Notebookcheck Logo

OnePlus Nord 3智能手机评测：近乎旗舰的体验，却不会让您破费

为中档车重新注入活力。

OnePlus Nord 3为竞争激烈的35,000欧元以下（500欧元以下）智能手机市场带来了一些急需的活力。Android 智能手机市场带来了一些急需的活力。虽然搭载Dimensity 9000处理器的Nord 3在几乎所有方面都比Nord 2有了大幅提升，但这款智能手机也存在一些明显的不足。
OnePlus 5G Smartphone Android
一加Nord 3评测

OnePlus Nord 3 G加入了该公司今年发布的一系列新产品的行列，其中包括 一加11, 11R, 一加Pad和Nord CE 3 Lite.

我们的OnePlus Nord 3设备采用了联发科Dimensity 9000SoC，配备16GB LPDDR5内存和256GB UFS 3.1存储空间，采用迷雾绿背板。该配置的售价为37,999英镑（约合463美元），而基本的8GB/128GB版本售价为33,999英镑（约合414美元）。

在欧洲，Nord 3的8GB/128GB版本起售价为449欧元，16GB/256GB版本售价为549欧元。欧洲的早鸟买家可以在7月31日前以499欧元的折扣价购买Nord 3 16 GB/256GB版本。

在本次评测中，我们将评估OnePlus Nord 3是否有能力在竞争激烈的中端Android 智能手机市场中脱颖而出。

OnePlus Nord 3 (Nord Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 8 x 1.8 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G710 MP10
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.74 inch 20:9, 2772 x 1240 pixel 451 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, Dragontrail glass, 40 Hz - 120 Hz Dynamic Refresh, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 256 GB UFS 3.1, 229 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, WCDMA: Bands 1/4/5/8, LTE-FDD: Bands 1/3/4/5/8/28A, LTE-TDD: Bands 34/38/39/40/41, 5G NR SA: N1/N3/N5/N8/N28A, 5G NR NSA: N1/N3/N41/N77/N78, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900, CDMA: BC0, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 162.6 x 75.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix IMX890 (f/1.8, 24 mm, 1/1.56", 1.0 µm, PDAF, OIS) + 8 MP IMX355 (f/2.2, 1/4", 112° ultra-wide) + 2 MP Macro (f/2.4), Dual LED flash, 4K 60 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps, 1080p 30 fps HDR, EIS, Camera2 API Support: Nil
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, 24 mm, 1.0 µm, Auto HDR, 1080p 30 fps, EIS
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, Protective case, 80 W SuperVOOC Power Adapter, USB Type-A to Type-C cable, Pre-applied screen protector, SIM tray ejector, Oxygen OS 13.1, 12 Months Warranty, IP54, Corning Gorilla Glass 5 (Back panel)SAR (India): 1.130 W/Kg (Head); 0.872 W/Kg (Body), Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
193.5 g, Power Supply: 168 g
Price
549 Euro
Links
OnePlus homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
OnePlus Nord 3
Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10		193.5 g8.1 mm6.74"2772x1240
87.9 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		196 g8.8 mm6.70"2400x1080
85.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L		193.5 g8.3 mm6.55"2400x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		202 g8.2 mm6.40"2340x1080
86.1 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core		144 g7.3 mm4.70"1334x750
86.8 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Motorola Edge 40
Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9		171 g7.49 mm6.55"2400x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L		181 g7.9 mm6.67"2400x1080

外壳：ip54防护等级，手感极佳

第一眼看上去，将Nord 3 5G与Nord CE 3 Lite区分开来很有难度。OnePlus推出的Nord 3有两种颜色可供选择：雾绿色（我们的机型）和暴风雨灰。

Nord 3采用了Dragontrail玻璃来保护屏幕，并预装了屏幕保护膜。手机（不带保护壳）从桌面高度跌落到瓷砖地板上数次，均未出现任何划痕或明显的损坏迹象。

Nord 3的光面背板容易沾染指纹。这款智能手机继续采用哑光塑料边框，就像其前代产品一样。 Nord 2和 Nord 2T但它仍然散发着高级感。

Nord 3的防尘防水等级为IP54。尽管重量约为194克，但由于重量分布均衡，Nord 3给人一种轻巧的感觉。

总体而言，Nord 3表现出扎实的制造质量，提供了愉悦的触感体验，即使在承受巨大压力时也依然坚固耐用。

尺寸比较

❌
163.1 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 196 g162.91 mm 76.03 mm 7.9 mm 181 g162.6 mm 75.1 mm 8.1 mm 193.5 g159.2 mm 75.8 mm 8.3 mm 193.5 g158.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 202 g158.43 mm 71.99 mm 7.49 mm 171 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 144 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

硬件板载警报滑块和红外爆破器

从积极的一面来看，它将标志性的警报滑块置于边框右侧，就在电源按钮上方。

在设备的顶部，您会发现一个红外爆破器，以及一个麦克风和一个扬声器出风口。左侧是音量摇杆。

移至底部，您会看到扬声器格栅和一个USB Type-C端口。该端口在内部只能以USB 2.0的速度运行，但支持OTG（On-The-Go）功能。

麦克风的位置与底部的sim卡托相邻，因此建议小心谨慎，以免误将弹出工具插入错误的孔中。

遗憾的是，Nord 3缺少microSD存储扩展选项，而在这个价位上，这可能是一个有价值的补充。

左: 音量摇杆
左: 音量摇杆
右侧电源按钮，警报滑块
右侧电源按钮，警报滑块
顶部：麦克风，红外热像仪，扬声器通风口
顶部：麦克风，红外热像仪，扬声器通风口
底部SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB 2.0 Type-C、扬声器
底部SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB 2.0 Type-C、扬声器

软件：Oxygen OS 13.1，三大更新Android

Nord 3 5G开箱即搭载Oxygen OS 13.1。截至发稿时的最新OTA更新捆绑了2023年6月的安全补丁。OnePlus承诺三年的Android OS更新和四年的安全更新。

尽管源于ColorOS，但Oxygen OS 13.1几乎没有臃肿的软件，在日常使用中感觉相当轻便。 预装的应用程序保持在最低水平，具有OnePlus惯用的应用程序，以及Netflix、Amazon Prime Video和Spotify等流行服务。

值得注意的是，OnePlus尚未解决在操作系统中保持120赫兹刷新率的老大难问题。例如，打开包括Play Store在内的任何谷歌应用，刷新率都会降至90 Hz，而执行照片编辑等任务时，刷新率会进一步降至60 Hz。

尽管如此，不同刷新率之间的转换是无缝进行的，没有任何明显的延迟或中断。Nord 3还通过了Widevine L1认证，可实现高分辨率DRM视频流。

通信和GNSS：快速Wi-Fi 6和精确导航

Dimensity 9000 SoC提供出色的Wi-Fi 6网络功能，在竞争中遥遥领先。在距离华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器1米的距离内，Wi-Fi吞吐量看起来相当稳定，视线清晰。

Networking: iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | iperf3 receive AXE11000
Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus Nord 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1488 (1308min - 1595max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
977 (487min - 997max) MBit/s -34%
Motorola Edge 40
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
942 (912min - 964max) MBit/s -37%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
898 (852min - 931max) MBit/s -40%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
888 (869min - 906max) MBit/s -40%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=122)
870 MBit/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
750 (546min - 831max) MBit/s -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=191, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s -51%
Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus Nord 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1581 (1484min - 1642max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
933 (833min - 949max) MBit/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
843 (813min - 856max) MBit/s -47%
Motorola Edge 40
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
839 (774min - 879max) MBit/s -47%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=120)
834 MBit/s -47%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
805 (686min - 905max) MBit/s -49%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
746 (599min - 768max) MBit/s -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=189, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s -55%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 3 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1487 (1308-1595)
Motorola Edge 40 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø942 (912-964)
OnePlus Nord 3 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1581 (1484-1642)
Motorola Edge 40 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø836 (774-879)
室内GNSS精度
室内GNSS精度
户外GNSS精度
户外GNSS精度
支持GPS卫星
支持GPS卫星

Nord 3支持GPS (L1)、BDS (B1、B1C)、GLONASS、GALILEO (E1)、QZSS (L1)和NavIC (L1)卫星星座导航。

该智能手机在室内难以快速捕捉到GNSS信号，但室外接收效果非常好。

与iPhone 14 Pro相比，GPS跟踪相当准确。 Apple iPhone 14 Pro相比，GPS跟踪相当准确，但在某些地方，我们确实看到两款设备都显示出穿过建筑物的导航功能。

导航试驾
导航试驾
GNSS 对比：Apple iPhone 14 Pro vs. OnePlus Nord 3
GNSS 对比：Apple iPhone 14 Pro vs. OnePlus Nord 3

电话和语音质量：通话声音不够大

虽然Nord 3不支持eSIM卡，但可以方便地使用两张实体nano SIM卡。完全支持LTE语音（VoLTE）和Wi-Fi通话。

我们在AirTel 5G网络上进行测试时没有遇到任何接收问题。不过，我们注意到，即使在最高设置下，通话音量似乎也低于预期。免提电话的音量似乎也不够大，这在嘈杂的环境中试图沟通时可能会令人沮丧。

谷歌电话是默认的通话和联系人管理应用程序。在印度版本中，该应用允许通话录音，但在录音开始前会通知通话各方。

Nord 3不支持OnePlus 11的LTE和5G sub-6GHz频段，但覆盖了全球大部分常见的蜂窝频段。

摄像头继承了OnePlus 11的主摄像头，没有哈苏镜头

照片模式下的1600万像素自拍摄像头
照片模式下的1600万像素自拍摄像头
1600万像素人像模式自拍摄像头
1600万像素人像模式自拍摄像头
主摄像头 人像模式
主摄像头 人像模式

1600 万像素自拍摄像头可在适当的光线条件下进行良好的自拍。虽然虚化效果可以更加明显，但人像拍摄效果总体上令人满意。前置摄像头拍摄的视频上限为1080p 30帧/秒。

即使没有哈苏品牌，Nord 3的5000万像素索尼IMX890主摄像头的拍摄效果也与OnePlus 11十分相似。细节表现得很好，色彩饱和度也很高。除非100%裁剪，否则噪点并不明显。

与Apple iPhone 14 Pro不同，Nord 3能够很好地保留阴影中的细节。主摄像头默认执行1250万像素分档，但您也可以选择直接使用5000万像素拍摄。

在普通模式下，相机能够进行2倍光学变焦。变焦后的照片可以正常使用，色彩还原和清晰度都不错。然而，我们发现该相机难以解决一些更精细的细节，例如下图中汽车后面的墙壁。

除了主摄像头外，Nord 3上的800万像素索尼IMX355超广角摄像头也提供了不错的效果。不过，与主摄像头相比，色彩显得略微暗淡。OnePlus将超广角从Nord 2的120°缩小到Nord 3的112°，显然是为了最大限度地减少镜头畸变。

在下面的照片中，Nord 3和OnePlus 11的建筑物边缘都出现了色差。而iPhone 14 Pro和OnePlus 11则没有这种现象。 三星Galaxy S23 Ultra.

主摄像头和超广角摄像头在弱光环境下自动切换到夜景模式，无法关闭。然而，在使用2倍变焦模式时，夜间模式需要手动激活。

Nord 3的弱光照片效果出奇的好，噪点低，细节分辨率高，例如泰迪熊的毛发和衣服上的文字。

主摄像头支持高达4K 60帧/秒的视频录制，但EIS仅在1080p设置下可用。

微距拍摄无法使用
微距拍摄无法使用

遗憾的是，Nord 3的微距传感器在性能方面有所欠缺。它采用了GalaxyCore GC02M1传感器，该传感器最初在Nord 2中用作深度传感器，但现在被重新用作微距镜头。

使用微距传感器拍摄的图像噪点严重，缺乏细节。根据不同的场景，色彩还原也会有不同。OnePlus似乎只是在规格表上勾选了这一摄像头，而没有给最终用户带来任何实际好处。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain Camera2x ZoomUltra-wide 0.6xLow light

Nord 3显示，在良好的环境光下，再现X-Rite ColorChecker护照的最大Delta E为9.33。在蓝天、紫蓝、白色和黑色色块中的偏差较大。

在1勒克斯的环境下，相机的表现有些吃力，导致许多颜色的偏差较高。

测试图中的细节在完美光线和1勒克斯环境条件下均得到充分再现。

ColorChecker
5.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord 3: 4.51 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 9.33 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.1 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord 3: 11.48 ∆E min: 2.99 - max: 18.61 ∆E

配件和保修：用于印度和欧洲的80 W SuperVOOC充电器

OnePlus Nord 3 5G包装盒内附带80 W SuperVOOC充电器
OnePlus Nord 3 5G包装盒内附带80 W SuperVOOC充电器

印度版Nord 3 5G配备了一个80 W SuperVOOC充电器、一条USB Type-A转Type-C数据线、一个手机壳、预贴屏幕保护膜、SIM卡托弹出器和常规文件。包装盒内还包括一封欢迎信、品牌贴纸和红线俱乐部会员卡。

欧洲版的Nord 3也提供了类似的配件，但不包括手机壳和Red Cable Club会员卡。

OnePlus在印度为Nord 3 5G提供标准的一年保修服务。该公司还提供多种附加保护计划，包括

  • 12个月延长保修，价格为799英镑。
  • 24个月的OnePlus Care，包括12个月的额外保修，售价4499英镑。
  • 12个月意外损坏保护计划，售价￥3,299
  • 12个月屏幕保护计划，售价₹2,399

输入设备和操作：快速屏下指纹传感器

在日常使用中，Nord 3表现平稳高效。输入能够迅速识别，没有任何明显的延迟。OnePlus采用了Oppo的O-Haptics功能，用户可以根据自己的喜好定制和微调触觉反馈。

在生物识别认证方面，Nord 3配备了快速、灵敏的光学指纹识别器。为了方便起见，用户还可以选择设置安全性较低的2D面部解锁。

Gboard是默认键盘
Gboard是默认键盘
O型触觉
O型触觉

显示屏：10位120赫兹AMOLED，带HDR10+和PWM功能

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

Nord 3的6.74英寸Fluid AMOLED显示屏分辨率为1240 x 2772，像素密度为450 ppi，动态刷新率为40 Hz至120 Hz。 我们从未遇到过40 Hz的刷新率，即使在空闲状态下也是如此。

加上纤薄的边框、支持10位HDR10+以及高达1000 Hz的触摸响应速度，Nord 3的显示屏带来了非常好的观看和交互体验。

我们测得的亮度分布为91%，当手动设置为最高亮度级别时，亮度值与额定的500尼特相差不大。据OnePlus称，Nord 3的屏幕能够达到1450尼特的峰值亮度，并支持8192个亮度级别。

当传感器受到强烈光照时，我们测得的峰值亮度为1,023尼特。

OnePlus提供多种显示模式可供选择，包括生动、自然、电影和明亮。

465
cd/m²		477
cd/m²		500
cd/m²
464
cd/m²		481
cd/m²		504
cd/m²
459
cd/m²		473
cd/m²		479
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 504 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 478 cd/m² Minimum: 1.95 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 481 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28

自然模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

使用X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3分光光度计和Portrait Displays公司的Calman Ultimate色彩校准软件进行的测试表明，自然模式的Delta E值最小。

灰度平均值 dE2000: 2.6
灰度平均值 dE2000: 2.6
sRGB 2D 色域：98.7%覆盖率
sRGB 2D 色域：98.7%覆盖率
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 1.4.最大dE2000: 3.87
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 1.4.最大dE2000: 3.87
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000: 1.29.最大dE2000: 3.72
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000: 1.29.最大dE2000: 3.72

具有默认色温的明亮模式（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）

明亮模式的色域覆盖范围最广，但会导致较高的Delta E偏差。

灰度平均值 dE2000: 4.8
灰度平均值 dE2000: 4.8
DCI-P3 2D色域：100%覆盖率
DCI-P3 2D色域：100%覆盖率
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 3.7.最大dE2000: 7.32
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 3.7.最大dE2000: 7.32
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000: 3.31.最大 dE2000: 7.27
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000: 3.31.最大 dE2000: 7.27

暖色温的明亮模式（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）

在 "明亮 "模式下提高色温确实可以改善平均Delta E值，但仍高于我们在 "自然 "模式下观察到的值。

灰度平均值 dE2000: 3.4
灰度平均值 dE2000: 3.4
DCI-P3 2D色域：100%覆盖率
DCI-P3 2D色域：100%覆盖率
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 3.42.最大dE2000: 5.67
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 3.42.最大dE2000: 5.67
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000: 2.57.最大 dE2000: 5.48
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000: 2.57.最大 dE2000: 5.48
OnePlus Nord 3
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"		Motorola Edge 30 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"		Apple iPhone SE 2022
Retina HD, IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"		Motorola Edge 40
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Response Times
-428%
-15%
-6%
-4%
-2989%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.93 ?(0.43, 0.5)
13 ?(4, 9)
-1298%
1.57 ?(0.7425, 0.827)
-69%
1.3 ?(7, 6)
-40%
1.55 ?(0.775, 0.7755)
-67%
56 ?(27, 29)
-5922%
1.14 ?(0.5225, 0.6135)
-23%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 ?(11.6, 1.2)
6 ?(3, 3)
53%
1.32 ?(0.6325, 0.69)
90%
1.3 ?(6, 7)
90%
1.67 ?(0.874, 0.791)
87%
20 ?(7, 13)
-56%
0.89 ?(0.419, 0.473)
93%
PWM Frequency
366.58 ?(100)
221.2
-40%
120
-67%
119.7
-67%
253
-31%
144
-61%
Screen
31%
24%
26%
27%
14%
33%
Brightness middle
481
649
35%
770
60%
620
29%
940
95%
662
38%
1023
113%
Brightness
478
649
36%
778
63%
625
31%
935
96%
647
35%
1042
118%
Brightness Distribution
91
98
8%
97
7%
98
8%
99
9%
92
1%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.18
16%
1.6
-14%
1.24
11%
2.4
-71%
1.44
-3%
1.6
-14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.87
2.07
47%
3.3
15%
2.31
40%
3.2
17%
4.74
-22%
4.3
-11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
1.5
42%
2.2
15%
1.7
35%
2.2
15%
1.7
35%
2.8
-8%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.236 98%
2.23 99%
2.318 95%
2.05 107%
2.179 101%
2.27 97%
CCT
6395 102%
2538 256%
6882 94%
6325 103%
6422 101%
6746 96%
6457 101%
Contrast
1655
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-199% / -122%
5% / 11%
10% / 15%
12% / 17%
-1488% / -737%
18% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.43 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 366.58 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 366.58 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 366.58 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Nord 3的显示屏在100%白色到100%黑色过渡的第一个脉冲中似乎很难达到完全上升。50%灰到80%灰的响应时间特别快。

OnePlus没有为手机提供直流调光模式。如下图所示，我们观察到所有亮度级别的PWM。

0% 亮度：243.15 Hz
0% 亮度：243.15 Hz
25%亮度 366.13 Hz
25%亮度 366.13 Hz
50%亮度 370.13 Hz
50%亮度 370.13 Hz
75% 亮度 367.79 Hz
75% 亮度 367.79 Hz
100%亮度 366.58 Hz
100%亮度 366.58 Hz

请参阅我们的初级读本"为什么PWM如此令人头痛"以及我们的 PWM排名表了解有关PWM的更多信息，并对经过测试的设备进行比较。

即使在明亮的阳光下，Nord 3也能提供令人满意的户外观看体验，因为自动模式能够将亮度提高到适当的水平。

在可视角度方面，显示屏保持稳定，只有在极端角度下才能观察到最小的亮度损失和色彩信息。

阴天条件下的室外观看
阴天条件下的室外观看
室外树荫下观景
室外树荫下观景
高视角稳定性
高视角稳定性

性能：Dimensity 9000在高性能模式下表现出色

OnePlus在默认情况下人为限制了SoC的性能。因此，除电池测试外，我们使用高性能模式进行所有基准测试和测量。相比之下，普通模式下的Geekbench 5.4单核和多核分数分别降低了30%和25%。

尽管已经使用了几年，但 联发科Dimensity 9000SoC仅在近期发布的产品中出现。在CPU基准测试中，Dimensity 9000的表现令人印象深刻，在CPU累计测试中大幅超越了该细分市场的所有其他智能手机。

在CPU基准测试中，Dimensity 9000的表现令人印象深刻。 A15仿生芯片在 Apple iPhone SE 2022在Geekbench 5.4单核测试中，Dimensity 9000领先Dimensity 9000多达44%。

不过，在Geekbench 5.4多核和CrossMark测试中，Nord 3设法缩小了性能差距。

CPU Performance Rating | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
95 pt
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
 
94.2 pt
Apple iPhone SE 2022 -10!
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
93.6 pt
Motorola Edge 30 Pro -5!
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
87 pt
Average of class Smartphone
 
79 pt
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
64.3 pt
Nothing Phone (1) -3!
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
63.1 pt
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
62.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
54.1 pt
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1741 Points +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (1211 - 1279, n=5)
1246 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1211 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1195 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
835 Points -31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
789 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
783 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
4788 Points +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (3736 - 4324, n=5)
4056 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4051 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3659 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3310 Points -18%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2987 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2817 Points -30%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (1599 - 1663, n=2)
1631 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1599 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1120 Points -30%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1022 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1006 Points -37%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4445 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (4130 - 4445, n=2)
4288 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3600 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2987 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2828 Points -36%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (935522 - 1017488, n=5)
987308 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
970465 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
966686 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -16%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
733484 Points -24%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
687619 Points -29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
582264 Points -40%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
540593 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
507481 Points -48%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
16611 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (13407 - 17573, n=4)
15462 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
14915 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13611 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13024 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
12699 Points -15%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points -22%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1132 Points +8%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1051 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (948 - 1114, n=3)
1038 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -12%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
734 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
703 Points -33%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
620 Points -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7714 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (7255 - 7714, n=3)
7474 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7070 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)
6460 Points -16%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4666 Points -40%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4576 Points -41%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4153 Points -46%
System
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
11650 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10739 Points -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (9398 - 11650, n=3)
10561 Points -9%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)
10308 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
9876 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
8961 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
6136 Points -47%
Memory
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7602 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (6873 - 7900, n=3)
7458 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7357 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)
7016 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5488 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4857 Points -36%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points -37%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4404 Points -42%
Graphics
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (19574 - 22155, n=3)
20741 Points +1%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
20494 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)
17782 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17159 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8229 Points -60%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
7108 Points -65%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6632 Points -68%
Web
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1951 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (1906 - 1951, n=3)
1921 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1843 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)
1574 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1533 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1337 Points -31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points -35%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1239 Points -36%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (29236 - 30392, n=3)
29836 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
29236 Points
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21840 Points -25%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20784 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
19875 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5835 Points -80%
AImark - Score v3.x
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
28688 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (27367 - 28688, n=2)
28028 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
25112 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
11860 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
622 Points -98%

查看我们的 联发科Dimensity 9000页面了解更多信息和性能比较。

Dimensity9000的10核 Mali-G710 MP10与 骁龙8代1's Adreno 730在 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro.

该GPU的性能也超过了 5核A15 GPU在整个GPU测试中，iPhone SE 2022的5核A15 GPU以9%的明显优势胜出。

遗憾的是，屏幕上的GFXBench测试最高为60帧/秒。这是Oxygen OS的限制，也反映在游戏基准测试中，我们很快就会看到。

GPU Performance Rating: Percent
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GPU Performance Rating
Motorola Edge 30 Pro -4!
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88.2 pt
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85.4 pt
Apple iPhone SE 2022 -4!
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
78.7 pt
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 pt
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44.8 pt
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40.3 pt
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2385 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
1877 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1567 Points -34%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1228 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points -66%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
686 Points -71%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
681 Points -71%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
2399 Points +1%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2373 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1629 Points -31%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1262 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
813 Points -66%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -71%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
687 Points -71%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
8909 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8667 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6483 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4405 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points -67%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2576 Points -70%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2434 Points -72%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5415 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5193 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points -6%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4518 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4227 Points -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14348 Points
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8601 Points -40%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5759 Points -60%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5563 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5129 Points -64%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10309 Points
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7606 Points -26%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5428 Points -47%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5341 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps +132%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +88%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps +80%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +57%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
358 fps +21%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
306 fps +3%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
297 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
202 fps -32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps -53%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
133 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
119 fps -60%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +102%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +25%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +17%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +2%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
187 fps -14%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
158 fps -28%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps -63%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps -64%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -78%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +85%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +2%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -23%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -58%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -61%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -66%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -71%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +28%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +13%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -25%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -38%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -51%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps +6%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
82 fps +1%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -47%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -54%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +40%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +40%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -23%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -53%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -2%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
39 fps -9%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -51%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -65%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -70%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +75%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +7%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -18%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -36%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -2%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
95.9 fps -7%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -51%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -61%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -67%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.2 fps -52%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.7 fps -65%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -69%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -69%

Basemark GPUScore

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø26.7 (18-191)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø13.7 (6.94-209)
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø18.6 (10.9-45.1)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø25.5 (16.3-211)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø9.53 (5.67-147.9)
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø14.2 (8.04-26.1)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø11.6 (9.12-83.5)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø5.81 (1.982-11.9)
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø7.39 (1.462-20.3)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø11 (8.52-88.8)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø4.13 (1.62-7.77)
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø5.71 (1.74-17.8)

更多信息和基准比较，请参见我们的专用网站 ARM Mali-G710 MP10页面。

在整体网页浏览性能方面，Nord 3遥遥领先，仅次于iPhone SE 2022。

256GB的UFS 3.1存储表现符合预期。摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro和Edge 40的顺序I/O表现更好，但Nord 3在4KB随机读写方面有所弥补。

Browser Performance Rating | Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Browser Performance Rating - Percent
Apple iPhone SE 2022 -1!
93.1 pt
OnePlus Nord 3
74.8 pt
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
68.8 pt
Motorola Edge 30 Pro -1!
62.9 pt
Average of class Smartphone
55.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
45.7 pt
Motorola Edge 40
32.6 pt
Nothing Phone (1)
29 pt
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
28.7 pt
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
182.6 Points +23%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
148.56 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (127.2 - 148.6, n=3)
141.3 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
121.6 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
94.611 Points -36%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
73.679 Points -50%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
67.258 Points -55%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
66.879 Points -55%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chome 99)
239 runs/min +58%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
151 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -5%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99)
129 runs/min -15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (110 - 151, n=3)
126.7 runs/min -16%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
70.5 runs/min -53%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
69.9 runs/min -54%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
55.8 runs/min -63%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)
53.71 runs/min -64%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
153 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (100 - 158, n=3)
137 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
97 Points -37%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
78 Points -49%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
69 Points -55%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
64 Points -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
65969 Points +30%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
50714 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
50626 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (47420 - 50714, n=3)
49521 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
33801 Points -33%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
28282 Points -44%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
25439 Points -50%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
24488 Points -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
1796.1 ms * -112%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
1742.9 ms * -106%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
1738.9 ms * -105%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -80%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
1208.8 ms * -43%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (798 - 1103, n=3)
916 ms * -8%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
847.9 ms *
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
819 ms * +3%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
497.2 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus Nord 3Motorola Edge 30 ProNothing Phone (1)Xiaomi Poco X5 ProSamsung Galaxy A54 5GApple iPhone SE 2022Motorola Edge 40Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
-18%
-33%
-62%
-11%
-10%
-4%
Sequential Read 256KB
1617.78
1832
13%
1638
1%
1008.77
-38%
528.32
-67%
1876.88
16%
1742 ?(950 - 2037, n=102)
8%
1882 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years)
16%
Sequential Write 256KB
1525.8
1028
-33%
1351.9
-11%
878.9
-42%
335.39
-78%
1587.93
4%
1160 ?(452 - 2004, n=102)
-24%
1467 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years)
-4%
Random Read 4KB
308.68
277.7
-10%
240.6
-22%
244.85
-21%
236.23
-23%
235.66
-24%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=102)
-7%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
376.9
339.5
-10%
228.2
-39%
267.41
-29%
70.52
-81%
229.44
-39%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=103)
-15%
310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years)
-18%

游戏：最高60帧

与我们前面提到的GFXBench屏幕测试结果一致，Nord 3的游戏性能也被限制在最高60帧。

OnePlus肯定需要与游戏发行商合作并优化Oxygen OS，这样用户才能充分发挥该设备的潜力。

PUBG移动版超高清：40帧/秒
PUBG移动版超高清：40帧/秒
PUBG移动高清：60帧
PUBG移动高清：60帧
玄心冲击超：60帧
玄心冲击超：60帧
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 3; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.6 (57-61)
OnePlus Nord 3; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.6.0: Ø59.6 (57-61)
OnePlus Nord 3; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.6.0: Ø39.7 (37-45)
OnePlus Nord 3; Genshin Impact; 3.8.0_15672274_15939604: Ø58.4 (47-61)

排放：蒸发室不能完全消除节流

温度

据OnePlus称，Nord 3采用了一个散热面积达4129平方毫米的蒸发腔。尽管我们在3DMark Wild Life Stress测试中观察到了节流现象，但散热系统的整体表现似乎还不错。

当将Nord 3推至极限时，散热系统会受到限制，导致设备正面和背面的表面温度分别高达49.2 °C和46.2 °C。然而，日常使用不太可能对内部结构造成如此大的压力。

Max. Load
 46.8 °C45.6 °C43.6 °C 
 49.2 °C47.6 °C46.2 °C 
 48.4 °C46.6 °C45.2 °C 
Maximum: 49.2 °C
Average: 46.6 °C
46.2 °C45.2 °C42.2 °C
45.4 °C45.2 °C43 °C
43.4 °C43.8 °C41.8 °C
Maximum: 46.2 °C
Average: 44 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
压力测试 - 返回顶部
压力测试 - 返回顶部
压力测试 - 底部
压力测试 - 底部

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +20%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +20%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % +19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +19%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 %
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
79.5 % -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57.4 % -31%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % 0%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 %
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
61.4 % -38%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % -40%
05101520253035404550Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.2 (14.1-14.2)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø10.7 (9.12-14.9)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.2 (42.7-51.5)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.3 (39-49)

扬声器

OnePlus在Nord 3中配备了经过杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）和高保真音频（Hi-Res audio）认证的带Dirac驱动器的立体声扬声器。约79 dB(A)的响度对于一般大小的房间来说还算不错，但在嘈杂的环境中可能就不够用了。低音几乎不存在，但中高音再现良好。

希望获得更好音频效果的用户可以通过USB Type-C端口或蓝牙连接外置扬声器或耳机。蓝牙音频编解码器支持包括SBC、AAC、Qualcomm aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive和aptX TWS+、LDAC和LHDC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2021.2272519.921.63118.122.24017.222.15020.323.26320.625.38019.322.210024.127.11252230.316023.339.22002547.325016.950.931516.151.440011.651.55001154.7630136180010.163.810009.866.412508.666.716007.467.22000770.425007.169.631506.567.940007.265.950007.66963007.565.780007.361.6100007.164.7125006.858.916000650.1SPL22.278.9N0.442.3median 8.6median 61.6Delta4.98.435.644.335.230.332.627.92929.737.438.130.631.629.333.226.736.624.34622.556.218.85516.258.51258.99.960.711.767.810.368.511.970.3127212.175.61276.312.180.112.779.612.779.512.978.213.378.213.276.513.674.613.67513.371.412.760.325.1890.776median 12.7median 7228.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus Nord 3Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus Nord 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理：闲置功耗低，电池寿命长

耗电量

空载功耗远低于使用相同SoC的OnePlus Pad。与竞争对手相比，负载下的总体功耗偏高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight / 0.59 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.46 / 1.84 / 2.14 Watt
Load midlight 8.64 / 9.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus Nord 3
Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 30 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 4800 mAh		Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 4500 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 5000 mAh		Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core, 2018 mAh		Motorola Edge 40
Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 4400 mAh		Average ARM Mali-G710 MP10
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
35%
41%
29%
31%
32%
-33%
22%
Idle Minimum *
1.46
1.2
18%
1
32%
0.97
34%
0.75
49%
0.6
59%
0.62
58%
1.86 ?(0.8 - 3.64, n=5)
-27%
0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
40%
Idle Average *
1.84
1.6
13%
1.2
35%
1.13
39%
1.51
18%
0.9
51%
1.78
3%
2.94 ?(1.5 - 6.84, n=5)
-60%
1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.14
2.5
-17%
1.5
30%
1.44
33%
1.62
24%
1.5
30%
1.85
14%
3.38 ?(2.1 - 7.15, n=5)
-58%
1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
25%
Load Average *
8.64
5.2
40%
4.2
51%
3.26
62%
4.91
43%
6.5
25%
3.02
65%
8.3 ?(7.2 - 9.5, n=5)
4%
6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years)
24%
Load Maximum *
9.99
10.4
-4%
7.4
26%
6.29
37%
8.93
11%
11
-10%
8.23
18%
12.5 ?(9.99 - 16.9, n=5)
-25%
9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 3 Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (1.753-8.24)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.11 (1.702-12.6)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.05 (0.888-11.1)
OnePlus Nord 3 Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.675 (1.464-2.23)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.619 (1.378-2.67)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.932 (0.853-1.092)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 3 Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.97 (7.7-8.2)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.5 (10.4-12.5)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.73 (2.41-2.98)
OnePlus Nord 3 Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.675 (1.464-2.23)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.619 (1.378-2.67)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.932 (0.853-1.092)

电池寿命

Nord 3配备5000毫安时电池，考虑到其强大的硬件，可提供良好的运行时间。虽然智能手机在闲置状态下会稍早耗尽电量，但在150尼特的条件下播放视频和浏览网页仍然可以获得相对较长的运行时间。

有趣的是，电池运行时间明显高于我们所看到的OnePlus Pad，后者也采用了相同的SoC和更大的9510毫安时电池。

随机提供的80瓦SuperVOOC充电器可在35分钟内将手机从零充至100%。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 15min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 35min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
28h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 50min
OnePlus Nord 3
Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 30 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 4800 mAh		Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 4500 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 5000 mAh		Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core, 2018 mAh		Motorola Edge 40
Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 4400 mAh		Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
-11%
-12%
-19%
8%
-24%
0%
2%
Reader / Idle
1755
1985
13%
1813
3%
1297
-26%
2591
48%
2049
17%
2272
29%
2253 ?(1160 - 14042, n=115, last 2 years)
28%
H.264
1725
1006
-42%
1059
-39%
1067
-38%
1508
-13%
797
-54%
1235
-28%
1312 ?(859 - 2321, n=114, last 2 years)
-24%
WiFi v1.3
815
816
0%
926
14%
827
1%
941
15%
769
-6%
924
13%
991 ?(476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years)
22%
Load
350
306
-13%
259
-26%
311
-11%
284
-19%
164
-53%
304
-13%
289 ?(73 - 427, n=112, last 2 years)
-17%

Pros

+ IP54防护等级
+ 快速Wi-Fi和红外热像仪
+ 50万像素索尼imx890传感器提供优质照片
+ 色彩鲜艳的10位amoled显示屏，灰白响应时间短
+ 高性能模式下的快速Cpu和Gpu

Cons

- 通话时听筒和扬声器音量低
- 无microSD卡扩展
- 各应用程序刷新率不一致
- 微距拍摄效果差，不支持4k视频eis
- 游戏不支持120帧/秒

评价与Nord 2相比有了明显改善

OnePlus Nord 3。评测机由OnePlus India提供。
OnePlus Nord 3。评测机由OnePlus India提供。

OnePlus Nord 3的起售价为33,999英镑，在竞争激烈的Android 中端市场中表现出色。它在几乎所有方面都比OnePlus Nord 2 。

值得注意的改进包括IP54防护等级的外壳、新增的红外爆破器、出色的Wi-Fi吞吐量、刷新率为120 Hz的更高分辨率显示屏以及从OnePlus 11继承而来的50 MP索尼IMX890传感器。 一加11.

OnePlus Nord 3在竞争激烈的35,000欧元以下（500欧元以下）细分市场中提供了大量的硬件和性能。Nord 3并非没有明显的不足之处，但整体体验大于其各部分的总和。

虽然Nord 3发出了所有正确的声音，但为了保持价格竞争力，它也有一些缺点。其中最突出的是微距传感器性能极差，应用程序刷新率不一致，Oxygen OS限制了游戏帧率，默认设置中的性能节流，以及缺乏4K视频EIS。

不过，Nord 3并非没有竞争对手。Apple iPhone SE 2022 在原始单核性能方面仍然领先。基于Snapdragon 8 Gen 1的摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro 是Nord 3的一个可行的竞争对手，尤其是以其现在的折扣价。Edge 40甚至配备了144 Hz显示屏。

三星Galaxy A54 可能不具备Nord 3的处理能力，但它提供了三摄像头设置、microSD卡插槽和eSIM支持。

如果您不追求性能数据，Poco X5 Pro （也称为Redmi Note 12 Pro极速版）则是Nord 3更经济实惠的选择。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供货情况

在印度，OnePlus Nord 3将于7月15日在oneplus.in和亚马逊印度网站上发售，售价33,999欧元起。这款智能手机还将于7月12日在欧洲上市，起售价为449欧元。

OnePlus Nord 3 - 07/24/2023 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 77%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
66 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
92 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
77%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > OnePlus Nord 3智能手机评测：近乎旗舰的体验，却不会让您破费
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2023-07-11 (Update: 2024-08-15)