Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A35 5G 评测--功能强大的全能型产品，采用Galaxy S 设计，售价不到 300 美元

附加值。

Galaxy A35 是三星推出的一款功能强大的智能手机。这款广受欢迎的Galaxy A 系列的最新中端机型以经济实惠的价格提供了丰富的功能，并在一些方面比上一代产品做得更好。除了更强的处理能力和 eSIM 支持外，它还首次配备了高级玻璃外壳，就像Galaxy S 机型所采用的设计语言一样。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
三星Galaxy A35 5G

三星的中端产品Galaxy A 系列因其极具吸引力的性价比而广受欢迎，制造商每年都会对其进行更新。从技术角度看，变化大多很少，但是，在年轻化进程的帮助下，智能手机仍然能够在前进的道路上获得众多改进。三星Galaxy A35 也是如此。

在功能和性能方面，Galaxy A35 目前在Galaxy A 系列中排名第二，紧随顶级机型 Galaxy A55.在 SoC 方面，这款候选机型甚至能够达到曾经的顶级水平。采用了 Exynos 1380Galaxy A35 采用了与去年Galaxy A 旗舰产品 Galaxy A54.

在外观上，Galaxy A35 也进行了多项改进。尤其是在外壳方面，变化很大。

good (86%) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380ARM Mali-G68 MP5 Smartphone - 05/03/2024 - v7
Test device courtesy of Samsung Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Galaxy A30 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1380 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.60 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 390 PPI, capacitive, Super AMOLED, FHD+, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 103.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Fingerprint Sensor, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Virtual Proximity Sensing, eSIM, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung Smart Switch, Head SAR 0.436 W/kg, Body SAR 0.917 W/kg
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 161.7 x 78
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, 10x digital zoom) + 8 MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 1.12 µm) + 5 MP macro (f/2.4); video recording up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, 1.12µm; video recording up to 4K@30fps)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, One UI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, wired charging up to 25W, fanless, waterproof
Weight
209 g
Price
379 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
85.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2340x1080
82.2 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Motorola Moto G84
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		166.8 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86.9 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Nothing Phone (2a)
Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4		190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1084
84.9 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4		199 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2340x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530		213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
86.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6		186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220

与上一代产品相比，Galaxy A35 的外壳质量有了质的飞跃。无论是视觉效果还是材料外观，它都与价格更高的Galaxy S 系列智能手机相当接近。

与 Galaxy A34不同的是，它的背板现在由玻璃而不是塑料制成，Super AMOLED 显示屏由大猩猩玻璃 Victus+ 保护，而不是以前使用的大猩猩玻璃 5。显示屏边框也变得更加纤薄。三星继续使用塑料作为外壳边框。玻璃升级的唯一缺点是：在尺寸几乎相同的情况下，Galaxy A35 的重量为 209 克，明显重于前代产品。

自拍摄像头在设计上有了一些改进。Galaxy A34 的摄像头位于水滴形凹槽内，而Galaxy A35 则采用了更为现代的冲孔设计。与前代产品一样，这款做工精良、性能稳定的候选产品通过了 IP67 认证，具有防水和防尘功能。

三星为Galaxy A35 提供四种非常低调的外壳颜色。除了我们的评测机型 Awesome Navy 外，还有粉色系的 Awesome Ice、Awesome Lemon 和 Awesome Lilac 可供选择。

三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G 配有
三星Galaxy A35 5G 炫冰配色
三星Galaxy A35 5G 配有
三星Galaxy A35 5G 炫紫丁香配色版

尺寸比较

❌
161.74 mm 76.32 mm 8.55 mm 190 g161.7 mm 78 mm 8.2 mm 209 g161.3 mm 78.1 mm 8.2 mm 199 g161.1 mm 77.4 mm 8.2 mm 213 g160.45 mm 74.34 mm 8.25 mm 186 g160 mm 74.4 mm 7.6 mm 166.8 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 -Galaxy A35 最高配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间

三星的这款中档智能手机有两种存储版本。128 GB 入门级版本提供 6 GB 内存，三星在线商店售价 399 美元。Galaxy A35 的较大版本售价 449 美元，配备 256 GB 存储空间，并自动装入 8 GB 内存。

通过使用 microSD 卡，内部存储空间最多可扩展至 1 TB，应用程序数据也可外发到该卡上。如果不使用 microSD 卡，还可以在插槽中插入两张 2 nano SIM 卡。与 Galaxy A34不同的是，eSIM 卡也可以激活。

在常规功能方面，与前代产品相比，没有任何变化。USB-C 2.0、蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和立体声扬声器继续搭载，DRM Widevine L1 还支持高清流媒体。Camera2 API 的运行支持水平有限。如果您安装第三方相机应用程序，它们只能有限地访问相机的功能。

左：无端口
左：无端口
右：音量摇杆、功能键
右：音量摇杆、功能键
顶部：双 SIM 卡/microSD 插槽、麦克风
顶部：双 SIM 卡/microSD 插槽、麦克风
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、麦克风
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、麦克风

microSD 读卡器

Galaxy A35 的读卡器在使用我们的 microSD 参考卡 Angelbird AV Pro V60 时，数据传输速度对于一款中端智能手机来说非常出色。特别是，它比 Galaxy A34的读卡器要好得多。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
55.32 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
53.26 MB/s -4%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
48.5 MB/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
44.01 MB/s -20%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.8 (25.4-57.9)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (22-43.6)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.6 (28.3-52.1)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (38.1-99.5)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70 (39.2-78.2)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (44.1-101.9)

软件 -Android 14 和 5 年更新

三星为Galaxy A35 配备了Android 14 和自制的 One UI 6.1 用户界面。该制造商以长期更新为卖点。Galaxy A35 承诺接受长达 4 年的操作系统升级，使其能够享受Android 18。三星的目标是在 5 年内推出安全补丁。

除了必备的谷歌和三星工具外，Galaxy A35 的软件功能还包括密码保险箱、三星 Knox，遗憾的是，还有不少臃肿的软件。不过，如有必要，Facebook、Spotify、Temu 等应用程序，《糖果粉碎传奇》等游戏或 OneDrive 或 LinkedIn 等微软工具都可以删除。

三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy A35 的 WiFi 6

与上一代产品不同的是，三星为Galaxy A35 提供了更广泛的移动通信频率，几乎在任何地方都能获得信号。不过，说来说去，差别还是很小的。与 Galaxy A34不同的是，A35 还支持 LTE 频段 25 以及 5G 频段 5 和 66。

Galaxy A35 还提供更多的 Wi-Fi 功能。它配备了 WiFi 6，而前代产品只配备了 WiFi 5。配合我们的华硕 ROG Rapture AXE1100 参考路由器，这款智能手机在发送和接收数据时的传输速度非常稳定，达到了约 830 MBits/s，帮助它跻身中级前列。相比之下，Galaxy A34 的传输速度则没有超过 679 MBit/s。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
830 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G84
iperf3 receive AXE11000
326 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 334) MBit/s ∼43%
Nothing Phone (2a)
iperf3 receive AXE11000
782 (min: 633) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
680 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
872 (min: 464) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
914 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
634 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
679 (min: 653) MBit/s ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼88%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (758-851)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (610-642)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (780-913)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø679 (653-709)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

Galaxy A35 通过卫星导航服务 GPS (L1)、Glonass (L1)、Galileo (E1)、Beidou (B1, B1C) 和 QZSS (L1) 确定自己的位置。在测试中，它的精度高达 2 米。

这款智能手机出色地通过了实际测试，证明自己非常适合导航任务。除了一些微小的偏差，Galaxy A35 非常准确地记录了一条 10 公里的自行车旅行路线。这使它与 Garmin Vent 2 健身智能手表一样准确，后者也是为了进行比较而随行的。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：环湖航行
GPS 测试：环湖航行
GPS 测试：转折点
GPS 测试：转折点

电话功能和语音质量 - 支持 eSIM

Galaxy A35 的混合 SIM 卡插槽可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡或一张 nano SIM 卡和一张容量高达 1TB 的 microSD 卡。此外，您还可以激活 eSIM 卡。此外，还支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。

Galaxy A35 在我们的测试中提供了良好的语音质量。在拨打固定电话和移动网络测试电话时，主叫方和接听方都能清楚地听懂对方的话。在较大的环境中，环境噪声抑制功能也发挥了很好的作用。在免提模式下，通话清晰度仍然很高，但声音听起来有些发闷。

摄像头 - 三摄像头几乎与前代产品相同

自拍相机图像
自拍相机图像

在摄像头设置方面，与去年相比变化不大。虽然自拍摄像头从水滴形凹槽改为了冲孔式，但它仍然可以拍摄 1300 万像素的照片，视频录制也与主摄像头相同，最高可达 4K 和每秒 30 帧。与 Galaxy A34，良好的图像画质也没有改变。在人像模式下，自拍摄像头可呈现迷人的虚化效果，照片色彩浓郁，不会显得夸张。

后置三摄像头仍然由 3 个镜头组成，规格几乎完全相同。只有主摄像头进行了小幅升级，从以前的 4800 万像素升级到现在的 5000 万像素。 其他一切照旧。主摄像头采用 f/1.8 光圈，通过 4 合 1 像素二进制技术拍摄 1200 万像素照片。此外，还有一个 800 万像素超广角摄像头（f/2.2）和一个 500 万像素微距摄像头（f/2.4）。

在日光下，主摄像头拍摄的照片非常漂亮，而且具有三星典型的高饱和度。这使得照片看起来既明亮又生动--这可不是每个人都喜欢的。强烈的对比度赋予照片极大的活力，尽管在较暗的图像区域看不到太多的对比度。

在夜间，这款相机的表现也令人印象深刻，与许多其他中端智能手机相比，它捕捉的色彩相当逼真。由于没有变焦镜头，要接近拍摄对象就必须使用数码变焦。在放大 2 倍的情况下，它仍能提供相对可接受的效果，但超过 2 倍后，图像很快就会变得模糊。

主摄像头能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制 4K 视频，并配有光学图像稳定器。这样的组合在中端产品中并不多见。如果切换到 1080p，则可以达到每秒 60 帧。

与主摄像头一样，超广角摄像头也能拍摄出良好的图像，然后由相机软件进行色彩还原。但图像并不特别清晰，在较暗的图像区域很快就会出现噪点。500 万像素微距摄像头可在距离拍摄对象 3 至 5 厘米的范围内工作，并能拍摄出不错的图像。不过，后者的数码变焦功能是主摄像头所无法实现的。

超广角相机图像
超广角相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像（2 倍变焦）
主相机图像（2 倍变焦）
主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight image 1Daylight image 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLowlight image

最后，我们在受控照明条件下仔细观察了主摄像头。在最佳照明条件下，色彩捕捉准确（Delta E 最大值为 10.47），测试图表显示清晰。在 1 勒克斯的弱光条件下，图像明显变暗，但图表本身及其颜色仍然清晰可见。

ColorChecker
4 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: 4.56 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 10.47 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.2 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
42 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
54.7 ∆E
30 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
59.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
59.7 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: 40.6 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 61.06 ∆E

配件和保修 - Samsung Care+ 作为可选附加保险

三星Galaxy A35 的包装盒内包括一根 USB 线、一个 SIM 卡工具、一份快速指南和一本保修手册。这款智能手机最高支持 25 瓦充电。三星提供兼容的充电器，但目前在其网上商店还买不到。

Galaxy A35 提供 24 个月的保修服务。Samsung Care+ 可以作为补充。保险套餐作为补充，该套餐的有效期长达两年，并包括可选的失窃保障。Galaxy A35 的 Samsung Care+ 保险价格为每月 8 美元至 129 美元（2 年计划，一次性支付），具体价格取决于所选的费率。

输入设备和操作 - 始终开启的显示屏和可配置的功能键

Galaxy A35 的触摸屏反应灵敏，响应时间为 120 Hz，操作起来非常流畅。同时，振动电机安静运行，提供精确的触觉反馈。Always-On 屏幕永久显示时间、电池电量等信息，如果需要，还可以显示通知。

默认情况下，手机壳右侧的功能键会打开 Bixby 助手，但也可以在设置中将其还原为传统的电源按钮。按两次功能键可打开相机或首选应用。如果只有一只手空闲，单手使用智能手机也很舒适。这样，显示屏的宽度和高度都缩小了约三分之一。

光学指纹传感器负责生物识别安全，一次性保存的指纹随后会被准确识别。同样，也可以通过自拍摄像头进行二维人脸识别，虽然速度更快，但安全性也较低。

键盘景观
键盘景观
键盘肖像
键盘肖像

显示屏 - 超过 1700 尼特的 Super AMOLED 显示屏

子像素
子像素

Galaxy A35 的显示屏非常亮丽。在纯白背景下，我们测得的平均亮度为 912.4 cd/m²，高于平均水平。作为对比：A34 的显示屏亮度为 929.9 cd/m²。 Galaxy A34的亮度几乎相同。

在明暗显示区域均匀分布的情况下（APL18 测量），面板亮度再次显著增加，可以显示高达 1563 cd/m² 的 SDR 内容（Galaxy A34：1544 cd/m²），甚至可以显示高达 1796 cd/m² 的 HDR 内容。在最低亮度设置下，亮度降至 1.51 cd/m²。

在任何亮度设置下，Super AMOLED 显示屏都会以约 240 Hz 的频率持续闪烁。敏感的用户在这方面可能会有怨言。Galaxy A35 不提供直流调光模式。

914
cd/m²		913
cd/m²		913
cd/m²
914
cd/m²		904
cd/m²		913
cd/m²
913
cd/m²		899
cd/m²		929
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 929 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 912.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 904 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Motorola Moto G84
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"		Nothing Phone (2a)
AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
1%
18%
-11%
13%
24%
Brightness middle
904
894
-1%
1033
14%
922
2%
962
6%
1034
14%
Brightness
912
889
-3%
1042
14%
930
2%
967
6%
1035
13%
Brightness Distribution
97
94
-3%
96
-1%
98
1%
99
2%
96
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
1.1
48%
1.6
24%
2.5
-19%
1.6
24%
1.1
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
2.81
-0%
2.5
11%
3.6
-29%
2.6
7%
1.9
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
3
-36%
1.2
45%
2.7
-23%
1.5
32%
1.4
36%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.252 98%
2.07 106%
2.09 105%
2.13 103%
2.22 99%
CCT
6478 100%
7122 91%
6482 100%
6661 98%
6382 102%
6674 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行了一系列测量（在最低亮度下，振幅曲线显得非常平缓，但这是缩放造成的。振幅曲线看起来非常平坦，但这是缩放造成的）。在信息框中，您可以看到最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

三星对其中档智能手机的显示屏进行了很好的校准。从预装的 "鲜艳"模式切换到 "自然"模式，并将白平衡设置为中等，Delta E < 3 时，Super AMOLED 显示屏的色彩偏差超出了可感知的范围。

色彩精度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.831 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.902 ms rise
↘ 0.929 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.298 ms rise
↘ 1.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

即使在阳光下，也能在明亮的显示屏上轻松阅读内容。由于 Super AMOLED 显示屏的最大亮度仅为 420 cd/m²，因此任何希望手动设置亮度的人都无法从稳定视角的显示屏上获得最大亮度。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用（阴凉处）
室外使用（阴凉处）
视角
视角

性能 -Galaxy A35 采用三星 Exynos 1380 处理器。

三星为Galaxy A35 配备了 三星Exynos 1380去年的Galaxy A 顶级机型，即 Galaxy A54.在 2024 年，这颗八核 SoC 的性能非常稳定，帮助我们的评测机型实现了强大的日常性能，只是偶尔会出现卡顿。

在合成基准测试中，Galaxy A35 与 A55 保持着可观的距离。 Galaxy A55不过，其领先优势并不是特别大。在与 Galaxy A34总的来说，A35 与Galaxy A35 的差距并不大。不过，在人工智能基准测试中，前代产品的得分明显更高，这要归功于它的 联发科 Dimensity 1080处理器。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=161, last 2 years)
1446 Points +42%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1424 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points +14%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (1011 - 1023, n=4)
1016 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
911 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4547 Points +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=161, last 2 years)
4028 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (2858 - 2906, n=4)
2882 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
2058 Points -29%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1085 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points +14%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
890 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
783 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
782 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (771 - 788, n=5)
781 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
674 Points -14%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4279 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2778 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (2719 - 2817, n=5)
2761 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2315 Points -17%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2177 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
1839 Points -34%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1465265 Points +143%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=98, last 2 years)
1232320 Points +104%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (434759 - 602612, n=4)
551885 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
461567 Points -23%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14716 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (11259 - 13488, n=5)
12568 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
11732 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11721 Points -13%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points -19%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
987 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points +21%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
695 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (637 - 703, n=5)
665 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
657 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7122 Points +61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (4416 - 4666, n=5)
4501 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3850 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
3767 Points -15%
System
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
12177 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (8843 - 9016, n=5)
8932 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
8231 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7182 Points -19%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points -24%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7784 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5267 Points +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (4301 - 4857, n=5)
4607 Points +7%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
4179 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -4%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +140%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
16594 Points +136%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (7031 - 7126, n=5)
7072 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4666 Points -34%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
4346 Points -38%
Web
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1636 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (1334 - 1533, n=5)
1409 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
1348 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1244 Points -12%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -38%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
64597 Points +979%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points +340%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
22490 Points +276%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +181%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (5835 - 6152, n=5)
6012 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
5758 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -13%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
33858 Points +6112%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +4647%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
11407 Points +1993%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
9429 Points +1630%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (545 - 647, n=5)
605 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
585 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
478 Points -12%

正如 GPU 基准测试所示，其 ARM Mali G68 MP5图形处理器，Galaxy A35 还可以流畅地玩对图形要求更高的游戏。与竞争对手相比，A35 的情况与合成基准测试类似，中游水平是该设备所能提供的最佳性能。A55 Galaxy A55一直领先候选机型几格，但也不得不承认输给了 小米 Poco X6 Pro 5G在同类产品中表现最佳。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3085 Points +288%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1156 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
622 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points -56%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3068 Points +279%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1153 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
640 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11204 Points +301%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4259 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2796 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2220 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1193 Points -57%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4140 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3897 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2820 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2279 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1203 Points -57%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6342 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5850 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4391 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4047 Points -8%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4006 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3506 Points -20%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13159 Points +157%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points +40%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6935 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5118 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4406 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2968 Points -42%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10622 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6828 Points +38%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5966 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4936 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4321 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3073 Points -38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
89 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps -12%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
462 fps +292%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps -10%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps -21%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +76%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +171%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +149%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps +227%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -35%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +228%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -8%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -32%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +267%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -13%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps +230%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +300%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.8 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +203%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +60%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -13%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps +297%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -38%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps +314%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps -19%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.5 fps -40%

在上网方面，Galaxy A35 表现出色，能快速加载复杂的网站，在基准测试中也处于中等水平。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
134.031 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (94.6 - 119.6, n=5)
107.2 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
102.69 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
69.688 Points -39%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
180 runs/min +73%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +31%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min +12%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (70.5 - 104, n=4)
86.7 runs/min -17%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
72.6 runs/min -30%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
62.2 runs/min -40%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
140 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (97 - 123, n=5)
109.6 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
107 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
74 Points -40%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
185 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
157 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
156 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
145 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
135 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (124 - 145, n=3)
131.3 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
114 Points -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
46286 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (33801 - 36155, n=5)
35093 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
30733 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
25154 Points -30%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
1796.7 ms * -63%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * -43%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -43%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
1309.3 ms * -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1099 - 1209, n=5)
1159 ms * -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * +8%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
1007.2 ms * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy A35 采用 UFS 2.2 存储系统，数据传输速度稳定，加载时间相对较短。然而，它落后于竞争对手，不得不让位给 Galaxy A55和 Galaxy A34它们的内存控制器工作效率更高。

Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMotorola Moto G84Nothing Phone (2a)Samsung Galaxy A34 5GSamsung Galaxy A55 5GXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
61%
189%
92%
146%
641%
77%
271%
Sequential Read 256KB
529.32
506.9
-4%
1028.37
94%
887.41
68%
1688.53
219%
3824.7
623%
728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71)
38%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
247%
Sequential Write 256KB
270
511.5
89%
952
253%
494.67
83%
831.44
208%
3642.57
1249%
527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71)
95%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
428%
Random Read 4KB
244.24
195.8
-20%
273.19
12%
216.75
-11%
351.47
44%
355.7
46%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
-22%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
13%
Random Write 4KB
62.59
174.7
179%
311.8
398%
206.14
229%
132.11
111%
467.74
647%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
197%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
394%

游戏 - 60fps 是例外

Galaxy A35 在游戏测试中表现出色，即使在较高的图形设置下也能流畅运行游戏。

不过，60fps 或更高的高帧率是个例外，通常只有在你可以不使用某些图形细节的情况下才有可能实现。Gamebench测试显示，Galaxy A35 仍然表现出色。在高清设置下，《PUBG Mobile》以接近 40fps 的速度运行，帧数没有任何下降。在最高图形细节下，《源氏冲击》也运行良好，在渲染要求不高的环境时，有时甚至能达到 50fps。总之，使用 Gamebench，我们在这里测得的平均帧数也接近 40fps。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G; Genshin Impact; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø39.7 (31-56)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G; PUBG Mobile; 3.1.0: Ø39.8 (32-41)

排放 -Galaxy A35 具有良好的立体声扬声器

温度

通过 "Burnout "基准测试，我们考察了Galaxy A35 处理持续负载的能力。在进行了整整一个小时的苛刻基准测试后，Galaxy A35 的表面温度升至 42 度以上，手持智能手机时可以明显感觉到这一温度。不过，从散热的角度来看，这完全是无害的，是测试场景的结果，在现实生活中不太可能发生。

就内部而言，持续的压力无法对Galaxy A35 造成任何影响，它几乎总能充分发挥其性能。这一点在 3DMark Wild Life 压力测试中可以看出，该测试证明智能手机接近 100% 稳定。

Max. Load
 41.3 °C40.7 °C34.6 °C 
 42.1 °C42.3 °C38.3 °C 
 42.1 °C40.8 °C37.2 °C 
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 39.9 °C
32.6 °C40.2 °C38 °C
35.5 °C37.9 °C42 °C
34.6 °C38.6 °C42.5 °C
Maximum: 42.5 °C
Average: 38 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +2%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +2%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 %
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.7 % -20%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % -33%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.2 %
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.89 (6.88-6.91)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.83 (3.82-3.84)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (12-18)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.6-24.8)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.6 (13.6-13.6)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.4 (43.6-55.4)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.4 (11-16.9)
三星Galaxy A35 5G
三星Galaxy A35 5G

发言人

Galaxy A35 的立体声扬声器音量为 90.6 dB(A)，即使在最大音量下也能发出均衡的中高音，听起来相当震撼。虽然几乎没有低音，但声音还原得非常好。

如果希望获得更好的音效，则应通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 将智能手机连接到耳机等外置音频设备。Galaxy A35 在蓝牙音频编解码器方面比较吝啬，只有 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和三星的无缝编解码器 (SSC) 提供相对较少的选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.329.42526.238.63125.935.34029.235.85035.633.66325.938.58022.137.710017.840.712517.144.316018.153.920014.252.225014.156.331510.757.34001157.350012.863.563011.161.58001268.7100011.775.212501280.3160012.878.5200012.480.6250012.381.7315013.380.640001382500013.580.2630013.277.8800013.8751000013.774.31250013.470.31600013.362.5SPL24.990.9N0.681.3median 13.2median 74.3Delta111.629.638.33031.824.532.925.831.937.538.725.232.320.235.420.435.717.54214.453.314.352.515.255.411.957.913.560.612.162.112.460.611.766.111.873.811.476.712.378.212.279.212.179.512.281.312.981.713.481.713.27812.974.713.674.313.47213.260.824.890.40.678.5median 12.9median 73.80.910.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Galaxy A34 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 - 充电功率高达 25 瓦

耗电量

在负载情况下，Galaxy A35 的表现相当经济，但在日常情况下通常比前代产品更耗电。

这款智能手机的充电功率可达 25 瓦，在测试中，其 5000 毫安时电池充满电需要约 1 小时 45 分钟。达到 50% 的电量需要 36 分钟，70% 需要 57 分钟，85% 需要 1 小时 29 分钟。由于这款智能手机没有配备充电器，我们使用了一个 Ugreen 65 瓦适配器为设备充电。

Galaxy A35 不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.89 / 1.99 / 2.14 Watt
Load midlight 4.57 / 12.31 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G84
5000 mAh		Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Average Samsung Exynos 1380
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
28%
11%
24%
9%
-26%
-43%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
1
-12%
0.81
9%
0.69
22%
0.85
4%
1.11
-25%
1.068 ?(0.75 - 1.37, n=5)
-20%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.99
1.3
35%
2.01
-1%
1.61
19%
1.51
24%
1.14
43%
3.04 ?(1.5 - 5.37, n=5)
-53%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
27%
Idle Maximum *
2.14
1.4
35%
2.07
3%
1.66
22%
1.71
20%
1.16
46%
3.18 ?(1.62 - 5.44, n=5)
-49%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
4.57
3.5
23%
4.16
9%
4.01
12%
4.87
-7%
12.33
-170%
8.77 ?(3.6 - 15.8, n=5)
-92%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-41%
Load Maximum *
12.31
5
59%
7.91
36%
6.5
47%
11.73
5%
15.34
-25%
12.6 ?(8.93 - 15.9, n=5)
-2%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
20%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (1.191-10.8)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.94 (1.008-7.97)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.37 (1.064-10.1)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.038-1.308)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (3.89-5.98)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.12 (2.67-3.43)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.99-5.9)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.038-1.308)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

电池寿命

Galaxy A35 配备了 5000 毫安时电池，续航能力出色。在模拟上网过程中，该设备的续航时间为 15 小时，而连续循环播放高清视频的续航时间为 23 小时。竞争对手的成绩也相当接近。不过，在与 Galaxy A34在与 A34 的直接比较中，评测对象不得不做出一些让步，因为总体而言，它的续航能力略胜一筹。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
43h 20min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 22min
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G84
5000 mAh		Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
7%
19%
-1%
-15%
Reader / Idle
2600
1997
-23%
2522
-3%
2975
14%
2202
-15%
1815
-30%
H.264
1401
1002
-28%
1513
8%
1363
-3%
1511
8%
967
-31%
WiFi v1.3
902
908
1%
1011
12%
1024
14%
1077
19%
942
4%
Load
262
277
6%
293
12%
395
51%
220
-16%
251
-4%

Pros

+ 高级表壳，玻璃背板
+ 良好的日常性能
+ 明亮的 120 Hz Super AMOLED 显示屏
+ Android 14 项长期更新
+ 良好的主摄像头
+ 电池续航时间长

Cons

- 最大充电功率 25 瓦
- 无无线充电功能
- 预装臃肿软件
- 蓝牙编解码器数量少

结论 - 三星Galaxy A35

评论：SamsungGalaxy A35 5G。评测设备由三星德国公司和数码港提供。
评论：SamsungGalaxy A35 5G。评测设备由三星德国公司和数码港提供。

三星Galaxy A35 的表现与Apple 智能手机类似。每年，它们都会更新换代，增加一些新的功能，而已经拥有去年机型的人则不一定需要更换，因为这些创新很难让人信服。但是，如果你的旧款智能手机已经用了几年，情况就不同了。因为，这样的机会值得抓住，让技术与时俱进。

三星Galaxy A35 与前代产品有所不同，但仅限于细节方面。它采用了速度稍快的 SoC，支持 eSIM，并配备了Android 14 而不是Android 13。对于Galaxy 的升级用户来说，它尤其吸引人的是其新颖的设计和高档的材料，这使它在视觉和触觉上更接近Galaxy S 系列。

客观地看待其技术规格，跳出三星的范畴，总体而言，Galaxy A35 仍然给人留下了积极的印象。Galaxy A35 是一款功能强大的中端智能手机，尽管现在的售价约为 330 美元，但它仍具有很高的性价比。它不仅拥有明亮的 Super AMOLED 显示屏、出色的摄像头和良好的电池续航能力，而且还能享受长时间的更新、稳定的日常性能和高档的设计。

三星Galaxy A35 不仅功能强大、价格诱人，而且还拥有高品质的设计。

在某些方面，三星智能手机的更新有点过于保守。例如，充电速度与上一代产品相同，仅限于相当缓慢的 25 瓦。此外，该机没有无线充电功能，One UI 6.1 中仍有不少臃肿的软件。

Galaxy A35 的替代品：在其他设备中，你还可以通过以下设备获得 120 Hz 的显示屏和良好的性能 摩托罗拉 Moto G84和 小米 Poco X6 Pro 5G这两款手机的售价均低于 300 美元。除此之外，小米智能手机的 SoC 速度明显更快，这也为其加分不少。

价格和可用性

Galaxy A35 在Samsung的在线商店上的价格为 399 美元，如果您购买的是存储容量为 8/128 GB 的较小版本。现在，这个价格已被其他在线商店大幅压低。同时，8/128 GB 版本在亚马逊上的售价约为 329 美元。

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G - 05/03/2024 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
55 / 70 → 78%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
92%
Games Performance
50 / 64 → 78%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
71%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A35 5G 评测--功能强大的全能型产品，采用Galaxy S 设计，售价不到 300 美元
Manuel Masiero, 2024-05- 7 (Update: 2024-08-15)