联想 Tab K11 Plus 评测--配备手写笔、大屏幕和金属外壳的家庭平板电脑

Name: Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Brand: Lenovo

每个人都能找到

11.45 英寸的联想 Tab K11 Plus 拥有一款优秀的冲浪和多媒体平板电脑所需的一切。除了 90-Hz IPS 面板外，它还具有 4 扬声器环绕音效、Netflix 兼容性和适用于所有家庭成员的用户账户。这款兼容手写笔的平板电脑还可选择 LTE 版本。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 01/25/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

联想 Tab K11 Plus 的评价：优点多多，缺点多多

联想 Tab K11 Plus 是一款经济实惠、设备齐全的平板电脑，适合日常使用，由于采用了窄边框和金属外壳，它看起来非常吸引人。

在网上冲浪和多媒体应用时，这款 11.45 英寸的平板电脑采用了无 PWM 的 IPS 面板，能以 2K 分辨率和 90Hz 的帧速率清晰流畅地显示内容。4 个经过精心调校的杜比 Atmos 扬声器可提供伴音效果。

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

联想 Tab K11 Plus 的其他优势还包括：不错的摄像头、充足的存储空间、手写笔兼容性和稳定的电池续航能力。可选的 LTE 支持更是锦上添花。

但另一方面，该设备的更新周期非常短，即使对于一款经济型平板电脑来说也是如此。根据联想的说法，安全更新将于 2026 年 7 月结束，即仅 1.5 年。

Pros

+ 稳定美观的金属外壳

+ 90 赫兹显示

+ 大量存储空间

+ DRM WideVine L1

+ 支持触控笔

+ 4 个扬声器提供良好音效

+ 无 PWM

Cons

- 性能有限

- 相机性能一般

- 更新时间短

- 蓝牙编解码器数量少

价格和供应情况

截至发稿时，联想 Tab K11 Plus 尚未在联想在线商店上市。

据说它的最高售价约为 250 美元。

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 78.1%	Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $297.82 Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre... 2. $49.53 Tab Pen Plus for Lenovo Tab ... 3. $49.49 Tab Pen Plus for Lenovo Tab ...	520 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11.45" 2000x1200 204 PPI IPS
2. 76.2%	Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A ⎘ ARM Mali-G51 MP4 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.0	Amazon: 1. $31.99 GYSDCAZ Spanish Ñ Keyboard ... 2. $36.99 GYSDCAZ Spanish Ñ Keyboard ... 3. $9.96 Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass... List Price: 219€	475 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	11.00" 1900x1200 204 PPI LCD
3. 83.4% ^{v7 (old)}	Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC	Amazon: $199.99 List Price: 199€	465 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	11.00" 1920x1200 206 PPI IPS
4. 84.2% ^{v7 (old)}	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1	List Price: 249€	480 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11.00" 1920x1200 206 PPI TFT-LCD
5. 73.8%	Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $139.99 TECLAST Tablet 11 inch Andro... 2. $249.99 TECLAST T65Max Tablet, 13" A... 3. $107.99 TECLAST Android Tablet with ...	545 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10.95" 1280x800 138 PPI IPS
6. 83.5% ^{v7 (old)}	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC	Amazon: $183.51 List Price: 199.9€	481 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	11.00" 1920x1200 206 PPI TFT-LCD

联想 Tab K11 Plus 的评价：优点多多，缺点多多
规格
外壳 - 采用铝制外壳的联想 Tab K11 Plus
连接性 - 4 个扬声器、高达 256 GB 的存储空间以及可选的 LTE 模块
软件 -Android 14 和短暂的更新期
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 6 的联想 Tab K11 Plus
摄像头 - 1300 万像素摄像头，配备 LED 闪光灯，可拍摄快照
附件和保修 - 交货范围包括一个 20 瓦的电源装置
输入设备和操作 - 带有操作按钮的联想 Tab K11 Plus
显示屏 - 2K 分辨率、90 赫兹刷新率的 IPS 面板
性能 - 配备高通骁龙 680 处理器的联想平板电脑
游戏 - 仅在低细节级别时显示流畅
发射 - 4 个扬声器发出立体声
电池寿命 - 约 2 小时充满电
Notebookcheck 总评分

联想 Tab K11 Plus 是一款新的经济型冲浪和多媒体平板电脑。不过，由于它太新，在撰写本文时，网上还很难找到它的身影。不过值得庆幸的是，现在可以对这款 11.45 英寸的设备进行很好的价格比较。这表明，250 美元左右的起价就能买到价值不菲的平板电脑。

联想 Tab K11 Plus 采用 90-Hz IPS 屏幕，支持手写笔和 2K 分辨率。它采用了可靠的中端 SoC--即高通骁龙 680-内存。标准配置包括 NFC、蓝牙 5.3 和 WiFi 6，此外还有 LTE 版本的 Tab K11 Plus 可供选择。配备 128 GB 存储空间和 6 GB 内存的价格约为 230 美元，配备 8 GB 内存的价格约为 250 美元。此外，还有配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间的版本，价格略高于 300 美元。国际市场上也有 4 GB 内存的机型。

规格

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

11.45 inch 15:9, 2000 x 1200 pixel 204 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, IPS, HDR10 & HLG support, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 233 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Ambient light, Gyroscope, Hall, Proximity, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 Level 3

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.15 x 268.7 x 168.96

Battery

8600 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 20W max. charging speed

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix FF

Additional features

Speakers: Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable (USB 2.0), 20W charger (up to 10V/2A), SIM tool, quick start guide, warranty information, 24 Months Warranty, IP52 rating, fanless

Weight

520 g, Power Supply: 58 g

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - 采用铝制外壳的联想 Tab K11 Plus

联想 Tab K11 Plus 采用灰色金属外壳（配色为月光灰），重量为 520 克，比较容易握持。背面顶部，在略微突出的摄像头模块高度处有一条塑料条贯穿整个平板电脑，以提高接收效果。与外壳一样，平板电脑的边框也由金属制成。

由于采用了做工精良的铝制外壳，联想 Tab K11 Plus 在很大程度上可以抵御扭曲和凹陷的尝试。联想还为其平板电脑颁发了 IP52 认证。这意味着 Tab K11 Plus 可以防尘、防水，并能承受几滴雨水。不过，它还不够坚固耐用，例如，打翻的水杯不会对它造成伤害。

屏幕四周的边框宽约 9 毫米，不会让 Tab K11 Plus 显得笨重，而且足够宽的边框可以防止手指误触 IPS 面板。联想提供可选的Lenovo Tab Pen Plus手写笔。制造商没有提供任何有关平板电脑显示屏玻璃防护等级的信息。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Teclast P50 Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Lenovo Tab M11 Huawei MatePad SE 11 DIN A5 ❌

连接性 - 4 个扬声器、高达 256 GB 的存储空间以及可选的 LTE 模块

联想为 Tab K11 Plus 提供多种存储配置，包括 4 至 8 GB LPDDR4x 内存和 128 或 256 GB UFS 2.2 存储空间。

最大的配置就是我们的测试设备。Tab K11 Plus 的 USB OTG 就绪 USB-C 端口以 USB 2.0 的速度工作，因此不能用于有线图像传输。

Tab K11 Plus 提供一系列可靠的接口，包括 NFC、蓝牙 5.3、WiFi 6 和 3.5 毫米耳机插孔，并有四个兼容杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）的扬声器。可通过底部的 4 个 Pogo 插针连接一个单独提供的充电底座。

该平板电脑还可选配 LTE 模块。除了最大 1 TB 的 microSD 卡外，Tab K11 Plus 还可以容纳一张 nano SIM 卡。

microSD 读卡器

使用我们的 microSD 参考卡 Angelbird AV Pro V60，平板电脑的 microSD 读卡器显示出了同类产品的典型性能。在我们的测试中，它的数据传输基本稳定，与大多数竞争对手的数据传输一样高。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	47.18 MB/s +38%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606) (Angelbird V60)	39.8 MB/s +17%
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=60, last 2 years)	34.7 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88 (Angelbird V60)	34.4 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (Angelbird V60)	34.1 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	28.92 MB/s -15%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40 (31.2-49.9)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.7 (33.8-88)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)

软件 -Android 14 和短暂的更新期

除了联想 Vantage 支持工具、两款为手写笔量身定制的应用程序（笔记应用程序 Nebo 和计算器应用程序 MyScript Calculator 2）以及另外两款第三方应用程序（Tide、WPS Office）之外，联想 Tab K11 Plus 还配备了几乎纯粹的Android 14。

联想为谷歌操作系统添加了方便的窗口视图。兼容的应用程序，如 Chrome 浏览器、照片和 YouTube，可以分屏显示，也可以在可自由定位的窗口中打开。由于平板电脑支持 DRM WideVine L1，它还能以高清质量播放受拷贝保护的流媒体，因此非常适合观看 Netflix 电影等。

在软件支持方面，该设备并没有给我们留下非常好的印象。在 2025 年 1 月进行测试时，其Android 安全补丁的日期是 2024 年 10 月 5 日，因此已经过时。

更严重的是，它的更新周期非常短。Tab K11 Plus 只进行了一次操作系统升级，即使在这个价位上也不算多。此外，根据联想升级矩阵（Lenovo Upgrade Matrix），Android 安全更新的供应将于明年 7 月结束，因此很难对联想 Tab K11 Plus 进行长期规划。

可持续性

Tab K11 Plus 的外壳和边框使用了再生铝。联想没有具体说明使用的程度。它的包装不使用塑料，由竹子和甘蔗等生物基材料组成。联想承诺到 2050 年实现气候中和。该制造商还提供CO² 抵消服务。该服务可以补偿联想设备在生产、交付和使用过程中产生的二氧化碳排放。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 6 的联想 Tab K11 Plus

由于支持 WiFi 6，联想 Tab K11 Plus 的性能高于同价位平板电脑的平均水平。它还配备了现代蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC。不过，在实际使用中，你不会注意到它的良好 Wi-Fi 设备，因为在我们的测试中，这款平板电脑的运行速度并不比对比设备快，对比设备都使用 Wi-Fi 5。它无法使用 6 GHz 频段。

这导致 Tab K11 Plus 在连接到我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000）时，WiFi 5 的典型传输速率约为 300 到 350 MBit/s。其传输速率并不特别稳定。

联想为 Tab K11 Plus 提供了可选的 LTE 模块。由于我们只测试了该平板电脑的 WiFi 版本，因此无法对其功能做出任何说明。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (305 - 1757, n=124)	861 MBit/s +173%
Average of class Tablet (10.5 - 1710, n=83, last 2 years)	528 MBit/s +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	369 (356^min - 387^max) MBit/s +17%
Lenovo Tab M11 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	360 (353^min - 368^max) MBit/s +14%
Teclast P50 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	357 (337^min - 370^max) MBit/s +13%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	315 (223^min - 362^max) MBit/s
Huawei MatePad SE 11 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	279 (228^min - 295^max) MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (234 - 1696, n=122)	825 MBit/s +134%
Average of class Tablet (20.1 - 1705, n=83, last 2 years)	511 MBit/s +45%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	352 (125^min - 381^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	340 (172^min - 350^max) MBit/s -3%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	323 (218^min - 377^max) MBit/s -8%
Teclast P50 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	318 (280^min - 333^max) MBit/s -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	307 (284^min - 322^max) MBit/s -13%
Lenovo Tab M11 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	304 (283^min - 325^max) MBit/s -14%

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø315 (223-362)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø352 (125-381)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)

联想 Tab K11 支持所有重要的卫星导航服务，如 GPS、Glonass、Galileo 和北斗。4G 版本还包括 A-GPS。在我们的测试过程中，无论我们是长时间待在一个地方还是骑车旅行，它都能相当准确地在地图上定位。与以精确定位能力著称的 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比，联想平板电脑的整体表现几乎毫不逊色。虽然时不时会出现一些小误差，但从大局来看并不明显。

摄像头 - 1300 万像素摄像头，配备 LED 闪光灯，可拍摄快照

联想对其平板电脑的摄像头功能只字未提，因此很容易被忽视。背面有一个 1300 万像素的自动对焦摄像头，两侧是 LED 闪光灯，在日光下能拍出相当不错的快照。只是由于照片的细节水平较低，因此不宜放大。在弱光环境下，照片的色彩依然真实，但亮度有限。

主摄像头（和自拍摄像头）可以录制高达 1080p 的视频，最高每秒 30 帧。不过，自动对焦的反应速度相对较慢，导致在录制过程中自动对焦调节时出现清晰的 "抽风 "图像。

与 1300 万像素主摄像头一样，隐藏在显示屏边框中的 800 万像素自拍摄像头也需要良好的环境光线，才能获得至少快照质量。不过，它也能拍出不错的照片，偶尔自拍和视频通话也没问题。不过，一般来说，照片看起来比较苍白，细节也不多。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 Low-light photo

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在我们的测试实验室中，当我们创造了最佳的照明条件时，主摄像头非常准确地再现了 ColorChecker 测试图的色彩（最大 Delta-E 值为 10.81）。它也能完全捕捉到测试图，但不能在每个点上都清晰地显示出来，而且在处理淡色时也很吃力。主摄像头完全被 1 勒克斯的残余光线所淹没，然后只能生成嘈杂、昏暗的图像。

附件和保修 - 交货范围包括一个 20 瓦的电源装置

该平板电脑的供货范围包括一条 USB-C 线缆（USB 2.0）、一个 20 瓦的电源适配器（最高 10V/2A）、一个 SIM 卡工具以及一份快速入门指南和保修信息。

联想提供了与平板电脑配套的联想 Tab Pen Plus 触控笔，它具有 4096 级压力和倾斜度以及一个用于充电的 USB-C 端口。除了蓝牙键盘，你还可以从联想商店购买联想智能充电站 2 扩展坞，它可以连接到平板电脑的 4 个 pogo 针。在测试时，联想在线商店还没有提供这种充电站，但你可以从第三方供应商那里购买。

在美国，联想 Tab K11 Plus 享有 12 个月的标准保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 带有操作按钮的联想 Tab K11 Plus

得益于 90-Hz 的刷新率，该设备的 2K 触摸屏可以流畅地显示内容，并对输入做出快速响应。联想 Tab K11 Plus 没有配备指纹传感器。不过，这款平板电脑可以通过 2D 面部识别技术进行生物识别登录，只要环境光线充足，这种技术就能可靠地工作。

联想 Tab K11 Plus 还有一个红色的特殊操作按钮。它位于顶部音量摇杆旁边，可以通过按下它来启动应用程序、打开网站或打开手电筒等。它可以分配两个功能。按下一次按钮会触发第一个设定的操作，按下两次则会触发第二个操作。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 2K 分辨率、90 赫兹刷新率的 IPS 面板

联想 Tab K11 Plus 的 11.45 英寸 IPS 屏幕分辨率为 2000 x 1200 像素（宽高比为 15:9），支持 HDR10 和 HLG。显示屏使用 90 Hz 的固定刷新率运行，在Android 设置中无法更改。根据 DRM Info 应用程序，IPS 屏幕不支持任何其他刷新率。

与同价位的对比设备相比，联想 Tab K11 Plus 的 IPS 面板显示屏对比度非常高（1892:1）。它的亮度再次与竞争对手不相上下，平均为 449 cd/m²，在同类产品中属于典型水平。当显示较小的图像部分时（APL18 测量值），IPS 显示屏的亮度会增加到 479 cd/m²。

我们没有注意到 IPS 面板上出现任何 PWM 闪烁。


429 cd/m²	434 cd/m²	476 cd/m²
433 cd/m²	473 cd/m²	466 cd/m²
414 cd/m²	454 cd/m²	463 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 476 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 449.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 473 cd/m²
Contrast: 1892:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.178

	Lenovo Tab K11 Plus IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"	Huawei MatePad SE 11 LCD, 1900x1200, 11"	Lenovo Tab M11 IPS, 1920x1200, 11"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"	Teclast P50 IPS, 1280x800, 11"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen		-37%	-128%	-135%	-101%	-35%
Brightness middle	473	461 -3%	431 -9%	493 4%	441 -7%	473 0%
Brightness	449	451 0%	405 -10%	460 2%	416 -7%	449 0%
Brightness Distribution	87	87 0%	88 1%	90 3%	90 3%	85 -2%
Black Level *	0.25	0.3 -20%	0.4 -60%	0.35 -40%	0.4 -60%	0.28 -12%
Contrast	1892	1537 -19%	1078 -43%	1409 -26%	1103 -42%	1689 -11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.56	2.48 -59%	9.72 -523%	6 -285%	5.01 -221%	3 -92%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.8	4.9 -29%	11.59 -205%	11.7 -208%	8.57 -126%	6 -58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.3	3.5 -169%	3.6 -177%	8.2 -531%	5.8 -346%	2.7 -108%
Gamma	2.178 ^101%	2.183 ^101%	2.194 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.3 ^96%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6726 ^97%	7471 ^87%	7348 ^88%	9131 ^71%	8477 ^77%	6589 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

联想 Tab K11 Plus 的 IPS 面板使用 "自然 "色彩模式可获得最佳画质。在我们的测试中，色彩和灰度与理想值的偏差很小，色温和伽玛值也是如此。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.1 ms rise
27.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.2 ms rise
40.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

联想平板电脑只能在室外有限的范围内使用。在阴凉处，屏幕亮度足以盖过光线反射。而在阳光直射或间接照射的情况下，可视角度稳定的显示屏上的内容就不再特别容易阅读了。

性能 - 配备高通骁龙 680 处理器的联想平板电脑

联想 Tab K11 Plus 采用了高通骁龙 680，其性能在日常使用中没有问题。不过，在操作过程中时不时会出现一些小的卡顿或延迟。不过，考虑到其价格区间，这款平板电脑的性能还是相当稳定的，在我们的测试中，它在对比设备中处于中场位置。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=73, last 2 years)	1072 Points +160%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	919 Points +123%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	436 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (412 - 436, n=6)	420 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	413 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	412 Points
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	377 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	323 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=73, last 2 years)	3425 Points +140%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1993 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1439 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	1425 Points
Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1379 Points -3%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	1364 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (865 - 1450, n=6)	1253 Points -12%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1172 Points -18%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=40, last 2 years)	745314 Points +126%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	422144 Points +28%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	329731 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (287727 - 329731, n=3)	311635 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	287727 Points -13%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	245797 Points -25%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	235067 Points -29%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	10550 Points +21%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9888 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	9802 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	8752 Points
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	7327 Points -16%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	7102 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	7068 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4535 - 8752, n=16)	6766 Points -23%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	763 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	578 Points +38%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	419 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	402 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (325 - 419, n=9)	379 Points -10%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	348 Points -17%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	337 Points -20%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (195 - 11721, n=58, last 2 years)	4166 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3596 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2383 - 2738, n=9)	2559 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2551 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	2383 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2187 Points -8%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	1925 Points -19%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	7626 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 16435, n=58, last 2 years)	7184 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5259 - 5852, n=9)	5665 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5580 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	5259 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	4598 Points -13%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	4181 Points -20%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (401 - 10977, n=58, last 2 years)	4788 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3872 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2554 - 3824, n=9)	3284 Points +29%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	3128 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3120 Points +22%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	2954 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	2554 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (418 - 57192, n=58, last 2 years)	9007 Points +302%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4337 Points +93%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	2243 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2179 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1994 - 2243, n=9)	2146 Points -4%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1438 Points -36%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	1021 Points -54%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1307 Points +22%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=58, last 2 years)	1279 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1116 Points +4%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	1090 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (917 - 1199, n=9)	1077 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	1071 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1046 Points -2%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years)	10729 Points +181%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	5687 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (3820 - 4853, n=7)	4321 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4150 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	3820 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	3564 Points -7%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	3164 Points -17%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7227 Points +2701%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	429 Points +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	348 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (258 - 348, n=4)	296 Points +15%
Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144	279 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	258 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	248 Points -4%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Tablet (99.7 - 7341, n=4, last 2 years)	1986 Points +1658%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	113 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ()	113 Points 0%

钛 Adreno 610帮助骁龙 680进行图形计算。它的性能足以满足大多数应用的需求，但并不能使联想 Tab K11 Plus 成为一款游戏平板电脑--即使游戏可以在较低分辨率下流畅运行。三星三星Galaxy Tab A9+在这方面的表现要好得多。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 Points +179%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	178 Points +40%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	158 Points +24%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	127 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	121 Points -5%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	361 Points +193%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	179 Points +46%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	155 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	123 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	123 Points
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	117 Points -5%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points +107%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	700 Points +20%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	583 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	579 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	574 Points -2%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	423 Points -27%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1216 Points +103%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	702 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	598 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	589 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	576 Points -4%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	429 Points -28%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3409 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2935 Points +17%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2652 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2499 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2499 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points -16%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2991 Points +126%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1325 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1309 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1203 Points -9%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	985 Points -26%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	830 Points -37%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3075 Points +108%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1479 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1429 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1385 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	1121 Points -24%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	980 Points -34%

联想 Tab K11 Plus 在浏览器基准测试中表现出色，排名第二，仅次于三星Galaxy Tab A9+.之所以能取得如此好的成绩，可能主要是因为它的浏览器版本更先进。尽管如此，您还是可以在联想平板电脑上流畅地上网，而且网站打开速度很快。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=67, last 2 years)	113.8 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	96.598 Points +46%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)	66.048 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	52.9 Points -20%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	52.153 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (35.7 - 66, n=9)	48.1 Points -27%
Huawei MatePad SE 11	35.847 Points -46%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=60, last 2 years)	127 runs/min +105%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	71.6 runs/min +16%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)	61.9 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	53.5 runs/min -14%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	48 runs/min -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (32.7 - 65.3, n=9)	45.4 runs/min -27%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=28, last 2 years)	12.4 runs/min +235%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)	3.7 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ()	3.7 runs/min 0%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	3.01 runs/min -19%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)	1.25 runs/min -66%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=66, last 2 years)	109.6 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	107 Points +57%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)	68 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	57 Points -16%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	54 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (41 - 68, n=6)	53.8 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)	39 Points -43%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	29301 Points +78%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29091 Points +76%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)	16498 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)	14279 Points -13%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	13455 Points -18%
Lenovo Tab M11 (Chrome 124)	13413 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6358 - 16498, n=13)	12138 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)	10018 Points -39%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)	3747 ms * -52%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)	3675.3 ms * -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2459 - 3461, n=8)	2958 ms * -20%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	2903.5 ms * -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	2650.1 ms * -8%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)	2459.4 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	1352.9 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

许多廉价平板电脑依赖于速度较慢的 eMMC 闪存，而联想 Tab K11 Plus 则利用了速度更快的 UFS 2.2 存储。它的高连续数据吞吐量通过极短的应用程序加载时间表现得非常明显。

	Lenovo Tab K11 Plus	Huawei MatePad SE 11	Lenovo Tab M11	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	Teclast P50	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-54%	-65%	-44%	-44%	-60%	-8%	-15%
Sequential Read 256KB	1003.25	528.79 -47%	294.5 -71%	485.96 -52%	879.52 -12%	297.47 -70%	896 ?(482 - 1023, n=35) -11%	1041 ?(126.9 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 4%
Sequential Write 256KB	876.29	103.41 -88%	256.9 -71%	476.37 -46%	191.5 -78%	228.97 -74%	710 ?(369 - 913, n=35) -19%	692 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -21%
Random Read 4KB	244.03	166.24 -32%	95.6 -61%	130.67 -46%	122.95 -50%	102.41 -58%	229 ?(99.7 - 291, n=35) -6%	190.7 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -22%
Random Write 4KB	232.16	119.02 -49%	101.2 -56%	162.9 -30%	153.65 -34%	146.92 -37%	240 ?(99.2 - 319, n=35) 3%	189.1 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -19%

游戏 - 仅在低细节级别时显示流畅

联想 Tab K11 Plus 的四个扬声器为游戏提供了良好的音效。不过，它只能流畅地呈现较低细节级别的游戏。我们使用Gamebench测试工具测量了帧率。

在运行《PUBG Mobile》时，Tab K11 Plus 在最大可选图形设置 "平衡/高"（Balanced/High）下的平均帧数接近 30 帧/秒，而在较低的细节级别（Liquid）下甚至能达到几乎稳定的 40 帧/秒。

在玩要求更高的游戏《源氏冲击》时，帧数的波动明显更大。在最低图形级别下，这款冒险角色扮演游戏仍然很容易上手，但在全细节级别下，它的帧数就降低到了每秒 13 帧以下，显得非常卡顿。

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.3.0_29183395_29332470: Ø29.3 (23-37)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.3.0_29183395_29332470: Ø12.6 (8-17)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø39.8 (31-41)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 3.6.0: Ø29.9 (22-31)

发射 - 4 个扬声器发出立体声

温度

无论负载如何，联想 Tab K11 Plus 都能在运行过程中保持凉爽。3DMark 压力测试显示，即使在连续负载的情况下，这款平板电脑实际上也能始终发挥其全部性能。

Max. Load

Idle


32.9 °C	32.2 °C	27.5 °C
30.7 °C	29.4 °C	27.5 °C
30 °C	28.7 °C	26.9 °C

Maximum: 32.9 °C
Average: 29.5 °C


29.2 °C	35.3 °C	32.3 °C
28.1 °C	29.4 °C	30.5 °C
28.3 °C	28.6 °C	29.7 °C

Maximum: 35.3 °C
Average: 30.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.7 %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	99.1 % -1%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	98.9 % -1%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.7 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 % +1%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	98.1 % +1%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	97.8 % 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.6 %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	97.3 % 0%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	96.5 % -1%

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.758 (0.748-0.766)

Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.92 (0.91-0.928)

Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.088 (1.072-1.097)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)

Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.699 (0.686-0.71)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.56 (3.55-3.56)

Huawei MatePad SE 11 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.35 (3.34-3.37)

Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.22 (4.19-4.23)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)

Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.57 (2.55-2.58)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.49 (3.49-3.49)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

发言人

联想 Tab K11 Plus 的四个兼容杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）的扬声器可产生良好的立体声效果。虽然低音很少，但由于中高音相对线性，声音仍然相当平衡。全音量时，小扬声器会开始轻微振动，但声音不会失真。

3.5 毫米插孔和蓝牙 5.3 可用于连接外部音频设备。平板电脑仅支持极少数蓝牙音频编码，即 SBC、AAC 和 LDAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 约 2 小时充满电

耗电量

联想 Tab K11 Plus 的充电功率可达 20 瓦。随机附带了一个合适的电源适配器，在我们的测试中，它能在 2:14 小时内为平板电脑充满电。电池电量再次达到 80% 需要 1:35 小时。

联想平板电脑的功耗堪称典范。无论是在空闲模式还是在负载情况下，它所需的能量都明显低于同类设备。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.1 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load	4.4 / 9.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab K11 Plus 8600 mAh	Huawei MatePad SE 11 7700 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Teclast P50 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		-34%	-115%	-28%	-99%	-12%	-117%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	1.7 -55%	1 9%	1.5 -36%	0.63 43%	1.036 ?(0.63 - 1.5, n=8) 6%	1.844 ?(0.63 - 6.5, n=65, last 2 years) -68%
Idle Average *	1.3	1.9 -46%	4.76 -266%	1.8 -38%	4.25 -227%	1.898 ?(1.1 - 4.25, n=8) -46%	3.8 ?(1 - 9.2, n=65, last 2 years) -192%
Idle Maximum *	1.6	2.2 -38%	4.79 -199%	2.8 -75%	4.34 -171%	2.24 ?(1.5 - 4.34, n=8) -40%	4.36 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=65, last 2 years) -173%
Load Average *	4.4	5.9 -34%	9.52 -116%	4.3 2%	10.24 -133%	4.75 ?(2.6 - 10.2, n=8) -8%	9.49 ?(2.5 - 44.9, n=65, last 2 years) -116%
Load Maximum *	9.8	9.7 1%	9.92 -1%	9 8%	10.47 -7%	7.19 ?(3.85 - 10.7, n=8) 27%	13.3 ?(3.9 - 54.8, n=65, last 2 years) -36%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.17 (4.35-9.79)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.52 (1.674-7.23)

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.919 (1.383-2.58)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.31)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.74 (1.672-2.5)

运行时间

遗憾的是，低功耗和大电池的组合并没有为联想 Tab K11 Plus 带来较长的电池续航时间。虽然电池续航时间并不差，但还无法与竞争对手相提并论。在模拟网上冲浪和连续循环播放视频的情况下，这款平板电脑的续航时间刚刚超过 12 小时。一天的高强度使用绝对是可能的。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		25h 17min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 07min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 20min

	Lenovo Tab K11 Plus 8600 mAh	Huawei MatePad SE 11 7700 mAh	Lenovo Tab M11 7040 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Teclast P50 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Battery Runtime		22%	22%	20%	28%	61%
Reader / Idle	1517	1992 31%		2275 50%	2745 81%	4236 179%
H.264	727	953 31%		800 10%	810 11%	997 37%
WiFi v1.3	734	931 27%	896 22%	920 25%	728 -1%	1017 39%
Load	260	254 -2%		243 -7%	310 19%	231 -11%

Notebookcheck 总评分

联想 Tab K11 Plus 是一款物美价廉的全能平板电脑，在冲浪和多媒体应用方面与家庭使用一样出色。只可惜它的更新时间太短。

Back to the verdict

Lenovo Tab K11 Plus - 01/23/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

73 / 80 → 91%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

43 / 69 → 62%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 89%

Battery

89%

Display

84%

Games Performance

2 / 65 → 3%

Application Performance

48 / 92 → 52%

AI Performance

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Camera

60 / 90 → 67%

Average

66%

78%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
85.9%

Materials
50%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
95.1%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
25%

Total Sustainability Score: 66%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.