Notebookcheck Logo

华硕Zenbook Pro 14 OLED笔记本电脑回顾:配备120赫兹OLED显示屏的MacBook Pro竞争对手

面向内容创作者和游戏玩家的RTX 4070。

华硕重新推出14.5英寸的Zenbook Pro,并为这款快速多媒体笔记本配备了猛禽湖酷睿i9-13900H和新的GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU。具有2.8K分辨率的120赫兹OLED面板也是新的,但对电池寿命有负面影响。
Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

通过其新的Zenbook Pro 14,华硕为内容创作者提供了一个强大的多媒体笔记本,从而使其与Apple MacBook Pro 14直接竞争。除了目前英特尔的猛禽湖处理器,华硕还安装了Nvidia的新RTX GPU,据此我们的测试设备甚至拥有GeForce RTX 4070 LaptopGPU。一个特殊的功能是屏幕,这是一个2.8K的OLED触摸屏,120赫兹。

然而,所有这些硬件都是有代价的--我们的测试设备配备了一个酷睿i9 13900H,RTX 4070,32GB内存和2TB固态硬盘,价格高达3500欧元(约合3750美元),因此价格直接与 MacBook Pro 14(14英寸设备具有这样的性能值是罕见的,这就是为什么我们也列出一些15英寸机型作为比较设备。

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI (ZenBook Pro 14 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2310 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 90 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 531.61, Optimus, MUX
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, 16 GB onboard + 16 GB SO-DIMM, max. 48 GB
Display
14.50 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 234 PPI, capacitive, SDC4190, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, 2048 GB 
, 1833 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS
Connections
2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 321.8 x 223.3
Battery
76 Wh, 4920 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200W PSU, Stylus, Sleeve, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.678 kg, Power Supply: 556 g
Price
3499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.7 kg17.9 mm14.50"2880x1800
87 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg21 mm14.50"2880x1800
93.9 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964
90 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1.7 kg20.5 mm14.00"2560x1600
90.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160
89.9 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440

外壳--Zenbook采用坚固的金属底盘

从视觉上看,新的Zenbook Pro 14看起来相当克制,只有显示屏盖上有一个小小的ProArt标志。华硕在其他方面没有添加任何其他视觉元素。表面很光滑,很快就会出现指纹污点,需要定期擦拭这些污点。这款笔记本在深色的科技黑中显得非常优雅,但掌托上的制造商贴纸却让人非常讨厌。右侧写有笔记本功能的大贴纸可以轻易撕掉,但左侧的四张小贴纸却不能。当你为它支付了3500欧元(约3750美元)时,谁想在他们的设备上贴上亚马逊Alexa的贴纸呢?

华硕使用了金属底盘,底座和显示盖都非常稳定,抗扭转。底座单元看起来也相当苗条,这是由锥形的侧面实现的。这与以下产品形成鲜明对比Apple MacBook Pro 14形成鲜明对比,例如,它的基本单元显得非常笨重,尽管它实际上比Zenbook更薄。这绝对不是一个非常薄的笔记本,但鉴于其强大的组件,这并不是一个批评点。

两个显示器铰链调整得很好,但不能完全防止在改变打开角度时出现某种摇晃。最大的打开角度是~135度。16:10面板的屏幕边缘非常窄,特别是在侧面,整体屏占比达到了85%。

在直接比较中,尤其是MacBook Pro 14在各方面都更紧凑一些,但在重量上没有大的差别。由于高性能的硬件,在我们的比较领域中,一些15英寸的设备自然需要多一点桌面空间。附带的200瓦电源在天平上又增加了556克的重量。

尺寸比较

355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg322 mm 225 mm 21 mm 1.8 kg321.8 mm 223.3 mm 17.9 mm 1.7 kg312 mm 227 mm 20.5 mm 1.7 kg312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 华硕安装了所有重要的端口

由于基站的后部区域被散热所占据,所以连接口分布在两边的中间。同时使用所有端口可能会导致工作场所显得非常拥挤。尽管如此,华硕提供了所有重要的端口,包括USB-A、USB-C和HDMI。后面的USB-C端口也支持Thunderbolt,如果你想在外部显示器上工作,也应该使用,因为这是在外部显示器上使用iGPU的唯一方法。另一个USB-C端口和HDMI输出总是使用专用的GPU,这消耗了不必要的电力,特别是在简单的任务中。

左边:电源、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10Gbps)、3.5毫米音频
左边:电源、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10Gbps)、3.5毫米音频
右边:SD读卡器(UHS-II),USB-C 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbps,电力传输,DisplayPort ALT模式),USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40 Gbps,电力传输,DisplayPort ALT模式)。
右边:SD读卡器(UHS-II),USB-C 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbps,电力传输,DisplayPort ALT模式),USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40 Gbps,电力传输,DisplayPort ALT模式)。

SD卡阅读器

Zenbook提供了一个成熟的SD卡读卡器,也实现了非常高的传输速率。结合我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60),我们记录的最大传输速率超过了250 MB/s,在复制图像文件时,传输速率略高于100 MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro (AV Pro V60)
181 MB/s +77%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
153.8 MB/s +51%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (Angelibrid AV Pro V60)
133 MB/s +30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)
102.2 MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
102 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
80.8 MB/s -21%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
73.2 MB/s -28%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (Angelibrid AV Pro V60)
263 MB/s +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
252.9 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro (AV Pro V60)
208 MB/s -18%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)
142.9 MB/s -43%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.1 MB/s -67%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
83.2 MB/s -67%

沟通

无线网络连接由英特尔的AX211模块处理,除了目前的Wi-Fi 6E标准外,它还支持蓝牙5.2。我们无法连接到华硕参考路由器的相应的6GHz网络,但在5GHz网络中的性能非常好,我们在WLAN方面没有问题。交付范围中还包括一个用于有线网络的USB以太网适配器。

Networking
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1462 (min: 1275) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1589 (min: 1449) MBit/s ∼93%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1567 (min: 1367) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1678 (min: 1641) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1406 (min: 1285) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1577 (min: 1301) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1777 (min: 1685) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1741 (min: 1650) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1658 (min: 1491) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1701 (min: 1660) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
894 (min: 804) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1235 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼73%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1650 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1477 (min: 1339) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1663 (min: 842) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1692 (min: 1588) MBit/s ∼97%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1462 (1275-1539)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1449-1635)

网络摄像头

华硕在屏幕上边框为网络摄像头安装了一个1080p传感器。画面质量比旧的720p型号好一点,但你不应该期待奇迹的发生。还安装了一个红外模块,可以通过Windows Hello进行面部识别。

ColorChecker
16.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI: 7.59 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 16.86 ∆E

维护

下层机箱盖是用九颗Torx螺丝(T5)固定的,可以很容易地取下。然后你可以接触到两个风扇、电池和一个用于RAM模块的SODIMM插槽。然而,WLAN模块和一个RAM模块是焊接的。

内部结构
内部结构
WLAN模块
WLAN模块
SODIMM插槽
SODIMM插槽

输入设备 - 带有拨号板的触摸板


键盘

键盘的键程为1.4毫米,总体上提供平均的输入。考虑到机箱的厚度和价格,在这里可以做得更多,特别是由于按键总体上有一点响动。例如,我们更喜欢ROG Zephyrus G14的键盘(1.7毫米行程)。在布局方面,你还必须习惯于单排回车键以及小的方向键。最后,有一个三段式的白色背光,可以通过传感器激活。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光灯
键盘背光灯

触摸板和手写笔

触摸板左上方的DialPad
触摸板左上方的DialPad

华硕为触摸板设计了一个特殊的功能,即所谓的DialPad,它被安装在左上角。这个圆环为用户提供了额外的选项,与Adobe应用程序的整合效果非常好。例如,在日常使用中,亮度和音量都可以在这里调整。这一切都运行良好,但创意应用程序中的专用特殊键和快捷键通常工作得更快。

此外,你在简单操作Pad时注意到凸起的圆环,总体来说效果不错,但咔嚓声有点大。当然,电容式触摸屏也可以作为一种选择,还包括一支主动式手写笔,这也给人留下了很好的印象,特别是在编辑图像时。

显示屏 - 120赫兹OLED触摸屏

带有可见触摸层的子像素矩阵
带有可见触摸层的子像素矩阵

华硕为Zenbook Pro 14配备了一个高分辨率的OLED触摸屏。14.5英寸面板(16:10)的分辨率为2880x1800,主观画面印象从根本上说非常好,但由于触摸屏的原因,画质略有颗粒感。由于频率高,屏幕活动非常流畅。

在技术数据中,制造商规定亮度为400 cd/m²,或HDR内容的最大亮度为550 cd/m²。然而,在我们的测量中,该面板并没有完全达到这个标准,因为我们确定普通SDR内容(即日常事物)的平均亮度几乎为360cd/m²。对比度非常高,这是由于黑色水平较低造成的。在HDR内容方面,我们记录的最高值是584 cd/m²,其中有一个小的明亮的图像部分,而大约460 cd/m²是一个几乎完全白色的图像。

Windows的HDR设置是值得批评的,因为为了使HDR内容真正显示出来,首先必须在设置中激活HDR。然而,所有的颜色配置文件随后被完全丢弃,MyAsus软件的各种颜色配置文件不再可用。Apple'在MacBook Pro 14的迷你LED面板中,HDR的实现在这里显然更有优势,而且还能达到更高的亮度值。

360
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
SDC4190 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 360 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 357.7 cd/m² Minimum: 0.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 356 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
SDC4190, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
ATNA45AF04-0 , OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
B140QAN06.S, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14"
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Display
-1%
0%
-1%
0%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
99.6
99.91
0%
99.2
0%
99.6
0%
99.8
0%
97.6
-2%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
99.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97.5
95.35
-2%
93.4
-4%
98.4
1%
94
-4%
Response Times
-107%
-629%
-435%
-89%
-71%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.67 ?(0.33, 0.34)
2 ?(1, 1)
-199%
35.2 ?(12.8, 22.4)
-5154%
17.2 ?(7.2, 10)
-2467%
1.68 ?(0.8, 0.88)
-151%
2 ?(1, 1)
-199%
Response Time Black / White *
0.9 ?(0.4, 0.5)
2 ?(1, 1)
-122%
26.4 ?(11.2, 15.2)
-2833%
9.9 ?(0.5, 9.4)
-1000%
1.94 ?(0.97, 0.97)
-116%
2 ?(1, 1)
-122%
PWM Frequency
240
240
0%
14880 ?(100, 500)
6100%
5430
2163%
239
0%
500 ?(70)
108%
Screen
-43%
-22%
-17%
-178%
-49%
Brightness middle
356
340
-4%
500
40%
535
50%
389.5
9%
383
8%
Brightness
358
340
-5%
489
37%
563
57%
392
9%
384
7%
Brightness Distribution
99
99
0%
94
-5%
91
-8%
98
-1%
99
0%
Black Level *
0.002
0.02
0.03
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
1.76
-120%
1.2
-50%
1
-25%
4.95
-519%
1.89
-136%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.6
3.2
-100%
2.6
-63%
2.8
-75%
8.65
-441%
3.76
-135%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.9
1.16
-29%
1.7
-89%
1.8
-100%
2
-122%
1.26
-40%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.43 91%
2.24 98%
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.41 91%
CCT
6590 99%
6418 101%
6791 96%
6337 103%
6265 104%
6386 102%
Contrast
170000
25000
12767
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.62
1.53
2.67
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-50% / -48%
-217% / -202%
-151% / -117%
-89% / -111%
-41% / -43%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰度(配置文件:本地)。
卡尔曼灰度(配置文件:本地)。
卡尔曼饱和度(配置文件:本地)。
卡尔曼饱和度(配置文件:本地)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:本地)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:本地)。
CalMAN灰度(配置文件:显示P3)。
CalMAN灰度(配置文件:显示P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度(配置文件:显示P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度(配置文件:显示P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:Display P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:Display P3)。

我们用专业的CalMAN软件(即X-Rite i1 Pro 2)测量了OLED面板,使用默认的Native profile以及Display P3。在Native配置文件中,颜色显得有点过饱和,这导致了更加生动的图像质量,但一些颜色超过了3的重要限制。另一方面,Display P3配置文件提供了极其准确的颜色,并允许直接进行图像/视频编辑。我们无法通过自己的校准来进一步改善显示效果,这就是为什么这里没有提供相应的配置文件供下载。我们还提供了一个sRGB配置文件。P3色彩空间已经完全覆盖。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
VS AdobeRGB
VS AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.33 ms rise
↘ 0.34 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

OLED面板的响应时间非常快,但我们在所有亮度水平上都检测到了PWM闪烁。直流调光被使用到50%的亮度水平,而频率为240赫兹的经典PWM被使用到50%以下。华硕自己建议不要低于这个亮度,而是使用MyAsus软件中的无闪烁OLED调光功能。我们在评论Zenbook S 13 OLED时详细讨论了这一点。笔记本S 13 OLED中详细讨论过,这里的功能也是一样的。

PWM: 0%的亮度
PWM: 0%的亮度
PWM:20%的亮度
PWM:20%的亮度
PWM:40%的亮度
PWM:40%的亮度
PWM:60%的亮度
PWM:60%的亮度
PWM:80%的亮度
PWM:80%的亮度
PWM:100%的亮度
PWM:100%的亮度
户外活动
户外活动

在户外,高反射的触摸屏是有问题的,因为你总是要处理反射问题,即使是在阴天。视角的稳定性总体上是非常好的。只有从某些(广角)角度,你才会注意到蓝色偏光,这是OLED面板的典型特征。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - 酷睿i9和RTX 4070笔记本GPU

Zenbook Pro 14只配备了英特尔酷睿i9-13900H,并焊接了16GB的RAM。有一个SODIMM插槽,根据型号不同,配备了16或32GB的RAM。至于显卡,你可以选择GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑RTX 4070 笔记本电脑、其中后者安装在我们的测试设备中。

 
 
 

测试条件

在MyAsus软件中,有三种不同的性能模式:WhisperStandard Performance。下表显示了这些模式的TDP/TGP值。我们在下面的基准测试和测量中使用了性能 模式,因为特别是GeForce GPU的图形性能,否则会明显降低。然而,在日常生活中,你可以很容易地使用其他两种模式中的一种,没有问题。Zenbook也有一个MUX开关,可以用来完全禁用集成GPU。然而,切换需要重新启动系统。

模式 CPU GPU 压力测试 CB R23 Multi Time Spy 图像
Whisper 45 watts 35 watts CPU: 25 watts
GPU:35瓦
13.453分 7.252分
标准 120 -> 80瓦 45瓦 CPU: 25瓦
GPU:35瓦
18.576分 8.218分
性能 120 -> 90 瓦 90 瓦 CPU:30瓦
GPU:75瓦
19.014分 11.398分

处理器 - 英特尔酷睿i9 13900H

英特尔 酷睿i9-13900H是一款高端移动处理器,拥有6个性能核心和8个效率核心,这就是为什么在任何时候都可以处理总共20个线程。然而,除了稍高的时钟频率之外,与酷睿i9-13900H没有任何区别。 酷睿i9-12900H.由于高功率限制,Zenbook Pro 14的性能非常好,尽管这里也必须说明,英特尔芯片只比新的 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS80瓦,尽管耗电量明显更高。在我们的CB R15多循环中,i9-13900H在运行几次后下降到90瓦,在这里它也比7940HS慢。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01553104656207759301085124013951550170518602015217023252480263527902945Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2643 (2455.49-3023.2)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2497 (2154.13-2705.63)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro: Ø2069 (2052.12-2075.23)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2785 (2743.48-2847.79)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2169 (2072.22-2636.96)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

另一方面,性能核心的单核性能仍然非常好:我们看到比目前的优势约为15%。AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS这里。主要竞争对手Apple MacBook Pro 14在原始CPU性能方面显然处于劣势,但34瓦的功耗也明显降低。MacBook还有一个优势,就是在电池模式下性能保持不变。然而,Zenbook的CPU在没有电源的情况下降到了微不足道的30瓦,导致多核测试中的性能损失约为45%。更多的CPU基准测试列在我们的 技术部分.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
82.2 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
79 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro -6!
Apple M2 Pro
76.6 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
76.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
72.2 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
70.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
65.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
64.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
19014 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
18131 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
17236 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11997 - 20385, n=28)
16813 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
15600 Points -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years)
15500 Points -18%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
15474 (14020.7min - 15473.8max) Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
14787 Points -22%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
2054 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
1966 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1297 - 2054, n=26)
1887 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
1836 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1789 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years)
1769 Points -14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1721 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
1647 Points -20%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
7289 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7111 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
6574 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (4935 - 7716, n=25)
6533 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
6007 Points -18%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
5986 Points -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years)
5687 Points -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
4044 Points -45%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
792 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
773 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (428 - 792, n=25)
720 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
708 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
696 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
662 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years)
651 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
447 Points -44%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
3023 (2455.49min - 3023.2max) Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2848 (2743.48min - 2847.79max) Points -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
2706 (2154.13min - 2705.63max) Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2061 - 3100, n=26)
2676 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
2637 (2072.22min - 2636.96max) Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2543 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years)
2445 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
2069 (2052.12min, 2054.58P1 - 2075.23max) Points -32%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
297 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
288 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
288 Points -3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
270 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (211 - 297, n=26)
269 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years)
258 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
249 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
230 Points -23%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -47%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
220 Seconds * -28%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
217 Seconds * -26%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (166 - 268, n=24)
205 Seconds * -19%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
183 Seconds * -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
182 Seconds * -6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
172 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
78016 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
73434 MIPS -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
71121 MIPS -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (45045 - 79032, n=25)
66435 MIPS -15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
63825 MIPS -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60219 MIPS -23%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
59413 MIPS -24%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6768 MIPS +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
6591 MIPS
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
6276 MIPS -5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
6124 MIPS -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3665 - 6600, n=25)
6054 MIPS -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5716 MIPS -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5367 MIPS -19%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
14859 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
14566 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
13241 Points -9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
12652 Points -13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (9094 - 15410, n=26)
12649 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
12215 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12179 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years)
12061 Points -17%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2022 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
2001 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
1961 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
1936 Points -3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
1900 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1140 - 2043, n=26)
1895 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years)
1826 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1661 Points -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
22.6 fps +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
20.9 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)
18.5 fps -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
18.2 fps -13%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
17.6 fps -16%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.3 fps -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps -22%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
50.7 s * -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)
47.6 s * -8%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
44.2 s *
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
43.5 s * +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.6 s * +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
38.3 s * +13%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.503 sec * -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.4845 sec * -19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)
0.4493 sec * -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4393 sec * -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4384 sec * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4167 sec * -2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4067 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3023 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
228 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
297 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7289 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
792 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2054 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19014 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
90.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
85.1 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84.9 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15979 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6788 - 19557, n=25)
15135 KRay/s -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
14979 KRay/s -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)
14392 KRay/s -10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13869 KRay/s -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
13493 KRay/s -16%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88148 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (22551 - 95579, n=25)
76236 Points -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)
72601 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
71736 Points -19%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71305 Points -19%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69120 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3989 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2491 - 4270, n=25)
3561 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3400 MB/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)
3385 MB/s -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3193 MB/s -20%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3146 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116624 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
109021 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106137 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (65121 - 120936, n=25)
105169 Points -10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
103652 Points -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)
90675 Points -22%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10498 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9706 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6108 - 11631, n=25)
9675 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9612 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)
9325 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8714 Points -17%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40277 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11283 - 48474, n=25)
37712 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)
36124 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
35720 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34034 Points -16%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33848 Points -16%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99217 MB/s +22%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3691 - 149377, n=25)
87238 MB/s +7%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81153 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75931 MB/s -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63380 MB/s -22%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
62599 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1206 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1064 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (789 - 1254, n=25)
1040 MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)
934 MB/s -23%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
918 MB/s -24%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
883 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8599 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3655 - 10716, n=25)
8215 KRay/s -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
7971 KRay/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)
7814 KRay/s -9%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
7475 KRay/s -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7268 KRay/s -15%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44101 MPixel/s +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
42346 MPixel/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40793 MPixel/s -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
40185 MPixel/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (10871 - 50488, n=25)
39722 MPixel/s -6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34573 MPixel/s -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34312 MPixel/s -19%

系统性能

系统性能非常好,良好的基准测试结果和我们主观的性能印象都证实了这一点。在测试过程中,我们没有遇到Zenbook Pro的问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8253 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5855 - 8538, n=8)
7664 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7578 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
7534 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7336 Points -3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
7253 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6789 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
11449 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11235 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10831 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (8835 - 11940, n=8)
10809 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10633 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10515 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10328 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10748 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10024 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9888 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7967 - 10991, n=8)
9840 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
9745 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8919 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8501 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13347 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7738 - 13575, n=8)
11549 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10997 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10637 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10632 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10350 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9194 Points -16%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1943 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1888 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1874 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1839 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1104 - 1974, n=7)
1815 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1812 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1730 Points -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years)
1719 Points -12%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1790 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1779 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1760 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1754 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1058 - 1914, n=7)
1720 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1641 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years)
1628 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1562 Points -13%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2330 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2254 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2137 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2104 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2085 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1178 - 2254, n=7)
1982 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years)
1932 Points -14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1883 Points -16%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1037 - 1952, n=7)
1650 Points +4%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1627 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1590 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1573 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1548 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1442 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years)
1441 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1333 Points -16%
PCMark 10 Score
7534 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
69078 MB/s +5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66025 MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65854 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (37448 - 74486, n=25)
61864 MB/s -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
61181 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55639 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70378 MB/s +1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
70185 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69799 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (41599 - 75433, n=25)
62438 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61461 MB/s -12%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57722 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
70291 MB/s +12%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69004 MB/s +10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67424 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (36152 - 88505, n=25)
65109 MB/s +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
62984 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58073 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
107 ns * -27%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 ns * -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93.1 ns * -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (75.8 - 102.3, n=25)
89.3 ns * -6%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.9 ns * -3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.5 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载),测试设备在目前的BIOS版本下使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1273.3 μs *
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1083.5 μs * +15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1003 μs * +21%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
933.2 μs * +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
762.5 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

M.2 2280 SSD可以被替换。
M.2 2280 SSD可以被替换。

我们的测试设备配备了美光3400 NVMe固态硬盘,它提供了2TB的存储容量(其中1.79TB在首次启动后可用)。这是一款快速的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,尽管三星和SK海力士的设备实现了略高的传输率。但这在日常使用中并不发挥主要作用;更重要的是在持续负载下性能保持稳定。更多的SSD基准测试列在 这里.

Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6571 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5141 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 481 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 485 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 146.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 489 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1037 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85 pt
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
 
80.9 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
72.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.8 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W -11!
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
69.5 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
67.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
63 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3873 (3844.57min - 3872.62max) MB/s +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3564 (3515.46min - 3563.69max) MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3540 (3522.04min - 3539.62max) MB/s +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3455 (3134.4min - 3455.07max) MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (3347 - 3531, n=4)
3421 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)
2979 MB/s -14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2511 (2497.5min - 2511.13max) MB/s -27%
seq write
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (3655 - 4880, n=4)
4193 MB/s +15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3845 (3754.57min - 3844.71max) MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3655 (3362.99min - 3654.53max) MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 (3391.93min - 3530.77max) MB/s -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3335 (3306.37min - 3334.51max) MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3172 (3139.23min - 3171.73max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)
3127 MB/s -14%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6923 (5804.08min - 6923.33max) MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6715 (5741.16min - 6715.28max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6663 (6017.91min - 6663.07max) MB/s +3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6570 (5809.83min - 6569.96max) MB/s +2%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (6449 - 6523, n=4)
6474 MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6449 (5385.49min - 6448.53max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)
5465 MB/s -15%
seq q8 t1 write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6104 (6052.8min - 6104.18max) MB/s +21%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5182 (5134.05min - 5181.56max) MB/s +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5063 (4789.75min - 5062.73max) MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (4803 - 5101, n=4)
5015 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4980 (4904.66min - 4979.58max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4967 (4954.31min - 4967.1max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)
4195 MB/s -17%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.2 (79.58min - 81.23max) MB/s +17%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
75.2 (69.76min - 75.19max) MB/s +8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
73.6 (72.25min - 73.56max) MB/s +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
69.5 (67.9min - 69.5max) MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (59.1 - 69.5, n=4)
66 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)
63.4 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
60.9 (60.82min - 60.92max) MB/s -12%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (147.3 - 253, n=4)
215 MB/s +46%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
212 (209.62min - 211.78max) MB/s +44%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
175.2 (173.12min - 175.17max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)
172 MB/s +17%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
149.7 (148.15min - 149.69max) MB/s +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
147.3 (146.61min - 147.27max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
100.1 (99.4min - 100.08max) MB/s -32%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4152 (4133.05min - 4152.1max) MB/s +470%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (729 - 3013, n=4)
2434 MB/s +234%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)
1407 MB/s +93%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1096 (1074.42min - 1096.28max) MB/s +50%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
729 (706.66min - 728.92max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
681 (654.71min - 680.72max) MB/s -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
663 (656.45min - 663.21max) MB/s -9%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3512 (3421.77min - 3511.78max) MB/s +548%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (542 - 2736, n=4)
2167 MB/s +300%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)
1059 MB/s +95%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
542 (534.57min - 541.67max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
510 (500.59min - 509.88max) MB/s -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
477 (463.61min - 476.76max) MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
444 (434.07min - 444.19max) MB/s -18%
AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7180 Points +42%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (5068 - 7774, n=3)
6563 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6037 Points +19%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5903 Points +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)
5101 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5068 Points
Score Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2858 Points +88%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (1517 - 2959, n=3)
2399 Points +58%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)
1646 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1582 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1517 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1433 Points -6%
Score Write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3834 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3732 Points +25%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (2686 - 3331, n=3)
2999 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2979 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2916 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)
2674 Points -10%
Seq Read
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5103.97 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4975 MB/s +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4836 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4623.95 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)
4257 MB/s -12%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (2272 - 5126, n=3)
4078 MB/s -16%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3551.32 MB/s +669%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2910 MB/s +530%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2808.19 MB/s +508%
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)
2791 MB/s +504%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (462 - 4546, n=3)
2766 MB/s +499%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
462 MB/s
4K Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
70.4 MB/s +10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
68.88 MB/s +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
64 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (55.9 - 67.7, n=3)
62.5 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)
62 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
60.3 MB/s -6%
4K Write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
247.17 MB/s +25%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (188.6 - 207, n=3)
197.7 MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
197.5 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)
190.9 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
183.9 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
169.2 MB/s -14%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2335.71 MB/s +141%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (969 - 2439, n=3)
1929 MB/s +99%
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)
1158 MB/s +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1014 MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
969 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
853.63 MB/s -12%
4K-64 Write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3305.51 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3272 MB/s +20%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2736 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (2168 - 2736, n=3)
2524 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2376.83 MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)
2204 MB/s -19%
Access Time Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.083 ms * -277%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)
0.05499 ms * -150%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.03 ms * -36%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (0.022 - 0.034, n=3)
0.02767 ms * -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.025 ms * -14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)
0.06101 ms * -205%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.053 ms * -165%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.024 ms * -20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.022 ms * -10%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
  (0.02 - 0.023, n=3)
0.021 ms * -5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.02 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03256509751300162519502275260029253250357539004225455048755200552558506175Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI: Ø6426 (5723.55-6476.01)

图形卡

GPU-Z 英特尔
GPU-Z 英特尔
GPU-Z Nvidia
GPU-Z Nvidia

Nvidia的新GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑带有8GB VRAM的CPU被用作专用显卡。根据驱动程序,我们安装了120瓦的变体,但我们只能从GPU中抽取最多95瓦(在压力测试中短暂的120瓦)。由于GPU在游戏过程中最多只消耗105-110瓦,这并不重要,整体性能非常好,尤其是考虑到14英寸的紧凑机箱。混合 模式默认是激活的,但如果需要,也可以完全停用集成GPU(这需要重新启动)。

例如,在合成基准测试中,Zenbook Pro 14也明显比新的RTX 4070笔记本电脑的50瓦变体快(60-80%)。戴尔XPS 15而且总体上也明显快于旧的 RTX 3070 Ti中的 Razer Blade 15.

GPU性能在持续负载下也完全保持稳定,因为它很容易通过Time Spy ,压力测试为99.5%。然而,在电池供电的情况下,GPU性能被限制在60瓦,这使性能降低了约23%。更多的GPU基准测试可在这里.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
56764 Points +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=63)
40427 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
40004 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
36023 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
29908 Points -25%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
24229 Points -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years)
20510 Points -49%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
42319 Points +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=67)
29070 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
29051 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
27183 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
22184 Points -24%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
16212 Points -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)
14739 Points -49%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
17885 Points +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=65)
11605 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11398 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10157 Points -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
8129 Points -29%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
6241 Points -45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)
5566 Points -51%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
34519 Points +63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17684 - 24275, n=9)
21668 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21125 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (1867 - 37434, n=44, last 2 years)
13668 Points -35%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
12968 Points -39%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1028 mpaths +74%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (434 - 686, n=48)
603 mpaths +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
592 mpaths
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
547 mpaths -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
445 mpaths -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (45 - 684, n=64, last 2 years)
276 mpaths -53%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
181222 Points +64%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
116873 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=64)
113923 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
110733 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
94390 Points -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
81359 Points -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10769 - 122560, n=86, last 2 years)
60430 Points -45%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
46941 Points -58%
Metal Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (34398 - 100376, n=10, last 2 years)
64336 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
52054 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL 6.0
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
160333 Points +59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (99967 - 122792, n=16)
113549 Points +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
104147 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
100544 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
76719 Points -24%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
74966 Points -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15229 - 119407, n=23, last 2 years)
60603 Points -40%
3DMark 11 Performance
34341 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
25794 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11666 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 105, n=46, last 2 years)
41.8 Seconds * -82%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
28 Seconds * -22%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
27 Seconds * -17%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
26 Seconds * -13%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
23 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=64)
21.5 Seconds * +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
13 Seconds * +43%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 181, n=47, last 2 years)
73.2 Seconds * -98%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
50 Seconds * -35%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
46 Seconds * -24%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
45 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=66)
40.3 Seconds * -9%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
37 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
23 Seconds * +38%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
97 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.8 - 132, n=10, last 2 years)
67.5 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

尽管华硕将Zenbook Pro 14宣传为创作者的笔记本电脑,但它也非常适用于游戏。它的性能 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑完全足以在QHD分辨率下进行流畅的游戏,即使在最新的游戏作品中也是如此。在较长的会议中,游戏性能也完全保持稳定。更多的GPU基准测试被列在 我们的技术部分.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.1 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85.9 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
76.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
44.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
150.6 (142min, 145P1) fps +43%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
143.2 fps +36%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105.3 (99min, 100P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96.4 (82min) fps -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69.8 (64min) fps -34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54.6 fps -48%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.7 (4.18min, 76.9P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
114 (8.13min, 83.3P1) fps -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (16.1min, 76.9P1) fps -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86.5 (7.43min, 55.6P1) fps -27%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.5 (4.22min, 37P1) fps -46%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years)
54 fps -54%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
145.5 fps +34%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
108.3 fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.3 fps -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84 fps -22%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66 fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years)
52 fps -52%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
274 (62.8min, 190P1) fps +41%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
194 fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
173.4 (30.1min, 131.1P1) fps -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
155.2 (31.9min, 117.3P1) fps -20%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.7 (64.5min, 88.7P1) fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years)
89.9 fps -54%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
162.2 (139.5min) fps
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
144.9 (127min) fps -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137 (116.5min) fps -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134.1 (115.7min) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
133 (114.4min) fps -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=83, last 2 years)
96.5 fps -41%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113.4 fps
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
105.4 fps -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
104 fps -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95 fps -16%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.6 fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.7 fps -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=83, last 2 years)
66.9 fps -41%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (123.9 - 268, n=40)
226 fps +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
223 fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
176.6 (154min) fps -21%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
163.5 fps -27%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
123.9 (119min) fps -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)
101.2 fps -55%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
57 fps -74%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
150.6 (142min, 145P1) fps +43%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
143.2 fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)
112.5 fps +7%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105.3 (99min, 100P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96.4 (82min) fps -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69.8 (64min) fps -34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54.6 fps -48%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
51 fps -52%
F1 22
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98.4 (83min, 66P1) fps +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (39.2 - 88.7, n=31)
73.8 fps +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.8 (60min, 43P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65.2 (55min, 49P1) fps -9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
52.4 (44min, 37P1) fps -27%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39.2 (15min, 15P1) fps -45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.23 - 72.6, n=50, last 2 years)
35.3 fps -51%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
65.9 (57min, 38P1) fps +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10.6 - 58.8, n=30)
47.4 fps +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47.1 (39min, 37P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42.3 (36min, 31P1) fps -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.58 - 47.1, n=24, last 2 years)
27.9 fps -41%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10.6 (8min, 8P1) fps -77%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
105.43 (41.37min) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48 - 110, n=24)
85.4 fps +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.2 - 103, n=27, last 2 years)
51.4 fps -37%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
48 (18.9min) fps -41%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78 (21.57min) fps +28%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30 - 63.9, n=24)
53.4 fps -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.6 - 89, n=17, last 2 years)
43.4 fps -29%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
30 (20.3min) fps -51%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
130 (99min) fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (92 - 158, n=36)
127.3 fps +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
126 (99min) fps +9%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (17 - 145, n=59, last 2 years)
69.5 fps -40%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
123 (95min) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (79 - 128, n=33)
108.9 fps +15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100 (90min) fps +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (26 - 117, n=31, last 2 years)
72.6 fps -24%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.3 (99-112)
CPU/GPU数据Witcher 3 (Ultra设置)
CPU/GPU数据Witcher 3 (Ultra设置)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 184.5 179.4 117.7 86.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 223 105.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 199.2 182.3 171.5 162.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 121.8 108.3 79.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 162.3 143.3 113.4
Far Cry 5 (2018) 119 118 116 95
Strange Brigade (2018) 249 215 194 132
F1 2021 (2021) 182.6 162.5 118.4 88.6
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 130 104 89 82 61
F1 22 (2022) 242 182 71.8 47.1

排放--好的扬声器

噪声

对于日常工作(或只要你不需要GPU性能),如果可能的话,你应该使用Whisper Standard 模式,因为Zenbook Pro 14然后经常保持沉默。你也应该测试一下标准 模式下的游戏,因为在许多情况下,性能仍然足够,而且该设备的噪音略低于41分贝(A),相比之下,性能 模式下的噪音略低于49分贝(A),更令人愉快。没有发现其他电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle
23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A)
Load
39.3 / 48.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2023.924.624.423.422.125.52524.129.426.92722.224.33125.324.723.924.722.422.14024.323.523.621.322.825.45021.720.319.720.320.222.9632121.319.418.320.421.88020.320.418.717.816.323.2100222120.117.416.320.312523.823.521.319.317.122.216023.32018.516.614.821.220026.222.519.417.515.721.725027.223.721.817.213.125.631529.12422.31812.624.940031.62625.119.511.726.15003326.825.518.510.727.263033.828.225.51910.928.480036.128.42820.210.131.4100035.427.125.317.510.229.9125037.428.927.318.510.330.9160038.729.127.318.910.331.7200040.630.62920.110.532.7250038.129.127.218.210.831.4315036.125.32417.111.128.7400037.526.326.818.611.430.5500036.72727.415.711.530.3630036.622.621.813.711.927.7800032.717.819.814.81221.6100002814.622.316.312.117.11250025.613.416.914.512.215.61600020.811.914.112.411.212.8SPL48.839.338.23023.341.9N6.43.12.81.30.53.8median 33median 25.3median 24median 17.5median 11.5median 27.2Delta5.643.61.61.24.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
-23%
6%
-12%
8%
-10%
off / environment *
23.3
25.2
-8%
23.9
-3%
23.3
-0%
23.1
1%
26
-12%
Idle Minimum *
23.3
25.2
-8%
23.9
-3%
23.6
-1%
23.1
1%
28
-20%
Idle Average *
23.3
25.2
-8%
23.9
-3%
23.6
-1%
23.1
1%
28
-20%
Idle Maximum *
23.3
32.5
-39%
23.9
-3%
33
-42%
24.2
-4%
28
-20%
Load Average *
39.3
59.7
-52%
26
34%
49.5
-26%
27.1
31%
38.5
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48.8
52.2
-7%
40.1
18%
Load Maximum *
48.8
60.9
-25%
43.2
11%
52.2
-7%
44.6
9%
43.9
10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

风扇在空转或轻度任务时经常被停用,但机箱在某些地方确实有点热,大约30℃。尽管如此,华硕还是很好地控制了负载下的温度,因为在压力测试和游戏过程中,键盘区域的最高温度为42℃,保持无害。在底部,有一个热点,在后部中心区域达到最高51℃,所以你应该避免在这里直接接触皮肤。

在压力测试中,显卡的功率大约为75瓦,并保持在这个数值。处理器就比较不稳定了,通常在35瓦左右,并不断有短时的向上峰值。

CPU/GPU性能压力测试
CPU/GPU性能压力测试
Max. Load
 39.2 °C40.6 °C38 °C 
 39 °C40.4 °C35.6 °C 
 28.5 °C27.8 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
44.6 °C49.5 °C46.6 °C
42 °C46.4 °C41 °C
32.1 °C33 °C31.7 °C
Maximum: 49.5 °C
Average: 40.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-1%
14%
2%
-7%
-13%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.6
37.1
9%
46.9
-16%
47
-16%
45.6
-12%
49.5
-22%
Maximum Bottom *
49.5
49.4
-0%
41.7
16%
46.5
6%
42
15%
47.5
4%
Idle Upper Side *
28.2
30
-6%
21.4
24%
25.9
8%
34.4
-22%
33.4
-18%
Idle Bottom *
30.6
32.4
-6%
21.4
30%
28
8%
33.2
-8%
35
-14%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

扬声器总体上提供了良好的音质。只有低音可以再强一点。虽然对于偶尔的视频和一些音乐来说绝对足够了,但由于风扇的原因,你最好使用耳机进行游戏。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2022.120.22522.224.53122.4214022.819.95020.221.26320.420.78016.332.310016.345.612517.15016014.849.720015.754.825013.157.731512.661.240011.763.950010.762.463010.964.680010.164.9100010.262.8125010.364.7160010.362.9200010.567.6250010.865.9315011.162.3400011.467.4500011.568.2630011.971.280001269.11000012.170.41250012.268.91600011.257.2SPL23.378.9N0.545.8median 11.5median 63.9Delta1.25.432.732.228.62824.428.231.434.42633.324.443.118.454.919.76616.367.113.763.917.466.317.769.415.472.811.473.31270.711.473.91073.410.271.91071.910.673.210.774.111.272.211.67511.969.912.372.812.469.912.665.812.565.912.465.111.864.523.984.30.566.6median 12median 70.71.93.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VIApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--120Hz的OLED会消耗大量的电力

消耗功率

200瓦的电源
200瓦的电源

OLED屏幕的功耗主要取决于显示的内容。我们测量了在黑暗的标准背景下,空闲时的最大功率略低于12瓦,但在有明亮的图片时,这个功率会进一步增加。一旦你观看HDR内容,消耗率会增加到28瓦。在压力测试中,我们登记的功率短时间内高达208瓦,但这很快就平息在~140瓦(也适用于游戏)。总体而言,200瓦的电源是足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.5 / 11.1 / 11.6 Watt
Load midlight 91.9 / 208 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14"
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
2%
35%
-17%
-44%
-134%
-49%
13%
Idle Minimum *
7.5
8.5
-13%
2.4
68%
9.4
-25%
20
-167%
31.6
-321%
12.4 ?(4.3 - 31, n=53)
-65%
Idle Average *
11.1
8.8
21%
11.3
-2%
14.2
-28%
20.7
-86%
33.3
-200%
17.5 ?(4.6 - 35.1, n=53)
-58%
Idle Maximum *
11.6
16.5
-42%
11.5
1%
14.5
-25%
22.4
-93%
38.6
-233%
24.2 ?(9 - 55.4, n=53)
-109%
Load Average *
91.9
102
-11%
59.6
35%
79
14%
77.1
16%
149
-62%
Witcher 3 ultra *
132.2
101.2
23%
55.9
58%
172
-30%
95.4
28%
149.6
-13%
Load Maximum *
208
140
33%
100
52%
220.8
-6%
133.4
36%
160
23%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø132.2 (129.8-137.2)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø141.7 (129.8-208)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.1 (6.56-14.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø112.9 (90.2-170)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø166 (158.8-168)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø53.6 (48.8-77.8)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø141.2 (127.5-167.3)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø118.6 (114.5-140)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø127.9 (118.7-132)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø13.3 (8.96-21.6)

电池寿命

充电周期
充电周期
76Wh电池
76Wh电池

76Wh的电池只能提供平均的电池运行时间,因为OLED屏幕需要大量的电力。我们在60赫兹下进行了测试(对于120赫兹,你可以减去大约半小时)。视频播放在150cd/m²(相当于测试设备中最大SDR亮度的73%)下运行了8.5小时,但在WLAN测试中只有7.5小时,或者在全亮度下只有不到6小时。一段最大亮度的HDR YouTube视频在3.5小时内耗尽了电池。MacBook Pro 14在各方面的持续时间要长得多。

当设备开机时,充满电大约需要105分钟;不到半小时就可以使用50%的容量。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 112)
7h 36min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 112)
5h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 31min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 58min
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, 70 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
59%
-6%
29%
15%
58%
H.264
511
917
79%
431
-16%
352
-31%
WiFi v1.3
456
807
77%
448
-2%
481
5%
274
-40%
Load
58
70
21%
58
0%
89
53%
125
116%

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳
+ 快速的硬件组件
+ 系统性能高
+ 大量的端口和快速的SD阅读器
+ 具有120赫兹的OLED面板,色彩表现准确
+ 包括手写笔
+ 针对PWM的软件解决方案

Cons

- 颗粒感最小的图片质量
- 16GB内存是焊接的
- DialPad只是一个噱头
- 在电池模式下性能明显下降
- 带PWM的OLED

结论 - Zenbook Pro 14提供了很多性能,但必须做出一些妥协

在审查中:华硕Zenbook Pro 14。测试设备由华硕德国提供。
在审查中:华硕Zenbook Pro 14。测试设备由华硕德国提供。

华硕新的Zenbook Pro 14是一款强大的14英寸设备,面向创意用户,因此与Apple MacBook Pro 14直接竞争。因此,制造商安装了英特尔和Nvidia的最新组件:无论是 酷睿i9-13900HGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑为这样一个紧凑的设备提供了大量的性能。Zenbook的性能也明显高于大型多媒体笔记本电脑,如新的 XPS 15 von Dell来自戴尔。

采用了一块120赫兹的OLED屏幕作为显示屏。主观的图像质量总体上非常好,但由于触摸屏的原因,明亮的地方会出现轻微的颗粒感。此外,PMW是从50%及以下的亮度开始使用的。与其他华硕OLED笔记本电脑一样,有一个软件功能允许OLED在没有PWM的情况下变暗,但用户每次都必须通过软件激活。各种颜色配置文件非常好;尤其是Display P3非常准确,不需要后续校准。然而,颜色配置文件在HDR模式下是不可用的,HDR功能在Apple MacBook Pro中简直好用得多,其迷你LED面板也能实现明显的高亮度值。

重点是性能:由于英特尔酷睿i9-13900H和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU,新的Zenbook Pro是一个非常快的14英寸笔记本。然而,OLED屏幕的画质颗粒度很小,在电池寿命方面也必须做出妥协。

该设备明显比许多其他14英寸笔记本电脑更笨重,但组件的冷却效果足够好,而且有足够的端口。由于采用了锥形的基本单元,制造商还很好地隐藏了外壳的厚度。然而,为了充分发挥GeForce RTX 4070的性能,用户需要激活性能 模式,在该模式下,风扇的声音明显变大。

键盘也只是平均水平,考虑到高昂的购买价格,这有点让人失望。触摸板左上方的额外DialPad也更像是一个噱头。Adobe应用程序的实施效果非常好,但最终,快捷键和组合键的效果更快。默认情况下,屏幕亮度和音量也可以用DialPad来调整,但这也可以通过专用的特殊键来更快地工作。另一个缺点是电池寿命(尤其是在激活120赫兹的情况下),更不用说价格了,在我们的案例中,价格高达 3,500欧元(约合3,750.00美元)。

一个大的竞争者当然是 Apple MacBook Pro 14在原始CPU和GPU性能方面有劣势,但总体上是更好的笔记本电脑。此外,如果你还想用笔记本来玩当前的游戏,那么MacBook并不是一个理想的选择。另一个有趣的竞争者来自华硕本身:虽然 ROG Zephyrus G14主要是一台游戏机,但它也同样可以用于创作目的(也可使用RTX 4070笔记本GPU)。哑光迷你LED或IPS面板(取决于配置)甚至赋予了OLED屏幕的一些优势。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

华硕Zenbook Pro 14 OLED的全球供应似乎有限。这款笔记本电脑在华硕的estore上售价为1799.99美元,但目前已经断货。

价格和供应情况截至12.06.2023,可能会有变化。

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI - 06/09/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
86%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
66 / 80 → 82%
Weight
67 / 20-72 → 90%
Battery
77 / 95 → 81%
Display
91%
Games Performance
99 / 90 → 100%
Application Performance
94 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
88 / 95 → 92%
Audio
84%
Camera
36 / 85 → 43%
Average
81%
89%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕Zenbook Pro 14 OLED笔记本电脑回顾:配备120赫兹OLED显示屏的MacBook Pro竞争对手
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-06-13 (Update: 2023-06-13)