摩托罗拉Razr 2022评测--可折叠手机的妥协少了很多
潜在的竞争对手比较
rating | date | model | weight | drive | size | resolution | price from |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Motorola Razr 2022 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 200 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
76.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Motorola Razr 2019 SD 710, Adreno 616 | 205 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.20" | 2142x876 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 187 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2640x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 262 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 8.02" | 2160x1914 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子和设备 - 下巴不见了
2005年左右,摩托罗拉Razr V3是所有人都想拥有的翻盖手机。难怪它仍然是有史以来最畅销的手机之一。
由于现代人对智能手机的要求,摩托罗拉Razr 2022不能像以前那样紧凑,但它的可折叠显示屏绝对也很特别。前代产品 Razr 2019有其困难,但仍然发挥了一定的魅力。让我们看看摩托罗拉在其继任者身上有什么改进。
外壳没有典型的下巴,这在第一代Razr机型中已经存在,这也使得 Razr 2019仍然有。Razr 2022比它的前辈略轻,而且宽得多,所以它总体上提供了更多的屏幕空间。折叠时,它的厚度约为1.8厘米,宽度和长度约为8×8.5厘米。因此,它在口袋里的体积比其他智能手机要大,但也适合放在较小的口袋里。
摩托罗拉从根本上重新设计了铰链,它现在完全无声,看起来比前代产品更坚固,即使在半开状态下也能保持显示屏稳定,所以你可以用三脚架自拍,比如说。
现在的框架是由铝制成的,外壳由耐腐蚀的大猩猩玻璃5保护。
这款手机配备了256GB的大容量存储,价格略低于1200欧元,比发布时的前代产品便宜300欧元,还能提供两倍的存储空间。用于内存扩展的microSD读卡器仍然无法使用。然而,如果手机是从零售商处购买的,则可以插入2张SIM卡。
通信、软件和操作 - 最后是WiFi 6E和5G
今天的标准WiFi 6E和5G终于在Razr 2022中出现了;前代产品在发布时对于高端手机来说已经过时了。然而,现在可以通过Wi-Fi获得非常快的互联网,我们在使用参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000进行测试后可以确认这一点。然而,在传输过程中,数据速率的波动相当大。
支持众多5G和4G频率,所以你可以用摩托罗拉的Razr 2022轻松访问全球移动互联网。
制造商安装了非常纯粹的Android 12,没有广告应用程序。在测试时,安全补丁是从2022年12月开始的,仍然是相当最新的。摩托罗拉承诺在2025年10月之前提供安全补丁,并至少升级到Android 13。很好:你可以随时在摩托罗拉网站上检查进一步的更新状态.
由于良好的滑行性能和高达144赫兹的帧率,摩托罗拉手机的大触摸屏可以非常准确和快速地操作。即使是主显示屏在折叠时出现的折痕,在使用数日后也仅有极少的察觉,并不令人讨厌。由于帧率较低,外屏的操作速度有点慢。这可能也是由于与快速主屏幕的直接比较。然而,它可以可靠地操作,并可以作为一个完整的副显示屏使用。
解锁可以通过脸部解锁实现,在手机关闭和打开时都可以使用。指纹传感器也可用于生物识别用户。它隐藏在外壳右侧的待机按钮中,因此在关闭状态下也可以解锁。手机的解锁非常可靠,没有延迟。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Motorola Razr 2019 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Motorola Razr 2019 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Motorola Razr 2022 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Motorola Razr 2022 |
相机 - 良好,但不完美
两年前,前辈不得不使用蹩脚的1600万像素单摄像头,而摩托罗拉在Razr 2022中安装了更适合价格的双摄像头,用Omnivision OV50A作为主传感器,用Hynix HI336作为广角摄像头。
Razr 2022的主传感器不能完全跟上iPhone 14的细节清晰度。 iPhone 14在我们的测试照片中,Razr 2022的主传感器不能完全跟上iPhone 14的细节清晰度,但它在白天拍摄的照片总体上非常好,但仍然需要更多的对比度。许多细节在弱光下仍能显示出来,但亮度只是一般。来自广角摄像头的照片在细节上看起来非常冲淡,但传感器很好地补偿了图片边缘的失真。
在实验室里,主摄像头的色彩还原在良好的光线下有点太亮了。测试的图像非常清晰,甚至在边缘也是如此。
视频可以用8K录制,最高30帧/秒,广角摄像头被限制为4K。曝光调整工作很快,但自动对焦可以更精确一些;有时你可以看到它在短暂地抽动。
手机内部有一个摄像头,可以拍摄漂亮的自拍照。作为一项特殊功能,你也可以用主摄像头自拍,并将外侧的显示屏作为取景器。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle显示屏 - 更亮、更大、更宽
摩托罗拉Razr 2022的显示屏要大得多,尤其是比前代产品更宽,而且分辨率也更高:它现在提供2400 x 1080像素的扩展全高清。此外,它的亮度也更高,达到495cd/m²,比Razr 2019的亮度高很多。 Razr 2019.然而,它在这一领域无法与三星或小米的竞争对手相提并论。
144赫兹的高帧率也是可能的,这意味着屏幕上的运动显示得更流畅,系统对输入的反应更直接。
我们测量了在非常低的亮度下的PWM闪烁,但这可以通过 "防止闪烁 "设置减少到刷新率,所以它应该不那么令人讨厌。
我们喜欢色彩再现,我们在测试中用CalMAN软件和分光光度计确定。在灰阶中,肉眼看不到偏色。
外显示屏的分辨率为800 x 573像素,它也是触摸式的,大多数应用程序可以直接在这里启动,所以你也可以播放YouTube视频,例如。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.202
Motorola Razr 2022 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Razr 2019 P-OLED, 2142x876, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Dynamic AMOLED , 2640x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 OLED, 2160x1914, 8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -537% | -74% | -119% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.2 ? | 7 ? -483% | 1.41 ? -18% | 2.97 ? -148% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.69 ? | 8 ? -1059% | 1.52 ? -120% | 1.56 ? -126% |
PWM Frequency | 745 | 231.5 -69% | 120 -84% | 120 -84% |
Screen | -74% | 45% | 45% | |
Brightness middle | 500 | 428 -14% | 795 59% | 1015 103% |
Brightness | 495 | 428 -14% | 800 62% | 1022 106% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 89 -9% | 97 -1% | 98 0% |
Black Level * | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.99 | 6.39 -221% | 1 50% | 1.6 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.37 | 10.83 -102% | 2.5 53% | 3.4 37% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 5 -85% | 1.5 44% | 2.6 4% |
Gamma | 2.202 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.37 93% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6663 98% | 7649 85% | 6466 101% | 6506 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -306% /
-228% | -15% /
5% | -37% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.35 ms rise | |
↘ 0.34 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.53 ms rise | |
↘ 0.59 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 745 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 745 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 745 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率大,但节流严重
Razr 2022终于得到了一个真正的高端SoC,即 高通Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.这使得这款蛤壳手机的性能与同价位的其他高端手机相当。前代产品只有一个好的中端SoC,在基准测试中远远落后。
在高负荷下高达45.3℃,摩托罗拉的Razr 2022会变得非常热,特别是在摄像头周围的区域,触摸屏上的发热比外面更明显。在3DMark压力测试中,我们还看到在长时间的负载下,性能损失明显,最高可达50%。
Razr 2022配备了立体声扬声器,但由于空间有限,它们的声音并不大,很快就显得力不从心,总体而言,对于一款高端手机来说,声音只能算一般。耳机可以通过USB-C或蓝牙连接。后者有大量的编解码器可用,包括LDHC和aptX TWS+。
电池比前代的3,500毫安时大得多。然而,运行时间爱好者不会满意,因为在我们的WLAN测试中,9:25小时的时间明显好于前代产品,但对于智能手机来说,总体上是相当平庸的。你应该在低负载的情况下度过一天,但几乎没有任何储备。
这款手机的充电功率高达30瓦,但需要不到2个小时就能将小电池完全充电。
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Razr 2022 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (51 - 104, n=24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 | |
Motorola Razr 2019 | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (71 - 138, n=24) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 | |
Motorola Razr 2022 | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Motorola Razr 2019 | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Razr 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (31 - 86, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 | |
Motorola Razr 2019 | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (34 - 52, n=26) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 | |
Motorola Razr 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Razr 2019 |
Motorola Razr 2022 | Motorola Razr 2019 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -76% | -13% | 26% | -3% | 4% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1768 | 510 -71% | 1598.77 -10% | 1882.11 6% | 1749 ? -1% | 1867 ? 6% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 1149 | 186.4 -84% | 987.09 -14% | 1783.27 55% | 1163 ? 1% | 1451 ? 26% |
Random Read 4KB | 315 | 88.6 -72% | 308.23 -2% | 342.67 9% | 286 ? -9% | 279 ? -11% |
Random Write 4KB | 332 | 80.1 -76% | 245.94 -26% | 446.48 34% | 319 ? -4% | 311 ? -6% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Motorola Razr 2022 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 | |
Motorola Razr 2022 | |
Motorola Razr 2019 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 最终适合日常使用
摩托罗拉Razr 2022在许多方面都比上一代产品有了巨大的飞跃:制造质量更好,功率更大,运行时间更长,相机升级,最后还有现代通信标准。而所有这些都可以用更少的钱买到。
电池运行时间仍然无法跟上刚性的高端手机,而且你还必须忍受明显的暖气。
折叠装置的寿命,特别是屏幕的寿命仍然是一个黑匣子:尽管技术已经有了很大的改进,但没有人能够保证几年后手机是否还能完美无缺地工作。
另一方面,Razr以其折叠机制所产生的魅力也不应被低估。如果你喜欢特别的东西,你会喜欢这个概念,它可能还不完美,但已经得到了全面的改进。
摩托罗拉Razr 2022与它的前辈相比已经有了很大的改进,现在是一款真正好的可折叠智能手机,而且价格合理。
随着所有的升级,这款可折叠手机在与(可控的)竞争对手的竞争中也变得更有竞争力: Galaxy Z Flip4仍然有点便宜,但不提供WiFi 6E,而且使用较慢的USB端口。前代产品 Razr 2019几乎没有了,但它只值得以很低的价格购买,而且如果你能接受它的限制。
价格和可用性
在amazon.de或,直接从制造商那里你可以得到摩托罗拉Razr 2022与256 GB的大容量存储,制造商的价格略低于1,200欧元。在cyberport.de你甚至可以在测试时节省几欧元,只需支付不到1150欧元。
Motorola Razr 2022
- 01/11/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt