了144赫兹的AMOLED显示屏，性能稳定的处理器、额外的超声波感应键、两个USB接口以及对120和144赫兹的游戏的广泛支持尤为重要。
更便宜的替代品是 黑鲨4或 RedMagic 6R，但它们也必须在速度、功能和可选配件方面做出让步。
价格和可用性
ROG Phone 5 Pro目前很难买到，在本评论发表时，它甚至从Asus eShop上消失了。而主要可以通过亚洲网站如AliExpress购买。
Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
