小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G智能手机评论:中端产品中的2亿像素摄像头
去年,小米推出了Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G,这是其受欢迎的Redmi Note 系列中速度更快、价格更高的机型。但其功能并没有真正弥补高额的附加费用。
今年,一切都应该是不同的:Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G使用的SoC与 Note 12 Pro 5G但也提供了相当多的优势,包括超快的充电技术,更多的存储空间和一个带OIS的2亿像素主摄像头。
70欧元(约75美元)的附加费用乍看之下似乎相当公平。当然,我们的评论是研究这种附加费用是否真的合理,即设备的加载速度是否真的快了很多,照片是否真的看起来更好,以及Redmi Note 12 Pro+是否能够与其他制造商的类似价格的智能手机竞争。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4 | 210.5 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4 | 187 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5 | 202 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
81.7 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Nokia X30 SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 185 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Google Pixel 6a Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20 | 178 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 带有大猩猩玻璃5的重型手机
从视觉上看,即使是专家也很难区分。Redmi Note 12 Pro和Note 12 Pro Plus:有相同的颜色,相机镜头的配置也完全相同。
我们的测试设备是蓝色的,所以它有一个闪亮的哑光背面,而黑色和白色则是光面的。然而,外壳几乎厚了一毫米,Pro+明显更重。210.5克,与其他智能手机相比,它的重量很大。
此外,框架是由塑料制成的,正面由大猩猩5号玻璃保护。该智能手机通过了IP53认证,即防尘和防水。该Galaxy A54通过了IP67认证,这意味着对液体的全面保护,所以它显然是领先的。
设备 - 大量的数据空间
256GB的UFS 2.2闪存的数据对于这个价格范围来说是很慷慨的,但不是唯一的,因为 一加诺德2T或 Nothing Phone (1)去年也提供了同样多的存储空间,在某些情况下速度更快。另一方面,直接比较的设备在这里落伍了。你可以在大多数智能手机中获得8GB的内存,价格约为500欧元(约500美元)。
没有用于内存扩展的microSD插槽,但有2个SIM卡插槽。然而,该智能手机不提供eSIM支持。
软件--广告和预装的应用程序
小米使用MiUI 14作为操作系统,该系统仍然基于Android 12。系统更新应该可以到Android 14,安全补丁可以到2027年。就后者而言,经验表明,在某个时间点之后,它们只能每3个月提供一次。在审查时,安全更新是从2023年5月开始的,因此仍然是相当最新的。
与vanillaAndroid 相比,小米的界面在某些方面有所改变。设置已经被重新安排和分类,快速设置和通知的下拉菜单是独立的,就像在Apple 。应用程序在安装前接受安全检查,系统在调整关键设置时进行双重检查。
在某些情况下,系统甚至会显示广告,但如果你知道怎么做,可以禁用。.小米预装了许多自己的工具和应用程序,包括一些第三方广告应用程序。
通信和GNSS - 大量的蜂窝频率
WiFi 6是该设备支持的最快的WiFi标准。与我们的华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000参考路由器同步,其速度相对较低且波动较大。平均近750-800MBit/s,Redmi Note 12 Pro+应该能够使大多数家庭网络达到最大。
在4G和5G网络中都支持众多的频率,所以你也可以用Redmi Note 12 Pro+旅行。然而,该设备并不是一个全球性的智能手机,因为个别频段是缺失的。在我们审查期间的随机测试中,信号质量一直很好,但信号强度还没有达到高端智能手机的水平。
在户外,定位是快速而精确的,精确度为一米。智能手机使用所有主要的卫星网络进行定位,以及SBAS,使跟踪更加精确。
为了测试智能手机的实际能力,我们去骑自行车,并带着Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行比较。Redmi Note 12 Pro+非常精确地追踪了所走的路线,而且只是不时地出现轻微偏差。因此,如果你正在寻找一个非常适合日常导航的设备,你在这里不会出错。
电话和语音质量 - 无故障通话
小米使用谷歌的默认应用程序进行电话通话。
通过内置听筒的声音质量很好。如果需要,你可以提高音量,使对方的声音相当大,但也会过度。总的来说,我们的对话伙伴听起来有点远,但总是很容易理解。麦克风能很好地捕捉到大声和小声的讲话,并将其清晰地传送给被叫者。
通过扬声器,声音听起来甚至更清晰,更有存在感,但却不那么响亮。麦克风在这里也运作良好,只要不是太大声,智能手机就能过滤掉环境噪音。
相机 - 大量的百万像素和OIS
Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G的主要焦点是主摄像头:传感器来自三星,具有200MP的巨大分辨率。可以使用全分辨率,也可以使用高分辨率的5000万像素模式。然而,为了获得更高的出光率和产生实用的1250万像素图像,通常会将8个像素结合起来。
由于有了光学图像稳定器,你可以在困难的情况下拍出没有模糊的照片。我们的测试图像显示出良好的清晰度;当你检查非常明亮和非常黑暗的区域时,你才会注意到与高端智能手机相机的区别,更好的光学器件保留了更多的细节。
在低环境光下也是如此,Note 12 Pro+ 5G无法照亮非常黑暗的区域。
视频可以通过主摄像头以4K和30帧的速度录制。也可以进行慢动作视频,速度最慢为32倍,但只有720p。亮度调节时常滞后,但自动对焦通常反应非常快。总的来说,视频的质量很好。
广角相机拍摄的照片还不错,但你不应该把它们放大太多,因为细节会变得模糊。200万像素的微距镜头可以拍摄非常近距离的照片。然而,非常低的分辨率使它们最多只能用于社交媒体或直接在手机屏幕上观看。
广角摄像头和主摄像头之间的混合变焦是可能的。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera - flowerMain camera - surrounding environmentMain camera - low lightWide angle我们在实验室里仔细观察了主摄像头的成像性能:细节丰富,对比度高,但对边缘的锐利度有一点下降。在1勒克斯的照度下,图表仍然清晰可见,但细节上相当有颗粒感。
配件和保修 - 包括快速充电器
除了120瓦的充电器、一根USB线和一个SIM卡工具外,包装中还包括一个手机的硅胶壳。
小米在欧盟为该智能手机提供2年保修,其中包括电池和电源的保修。这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。
输入设备和操作 - 小米上的精确指纹传感器
触摸屏每秒刷新240次,所以输入非常精确。由于帧率高达120赫兹,命令的执行非常迅速。
外壳右侧的硬件按钮有一个清晰的压力点。指纹传感器也位于这里,集成在待机按钮上。它能非常可靠地识别存储的指纹,几乎没有等待时间就能解锁智能手机。我们喜欢这样一个事实:小米允许我们选择是否只想把手指放在上面,或者是否真的要按下待机按钮来触发识别。
通过人脸识别解锁也是可能的。这非常方便,在我们的测试中也能顺利工作,但由于是纯软件识别,它不太安全。
显示屏 - 明亮,色彩准确,但遗憾的是有PWM功能
6.67英寸的OLED屏幕与小米Redmi Note 12 Pro的所有规格相同,在我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试中也取得了非常相似的结果:平均亮度为939cd/m²,然而,在小的照明区域几乎没有任何进一步增加。尽管如此,这个亮度对于HDR内容来说是足够的。
我们还测量了121赫兹的PWM闪烁,因此该显示器可能会给敏感用户带来问题。因此,我们强烈建议在购买之前在低亮度下试用该屏幕。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 942 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
104.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.263
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Nokia X30 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Google Pixel 6a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 12% | -38% | -134% | -9% | |
Brightness middle | 942 | 938 0% | 940 0% | 693 -26% | 758 -20% |
Brightness | 939 | 939 0% | 935 0% | 709 -24% | 767 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 96 2% | 99 5% | 83 -12% | 93 -1% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.05 | 0.9 14% | 2.4 -129% | 4.78 -355% | 0.9 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.65 | 1.6 40% | 3.2 -21% | 7.54 -185% | 2.5 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1 17% | 2.2 -83% | 3.6 -200% | 1.6 -33% |
Gamma | 2.263 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.05 107% | 2.228 99% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6477 100% | 6350 102% | 6422 101% | 7327 89% | 6599 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 121 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 121 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 121 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量
在更精确的色彩再现测量中,OLED显示屏的表现非常好,没有显示任何重大的异常值。在正确的色彩设置 "标准 "下,该屏幕也可用于自然色彩评估。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
显示屏在户外有足够的亮度,即使是在阳光非常充足的环境中。从侧面看屏幕没有任何问题,因为图像始终保持清晰可见。
性能 - 在其价格范围内不是最快的
与稍微便宜的Redmi Note 12 Pro,Pro+在性能方面没有带来任何好处。毕竟,它运行在相同的SoC上,其形式为 联发科Dimensity 1080这是一个中端芯片,有两个快速核心,时钟速度高达2.6GHz。对于要求不高的任务,有六个更经济的核心,频率为2GHz。
在日常使用中,Redmi Note 12 Pro+通常管理得足够好,而且该SoC还可以处理要求更高的应用程序。该设备只有在多任务处理和同时运行众多高要求的应用程序时才达到极限。
在这个价格范围内,还有更慢的智能手机,如诺基亚X30.然而,A54 Galaxy A54或 谷歌的Pixel 6a以类似的价格提供更多的性能。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (21997 - 22589, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Nokia X30 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G |
特别是图形单元的性能表明,在这个价格范围内有更快的替代品。尽管如此,这款智能手机应该仍然能够在原生屏幕分辨率下处理大多数应用程序。在GFXBench中,1440p或4K的帧率只下降到30帧以下。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Google Pixel 6a |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Nokia X30 |
红米手机的网页浏览速度相当快。在较大的网站上,滚动通常很流畅,而且图片通常已经预装。只有在打开网页时,才会不时出现短暂的等待时间。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (69.7 - 84.7, n=3) | |
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111) | |
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chome 114) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (62.2 - 73.7, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111) | |
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (71 - 87, n=3) | |
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111) | |
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (99 - 114, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114) | |
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79) | |
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (25154 - 31839, n=3) | |
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (1747 - 1797, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 114) | |
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) |
* ... smaller is better
凭借其UFS 2.2存储,Redmi Note 12 Pro+在速度方面是一流的标准。存储控制器也从闪存设备中获得了很多东西,通过与Galaxy A54 或Nokia X30 的直接比较就可以看出。
因此,你可以期待更短的加载时间和快速的数据传输。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | Nokia X30 | Google Pixel 6a | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | -47% | -39% | -2% | -11% | 48% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 977.8 | 1008.8 3% | 528.32 -46% | 499.88 -49% | 1312.64 34% | 887 ? -9% | 1887 ? 93% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 912.5 | 865.59 -5% | 335.39 -63% | 467.96 -49% | 712.94 -22% | 694 ? -24% | 1471 ? 61% |
Random Read 4KB | 250.9 | 241.83 -4% | 236.23 -6% | 189.83 -24% | 219.53 -13% | 228 ? -9% | 278 ? 11% |
Random Write 4KB | 243.3 | 234.21 -4% | 70.52 -71% | 162.59 -33% | 225.61 -7% | 238 ? -2% | 311 ? 28% |
游戏 - 高达100 fps
如果需要,Redmi Note 12 Pro+能够在动作游戏中创造出100-120帧的平滑画面,例如团队射击游戏Armajet。
然而,在大多数要求更高的游戏中,你必须满足于更低的帧数。例如,在《暗黑破坏神不朽》中只能选择30 fps。帧率是用GameBench软件套件进行测量。
通过触摸屏进行控制没有问题,位置传感器在相应的游戏中也能可靠地完成其工作。
排放 - 变热但不节流
温度
在高达46.5℃的温度下,当长时间在高负荷下运行时,手机会明显发热。
不过,这对SoC的性能几乎没有任何影响:在3DMark Wild Life Extreme的20次重复测试后,性能只下降了1.6%。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Nokia X30 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Google Pixel 6a | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Nokia X30 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G | |
Google Pixel 6a |
发言人
红米智能手机的立体声扬声器的最大音量只能达到81.1分贝(A)的平庸水平。反过来说,它们听起来相当清晰,只有在人声很高的情况下,高音才会有一点铿锵。总的来说,这些扬声器可以用来享受日常音乐。
当然,外部音响系统或耳机的声音更好。这些可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.2连接。众多的音频编解码器可用于无线音频传输,包括aptX TWS+、AAC或LHDC v3/v4。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 6a audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 持续时间长,充电快
消耗功率
虽然我们测得Redmi Note 12 Pro+在设备打开但不处于负载状态时的消耗量相当高,为1.1瓦,但在其他情况下这是该级别的典型情况。 三星的Galaxy A54或 谷歌的Pixel 6a在满负荷状态下需要更多的电力,但它们也能提供更多的计算能力。
红米手机可以用高达120瓦的功率进行充电。因此,电池最迟在30分钟内又完全充满。即使你只能把智能手机放在充电器上几分钟,你也能得到足够的电量,可以使用几个小时。然而,无线充电并不适用于我们的评测样本。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 1.1 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt |
Load |
4.2 / 7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh | Nokia X30 4200 mAh | Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | -1% | 6% | -2% | 2% | -13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.1 | 0.99 10% | 0.75 32% | 0.8 27% | 0.68 38% | 0.927 ? 16% | 0.883 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 1.4 | 2.03 -45% | 1.51 -8% | 1.5 -7% | 1.56 -11% | 1.68 ? -20% | 1.467 ? -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.9 | 2.08 -9% | 1.62 15% | 1.8 5% | 1.58 17% | 1.88 ? 1% | 1.621 ? 15% |
Load Average * | 4.2 | 3.97 5% | 4.91 -17% | 4.3 -2% | 5.37 -28% | 4.06 ? 3% | 6.55 ? -56% |
Load Maximum * | 7 | 5.85 16% | 8.93 -28% | 6.5 7% | 8.74 -25% | 6.45 ? 8% | 9.9 ? -41% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5G的5000毫安时电池在非常低的负载下可以持续26:42小时,这比一些竞争对手明显短。另一方面,在日常生活中,平均负荷更重要,比如上网时,在这里,我们的测试设备在15:52小时的水平上,属于同类产品。
在满负荷的情况下,你可以享受到长达4:34小时的乐趣。因此,游戏玩家在智能手机必须插电之前有几个小时的时间。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh | Nokia X30 4200 mAh | Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 4% | 29% | 19% | 15% | |
Reader / Idle | 1602 | 1598 0% | 2591 62% | 2467 54% | 1878 17% |
H.264 | 1003 | 1043 4% | 1508 50% | 1229 23% | 1318 31% |
WiFi v1.3 | 952 | 978 3% | 941 -1% | 860 -10% | 768 -19% |
Load | 274 | 299 9% | 284 4% | 302 10% | 360 31% |
Pros
Cons
结论 -Redmi Note 12 Pro+是一款坚实的智能手机
小米最昂贵的智能手机Redmi Note 12系列是一个有用的补充:顶级型号提供无与伦比的快速加载时间和双倍的数据存储。 Note 12 Pro.2亿像素的摄像头提供了一些不错的噱头,但在质量和灵活性方面无法真正超越其更便宜的姐妹机型的摄像头。
你可以用不到500美元的价格买到更强大的智能手机,但Note 12 Pro+在大多数情况下为日常使用提供了足够的动力,并配有快速存储。
批评的一点是,这款智能手机的重量相对较高。另外,令人讨厌的是,它配备了Android 12,并且在系统中有一些广告应用程序,甚至是弹出式广告。至少,这款智能手机预计将在4年内获得安全更新。
精确的定位,明亮的真彩OLED屏幕,以及可靠的指纹传感器,也是对该智能手机有利的说法。
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G是一款中档智能手机,充电速度快,跟踪可靠,性能适合日常使用。高分辨率相机提供了良好的图像质量,但并不特别。
红米手机的替代品包括 三星Galaxy A54具有更强的功率和eSIM支持。你现在可以在亚马逊网站上以399.99美元(-11%)的价格买到它。它是防水的,但内存较少,充电技术也慢得多。
这款手机 谷歌Pixel 6a也可以在亚马逊网站上以297.99美元(-15%)的价格买到,其后续产品刚刚发布。这款智能手机的功率很大,也有一个防水外壳。然而,用户不得不使用60赫兹的屏幕。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
- 06/15/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.