Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Realme GT 6 评测--拥有 6000 尼特亮度和出色运行时间的中端智能手机

骁龙 8s Gen 3 会成为作弊软件包吗？

这款自称旗舰杀手的 Realme 手机希望在智能手机中拥有最亮的屏幕，并以强劲的性能为自己加分。在我们对 Realme GT6 手机的测试报告中，您会发现在日常使用中，Realme GT6 并不完全令人信服。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Smartphone Touchscreen Android

迄今为止，Realme 的 GT 系列一直代表着最高性能，包括旗舰处理器和极具吸引力的价格。例如，其前身 GT5.另一方面，制造商在其他方面也节省了成本，例如摄像头。随着 Realme GT6 的推出，这一传统得到了一定程度的缓和，因为这款中高端手机并没有采用当前的高端芯片组。它配备了 骁龙 8s 第 3 代这无疑是强大的，但性能却无法与 骁龙 8 代 3.

Realme 在 GT6 中特别注重 8T LTPO 显示屏的品质。据说这款中端手机拥有 1000 欧元（约合人民币 1093 元）以下智能手机中最好的屏幕，亮度达到令人印象深刻的 6000 cd/m²。Realme GT6 的零售价为 600 欧元（约合 656 美元），配备 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 内置内存。顶级机型（12GB/512GB）的售价为 800 欧元（约合人民币 874 元）。

Realme GT 6 (GT 6 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 735
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.78 inch 19.8:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 450 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 457 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, IR Blaster, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 162 x 75.1
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.69, OIS, Videos @2160p/​60fps) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, telephoto, 47mm) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, 16 mm, ultrawide), camera2 API: Level3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 22mm, Videos @1080p/​30fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, case, sim tool, realme UI 5.0, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, SAR value: 0.99W/​kg - Head, 1.29W/​kg - Body, fanless
Weight
199 g, Power Supply: 139 g
Price
800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
82 %v8
08 / 2024
Realme GT 6
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735		199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2780x1264
90 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S24
Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940		167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"2340x1080
80.5 %v8
07 / 2024
Honor 200 Pro
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735		199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2700x1224
89.4 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi 14 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		223 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
84.9 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Realme GT5
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		205 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.74"2772x1240
84.6 %v8
07 / 2024
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735		197 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2712x1220

外壳 - Realme GT 6 仅支持 IP65

Realme GT6 的颜色选择
Realme GT6 的颜色选择

GT6 的外壳通过了 IP65 认证，做工精良，但并不防水。塑料边框也意味着必须在触感方面做出某些妥协。玻璃后壳的 "纳米镜面 "设计基于哑光表面，这意味着不会留下指纹，而摄像头区域则采用了高光处理。后者就像一面镜子，很快就会因油渍条纹而显得脏兮兮的。

在正面，Realme 手机更像是一个旗舰杀手。它使用了大猩猩胜利者 2 号玻璃，6.78 英寸 OLED 面板的边缘也保持得非常窄。屏幕与机身正面的尺寸比达到了 92%。这使得这款继 GT5略显紧凑。不过，2024 型号仍然是一款大型智能手机。

测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机

尺寸比较

❌
163.13 mm 75.38 mm 8.9 mm 205 g163.3 mm 75.2 mm 8.2 mm 199 g162 mm 75.1 mm 8.6 mm 199 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 8.49 mm 223 g161.1 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 197 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 配备 USB 2.0 接口的 Realme 智能手机

在我们的测试样本中，快速 UFS 4.0 内存的容量为 512 GB，交付用户时仅有 457 GB 可用。内置内存不可扩展。不过，通过 USB OTG 可以轻松连接记忆棒。

GT6 为中高端手机提供了不错的功能。NFC、蓝牙 5.4 和 Miracast 以及红外爆破器都是 Realme 手机的优势功能。速度较慢的 USB 标准（2.0）不支持有线图像输出，这让它在高端产品中显得与众不同。在我们使用连接的 M2.SSD 硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行的拷贝测试中，USB 端口的传输速率极低，仅为 25 MB/s。不过，GT6 可以处理 exFAT 文件系统和微软系统喜欢的 NTFS 文件系统。

外壳右侧
外壳右侧
机壳左侧（按钮：音量、开关）
机壳左侧（按钮：音量、开关）
上外壳侧（红外热像仪、麦克风）
上外壳侧（红外热像仪、麦克风）
外壳下侧（扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽）
外壳下侧（扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽）

软件 - Realme 手机Android 14

Realme GT6 使用Android 14 和 5.0 版本的内部用户界面。Realme UI 的重点是人工智能功能。例如，文本和网站可以通过人工智能进行总结--类似于三星的 GalaxyAI.通过 "AI 智能搜索"，还可以替代谷歌的 "Circle to Search"，用于搜索对象。

测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机

可持续性

官方没有说明 Realme 打算为 GT6 推出多长时间的软件更新。我们推测将有三次主要的Android 升级和四年的安全补丁--据说后者将以 60 天为周期推出。在测试期间，安全补丁级别为 2024 年 6 月。

在可持续发展方面，Realme 指出其包装的回收率约为 45%，使用的是回收废纸。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 6 的 Realme GT 6

虽然 骁龙 8s Gen 3 虽然骁龙 8s Gen 3 实际上应该支持现代 WiFi 7，但 Realme GT6 只能在家庭 WLAN 中提供 ax 标准，而无法使用 6 GHz 频段。使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器，我们的测试设备显示 WiFi 6 的传输速率良好且相对稳定，峰值超过 800 MBit/s。

这款中端手机可通过各种 5G 和 4G 频率接入移动互联网。如果你经常出差，Realme GT6应该很少会出现连接问题。

Networking
Realme GT 6
iperf3 receive AXE11000
816 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
837 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy S24
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼51%
Honor 200 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
828 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼53%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1717 (min: 1627) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1728 (min: 1374) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1731 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼100%
Realme GT5
iperf3 receive AXE11000
971 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1000 (min: 722) MBit/s ∼56%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
863 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
719 (min: 637) MBit/s ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼79%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø863 (748-938)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø719 (637-785)
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø803 (348-845)
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø824 (412-871)
楼内定位
楼内定位
户外定位
户外定位

为了在实践中评估跟踪的准确性，我们带着测试智能手机进行了一次短途骑行，并用 Garmin Venu 2 记录了骑行路线，以便进行比较。我们非常喜欢 Realme GT6 的跟踪功能，尤其是考虑到它的价格。在 GNSS 记录的详细视图中，几乎看不到与所选路线的偏差。只有在少数地方，Realme 手机会偏离我们实际使用的路线。

Realme GT6 能够双频连接大多数全球卫星网络。在测试中，这款中端手机使用 GPS (L1+L5)、GLONASS (L1)、北斗 (B1+B2) 和伽利略 (E1+E5) 以及 QZSS (L1+L5) 确定其位置。Satfix 在室内所需的时间比室外稍长，精确度也差不多。

Realme GT6 vs. Garmin Venu 2
Realme GT6 vs. Garmin Venu 2

手机功能和语音质量 - 配备双卡双待功能的 Realme 智能手机

测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机

Realme GT6 的两个内置麦克风提供了良好的语音体验。在日常使用中，声音可以自然地传输，安静的背景噪音也能被可靠地过滤掉。噪音抑制的整体效果令人满意。

该机提供两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽，是功能齐全的双卡双待手机。系统中没有集成 eSIM 卡的选项。不过，VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能是可用的。

摄像头 - 配备索尼传感器的 Realme GT 6

与 Realme GT6 合影
与 Realme GT6 合影
与 Realme GT6 自拍
与 Realme GT6 自拍

3200 万像素自拍摄像头的分辨率比 GT5但这款中端智能手机仍然不支持 4K 视频或像素分档。尽管 GT6 并非自拍专家，但在光线充足的条件下，照片质量仍然不错。明亮的图像区域经常出现曝光过度和焦糊现象。

主摄像头采用索尼 LYT-808 传感器，像素为 5000 万像素，1/1.4 英寸的规格在这个价位的手机中算是比较大的。此外，f/1.69 的开放式光圈相当快，这意味着该镜头在弱光环境下应能拍摄出明亮、低噪点的照片。

0,6x
0,6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
4x
4x
10x
10x
20x
20x

实际上，对于一款中端手机来说，这样的效果也不错，但暗光下的清晰度却不高。相对明显的软对焦也是我们白天拍摄照片的一个共同点。不过，我们喜欢 Realme GT6 照片中非常好的动态效果和中性色彩。

背面的三摄像头由一个视角为 112° 的 800 万像素镜头和一个 50 万像素的长焦镜头组成。尽管我们希望 Realme GT6 能覆盖更长的焦距，但无损 2 倍变焦比主摄像头的纯传感器裁剪提供了更高的质量。即使是 5 倍变焦，许多细节也会丢失，拍摄对象也会显得过度锐化。

焦距为 16 毫米（等效于 35 毫米）的超广角镜头为这个价位的相机提供了稳定的图像质量，但照片效果并不理想。800 万像素镜头无法进行微距拍摄。

测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机

在视频方面，这款中端智能手机具有稳定的防抖功能，并支持 4K30 的高动态范围（杜比视界）。移动图像可以最高 60 帧/秒的 UHD 画质录制。"AI 夜视模式 "可确保在暗光环境下拍摄光线充足的视频，并可在黑暗中自动激活。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide AngleWide AngleLow LightUltra Wide AnglelZoom 5x

在受控照明条件下，我们将主摄像头的色彩表现与实际参考色彩进行对比分析。除了略微增亮外，50MP 镜头在 ColorChecker 通行证中显示的偏差之低令人惊讶。Realme Phone 在色彩保真度方面没有表现出任何异常值（>10），重大偏差（>5）也很少。

ColorChecker
3.5 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme GT 6: 3.96 ∆E min: 1.05 - max: 6.21 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
24 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
28 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
25 ∆E
21 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme GT 6: 20.49 ∆E min: 9.76 - max: 29.64 ∆E

配件和保修 - Realme 手机（不含电源适配器

可选的 120 瓦供电装置
可选的 120 瓦供电装置

Realme GT6 在欧盟不配备 120 瓦模块化电源。发货范围包括数据线或充电线、SIM 卡针和保护盖，以及包括保修条款在内的快速入门指南。此外，还安装了保护膜。

Realme 提供 保修期手机在德国的保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的 Realme GT 6

Realme GT6 在 OLED 显示屏中使用了光学指纹传感器，可以可靠地解锁屏幕。不过，在速度方面仍有改进的余地，但这款中端手机的速度并不慢。还有一个相当不可靠的 2D 人脸识别功能，它是基于使用前置摄像头的人脸解锁功能。不过，在光线不足的情况下，这个功能并不总是可靠的。

6.78 英寸超大显示屏上的输入反应灵敏，可准确地输入到触摸屏的边角。由于采样率高达 2,500 Hz，面板反应极快，触摸灵敏度高。不过，触摸屏每秒最多只能临时更新 2,500 次，例如在游戏中。

内置线性振动电机（X 轴）可在日常使用中提供舒适的触觉和精确的反馈，并可在设置中进行调整。

测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机

显示屏 - 配备 OLED 显示屏的 Realme 智能手机

OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。
OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。

内置的 AMOLED 超亮显示屏达到 FHD+ 分辨率，像素密度高达 450 ppi。刷新率的动态调节范围在 1 Hz 至 120 Hz 之间。也可手动设置最高 60 Hz。

据说这款中端手机的 OLED 面板具有业内最高的发光效率。不过，在播放 4K HDR 模式视频（956 cd/m²）或亮暗表面均匀分布（APL18，1,539 cd/m²）时，我们并没有达到宣传的 6,000 尼特峰值亮度。这些数值并不差，但并没有达到对最大亮度的高要求。在日常生活中，宣传中的 6000 尼特应该用在哪里，我们不得而知。

不过，对于 HDR 内容来说，亮度还是足够高的。支持 Dolby Vision 和 HDR10+/HDR10。

980
cd/m²		983
cd/m²		967
cd/m²
969
cd/m²		975
cd/m²		962
cd/m²
978
cd/m²		976
cd/m²		975
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 983 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 973.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 975 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Realme GT 6
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"		Honor 200 Pro
OLED, 2700x1224, 6.8"		Xiaomi 14 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Realme GT5
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-110%
-2%
-47%
-215%
17%
Brightness middle
975
1349
38%
1208
24%
1025
5%
1080
11%
1326
36%
Brightness
974
1369
41%
1194
23%
1046
7%
1084
11%
1312
35%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
98
0%
95
-3%
92
-6%
90
-8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
3.3
-313%
0.9
-13%
1.1
-38%
5
-525%
0.51
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.4
5
-257%
1.4
-0%
2.9
-107%
7.7
-450%
1.85
-32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.9
2.4
-167%
1.3
-44%
2.2
-144%
3.9
-333%
0.6
33%
Gamma
2.22 99%
1.97 112%
2.29 96%
2.25 98%
2.03 108%
2.191 100%
CCT
6467 101%
6635 98%
6413 101%
6622 98%
7001 93%
1355 480%

* ... smaller is better

由于采用了内置 OLED 技术，制造商使用脉宽调制来控制屏幕亮度。我们用 Rigol 软件测得屏幕闪烁的频率为 90 Hz，这可能是由于 BFI（黑框插入）造成的。用示波器测定的 PWM 是均匀的，不过 25% 的振幅可能更平缓一些。Realme 本身称其频率非常高（2,160 Hz），但我们的手动测量仅在一定程度上证实了这一点。根据亮度的不同，频率在 735 赫兹和 2,083 赫兹之间波动。在亮度低于 17% 时，闪烁为 "低频"。

5 % 显示屏亮度
5 % 显示屏亮度
10 % 显示亮度
10 % 显示亮度
17 % 显示屏亮度
17 % 显示屏亮度

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz
Amplitude: 24.9 %

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列 (最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

我们使用 CalMan 分析软件和光电光谱仪进行色彩校准。Realme GT6 的偏差非常小，Realme UI 界面的适应性也堪称典范。除了五种色彩配置文件外，用户还可以在专业模式下单独调整饱和度和单个色彩值等个别参数。

色彩准确度（配置文件：自然、标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：自然、标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然、标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然、标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：自然，标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：自然，标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：自然，标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：自然，标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5365 ms rise
↘ 0.5055 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.627 ms rise
↘ 2.812 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Realme GT6 的可视角度稳定性非常好，在平视角度下只能看到亮度略有下降。在日常使用中不会出现色彩失真现象。

虽然在我们的测试中，Realme 手机的峰值亮度没有达到 6000 尼特，但它在户外的良好可读性仍然给人留下了深刻印象。得益于面板的高亮度和 OLED 屏幕的强烈对比，即使是反光也不成问题。在明亮的环境中，即使不使用传感器手动控制亮度，也能获得 964 cd/m² 的相对高亮度（不使用 "额外亮度 "时为 583 cd/m²）。

测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机
测试 Realme GT 6 智能手机

性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的 Realme 手机

在我们的基准测试中，这款中档手机（我们使用的是配备 12GB DDR5X 内存的顶级配置变体）表现出了较高的水平，尽管数值低于 Realme GT5.处理器 骁龙 8s Gen 3GT6 中安装的 骁龙 8 代 2在 Geekbench 6 的多核测试中败给了骁龙 8 代 2。在我们的 AI 测试中，Realme GT6 的表现明显较弱，尤其是在与 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Ultra.

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points +8%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2021 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
2012 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1821 - 2012, n=6)
1916 Points +1%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1898 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1821 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=160, last 2 years)
1443 Points -24%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points +32%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5587 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
5284 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (4602 - 5284, n=6)
4906 Points +1%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4879 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=160, last 2 years)
4025 Points -18%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points +4%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1521 Points +2%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1498 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1451 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1329 - 1498, n=6)
1436 Points -4%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1413 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=171, last 2 years)
993 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points +39%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4746 Points +18%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4654 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (3980 - 4746, n=6)
4318 Points +8%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4155 Points +4%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4012 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=171, last 2 years)
3309 Points -18%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1905751 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points +6%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1607558 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1553057 Points +2%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1519490 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1142944 - 1553057, n=6)
1414338 Points -7%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329696 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=97, last 2 years)
1231394 Points -19%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
19748 Points +3%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
19083 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
17200 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (15547 - 19083, n=6)
17045 Points -11%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
16008 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=189, last 2 years)
12976 Points -32%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points +61%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1167 Points +50%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1112 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (771 - 1155, n=6)
961 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=156, last 2 years)
882 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
820 Points +5%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
778 Points
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points +37%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8433 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5685 - 9147, n=6)
7738 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
7565 Points +11%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
7354 Points +8%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
6785 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=150, last 2 years)
6288 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points +46%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
13391 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (9875 - 13391, n=6)
12187 Points +23%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11352 Points +15%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
11299 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=150, last 2 years)
10177 Points +3%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
9875 Points
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points +87%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8722 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5456 - 10977, n=6)
7838 Points +44%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
7836 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=150, last 2 years)
6745 Points +24%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
6131 Points +12%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
5456 Points
Graphics
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
29834 Points +16%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
29006 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points +4%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
25745 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
23009 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (8020 - 29006, n=6)
22941 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=150, last 2 years)
16876 Points -34%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1534 - 1893, n=6)
1744 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1734 Points +13%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1734 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=150, last 2 years)
1561 Points +2%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1534 Points
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1192 Points -22%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=134, last 2 years)
26055 Points +2140%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1321 Points +14%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1163 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (946 - 1321, n=6)
1161 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points -2%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1122 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1051 Points +13%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
927 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (564 - 1051, n=5)
878 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -11%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
564 Points -39%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
967 Points +32%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
843 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (414 - 967, n=5)
773 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points +2%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
734 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
955 Points +250%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (273 - 955, n=5)
577 Points +111%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
513 Points +88%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
273 Points

安装了Adreno 735的是 Adreno 740来自 骁龙 8 代 2的 Adreno 740，并对其进行了升级，以实现更高的能效。然而，在日常使用中，这一点必须受到严格质疑，因为 GT6 和 GT5 - 2023 机型的 GPU 整体性能显然更强。其他智能手机 (Honor 200 Pro, 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Ultra) 搭载的 Adreno 735 性能同样不佳，因此 Realme GT6 也不例外。不过，这只是高水平的批评；骁龙 8s Gen 3 的图形性能 骁龙 8s 第 3 代并不差。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points +35%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3565 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3332 Points +15%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3076 Points +6%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2907 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points +31%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3675 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3424 Points +15%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3056 Points +2%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2983 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13987 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points +6%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12004 Points 0%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11983 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points +42%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5434 Points +16%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5045 Points +8%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4686 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points +39%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5373 Points +12%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5145 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4886 Points +2%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4813 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7231 Points +18%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6113 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25121 Points +34%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18743 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16451 Points +29%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12776 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
543 fps +20%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
465 fps +3%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
455 fps +1%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
380 fps -16%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
362 fps +26%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps +1%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
287 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
234 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps +68%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps +49%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
221 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +18%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
149 fps -18%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +75%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +47%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +2%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps +46%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps +43%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps +10%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps -11%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +91%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +38%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +9%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps +2%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -7%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +85%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +50%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps 0%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -4%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +97%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +82%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +38%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +13%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps -26%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -40%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps +86%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +52%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +48%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
21 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps -5%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps -5%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1065 Points +1%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1030 Points -2%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1073 Points +4%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points +2%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1032 Points

在浏览器测试中，Realme GT6 在日常使用中表现出色，性能强劲，在滚动或调用复杂网站时不会出现真正的延迟。不过 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Ultra在基准测试中的表现要好得多。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
235.397 Points +148%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
162.564 Points +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=6)
154.2 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=160, last 2 years)
120.5 Points +27%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
94.736 Points
Realme GT5
67.947 Points -28%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
59.665 Points -37%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min +159%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
243 runs/min +136%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (65.9 - 247, n=6)
182 runs/min +77%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
141 runs/min +37%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +32%
Realme GT 6
103 runs/min
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
65.9 runs/min -36%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
185 Points +83%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
181 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=6)
144.8 Points +43%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=151, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +13%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
101 Points
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)
67 Points -34%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
61 Points -40%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
198 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ()
168 Points
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
66369 Points +120%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points +111%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
54365 Points +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=6)
45299 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=202, last 2 years)
37036 Points +22%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
30234 Points
Honor 200 Pro
28536 Points -6%
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)
24563 Points -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)
1837.3 ms * -50%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years)
1574 ms * -29%
Honor 200 Pro
1456.4 ms * -19%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
1221.4 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=6)
910 ms * +25%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
801.6 ms * +34%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
700.9 ms * +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

在存储速度方面，第四代 UFS 内存性能出众。特别是在读取和写入时，AndroBench 数值比 Honor 200 Pro.

Realme GT 6Samsung Galaxy S24Honor 200 ProRealme GT5Motorola Edge 50 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
-31%
24%
11%
10%
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
3452.12
3701.23
7%
1992.32
-42%
3475.6
1%
3926.6
14%
3622 ?(1851 - 4512, n=31)
5%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=191, last 2 years)
-47%
Sequential Write 256KB
3211.78
1435.39
-55%
1644.98
-49%
3117.44
-3%
3558.6
11%
2956 ?(1524 - 3678, n=31)
-8%
1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=191, last 2 years)
-56%
Random Read 4KB
315.76
373.12
18%
276.23
-13%
479.83
52%
349.1
11%
392 ?(250 - 480, n=31)
24%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=191, last 2 years)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
397.65
175.98
-56%
321.09
-19%
577.13
45%
430.6
8%
475 ?(45.7 - 709, n=31)
19%
308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=191, last 2 years)
-23%

游戏 - Realme 智能手机达到 120 帧/秒

Realme GT6 是一款真正的游戏惊喜。在我们测试了搭载 骁龙 8s 第 3 代(摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Ultra, Honor 200 Pro)总是达不到 60 fps，而 Realme 却能做到更好。GT6 可以达到相对稳定的 120 帧/秒，即使是《PUBG Mobile》也不例外。

通过来自 GameBench 的应用程序我们来看看这款射击游戏的运行流畅度如何。在低细节模式下，我们测得了上述每秒 120 帧的峰值，帧数没有明显下降。在中等细节（高清模式）下，帧数可以达到典型的 60 帧；如果我们在测试中增加图形细节（超高清），Adreno 图形处理器的 Adreno 图形处理器则能保持稳定的 40 帧/秒。我们的第二款游戏是要求苛刻的《源氏冲击》，运行良好，平均帧数为 59 fps。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG 手机
PUBG 手机
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Realme GT 6; Genshin Impact: Ø59.3 (54-61)
Realme GT 6; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø117.8 (109-121)
Realme GT 6; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.4 (47-61)
Realme GT 6; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (29-41)

排放--Realme GT6油门强劲

温度

根据制造商的说法，该机箱特别强调采用 "业内最先进的冷却系统"，但在日常使用中，9 层真空室所剩无几。在负载情况下，机箱的发热量相对较大，峰值温度接近 48 °C（118.4 °F）。在使用烧毁基准进行一小时的压力测试后，热量的产生也导致了性能的显著下降。

我们使用 3DMark 压力测试来检查 骁龙 8s Gen 3热引起的节流。对于 Realme GT6，我们在所有压力测试中都获得了约 45% 或更高的数值，这证明了系统性能相对不稳定。

Max. Load
 47.7 °C47.5 °C45.4 °C 
 47.8 °C46.3 °C45.8 °C 
 47.7 °C46.7 °C43.1 °C 
Maximum: 47.8 °C
Average: 46.4 °C
44.2 °C45.6 °C46 °C
42 °C45.9 °C47.8 °C
39.5 °C45.2 °C46.6 °C
Maximum: 47.8 °C
Average: 44.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % +39%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 % +19%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.4 %
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 % -2%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
% -100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.1 % +34%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % +6%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.7 %
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 % -1%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
% -100%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.4 % +37%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % +13%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.3 %
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.8 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.3 % +42%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.4 % +16%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.3 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15 (9.85-18.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15.1 (9.82-18.5)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.8 (13.2-18.3)
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49 (37.2-68.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø53.5 (36.8-68.9)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø62.3 (49.5-76.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56 (36.8-66.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.8 (16.9-29.8)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.9 (9.75-15.8)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.9 (9.75-15.8)
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.7 (8.51-16.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.3 (16.7-28.9)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14.6 (8.53-16.8)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13 (11.5-16.3)
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.01 (4.04-8.03)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.14 (4.65-7.96)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.76 (5.25-7.36)

发言人

Realme GT6 采用双扬声器系统，音量很大，我们测得的最大音量为 91 分贝。我们的粉红噪声测量也显示出中频略微上升的频率曲线。这款中端手机的低音没有任何深度，只能感受到一丝低音。

如果您想使用外部设备输出声音，可以使用有线 USB 端口或无线蓝牙 5.4。后者使用编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC 和 LHDC V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.838.12530.832.33125.5334021.5275031.331.66328.234.68016.533.310018.834.41251640.216017.95020015.952.425015.558.331516.360.74001461.450015.368.863015.471.28001571.6100015.273.5125014.276.816001576.3200014.279.2250014.279.8315015.581.9400014.284.5500014.180.9630015.577.9800014.474.21000014.173.31250015.772.81600014.158.1SPL26.991N0.883median 15.2median 73.3Delta0.810.233.240.631.834.318.237.523.438.732.436.419.439.818.841.317.638.413.844.915.955.71655.516.459.215.15913.860.212.967.513.870.113.574.413.175.313.876.712.5771382.313.280.314.58113.485.1148115.279.31579.313.677.2177715.571.32691.90.788.7median 13.8median 76.719hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRealme GT 6Honor 200 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Realme GT 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 200 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Realme 手机充电迅速

能源消耗

Realme GT6 的功耗低于 Honor 200 Pro在闲置模式下的功耗要低于 200 Pro，但这款中端智能手机在负载情况下的功耗略高于 骁龙-竞争。

5500 毫安时电池可通过电缆以最大 120 瓦的功率充电，完全放电后使用电源线充电所需的时间不到 30 分钟--前提是使用相应功率的电源装置。我们在测试中使用了制造商原装的氮化镓电源。不支持使用 Qi 快速充电协议进行无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.35 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.01 / 1.09 / 1.16 Watt
Load midlight 9.86 / 11.64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Realme GT 6
5500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh		Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh		Realme GT5
5240 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
4500 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-3%
-50%
10%
-15%
7%
-47%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
1.01
0.42
58%
1.11
-10%
0.89
12%
1.04
-3%
0.9
11%
1.353 ?(0.7 - 3.6, n=6)
-34%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
11%
Idle Average *
1.09
0.93
15%
2.67
-145%
1.05
4%
1.43
-31%
1.2
-10%
2.29 ?(1.09 - 6.52, n=6)
-110%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
1.16
1.07
8%
2.75
-137%
1.11
4%
1.5
-29%
1.4
-21%
2.42 ?(1.16 - 6.54, n=6)
-109%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-39%
Load Average *
9.86
15.43
-56%
8.13
18%
9.03
8%
11.38
-15%
6.5
34%
8.5 ?(6.5 - 10.6, n=6)
14%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
35%
Load Maximum *
11.64
16.51
-42%
8.64
26%
9.06
22%
11.47
1%
9.2
21%
11.1 ?(8.64 - 13.8, n=6)
5%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.07 (1.372-11.2)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.41 (0.99-10.4)
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.717 (0.632-1.078)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.414 (1.33-1.67)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (9.6-11.2)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.69 (7.88-8.74)
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.717 (0.632-1.078)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.414 (1.33-1.67)

电池寿命

Realme GT6 的储能功能提供了非常强劲的续航时间。我们的实际电池测试是在将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m² 的条件下进行的，在关闭 WLAN 模块的情况下，WLAN 测试时间超过 19 小时，连续视频播放时间接近 29 小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
31h 16min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 126)
19h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
28h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 18min
Realme GT 6
5500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh		Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh		Realme GT5
5240 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-14%
-9%
-19%
-5%
Reader / Idle
1876
2398
28%
1998
7%
2006
7%
H.264
1723
1227
-29%
1437
-17%
1086
-37%
WiFi v1.3
1155
880
-24%
993
-14%
897
-22%
939
-19%
953
-17%
Load
198
159
-20%
189
-5%
249
26%

Pros

+ 快速充电
+ 超长运行时间
+ 精美的 OLED 面板
+ 功能强大

Cons

- 强节流
- 不防水
- USB 端口速度慢
- 仅有 wifi 6
- 废热高
- 更新供应不明确

判决

回顾：Realme GT6。测试设备由 Realme Europe 和 TekPoint 提供。
回顾：Realme GT6。测试设备由 Realme Europe 和 TekPoint 提供。

Realme GT6 并没有兑现它的承诺，但仍然是一款非常有趣的中端智能手机。LTPO 面板亮度很高，而且校准得非常好，也有足够的空间根据个人喜好调整设置。不过，我们甚至无法确认制造商宣传的 6000 尼特亮度，最大亮度为 1500 尼特。内置 骁龙 8s Gen 3 也有一定可能被贴上欺骗性包装的标签。高通 SoC 固然是中高端手机中性能强劲的芯片组，但一款 Realme GT5则更为强大--有时甚至明显更强，尤其是在图形处理方面。

Realme GT6 是一款没有亮点的全能型手机。

Realme GT6 的高续航能力和快速充电时间会让买家感到满意。如果你不想没有 eSIM 支持或无线充电，那么 Honor 200 Pro提供了类似的整体解决方案。A 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Ultra也提供了快速 USB 端口和现代 WiFi 7。

尽管 Realme GT6 并不是一款真正的游戏智能手机，但由于游戏中没有帧数限制，这款中端手机具备了智能手机玩要求苛刻的Android 游戏所需的一切。只是在长时间游戏时，高节流可能会成为一个问题。

价格和供应情况

在欧盟，Realme GT6 在亚马逊和Galaxus 等网站的零售价为 600 欧元（约合 656 美元）。

注：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里可在此处查阅。

Realme GT 6 - 08/05/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 69 → 72%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
92%
Games Performance
29 / 55 → 53%
Application Performance
70 / 85 → 83%
AI Performance
32%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
79%
Average
63%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
95.4%
Repairability
45%
Software Updates
61.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 41.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Realme GT 6 评测--拥有 6000 尼特亮度和出色运行时间的中端智能手机
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-08- 9 (Update: 2024-08-15)