Notebookcheck Logo

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 评测：从游戏智能手机到高端智能手机

进化。

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 正从小众产品演变为主流宠儿。这款 6.78 英寸的设备配备了骁龙 8 代 3 处理器、高达 24 GB 的内存和 1 TB 的存储空间，必将赢得游戏玩家的青睐。在我们的评测中，它还以低调的设计和丰富的功能证明了自己是一款强大的全能型产品，让Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 等竞争对手望尘莫及。
5G Android Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro

华硕对其游戏智能手机进行了革新。与前代产品一样，ROG Phone 8 采用了市场上最快的硬件，但在使用理念上有了新的整体侧重点。

其根本重点仍然是游戏，"Republic of Gamers"（玩家共和国）的后缀明确无误地反映了这一点。然而，对于华硕智能手机来说，游戏利基市场已经变得太小，它现在的目标是成为一款适合大众的高端智能手机。我们的评测将揭示华硕在这方面是否成功。

ROG Phone 8 有两种型号。第一款简单地称为 ROG Phone 8，而我们评测的是第二款，即 ROG Phone 8 Pro。两者仅在内存和配件两个方面有所不同。

ROG Phone 8 有 12 GB LPDDR5X 内存和 256 GB UFS 4.0 内存，而 ROG Phone 8 Pro 则有高达 24 GB 的内存和高达 1 TB 的存储空间。此外，只有 ROG Phone 8 Pro 配备了 AeroActive Cooler X 主动风扇，该风扇通过第二个 USB 端口连接到智能手机上。

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (ROG Phone 8 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
24 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.78 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, OLED, FHD+, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, LTPO 1-120 Hz, Always-On display, 2500 Nits peak brightness, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 996 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: In-display fingerprint sensor, face recognition, accelerometer, e-compass, gyroscope, proximity sensor, ambient-light sensor, AirTrigger, 2nd USB-C port, WiFi Direct, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, QC 5.0
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (800/850/900/1700/1900/2100 MHz), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n18/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78/n79); Head SAR 1.441 W/kg, Body SAR 1.487 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.8 x 76.8
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix Main camera (Sony IMX890, 1/1.56", F/1.9, 23.8mm, Gimbal OIS) + 32 MP tele (f/2.4, 65.3mm, OIS, 3x optical zoom) + 13 MP ultrawide (120° FOV, 12.7mm); video recording up to 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix 22mm, video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, AeroActive Cooler X, Aero case, 65W power adapter, USB-C cable, SIM tray needle, documentation, ROG UI, 24 Months Warranty, programmable mini-LED lighting with 341 LEDs on the backcover, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2-API-Level: Level 3, fanless, waterproof
Weight
225 g, Power Supply: 128 g
Price
1499 Euro
Links
Asus homepage
Asus notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
88.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		225 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2400x1080
91.1 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU		221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
90.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		239 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2448x1080
89 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
90.1 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Honor Magic5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		219 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.81"2848x1312
86.8 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
89.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi 14 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		223 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
背面有 341 个可编程微型 LED 灯。
背面有 341 个可编程微型 LED 灯。

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 只有魅影黑 一种颜色，第一眼看上去，已经看不出它是一款游戏智能手机。与ROG Phone 7 Ultimate 不同的是，它不再有抢眼的双色设计。ROG Phone 8 Pro 唯一突出的细节是后盖上的亮黑色横条纹。

背面的小型附加显示屏也不再可见。虽然显示屏还在，但在不显示通知或其他信息时，显示屏就看不到了。此外，Republic of Gamers 的徽标也更加内敛。这是这款智能手机游戏基因的明显标志，不再使用对比色，而是在磨砂玻璃背面使用亮黑色字样，使其更加低调。

ROG Phone 8 Pro 是一款做工非常精良的智能手机，缝隙平齐均匀，整体感觉就像一款高档手机。与重 239 克的前代产品相比，它的重量明显减轻了，仅为 225 克，机身也更纤薄，仅为 8.9 毫米（约合 1.5 英寸）。

ROG Phone 7 Ultimate: 10.3 毫米）。这对稳定性没有影响。在我们进行的压力测试中，ROG Phone 8 Pro 没有出现变形或凹陷。它的防尘防水等级也达到了 IP68。

由大猩猩 Victus 2 玻璃保护的 OLED 面板也变得纤薄了。它的四边显示屏边缘变得更窄，使 ROG Phone 8 Pro 的外观比前代产品更加清新。从数字上看，屏占比从 82% 提高到了 88%。

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro

尺寸比较

❌
173 mm 77 mm 10.3 mm 239 g163.98 mm 76.35 mm 8.9 mm 229 g163.8 mm 76.8 mm 8.9 mm 225 g162.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.77 mm 219 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 8.49 mm 223 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 配备两个 USB-C 端口和高达 24GB 内存

华硕提供两种配置的 ROG Phone 8 Pro。第一种配置为 16 GB LPDDR5X 内存和 512 GB UFS 4.0 存储空间，官方售价为 1199 美元。第二款配置为 24 GB 内存和 1 TB 存储空间的 ROG Phone 8 Pro Edition，华硕的售价为 1499 美元。该机没有 microSD 存储卡插槽。

两个 USB-C 端口对于智能手机来说很不寻常。像往常一样，一个位于手机底部，工作速度为 USB 3.2 Gen.2，支持 PD 3.0 和 Quick Charge 5.0。在我们使用华硕 ROG Strix Arion 手机壳中的 M2.SSD Samsung 980 Pro（USB 3.2 Gen.2）进行的拷贝测试中，ROG Phone 8 Pro 的传输速率为 299.8 MB/s--绝对不低，但考虑到 USB 3.2 Gen.2 端口的 10 GBit/s 带宽，传输速率还是有点低。

左侧长条形的第二个 USB-C 端口用于连接外置风扇，但也可以在游戏时为 ROG Phone 8 Pro 充电。这在横向握持智能手机时尤为实用。如果采用标准连接方式，USB 线缆会很碍事。

当 AeroActive Cooler X 停靠时，通过第二个 USB-C 端口充电也同样有效，因为它也有一个 USB-C 端口。如果外置风扇设置为以最大 "冰冻 "功率运行，这也是必不可少的，因为电源装置必须连接到其 USB-C 端口。

ROG Phone 8 Pro 是少数配备 3.5 毫米插孔的高端智能手机之一。SIM 卡插槽可插入两张 nano SIM 卡。此外，还配备了永远在线的显示屏，由于采用了 LPTO 面板，可以以节能方式显示，理想情况下刷新率仅为 1 Hz。

左: USB-C
左: USB-C
右侧空气触发器、音量摇杆、电源按钮、麦克风、空气触发器
右侧空气触发器、音量摇杆、电源按钮、麦克风、空气触发器
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部： 3.5 毫米音频插孔、扬声器、SIM 卡插槽、USB-C、麦克风
底部： 3.5 毫米音频插孔、扬声器、SIM 卡插槽、USB-C、麦克风

软件 -Android 14 和 4 年更新

ROG Phone 8 Pro 运行Android 14 和制造商自己的用户界面 ROG UI。华硕计划在 4 年内为其智能手机提供更新和 2 次操作系统升级。在 2 月初进行评测时，ROG Phone 8 Pro 收到了更新，将其Android 安全补丁的有效期延长至 2023 年 12 月 1 日。

除了未来感十足的标准暗影精英 设计外，ROG UI 与原版Android 基本没有区别。用户还可以随时选择标准的Android 主题。

ROG UI 中集成了一些游戏功能。最高性能模式X 模式直接显示在时间旁边的顶行。除性能模式外，Armory Crate 应用程序还可用于配置所有重要的智能手机组件，如 AirTrigger、后盖显示屏和外置风扇。用户还可以在游戏时使用特殊的叠加功能直接优化游戏设置。

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和一系列蜂窝频率

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 的蜂窝频率覆盖范围非常好。华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 拥有 25 个 4G 频段和 20 个 5G 频段，几乎在任何地方都能获得信号。蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC 也是智能手机通信硬件的一部分。

华硕智能手机支持 WiFi 7，但由于缺乏相应的路由器，我们无法测试智能手机的 WiFi 7 速度。不过，WiFi 6E 的传输速率令人印象深刻，发送速率高达 1734 MBit/s，接收速率峰值为 1505 MBit/s。高端对比设备的传输速率都非常接近。

Networking
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
815 (min: 767) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
941 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1734 (min: 1577) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1505 (min: 659) MBit/s ∼87%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼78%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
iperf3 receive AXE11000
822 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1760 (min: 1669) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1471) MBit/s ∼88%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼85%
Honor Magic5 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1531 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1474 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼82%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1660 (min: 1500) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1801 (min: 1553) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1716 (min: 829) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1613 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼93%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1717 (min: 1627) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1728 (min: 1374) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1731 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼79%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1577-1828)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1728 (1374-1860)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (659-1568)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1727 (1657-1754)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (767-825)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1711 (1627-1762)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (475-989)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1753 (911-1896)
室内 GPS 信号
室内 GPS 信号
户外 GPS 信号
户外 GPS 信号

在定位方面，ROG Phone 8 Pro 使用的卫星导航服务包括 GPS（L1、L5）、伽利略（E1、E5a）、Glonass（L1）、北斗（B1、B2a）和 QZSS（L1、L5），几乎都是双频的。无论在室外还是室内，我们的定位精度都能达到三米。

在一次短途骑行中，我们将智能手机的定位技能与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较，结果显示 ROG Phone 8 Pro 非常适合导航任务。在大多数情况下，它记录的路线与健身智能手表一样精确。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：环湖
GPS 测试：环湖
GPS 测试：循环
GPS 测试：循环

电话和语音质量

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 为两张 nano SIM 卡预留了空间。两张卡均可作为首选 SIM 卡，用于语音通话、短信或数据服务。支持 VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话。不过，我们没有找到 eSIM 激活选项。

ROG Phone 8 Pro 有三个麦克风，确保了良好的语音质量。集成的噪音抑制功能能有效过滤环境噪音，在免提模式下也能很好地工作。

摄像头 - 配备索尼 IMX890 的云台稳定三摄像头

用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照

华硕对其智能手机的摄像头进行了重大升级，这也是为了不辜负自己的高端主张所必需的，因为在游戏智能手机上，摄像头通常只能充当次要角色。虽然 ROG Phone 7 终极版在图像质量方面无法与其他旗舰手机相比。ROG Phone 8 Pro 在某些方面做得更好，但也不足以获得最高荣誉。

自拍摄像头保持不变，仍为 3200 万像素，通过 4 合 1 像素分档拍摄 800 万像素照片，但拍照效果更好，尤其是在光线条件较差的情况下。该摄像头具有 90° 的视野范围，非常适合集体自拍。您可以根据需要在 1 倍变焦和 0.7 倍超广角视角之间切换。自拍相机能以最高每秒 30 帧的速度录制全高清视频。

索尼 IMX890 取代了索尼 IMX766，成为 5000 万像素主摄像头。1/1.56 英寸格式的图像传感器也出现在 Nothing Phone (2)采用 f/1.9 光圈，相当于 23.8 毫米的全画幅。拍照时，主摄像头标准使用 4 倍像素二进制，并支持云台防抖，可拍摄全高清和 60 FPS 的视频。另外，全 5000 万像素也可用于拍照。

使用超广角摄像头（0.7 倍变焦）拍摄的照片
使用超广角摄像头（0.7 倍变焦）拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照
使用长焦相机（3 倍光学变焦）拍摄的照片
使用长焦相机（3 倍光学变焦）拍摄的照片

主摄像头在日光下也能拍摄出色彩自然、清晰度高的优质照片。极短的快门延迟也令人印象深刻。不过，如果仔细观察，照片有时会被严重锐化，看起来不再特别逼真。例如，在第二张日光照片的湖边或一般物体的边缘，就可以清楚地看到这一点。在弱光环境下拍摄时，主摄像头明显难以拍摄出光线充足、清晰锐利的照片，而且照片还略带蓝色。

1300 万像素超广角摄像头在光线充足的条件下成像质量尚可，但并无特别之处，尤其是对于 ROG Phone 8 Pro 的价格区间而言。长焦摄像头沿用了 ROG Phone 7 Ultimate 的微距摄像头，也是标准配置。长焦镜头的分辨率为 3200 万像素，具有 3 倍光学变焦和光学防抖功能，拍照效果非常出色。


。

相机模块的最大改进是视频录制，因为集成的云台可以出色地稳定视频录制。总体而言，ROG Phone 8 Pro 的视频拍摄效果比 ROG Phone 7 Ultimate 好得多，在细节和图像清晰度方面仅次于旗舰竞争产品。视频录制速度高达 8K，每秒 24 帧。可在三个镜头之间切换，最高可达 30 FPS 的 4K。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light photo

在可控的照明条件下，如果环境光线合适，主摄像头可以非常精确地捕捉色彩。然而，在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下，照片实验室中的图像偏蓝，只能艰难地识别测试图。

ColorChecker
5.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro: 4.71 ∆E min: 1.14 - max: 8.18 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
58.6 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
39 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
60.6 ∆E
60.3 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
69 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
66.1 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro: 43.36 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 69.01 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括主动风扇和 65 瓦电源装置

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 随附 65 瓦电源适配器、USB-C 数据线、透明保护壳、SIM 卡工具、快速入门指南和保修卡。24GB/1TB 版本还包括 AeroActive Cooler X 主动风扇和保护壳。

华硕还为 ROG Phone 8 Pro 提供ROG Tessen 游戏控制器。用于 ROG Phone 8 Pro。与外置风扇一样，它通过 USB-C 接口与智能手机连接，并将其转化为手持设备。不过，在进行评测时，游戏控制器尚未上市。

华硕为 ROG Phone 8 Pro 提供 24 个月的保修服务。

ROG Phone 8 Pro 包装很大。
ROG Phone 8 Pro 包装很大。
AeroActive Cooler X 主动风扇连接到第二个 USB-C 端口。
AeroActive Cooler X 主动风扇连接到第二个 USB-C 端口。
供货范围还包括一个 65 瓦的电源装置。
供货范围还包括一个 65 瓦的电源装置。

输入设备和操作 - 后盖上的可编程第二显示屏

ROG Phone 8 Pro 的电容式触摸屏对触摸的反应非常迅速和精确。菜单、应用程序和游戏也是如此。凭借 骁龙 8 代 3和高达 24GB 的 RAM，ROG Phone 8 Pro 可以毫无延迟地处理所有输入和轻扫手势。在我们的测试过程中，无论我们打开多少应用程序或使用多少智能手机，这种高水平的性能都没有丝毫改变。X 轴线性马达提供了强大的反馈。

ROG Phone 8 Pro 可以通过集成在显示屏中的光学指纹传感器进行生物解锁，该传感器的工作也非常快速可靠。另外，还可以使用自拍摄像头设置 2D 面部识别，但这种方式不太安全。

后盖上的可编程副显示屏名为AniMe Vision ，可通过 341 个微型 LED 显示动画信息（如来电、电池状态、时间、新通知等）。具体应该显示什么信息，可以通过 Armory Crate 应用程序进行配置。在那里，用户可以选择预定义的动画，也可以创建自己的动画。

纵向模式键盘
纵向模式键盘
横向模式键盘
横向模式键盘

显示屏 - 2500 nits 高亮度 LTPO 面板，165 Hz

子像素网格
子像素网格

ROG Phone 8 Pro 的 2400 x 1080 像素分辨率 LTPO OLED 面板支持 HDR10 和 HDR HLG，刷新率高达 165 Hz。在默认设置下，刷新率会根据显示内容自动调整。不过，也可以手动设置为 60、120 或 165 Hz。

分辨率和帧频几乎与前代产品保持一致 - ROG Phone 7 Ultimate。 ROG Phone 7 Ultimate的分辨率为 2448 x 1080，只是略高一些。不过，ROG Phone 8 Pro 的 OLED 面板在亮度方面有了显著提升。

在纯白背景下，屏幕的平均亮度为 1698 cd/m²。在明暗图像区域均匀分布的情况下（APL18），亮度甚至增加到 2502 cd/m²，因此完全达到了制造商规定的 2500 nits。HDR 内容的亮度大致相同（2596 cd/m²）。如果关闭亮度传感器，手动调节亮度，显示屏亮度最高可达 806 cd/m²。在最低亮度设置下，我们测得的亮度仍为 6.39 cd/m²，亮度相对较高，尤其在黑暗中会显得相当刺眼。

OLED 面板使用脉宽调制来控制亮度，但闪烁频率相对较高，为 485 Hz，这对敏感人群来说应该没有问题。还可以在显示设置中激活闪烁保护功能，从而减少低亮度时的脉宽调制闪烁。

1701
cd/m²		1686
cd/m²		1706
cd/m²
1710
cd/m²		1699
cd/m²		1699
cd/m²
1714
cd/m²		1676
cd/m²		1689
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1714 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1697.8 cd/m² Minimum: 6.39 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1699 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"		Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.8"		Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.7"		Honor Magic5 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"		Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"		Xiaomi 14 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
8%
6%
12%
-6%
12%
3%
Brightness middle
1699
1102
-35%
1010
-41%
1510
-11%
1291
-24%
1035
-39%
1025
-40%
Brightness
1698
1102
-35%
1016
-40%
1467
-14%
1289
-24%
1031
-39%
1046
-38%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
95
-3%
92
-6%
96
-2%
96
-2%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
1.1
42%
1.3
32%
1.1
42%
1.7
11%
1
47%
1.1
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.7
3.1
34%
2.5
47%
3.8
19%
4.4
6%
1.9
60%
2.9
38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
1.6
43%
1.6
43%
1.7
39%
2.9
-4%
1.6
43%
2.2
21%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.19 100%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.25 98%
CCT
6648 98%
6555 99%
6405 101%
6670 97%
6472 100%
6368 102%
6622 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 485 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 485 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 485 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

ROG Phone 8 Pro 显示内容的方式可通过总共 5 种图片模式进行调整。默认设置为 "最佳"，但我们在 "自然"模式下能获得最佳画质。在该模式下，OLED 面板的色彩和灰度显示均在理想范围内，色温和伽玛等图像参数也几乎完全符合要求。

色彩保真度（屏幕色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩保真度（屏幕色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（屏幕色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（屏幕色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
灰度（屏幕色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
灰度（屏幕色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩饱和度（屏幕色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩饱和度（屏幕色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6525 ms rise
↘ 0.483 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5235 ms rise
↘ 0.655 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

即使在明亮的户外，ROG Phone 8 Pro 也能始终保持清晰易读，因此在夏季不太可能受到任何限制。在评测时，寒风凛冽的光线条件也没有对视角稳定的 OLED 面板造成任何挑战。

室外使用（自动显示亮度）
室外使用（自动显示亮度）
室外使用（全亮显示）
室外使用（全亮显示）
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 配备骁龙 8 代 3 处理器的 ROG Phone 8 Pro

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 配备了 骁龙 8 代 3这使得这款智能手机成为目前市场上速度最快的手机之一。这款高端 SoC 由 Adreno 750图形芯片的支持，并且在我们的测试样品中配备了 24 GB LPDDR5X 内存和 1 TB UFS 4.0 存储空间。性能水平也相应较高。

在合成基准测试中，华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 与 努比亚红魔 9 Pro和 小米 14 Pro由于这三款智能手机采用了相同的 SoC，因此在Android 方面都名列前茅。不过，在 Geekbench 6 中，三者均被以下手机击败 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.

在 Geekbench 6 中，我们用 ROG Phone 8 Pro 在最高性能模式 X 模式下进行了两次测量：一次不带风扇，一次带风扇。在有风扇的情况下，这款智能手机的单核和多核性能得分都略高，但与 "无风扇 "测试的整体差异很小。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
1672 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1343 - 1702, n=14)
1652 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1575 Points -6%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1486 Points -11%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1482 Points -11%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points -40%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
6415 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=14)
6058 Points -6%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5393 Points -16%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5182 Points -19%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4846 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -48%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +26%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2318 Points
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2258 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2270 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=21)
2106 Points -9%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1985 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=161, last 2 years)
1446 Points -38%
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
7357 Points
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
7193 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
7151 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=21)
6638 Points -10%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5119 Points -30%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=161, last 2 years)
4028 Points -45%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
1650926 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1633806 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1468882 - 1650926, n=5)
1566955 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1322448 Points -20%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1227867 Points -26%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
896410 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points -52%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
21385 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
20943 Points -2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
19783 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 21628, n=20)
17861 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -26%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15550 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -39%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -45%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10897 Points +6%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
10235 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8148 - 10966, n=16)
9947 Points -3%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9585 Points -6%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8487 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points -38%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
System
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15935 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 16015, n=16)
13995 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
13729 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13642 Points -1%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11793 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points -26%
Memory
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11460 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
11263 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7426 - 12716, n=16)
10611 Points -6%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10467 Points -7%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9052 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points -40%
Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
36002 Points +4%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
34464 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (26972 - 39727, n=16)
34142 Points -1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
29649 Points -14%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
26616 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points -51%
Web
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2145 Points +4%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2059 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1994 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=16)
1962 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1826 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points -24%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points +52%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18048 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
17748 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16988 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=15)
16446 Points -7%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
16295 Points -8%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
11338 Points -36%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (963 - 245629, n=14)
101518 Points +6872%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points +1898%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +1677%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1693 Points +16%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
1456 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1362 Points -6%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1266 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -24%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%

在图形测试中，ROG Phone 8 Pro 再次领先于 努比亚红魔 9 Pro和 小米 14 Pro.但由于其 165 Hz 的刷新率，华硕智能手机在 GFXBench 屏幕测试中遥遥领先。总的来说 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max在如此强大的 GPU 能力面前显得力不从心。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5185 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5150 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points -25%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3732 Points -28%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3595 Points -31%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5226 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5143 Points -2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3773 Points -28%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points -28%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points -29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
19690 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19566 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points -22%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14093 Points -28%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13827 Points -30%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -55%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8480 Points +4%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
8172 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7036 Points -14%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6231 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points -38%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
33376 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33142 Points -1%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25478 Points -24%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24707 Points -26%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points -59%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20131 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
19803 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16100 Points -19%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14893 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
165 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps -12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -27%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -27%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -63%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -64%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -64%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
543 fps +9%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps -5%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
466 fps -6%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
446 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps -11%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
165 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps -12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -27%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -27%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -62%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -64%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -64%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
362 fps +15%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
327 fps +4%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
314 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
291 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps -17%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps -17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
158 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps -9%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -27%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -61%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -62%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -62%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps +8%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
259 fps +4%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
248 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps -17%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
206 fps -17%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -9%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -39%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -49%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -49%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -49%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +21%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps +3%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps -5%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps +26%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +3%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -2%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -10%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +25%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -6%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps -10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps +102%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +79%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps +49%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -3%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +14%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
163 fps -11%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps -11%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps -36%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -46%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps +5%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps +3%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps -19%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps -32%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -57%

ROG Phone 8 Pro 的浏览器性能非常好，在日常使用中可以看到网站速度非常快，可以快速滚动浏览。不过，这款华硕智能手机在浏览器基准测试中仅排名中上游。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +56%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
195.426 Points +20%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)
70.022 Points -57%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
162.564 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
162.37 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=19)
152.3 Points -6%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
131.215 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points -26%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
116.696 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min +168%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
215 runs/min +30%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)
69.6 runs/min -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=16)
207 runs/min +25%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
166 runs/min
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min -5%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
141 runs/min -15%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -18%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
111 runs/min -33%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
92 runs/min -45%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
181 Points +6%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
171 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
162 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=15)
161.7 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
130 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points -33%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -40%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
98 Points -43%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
304 Points +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (142 - 310, n=9)
208 Points +7%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
201 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
198 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
196 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
194 Points
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
129 Points -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +35%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
70135 Points +10%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)
25953 Points -59%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
63669 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
54365 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=19)
50413 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points -22%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
42421 Points -33%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
39825 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -84%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
981.4 ms * -15%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
918.6 ms * -8%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
852.3 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (546 - 2066, n=16)
841 ms * +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * +1%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
801.6 ms * +6%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)
679.5 ms * +20%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
653 ms * +23%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.0 存储为华硕智能手机提供了极高的数据吞吐量。即使是大型应用程序也能快速安装和加载。

Asus ROG Phone 8 ProAsus ROG Phone 7 UltimateHonor Magic5 ProNubia RedMagic 9 ProAverage 1 TB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
-31%
4%
-7%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
4016.67
3429.17
-15%
3344.12
-17%
4164.08
4%
3543 ?(3070 - 4017, n=8)
-12%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB
3153.4
3061.82
-3%
2651.87
-16%
3199.98
1%
3353 ?(2863 - 3908, n=8)
6%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
-55%
Random Read 4KB
434.63
450.1
4%
267.91
-38%
442.82
2%
397 ?(349 - 441, n=8)
-9%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
648
572.05
-12%
298.31
-54%
691.17
7%
572 ?(431 - 753, n=8)
-12%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
-52%

游戏 - 游戏内叠加和支持人工智能的附加功能

Armory Crate 应用程序是所有游戏设置的控制中心。同时，它还可以在游戏中叠加显示，并提供对当前性能模式的直接访问，以及宏录制、勿扰 模式和 FPS 计数器等功能。

ROG Phone 8 Pro 的游戏功能还包括 X Sense 2.0 和 AI Grabber 等人工智能功能。前者可以在支持的游戏（如《源氏冲击》）中自动拾取物品，而 AI Grabber 可以识别对话中的关键字，并根据要求启动谷歌搜索。例如，您可以直接在游戏中搜索任务的解决方案，或检索与游戏相关的其他提示。

通过游戏内的叠加功能，您可以调整所有重要的游戏设置。
通过游戏内的叠加功能，您可以调整所有重要的游戏设置。
人工智能抓取器等人工智能功能也是游戏的一部分。
人工智能抓取器等人工智能功能也是游戏的一部分。

从 华硕 ROG Phone 7 Ultimate也出现在 ROG Phone 8 Pro 上。AirTriggers 是两个超声波传感器，位于智能手机右侧长边的四角，可用作额外的 L 和 R 控制按钮。如果横握手机，食指可以轻松触及这两个按钮。通过 Armory Crate 应用程序，AirTrigger 按钮可以拖动到游戏用户界面的控制按钮上，然后触发调用菜单或更换武器等操作。

ROG Phone 8 Pro 可以在三种性能模式下运行。最强大的模式被称为X 模式 （或装有 AeroActive Cooler X 的X 模式+），可以直接通过通知屏幕激活。其他性能模式包括动态 模式（适合日常使用的均衡设置）和省电的超耐久 模式。每种模式的性能设置都可以单独调整。

在测试中，ROG Phone 8 Pro 运行游戏非常流畅。即使是图形要求非常高的游戏，如《源氏冲击》，在最高设置下也能在屏幕上流畅运行。但是，华硕智能手机拒绝使用我们通常用来确定帧率的 Gamebench 测试工具。另外，我们使用了 Perfdog 工具。

在 ROG Phone 8 Pro 的HRD/Extreme设置下，Perfdog 记录的最大帧速率为 60 FPS；在UltraHDR/Ultra（最高可选设置）下，帧速率为 40 FPS。在这两种情况下，帧速率的限制可能是出于节能的考虑。智能手机仅在最低图形模式下提供 90 FPS 模式。在最高细节级别下，《源氏冲击》的运行帧数始终保持在 60 FPS。这里还可能有更高的帧数，但游戏受到智能手机的限制。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
Perfdog PUBG Mobile（HDR/极限设置）：60 FPS
Perfdog PUBG Mobile（HDR/极限设置）：60 FPS
Perfdog Genshin Impact（图形质量：非常高）：60 FPS
Perfdog Genshin Impact（图形质量：非常高）：60 FPS

排放 - 功能强大的立体声扬声器

温度

配备 骁龙 8 代 3因此，ROG Phone 8 Pro 必须对产生大量废热的高端 SoC 进行散热。与小米 14 Pro 等竞争对手不同的是，在要求苛刻的 Burnout 基准的 1 小时压力测试中，它没有出现死机或任何错误信息。不过，这款智能手机的发热温度高达 46.8 °C，有些地方热得让人不舒服。

3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试显示，ROG Phone 8 Pro 无法在连续负载下保持性能，但仍取得了不错的成绩，稳定性得分分别为 77% 和 79.2%。在日常使用中，用户不会注意到任何热节流现象，因为华硕智能手机即使稍微拉一下手刹，仍然能提供充足的性能。

在压力测试中，使用或不使用外置风扇会产生很大的不同。在智能手机上安装 AeroActive Cooler X 后，3D Mark Wild Life 压力测试的稳定性得分分别提高到 92.7% 和 90.8%。对于长时间玩游戏并希望榨取最高性能的用户来说，风扇是最佳选择。风扇可根据当前系统负载自动调整冷却模式，但在转速较高时，声音会变得相当大。

Max. Load
 40.3 °C46.6 °C45.4 °C 
 45 °C46.8 °C46.3 °C 
 34.9 °C44.4 °C44 °C 
Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 43.7 °C
37.6 °C46 °C43.2 °C
41.7 °C45.3 °C45.1 °C
35.7 °C45.1 °C44.8 °C
Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 42.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.7 %
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 % -17%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.8 % -1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.4 % -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % -15%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % -15%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40.8 % -56%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
96.3 % +6%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94.3 % +4%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
90.8 %
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.2 % -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % -16%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % -28%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.9 % -48%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.5 % +19%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.3 %
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.1 % -18%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 % -21%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29.5 (28.4-31.3)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (24.5-31)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø30.2 (29.2-31)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.8 (103.3-111.5)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø96.1 (86.1-111.7)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø109.7 (102.5-112.2)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø117.1 (117-117.1)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.7 (24.3-29.1)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø29.2 (29.1-29.2)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.6 (24.1-28.9)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.8 (28.8-28.9)
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro

发言人

ROG Phone 8 Pro 的立体声扬声器音效强劲，甚至可以听到低音。即使不戴耳机，声音体验也相当不错。

外接音频设备可通过噪音极低的 3.5 毫米音频插孔（信噪比：100.75 dBFS）或蓝牙 5.3 连接到智能手机。ROG Phone 8 Pro 支持从 AAC、SBC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、LDAC、LC3 到 Opus 的各种蓝牙编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.636.12525.934.53123.435.64027.335.95036.238.76325.4408016.644.210016.946.612514.747.216013.152.320015.154.725014.357.331511.661.94001061.15009.167.663011.168.78009.173.1100011.875.812501576.9160011.377.520001281.2250012.383.2315012.784.9400012.683.8500013.179.7630013.478800013.577.11000013.574.51250013.663.71600013.657.3SPL24.792.2N0.687.8median 13.1median 74.5Delta1.39.937.642.224.730.82430.924.631.732.139.82233.916.432.52642.819.846.215.652.714.654.111.157.88.25911.560.29.967.78.471.210.271.61178.713.478.412.173.6127812.38112.482.71382.513.176.913.875.913.772.31478.113.774.412.862.224.790.50.683.5median 12.8median 73.61.58.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Phone 8 ProXiaomi 14 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 14 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 无线充电功率高达 15 瓦

耗电量

ROG Phone 8 Pro 的特点是功耗低。它的总体功耗比其他同样使用 骁龙 8 代 3.

通过随附的电源适配器，5500 毫安时电池的充电功率可达 65 瓦。在测试中，充满电需要 48 分钟。根据 Qi 标准，ROG Phone 8 Pro 支持最高 15 瓦的无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.13 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.82 / 0.96 / 1.19 Watt
Load midlight 7.3 / 7.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
5500 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
6000 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
19%
-19%
-4%
-12%
-23%
-24%
Idle Minimum *
0.82
0.5
39%
0.75
9%
0.63
23%
0.91
-11%
0.89
-9%
0.859 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=15)
-5%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-9%
Idle Average *
0.96
1.97
-105%
0.85
11%
1.47
-53%
1.63
-70%
1.05
-9%
1.231 ?(0.81 - 1.9, n=15)
-28%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-52%
Idle Maximum *
1.19
1.99
-67%
1.14
4%
1.55
-30%
1.67
-40%
1.11
7%
1.363 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=15)
-15%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-36%
Load Average *
7.3
3.36
54%
3.52
52%
8.45
-16%
2.61
64%
9.03
-24%
8.74 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=14)
-20%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
12%
Load Maximum *
7.3
10.43
-43%
6.01
18%
8.63
-18%
4.57
37%
9.06
-24%
10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=14)
-48%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-34%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.75 (1.202-7.76)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.2 (0.783-8.97)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.72 (0.673-0.822)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.732 (0.686-0.884)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.26 (7.22-7.29)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.87 (7.63-8.96)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.72 (0.673-0.822)
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.732 (0.686-0.884)

电池寿命

良好的电池续航能力是 ROG Phone 8 Pro 的一大特色。我们将显示屏亮度调至 150 cd/m²，模拟网上冲浪时，这款智能手机的续航时间达到了 15.5 小时。在连续循环播放视频时，它甚至能持续近 25 个小时。

总体而言，电池续航时间与同类产品相当。由于 ROG Phone 8 Pro 拒绝安装要求较低的 "稳定性测试"（我们将其作为标准配置），因此我们使用 "Burnout "基准测试作为替代方案进行测试。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
39h 37min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 20min
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
5500 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
6000 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh		Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
6500 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh
Battery Runtime
70%
54%
-7%
26%
12%
3%
Reader / Idle
2377
3514
48%
2448
3%
1344
-43%
2580
9%
1998
-16%
H.264
1497
2013
34%
1554
4%
1122
-25%
1249
-17%
1437
-4%
WiFi v1.3
929
1163
25%
1050
13%
760
-18%
1074
16%
1036
12%
897
-3%
Load
140
384
174%
412
194%
220
57%
276
97%
189
35%

Pros

+ 通过 ip68 认证的高质量外壳
+ 后盖上有显示迷你屏
+ 速度极快
+ Android 14 年和 4 年更新
+ WiFi 7，多种 4G 和 5G 频率
+ 可安装主动风扇
+ 非常明亮的 OLED 显示屏
+ 165 Hz 的 LTPO 面板
+ 良好的立体声扬声器
+ 附加触摸传感器
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 温度会很高
- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- 摄像头仅高于平均水平

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 的评价

回顾：华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro。测试设备由华硕德国公司提供。
回顾：华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro。测试设备由华硕德国公司提供。

ROG Phone 8 Pro 是一款非常可靠的智能手机，功能极其全面，令人印象深刻。其亮点包括快如闪电的 骁龙 8 代 3、最大 24 GB 内存和 1 TB 存储空间、WiFi 7、超长电池续航时间以及 OLED LTPO 显示屏（可达 2500 cd/m²，并可在 1 Hz 和 165 Hz 之间流畅调节帧频）。

华硕的高端智能手机正在开辟新天地，因为与前代产品不同，它不再是一款纯粹的游戏智能手机，而是凭借精致的外观和改进的硬件吸引了更广泛的目标群体。此外，它的高品质玻璃外壳明显变得更薄、更轻，而且还通过了 IP68 防尘防水认证。尽管如此，ROG Phone 8 Pro 仍具有游戏基因，并将继续很好地履行其作为游戏智能手机的职责。

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 成功地实现了游戏智能手机和高端手机之间的平衡。不过，它的价格并不便宜。

一些缺点阻碍了 ROG Phone 8 Pro 获得最高荣誉。最大的诟病在于，它的摄像头无法与其他高端智能手机相媲美，充其量只能说是刚刚超过平均水平。此外，还缺少激活 eSIM 卡的选项。除此之外，ROG Phone 8 Pro 还有很多不足之处。

华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 的替代产品包括 努比亚红魔 9 Pro，其性能与华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 相当，而且同样面向游戏。小米 14 Pro 小米 14 Pro与努比亚 RedMagic 9 Pro 性能相似，售价不到 800 美元。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

在华硕的网上商店如果您选择 16GB 内存和 512GB 存储空间，华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 的售价为 1199 美元。我们的评测设备版本配备 24 GB 内存和 1 TB 存储空间，售价为 1499 美元。在我们进行评测时，这款智能手机还没有进入亚马逊等其他零售商的销售渠道。

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro - 02/08/2024 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
74 / 70 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
92%
Games Performance
80 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
71%
Average
85%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 评测：从游戏智能手机到高端智能手机
Manuel Masiero, 2024-02-13 (Update: 2024-08-15)