Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Razr 2022评测--可折叠手机的妥协少了很多

2005年必须要做的事--而今天呢?

更多的摄像头,更大的电池,高端的SoC,而且还更便宜--摩托罗拉的Razr 2022乍一看似乎比它的直接前辈要复杂得多。在这里看看这款可折叠智能手机在测试中是否也能说服我们。
5G Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone
摩托罗拉Razr 2022
Motorola Razr 2022
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 2nd display: 2.7 inches, 800x573 pixel, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 236 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B14/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n77/​n78/​n79) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 167 x 79.8
Battery
3500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 30W charging (Motorola TurboPower)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, OIS, LED-flash, video @4320p/​30fps (Kamera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle (Kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, video @1080p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.990W/​kg (head), 1.370W/​kg (body); IP52-certified; dimensions closed: 86.5x79.8x17mm, fanless
Weight
200 g
Price
1200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

rating
date
model
weight
drive
size
resolution
price from
87 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Motorola Razr 2022
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
200 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
76.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2020
Motorola Razr 2019
SD 710, Adreno 616
205 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.20"2142x876
87.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2640x1080
86.3 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
262 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.02"2160x1914

箱子和设备 - 下巴不见了

2005年左右,摩托罗拉Razr V3是所有人都想拥有的翻盖手机。难怪它仍然是有史以来最畅销的手机之一。

由于现代人对智能手机的要求,摩托罗拉Razr 2022不能像以前那样紧凑,但它的可折叠显示屏绝对也很特别。前代产品 Razr 2019有其困难,但仍然发挥了一定的魅力。让我们看看摩托罗拉在其继任者身上有什么改进。

外壳没有典型的下巴,这在第一代Razr机型中已经存在,这也使得 Razr 2019仍然有。Razr 2022比它的前辈略轻,而且宽得多,所以它总体上提供了更多的屏幕空间。折叠时,它的厚度约为1.8厘米,宽度和长度约为8×8.5厘米。因此,它在口袋里的体积比其他智能手机要大,但也适合放在较小的口袋里。

摩托罗拉从根本上重新设计了铰链,它现在完全无声,看起来比前代产品更坚固,即使在半开状态下也能保持显示屏稳定,所以你可以用三脚架自拍,比如说。

现在的框架是由铝制成的,外壳由耐腐蚀的大猩猩玻璃5保护。

这款手机配备了256GB的大容量存储,价格略低于1200欧元,比发布时的前代产品便宜300欧元,还能提供两倍的存储空间。用于内存扩展的microSD读卡器仍然无法使用。然而,如果手机是从零售商处购买的,则可以插入2张SIM卡。

摩托罗拉Razr 2022
摩托罗拉Razr 2022
摩托罗拉Razr 2022
摩托罗拉Razr 2022
摩托罗拉Razr 2022

尺寸比较

172 mm 72 mm 6.9 mm 205 g167 mm 79.8 mm 7.6 mm 200 g165.2 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g161.6 mm 144.7 mm 5.4 mm 262 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信、软件和操作 - 最后是WiFi 6E和5G

今天的标准WiFi 6E和5G终于在Razr 2022中出现了;前代产品在发布时对于高端手机来说已经过时了。然而,现在可以通过Wi-Fi获得非常快的互联网,我们在使用参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000进行测试后可以确认这一点。然而,在传输过程中,数据速率的波动相当大。

支持众多5G和4G频率,所以你可以用摩托罗拉的Razr 2022轻松访问全球移动互联网。

制造商安装了非常纯粹的Android 12,没有广告应用程序。在测试时,安全补丁是从2022年12月开始的,仍然是相当最新的。摩托罗拉承诺在2025年10月之前提供安全补丁,并至少升级到Android 13。很好:你可以随时在摩托罗拉网站上检查进一步的更新状态.

由于良好的滑行性能和高达144赫兹的帧率,摩托罗拉手机的大触摸屏可以非常准确和快速地操作。即使是主显示屏在折叠时出现的折痕,在使用数日后也仅有极少的察觉,并不令人讨厌。由于帧率较低,外屏的操作速度有点慢。这可能也是由于与快速主屏幕的直接比较。然而,它可以可靠地操作,并可以作为一个完整的副显示屏使用。

解锁可以通过脸部解锁实现,在手机关闭和打开时都可以使用。指纹传感器也可用于生物识别用户。它隐藏在外壳右侧的待机按钮中,因此在关闭状态下也可以解锁。手机的解锁非常可靠,没有延迟。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Razr 2019
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
619 (447min - 657max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Razr 2019
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
569 (236min - 657max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
927 (450min - 953max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
915 (858min - 945max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
908 (886min - 924max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
808 (737min - 839max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Motorola Razr 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1496 (1074min - 1634max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Motorola Razr 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1139 (927min - 1318max) MBit/s
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Motorola Razr 2022; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1496 (1074-1634)
Motorola Razr 2022; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1139 (927-1318)

相机 - 良好,但不完美

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

两年前,前辈不得不使用蹩脚的1600万像素单摄像头,而摩托罗拉在Razr 2022中安装了更适合价格的双摄像头,用Omnivision OV50A作为主传感器,用Hynix HI336作为广角摄像头。

Razr 2022的主传感器不能完全跟上iPhone 14的细节清晰度。 iPhone 14在我们的测试照片中,Razr 2022的主传感器不能完全跟上iPhone 14的细节清晰度,但它在白天拍摄的照片总体上非常好,但仍然需要更多的对比度。许多细节在弱光下仍能显示出来,但亮度只是一般。来自广角摄像头的照片在细节上看起来非常冲淡,但传感器很好地补偿了图片边缘的失真。

在实验室里,主摄像头的色彩还原在良好的光线下有点太亮了。测试的图像非常清晰,甚至在边缘也是如此。

视频可以用8K录制,最高30帧/秒,广角摄像头被限制为4K。曝光调整工作很快,但自动对焦可以更精确一些;有时你可以看到它在短暂地抽动。

手机内部有一个摄像头,可以拍摄漂亮的自拍照。作为一项特殊功能,你也可以用主摄像头自拍,并将外侧的显示屏作为取景器。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle
ColorChecker
21 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
17 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
17 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Razr 2022: 11.61 ∆E min: 3.4 - max: 21.6 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.6 ∆E
20 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
25 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Razr 2022: 20.83 ∆E min: 10.68 - max: 31.81 ∆E

显示屏 - 更亮、更大、更宽

子像素结构
子像素结构

摩托罗拉Razr 2022的显示屏要大得多,尤其是比前代产品更宽,而且分辨率也更高:它现在提供2400 x 1080像素的扩展全高清。此外,它的亮度也更高,达到495cd/m²,比Razr 2019的亮度高很多。 Razr 2019.然而,它在这一领域无法与三星或小米的竞争对手相提并论。

144赫兹的高帧率也是可能的,这意味着屏幕上的运动显示得更流畅,系统对输入的反应更直接。

我们测量了在非常低的亮度下的PWM闪烁,但这可以通过 "防止闪烁 "设置减少到刷新率,所以它应该不那么令人讨厌。

我们喜欢色彩再现,我们在测试中用CalMAN软件和分光光度计确定。在灰阶中,肉眼看不到偏色。

外显示屏的分辨率为800 x 573像素,它也是触摸式的,大多数应用程序可以直接在这里启动,所以你也可以播放YouTube视频,例如。

489
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 501 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 495.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.202
Motorola Razr 2022
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Razr 2019
P-OLED, 2142x876, 6.2"
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Dynamic AMOLED , 2640x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
OLED, 2160x1914, 8"
Response Times
-537%
-74%
-119%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.2 ?(0.53, 0.59)
7 ?(3, 4)
-483%
1.41 ?(0.7205, 0.687)
-18%
2.97 ?(1.455, 1.518)
-148%
Response Time Black / White *
0.69 ?(0.35, 0.34)
8 ?(5, 3)
-1059%
1.52 ?(0.7865, 0.7325)
-120%
1.56 ?(0.8145, 0.745)
-126%
PWM Frequency
745
231.5
-69%
120
-84%
120
-84%
Screen
-74%
45%
45%
Brightness middle
500
428
-14%
795
59%
1015
103%
Brightness
495
428
-14%
800
62%
1022
106%
Brightness Distribution
98
89
-9%
97
-1%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.99
6.39
-221%
1
50%
1.6
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.37
10.83
-102%
2.5
53%
3.4
37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
5
-85%
1.5
44%
2.6
4%
Gamma
2.202 100%
2.25 98%
2.37 93%
2.22 99%
CCT
6663 98%
7649 85%
6466 101%
6506 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-306% / -228%
-15% / 5%
-37% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.35 ms rise
↘ 0.34 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.53 ms rise
↘ 0.59 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 745 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 745 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 745 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率大,但节流严重

Razr 2022终于得到了一个真正的高端SoC,即 高通Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.这使得这款蛤壳手机的性能与同价位的其他高端手机相当。前代产品只有一个好的中端SoC,在基准测试中远远落后。

在高负荷下高达45.3℃,摩托罗拉的Razr 2022会变得非常热,特别是在摄像头周围的区域,触摸屏上的发热比外面更明显。在3DMark压力测试中,我们还看到在长时间的负载下,性能损失明显,最高可达50%。

Razr 2022配备了立体声扬声器,但由于空间有限,它们的声音并不大,很快就显得力不从心,总体而言,对于一款高端手机来说,声音只能算一般。耳机可以通过USB-C或蓝牙连接。后者有大量的编解码器可用,包括LDHC和aptX TWS+。

电池比前代的3,500毫安时大得多。然而,运行时间爱好者不会满意,因为在我们的WLAN测试中,9:25小时的时间明显好于前代产品,但对于智能手机来说,总体上是相当平庸的。你应该在低负载的情况下度过一天,但几乎没有任何储备。

这款手机的充电功率高达30瓦,但需要不到2个小时就能将小电池完全充电。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1324 Points +1%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1305 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=25)
1281 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1265 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points -22%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
394 Points -70%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4237 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=25)
4167 Points +1%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4106 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3987 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points -17%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1448 Points -65%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
15443 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 20841, n=24)
15090 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14611 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13195 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13077 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (9166 - 13386, n=17)
11815 Points +9%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10823 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9166 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 22303, n=160, last 2 years)
7934 Points -27%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2006 Points -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20220 Points +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (13986 - 20955, n=17)
18955 Points +31%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14418 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
13986 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33560, n=160, last 2 years)
11805 Points -18%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1866 Points -87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5847 Points +1%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
5780 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3224 - 6030, n=17)
5182 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10259, n=160, last 2 years)
4663 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4211 Points -27%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2720 Points -53%
Wild Life Score
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
8130 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (7433 - 8167, n=4)
7957 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=109, last 2 years)
2859 Points -65%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
11201 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11022 Points 0%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
11004 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8294 - 11201, n=23)
10859 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 22004, n=182, last 2 years)
7761 Points -29%
Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2867 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2811 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2795 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (2001 - 2873, n=24)
2730 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=189, last 2 years)
2134 Points -24%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2798 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2745 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2726 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1947 - 2899, n=24)
2682 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=187, last 2 years)
2127 Points -23%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
82 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (51 - 104, n=24)
79 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
63 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)
51.6 fps -37%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
51 fps -38%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
17 fps -79%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (71 - 138, n=24)
112.2 fps +34%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
106 fps +26%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
84 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)
82.4 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
71 fps -15%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps -83%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
65 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
62 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (31 - 86, n=24)
57.4 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
38.5 fps -41%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
32 fps -51%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
11 fps -83%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (34 - 52, n=26)
44.2 fps +19%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
39 fps +5%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
37 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
34 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)
33.2 fps -10%
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5.2 fps -86%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
52566 Points +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (17622 - 61536, n=24)
42193 Points +85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points +66%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
29168 Points +28%
Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
22761 Points
Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
9771 Points -57%
Motorola Razr 2022Motorola Razr 2019Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5GXiaomi Mix Fold 2Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-76%
-13%
26%
-3%
4%
Sequential Read 256KB
1768
510
-71%
1598.77
-10%
1882.11
6%
Sequential Write 256KB
1149
186.4
-84%
987.09
-14%
1783.27
55%
Random Read 4KB
315
88.6
-72%
308.23
-2%
342.67
9%
Random Write 4KB
332
80.1
-76%
245.94
-26%
446.48
34%

温度

Max. Load
 44.8 °C34.2 °C29.3 °C 
 45.3 °C32.3 °C29.1 °C 
 45.3 °C32.6 °C29.6 °C 
Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 35.8 °C
26.8 °C32.6 °C41.6 °C
28.2 °C34.9 °C41.7 °C
28.4 °C33.2 °C43.7 °C
Maximum: 43.7 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 19.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11.4 (9.59-17)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (15.9-16.7)
Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø39.7 (31.4-63.9)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.4 (29.3-64.7)

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.534.6253530.53132.125.74032.530.45036.632.76330.330.5803122.110025.728.112525.636.116023.942.620019.746.125017.451.3315195540016.860.650017.863.263017.861.680022.667100022.671.912502266160021.561.3200021.965.2250020.672.731501773.5400016.273.8500015.47363001565.2800015.360.21000015.8661250016.560.81600017.464.7SPL31.781.9N1.549.8median 17.8median 63.2Delta2.9637.538.826.330.623.725.435.926.33637.324.923.820.423.218.525.716.931.217.946.31646.414.15312.259.513.357.810.967.912.366.712.168.212.571.911.872.511.972.612.471.212.871.313.1721373.113.275.313.675.413.670.813.765.81458.513.862.225840.659.3median 13.2median 67.91.68.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Razr 2022Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Razr 2022 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=204, last 2 years)
985 min +74%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
3700 mAh
657 min +16%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
4500 mAh
567 min 0%
Motorola Razr 2022
3500 mAh
565 min
Motorola Razr 2019
2510 mAh
469 min -17%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
9h 25min

Pros

+ 非常高的性能
+ 高质量的工艺
+ 快速记忆
+ 伟大、灵活的概念

Cons

- 平庸的扬声器
- 耐用性不确定
- 发热强烈
- 电池寿命相对较短
- 没有无线充电

结论 - 最终适合日常使用

在审查中。摩托罗拉Razr 2022。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供。
在审查中。摩托罗拉Razr 2022。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供。

摩托罗拉Razr 2022在许多方面都比上一代产品有了巨大的飞跃:制造质量更好,功率更大,运行时间更长,相机升级,最后还有现代通信标准。而所有这些都可以用更少的钱买到。

电池运行时间仍然无法跟上刚性的高端手机,而且你还必须忍受明显的暖气。

折叠装置的寿命,特别是屏幕的寿命仍然是一个黑匣子:尽管技术已经有了很大的改进,但没有人能够保证几年后手机是否还能完美无缺地工作。

另一方面,Razr以其折叠机制所产生的魅力也不应被低估。如果你喜欢特别的东西,你会喜欢这个概念,它可能还不完美,但已经得到了全面的改进。

摩托罗拉Razr 2022与它的前辈相比已经有了很大的改进,现在是一款真正好的可折叠智能手机,而且价格合理。

随着所有的升级,这款可折叠手机在与(可控的)竞争对手的竞争中也变得更有竞争力: Galaxy Z Flip4仍然有点便宜,但不提供WiFi 6E,而且使用较慢的USB端口。前代产品 Razr 2019几乎没有了,但它只值得以很低的价格购买,而且如果你能接受它的限制。

价格和可用性

amazon.de,直接从制造商那里你可以得到摩托罗拉Razr 2022与256 GB的大容量存储,制造商的价格略低于1,200欧元。在cyberport.de你甚至可以在测试时节省几欧元,只需支付不到1150欧元。

Motorola Razr 2022 - 01/11/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 75%
Weight
88%
Battery
88%
Display
89%
Games Performance
61 / 64 → 95%
Application Performance
82 / 86 → 95%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
79%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Razr 2022评测--可折叠手机的妥协少了很多
Florian Schmitt, 2023-01-13 (Update: 2023-01-13)