联想 Tab M11 平板电脑评测:11 英寸平板电脑,支持手写笔,适合学校和多媒体使用
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo Tab M11 Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 465 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 11.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 480 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.00" | 1920x1200 | |
80 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Teclast T40 Air T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1 | 464 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 10.36" | 2000x1200 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Huawei MatePad SE SD 680, Adreno 610 | 440 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.40" | 2000x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 金属外壳和大量内存
过去,金属外壳的平板电脑只有在较高的价格区间才会出现,但如今在 200 欧元区间也很常见。我们的联想 Tab M11 测试设备采用灰色金属外壳,背面顶部嵌入了一条相当宽的塑料条,以提高接收效果。摄像头模块也位于此处,凸出且略微发亮。机身边框也是金属材质。
联想 Tab M11 的稳定性非常高,尽管体积很大,但几乎无法扭曲,只有强大的压力才能通过屏幕的液晶。制造商还提供了 IP52 认证,这意味着平板电脑可以防尘防水溅,但不能浸入液体中。
正面的显示屏边缘相当窄,但触摸屏仍然易于握持,不会意外触发。
该机型配备了 128 GB 的大容量存储空间,这个配置还算不错,在未来几个月可能会成为这个价位的标准配置。您只能使用 4GB 内存,而 Teclast T40 Air的内存则更大,灵活性更高。
USB-C 端口仅支持 USB 2.0 标准,因此很难加快数据传输,也不提供图像输出功能。如果你想连接耳机或外置扬声器,可以通过 3.5 毫米插孔实现。虽然没有 NFC 功能,但我们的测试机型上有一个 nano-SIM 卡插槽。不能使用 eSIM 卡。此外,还有仅支持 WiFi 的版本。
在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考存储卡进行的测试中,microSD 读卡器的表现相当不错,在复制测试中平均达到了 34.4 MBit/s。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Tab M11 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Teclast T40 Air (Angelbird V60) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 笔支持和更新承诺
得益于 WiFi 5,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器进行的无线局域网测试中,这款平板电脑的数据传输速率约为 300 - 350 MBit/s。在我们的测试中,传输速率非常稳定,与同等价格的平板电脑相当。该设备并不突出,千兆网络连接也没有得到充分利用。不过,仍然可以实现快速传输。
我们的 4G 机型还可以通过蜂窝网络访问移动互联网。内置调制解调器提供的频率足以在中欧地区运行,但在旅行时,您应该提前检查 Tab M11 是否也能连接到当地的 LTE 网络。
Android 13 仍预装在设备上。 联想将在 2028 年初之前提供安全补丁。无论如何,平板电脑的更新承诺还是相当罕见的,因此对于一款相对廉价的设备来说,这就更加令人高兴了。Android
制造商几乎不会更改谷歌的操作系统,只会预装很少的应用程序。在测试时,安全补丁是从 2024 年 1 月开始的,可以再做一次更新。
DRM L1 是可用的,这样你就可以全高清观看主要供应商提供的流媒体。
触摸屏反应灵敏,在边缘和角落也运行良好。平板电脑支持联想手写笔,可用来手写笔记或绘图。联想的软件支持 OneVision,可通过分屏或浮动窗口实现更好的多任务处理。你还可以启动 PC 模式,通过任务栏对鼠标和键盘控制进行优化。
只有面部识别可以用作生物识别解锁方法。它的工作原理相当可靠,即使在黑暗的地方,屏幕发出的光线通常也足以识别我们。
Networking | |
Lenovo Tab M11 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Teclast T40 Air | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
相机 - 可用图像质量
廉价平板电脑的摄像头一直是个问题,联想的网站也在宣传文件扫描,而不是美丽的度假照片。
背面只有一个 800 万像素的摄像头,但它拍摄的快照还算可以接受。如果事后不将其放大太多,并期望获得大量细节,在白天也能拍出照片。
在弱光环境下,清晰度还有待提高,但亮度尚可。视频可以 1080p 格式录制,最高 30 fps。自动对焦经常可以看到,但有些延迟,曝光调整通常较快。
前置还有一个 800 万像素的自拍摄像头,自拍效果非常不错。细节清晰度和暗部亮度并不突出,但如果你没有太高的期望,你绝对可以使用前置摄像头。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light显示屏 - 90 Hz 面板,色彩强烈但不准确
IPS 屏幕的分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素,比标准的全高清分辨率略高。屏幕亮度可达 441 cd/m²,平均约为 405 cd/m²。这个亮度只够在暮色下的室外使用,但在室内使用已经足够。
屏幕显示的色彩很强烈,但根据我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试,色彩都过于鲜艳明亮。虽然这看起来不错,但如果有人希望达到不错的色彩准确度,例如打印输出,那么稍后的结果就会完全不同,这让他很失望。
即使在低亮度下,我们也没有发现 PWM 闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 431 cd/m²
Contrast: 1078:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.194
Lenovo Tab M11 IPS, 1920x1200, 11" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11" | Teclast T40 Air IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | Huawei MatePad SE IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 18% | 10% | 27% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 70.1 ? | 53.81 ? 23% | 58.4 ? 17% | 44.5 ? 37% |
Response Time Black / White * | 33.9 ? | 29.92 ? 12% | 33.1 ? 2% | 28.6 ? 16% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | -2% | -49% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 431 | 493 14% | 319 -26% | 398 -8% |
Brightness | 405 | 460 14% | 296 -27% | 368 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 85 -3% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.35 12% | 0.44 -10% | 0.46 -15% |
Contrast | 1078 | 1409 31% | 725 -33% | 865 -20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.72 | 6 38% | 10.9 -12% | 2.17 78% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.59 | 11.7 -1% | 19.02 -64% | 4.32 63% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 8.2 -128% | 11.5 -219% | 3.1 14% |
Gamma | 2.194 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.035 108% | 2.214 99% |
CCT | 7348 88% | 9131 71% | 11482 57% | 7245 90% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
2% | -20% /
-38% | 20% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
33.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.3 ms rise | |
↘ 12.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
70.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.9 ms rise | |
↘ 41.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 同时使用四个扬声器
联发科 联发科 Helio G88作为 SoC。它拥有两个主频高达 2 GHz 的 ARM Cortex-A75 性能内核和六个主频高达 1.8 GHz 的 ARM Cortex-A55 节能内核,在性能方面达到了同类产品的水平。三星 三星Galaxy Tab A9+显示了更多的可能性。
联想 Tab M11 偶尔需要一些时间来处理菜单中的动画,系统很少有真正流畅的感觉。在加载大型应用程序时,你必须做好等待时间的准备,特别是因为内存的运行速度相当慢。
我们在 Tab M11 的正面测得的最高温度为 35.5 °C。虽然温度略高,但并不影响使用。由于我们是在室温下进行测试,因此这也为更温暖的环境留出了空间。即使在长时间负载的情况下,SoC 也不会降低其性能。
平板电脑配有四个扬声器,因此在我们的音量测量中达到了 81.4 dB(A)。中低音也能听到,但平板电脑听起来并不饱满有力。不过,你可以通过 3.5 毫米音频插孔和蓝牙连接外部扬声器或耳机,以获得更好的音效。可用的无线音频编解码器很少:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD 和 LDAC 涵盖了最广泛使用的替代技术。
根据我们的无线局域网测试,在平板电脑耗尽电量之前,我们可以不间断地上网近 15 个小时。对于一块 7,040 毫安时的电池来说,这已经是相当不错的续航时间了、 Teclast T40 Air和 三星Galaxy Tab A9+还能多用几分钟。最大充电功率为 15 瓦,平板电脑不附带充电器。
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ | |
Teclast T40 Air | |
Lenovo Tab M11 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (7611 - 13413, n=6) |
Lenovo Tab M11 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ | Teclast T40 Air | Huawei MatePad SE | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 62% | -16% | -36% | -22% | 152% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 294.5 | 485.96 65% | 270.7 -8% | 293.6 0% | 284 ? -4% | 1045 ? 255% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 256.9 | 476.37 85% | 246.2 -4% | 99.5 -61% | 194.6 ? -24% | 686 ? 167% |
Random Read 4KB | 95.6 | 130.67 37% | 76.3 -20% | 61.8 -35% | 82.7 ? -13% | 189.4 ? 98% |
Random Write 4KB | 101.2 | 162.9 61% | 67.8 -33% | 54 -47% | 55.4 ? -45% | 189.9 ? 88% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
发言人
Lenovo Tab M11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MatePad SE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ | |
Teclast T40 Air | |
Lenovo Tab M11 | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 1764, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 相当普通......还是不普通?
联想 Tab M11 是一款毫不张扬、经济实惠的平板电脑,在日常使用中表现出色。一方面,这归功于它美观坚固的金属外壳、屏幕边缘纤薄的现代设计、实用的摄像头和良好的电池续航能力。
作为一项特殊功能,即使Android 13 目前仍安装在平板电脑上,您也能在 2028 年之前获得软件更新。我们曾期待四个扬声器能发出更强劲的声音,而且屏幕更适合在室内使用,而不适合在户外明亮的夏日使用。
联想的 Tab M11 有 WiFi 和 LTE 两种版本,就其 200 欧元左右的价格区间而言,传输速率不错。支持手写笔以及多任务和 PC 模式的额外软件选项是一个很好的补充,也让这款平板电脑看起来可以替代笔记本电脑完成简单的任务。
乍一看,联想 Tab M11 并没有什么特别之处,但其支持手写笔、PC 模式和良好的内存使其在竞争中脱颖而出。
内存更大的替代品是 Teclast T40 Air.性能更强的有 三星Galaxy Tab A9+.
价格和供应情况
联想 Tab M11 可直接从制造商处购买,各种配件包的起价为 135 美元。否则,感兴趣的用户可以通过亚马逊订购该设备。
Lenovo Tab M11
- 05/10/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.