Notebookcheck Logo
Lenovo Tab TB311FU review

联想 Tab 评测--10 英寸平板电脑是学校、大学和起居室的经济实惠的替代品

边框纤薄,价格低廉。

联想 Tab 是一款结构紧凑、价格实惠的平板电脑,其高分辨率显示屏、坚固的金属外壳和立体声扬声器给人留下了深刻印象。它可用于学校、大学或娱乐。我们将在测试中了解联想 Tab 是否值得购买。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Tablet

联想 Tab 的评价

联想 Tab 给人留下深刻印象的主要是其出色的显示屏:在同价位产品中,它具有高分辨率和高对比度,黑色值较低。它也没有 PWM 闪烁,甚至达到了相当高的色彩准确度。只是在户外使用不是很舒适,因为 430 cd/m² 左右的最大亮度太低了。

我们还喜欢立体声扬声器的音质,以及通过卫星定位平板电脑的功能--即使它并不总是 100% 准确。金属外壳显示出高质量的做工,尽管它并不能很好地保护显示屏免受压力。

150 欧元(约合 157 美元)的价格并不能让你期望它有多么强大,而一些竞争对手在这方面还是略胜一筹。此外,由于软件更新时间不确定,因此也不能指望它有多高的安全性。另一个缺点是电池容量略小:虽然它的电池续航时间还可以接受,但在这个价位的其他平板电脑上,你可以获得更长的续航时间。

如果你能接受这些限制,那么你就能以实惠的价格买到一款显示屏和扬声器都不错的优雅平板电脑。

Pros

+ 高品质金属外壳
+ 色彩还原度高的全高清屏幕
+ 良好的扬声器音效
+ 卫星定位
+ microSD 插槽
+ 良好的多任务软件
+ 无 PWM
+ 在负载情况下几乎不发热或节流

Cons

- 电池续航能力一般
- 无指纹传感器
- 更新时间不确定
- 对压力敏感的外壳
- 无 NFC
- 蹩脚的存储空间

价格和供应情况

虽然联想平板电脑(TB311FU)在测试期间尚未在美国上市,但已宣布将在欧洲、亚洲、中美洲、南美洲和非洲的许多全球市场上市。例如,这款配备 64 GB 存储空间的平板电脑可直接从联想网站购买,在英国的售价约为 140 英镑。在英国的售价约为 140 英镑。

Amazon Logo
$279.99
Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expansive Touchscreen Tablet - 12.7" 3K Display - 13MP Camera - 8GB Memory - 128GB UFS Storage - Android 13 - Dolby Atmos - Quad JBL Speakers - Pen and Folio Case Included
  • $199.99
    Lenovo Tab M11, 11” Display, MediaTek Helio G88 Octa-Core, 4GB RAM, 128GB SSD, 1920x1200 px, Ambient Light-Sensor, 10 Hour Battery, Comes w/Folio Case, Luna Grey
  • $118.99
    Lenovo Tab M9-2023 - Tablet - Long Battery Life - 9" HD - Front 2MP & Rear 8MP Camera - 3GB Memory - 32GB Storage - Android 12 or Later - Folio Case Included,Gray
Bestpreis 149€ expert TechnoMarkt
Lenovo Tab TB311XU, Luna Grey, 4GB RAM, 64GB (ZAEH0123SE)
2. 149 € Coolblue
3. 149 € expert.de
4. 149 € expert ecommerce

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
77.3%
Lenovo Tab
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $279.99
Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expans...
2. $199.99
Lenovo Tab M11, 11” Displa...
3. $118.99
Lenovo Tab M9-2023 - Tablet ...
List Price: 150€
424 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.10"
1920x1200
224 PPI
IPS
2.
79.3% v7 (old)
Teclast M50
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $8.99
[2 Pack] Designed for Teclas...
2. $9.95
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
3. $8.99
elitegadget 2-Pack Glass Scr...
List Price: 159€
460 g128 GB eMMC Flash10.10"
1280x800
149 PPI
IPS
3.
80.7% v7 (old)
Cubot Tab 50
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $16.99
Vaxson 2-Pack Back Protector...
2. $7.95
BoxWave Stylus Pouch Compati...
3. $11.90
Case Compatible for Cubot Ta...
List Price: 199€
455 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash10.40"
2000x1200
224 PPI
IPS
4.
76.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon: $113.00
List Price: 150€
373 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
IPS
5.
84.2% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
List Price: 249€480 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.00"
1920x1200
206 PPI
TFT-LCD

联想 Tab(型号为 TB311FU 或 TB311XU)适合那些不想花太多钱购买平板电脑,但又想获得高品质金属外壳、高分辨率显示屏和不错的扬声器的用户。此外,该平板电脑还可通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间,甚至还支持通过卫星定位。

联想 Tab 的显示屏为 10.1 英寸,尺寸并不大,因此即使是儿童也能享受使用它进行学习或娱乐的乐趣。

规格

Lenovo Tab
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, proximity, magentometer, gyroscope
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.5 x 235 x 154
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, USB cable, microSD tray tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
424 g
Price
150 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 经济实惠的金属外壳平板电脑

联想 Tab 的外壳采用金属一体化机身,目前只有月光灰一种颜色。由于在外壳上看不到天线的位置,我们猜测天线应该在摄像头周围的浅色区域后面,因为摄像头是由塑料制成的,所以对金属的屏蔽作用较小。

外壳做工干净利落,手指几乎感觉不到与显示屏玻璃之间的过渡。平板电脑采用圆角设计,手感也很舒适。不过,如果施加一些压力或试图翘起平板电脑,会很快导致屏幕液晶出现一些显示瑕疵。

这款平板电脑重 424 克(约 15 盎司),重量相对较轻,10.1 英寸的屏幕也使其相当小巧。显示屏边框足够纤薄,给人一种现代感,同时也为手指提供了足够的空间,使其在手持平板电脑时不会误操作触摸屏。

由于没有通过 IP 认证,因此应避免在多尘或潮湿的环境中使用平板电脑,也不要将水弄到平板电脑上。

联想 Tab TB311FU 评测
联想 Tab TB311FU 评测
联想 Tab TB311FU 评测
联想 Tab TB311FU 评测
联想 Tab TB311FU 评测

尺寸比较

257.1 mm 168.7 mm 6.9 mm 480 g246.4 mm 161.5 mm 7.7 mm 455 g238 mm 158 mm 8 mm 460 g235 mm 154 mm 9.5 mm 424 g211.6 mm 125.5 mm 8.8 mm 373 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

设备 - 两种存储版本

目前,联想 Tab 在欧洲有两种存储版本可供选择:

  • 4 GB 内存、64 GB 存储空间:149欧元(约合156美元)
  • 4GB 内存,128GB 存储空间:159欧元(约合167美元)

128 GB 存储容量的型号目前很难找到。由于价格相差不大,如果你能从信誉良好的供应商那里找到,就应该购买。

我们的测试机只配备了 WiFi。尽管芯片组允许推出 LTE 机型,但目前似乎还没有。

USB-C 端口在内部只能通过 USB-2.0 标准连接,因此数据传输难以加速,也无法进行有线图像输出。如果您的显示器支持Wi-Fi或拥有相应的加密狗,则可以通过Wi-Fi进行投屏。

尽管这款平板电脑的体积相当小巧,但遗憾的是它没有配备 NFC 功能,因此也不能用于无线支付。

右侧USB-C 端口、扬声器
右侧USB-C 端口、扬声器
左侧待机键、扬声器
左侧待机键、扬声器
底部:无连接
底部:无连接
顶部:microSD 插槽、麦克风、音量摇杆
顶部:microSD 插槽、麦克风、音量摇杆

microSD 读卡器

平板电脑的存储空间可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。当我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考存储卡测试读卡器的速度时,我们测得的传输速率在 40 MB/s 左右,在 CPDT 基准测试中也几乎没有下降。

因此,您可以轻松使用 microSD 卡来存储数据文件,因为数据的可用速度相对较快。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s +19%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
42.5 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
39.8 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years)
35.3 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
34.4 MB/s -14%
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606) (Angelbird V60)
30.5 MB/s -23%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.3 (29.9-45.4)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.9 (17.9-43.9)
Cubot Tab 50 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.6 (26.9-51.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36 (19.5-46.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.2 (15.5-80.5)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.6 (35.7-82.5)
Cubot Tab 50 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.5 (13.5-80.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.8 (13.6-78)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)

软件 - 不确定更新

联想的 ZUI 基于Android 14,有几个特点:联想 Tab 的操作系统非常强调多任务处理,允许多个应用程序并排或在窗口中运行,并提供一个任务栏,显示当前打开和使用最多的应用程序。此外,该系统还包括一个使用鼠标和键盘操作的特殊模式。

实际上,平板电脑上预装的应用程序很少。但由于我们测试的是 64GB 版本,如果你存储了很多图片和视频或安装了大型应用程序,存储空间还是会不够用。

令人惊讶的是,这款平板电脑没有任何软件更新信息,尽管联想在这方面通常都很认真。这可不是什么好兆头,尤其是我们系统的最后一次更新是在 2024 年 9 月 5 日,也就是本次测试的 5 个月前。但至少你还能从 Google Play 的更新中获得一些基本的安全保障。

联想 Tab 软件
联想 Tab 软件
联想 Tab 软件

可持续性

联想 Tab 的包装不含任何塑料。除此之外,没有关于该设备二氧化碳排放量或所用材料的信息。

目前,私人客户还无法获得替换零件(尚未提供)。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备卫星定位功能的联想平板电脑

我们的测试设备支持的最快无线局域网标准是 WiFi 5。有了它,联想 Tab 在 WLAN 测试中的速度可以达到 237 到 346 Mb/s。这也意味着传输速率会在一定范围内变化,但总体而言,在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中,传输速率相对稳定。

对于那些家里有千兆网络连接或办公室有光纤连接的人来说,所提供的传输速率并不足够,但其他人都可以通过这款路由器很好地利用他们的网络连接。

在靠近路由器的地方,我们可以看到完整的接收信号,网站的显示速度也可以接受。但是,在距离接入点 10 米(约 33 英尺)远的地方,穿过 3 面墙,信号强度就会下降一半,网页呈现速度也会明显下降。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1463, n=81, last 2 years)
519 MBit/s +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (356min - 387max) MBit/s +28%
Cubot Tab 50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (349min - 374max) MBit/s +26%
Teclast M50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
353 (331min - 359max) MBit/s +22%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=194)
350 MBit/s +21%
Lenovo Tab
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
289 (237min, 241.64P1 - 319max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
246 (171min - 290max) MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=81, last 2 years)
507 MBit/s +37%
Lenovo Tab
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
371 (342min, 345.77P1 - 389max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (338min - 385max) MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
340 (172min - 350max) MBit/s -8%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=193)
329 MBit/s -11%
Cubot Tab 50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
324 (292min - 336max) MBit/s -13%
Teclast M50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
302 (240min - 309max) MBit/s -19%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Lenovo Tab; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø289 (237-319)
Lenovo Tab; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø371 (342-389)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

如果打开地图应用程序,你会得到一个惊喜:尽管我们的测试设备不包括移动通信功能,但它仍然可以通过卫星定位。只要你带着联想 Tab 走出去,它就能迅速定位你的位置,精确度可达 3 米(约 10 英尺)。

当我们查看可用的卫星时,又会感到惊喜:这款平板电脑甚至包含了 SBAS,可以实现更精确的定位。

现在,我们真的很想知道,并带着这款平板电脑去骑车旅行,同时还带着 Garmin Venu 2 作为对比设备。

我们看到,联想 Tab 能够很好地定位自己的位置,即使是在移动中或困难的条件下。不过,定位并不总是完全准确,例如在转弯时将我们置于道路的错误一侧,或者穿过一堆车库或前院。而在老城区的小巷子里,平板电脑的定位也不总是百分之百准确。

但总的来说,如果你想要一个大屏幕,又不总是要求精确到米,联想平板电脑还是可以用来导航的。

联想 Tab 定位 - 概述
联想 Tab 定位 - 概述
联想 Tab 定位 - 转折点
联想 Tab 定位 - 转折点
联想 Tab 定位 - 桥接
联想 Tab 定位 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 桥
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 桥

摄像头 - 对于平板电脑来说还算不错

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

传统上,摄像头通常被视为平板电脑中不重要的部件,智能手机通常在这方面提供更好的技术。但联想 Tab 背面的 800 万像素主摄像头还是可以接受的,例如,你可以轻松地用它来读取二维码、扫描文件或捕捉快照。

在日光条件下,图像是可以接受的,不过很快就会曝光过度。细节清晰度最多只能达到中等水平。在光线不足或对比度较高的情况下,亮部的锐度和动态会损失更多。暗部的增亮效果非常有限。

视频最大可录制为 1080p 60 fps,但自动对焦功能在工作时会反复出现明显的抖动。

虽然 500 万像素的前置摄像头在视频会议时还可以使用,但拍摄出来的图像往往过于明亮,只能显示很少的细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
orginal image
click to load images

我们在测试实验室再次对主摄像头进行了测试。在全棚照明下,色彩还原相当温暖。但在细节方面,小文字已难以辨认,相机在处理红色背景时也存在一些问题。图像清晰度最多只能达到中等水平。

ColorChecker
5.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab: 6.15 ∆E min: 2.4 - max: 10.34 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38 ∆E
77.6 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab: 47.48 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 94.33 ∆E

配件和保修 - 24 个月保修

联想 Tab 的包装盒里没有充电器,但有一条 USB-C 数据线和一个打开 microSD 卡插槽的工具。

在联想的网上商店,你可以找到平板电脑的保护套,还可以作为平板电脑的支架。此外,还有一款非常坚固的儿童防撞保护套,内含触控笔,操作更方便。

联想为联想 Tab 提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器

联想 Tab 的触摸屏即使在边缘和角落也能可靠地操作。由于没有单独的手套模式,如果你想在寒冷的户外操作平板电脑,就必须使用裸露的手指。

平板电脑也没有指纹传感器,只能通过人脸识别解锁。解锁是通过前置摄像头完成的,在对平板电脑进行过一次训练后,解锁速度很快,而且相当可靠。显示屏亮度基本足够,即使在光线不好的情况下也能确保人脸识别成功。

不过,这种解锁方法不是很安全,可能会被人操纵。这也是Android 不允许在没有 3D 识别功能的情况下使用人脸解锁来解锁银行应用程序和其他需要高度安全的应用程序的原因。这样就只能输入密码或 PIN 码了。

键盘景观
键盘景观
键盘肖像
键盘肖像

显示屏 - 良好的图像质量

子像素网格
子像素网格

IPS 屏幕对角线为 10.1 英寸,分辨率为 1920x1200 像素。在这个价位的产品中,这实际上已经是相当高的分辨率了,而分辨率明显较低的显示器不在少数。联想 Tab 能够在屏幕上显示细腻的图像。

最高刷新率为 60 Hz,因此那些习惯于使用 90 或 120 Hz 智能手机的用户可能会注意到显示屏响应速度上的差异。

我们测量的最大亮度为 433 cd/m²。对于这个价位的平板电脑来说,这个亮度还算不错,但也有一些设备的亮度接近 500 cd/m²,例如 小米红米 Pad SE 8.7.

388
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
369
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 433 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 393.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 433 cd/m²
Contrast: 1804:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
94.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.311
Lenovo Tab
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Teclast M50
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"
Cubot Tab 50
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen
-115%
-131%
-20%
-78%
Brightness middle
433
371
-14%
308
-29%
499
15%
493
14%
Brightness
393
369
-6%
290
-26%
479
22%
460
17%
Brightness Distribution
85
87
2%
90
6%
90
6%
90
6%
Black Level *
0.24
0.45
-88%
0.45
-88%
0.37
-54%
0.35
-46%
Contrast
1804
824
-54%
684
-62%
1349
-25%
1409
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.09
7.46
-257%
8.72
-317%
3.68
-76%
6
-187%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.74
16.5
-341%
14.17
-279%
6.82
-82%
11.7
-213%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
7.4
-164%
9.9
-254%
1.9
32%
8.2
-193%
Gamma
2.311 95%
2.055 107%
2.306 95%
2.184 101%
2.21 100%
CCT
6104 106%
8423 77%
9817 66%
6787 96%
9131 71%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

联想 Tab 显示屏的黑色值为 0.24 cd/m²,一方面可以显示相当深的黑色色调,另一方面也带来了良好的对比度,使色彩显得相当鲜艳。

在标准色彩模式下,色彩还原相当准确,只有黄色和红色色调的偏差有点大。

幸运的是,我们无法检测到任何 PWM 闪烁。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.1 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.9 ms rise
↘ 24.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

联想 Tab 只在有限的范围内适合户外使用:在非常明亮的环境中,显示屏反光很厉害,很难看清内容。如果在户外使用平板电脑,最好选择阴凉处。

由于采用了 IPS 技术,视角稳定性非常好。即使在非常陡峭的视角下,也能看清显示屏上的图像,只有边缘部分会有轻微的暗影。

在户外使用平板电脑
在户外使用平板电脑
视角
视角

性能 - 入门级车型的动力

联想采用了 联发科 Helio G85作为 SoC。这款芯片已经有 5 年历史,但最初是用于中端产品。虽然这使得联想 Tab 的配置在 2025 年的同价位产品中足够出色,但你也可以用更少的钱买到性能更高的平板电脑。

当你在系统中冲浪时,你不得不期待一些卡顿和等待时间,尤其是当一些要求较高的应用程序在后台运行时。

该 SoC 也适合人工智能计算,在同价位产品中性能处于中等水平。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=76, last 2 years)
1085 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
919 Points +129%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
732 Points +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
403 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
402 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (366 - 416, n=5)
400 Points 0%
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
380 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=76, last 2 years)
3466 Points +148%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2040 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1993 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1449 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1396 Points
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1386 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1251 - 1449, n=5)
1367 Points -2%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)
712 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
693 Points +107%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
541 Points +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (335 - 437, n=16)
357 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
349 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
335 Points
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
309 Points -8%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)
2534 Points +92%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1818 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1768 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1456 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1184 - 1456, n=16)
1321 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1320 Points
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1305 Points -1%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=43, last 2 years)
772514 Points +177%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
422144 Points +51%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (278813 - 281399, n=2)
280106 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
278813 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
10550 Points +38%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)
10152 Points +33%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9586 Points +26%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 9437, n=14)
8086 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7985 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7622 Points
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
7383 Points -3%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)
786 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
578 Points +47%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
394 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
386 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (280 - 394, n=5)
351 Points -11%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=57, last 2 years)
4360 Points +109%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3596 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2270 Points +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2087 - 2422, n=7)
2258 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2087 Points
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7626 Points +81%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=57, last 2 years)
7371 Points +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4932 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (4213 - 5010, n=7)
4608 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4213 Points
Memory
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=57, last 2 years)
5080 Points +125%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3872 Points +72%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2253 - 3437, n=7)
2785 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2662 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2253 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=57, last 2 years)
9799 Points +451%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4337 Points +144%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1780 - 1960, n=7)
1842 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1810 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1780 Points
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1307 Points +16%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=57, last 2 years)
1292 Points +15%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1028 - 1198, n=7)
1129 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1122 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1118 Points 0%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=55, last 2 years)
11205 Points +151%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
5687 Points +27%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4472 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3849 - 5112, n=4)
4333 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3899 Points -13%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=49, last 2 years)
6855 Points +830%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (737 - 784, n=2)
761 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
737 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
429 Points -42%

图形计算速度相当慢,导致联想平板电脑即使在较旧的基准测试中也很难保持在 30 帧以上。对于 1440p 或 4K 分辨率的现代图形处理器来说,这款平板电脑的性能太弱了。

即使以显示屏的原生分辨率进行图形计算,也只能满足于相当低的帧率。

在 YouTube 上流畅播放 4K 视频时不会出现卡顿,只有在加载视频后偶尔会出现卡顿。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points +97%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
335 Points +86%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points -1%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
99 Points -45%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +98%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
344 Points +89%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -1%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
89 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +70%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1056 Points +49%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
710 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points -2%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
421 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1216 Points +70%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1165 Points +63%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
715 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points -3%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
426 Points -40%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3561 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3409 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2886 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
2659 Points -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2991 Points +148%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2449 Points +103%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1206 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
829 Points -31%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3075 Points +122%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2632 Points +90%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1385 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
979 Points -29%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +100%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps +24%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +121%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +52%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps +63%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +58%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +96%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +67%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +120%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps +87%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +60%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +127%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +73%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -7%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +113%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +57%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps +57%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +104%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +61%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps -4%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +145%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps +53%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.2 fps +36%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +148%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps +82%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -3%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +150%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +79%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +31%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +156%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +86%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -1%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -36%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +157%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.2 fps +57%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
0.8 fps -43%

在网上冲浪时,你需要时不时地拿出一些耐心:较大的网站可能需要很长时间才能完全加载。

即使在同价位的产品中,使用现代浏览器,我们的测试机在浏览器基准测试中也只能排在中游或靠后的位置。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=67, last 2 years)
117.8 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
96.598 Points +58%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
61.274 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
51.638 Points -16%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (29.2 - 61.3, n=8)
39.8 Points -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=59, last 2 years)
133.5 runs/min +186%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
71.6 runs/min +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
48.6 runs/min +4%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
46.7 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (27 - 48.6, n=7)
35.2 runs/min -25%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=33, last 2 years)
12 runs/min +299%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
3.11 runs/min +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.01 - 3.11, n=2)
3.06 runs/min +2%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
3.01 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=66, last 2 years)
112.2 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
107 Points +84%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
59 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
58 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (51 - 59, n=3)
56 Points -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
30093 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
29301 Points +90%
Cubot Tab 50 (Chrome 122)
21326 Points +38%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
15443 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
13605 Points -12%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 15443, n=14)
12959 Points -16%
Teclast M50 (Chrome 122)
12461 Points -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)
3702 ms * -37%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (2712 - 3939, n=8)
3334 ms * -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
2742 ms * -1%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
2711.6 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
1352.9 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

速度较慢的 eMMC 闪存已足以作为联想 Tab 和其他平板电脑(如 Cubot Tab 50等其他平板电脑表明,即使在这个价位,你也可以获得更先进的存储设备。

这意味着在传输文件时,加载时间会更长,速度也会更慢。

Lenovo TabTeclast M50Cubot Tab 50Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inchesSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
114%
-15%
55%
-39%
163%
Sequential Read 256KB
294
269.9
-8%
976.4
232%
289
-2%
485.96
65%
Sequential Write 256KB
255.3
196
-23%
374
46%
263.6
3%
476.37
87%
177 ?(40 - 274, n=205)
-31%
Random Read 4KB
119.5
69.6
-42%
183.3
53%
71.1
-41%
130.67
9%
Random Write 4KB
102
62.3
-39%
228.4
124%
82.7
-19%
162.9
60%

游戏 - 用联想 Tab 玩游戏

只有降低对联想 Tab 的期望值,才能真正体验到游戏的乐趣:虽然简单的休闲游戏在这款经济实惠的平板电脑上也能流畅运行,但要求苛刻的游戏,如《源氏冲击》或《PUBG Mobile》,即使在低设置下也只能以 30 fps 的速度运行。即便如此,流畅的渲染并不总是必然的,还会出现一些掉帧现象。我们使用GameBench 软件测试帧率。.

触摸屏非常适合游戏操作,位置传感器在《神庙逃亡》和《地铁冲浪者》等游戏中也能稳定工作。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Lenovo Tab; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø33 (17-40)
Lenovo Tab; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø25.7 (13-33)
Lenovo Tab; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø35.5 (14-41)
Lenovo Tab; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.6.0: Ø28.6 (24-31)

排放 - 几乎没有热量开发或节流

温度

在长时间负载的情况下,我们测得平板电脑外壳的最高温度为 33.5 °C(92.3 °F)。虽然这只是微不足道的现象,但绝非危急情况。因此,我们可以给这款平板电脑的温度管理打高分。

这一点在 3DMark 的压力测试中也很明显:即使在相同的基准测试运行 20 次之后,SoC 的性能也最多只是出现微小的下降。

Max. Load
 33.5 °C32.5 °C29.1 °C 
 32 °C31.6 °C28.6 °C 
 31.6 °C29.9 °C28 °C 
Maximum: 33.5 °C
Average: 30.8 °C
29.1 °C29.4 °C33.5 °C
29.1 °C30.4 °C31.8 °C
29.1 °C30.8 °C30.8 °C
Maximum: 33.5 °C
Average: 30.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.9 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 % 0%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 % 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 %
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93.1 % -6%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.7 % 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.4 %
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
85.3 % -13%
01234567Tooltip
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.092 (1.083-1.101)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.621 (0.58-0.68)
Cubot Tab 50 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.08 (2.06-2.08)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.083 (1.076-1.09)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.29 (4.25-4.3)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
Cubot Tab 50 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.06 (6.96-7.47)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.17 (4.14-4.19)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
热图前端
热图前端
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

可用的蓝牙音频编解码器
可用的蓝牙音频编解码器

联想 Tab 的两个扬声器位于平板电脑的侧边,横向握持时可产生一些轻微的立体声效果。

最大音量足以在中小型房间内聆听,而且声音实际上相当不错,特别是考虑到平板电脑的价格。虽然声音频谱中几乎没有真正的低音或中低音,但其余部分都很均衡,没有过分强调高音。因此,用这款平板电脑聆听流行音乐也是一种享受。

对于观看电影或连续剧,有些用户可能会想要更震撼的音效。为此,您可以通过 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙无线连接扬声器或耳机。这两种方法都能顺利使用。要进行蓝牙连接,两台设备都必须支持正确的音频编解码器。联想 Tab 支持这方面最重要的标准,甚至可以使用 LDAC 或 aptX HD 等高保真编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.540.12539.440.63136.3304033.5365037.737632725.18023.42410022.728.712519.234.216020.940.820019.646.925017.251.731516.855.340015.254.650016.156.363020.864.880020.670.2100018.572.2125016.775.1160018.272.5200015.968.825001569.9315017.969.4400020.868.3500021.269.6630019.372.3800020.473.61000018.576.61250016.264.81600016.252.3SPL30.983.3N1.456.3median 18.5median 68.3Delta1.99.728.642.525.932.923.426.127.330.736.230.625.429.816.629.216.93614.744.913.156.115.15314.355.211.658.810629.170.211.171.19.176.111.8821581.611.378.3127712.37712.77312.673.113.175.313.478.913.577.913.573.313.669.713.663.724.789.30.679.9median 13.1median 73.11.38.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo TabSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 可以更长

耗电量

就最低耗电量而言,联想 Tab 的效率并不高,电池耗电量为 1.7 瓦。其余功耗值处于平均水平,因此总体功耗不算太高,最高为 7.2 瓦。

该平板电脑的最大充电功率为 15 瓦,但不包括相应的充电器。联想 Tab 能够顺利使用我们测试的所有充电器。为平板电脑完全充电大约需要 1:45 小时。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.7 / 1.9 / 2.2 Watt
Load midlight 4.6 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab
5100 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G85
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
27%
-75%
15%
-79%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
0.9
47%
1
41%
1.043 ?(0.7 - 1.7, n=8)
39%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.2
37%
4.76
-151%
1.609 ?(0.9 - 2.9, n=8)
15%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
1.7
23%
4.79
-118%
1.988 ?(1.3 - 3, n=8)
10%
Load Average *
4.6
3.5
24%
9.52
-107%
4.27 ?(3.5 - 5.3, n=8)
7%
Load Maximum *
7.2
6.9
4%
9.92
-38%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Lenovo Tab; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.83 (1.707-7.17)
Lenovo Tab; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.862 (1.787-2.2)

Power Consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.32.62.833.33.53.744.24.4Tooltip
Lenovo Tab; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.29 (4.01-4.66)
Lenovo Tab; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.862 (1.787-2.2)

电池寿命

一旦 5100 毫安时容量的电池充满电,你可以使用联想 Tab 在无线局域网中冲浪长达 11:45 小时,或使用内部存储空间观看电影长达 12:39 小时。

虽然这对于平时远离电源插座的一天来说已经足够,但还有其他平板电脑,如 小米红米 Pad SE 8.7等平板电脑的续航时间要长得多。联想 Tab 的电池容量相对较小,这一点在这里变得很明显。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 28min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 39min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 02min
Lenovo Tab
5100 mAh
Teclast M50
6000 mAh
Cubot Tab 50
7500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
5%
20%
45%
13%
Reader / Idle
1948
2236
15%
2275
17%
H.264
759
1268
67%
800
5%
WiFi v1.3
705
742
5%
844
20%
1222
73%
920
30%
Load
242
302
25%
243
0%

笔记本检查总体评价

测试联想 Tab。测试设备由联想德国公司提供。
测试联想 Tab。测试设备由联想德国公司提供。

联想 Tab 是一款经济实惠的平板电脑,体积小巧,显示屏分辨率较高,只要降低要求就能获得足够的性能。我们尤其喜欢它的扬声器和通过卫星定位的功能。

另一方面,电池容量较小,续航时间不长,软件更新也不多。

Lenovo Tab - 02/15/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
36 / 69 → 52%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 93%
Battery
89%
Display
85%
Games Performance
3 / 65 → 5%
Application Performance
42 / 92 → 46%
AI Performance
5%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 82%
Camera
45 / 90 → 50%
Average
54%
77%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
5%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
95.2%
Repairability
8%
Software Updates
5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 33.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 Tab 评测--10 英寸平板电脑是学校、大学和起居室的经济实惠的替代品
Florian Schmitt, 2025-02-16 (Update: 2025-02-16)