Realme 11 Pro+ 评测--高品质智能手机中的 2 亿像素摄像头
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Realme 11 Pro+ Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4 | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2412x1080 | |
| 83.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Realme 11 Pro Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4 | 191 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2412x1080 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | OnePlus Nord 3 Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10 | 193.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.74" | 2772x1240 | |
| 87.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Google Pixel 7a Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7 | 193.5 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2400x1080 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4 | 210.5 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
机箱和设备--轻型底盘彰显意大利风情
我们已经对realme 11 Pro的详细介绍。Plus 版配备了更好的相机系统，主摄像头像素达 2 亿，配备广角镜头，并可根据要求增加存储空间，附加费用约为 100 欧元（约合 100 美元）。配备 512 GB 存储空间和 12 GB 内存的顶级机型出厂价约为 520 欧元。
尽管增加了功能，但 realme 11 Pro+ 189 克的重量甚至比 11 Pro和同价位的其他手机相比还要轻一些，不过，例如 谷歌 Pixel 7a在尺寸上要小巧得多。
我们的测试设备采用日出米色，合成皮革背壳，由意大利设计师马特奥-梅诺托（Matteo Menotto）设计。加上圆形的摄像头模块，这款手机看起来非常别致和与众不同。如果你喜欢更内敛的外观，这款手机还有纯黑色可供选择。机身制造简洁，看起来非常有质感。不过，由于没有 IP 认证，因此 realme 11 Pro+ 不宜带入水中。
realme 手机没有 microSD 读卡器，但安装了 NFC，因此可以与附近的设备通信，并使用 Google Pay 等移动支付服务。
通信、软件和操作 - 更新周期相当短
WLAN 标准安装了 WiFi 6，realme 11 Pro+ 的平均数据传输速率可达 721 至 782 Mbps。千兆线路虽然不能完全利用，但数据传输的整体速度还是非常快的。该价位的其他手机通常能达到更高的数据传输速率：谷歌 谷歌 Pixel 7a为例，它还可以使用占用率较低的 6 GHz 频段。
在移动网络方面支持 5G，但 realme 11 Pro+ 不得不在频率分集方面做出一些让步。
软件基于Android 13，名为 realmeUI 4。在测试时，安全补丁是从 2023 年 7 月开始的，因此相当及时。制造商承诺仍将为手机提供Android 14 和 15，并在 2026 年之前提供安全更新。手机预装了许多第三方应用程序和游戏。不需要的用户必须先进行清理。
手机通过了 Widevine 认证，因此可以欣赏到流媒体提供商提供的全质量视频。
触摸屏非常灵敏，即使在角落也能轻松使用。它的显示速度高达每秒 120 帧，这意味着对输入的响应也非常迅速。指纹传感器隐形集成在屏幕后面，位置非常靠下，即使是小手也能轻松触及。解锁时只有极小的延迟。
也可以使用面部数据进行生物识别解锁，但由于使用的是纯二维照片，因此安全性不高。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| OnePlus Nord 3 | |
| Google Pixel 7a | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
| Realme 11 Pro+ | |
| Realme 11 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| OnePlus Nord 3 | |
| Google Pixel 7a | |
| Realme 11 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
| Realme 11 Pro+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Google Pixel 7a | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Google Pixel 7a | |
摄像头 - realme 11 Pro+ 带来更多灵活性
与 realme 11 Pro最大的区别在于相机系统：Plus 机型的主摄像头像素为 2 亿，感光度略高。此外，还配备了光学图像稳定器。照片的特写虚化效果不错，但细节和清晰度终究不如高端相机。
在光线很暗和对比度很高的情况下，有不错的增亮效果，但与更昂贵的相机系统相比还差得很远。在暗处尤其缺乏绘画效果。
广角摄像头在 realme 11 Pro中配备了广角摄像头，但只有 Plus 才有。它拍摄的快照效果不错，但放大后几乎看不到细节。阴天时的亮度也相当一般。
背面的第三个镜头是一个分辨率相当低的微距摄像头，也只能用于拍摄不宜放大太多的快照。
前置摄像头为 3200 万像素，在弱光环境下的拍摄效果不是特别好。在光线较好的情况下，自拍效果还算不错，但在细节方面，尤其是暗处的动态效果方面，我们发现放大后的效果较弱。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide angle
显示屏 - AMOLED 屏幕，亮度良好
与同价位产品一样，realme 11 Pro+ 也采用了基于 AMOLED 技术的全高清屏幕。在这里，每个二极管都会自行点亮，也可以完全关闭，因此无需背光，理论上可以显示全黑。
最大亮度为平均 779 cd/m²，处于良好水平，但还不足以呈现 HDR 内容。在 "自然 "模式下，色彩还原非常准确，我们最多只能在灰阶中发现极少的偏绿。
尽管 realme 宣称，在环境光线较弱的情况下，用于调暗屏幕的 PWM 频率最高可达 2,180 Hz，因此不会对眼睛造成伤害，但我们测得的数值却明显偏低。对于普通用户来说，这些数值仍在正常范围内，但敏感人群应在购买前试用屏幕。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 779 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.269
| Realme 11 Pro+ AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7" | Realme 11 Pro AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7" | OnePlus Nord 3 AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7" | Google Pixel 7a OLED, 2400x1080, 6.1" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 11% | -225% | -48% | -1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.6 ? | 1.9 ? -19% | 0.93 ? 42% | 3.1 ? -94% | 1 ? 37% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.6 ? | 1.3 ? 19% | 12.8 ? -700% | 1.58 ? 1% | 1.1 ? 31% |
| PWM Frequency | 439 | 577.4 32% | 366.58 ? -16% | 218 -50% | 121 -72% |
| Screen | 7% | -3% | 34% | 32% | |
| Brightness middle | 779 | 772 -1% | 481 -38% | 1006 29% | 942 21% |
| Brightness | 756 | 764 1% | 478 -37% | 1010 34% | 939 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 97 3% | 91 -3% | 95 1% | 94 0% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.72 9% | 1.4 26% | 1.1 42% | 1.05 45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.38 | 3.83 13% | 3.87 12% | 2.5 43% | 2.65 39% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 2.7 18% | 2.6 21% | 1.5 55% | 1.2 64% |
| Gamma | 2.269 97% | 2.252 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.263 97% |
| CCT | 6558 99% | 6621 98% | 6395 102% | 6531 100% | 6477 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
8% | -114% /
-77% | -7% /
7% | 16% /
21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 439 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 439 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 439 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 可快速充电
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 7050是一款适用于中端手机的 SoC，但在 500 欧元左右的价格范围内，它无法与许多其他设备相媲美。因此，一款 谷歌 Pixel 7a或 一加 Nord 3要强大得多。
图形性能也要低得多，在要求较高的游戏中往往只能达到 30 fps。在日常使用中，realme 11 Pro+ 可以流畅地执行大多数应用程序，即使偶尔进行多任务处理也问题不大。只有在对性能有较高要求时，你才会注意到两者之间的差异。
46.3 °C 的最高温度相当高，尤其是我们是在室温下测量的。不过，它的选择性很强，在日常使用中可能很少达到。即使在长时间高负荷运行的情况下，SoC 也只会出现非常轻微的节流。
声音系统由底部边缘的专用扬声器和听筒组成，听筒用作第二音源，可产生立体声效果。声音清晰，但有点高音偏重，因此音频爱好者可能会更期待连接外部设备：可通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙连接。
SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LHDC、aptX Adaptive 和 aptX TWS+ 可作为无线音频编解码器。
在我们的 WLAN 测试中，realme 11 Pro+ 的 5,000 mAh 电池可持续使用 13:49 小时，这在同类产品中是比较典型的。这一续航时间表明，在执行要求不高的任务时，手机可以使用一整天。如果您必须给手机充电，附带的 100 瓦电源可帮助缩短充电时间：最多 15 分钟即可将电池电量充至 50%，不到一小时即可充至 100%。
| Realme 11 Pro+ | Realme 11 Pro | OnePlus Nord 3 | Google Pixel 7a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | 11% | -16% | -25% | 3% | 4% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1891.9 | 1818 -4% | 1617.78 -14% | 1624.39 -14% | 977.8 -48% | 1846 ? -2% | 1867 ? -1% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1786.4 | 1233.6 -31% | 1525.8 -15% | 996.44 -44% | 912.5 -49% | 1199 ? -33% | 1451 ? -19% |
| Random Read 4KB | 249.4 | 233.6 -6% | 308.68 24% | 229.44 -8% | 250.9 1% | 282 ? 13% | 279 ? 12% |
| Random Write 4KB | 253.9 | 226.6 -11% | 376.9 48% | 263.81 4% | 243.3 -4% | 338 ? 33% | 311 ? 22% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Realme 11 Pro | |
| OnePlus Nord 3 | |
| Realme 11 Pro+ | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
| Google Pixel 7a | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
| Realme 11 Pro | |
| Realme 11 Pro+ | |
| OnePlus Nord 3 | |
| Google Pixel 7a | |
发言人
Realme 11 Pro+ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
| Realme 11 Pro+ | |
| Google Pixel 7a | |
| OnePlus Nord 3 | |
| Realme 11 Pro | |
Pros
Cons
评价--漂亮，但不那么强大
realme 11 Pro+ 的配置甚至比它的小兄弟更好一些 realme 11 Pro的广角镜头和感光度高、分辨率高的主摄像头为相机系统带来了更多灵活性。
简约或非常别致的外观也是这款手机的加分项，尤其是它拥有简洁而高品质的做工。不过，就价格而言，这款手机的性能并不像 realme 11 Pro- 在 500 欧元以上的价格区间，对性能的要求更高。你还可以看到一些手机的无线局域网速度更快。大多数制造商还提供更长的软件支持。
尽管如此，realme 11 Pro+ 仍能满足日常使用需求：由于充电速度快、运行时间长、屏幕亮度高、配件齐全，这款智能手机使用起来非常有趣。
realme 11 Pro+ 外观别致，具有灵活的相机系统、良好的运行时间和充足的存储空间。
性能更强的 OnePlus North 3或 谷歌 Pixel 7a.尤其是谷歌手机，定期提供的超长软件支持更是不容小觑。
价格和供应情况
例如，realme 11 Pro+ 在亚马逊（amazon.de）有售。在测试时，512 GB 机型的价格甚至降至 470 或 480 欧元，具体价格取决于不同颜色的机型。
Realme 11 Pro+
- 09/19/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
