Notebookcheck Logo

Realme GT5 评测--配备 24GB RAM、骁龙 8 代 2 和 144 Hz OLED 面板的中端智能手机

价格和性能都无可挑剔。

尽管选择了 240 瓦快速充电、1 TB UFS 4.0 存储、OIS 摄像系统和三频 GPS 等高端功能，Realme GT5 的价格却相对合理。我们的评测揭示了这款售价 550 美元的旗舰杀手的弱点所在。
Android 5G Smartphone
Realme GT5 智能手机评测

像它的 前代一样，Realme GT5 试图以中档智能手机的价格提供尽可能强大的功能。为此，Realme 为其顶级机型配备了高通 骁龙 8 代 224 GB LPDDR5x 内存和 1 TB UFS 4.0 闪存。不过，有一个缺点是，这款旗舰杀手在欧洲无法买到。进口价格约为 500 美元起，有关可能在国际市场上推出的详细信息目前尚不得而知。

Realme GT5 (GT5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 740
Memory
16 GB 
, up to 24 GB
Display
6.74 inch 20:9, 2772 x 1240 pixel 451 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, up to 1 TB, 458 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast, IR Blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM: 850/900/1800, WCDMA: B1/B5/B8, 4G: FDD-LTE: B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B28A, TDD-LTE: B34/B38/B39/B40/B41, 5G: n1/n3/n5/n8/n28a/n41/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.13 x 75.38
Battery
5240 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 24mm, 1.0µm, 4K30) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 16mm, 1.12µm) + 2 MP (f/2.4), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 25mm, 1.0µm, 1080p)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, Case, Charger, USB cable, Infomaterial , realme UI 4.0, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L3, fanless
Weight
205 g, Power Supply: 161 g
Price
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
84.9 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Realme GT5
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		205 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.74"2772x1240
88.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Google Pixel 8
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.20"2400x1080
87.7 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Xiaomi 13T
Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6		197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
86 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2340x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"3200x1440
绿色的 Realme GT5
绿色的 Realme GT5

Realme GT5 采用了非常圆润的玻璃后背，其巨大的相机模块与 像素 8- 中国制造商称之为 "觉醒光环系统 Pro"。这款中端智能手机的外壳既不防尘也不防水。

除了这个小瑕疵外，Realme 手机丝毫不逊于Android 的顶级产品。所使用的材料质感上乘，在制造质量方面无可挑剔。此外，Realme GT5 的正面屏占比为 88.8%，屏占比很高。说到显示屏：制造商没有说明该设备配备了哪种玻璃。

Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测

尺寸比较

❌
163.13 mm 75.38 mm 8.9 mm 205 g162.78 mm 75.44 mm 8.59 mm 204 g162.2 mm 75.7 mm 8.49 mm 197 g158.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 202 g150.5 mm 70.8 mm 8.9 mm 187 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - Realme 手机配备红外爆破器

Realme GT5 拥有蓝牙 5.3、NFC、红外爆破器和快速 UFS 4.0 存储系统，其功能组合无需隐藏。后一项硬件无法扩展，但顶配版的最大容量为 1 TB。

制造商节省了速度较慢的 USB-2.0 接口，因为它不支持有线图像输出。不过，USB OTG 是可以使用的。在连接 M2 SSD 硬盘（三星 980 Pro）的复制测试中，USB 端口的传输速度仅为 32 MB/s。不支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 的读写。

软件 - Realme GT5 拥有Android 13

在测试时，Realme GT5 搭载了基于Android 13 的 Realme UI 4.0。官方尚未公布的是，这家手机制造商将在多长时间内支持其中档手机的软件更新。该机的 前身Android 升级和四年的安全补丁--后者目前截止到 2023 年 10 月。

开箱即用的中文版 Realme UI 既不支持德语，也不提供 PlayStore。此外，我们的评测样机不支持 Widevine L3，这在很大程度上限制了 Netflix 等网站上的剧集和电影的分辨率（540p）。

Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Realme 智能手机支持 5G

GT5 支持接入 5G 移动网络，但缺乏广泛的 4G 频率选择--至少在已发布的中国版本中是如此。Realme 智能手机可以选择 11 个 LTE 频段，其中还包括频段 28。但缺少频段 20。
在家庭 Wi-Fi 范围内，这款中端手机提供快速的 Wi-Fi 7。尽管如此，与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器搭配使用时，它的平均传输速度仅为 1,000 MBit/s 左右。原因是在测试过程中，Realme GT5 并不想在 6 GHz 频率区域进行通信。

Networking
Realme GT5
iperf3 receive AXE11000
971 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1000 (min: 722) MBit/s ∼58%
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000
891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 13T
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
919 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
843 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
750 (min: 546) MBit/s ∼44%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1573 (min: 1358) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1153 (min: 847) MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼91%
055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø967 (917-986)
Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (904-931)
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1000 (722-1023)
Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø903 (493-1010)
室外地点
室外地点
地点：室内
地点：室内

为了评估智能手机的实际定位精度，我们与 Garmin Venu 2 同时记录了一条路线。详细数据显示，这款中端智能手机几乎没有任何误差，定位非常精确。它的另一个特色是支持北斗卫星系统 (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b)、GPS (L1+L2+L5)、伽利略 (E1+E5a+E5b) 和 QZSS (L1+L2+L5) 等三频。同样，也支持 Glonass (G1)。

Realme GT5 vs. Garmin Venu 2
Realme GT5 vs. Garmin Venu 2

电话功能和语音质量 - Realme GT5 提供双卡双待功能

Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测

这款双卡智能手机支持 VoLTE，此外还允许通过家庭网络进行 Wi-Fi 通话（WiFi 通话）。语音质量并不突出，声音重现清晰。不过，在有风的情况下，环境噪音消除功能的效果并不理想。

摄像头 - Realme 智能手机拥有 OIS

1600 万像素前置摄像头可在日光下拍摄清晰照片
1600 万像素前置摄像头可在日光下拍摄清晰照片

Realme GT5 配备了 5000 万像素主摄像头。该摄像头基于索尼的 1/1.56 英寸 IMX890，还具有图像防抖功能。无论是白天还是夜晚，这款中端智能手机都能拍摄出清晰细腻的优质照片。但照片的鲜艳度稍有欠缺，在弱光条件下，照片的颗粒感明显。尽管如此，5000 万像素的镜头显示出令人印象深刻的质量，尤其是考虑到 GT5 的价位。此外，在色彩还原方面，Realme 智能手机几乎没有偏离参考色彩。

不过，由于这款中端设备只有一个 800 万像素的超广角摄像头和一个 200 万像素的微距摄像头，因此其余的摄像头镜头都凸显了偷工减料的必要性。 因此，Realme GT5 在使用 800 万像素镜头拍照时缺乏清晰度，变焦照片也缺乏锐度和细节。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x
10x
20 倍（最大值）
20 倍（最大值）
Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测
Realme GT5 智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow LightUltra wide-angleZoom 5x
ColorChecker
4.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme GT5: 4.94 ∆E min: 0.82 - max: 10.34 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
57.8 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
60.3 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
26 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
69.7 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
67.4 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
49 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme GT5: 42.42 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 69.75 ∆E

配件和保修 - Realme GT5 附带一个充电器

开箱时，我们的评测样品附带了一个 150 瓦充电器、一条数据/充电线（USB-C 至 USB-C）、一个 SIM 卡工具和说明书。此外，该设备还配有出厂安装的屏幕保护膜。除此之外，我们的供应商 TradingShenzhen 还在中国版的包装盒中增加了一个充电器的欧盟适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器。

Realme GT5 拥有 12 个月的保修期。使用我们的 TradingShenzhen 进口设备，可以将智能手机寄往德国的收货地址，以备保修索赔之用。

输入设备和操作 - Realme GT5 和面部解锁

由于其刷新率高达 144 Hz，采样率高达 2,000 Hz，动画和快速滚动都能流畅实现。振动电机也做得很好，但感觉不像顶级设备那样精确。

OLED 面板下方的光学指纹传感器反应快速、可靠。此外，该机还配备了相对不安全的 2D 面部解锁功能，在日光条件下表现非常出色。

显示屏 - Realme 手机采用 OLED 面板

OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和两个绿光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和两个绿光二极管组成。

Realme GT5 的 "Pro XDR "显示屏尺寸为 6.74 英寸，分辨率为 2,772 x 1,240 像素，最大刷新率固定为 144 Hz。
我们测得的峰值亮度超过 1,000 cd/m²，这在该价位段非常不错。在实际的 APL18 测试（平均画质水平）中，最高亮度也达到了 1,321 cd/m²。

作为 OLED 面板的典型代表，这款中端智能手机使用 PWM 控制亮度。不过，在 120 Hz 的频率下，波动很小。我们的 Flickermeter 测量显示闪烁频率为 360 Hz。

1064
cd/m²		1078
cd/m²		1123
cd/m²
1045
cd/m²		1080
cd/m²		1133
cd/m²
1044
cd/m²		1071
cd/m²		1117
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1133 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1083.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.87 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1080 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.03
Realme GT5
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"		Google Pixel 8
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.2"		Xiaomi 13T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"		Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
39%
44%
23%
36%
Brightness middle
1080
1450
34%
1254
16%
940
-13%
1002
-7%
Brightness
1084
1410
30%
1250
15%
935
-14%
1004
-7%
Brightness Distribution
92
92
0%
93
1%
99
8%
95
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5
1.1
78%
0.8
84%
2.4
52%
0.8
84%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.7
4.2
45%
1.6
79%
3.2
58%
1.7
78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.9
2.1
46%
1.3
67%
2.2
44%
1.4
64%
Gamma
2.03 108%
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
2.05 107%
2.23 99%
CCT
7001 93%
6584 99%
6350 102%
6422 101%
6468 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦级别和各种亮度设置进行一系列测量

我们利用光光谱仪和卡尔曼软件对显示器的色彩进行了分析。使用 "自然 "配置文件，DCI P3 在色彩（5.0）和灰度再现（3.9）方面的偏差可以说是较低的，但也超出了目标区域（<3）。值得一提的还有几乎完整的 sRGB 色彩覆盖范围。

色彩准确度（配置文件：自然、暖色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩准确度（配置文件：自然、暖色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（轮廓：自然、暖色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（轮廓：自然、暖色，目标色彩空间：P3）
灰度（轮廓：自然、暖色，目标色彩空间：P3）
灰度（轮廓：自然、暖色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：自然、暖色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：自然、暖色，目标色彩空间：P3）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8845 ms rise
↘ 0.7165 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.727 ms rise
↘ 0.6475 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

OLED 面板的可视角度非常好，亮度也只有很小的下降。在户外使用自动模式时，Realme Gt5 的高亮度给人留下了深刻印象。即使在盛夏的阳光下，显示内容也能保持清晰可辨。但是，如果希望手动调节亮度，则只能使用 483 cd/m²。

性能 - Realme GT5 配备高通 SoC

作为一款售价仅为 500 美元的智能手机，GT5 采用了功能非常强大的 SoC，即 骁龙8代2.在我们的基准测试中，与 16 GB RAM 搭配使用的 Kryo CPU 及其快速的 Cortex X3 初级内核（3.2 GHz）在 Geekbench 上获得了超过 2000 分的高分，尤其是在单核性能方面。在图形运算方面，Realme 手机的表现也非常出色，这些运算由 Adreno 740.不过，屏幕上的数值仅限于 60fps，这对于高帧率游戏行家来说并不抱太大希望。

得益于 UFS 4.0 存储系统的高性能和高速度，日常工作不会出现明显的卡顿或延迟。尽管基准测试得分不高，但系统本身的操作和上网都很流畅。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1521 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=20)
1455 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1266 Points -17%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1260 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -32%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1018 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
783 Points -49%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=20)
4918 Points +6%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4654 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3965 Points -15%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3833 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -26%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3395 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2817 Points -39%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2021 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1432 - 2104, n=17)
1926 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1741 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1653 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -26%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1252 Points -38%
Multi-Core
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5587 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5765, n=17)
5226 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4346 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4225 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -25%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
4034 Points -28%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=17)
1259049 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1100815 Points
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
903102 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
603046 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
507481 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
19748 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15774 Points -20%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
13966 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13024 Points -34%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
10897 Points -45%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=22)
1138 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1041 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
955 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
872 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
703 Points
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=22)
8794 Points +20%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
7354 Points
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7296 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
6974 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)
6460 Points -12%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
5971 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4666 Points -37%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=22)
13173 Points +16%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11727 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11651 Points +3%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11352 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)
10308 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
8961 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8251 Points -27%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10834, n=22)
9479 Points +21%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9115 Points +16%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
7836 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)
7016 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6863 Points -12%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6298 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4857 Points -38%
Graphics
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
29834 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=22)
27375 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20731 Points -31%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18975 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)
17782 Points -40%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11101 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
7108 Points -76%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=22)
1777 Points +49%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1709 Points +43%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1657 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)
1574 Points +32%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1550 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1533 Points +29%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1192 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
74958 Points +492%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
26303 Points +108%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
25563 Points +102%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=21)
15142 Points +20%
Realme GT5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
12656 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5835 Points -54%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3565 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2439 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2079 Points -42%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1690 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points -78%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3675 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -34%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2121 Points -42%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1725 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
813 Points -78%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13987 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8977 Points -36%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8294 Points -41%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6439 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points -80%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +102%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +57%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
465 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
429 fps -8%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
317 fps -32%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
262 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
119 fps -74%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +102%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +73%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +15%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps -44%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
157 fps -51%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -70%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps -75%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps +17%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +8%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
221 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
164 fps -26%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps -55%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -76%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps +38%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -3%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -26%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -43%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +5%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -7%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -30%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -46%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -81%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +68%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +25%
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
126 fps -30%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -45%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -81%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Realme GT5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -29%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -48%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -81%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
160.616 Points +136%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)
133.1 Points +96%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +83%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
104.25 Points +53%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
96.176 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
94.611 Points +39%
Realme GT5
67.947 Points
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
159 Points +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)
130.6 Points +95%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +75%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
107 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
97 Points +45%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
94 Points +40%
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)
67 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
55611 Points +126%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
47776 Points +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points +87%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
42222 Points +72%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
33801 Points +38%
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)
24563 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)
1837.3 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +17%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
1232.9 ms * +33%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
1208.8 ms * +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)
1023 ms * +44%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
998 ms * +46%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
728.6 ms * +60%

* ... smaller is better

Realme GT5Xiaomi 13TSamsung Galaxy A54 5GXiaomi Poco F5 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
-78%
-38%
-9%
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
3475.6
1861.15
-46%
528.32
-85%
1876.8
-46%
3651 ?(1851 - 4512, n=35)
5%
1882 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years)
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB
3117.44
1766.12
-43%
335.39
-89%
1773.94
-43%
3024 ?(1524 - 3889, n=35)
-3%
1467 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years)
-53%
Random Read 4KB
479.83
380.76
-21%
236.23
-51%
342.04
-29%
388 ?(250 - 480, n=35)
-19%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years)
-42%
Random Write 4KB
577.13
452.08
-22%
70.52
-88%
372.35
-35%
462 ?(45.7 - 709, n=35)
-20%
310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years)
-46%

排放 - Realme GT5 发热

温度

GFXBench 曼哈顿测试
GFXBench 曼哈顿测试

我们的分析显示表面温度很高，这导致在满负荷（CPU + GPU）情况下由于过热而结束了烧毁基准测试。这意味着我们的散热测量只能在简化（CPU）条件下进行。3DMark 压力测试也因过热而提前结束，这意味着我们无法评估 Snapdragon 8 Gen.的性能。

相比之下，GFXBench 电池基准测试（ES3.1）则没有出现节流现象。制造商积极的性能管理可能是 3DMark 测试在 20 次运行中没有出现节流的原因。这也是 GT5 因过热而迅速结束测试的原因。

Max. Load
 42.5 °C43.5 °C42.2 °C 
 44.5 °C44.7 °C42.1 °C 
 42.1 °C43.9 °C42.2 °C 
Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 43.1 °C
35.6 °C37.2 °C39.3 °C
34.8 °C37.3 °C39.1 °C
35.3 °C38 °C38.5 °C
Maximum: 39.3 °C
Average: 37.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

发言人

两款扬声器都能提供坚实的音质，但中高音还需更好地平衡。有线耳机可通过 USB 端口连接。喜欢蓝牙无线音频体验的用户可以使用多种编解码器（SBC、SSC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX TWS+ LDAC、LHDC）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.636.32525.935.73123.4354027.327.15036.236.46325.433.98016.635.810016.93312514.736.116013.149.620015.149.225014.354.131511.655.34001056.15009.163.963011.164.48009.167.6100011.873.212501575.9160011.375.720001278.1250012.378.9315012.781.8400012.682.8500013.179.4630013.477.3800013.573.91000013.568.71250013.668.51600013.661.2SPL24.789.9N0.675.5median 13.1median 68.7Delta1.310.937.638.724.729.22422.824.62532.129.32224.716.425.32628.319.83315.644.214.643.411.151.88.259.811.558.29.965.68.467.610.273.41175.313.473.712.173.6127612.378.212.479.71383.813.179.813.874.513.771.21468.813.769.112.86124.789.40.674.1median 12.8median 71.21.58.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRealme GT5Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Realme GT5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - Realme 智能手机缺乏无线充电功能

耗电量

电池容量因每个型号的规格而异。我们评测的样品最大额定功率为 150 瓦，储电量为 5,240 毫安时，充电时间仅为 20 分钟。顶级型号使用稍小的 240 瓦、4,600 毫安时电池，充电速度更快。尽管充电器功率强劲，但 Reallme 承诺其电池的使用寿命为 1,600 次充电循环。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.34 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.04 / 1.43 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 11.38 / 11.47 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Realme GT5
5240 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Xiaomi 13T
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
5160 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
29%
1%
19%
9%
-1%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.04
0.56
46%
1.13
-9%
0.75
28%
0.93
11%
1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23)
-0%
0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
1.43
1.08
24%
1.37
4%
1.51
-6%
1.04
27%
1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23)
-23%
1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
1.17
22%
1.42
5%
1.62
-8%
1.08
28%
1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23)
-29%
1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
-7%
Load Average *
11.38
8.01
30%
8.98
21%
4.91
57%
11.27
1%
7.22 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=23)
37%
6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years)
42%
Load Maximum *
11.47
8.89
22%
13.23
-15%
8.93
22%
13.84
-21%
10.4 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=23)
9%
9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.71 (1.324-11.3)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.12 (1.04-11)
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.974-1.136)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.838 (0.784-1.217)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.78 (5.3-9.07)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.82 (6.45-7.63)
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.974-1.136)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.838 (0.784-1.217)

电池运行时间

在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Realme GT5 的自适应显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m2，续航时间约为 15.5 小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 39min
Realme GT5
5240 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Xiaomi 13T
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
5160 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
939
814
-13%
1026
9%
941
0%
960
2%

Pros

+ 极快的充电速度
+ 附带充电器
+ 强大的 SoC
+ 快速内存
+ 明亮的 144 Hz OLED 面板

Cons

- 迟缓的 USB 2.0
- 无防水盒
- 仅有进口版本（无 20 号频段）
- 负载过热
- 低分辨率超广角摄像头
- 无 UHD 视频（前置摄像头）
- 仅有 Widevine L3

Realme GT5 的评价

回顾：Realme GT5。评测设备由 TradingShenzhen 提供。
回顾：Realme GT5。评测设备由 TradingShenzhen 提供。

对于售价高达 500 美元的中端机型来说，Realme GT5 提供了非常强大的硬件。当然，由于采用了 骁龙 8 代 2智能手机的激进定价策略。其中包括缺少防水外壳或无线充电功能，以及速度较慢的 USB 2.0 标准。不过，Realme 的 GT 机型整体上还是比较紧凑的。

极快的充电速度、高速内存和高存储空间（24 GB 内存、1 TB UFS 4.0）以及三频 GPS 通常都能在顶级手机中找到。 顶级或高端领域。配备 OIS 的主摄像头也很成功，高通 SoC 的性能毋庸置疑。遗憾的是，由于散热不佳，GT5 无法随时提供可用功率。

Realme GT5 在很大程度上以中端价格提供了高端配置。

对于可以接受较低性能的人来说，Google Pixel 8 是一个有趣的选择。不过，Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ，Poco F5 Pro ，在没有任何进口限制的情况下，为中端市场提供了强劲的动力。

价格和供应情况

从深圳贸易公司进口的 Realme GT5（12 GB 内存和 256 GB 闪存）售价约为 545 美元。

Realme GT5 - 01/18/2024 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
89%
Games Performance
70 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperature
47%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
73%
Average
78%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Realme GT5 (GT5 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Realme GT5 评测--配备 24GB RAM、骁龙 8 代 2 和 144 Hz OLED 面板的中端智能手机
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-01-23 (Update: 2024-01-23)