Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 review

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 平板电脑评测--与 iPad mini 一样小巧,但价格便宜得多

无处不在

你已经可以在网上以 100 美元左右的价格买到小米红米 Pad SE 8.7。价格如此低廉的便携式平板电脑是否能同时提供流畅的操作和视频流?我们的评测将揭示我们是买到了便宜货,还是低性能将成为一个问题。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Tablet

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 的评价

随着小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 的推出,制造商为市场带来了一款方便携带的平板电脑,它的屏幕面积大大超过了智能手机。屏幕本身可以变得相当明亮,而且不会出现 PWM 闪烁,但低分辨率无法提供特别清晰的图像。

一方面,处理器提供了比通常情况下这一非常实惠的价格区间更强的性能,但另一方面,它也无法完全避免性能卡顿和更长的加载时间。在相当简单的照相系统方面,你也不得不做出妥协。

我们喜欢它 3 年更新的承诺,但在使平板电脑适合长期使用和使用可持续材料方面所做的进一步努力却很难让人注意到。

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 售价不到 100 美元,却能让你得到很多:90 Hz 显示屏或红外发射器,让你可以将平板电脑用作电视遥控器。此外,它还拥有超长的电池续航时间,甚至还配备了 4G 模块。

当然,对于像 iPad Mini,小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 在性能和外壳质量上都无法与之匹敌。但如果你不想花那么多钱,小米还是有很多东西可以提供给你的。

Pros

+ 超长运行时间
+ 价格非常低
+ 在同价位产品中性能尚可
+ 亮度适中的 90 Hz 显示屏
+ 无 PWM
+ 红外线触发器
+ 承诺 3 年更新
+ 还提供 4G 模块

Cons

- 屏幕分辨率低
- 扬声器高音偏重
- 相机成像质量一般
- 充电时间较长
- 无指纹传感器
- 在可持续发展方面鲜有建树

价格和供应情况

在我们进行评测时,一些零售商对小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 的报价约为 119 英镑,甚至包括制造商本身(英国现价)。

Amazon Logo
$123.50
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se 8.7 Only WiFi 8.7" Octa Core 2.0GHZ HyperOS 6650mAh Bluetooth 5.3 8MP (Auora Green (WiFi), 128GB + 4GB)

潜在的竞争对手比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
76.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon: $123.50
List Price: 150€
373 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
IPS
2.
80.4% v7 (old)
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
2 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $79.99
List Price: 115€
337 g32 GB eMMC Flash8.00"
1280x800
189 PPI
LCD
3.
84.1% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $119.99
List Price: 179€
332 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
LCD TFT
4.
82.2% v7 (old)
Lenovo Tab M9
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $125.00
List Price: 160€
344 g32 GB eMMC Flash9.00"
1340x800
173 PPI
IPS
5.
82.2% v7 (old)
Nokia T10
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $169.99
List Price: 169€
375 g32 GB eMMC Flash8.00"
1280x800
189 PPI
IPS

我们已经评测过较大的 小米红米 Pad SE现在轮到更便携的 8.7 英寸版本了。当时,我们已经确认,更大的红米 Pad SE 具有极高的性价比,但 Pad SE 8.7 的价格要便宜得多。

到目前为止,小米还从未推出过如此便携的平板电脑,但 iPad Mini 的成功 Apple 迷你版的成功已经激励了多家厂商将更小的机型重新推向市场。根据要求,这款小巧的小米平板电脑还可以提供 4G,这使它成为一款令人兴奋的设备,尤其是对于预算紧张的用户来说。

规格

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Redmi Pad Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
8.70 inch 15:9, 1340 x 800 pixel 179 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Hall Sensor, Virtual Proximity Sensor, Virtual Light Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 211.6 x 125.5
Battery
6650 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18-watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
373 g
Price
150 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

这款平板电脑重 373 克,在同类产品中属于中等重量。如果你喜欢更轻便的设备,三星 Tab A9 会让你物有所值。 三星Galaxy Tab A9.正面的屏幕边框不太厚,给平板电脑带来了现代感。不过,您仍然可以舒适地将它握在手中,而不会误操作触摸屏。

尺寸比较

215.4 mm 136.8 mm 8 mm 344 g211.6 mm 125.5 mm 8.8 mm 373 g211 mm 124.7 mm 8 mm 332 g208 mm 123.2 mm 9 mm 375 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 337 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

功能 - 两种存储类型,如有需要,还可支持 LTE

用户可以获得两种存储版本的红米 Pad SE 8.7:

4GB内存/64GB大容量存储:150美元

4GB内存/128GB大容量存储:170美元

不过,无论是在互联网上还是从制造商本身来看,价格都已经大幅下降,有时甚至可以以 100 美元左右的价格买到这款设备。

此外,该机还提供 4G 调制解调器和双卡双待功能,但 SoC 仍保持不变。制造商加价 30 美元。

USB-C 端口只能以 USB 2.0 的速度进行内部连接,这意味着数据传输需要一段时间,而且无法通过 USB-C 端口输出图像。不过,您可以将图像无线传输到支持 Wi-Fi 的屏幕上。

microSD 读卡器

microSD 读卡器是一个独立的项目,因此 4G 版的红米 Pad SE 8.7 还可以在同时插入存储卡的情况下进行双卡双待操作。

在速度方面,与其他廉价和小巧的平板电脑相比,读卡器的表现还算不错。不过,如果你看看我们参考的 micro SD 卡(天使鸟 V60)的最大可能传输速度,就会发现读卡器根本无法达到这些速度。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
48.7 MB/s +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
34.4 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.4 MB/s 0%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606) (Angelbird V60)
29.6 MB/s -14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s -40%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80 (Angelbird V60)
19.8 MB/s -42%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36 (19.5-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.8 (13.6-78)

软件 - 甚至附带更新承诺

小米这款价廉物美的小平板电脑拥有Android 14,为小米内部操作系统 HyperOS 1.0.4 提供了基础。

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 印有 "Android 企业推荐 "标志,这意味着小米承诺最迟每 90 天安装一次安全更新。这种情况应持续到 2027 年 8 月,换句话说,也就是从设备发布起的 3 年内。新的Android 版本应在Android 16 之前提供。

这意味着小米为这样一款廉价的平板电脑提供了体面的更新供应,而其他供应商有时在这个价格范围内根本不作任何承诺。而三星则表明,更新时间更长也是可能的。

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 软件
小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 软件
小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 软件

可持续性

因此,未来几年的基本更新供应是有保障的。

没有关于产品所用材料的信息,小米似乎也不太重视包装的可持续性:既不使用塑料,也不使用不含石油的印刷油墨。最新的 ESG 报告中有关可持续发展的信息较为笼统。中有关可持续发展的信息较为笼统。

耗电量相对较低。不过,至少在这款产品上,小米在环境保护方面所做的努力总体上并不十分可信。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 机载 WiFi 5

最快的 Wi-Fi 标准是 WiFi 5。我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE 11000 测试了数据传输速度。

,我们可以确定接收方向的速度约为 369 Mbit/s,与同类平板电脑大致相当。在数据速度方面,传输也相当稳定。不过,在发送方向上,偶尔会出现速度下降到每秒 200 Mbit 以下的情况。

如前所述,只有价格稍高的小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 版本才配备了 4G 模块。此外,还安装了用于卫星定位的 GNSS 模块。我们的评测设备只能通过已知的 Wi-Fi 网络进行近似定位,因此无法在旅途中进行导航。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1710, n=83, last 2 years)
540 MBit/s +120%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
374 (360min - 392max) MBit/s +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
372 (189min - 388max) MBit/s +51%
Lenovo Tab M9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (346min - 374max) MBit/s +50%
Nokia T10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (333min - 367max) MBit/s +45%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=183)
353 MBit/s +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
246 (171min - 290max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=83, last 2 years)
522 MBit/s +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (338min - 385max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
368 (359min - 369max) MBit/s 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
349 (337min - 355max) MBit/s -5%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=182)
327 MBit/s -11%
Lenovo Tab M9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
326 (271min - 340max) MBit/s -12%
Nokia T10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
304 (279min - 315max) MBit/s -18%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø245 (171-290)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (338-385)

相机 - 最适合拍摄快照

前置摄像头图像
前置摄像头图像

便携式小米平板绝对不是拍照专家,你只能使用后置的 800 万像素摄像头。在光线良好的情况下,它能拍摄出可用的快照,例如,足以记录某个场景。

在光线不足和对比度较高的情况下,我们无法在极亮和极暗的区域获得良好的动态范围,这也是细节再现相当一般的一个方面。

使用评测设备的摄像头时,照相馆中光线充足的测试图相当模糊。在 1 勒克斯照明下,图像中什么也看不到。

主摄像头可以录制最高 1080p 和 30fps 的视频。

前置 500 万像素摄像头用于自拍。照片效果相当不错,明亮的背景仍然可以辨认,曝光也不会过高。不过,放大后几乎看不到任何细节,因此最好以较小的格式查看图像。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera environmentMain camera low light


ColorChecker
3.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches: 6.74 ∆E min: 2.49 - max: 12.54 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
77.4 ∆E
44 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches: 47.12 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 94.34 ∆E

配件和保修 - 红米 Pad SE 8.7 不含充电器

红米 Pad SE 8.7 没有配备充电器,只有一根 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。此外,还可在小米网站上购买带腕带的专用保护套,在评测时,制造商收取 10 美元的费用。

,制造商提供 24 个月的保修服务。 保修保修。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器

这款平板电脑提供了一块 8.7 英寸的触摸屏,刷新率高达 90 Hz。通常可以流畅地滚动菜单,但在某些地方也会出现等待时间和卡顿现象,这主要是由于 SoC 速度较慢和大容量存储迟缓造成的。

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 没有指纹传感器。不过,你可以使用前置摄像头进行面部识别。这可以非常可靠、快速地解锁平板电脑。即使在较暗的地方,屏幕光线通常也足以进行识别。

机壳右侧的物理按键很容易找到和操作。不过,它们对平板电脑位置的变化没有反应,因此音量摇杆的上半部分总是在增大音量,即使平板电脑是反过来拿的。

键盘肖像
键盘肖像
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - 变得相当明亮

子像素图像
子像素图像

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 配备了帧速率高达 90 Hz 的 IPS 显示屏。

小米规定的最大显示亮度约为 500 cd/m²,我们在使用分光光度计进行的测试中非常准确地达到了这一数值。在室外模式下(可通过设置激活),最高亮度可达 600 cd/m²,但这会导致设备明显发热并消耗大量电池。因此,我们不建议长时间使用它。

在 "标准 "模式下,我们获得了最佳的色彩表现,灰阶中只有非常轻微的蓝色色调。颜色往往显得有点太暗,尤其是强烈的棕色和蓝色调。

502
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 502 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 479.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 499 cd/m²
Contrast: 1349:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.184
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7"
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
LCD, 1280x800, 8"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7"
Lenovo Tab M9
IPS, 1340x800, 9"
Nokia T10
IPS, 1280x800, 8"
Screen
-24%
-40%
-13%
-52%
Brightness middle
499
388
-22%
486
-3%
405
-19%
446
-11%
Brightness
479
364
-24%
462
-4%
368
-23%
429
-10%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
92
2%
83
-8%
94
4%
Black Level *
0.37
0.36
3%
0.35
5%
0.17
54%
0.65
-76%
Contrast
1349
1078
-20%
1389
3%
2382
77%
686
-49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.68
4.38
-19%
6.2
-68%
5.15
-40%
4.87
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.82
10.7
-57%
10.4
-52%
10.12
-48%
9.85
-44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
2.9
-53%
5.7
-200%
3.7
-95%
5.7
-200%
Gamma
2.184 101%
2.232 99%
2.12 104%
2.287 96%
2.189 101%
CCT
6787 96%
6221 104%
7911 82%
7379 88%
7781 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

即使在屏幕亮度很低的情况下,我们也没有观察到任何 PWM 闪烁。不过,对于要求较高的用户来说,响应时间可能太慢了。

卡尔曼灰阶
卡尔曼灰阶
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 22.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.2 ms rise
↘ 23.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外,小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 的屏幕在阳光不太强烈的日子里表现相当不错。不过,直射光照射在屏幕上会产生明显的反光。

即使从很宽的角度观看,屏幕内容仍然清晰可见。不过,侧面会有轻微的阴影。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 处理器的最佳选择

在 SoC 方面,小米平板电脑采用了 联发科 Helio G85.对于一款廉价平板电脑来说,它是一个可靠的选择,但并不总是能完全流畅地浏览菜单。特别是在重启系统后,需要几分钟时间才能合理快速地处理命令。

播放 1,440p 的 YouTube 视频也很不流畅。所有低于这一分辨率的视频,包括 60fps 的 1080p 视频,都能流畅运行。

在系统和处理器基准测试中,红米 Pad SE 8.7 的性能在同价位产品中相当强劲,仅次于 三星Galaxy Tab A9.不过,当涉及到人工智能计算时,你就不要指望它有高水平的性能了。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)
1111 Points +176%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
738 Points +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
403 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (366 - 416, n=4)
399 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)
3544 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2065 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1449 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1251 - 1449, n=4)
1360 Points -6%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
565 Points +62%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (341 - 437, n=15)
358 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
349 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
338 Points -3%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
310 Points -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
Points -100%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1981 Points +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1456 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1184 - 1456, n=15)
1321 Points -9%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
1256 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1241 Points -15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9083 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 9437, n=13)
8122 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7985 Points
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
6916 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
6709 Points -16%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
5028 Points -37%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
573 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
386 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
348 Points -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (280 - 386, n=4)
340 Points -12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4205 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3120 Points +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2138 - 2422, n=6)
2286 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2270 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2072 Points -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
444 Points -80%
System
Average of class Tablet
  (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7265 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6776 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4932 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (4353 - 5010, n=6)
4674 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
4045 Points -18%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
2793 Points -43%
Memory
Average of class Tablet
  (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4862 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4152 Points +56%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2536 - 3437, n=6)
2874 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2662 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2343 Points -12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
1236 Points -54%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9168 Points +407%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2683 Points +48%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1810 - 1960, n=6)
1852 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1818 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1810 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
1182 Points -35%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1273 Points +14%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1028 - 1198, n=6)
1130 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1118 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1069 Points -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
10 Points -99%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11323 Points +190%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6453 Points +66%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3849 - 5112, n=3)
4287 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
3992 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3899 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
3028 Points -22%

图形基准测试结果表明,使用集成图形芯片流畅播放渲染内容(同样是 1080p)时非常吃力。即使在屏幕的原生分辨率下,内容也不应包含太多现代图形效果,以确保流畅的帧速率。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points +94%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
110 Points -38%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 Points +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
177 Points -2%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
114 Points -37%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1225 Points +77%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
705 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
411 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1256 Points +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
692 Points 0%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
412 Points -41%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps +16%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +58%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +49%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +82%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps +79%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +79%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.8 fps -30%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +93%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -21%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.8 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +122%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.1 fps -12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6.6 fps -19%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.6 fps +75%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4.1 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps -3%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +136%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +9%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +9%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.7 fps -9%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -35%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps +71%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
0.84 fps -40%

在大型网站上,你往往需要等待一段时间才能加载完所有内容。即使加载时间为 10 秒,在滚动时仍会遇到正在加载的图片。对于这样一款价格低廉的平板电脑来说,它的浏览器性能相当不错,比大多数同类设备都要快一些。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
111.2 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
71.728 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
51.638 Points
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
38.697 Points -25%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (29.2 - 52.8, n=7)
36.7 Points -29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
23.534 Points -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
121.9 runs/min +151%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
61.2 runs/min +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
48.6 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (27 - 48.6, n=6)
33.3 runs/min -31%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chome 110)
30 runs/min -38%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
15.76 runs/min -68%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=26, last 2 years)
13.1 runs/min +321%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
3.11 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G85 ()
3.11 runs/min 0%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)
106.9 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
81 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
59 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (51 - 59, n=2)
55 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
45 Points -24%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
25 Points -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
22187 Points +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
13605 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 15430, n=13)
12768 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
12163 Points -11%
Nokia T10 (Chrome 109)
9871 Points -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
5843 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
9435.4 ms * -244%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -36%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
3467.2 ms * -26%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (2742 - 3939, n=7)
3422 ms * -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
2742 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
1922.1 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

不幸的是,eMMC 闪存速度慢通常是廉价平板电脑设备的一部分,小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 就是如此。这意味着数据无法快速传输,加载时间明显延长。三星 三星Galaxy Tab A9向我们展示了事实并非如此。

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inchesAmazon Fire HD 8 2022Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Lenovo Tab M9Nokia T10Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-46%
120%
2%
-12%
-29%
180%
Sequential Read 256KB
289
270.37
-6%
916.45
217%
274.3
-5%
273.5
-5%
Sequential Write 256KB
263.6
113.44
-57%
398.32
51%
184.4
-30%
191.5
-27%
176.6 ?(40 - 274, n=204)
-33%
Random Read 4KB
71.1
39.46
-45%
182.74
157%
95.2
34%
71.4
0%
Random Write 4KB
82.7
19.81
-76%
128.92
56%
91
10%
71.5
-14%

游戏 - 不是真正的游戏玩家

说到在小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 上玩游戏,你应该降低一点期望值:正如我们对《PUBG Mobile》和《Genshin Impact》的测试所示,在要求较高的游戏中,你很难达到 40fps 以上。此外,最好关闭复杂特效。否则会出现卡顿。我们使用GameBench软件进行分析。

通过 90 Hz 屏幕和位置传感器(如果需要)进行操作非常流畅。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.2.0_28336591_28351161: Ø27.8 (7-37)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.2.0_28336591_28351161: Ø23.6 (6-30)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.5.0: Ø37.1 (21-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.5.0: Ø29 (15-31)

排放--热量不是问题

温度

关于外壳,红米平板电脑没有温度过高的问题:即使在长时间使用后,我们测得的最高温度也只有 38.9 °C,这只是稍微明显一点。

SoC 也没有受到温度问题的影响:即使多次运行 3DMark Wild Life 或 Wild Life Extreme,我们仍然得到了几乎相同的结果。

Max. Load
 29.9 °C28.8 °C33 °C 
 30.9 °C30.5 °C33.8 °C 
 29.6 °C29.8 °C33.4 °C 
Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 31.1 °C
38.3 °C35.4 °C28.4 °C
38.9 °C32 °C28 °C
33.7 °C31.9 °C29.4 °C
Maximum: 38.9 °C
Average: 32.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.2 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 %
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 % -1%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
96.8 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.7 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.1 % -1%
正面热图
正面热图
后方热图
后方热图

发言人

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 内置立体声扬声器,可以产生非常响亮的音效。音乐播放时高音偏重,如果能更多地强调中低音,声音会更好。

通过蓝牙或 3.5 毫米音频接口的有线方式,使用优质耳机或外置扬声器可以获得更好的音效。目前几乎所有的无线音频编解码器都可用,因此您在连接蓝牙耳机时应该不会遇到什么问题,而且音质很好。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.948.52540.639.83134.834.14034.434.95037.839.16327.730.38018.422.910021.22512524.429.916023.637.720022.444.825019.550.531519.856.640014.458.850012.863.863014.265.880013.169.4100012.474.6125010.777.9160010.877.1200010.572.1250011.271.9315011.770.4400012.266.5500011.967630012.174.6800012.277.11000012.176.81250011.863.51600011.453.6SPL2585.6N0.762.3median 12.2median 66.5Delta2.69.439.244.134.442.430.832.733.431.33438.629.830.228.919.519.22321.332.218.240.913.845.21452.313.354.3115510.95910.363.515.865.816.166.317.36811.469.911.268.411.571.41269.912.966.713.56614.166.71568.815.864.216.554.117.346.126.179.80.745.6median 14median 64.22.59hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inchesLenovo Tab M9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab M9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 红米 Pad SE 8.7 拥有无尽的续航能力

耗电量

我们确定了红米 Pad SE 8.7 在各种情况下所需的电量,并观察到了良好、较低的测量值:无论是空闲模式还是负载模式,耗电量都相当低。

其他廉价平板电脑,如 亚马逊 Fire HD 8等其他廉价平板电脑在某些情况下的耗电量略低,但性能也明显较低。

平板电脑的最大充电功率为 18 瓦。该平板电脑不附带充电器,但与我们测试过的充电器配合使用效果良好。由于电池容量大,电池完成一个完整的充电周期并恢复到 100% 仍需要 2 小时 30 分钟。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.2 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 3.5 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Nokia T10
5250 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G85
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
3%
-66%
-25%
-15%
-148%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.2
-33%
0.7
22%
1.6
-78%
0.949 ?(0.7 - 1.7, n=7)
-5%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.4
-17%
2.94
-145%
1.7
-42%
1.567 ?(0.9 - 2.9, n=7)
-31%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
1.7
-0%
3.03
-78%
1.8
-6%
1.957 ?(1.3 - 3, n=7)
-15%
Load Average *
3.5
2.5
29%
7.49
-114%
2.8
20%
4.22 ?(3.5 - 5.3, n=7)
-21%
Load Maximum *
6.9
4.3
38%
8.02
-16%
8.1
-17%
6.94 ?(6.11 - 8.5, n=7)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.2 (0.924-6.92)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (0.896-1.612)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.50.70.91.11.21.41.61.81.92.12.32.52.62.833.23.3Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.74 (2.15-3.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (0.896-1.612)

电池运行时间

小米配备了一块容量高达 6650 毫安时的电池。这意味着红米 Pad SE 8.7 可以长时间运行:我们在固定屏幕亮度的 Wi-Fi 测试中测得了 20 小时 22 分钟。

这明显长于同类设备;如果在关闭 Wi-Fi 模块的情况下观看下载的电影,甚至可以运行超过 21 小时。

在负载情况下,平板电脑可持续运行约 5 个小时,然后才需要重新插入电源。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
20h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 02min
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Nokia T10
5250 mAh
Battery Runtime
-23%
-16%
-20%
-19%
Reader / Idle
2236
1931
-14%
2132
-5%
H.264
1268
1158
-9%
987
-22%
WiFi v1.3
1222
935
-23%
857
-30%
955
-22%
984
-19%
Load
302
274
-9%
206
-32%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 便携、耐用,最重要的是价格实惠。

说到摄像头的图像质量或屏幕分辨率,你不应该期望它能创造奇迹。但它性能稳定,蓝牙编解码器选择丰富,甚至还有 3 年的更新承诺,这在这个价位的手机中并不多见。

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches - 12/09/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
75 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
33 / 69 → 48%
Weight
85 / 40-88 → 94%
Battery
92%
Display
80%
Games Performance
3 / 65 → 4%
Application Performance
43 / 92 → 46%
AI Performance
5%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
43 / 90 → 47%
Average
53%
77%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
95.9%
Repairability
25%
Software Updates
46.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 32.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 平板电脑评测--与 iPad mini 一样小巧,但价格便宜得多
Florian Schmitt, 2024-12-12 (Update: 2024-12-12)