Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G评测 - 旗舰级的超薄5G智能手机与OIS?

在一个点上不再是最新的了。

Redmi Note 12 Pro旨在通过新的相机传感器和光学图像稳定技术在中端市场设立新标准。除了 "旗舰相机 "之外,还使用了新的联发科Dimensity 1080处理器。在此了解从红米11 Pro升级是否值得。
5G Smartphone Touchscreen
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论

Redmi Note 10 Pro最近,小米的Note Pro系列代表了强大的相机与中端非常好的显示屏相结合。因此,中国制造商在Note 12 Pro上也以这些品质为目标,这并不令人惊讶。

小米的继任者是笔记11专业再次提供了一个大而快的6.67英寸120-Hz 1,080p+ AMOLED显示屏,但现在你也可以根据内容调整刷新率。凭借杜比视界、HDR10+和立体声扬声器,媒体消费现在也是小米智能手机的重点。虽然Note 10 Pro和Note 11 Pro使用了三星的108MP传感器(ISOCELL HM2),但小米现在使用了索尼IMX766,分辨率为50MP,包括OIS,我们已经从 小米12.

在德国,Redmi Note 12 Pro有128GB UFS 2.2存储空间和可选的6(建议零售价:399欧元,约439美元)或8GB LPDDR4X内存(建议零售价:429欧元,约472美元),但在正式销售开始后不久,价格开始向300欧元大关(约330美元)移动。在本次测试时,256GB版本的联发科Dimensity 1080智能手机已经可以买到约350欧元(约385美元)。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Redmi Note 12 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, IR blaster, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G: 850 900 1,800 1,900 MHz; 3G: 1/2/4/5/6/8/19; 4G: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/66/38/40/41; 5G: n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 162.9 x 76
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 1/1.56", 1.0µm) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 1/4", 1.12µm) + 2 MP (f/2.4, macro)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 1/3.06", 1.0µm)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, case, charger, USB cable, info material, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, SAR value: 0.376W/​kg Head, 0.798W/​kg Body, fanless
Weight
187 g, Power Supply: 131 g
Price
430 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
85.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4
187 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
83.6 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
155 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.30"2400x1080
83.4 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86.4 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco F4
SD 870, Adreno 650
195 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
Redmi Note 极地白的12专业版
Redmi Note 极地白的12专业版
Redmi Note 天蓝色的12个专业版
Redmi Note 天蓝色的12个专业版

Redmi Note 12 Pro有午夜黑、天蓝和极地白三种颜色。无论你得到的是白色还是黑色版本,高光泽度的表面都会把指纹变成一个明显的问题。因此,我们建议得到蓝色版本的Redmi Note 12 Pro,它的背面是哑光玻璃。然而,我们的黑色测试机的外壳在我们手中也提供了高质量的感觉,做工良好。尽管它的电池容量高达5000毫安时,但小米智能手机很苗条,只有7.9毫米(约0.31英寸),也相当轻,有187克(约6.6盎司)。框架由塑料制成的事实也有助于实现低重量。

由于采用了新的柔性Flow AMOLED材料,OLED面板下方的边框明显比前代产品要小,因此正面87%的面积由显示屏组成,而前代产品的86%仍然是显示屏。 Note 11 Pro.显示器由康宁大猩猩5号玻璃保护。防尘和防水也是指定的,至少可以根据IP53标准防止溅水。在这方面,三星仍然领先于其 Galaxy A系列提供IP-67认证。

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论

尺寸比较

164.19 mm 76.1 mm 8.12 mm 202 g163.2 mm 75.95 mm 7.7 mm 195 g162.9 mm 76 mm 7.9 mm 187 g159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g152.9 mm 71.2 mm 7.75 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备--小米智能手机与红外辐射器

在设备方面,最新一代的红米手机再次能够显示其优势,这款中端智能手机的买家不必没有3.5毫米音频端口、Widevine DRM L1、红外辐射器、蓝牙5.2或用于非接触支付的NFC芯片。

就像在 高端领域、小米也在其中端智能手机中使用USB 2.0,支持USB OTG,但不支持有线图像输出。这种连接不允许快速的数据传输率,在我们的拷贝测试中,Note 12 Pro的传输率只达到44MB/s。

在交付状态下,在我们的测试装置中,大约106GB的存储空间仍可供用户使用。 那些需要更多的人必须选择256GB的版本,因为内部存储不能再通过microSD卡扩展。

右侧(按键:音量、开/关)。
右侧(按键:音量、开/关)。
左侧
左侧
底部(扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡插槽)
底部(扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡插槽)
顶部(音频端口、扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器)
顶部(音频端口、扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器)

软件--小米智能手机与Android 12

不幸的是,这家中国制造商在软件更新方面并不像三星那样慷慨,例如,三星提供四个大型更新和五年的软件支持,以及目前Android 13,其 Galaxy A34.即使Redmi Note 12 Pro已经使用了新的MIUI 14版本,那仍然只基于Android 12。另一方面,在这次测试时,小米智能手机已经使用了2023年2月的相当现行的安全补丁。

根据小米德国公司对我们问题的回应,Note 12 Pro将只收到两个大的Android 更新。你还应该注意到,你已经用完了一个主要的操作系统升级,以达到目前的Android 13,这意味着下一个Android 代(Android 14)将可能是小米智能手机的终点。在2027年之前,应该还有Note 12 Pro的安全更新,也就是在其推出四年之后。

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论

通信和GNSS -Redmi Note 12 Pro with Wi-Fi 6

这款中端智能手机使用所有当前的移动通信标准,包括用于移动互联网接入的5G(Sub6)。由于有20个LTE频段,对于Note 12 Pro这个价格级别来说,频率支持是很广泛的,德国用户在这方面得到了很好的支持。

在家里的WLAN中,Redmi Note 12 Pro使用快速Wi-Fi 6,但6-Gigahertz频段不能用于WLAN通信。与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器相结合,我们测量的峰值几乎达到1000 Mbit/s,但在接收时,我们 "只 "达到平均825 Mbit/s。其竞争对手的Wi-Fi 5只达到明显低于红米手机的速度,对于一款不到400欧元(约440美元)的中端智能手机来说,速度非常好。在家里的网络中,小米手机也能以大部分时间保持恒定的传输速率而得分。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 (790min - 837max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s -13%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
677 (331min - 713max) MBit/s -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
346 (334min - 353max) MBit/s -58%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s -58%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 (323min - 353max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
977 (487min - 997max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
960 (480min - 997max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s -25%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 (346min - 370max) MBit/s -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 (180min - 373max) MBit/s -64%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s -72%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø821 (790-837)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (334-353)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø960 (487-997)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø348 (180-373)
在户外定位
在户外定位
在室内定位
在室内定位

为了评估Note 12 Pro在实践中的定位能力,我们用Garmin Venu 2记录了我们的路线,并进行对比。尽管GPS记录并不总是与我们在短途自行车旅行中的实际路线一致,但偏差却很适中。 尽管在定位精度方面存在一些小的弱点,但Note 12 Pro非常适用于日常导航任务。

不幸的是,这款中档智能手机只能通过单频GNSS确定其位置--在我们的测试中,我们能够通过GPS(L1)、GLONASS(L1)、BeiDou(B1)和Galileo(E1)以及SBAS建立连接。在室外,连接很快就建立起来,精确度约为一米,即使在室内,红米智能手机也能迅速定位其位置。

电话功能和语音质量--小米双SIM卡的智能手机

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论

Redmi Note 12 Pro提供了一个体面的语音质量,使其非常适用于电话或视频会议。支持VoLTE和WLAN通话等重要标准。辐射值为0.376 W/kg(头部)和0.798 W/kg(身体),幸运的是辐射值也相当低。 小米智能手机的卡槽能够容纳两张Nano-SIM卡。使用5G时也支持双SIM卡功能。

照相机 - 小米智能手机,5千万像素

使用1600万像素前置摄像头的照片模式
使用1600万像素前置摄像头的照片模式
使用1600万像素前置摄像头的人像模式
使用1600万像素前置摄像头的人像模式

与其前辈相比,Redmi Note 12 Pro没有使用108万像素的摄像头,而是使用了索尼IMX766,这也包括在 小米12.主摄像头伴随着50-MP的传感器,具有光学图像稳定功能,并在标准设置下将四个相邻的像素组合成一个超级像素。的fauxpas。11号机其全高清视频记录的限制,不再由这个继任者重复。Note 12 Pro能够以30帧/秒的UHD质量录制视频,或者以高达120帧/秒的1080p分辨率录制视频。

超广角
超广角
广角
广角
2倍变焦
2倍变焦
5倍变焦
5倍变焦
10倍变焦(最大)
10倍变焦(最大)

在日光条件下,索尼IMX766成功地拍出了具有高度细节和良好锐度的美丽照片。即使我们并不总是对白平衡印象深刻,但我们喜欢这款中档智能手机的主摄像头。即使在弱光条件下,其图像质量也明显好于 Note 11 Pro和我们用谷歌Pixel 6a拍摄的对比照片 谷歌Pixel 6a我们与谷歌Pixel 6a的对比照片也证实了Redmi Note 12 Pro的相机性能有了很大的飞跃,即使传感器的像素数量已经大大减少。

不幸的是,我们不能对低分辨率的超广角摄像头说同样的话,它在边缘继续明显扭曲,显示出许多图像伪影,并提供低水平的清晰度。

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightUltraweitwinkelZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images

在受控的光线条件下,我们再次详细观察了索尼公司1/1.56英寸传感器的图像质量。测得的与参考色的偏差仍在令人满意的范围内,与前代产品相比有了明显改善。虽然颜色的再现不那么明显,但Redmi Note 12 Pro在白色再现方面显示出一些弱点。

ColorChecker
6.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G: 6.57 ∆E min: 1.14 - max: 12.47 ∆E
ColorChecker
26 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
37 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
57.2 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G: 36.35 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 57.19 ∆E

附件和保修 -Redmi Note 12 Pro,附带充电器

Note 12 Pro的67瓦充电器
Note 12 Pro的67瓦充电器

Note 12 Pro的包装盒包括一个保护罩、USB-C电缆、快速入门指南和SIM卡工具包,幸运的是,这款中端智能手机还包括一个相应的67瓦涡轮充电充电器。

在德国,红米智能手机只有一年的有限标准保修。然而,德国新设备所需的24个月的制造商保修期仍然不受此影响。

输入设备和操作 - 带有面部解锁的小米智能手机

刷新率为120赫兹的AMOLED面板使动画和滚动的网站显得非常流畅。扫描率高达240赫兹的电容式触摸屏能够快速、准确地识别输入。在交付状态下,制造商安装了保护膜,不容易出现油腻的污点。Redmi Note 12 Pro的振动马达对于一款中端智能手机来说非常有吸引力,而且很准确。

隐藏在电源按钮中的指纹传感器提供生物识别安全。Redmi Note 12 Pro中的定位感觉非常舒适,使其很容易获得。主动式传感器反应迅速,提供良好的识别率。在光线良好的情况下,通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别,解锁过程甚至更快。然而,这里使用的二维程序不太安全。

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论

显示屏 - 小米智能手机采用AMOLED技术

显示子像素网格
显示子像素网格

笔记11 Pro之前,它的中端继任者有一个大的6.67英寸AMOLED显示屏,提供2400 x 1,080像素的分辨率,支持120赫兹的刷新率。即使红米手机没有使用能够提供可变频率的LTPO面板,但Note 12 Pro能够在60和120 Hz之间自动切换频率。然而,目前这一功能似乎仍局限于一些特定的应用程序,因为即使在显示主屏幕5分钟后,Note 12 Pro仍停留在120赫兹。例如,当启动一些选定的应用程序如YouTube时,显示屏就会切换到60赫兹模式。在这方面仍然需要一些软件的完善。

中国制造商规定面板的最大亮度为900cd/m²,这几乎与我们在启动亮度传感器显示纯白色显示屏时的测量值完全吻合。当在APL 18中加入黑暗区域时,红米智能手机在显示屏中心达到了非常相似的953 cd/m²。有了这个,经过DolbyVision认证的OLED面板也适用于再现HDR内容。

由于这里使用的显示技术,Redmi Note 12 Pro也不能幸免于显示闪烁的问题。在我们的测量中,PWM频率几乎没有变化,保持在一个相对稳定的120赫兹。然而,小米自己提到了一个非常高的PWM频率(1920赫兹),特别是对于敏感的用户来说,这应该是更舒适的。我们无法最终确定这种差异的原因是在我们的测量设备中,还是在我们的测试中这种类似于直流调光的自动模式根本没有被激活。

921
cd/m²
933
cd/m²
958
cd/m²
921
cd/m²
938
cd/m²
963
cd/m²
921
cd/m²
935
cd/m²
958
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 963 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 938.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 938 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Poco F4
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-52%
-67%
-65%
-100%
Brightness middle
938
675
-28%
984
5%
718
-23%
917
-2%
Brightness
939
686
-27%
992
6%
730
-22%
923
-2%
Brightness Distribution
96
95
-1%
98
2%
92
-4%
96
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
1.3
-44%
1.6
-78%
1.62
-80%
2
-122%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.6
3.9
-144%
3.8
-138%
4.21
-163%
5.2
-225%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1
1.7
-70%
3
-200%
2
-100%
3.5
-250%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.16 102%
2.14 103%
2.156 102%
2.23 99%
CCT
6350 102%
6591 99%
6518 100%
6545 99%
6447 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平下,以各种亮度设置进行一系列的测量

我们使用照片光谱仪和Calman分析软件评估显示器的色彩再现。在默认的 "标准 "色彩配置文件中,Redmi Note 12 Pro提供了一个非常准确的调整。如果有的话,与目标sRGB色彩空间的差异只在洋红色上明显可见。小米为OLED面板指定了DCI-P3色彩空间的完整覆盖。

在调整选项方面,除了三种不同的颜色配置文件,MIUI 14用户界面还提供了一个单独模式。这允许你根据个人喜好调整色温,你也可以定义一些个人显示参数,如饱和度或伽玛,以及目标色彩空间(P3,sRGB)。

色彩精度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准)
色彩精度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准)
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准)
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准)。
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.624 ms rise
↘ 0.6365 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.684 ms rise
↘ 0.755 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在户外,这款中档智能手机的显示屏可以轻松阅读,即使你不能指望小米13 Pro的亮度储备在这里。即使在晴天,红米12 Pro也有很好的表现,但一些明显的反射在这里会成为一个障碍。那些没有自动亮度调节的人不得不满足于512cd/m²。

AMOLED显示屏的可视角度稳定性非常好。即使在非常陡峭的视角下,也几乎没有任何恼人的颜色变化,而且亮度也只是轻微下降。

小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论

性能 -Redmi Note 12 Pro,采用联发科SoC

Redmi Note 12 Pro使用的是后继的 Dimensity 920的后继者,它也是在N6工艺中以6纳米的结构宽度制造的。联发科的联发科Dimensity 1080是基于两个强大的ARM Cortex A78计算核心,同时还有六个高效的Cortex A55核心。

在我们的CPU基准测试包中,Redmi Note 12 Pro提供了良好的结果,但一个 Poco F4配有 高通骁龙870在Geekbench中几乎快了三分之一。令人惊讶的是,一台 realme 9 Pro Plus 配备了 联发科Dimensity 920甚至略微领先于Redmi Note 12 Pro。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +30%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
963 Points +26%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
814 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (761 - 782, n=3)
769 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
765 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
684 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
666 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +63%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3007 Points +48%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (2035 - 2315, n=3)
2130 Points +5%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2046 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2035 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1928 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1921 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points -8%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points +30%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (968 - 1029, n=2)
999 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
968 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points +53%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (2201 - 2497, n=2)
2349 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2201 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12866 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (11721 - 12564, n=3)
12016 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
11763 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points -2%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
10740 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10396 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
9741 Points -17%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
734 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
665 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (657 - 672, n=3)
665 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
599 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
574 Points -14%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +50%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
5616 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4189 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (3850 - 4247, n=3)
4095 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3822 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3638 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points -13%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +52%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
8962 Points +34%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7950 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7836 Points +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (6684 - 7761, n=3)
7209 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
6684 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6506 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5938 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (5267 - 5938, n=3)
5604 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4452 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4183 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points -35%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +232%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12630 Points +148%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5093 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (4666 - 5093, n=3)
4900 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4426 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4375 Points -14%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
1521 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (1244 - 1521, n=3)
1426 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1378 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1315 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1207 Points -21%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (21997 - 22589, n=3)
22359 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
21997 Points
Realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
21981 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
18000 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9167 Points -58%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7617 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4239 Points -81%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +195%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (8784 - 9429, n=3)
9033 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
8784 Points

由于Dimensity 1080继续使用相同的马里-G68 MP4的,所以亮度920作为图形芯片,小米手机在GFXBench和3DMark中的数值与realme 9 Pro Plus的数值相近,这并不令人惊讶。 realme 9 Pro Plus.与Poco F4的性能差异 Poco F4阿德雷诺650的性能差异甚至比CPU基准测试中更明显。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1218 Points +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
632 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points -44%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1207 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
643 Points
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
637 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points -44%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points -44%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4273 Points +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2287 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points -1%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2264 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1205 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4262 Points +88%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2294 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2273 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1211 Points -47%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1208 Points -47%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2811 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2763 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2701 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2689 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2676 Points -3%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4403 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4198 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3902 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2721 Points -35%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2692 Points -36%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3911 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3784 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3546 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2711 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2694 Points -29%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4411 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4211 Points -5%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3717 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3613 Points -18%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3241 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points -30%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10287 Points +134%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4400 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4387 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2988 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2967 Points -32%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7789 Points +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4362 Points
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4227 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3107 Points -29%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3024 Points -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -5%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps +72%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
107 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps -13%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -28%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -32%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -32%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +48%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps +67%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -26%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -26%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +91%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -23%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +81%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -30%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +121%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -14%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -14%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps -32%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps -32%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +85%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +103%
Realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -24%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -24%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps +113%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -23%

在上网时,红米手机以相当短的加载时间和流畅的操作体验给人留下深刻印象。 在基准测试中,Note 12 Pro的表现也相当出色。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +68%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)
96.94 Points +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (69.7 - 84.7, n=3)
75.4 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (Chrome 106)
72.259 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71.873 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
64.223 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points -12%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +117%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (62.2 - 73.7, n=3)
66.3 runs/min +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
62.9 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)
54.4 runs/min -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
38.7 runs/min -38%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +60%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (71 - 87, n=3)
77.3 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (chrome 106)
75 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
65 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Chrome 103)
46 Points -35%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (99 - 114, n=3)
105 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (chrome 103)
104 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
102 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
100 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)
34767 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
31662 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (25154 - 31839, n=3)
29552 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (chrome 106)
27593 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
21269 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
2013.3 ms * -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * -9%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (chrome 103)
1792.1 ms * -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (1747 - 1797, n=3)
1770 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
1766.4 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +11%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (chrome 106)
1501.9 ms * +15%

* ... smaller is better

在存储连接方面,变得很明显,Note 12 Pro去年已经在中国市场推出。小米智能手机在这里使用UFS 2.2和LPDDR4内存,考虑到竞争对手,这还算可以。小米智能手机中的UFS存储为存储类型提供了非常高的速度。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GMotorola Edge 30 NeoSamsung Galaxy A53Xiaomi Poco F4Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-31%
-38%
-27%
-5%
-27%
49%
Sequential Read 256KB
1008.8
523
-48%
498.82
-51%
510.1
-49%
1371.56
36%
Sequential Write 256KB
865.59
488.91
-44%
469.52
-46%
486.7
-44%
701.06
-19%
Random Read 4KB
241.83
204.3
-16%
180.19
-25%
229.9
-5%
183.61
-24%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
234.21
196.38
-16%
169.19
-28%
210.8
-10%
200.41
-14%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
-21%

游戏--小米智能手机达到120帧

虽然马里-G68 MP4这里使用的是基于Valhall架构的Mali-G68 MP4,已经有点老了,但其图形性能仍足以满足HFR游戏的需要--至少在老游戏中是这样。我们用我们的合作伙伴GameBench的工具来评估图形性能。.

我们的第一个测试游戏,PUBG Mobile,只能在中等细节设置(高清)下进行--你不能在Note 12 Pro上选择UHD设置--但射击游戏以非常稳定的40 fps再现。在最低的细节水平,它甚至达到了60帧。Asphalt 9 Legends也以30帧的速度非常均匀地再现,帧率没有任何下降。

Armajet被限制在120帧,这并不令人惊讶,因为小米智能手机的原生刷新率只有120赫兹。令人惊讶的是,竞技场射手以超过100帧的速度再现,没有任何较大波动。这种高水平的恒定性甚至在目前一些高端智能手机中都是缺乏的。

PUBG手机
PUBG手机
沥青9传奇
沥青9传奇
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G; Armajet: Ø112.8 (98-121)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.6 (58-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.8 (37-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.8 (37-41)

排放 - 一个很酷的Redmi Note 12 Pro

温度

小米宣传说,Redmi Note 12 Pro有12层石墨板冷却系统,确保日常操作中表面温度舒适。即使在持续的负载下,红米智能手机也只变得手热。

机箱内也没有真正的热量发展,这确保了联发科SoC的高性能恒定。3DMark的两项压力测试并没有显示出Dimensity 1080的任何热诱导节流现象。这款智能手机以大约99%的速度完成了基准测试。因此,我们也几乎可以排除在日常操作中,在某些应用程序的持续高要求下,任何明显的帧率下降。

Max. Load
 32.5 °C32.9 °C30.5 °C 
 32.6 °C31.6 °C30.1 °C 
 32.3 °C32.1 °C29.7 °C 
Maximum: 32.9 °C
Average: 31.6 °C
29 °C29.7 °C32 °C
28.8 °C29 °C31.3 °C
27.9 °C30 °C31.5 °C
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 29.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91.5 % -8%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Xiaomi Poco F4
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.8 % -12%
05101520Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.79 (3.79-3.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.17)
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø6.11 (6-6.84)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.6-13.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.23 (7.21-7.25)
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.9 (21.2-23.2)
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论
小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G智能手机评论

发言人

小米的这款中档智能手机提供了两个扬声器,其音质显示出均匀的中音,甚至还有一丝低音。高音也很平衡,尽管在超高频上有明显的下降。

Redmi Note 12 Pro的用户也不必没有3.5毫米的音频端口。但是,从音频端口发出的声音并不是特别干净,也不是噪音很低--我们测量的信噪比为69dBFS。那些喜欢无线连接的人可以使用蓝牙5.2。在编解码器方面,从aptX和aptX HD到AAC和LHDC直至LDAC,几乎所有东西都支持。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.634.1253025.83124.523.54025.825.65037.533.66325.229.18020.229.310020.429.412517.533.716014.445.520014.345.425015.253.631511.956.640013.557.650012.166.463012.467.380011.776100011.879.5125011.477160012.377.3200012.275.5250012.177.6315012.278.3400012.979.8500013.478.6630013.279.1800012.975.91000013.674.21250013.467.21600013.263.6SPL24.889.2N0.678.7median 12.9median 75.5Delta0.910.65338.644.538.433.728.833.434.535.837.630.128.621.323.52121.516.327.714.738.212.94514.351.21353.110.857.112.362.713.566.519.571.61578.514.177.914.97611.976.612.87615.472.616.573.216.767.517.272.31865.117.963.817.658.518.351.82886.10.962.1median 15median 65.12.210.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A53
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

消耗功率

Redmi Note 12 Pro的5,000毫安时电池可以在大约45分钟内使用附带的67瓦特充电器从空状态完全充电。不支持无线充电。

闲置运行时的低耗电量不是小米智能手机的优势之一。在超过2瓦的情况下,Note 12 Pro就会消耗相对较多的能量。另一方面,在负载条件下,消耗不太明显。 在我们的GFXBench和Geekbench测量中,小米智能手机甚至显示自己相对高效。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.99 / 2.03 / 2.08 Watt
Load midlight 3.97 / 5.85 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
4020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F4
4500 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
4%
20%
-0%
16%
4%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.99
0.96
3%
0.9
9%
0.9
9%
0.8
19%
0.927 ?(0.69 - 1.1, n=3)
6%
Idle Average *
2.03
2.31
-14%
1.55
24%
1.3
36%
1.29
36%
1.68 ?(1.4 - 2.03, n=3)
17%
Idle Maximum *
2.08
2.34
-13%
1.56
25%
1.6
23%
1.38
34%
Load Average *
3.97
2.88
27%
2.82
29%
5.7
-44%
3.78
5%
4.06 ?(3.97 - 4.2, n=3)
-2%
Load Maximum *
5.85
4.88
17%
4.97
15%
7.3
-25%
6.71
-15%
6.45 ?(5.85 - 7, n=3)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.64 (1.076-6.72)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.03 (4.38-10.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.193 (1.084-1.374)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.129 (0.898-1.623)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.95 (2.62-3.28)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.55 (7.22-9.66)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.193 (1.084-1.374)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.129 (0.898-1.623)

电池寿命

在我们的视频测试中,在150cd/m2的调整亮度下,这款中端智能手机持续了将近17.5个小时,这和它的前辈一样长。通过我们的模拟网络冲浪,Redmi Note 12 Pro也达到了非常好的16小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 38min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 59min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
4020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F4
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
17%
-26%
9%
-19%
Reader / Idle
1598
2366
48%
2431
52%
1342
-16%
H.264
1043
1030
-1%
1146
10%
929
-11%
WiFi v1.3
978
788
-19%
721
-26%
886
-9%
665
-32%
Load
299
415
39%
246
-18%
246
-18%

Pros

+ 明亮的AMOLED面板
+ 美丽的显示(120赫兹,低色彩偏差)
+ 快速充电功能+充电器
+ 良好的设备
+ 有吸引力的主摄像头,带OIS

Cons

- 更新时间表
- 缓慢的USB标准
- 缺乏存储扩展
- 只有IP53认证
- 高光泽度的表面

对Redmi Note 12 Pro的评价

测试Redmi Note 12 Pro。测试装置由德国小米公司提供。
测试Redmi Note 12 Pro。测试装置由德国小米公司提供。

Redmi Note 12 Pro是一个成功的升级版。 Note 11 Pro,光看数据表,我们不一定能想到。虽然主摄像头只提供了5千万像素的分辨率,但光学防抖的索尼图像传感器使其成为一款价格低于400欧元(约440美元)的中端智能手机的非常好的整体包装,特别是你最终可以以UHD质量录制视频。

但Redmi Note 12 Pro在相机性能之外还有很多优点:快速的Wi-Fi 6,长的电池寿命,明亮的AMOLED面板,120赫兹的刷新率,低热开发,坚实的SoC,以及快速充电。我们还想提及另一个积极点,那就是小米在盒子里包括一个相应的67瓦的充电器。那些在这个价格段需要更多计算能力的人可以看一下Poco F4搭配 高通骁龙870 - 特别是因为Poco的兄弟姐妹机型提供了更快的LPDDR5和UFS 3.1的存储标准。

Note 12 Pro在一款中档智能手机中提供了强大的技术。但小米智能手机的买家必须权衡硬件方面的积极因素和产品周期短的问题。

我们对薄弱的软件支持有所不满:一个建议零售价为400欧元的智能手机的买家肯定应该能够在2023年期待更多。一个Android 12的设备只有两个大的Android 更新,这已经不符合当前的标准,也不太符合环境的可持续发展。三星通过其Galaxy A34 ,展示了事情可以做得更好。

另一个令人遗憾的地方是取消了存储扩展,只有 "普通 "Redmi Note 12仍然提供这个功能。

价格和可用性

例如,Redmi Note 12 Pro可从亚马逊购买,起价324美元

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G - 04/17/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
94%
Games Performance
46 / 64 → 72%
Application Performance
76 / 86 → 88%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
69%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G评测 - 旗舰级的超薄5G智能手机与OIS?
Marcus Herbrich, 2023-04-24 (Update: 2024-08-15)