Notebookcheck Logo

华硕TUF游戏A15笔记本评测--拥有RTX4050和144Hz屏幕的预算玩家

对1080p来说是完美的。

华硕的TUF Gaming A15由于采用了AMD Ryzen处理器和GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop,在1080p下提供了良好的游戏性能。它的144-Hz IPS面板看起来也很棒。那么,这是一个完美的预算游戏机吗?
AMD Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook Windows

位于ROG系列之下,华硕的TUF游戏系列旨在为游戏玩家提供更便宜的笔记本电脑选择。我们最近测试了16英寸模型与AMD硬件现在是时候看看15英寸的版本了:配备AMD处理器(Ryzen 7 7735HS)的TUF Gaming A15。Ryzen 7 7735HS)和当前的Nvidia显卡(GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop).它的MRSP约为1,300美元,目前可以在网上找到,价格为1,169美元。此外,该设备有一个刷新率为144赫兹的哑光IPS面板,16GB内存和512GB NVMe SSD。FA507NU-LP031的零售版没有操作系统,但我们收到时已经安装了Windows 11 Home。

Asus TUF A15 FA507
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 8 x 3.2 - 4.8 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-HS Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 2355 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 95 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 531.68, Advanced Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 64 GB
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, N156HMA-GA1, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, 512 GB 
, 420 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.9 x 354 x 251
Battery
90 Wh, 5675 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 240W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.154 kg, Power Supply: 735 g
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Asus TUF A15 FA507
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.8 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2 kg23.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.9 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg23 mm15.60"2560x1440
82.9 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
81 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23.6 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg24.95 mm15.60"1920x1080

案例--低调的游戏笔记本,没有照明

与其采用英特尔处理器的前代产品相比,TUF Gaming F15,这款笔记本的外壳设计几乎没有变化。只有一些小的区别,如WASD键不再是白色的,盖子的四个角现在有小条而不是圆圈。目前的型号仍然没有任何花哨的照明功能,总的来说,这款笔记本电脑采用了相当低调的深灰色外观。特别是沿着屏幕的底边相当大,因为笔记本电脑仍然采用16:9的比例。你很可能需要经常清洁它的深色表面,因为它们很容易收集指纹印。

笔记本电脑的盖子是由金属制成的,箱子的其余部分是塑料。底部装置足够稳定,但你可以很容易地推到键盘的中间。虽然,当你试图扭动和弯曲设备时,它不会发出任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。它的薄盖子不是最好的,因为当你用很小的压力压住它或试图改变打开角度(最大~135度)时,屏幕已经开始出现干扰了。

从尺寸上看,所有的竞争对手都很相似--但TUF Gaming A15拥有最小的蓝图。它的重量刚刚超过2.1公斤,使笔记本电脑相对便携,你很可能会把它装进大多数背包或袋子里。附带的240瓦电源的重量为额外的735克。

尺寸比较

360 mm 266 mm 26 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 238 mm 23.9 mm 2 kg359 mm 259 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 243 mm 23 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 255 mm 23.6 mm 2.3 kg354.9 mm 251.9 mm 24.95 mm 2.1 kg354 mm 251 mm 24.9 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 华硕已经包括了USB 4

基本单元的后面部分被冷却装置占据,几乎所有的端口都位于设备的左侧。只有一个USB端口在右侧。如果你使用所有的端口,空间可能会变得有点紧张。有两个USB-C端口,其中一个支持USB 4.0,另一个支持G-Sync,如果你连接一个相应的显示器。

左侧:电源、以太网、HDMI 2.1 FRL、USB-C 4.0(40 GBit/s、DisplayPort、Power Delivery)、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2(10 GBit/s、Power Delivery、DisplayPort、G-Sync)、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s)、3.5耳机插孔
左侧:电源、以太网、HDMI 2.1 FRL、USB-C 4.0(40 GBit/s、DisplayPort、Power Delivery)、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2(10 GBit/s、Power Delivery、DisplayPort、G-Sync)、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s)、3.5耳机插孔
对:USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s),Kensington安全端口
对:USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s),Kensington安全端口

沟通

除了千兆以太网端口外,该笔记本电脑还使用了联发科MT7921无线局域网模块,支持Wi-Fi 6和160-MHz频段的连接。然而,其最大传输速率为1200比特/秒。在我们使用华硕的参考路由器进行的测试中,这些速率得到了证实,虽然它们是体面的,但市场上肯定有更快的WLAN模块。在一天结束时,这不应该在日常使用中造成任何问题(例如,在下载内容时)。

Networking
Asus TUF A15 FA507
MediaTek MT7921
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
985 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
917 (min: 797) MBit/s ∼54%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1622 (min: 823) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1686 (min: 1451) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
979 (min: 901) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
952 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
980 (min: 495) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
934 (min: 918) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1529 (min: 623) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1666 (min: 840) MBit/s ∼99%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
MediaTek MT7921
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
816 (min: 759) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
811 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Realtek RTL8852BE
iperf3 receive AXE11000
927 (min: 864) MBit/s ∼55%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12
1045 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
1445 (min: 1383) MBit/s ∼100%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050Tooltip
Asus TUF A15 FA507; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)
Asus TUF A15 FA507; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)

网络摄像头

尽管TUF Gaming A15的摄像头有一个凸起,但它只能达到720p,即使在良好的照明条件下也很难拍出像样的照片。它的锐利度极低,颜色也描绘得不是很准确。

ColorChecker
16.8 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF A15 FA507: 17.85 ∆E min: 10.63 - max: 26.82 ∆E

维护

底部的机箱盖与设备的其他部分连接得很紧--即使在松开螺丝之后。拆卸机箱的这一部分被证明是有点麻烦的。一旦你这样做了,你就可以接触到两个内存插槽、电池、风扇和M.2 2280 SSD。

内部建设
内部建设
M.2 2280 SSD
M.2 2280 SSD
2个SO-DIMM
2个SO-DIMM

输入设备 - 带有数字键盘的大键盘

键盘有一个专门的数字键盘,在上面打字很舒服。然而,问题在于键盘上的标签。除了WASD键是白色的外,其他所有的键都有透明的标签。因此,即使在良好的照明条件下,启动背光灯通常也会更舒适。有三个照明级别,你也可以选择自己的颜色--在一个区域内。它的布局很好,但你必须习惯于单行的回车键。在常规键盘的上方,还有四个特殊的按键:三个是用来控制音量的,一个可以个人分配。必须说,对于一台游戏笔记本来说,方向键特别小。

触摸板工作得很好--普通的手指运动可以顺利输入,其表面有很好的感觉。它的点击噪音也很好,很安静。总的来说,性能稳定,当然,大多数用户会转向使用外部鼠标或控制器,反正。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

显示屏 - 144-Hz的IPS面板

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
可见背光灯出血
可见背光灯出血

这台笔记本电脑有一个相对简单的哑光IPS面板,分辨率为全高清(1,920 x 1,080像素),格式为16:9。主观上,它给我们留下了相当好的印象--内容被描绘得足够清晰,浅色区域看起来没有颗粒感。它的144赫兹刷新率有助于快速移动,而且没有PWM闪烁,但总的来说,这块屏幕并没有什么值得称道的地方。

广告上说的屏幕亮度是250cd/m²,但我们测量的是270cd/m²(平均)。当然,这不是最好的,但对于室内使用和室外(如果阳光不强的话)来说,这已经足够了。反过来,它的黑值也很一般,这意味着它的对比度最多只能测到~1.700:1。该设备的反应速度对于游戏笔记本来说有点慢,当屏幕完全变暗时,你可以看到一些明显的背光渗漏。在日常使用中,这不应该是太大的烦恼。

270
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
N156HMA-GA1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 288 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 270.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 288 cd/m²
Contrast: 1694:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
Asus TUF A15 FA507
N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Gigabyte G5 KE
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
CSOT MNF601CA1-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
CMN1521, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
TL156VDXP0101, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
-37%
5%
-41%
-35%
5%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
64.9
40.7
-37%
68.8
6%
38.1
-41%
42
-35%
69.1
6%
66.4
2%
sRGB Coverage
96.5
61
-37%
99.3
3%
56.8
-41%
62.7
-35%
99.2
3%
97
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.6
42.1
-37%
69.9
5%
39.3
-41%
43.4
-35%
69.9
5%
68.5
3%
Response Times
11%
55%
-29%
-24%
59%
60%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6)
26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12)
12%
16 ?(7, 9)
47%
38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2)
-28%
35.2 ?(18, 17.2)
-16%
13 ?(6.3, 6.7)
57%
5.6 ?(3.2, 2.4)
82%
Response Time Black / White *
20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1)
18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82)
10%
7.6 ?(3, 4.6)
63%
26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6)
-29%
27.2 ?(15.6, 11.6)
-31%
8.4 ?(4.2, 4.2)
60%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
38%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-129%
-48%
-133%
-82%
-45%
-3%
Brightness middle
288
269
-7%
378
31%
261
-9%
284.3
-1%
338
17%
353.7
23%
Brightness
271
248
-8%
371
37%
258
-5%
262
-3%
329
21%
340
25%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
93
2%
92
1%
87
-4%
92
1%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.17
0.5
-194%
0.33
-94%
0.19
-12%
0.17
-0%
0.27
-59%
0.34
-100%
Contrast
1694
538
-68%
1145
-32%
1374
-19%
1672
-1%
1252
-26%
1040
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
4.54
-139%
2.84
-49%
5.57
-193%
4.52
-138%
2.88
-52%
1.74
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.3
17.28
-424%
5.51
-67%
20.6
-524%
18.67
-466%
9.35
-183%
3.63
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.9
3.34
-271%
2.75
-206%
4.63
-414%
1.55
-72%
1.22
-36%
0.5
44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
3.8
-41%
4.08
-51%
3.19
-18%
4.1
-52%
5
-85%
2.1
22%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.17 101%
2.4 92%
2.45 90%
2.3 96%
2.162 102%
2.3 96%
CCT
6535 99%
7408 88%
5841 111%
6146 106%
6529 100%
7497 87%
6257 104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-52% / -89%
4% / -22%
-68% / -98%
-47% / -64%
6% / -19%
20% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰调子
卡尔曼灰调子
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN灰度标定
CalMAN灰度标定
已校准的CalMAN饱和度
已校准的CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准

使用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2),我们对该面板进行了测量,其性能在开箱后就非常好。没有色差,其色彩描述已经非常准确,这意味着你可以直接进行图像编辑工作(至少在较小的sRGB色彩空间内)。经过我们自己的校准(你可以在上面免费下载这个配置文件),我们能够在此基础上稍作改进,但这并不是真正必要的--特别是对于游戏而言。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.7 ms rise
↘ 9.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在户外
在户外

在户外,你肯定会从屏幕的哑光中受益,但如果太亮,你还是会努力看清屏幕上的内容。屏幕亮度可以做得更亮。IPS面板的视角稳定性很好--然而,从某些角度看,屏幕有时会显得太亮(尤其是从顶部和侧面看)。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - TUF Gaming将Ryzen 7与RTX 4050结合起来。

我们的测试配置是该系列中最弱的型号--作为选择,华硕TUF Gaming A15可以安装较新的Ryzen 9 7940HS和一台GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑在最好的情况下。当然,在这种配置下,笔记本电脑的成本将大大增加。

 
 
 

测试条件

华硕为其游戏笔记本电脑使用Armoury Crate软件,其中也有不同的能量配置文件。然而,在我们的配置中,可选的Turbo模式并没有带来性能的提升,这就是为什么我们在性能模式下进行所有的测量和基准测试。此外,Advanced Optimus处于激活状态,然而,这导致在切换图形时出现轻微停顿(例如,在启动游戏时)。如果你不希望这样,你可以永久停用iGPU或使用正常的Optimus功能。

处理器 - Ryzen 7 7735HS

淘宝网AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS被用作笔记本电脑的处理器,这基本上是旧的Ryzen 7 6800HS但最大时钟提高了50MHz。Zen3+芯片有8个核心,可以同时处理16个线程。TUF Gaming A15的功率限制为80/65瓦,这使得它的多核性能相当不错,往往领先于采用Alder Lake CPU的竞争对手。然而,在单核测试中,拥有性能核心的英特尔芯片有明显的优势。不出所料,7735HS与申科XMG Core 15'sRyzen 7 6800H.总的来说,对于经济型游戏笔记本来说,该CPU是一个不错的选择。在电池供电的情况下,CPU短暂地消耗45瓦,然后回落到32瓦,这就是为什么多核性能下降了20%。更多的CPU基准测试可在 这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2326 (2309.07-2343.16)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1980 (1935.64-2695.78)
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2176 (2136.52-2272.47)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2656 (2614.89-2735.42)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
84.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
73.1 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
66.7 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
66 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
62.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
62.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
61.6 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
61.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
 
60.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)
21651 Points +57%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
17713 (16651.9min - 17712.9max) Points +29%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
15537 Points +13%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
15271 (12272min - 15271.4max) Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
14686 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
14410 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
13750 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
13155 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (11072 - 14131, n=12)
13103 Points -5%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)
1877 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
1771 Points +15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points +14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1697 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
1681 Points +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
1629 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1552 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1546 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (1288 - 1570, n=12)
1524 Points -1%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +54%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
6754 Points +26%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
6009 Points +12%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
5921 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
5640 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5582 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5354 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (4339 - 5502, n=12)
5080 Points -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
5066 Points -5%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +20%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
681 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
680 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
653 Points +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
652 Points +8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
627 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
605 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
603 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (502 - 613, n=12)
595 Points -1%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +49%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
2735 (2614.89min - 2735.42max) Points +20%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
2696 (1935.64min - 2695.78max) Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
2343 (2309.07min - 2343.16max) Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2274 (2188.66min - 2273.89max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
2272 (2136.52min - 2272.47max) Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
2253 (1876.44min - 2253.14max) Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (1795 - 2355, n=14)
2166 Points -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
2112 (1956.47min - 2112.49max) Points -7%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +11%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
253 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
250 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
249 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
247 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
247 Points -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
245 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (206 - 255, n=13)
245 Points -2%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (214 - 279, n=12)
238 Seconds * -7%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
234 Seconds * -5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
234 Seconds * -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
230 Seconds * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
223 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
223 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
216 Seconds * +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
182 Seconds * +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * +23%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS +40%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
67160 MIPS +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
64333 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
60612 MIPS
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
59034 MIPS -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (48327 - 63698, n=12)
59032 MIPS -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
54380 MIPS -10%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
50905 MIPS -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
44105 MIPS -27%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS +9%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
5826 MIPS +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5786 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5779 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (4779 - 5849, n=12)
5676 MIPS -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
5537 MIPS -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
5451 MIPS -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
5383 MIPS -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
5381 MIPS -7%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points +59%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
12358 Points +32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
11198 Points +20%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
10348 Points +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
10260 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
10254 Points +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (7368 - 10258, n=12)
9394 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9346 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
7962 Points -15%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points +25%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
1751 Points +16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1667 Points +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
1647 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
1624 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1565 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (1327 - 1615, n=12)
1541 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1507 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +34%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.5 fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
18.2 fps +5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
17.4 fps 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.4 fps
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
16.6 fps -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (12.7 - 17.9, n=12)
16.3 fps -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
15.7 fps -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
15.5 fps -11%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
79.5 s * -57%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
57.7 s * -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (44.3 - 63.9, n=12)
53.9 s * -7%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
50.6 s *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
49.9 s * +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
49.3 s * +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
48.9 s * +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
47 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
0.508 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (0.4822 - 0.585, n=12)
0.504 sec * -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.4964 sec *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
0.4904 sec * +1%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
0.4865 sec * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
0.4783 sec * +4%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4715 sec * +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4655 sec * +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2274 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
141.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5354 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
603 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1546 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13750 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
99 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80.8 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77.5 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
 
76.7 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
70.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66.7 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
64.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
63.4 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
60.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)
21640 KRay/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
16897 KRay/s +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
16315 KRay/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
15620 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (12718 - 17161, n=13)
15187 KRay/s -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
13947 KRay/s -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12692 KRay/s -22%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
12542 KRay/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9486 KRay/s -42%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)
106090 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
105922 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
102221 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (81722 - 105483, n=13)
95077 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
76434 Points -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
68178 Points -33%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
65919 Points -36%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62814 Points -39%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41434 Points -59%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)
4852 MB/s +42%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3525 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3421 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3337 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3288 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3244 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (2818 - 3494, n=13)
3226 MB/s -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3212 MB/s -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2876 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)
116237 Points +12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
103991 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
102409 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (90101 - 108729, n=13)
100876 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99267 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
90468 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
87225 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
80703 Points -22%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80337 Points -23%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)
13175 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
13066 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
12579 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (11441 - 13097, n=13)
12501 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9852 Points -22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8694 Points -31%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8415 Points -33%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7388 Points -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7385 Points -41%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
58314 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
55524 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)
53471 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (44756 - 58232, n=13)
52240 Points -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
37738 Points -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
33085 Points -40%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
31844 Points -43%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31516 Points -43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26379 Points -52%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
110905 MB/s +67%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
110639 MB/s +67%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)
109176 MB/s +64%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (49927 - 137629, n=13)
84134 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
67816 MB/s +2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66845 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66712 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66447 MB/s
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
60410 MB/s -9%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)
1349 MB/s +107%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1164 MB/s +79%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
924 MB/s +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
919 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
898 MB/s +38%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
879 MB/s +35%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
808 MB/s +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (651 - 906, n=13)
804 MB/s +24%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
651 MB/s
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)
11654 KRay/s +36%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8980 KRay/s +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8556 KRay/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8448 KRay/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (1459 - 9094, n=13)
7511 KRay/s -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7034 KRay/s -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6989 KRay/s -18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6790 KRay/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
5486 KRay/s -36%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)
39919 MPixel/s +41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
37023 MPixel/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
33509 MPixel/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
30145 MPixel/s +6%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29085 MPixel/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
28318 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (19153 - 30542, n=13)
27840 MPixel/s -2%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19764 MPixel/s -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
13686 MPixel/s -52%

系统性能

TUF Gaming A15在合成系统基准测试中表现良好,在PCMark 10测试中能够将自己置于中上层。总的来说,竞争者之间的差距不大,主观上,在性能方面,他们都给我们留下了良好的印象。除了前面提到的在GPU切换过程中的轻微停顿(这是正常的),系统在测试中始终运行平稳。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7426 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7250 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
7210 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
7210 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
7201 Points 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6918 Points -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6892 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6755 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
11150 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10841 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10573 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
10573 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10499 Points -1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10401 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10180 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
10047 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9744 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9554 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9522 Points +2%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
9475 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
9313 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
9313 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9070 Points -3%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9053 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
11672 Points +13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10333 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
10333 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9985 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
9593 Points -7%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9542 Points -8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8957 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8744 Points -15%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)
1899 Points +23%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1752 Points +13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1718 Points +11%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1656 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1583 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1550 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
1550 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)
1801 Points +19%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1720 Points +13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1653 Points +9%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1595 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1523 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1517 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
1517 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)
2083 Points +22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1840 Points +8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1826 Points +7%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1778 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1767 Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1709 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
1709 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1771 Points +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)
1699 Points +38%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1570 Points +28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1383 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1282 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1231 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
1231 Points 0%
PCMark 10 Score
7210 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)
64907 MB/s +34%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56560 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
53661 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
51033 MB/s +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
48432 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (30324 - 52012, n=13)
48412 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44445 MB/s -8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
42004 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
23850 MB/s -51%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)
68658 MB/s +37%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65535 MB/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
59205 MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
51619 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
49994 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (33938 - 51856, n=13)
48582 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
47514 MB/s -5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46966 MB/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
24879 MB/s -50%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)
66727 MB/s +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
58758 MB/s +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57505 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
55220 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
54997 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (33175 - 55284, n=13)
52789 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46901 MB/s -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44756 MB/s -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
23543 MB/s -57%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96.1 ns * -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
94.9 ns * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns * -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (78.2 - 109.7, n=13)
88.2 ns * -7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86 ns * -5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
82.2 ns *
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
78.7 ns * +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载),测试设备在目前的BIOS版本下显示出一些限制,因此不适合无限制的实时音频软件。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7213.9 μs *
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3384 μs *
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1554.9 μs *
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
1418.9 μs *
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1002.5 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
719 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

安装的固态硬盘是美光公司的PCIe 4.0硬盘(2400)。这块M.2 2280硬盘的存储容量为512GB,第一次启动后有420GB可用。QLC-SSD的最大传输速率为4200MB/s,这也与我们基准中的速率相符。总的来说,它的性能很好,即使在较长的负载下也很稳定。更多的SSD基准测试被列在 这里.

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4315 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1821 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 373 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 406 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 379 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1082 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
87.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
74.8 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
74.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
71.1 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
70.5 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
62.6 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
47.4 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
42.5 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
 
39.1 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3702 (3637.58min - 3701.54max) MB/s +110%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)
3487 MB/s +98%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3429 (3399.4min - 3429.12max) MB/s +95%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2390 (2088.15min - 2390.38max) MB/s +36%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2383 (2361.29min - 2382.94max) MB/s +35%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2271.71min - 2290.75max) MB/s +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
2168 (2101.77min - 2167.68max) MB/s +23%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1748 - 2253, n=5)
1891 MB/s +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1759 (1754.48min - 1759.3max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1759 (1754.48min - 1759.3max) MB/s 0%
seq write
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)
3797 MB/s +144%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3148 (3102.4min - 3147.82max) MB/s +103%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3113 (2869.67min - 3113.43max) MB/s +100%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2903 (2823.62min - 2902.74max) MB/s +87%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2894 (2651.7min - 2893.78max) MB/s +86%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2230 (2171.45min - 2229.69max) MB/s +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
1607 (1584.61min - 1607.26max) MB/s +3%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1519 - 1671, n=5)
1585 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1554 (1534.35min - 1553.61max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1554 (1534.35min - 1553.61max) MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6850 (5680.31min - 6850.35max) MB/s +76%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6719 (5699.43min - 6719.47max) MB/s +73%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)
6328 MB/s +63%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
4725 (4035.45min - 4724.88max) MB/s +22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4556 (3742.64min - 4556.27max) MB/s +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3886 (3200.77min - 3885.81max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3886 (3200.77min - 3885.81max) MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (3234 - 4294, n=5)
3728 MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3554 (3284.35min - 3554.02max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
2660 (2328.47min - 2659.74max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4927 (4921.4min - 4927.47max) MB/s +200%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4857 (4829.1min - 4856.73max) MB/s +196%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)
4823 MB/s +194%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3411 (3334.51min - 3410.81max) MB/s +108%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2869 (2667.88min - 2869.19max) MB/s +75%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2255 (2245.25min - 2255.17max) MB/s +38%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1610 - 1773, n=5)
1682 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
1671 (1644.73min - 1670.81max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1640 (1630.54min - 1639.84max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1640 (1630.54min - 1639.84max) MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
80.9 (75.58min - 80.91max) MB/s +148%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
72.3 (71.34min - 72.26max) MB/s +122%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
69.4 (68.09min - 69.4max) MB/s +113%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s +102%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
62.6 (62.25min - 62.63max) MB/s +92%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
61.1 (60.21min - 61.13max) MB/s +87%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
32.6 (32.27min - 32.56max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
32.6 (32.27min - 32.56max) MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (29.9 - 32.8, n=5)
31.9 MB/s -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
31.8 (31.24min - 31.76max) MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
369 (333.31min - 369.47max) MB/s +185%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
267 (258.43min - 266.75max) MB/s +106%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)
222 MB/s +71%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
211 (210.13min - 210.73max) MB/s +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
194.3 (188.32min - 194.33max) MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
132.2 (127.58min - 132.23max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
129.5 (125.88min - 129.52max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
129.5 (125.88min - 129.52max) MB/s 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
129.2 (127.83min - 129.15max) MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (106.4 - 132, n=5)
123.7 MB/s -4%
4k q32 t16 read
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)
2555 MB/s +224%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2217 (2210.73min - 2217.07max) MB/s +181%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1678 (1211.7min - 1678.15max) MB/s +113%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1323 (1320.64min - 1322.54max) MB/s +68%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (766 - 1705, n=5)
1017 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1010 (971.83min - 1010.09max) MB/s +28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
903 (865.18min - 903.16max) MB/s +14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
789 (769.77min - 789.25max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
789 (769.77min - 789.25max) MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
474 (463.36min - 474.33max) MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2314 (2299.73min - 2313.93max) MB/s +637%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2234 (2227.81min - 2234.36max) MB/s +611%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s +569%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1509 MB/s +381%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
609 (579.43min - 608.79max) MB/s +94%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (313 - 1585, n=5)
595 MB/s +89%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
372 (363.89min - 371.6max) MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
345 (331.77min - 344.95max) MB/s +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
314 (293.25min - 314.3max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
314 (293.25min - 314.3max) MB/s 0%
AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)
6737 Points +103%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6117 Points +85%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
5541 Points +67%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5285 Points +59%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5168 Points +56%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4020 Points +21%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (2845 - 4261, n=4)
3370 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3315 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
2702 Points -18%
Score Read
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)
2441 Points +119%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2291 Points +105%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2128 Points +91%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1726 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1621 Points +45%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1322 Points +18%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1031 - 1830, n=4)
1305 Points +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1116 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
760 Points -32%
Score Write
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3361 Points +94%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)
3113 Points +79%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2814 Points +62%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2660 Points +53%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2388 Points +38%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1735 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
1584 Points -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1257 - 1735, n=4)
1491 Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1456 Points -16%
Seq Read
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)
4944 MB/s +43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4874 MB/s +41%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4111.85 MB/s +19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3792 MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
3697.92 MB/s +7%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3466 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (2798 - 3691, n=4)
3189 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3013 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
2432.02 MB/s -30%
Seq Write
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)
3720 MB/s +187%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2772 MB/s +114%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2768 MB/s +114%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2711 MB/s +109%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2232.79 MB/s +72%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2106.21 MB/s +63%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1156 - 1633, n=4)
1329 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1295 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
1229.14 MB/s -5%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
82.5 MB/s +171%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
75.66 MB/s +149%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
71.91 MB/s +137%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
66.9 MB/s +120%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s +114%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
63 MB/s +107%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
51.2 MB/s +68%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (30 - 42.8, n=4)
35.7 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
30.4 MB/s
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
312.09 MB/s +127%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
242.19 MB/s +76%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
225 MB/s +64%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +53%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
184.8 MB/s +34%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
169.96 MB/s +24%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
137.5 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
136 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (99.8 - 137.5, n=4)
121.6 MB/s -12%
4K-64 Read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1923 MB/s +160%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s +154%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1675.54 MB/s +127%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1296 MB/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1070 MB/s +45%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (721 - 1430, n=4)
953 MB/s +29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
838.49 MB/s +13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
739 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
441.63 MB/s -40%
4K-64 Write
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2967.73 MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s +73%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2407 MB/s +64%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2198 MB/s +50%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1865.08 MB/s +27%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1468 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1003 - 1468, n=4)
1258 MB/s -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
1218.61 MB/s -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
954 MB/s -35%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (0.039 - 0.15, n=4)
0.095 ms * -144%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
0.073 ms * -87%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
0.066 ms * -69%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)
0.05509 ms * -41%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.046 ms * -18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
0.039 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.03 ms * +23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.03 ms * +23%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.029 ms * +26%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (0.116 - 0.414, n=4)
0.1968 ms * -42%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
0.139 ms *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.108 ms * +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.081 ms * +42%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.074 ms * +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)
0.04843 ms * +65%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
0.033 ms * +76%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.029 ms * +79%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
0.013 ms * +91%

* ... smaller is better

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0205410615820102512301435164018452050225524602665287030753280348536903895Tooltip
Asus TUF A15 FA507: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)
Asus TUF A15 FA507: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)

显卡 -GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑

GPU-Z Radeon 680M
GPU-Z Radeon 680M
GPU-ZGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑
GPU-ZGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑

在日常使用中,图形计算是由集成的AMD Radeon 680M- 对于较大的工作量,它会自动切换到专用的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑.后者有6GB内存,根据驱动程序,这是140瓦的版本。然而,这一规格有点误导,因为无论如何,新的GPU在游戏时最多消耗~95瓦。因此,它是RTX 4050笔记本电脑的最快版本。这也反映在基准测试中,TUF Gaming A15的平均表现比我们数据库中该GPU的平均值快10%左右。

这意味着RTX 4050笔记本电脑也非常接近于旧的 RTX 3060,在对比设备中,它的功耗也明显更高(在115瓦和140瓦TGP之间)。总的来说,它的性能非常好,即使在永久性负载下也没有性能下降--Time Spy 压力测试的运行没有任何问题,通过率为99.3%。在电池模式下,GPU的功耗被限制在50瓦左右,这就是为什么图形性能下降了约30%。更多GPU基准测试列在我们的技术部分。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM -4!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
74.6 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
70 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK -3!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
69.9 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE -3!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
68.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
65.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
65.2 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 -3!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
46.2 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
42.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +37%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
31690 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
30959 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
30772 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
29569 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
29568 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (13339 - 32642, n=38)
28641 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
20869 Points -34%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
19416 Points -39%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +36%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
23443 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
22915 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
22899 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
22625 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
22406 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (13591 - 24007, n=36)
21155 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
15611 Points -32%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
14628 Points -36%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +50%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9174 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
8764 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
8692 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
8686 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
8500 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (5107 - 9040, n=36)
7812 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
5946 Points -32%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
5481 Points -37%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)
125975 Points +44%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
105772 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
102470 Points +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
102369 Points +17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
87670 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
87554 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (63538 - 90075, n=35)
82571 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
71459 Points -18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
68271 Points -22%
Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)
115603 Points +42%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
81622 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (66574 - 84452, n=12)
76353 Points -6%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)
701 mpaths +40%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
501 mpaths
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
480 mpaths -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (333 - 565, n=32)
471 mpaths -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
396 mpaths -21%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
395 mpaths -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
216 mpaths -57%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)
2181 mpaths +49%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1465 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (618 - 1588, n=22)
1388 mpaths -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1227 mpaths -16%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
679 mpaths -54%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)
1568 mpaths +46%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1075 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (735 - 1174, n=22)
1033 mpaths -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
917 mpaths -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
552 mpaths -49%
3DMark 11 Performance
26692 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20183 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8902 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
393 Seconds * -14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
345 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
345 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (345 - 345, n=2)
345 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (63 - 399, n=10, last 2 years)
247 Seconds * +28%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
48 Seconds * -78%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
48 Seconds * -78%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
30 Seconds * -11%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
30 Seconds * -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (25 - 37, n=37)
28.8 Seconds * -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
27 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
27 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
27 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)
21 Seconds * +22%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
83 Seconds * -66%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
83 Seconds * -66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (47 - 175, n=37)
56.2 Seconds * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
53 Seconds * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
53 Seconds * -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
52 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
50 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
50 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.7 Seconds * +27%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
441 Seconds * -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
423 Seconds * -13%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
416 Seconds * -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (243 - 907, n=37)
395 Seconds * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
385 Seconds * -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
376 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
376 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
361 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)
297 Seconds * +21%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

我们的TUF Gaming A15的基本变体的游戏性能非常好--即使在以最大细节设置玩《霍格沃茨传奇》或《赛博朋克2077》等现代游戏时,对原生1080p分辨率来说也是绰绰有余。然而,如果你想使用光线追踪,你必须使用DLSS升频。例如,《赛博朋克2077》在1080p下使用光线追踪在Ultra下只能运行24FPS,而使用DLSS则可以运行74FPS。然而,在其他游戏中的差异可能更小。基本上,所有现代游戏都能运行,6GB的VRAM目前完全可以满足1080p的要求。该 Witcher 3测试还表明,即使在较长的时间内,游戏性能也保持稳定。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.2 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.4 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
78 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
73.2 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
70.3 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
61 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.8 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +54%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.5 (87min) fps +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.6 (77min, 77.42P1) fps +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83 fps +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
82.2 (79min, 80P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
81.5 (69min, 78P1) fps -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.5 (49min) fps -29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54.7 (51min) fps -33%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps +35%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
103 (7.98min, 71.4P1) fps +23%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97.9 (4.48min, 62.5P1) fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97.3 (8.65min, 62.5P1) fps +17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
92.2 (4.55min, 55.6P1) fps +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83.5 (2.82min, 58.8P1) fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73.5 (23.5min, 47.6P1) fps -12%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73.1 (6.87min, 47.6P1) fps -12%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps +46%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.9 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.9 fps +13%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
90.3 fps +11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
82.8 fps +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.5 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.8 fps -28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54.7 fps -33%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps +54%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
160 (75.9min, 121P1) fps +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
153.3 (32.3min, 117.2P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
152.7 (65.8min, 117.2P1) fps +4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
148.7 (20.2min, 114.3P1) fps +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
147 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
101.3 (71.9min, 78.3P1) fps -31%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
97.4 (34.3min, 73.6P1) fps -34%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps +29%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
148 (129.6min) fps +28%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
142.5 (121.3min) fps +23%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
137.5 (121.2min) fps +19%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
123.8 (108.4min) fps +7%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
115.8 (102.7min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
112.3 (97.8min) fps -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
107.8 (97.3min) fps -7%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)
107.2 fps +38%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
107 fps +38%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97 fps +25%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92.9 fps +19%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86.7 fps +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
81.1 fps +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74.2 fps -5%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +54%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.5 (87min) fps +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.6 (77min, 77.42P1) fps +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83 fps +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
82.2 (79min, 80P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
81.5 (69min, 78P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (18.5 - 94.7, n=39)
75.4 fps -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.5 (49min) fps -29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54.7 (51min) fps -33%
F1 22
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (17.1 - 322, n=90, last 2 years)
206 fps +28%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
161.2 (124min, 72P1) fps
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
153.3 (137min, 102P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (94.4 - 174.7, n=21)
145.6 fps -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92 (76min) fps -43%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (13 - 144.7, n=97, last 2 years)
84.5 fps +50%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56.4 (44min, 42P1) fps
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
55.9 (48min, 46P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (10.9 - 56.4, n=23)
47.6 fps -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
32 (26min) fps -43%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
119 fps +20%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
118 (90min) fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
114 (86min) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
107 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (50 - 127, n=23)
102.5 fps +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
99 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (12.2 - 205, n=60, last 2 years)
98 fps +38%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.5 (12.2min) fps +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (48 - 91.3, n=14)
67.8 fps -5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46.9 (5.1min) fps -34%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (16.7 - 159.7, n=71, last 2 years)
92.4 fps +40%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68 (30.6min) fps +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (44.4 - 79.4, n=14)
62.1 fps -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
36.8 (5.1min) fps -44%
Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
89 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.8 - 186.5, n=26, last 2 years)
88.1 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (44.8 - 93.6, n=8)
66.3 fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming
  (10.3 - 166.1, n=27, last 2 years)
73.7 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (39 - 77.3, n=8)
53.3 fps +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
49 fps
CPU/GPU值Witcher 3 (Ultra设置)
CPU/GPU值Witcher 3 (Ultra设置)

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø82.2 (79-84)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 168.6 153.1 83.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 171 82.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 137.4 127.2 115.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 178.9 115.5 81.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 103.5 97 77.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 111 105 99
Strange Brigade (2018) 211 171 147
F1 2021 (2021) 283 260 209 110.3
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 103 82 71 66
F1 22 (2022) 192.7 191.4 161.2 56.4
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 122 109 89 49

排放--带有酷炫键盘的游戏笔记本

噪声排放

对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说,我们的测试设备是比较安静的。在简单的任务中,散热器经常是完全无声的,甚至在负载下,我们也感到非常惊讶:在压力测试中,风扇的最大噪音水平为43 dB(A)。在游戏时,我们测得的噪音在40-43 dB(A)之间,这意味着TUF Gaming A15仍然比其竞争对手更安静。我们假设更强的配置会有稍大的风扇。我们没有注意到任何其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A)
Load
29.6 / 43 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2023.723.923.125.123.62524.522.523.128.929.2312523.32125.624.64024.72423.523.420.55023.120.221.122.2256325.826.519.318.917.98022.222.519.618.11810022.12219.817.318.812523.822.520.117.221.516022.421.223.615.519.420022.924.219.214.320.725024.127.118.51421.231525.126.418.811.821.740027.329.320.812.123.85002828.723.111.123.163029.430.920.310.824.580029.132.418.810.424.5100027.530.816.910.121.9125030.433.818.510.124.9160030.433.819.110.124.9200029.333.518.110.722.9250027.931.615.910.821.131502730.117.211.320.1400025.428.414.911.520500028.130.913.411.717.363002227.613.61213.6800019.321.413.212.112.81000017.51713.311.912.41250016.814.712.711.712.11600017.512.712.211.211.7SPL39.74329.623.333.9N3.24.11.20.51.8median 25.4median 28.4median 18.5median 11.7median 21.1Delta3.14.83.11.23.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus TUF A15 FA507
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Noise
-33%
-13%
-10%
-10%
-25%
-14%
off / environment *
23.3
19.52
16%
23
1%
24
-3%
24.8
-6%
25
-7%
23.2
-0%
Idle Minimum *
23.3
31.05
-33%
23
1%
24
-3%
26.2
-12%
29
-24%
23.6
-1%
Idle Average *
23.3
31.05
-33%
23
1%
24
-3%
29.2
-25%
30
-29%
23.6
-1%
Idle Maximum *
23.3
31.05
-33%
23
1%
24
-3%
29.4
-26%
32
-37%
25.4
-9%
Load Average *
29.6
55.66
-88%
42.41
-43%
37.71
-27%
29.9
-1%
42
-42%
38
-28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43
55.7
-30%
54.71
-27%
45.75
-6%
41.1
4%
46
-7%
54.1
-26%
Load Maximum *
43
55.51
-29%
55.05
-28%
54.55
-27%
45.5
-6%
54
-26%
57.2
-33%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常工作中没有温度问题,即使在负载下,华硕笔记本电脑的表面温度也得到了很好的控制。基本单元的上部中心区域变得非常热,几乎达到50℃,但这个热点在键盘上方,特别是WASD键区域保持非常凉爽,这在游戏时很重要。在底部,我们测量了后部区域的最高温度为44℃,你甚至可以将笔记本放在大腿上而没有任何问题。

正如预期的那样,在压力测试中,dGPU受到了青睐。在最初的15分钟内仍有轻微的波动,然后处理器和显卡分别稳定在35瓦和80瓦的水平。

CPU/GPU值压力测试
CPU/GPU值压力测试
Max. Load
 44.8 °C48.9 °C43 °C 
 35.8 °C42.6 °C39.2 °C 
 27.1 °C30.6 °C24.8 °C 
Maximum: 48.9 °C
Average: 37.4 °C
44.6 °C41.8 °C43.5 °C
34.2 °C31.3 °C35 °C
23.1 °C25.1 °C24 °C
Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Heat
-25%
-9%
-18%
20%
2%
-21%
Maximum Upper Side *
48.9
52.6
-8%
48
2%
47
4%
37.2
24%
47
4%
44.4
9%
Maximum Bottom *
44.6
62.4
-40%
51
-14%
48
-8%
35.4
21%
52
-17%
48.8
-9%
Idle Upper Side *
27.1
33.6
-24%
28
-3%
35
-29%
22.4
17%
25
8%
37.8
-39%
Idle Bottom *
27.5
34.8
-27%
33
-20%
38
-38%
22.6
18%
24
13%
39.6
-44%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

TUF Gaming A15当然不能夸耀惊人的声音,两个立体声扬声器相当平均--但这往往是廉价游戏笔记本电脑的情况。音乐和电影的收听和观看其实并不有趣--反正我们建议在游戏时使用耳机,因为否则风扇会很烦人。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.128.72528.930.23125.629.64023.429.55022.231.16318.934.18018.136.210017.341.712517.245.616015.544.820014.348.22501449.331511.853.140012.157.150011.161.263010.869.280010.472.7100010.168.4125010.169.2160010.171.7200010.770.2250010.860.8315011.358.8400011.563.4500011.764.763001262.7800012.164.81000011.960.51250011.754.71600011.248.6SPL23.379.3N0.543.8median 11.7median 60.8Delta1.29.736.638.536.635.140.135.13841.73829.130.529.126.828.326.829.830.429.832.724.632.733.324.433.337.420.737.443.817.643.847.52447.550.920.650.953.115.953.158.312.858.364.311.364.371.710.771.776.19.776.174.29.174.269.59.269.567.79.367.769.99.669.964.69.864.66910.36966.910.566.966.210.966.263.51163.564.211.364.262.111.162.15911.35955.71155.781.323.681.349.30.549.3median 64.2median 11median 64.283.38hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF A15 FA507SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.28 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--由于有大电池,运行时间长

消耗功率

240瓦的电源
240瓦的电源

在我们的消耗测量中,评测样本仍然非常节俭,即使在游戏时,A15仍然比RTX-3060笔记本电脑高效得多,后者也没有提供更多的功率。我们在压力测试中确定的最大功率为185瓦,然后迅速稳定在155瓦左右。鉴于这些比率,所包含的240瓦的电源对于基本变体来说几乎是超大的,而目前更紧凑的200瓦模块的Zenbook Pro 14将完全足够。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8 / 12.1 / 12.5 Watt
Load midlight 74.9 / 185 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus TUF A15 FA507
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-19%
-31%
2%
-11%
-7%
-30%
-22%
-63%
Idle Minimum *
8
7.66
4%
11.8
-48%
8.5
-6%
5.1
36%
8
-0%
6.3
21%
9.84 ?(2 - 21.1, n=30)
-23%
Idle Average *
12.1
10.3
15%
14.7
-21%
10.2
16%
15.1
-25%
10
17%
9.8
19%
14.8 ?(5 - 32, n=30)
-22%
Idle Maximum *
12.5
16.05
-28%
15
-20%
11.3
10%
18.9
-51%
16
-28%
26.5
-112%
19.1 ?(7.9 - 33.9, n=30)
-53%
Load Average *
74.9
115.8
-55%
100
-34%
84
-12%
114.5
-53%
99
-32%
103.8
-39%
87.9 ?(52.4 - 151, n=30)
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
136.6
168.7
-23%
184
-35%
128
6%
113.9
17%
144.6
-6%
189
-38%
Load Maximum *
185
234.6
-27%
237
-28%
189
-2%
165.8
10%
168
9%
241.9
-31%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Asus TUF A15 FA507; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø136.6 (130.6-143)
Asus TUF A15 FA507; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø156.7 (141.4-185.8)
Asus TUF A15 FA507; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.48 (5.34-11.4)

power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Asus TUF A15 FA507; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø8.13 (5.12-10.8)
Asus TUF A15 FA507; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø104.5 (84.7-111.6)
Asus TUF A15 FA507; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34.5 (32.8-59.9)
Asus TUF A15 FA507; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93.8 (91-95.8)
Asus TUF A15 FA507; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø131.7 (128.4-146.1)
Asus TUF A15 FA507; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø135.2 (129.6-143.3)

运行时间

这台笔记本电脑的90Wh电池导致了非常好的电池运行时间。除了几分钟之外,在我们的测试中,无论显示器是在60赫兹还是144赫兹模式下,都没有什么区别。在150cd/m²的WLAN测试中(相当于最大亮度的73%),我们注意到刚刚超过11.5小时,在全亮度下仍然超过9.5小时。在150cd/m²的视频测试中,我们测得超过12.5小时。当设备被打开时,一个完整的充电过程需要106分钟。充电曲线在70%时才趋于平缓,这是在~44分钟后的情况。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 114)
11h 41min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 114)
9h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 27min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 59min
Asus TUF A15 FA507
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22)
R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 60 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-43%
-13%
-26%
-36%
-50%
-24%
-15%
H.264
747
130
-83%
264
-65%
WiFi v1.3
701
342
-51%
465
-34%
260
-63%
127
-82%
352
-50%
285
-59%
Load
59
62
5%
64
8%
89
51%
65
10%
66
12%
Witcher 3 ultra
79
Reader / Idle
155
947

Pros

+ 在1080p下有很好的游戏性能
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 2个SO-DIMM和USB 4
+ 哑光144-Hz IPS显示屏,色彩还原准确
+ 超长的运行时间
+ 有效的冷却

Cons

- 平庸的网络摄像头
- 扬声器较弱
- 基本版没有操作系统

结论 - 一个适合1080p游戏的良好游戏笔记本电脑

华硕TUF Gaming A15评测。测试设备由德国华硕提供。
华硕TUF Gaming A15评测。测试设备由德国华硕提供。

随着TUF Gaming A15的发布,Asos将注意力集中在本质上:游戏性能。我们的基本版本,可以有大约1169美元,已经提供了足够的力量,以1080p的原生分辨率和最大的细节,顺利地玩目前的游戏 - 由于其新的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑.如果你利用升频,那么你甚至可以设法运行光线追踪。它的Zen3+处理器是一个老朋友,但即使如此,它仍然能够提供坚实的性能。内存和固态硬盘可以扩展--虽然,16GB和512GB应该可以开始使用。

笔记本电脑的外壳质量很好;它没有任何形式的花哨照明(这不一定是件坏事)。键盘上的标签对比度有点低,你经常要依靠背光才能清楚地看到它们。但是,当你在游戏时,键盘能够保持良好的温度,而且风扇不会太响。

新的华硕TUF游戏A15的基础版本是一个很好的游戏笔记本电脑,其RTX 4050笔记本电脑为1080p显示屏提供足够的性能。

该屏幕做了它应该做的事。它的16:9哑光IPS面板的刷新率为144赫兹,色彩准确度良好,但其反应时间和亮度可以做得更好一些。我们测量了后者的亮度为300cd/m²。它的连接选项甚至包括USB 4.0,你可以连接一个G-Sync显示器。唯一的问题是,几乎所有笔记本电脑的端口都在设备的左前方和中间。

这台笔记本电脑并没有真正标出任何适当的弱点,但你必须记住,基本版本没有安装操作系统。在许多方面,该设备提供标准功能(WLAN、扬声器、网络摄像头)--但在所有核心领域,其性能令人满意。它大约1169美元的价格也相当有竞争力。

价格和可用性

我们测试的设备在亚马逊上可以找到,价格约为1169美元。

Asus TUF A15 FA507 - 06/13/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
79 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
58 / 80 → 73%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
89 / 95 → 93%
Display
87%
Games Performance
97%
Application Performance
93%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 92%
Noise
94 / 90 → 100%
Audio
78%
Camera
33 / 85 → 39%
Average
79%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕TUF游戏A15笔记本评测--拥有RTX4050和144Hz屏幕的预算玩家
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-06-15 (Update: 2023-06-15)