Teclast T40 Air 平板电脑评测--尽管价格不高，但运行时间非常出色

Name: Teclast T40 Air
Brand: Teclast

轻量级长跑运动员

Teclast T40 Air 是一款相对纤薄的 10.36 英寸平板电脑，重量并不大。尽管如此，它的电池容量很大，在我们的测试中运行时间非常出色。在这篇评测中，你可以了解到它的其他优点，以及它是否有任何缺点。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/23/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet

Teclast 有很多型号的平板电脑在销售，尤其是在亚马逊等网上商店。这家中国制造商的产品已经引起了相当大的兴趣，因为它们大多价格相对低廉，而且还能提供足够的电量供日常使用。此外，这些产品通常至少具有一项与众不同的功能，如支持移动数据、大容量存储空间或超强电池。

Teclast T40 Air 是一款中端平板电脑，目前的售价远低于 200 美元。它采用 10.36 英寸显示屏，便于携带，外壳相对纤薄，甚至可以使用 4G 网络。让我们来看看 T40 Air 在测试和日常使用中的表现。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast T40 Air (T Series)

Processor

Unisoc T7255 (T616) 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

8 GB

Display

10.36 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 225 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 200 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gravity, gyroscope, hall

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/28/38/40/41/66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 246 x 156

Battery

7200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18-watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

464 g

Price

240 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Teclast T40 Air T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1	464 g	7.7 mm	10.36"	2000x1200
79.9 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Teclast M50 Pro T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1	435 g	7.9 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81.2 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	477 g	7 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
80 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2	460 g	8.5 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
80.8 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Blackview Tab 13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2	450 g	7.7 mm	10.10"	1920x1200

外壳 - 现代金属

制造商选用了金属外壳，在顶部边缘有一个小塑料插件，以确保更好的移动网络接收。深灰色的外壳质感很好，稳定性也不错--不过，当我们在打开屏幕的情况下扭动平板电脑时，我们注意到了一些图像错误。此外，扭动时还会发出一些细微的吱吱声。

边框相对较薄，但仍能让你舒适地握住平板电脑，而不会意外启动触摸屏。设备重量为 464 克，不算太重，可以长时间握持而不会让手臂过于劳累。

该平板电脑没有任何防尘保护措施，这意味着您最好不要让平板电脑沾染太多水和灰尘。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Teclast T40 Air Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Blackview Tab 13 Teclast M50 Pro DIN A5 ❌

连接性 - Teclast 平板电脑拥有大量存储空间

这款平板电脑拥有 256 GB 的存储空间，在这个价位的平板电脑中非常抢眼，为你提供了足够的空间来存储图片、视频和其他许多东西。8 GB 内存对于这个价位的产品来说也是非常宽裕的。

该设备的 USB-C 端口内部只能以 USB-2.0 的速度连接，导致数据传输速度偏慢，同时无法通过线缆将屏幕内容传输到外部显示器。

它有一个 3.5 毫米音频接口，这意味着你也可以顺利使用模拟耳机。不过，它不支持 NFC，因此无法使用非接触式支付服务等。

如果水平放置平板电脑，SIM 卡和 microSD 卡插槽位于机身右侧。在这里，您可以安装一张 nano SIM 卡，以便使用移动数据或拨打电话。对于后者，如果您不想让路人听到您的谈话，我们建议您使用耳机。

右侧SIM 卡/microSD 卡插槽、扬声器、USB-C 接口、3.5 毫米音频插孔

microSD 读卡器

在我们的测试中，Teclast T40 Air 的 microSD 读卡器在使用 Angelbird V60 作为参考卡时速度相当快。这样就可以轻松扩展平板电脑本已很大的存储空间。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	28.4 MB/s
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	27.6 MB/s -3%
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	25.3 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.3 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.9 MB/s -26%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø41.4 (28.2-50.2)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø26.6 (11.8-45.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.5 (12.9-44.1)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34 (17.4-45.3)

Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø25.9 (16.1-46.4)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.3 (33.2-86.5)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.6 (41.9-85.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.6 (44.2-82)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.3 (43.6-81.3)

Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.8 (38.2-83.5)

软件 - 不安全更新

制造商安装的操作系统非常接近Android 13。它没有安装任何膨胀软件（第三方赞助的应用程序）。在测试时，最新的安全补丁是 2023 年 6 月的，并不是很新。

在询问制造商后，它告诉我们可以更新到新的Android 版本。目前，该公司正在对其所有产品的更新供应情况进行汇总，应该仍会在 2023 年发布。过去，Teclast 平板电脑的新软件版本相当零散，不过，它们似乎总能解决用户报告的任何问题。

它通过了 Widevine 认证，这意味着您还可以观看高清流媒体内容。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 包括移动数据

WiFi 5 是 Teclast T40 Air 所掌握的最快无线局域网标准，传输速率相当稳定（高于同价位卡匣的平均水平）。在靠近路由器的地方，网页加载速度相对较快，而且可以接收到全部信号。在距离路由器 10 米远的地方，中间隔着三堵墙，我们只能接收到 3/4 的信号，有时网页加载需要花费一些时间。

在这个价位的产品中，有一样东西并不总是标准配置（尽管它也不是全新的）：Teclast T40 Air 支持 LTE。它可以使用多种频率，这意味着在仅限于本国大陆的旅行中，至少不会有任何网络连接问题。在我们的测试中，信号质量尚可，但比高端手机稍差。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Blackview Tab 13	332 (306^min - 352^max) MBit/s +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	319 (310^min - 325^max) MBit/s +4%
Teclast M50 Pro	319 (259^min - 336^max) MBit/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	317 (251^min - 326^max) MBit/s +3%
Teclast T40 Air	308 (238^min - 322^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Blackview Tab 13	370 (336^min - 376^max) MBit/s +3%
Teclast M50 Pro	358 (316^min - 374^max) MBit/s 0%
Teclast T40 Air	358 (337^min - 370^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	351 (333^min - 366^max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	218 (172^min - 258^max) MBit/s -39%

Teclast T40 Air; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø308 (238-322)

Teclast T40 Air; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (337-370)

在我们的测试中，定位模块在使用应用程序时工作得并不好--它确实能找到不少卫星，而且几乎能与所有较大的网络一起工作，但是，即使过了 10 分钟，它也没能在户外找到我们。

对于我们的实际测试来说，这并不是最好的条件，在一次自行车旅行中，我们将平板电脑与 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表进行了比较。事实上，Teclast T40 Air 确定的位置总是与我们实际骑行的路线略有偏差。

总之，我们没有发现任何严重的错误，这意味着如果不要求很高的精确度，这款平板电脑绝对可以用于定位。不过，它在应用程序测试中的失误以及在实际测试中的不太精确定位，让我们不敢轻易推荐它作为导航设备使用。

摄像头 - 即使对于平板电脑来说也很糟糕

你不应对 Teclast T40 Air 的摄像头抱有太高期望。许多平板电脑都将其视为省钱的地方--归根结底，这么大的设备不会优先考虑作为拍照设备，而很可能只是用来记录某些情况、扫描文件或扫描二维码。

为此，其配备 LED 闪光灯的 1300 万像素后置摄像头就足够了。另一方面，如果你期待拍出出色的照片，那么平板电脑的模糊照片会让你大失所望，因为它的照片无论在亮部还是暗部都缺乏动感。它的照片还带有浓重的蓝色色调，较大的区域往往颗粒感很强。在我们周围环境的照片中，你看不到太多细节，有些区域甚至非常不清晰。在对比度较高的弱光环境下，暗部仍然是暗的。

视频最高可录制 1080p 和 30 fps。

平板电脑正面配备了一个 800 万像素传感器，即使在光线良好的条件下也能拍摄出相当暗的照片。放大后，只能识别有限的细节，照片显得颗粒感很强。

该照相系统对于拍摄快照来说已经足够好了，但它甚至赶不上中档照相手机。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plant Main camera surroundings Main camera low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在我们的测试实验室中，Teclast T40 Air 的主摄像头甚至难以提供清晰的图像：它的对比度很低，一些区域看起来不干净，总之，照片看起来不是最好的。在只有 1 勒克斯照度的情况下，传感器无法显示任何可见内容。

ColorChecker Teclast T40 Air: 8.23 ∆E min: 1.86 - max: 15.27 ∆E

配件和保修 - 制造商提供 12 个月的保修服务

Teclast 为其所有设备提供 12 个月的保修服务。

如有保修要求，制造商建议联系经销商进行维修处理。

T40 Air 随附一个充电器、一条 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。Teclast 还提供带支架功能的透明保护套，网上售价约为 15 美元。

输入设备和操作 - 基本流畅

这款平板电脑的刷新率不会超过 60 赫兹，这意味着操作起来几乎感觉不到流畅。即便如此，Teclast T40 的反应还是可靠而灵敏的，我们只在运行较高强度的应用程序时才注意到它有些滞后。

顶部边缘的硬件按键很好找，按压点也很清晰。Teclast T40 没有配备指纹传感器，只有 2D 面部识别功能，这虽然不能完全防止人为操作，但仍能可靠地解锁平板电脑。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 看到蓝色了吗？

Teclast T40 Air 的显示屏尺寸为 10.36 英寸，分辨率为 2,000 x 1,2000 像素，采用 IPS 技术。它的最大亮度在同类产品中处于平均水平--我们测得的平均亮度为 296 cd/m²，主要适合在没有强光的室内使用。

在瞥一眼显示屏时，你确实会注意到蓝色色调。在 CalMAN 测试中，我们使用分光光度计证实了这一点。使用 T40 Air 的板载工具（尤其是夜光模式）可以稍稍缓解这种现象。不过，它的色彩描绘并不令人惊叹。


271 cd/m²	289 cd/m²	302 cd/m²
302 cd/m²	319 cd/m²	299 cd/m²
301 cd/m²	295 cd/m²	289 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 319 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 296.3 cd/m² Minimum: 7.71 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 319 cd/m²
Contrast: 725:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.035

	Teclast T40 Air IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Teclast M50 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Blackview Tab 13 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Screen		26%	16%	29%	35%
Brightness middle	319	248 -22%	322 1%	343 8%	344 8%
Brightness	296	234 -21%	303 2%	332 12%	330 11%
Brightness Distribution	85	86 1%	89 5%	94 11%	93 9%
Black Level *	0.44	0.2 55%	0.45 -2%	0.31 30%	0.27 39%
Contrast	725	1240 71%	716 -1%	1106 53%	1274 76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	10.9	5.3 51%	7.02 36%	5.9 46%	5.32 51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	19.02	11.95 37%	10.38 45%	11.2 41%	11.27 41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	11.5	7.1 38%	7.1 38%	7.9 31%	6.2 46%
Gamma	2.035 ^108%	2.327 ^95%	2.179 ^101%	2.184 ^101%	2.106 ^104%
CCT	11482 ^57%	8112 ^80%	8730 ^74%	9198 ^71%	8023 ^81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

即使在最低亮度设置下，我们也没有注意到任何 PWM。

另一方面，它的反应速度非常慢，几乎不可能实现流畅的游戏。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.5 ms rise
33.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 32.4 ms rise
58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在室外，显示屏在阴天时已经很容易反光，而且由于亮度较低，它的清晰度也不高。

即使从极端角度观看，显示内容的颜色也几乎不会发生变化。

性能 - 该价位的正常动力

产品Unisoc T616这是一款通常安装在中端平板电脑和手机上的 SoC，因此非常适合 Teclast T40 Air。该处理器的最高时钟频率可达 2 GHz，在基准测试中的表现与同类设备相差无几。

在日常使用中，只有在运行要求较高的应用程序时才会出现掉帧现象--浏览网页、查看照片或观看电影很少会出现掉帧现象。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	373 Points +7%
Teclast M50 Pro	360 Points +3%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (298 - 380, n=7)	351 Points 0%
Teclast T40 Air	350 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	346 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points +80%
Teclast M50 Pro	1469 Points +6%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1184 - 1502, n=7)	1410 Points +2%
Teclast T40 Air	1387 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	1345 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1267 Points -9%

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)	1111 Points +160%
Teclast M50 Pro	439 Points +3%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (427 - 440, n=4)	434 Points +2%
Teclast T40 Air	427 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)	3544 Points +140%
Teclast M50 Pro	1606 Points +9%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1474 - 1606, n=4)	1556 Points +6%
Teclast T40 Air	1474 Points

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points +106%
Teclast M50 Pro	230647 Points +1%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (228124 - 235075, n=4)	230591 Points +1%
Teclast T40 Air	228517 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	213115 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	199786 Points -13%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points +24%
Teclast M50 Pro	8055 Points +1%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (7936 - 8066, n=6)	8004 Points +1%
Teclast T40 Air	7936 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	7404 Points -7%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points +102%
Teclast M50 Pro	390 Points +2%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (382 - 394, n=4)	388 Points +2%
Teclast T40 Air	382 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	359 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	356 Points -7%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	2550 Points +26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	2283 Points +13%
Teclast M50 Pro	2126 Points +5%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2026 - 2182, n=4)	2095 Points +3%
Teclast T40 Air	2026 Points
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	5507 Points +11%
Teclast M50 Pro	4969 Points 0%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (4795 - 5151, n=4)	4969 Points 0%
Teclast T40 Air	4959 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	4777 Points -4%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points +85%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	3412 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	3178 Points +21%
Teclast M50 Pro	3035 Points +15%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2632 - 3255, n=4)	2941 Points +12%
Teclast T40 Air	2632 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points +706%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	2124 Points +87%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1497 Points +32%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1137 - 1173, n=4)	1151 Points +1%
Teclast M50 Pro	1148 Points +1%
Teclast T40 Air	1137 Points
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +12%
Teclast M50 Pro	1181 Points +4%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1096 - 1181, n=4)	1148 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	1138 Points 0%
Teclast T40 Air	1135 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1114 Points -2%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +2397%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	304 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	302 Points +3%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (292 - 321, n=4)	302 Points +3%
Teclast M50 Pro	297 Points +2%
Teclast T40 Air	292 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points +302%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	4094 Points +45%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2817 - 4209, n=5)	3157 Points +12%
Teclast M50 Pro	2892 Points +3%
Teclast T40 Air	2817 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1662 Points -41%

Legend

Teclast T40 Air Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Teclast M50 Pro Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview Tab 13 Mediatek Helio G85, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Average Unisoc T7255 (T616)

Average of class Tablet

ARM Mali-G57 MP1 GPU 只有一个运算核心，这让这款图形解决方案在玩要求苛刻的游戏时显得力不从心。即使是 3D 基准测试，在 1080p 分辨率下也无法以 30 帧/秒的速度流畅运行，而在 1440p 或 4K 分辨率下，每秒只能运行几帧。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	191 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	185 Points +47%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	132 Points +5%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	127 Points +1%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	126 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	193 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	189 Points +47%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	135 Points +5%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	129 Points
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	128 Points -1%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	757 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	722 Points +52%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	522 Points +10%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	476 Points 0%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	474 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	761 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	721 Points +52%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	524 Points +11%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	477 Points +1%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	474 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1527 Points +40%
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1441 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1146 Points +5%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1106 Points +2%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1089 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1332 Points +44%
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1281 Points +38%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	979 Points +6%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	937 Points +1%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	927 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3124 Points +12%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3001 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2848 Points +2%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2798 Points
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2564 Points -8%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps +65%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31 fps +35%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	23 fps 0%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	23 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +71%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32 fps +33%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps 0%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +60%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps +27%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps +7%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	15 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps +63%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps +25%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps 0%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +51%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +18%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps +4%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.3 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +55%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +24%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps 0%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8.8 fps +57%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps +14%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps +4%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.6 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps +64%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps +12%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.9 fps 0%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.9 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5.9 fps +59%
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5 fps +35%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps +22%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.8 fps +3%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.7 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.7 fps +68%
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps +50%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.7 fps +23%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.2 fps 0%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.2 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 fps +62%
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps +29%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps +28%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6 fps +3%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps +64%
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.4 fps +38%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.8 fps +28%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps 0%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1.6 fps +68%
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +47%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.2 fps +26%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.98 fps +3%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.95 fps

在浏览互联网时，Teclast T40 Air 似乎相当灵活，不过在调用网页时可能需要考虑加载时间。这款笔记本电脑在同类产品中取得了不错的基准测试成绩，但这很可能与它的浏览器版本较新有关。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points +109%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	57.176 Points +7%
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	53.27 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (45.4 - 57.2, n=5)	52 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	49.8 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	46.85 Points -12%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	58 Points 0%
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	58 Points
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	57 Points -2%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (45 - 60, n=4)	55 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	53 Points -9%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	155.2 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	93 Points +16%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	86 Points +8%
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	80 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (68 - 86, n=3)	78 Points -2%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min +201%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	46.6 runs/min +15%
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	40.5 runs/min
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (34.4 - 46.6, n=5)	40.4 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chome 112)	38.16 runs/min -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)	34.43 runs/min -15%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points +102%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	14855 Points +2%
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	14522 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (12141 - 15304, n=5)	14092 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	12681 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	11952 Points -18%
Blackview Tab 13 (Chrome 109)	11712 Points -19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -38%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	3075.1 ms * -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	2895.3 ms * -7%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2531 - 3014, n=4)	2711 ms * -0%
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	2708.7 ms *
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	2530.7 ms * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast T40 Air 的存储容量可能很大，但其 eMMC 闪存肯定不是最快的。不过，在这个价位的产品中，你几乎找不到比它更快的了。

因此，数据传输和加载时间可能需要一点时间。

	Teclast T40 Air	Teclast M50 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	Blackview Tab 13	Average 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		2%	-25%	10%	-7%	-3%	198%
Sequential Read 256KB	270.7	257.8 -5%	249 -8%	277.2 2%	289.1 7%	272 ?(240 - 297, n=5) 0%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 286%
Sequential Write 256KB	246.2	225.22 -9%	83 -66%	210.4 -15%	173.1 -30%	221 ?(149.5 - 253, n=5) -10%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 179%
Random Read 4KB	76.3	91.95 21%	67.3 -12%	105.1 38%	79 4%	81.3 ?(61.7 - 100, n=5) 7%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 148%
Random Write 4KB	67.8	68.13 0%	58.8 -13%	78.5 16%	63.1 -7%	61 ?(9.4 - 92.2, n=5) -10%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 180%

游戏 - 3D 游戏中晃动的 30 fps

在 Teclast T40 Pro 上玩简单的游戏不成问题，大多数游戏都可以从 Google Play 商店下载--作为这款平板电脑的用户，你不会遇到任何限制。

不过，大多数游戏的帧数只能达到 30 帧，即使如此，也不是最流畅的。如果你的期望值不高，或者你只玩 2D 游戏，那么 T40 Air 就足够了。要玩有趣的 3D 游戏，您需要更好的图形处理能力。

我们本想公布详细的帧速率，但该平板电脑拒绝使用GameBench 软件正常工作。.

No graph data

排放 - T40 Air 几乎不发热

温度

长时间使用后，平板电脑正面的温度最高可升至 33.9 °C，但这只是稍微明显。这意味着即使在炎热的天气和运行要求较高的应用程序时，手持平板电脑也不会有任何问题。

3DMark 压力测试也证明了这一点：当平板电脑长时间执行要求苛刻的任务时，处理器不会出现节流现象。性能最多会有轻微波动，但总能恢复到起始水平。

Max. Load

Idle


30.4 °C	33.9 °C	28.4 °C
30.2 °C	29.1 °C	27.6 °C
29.4 °C	27.8 °C	26.7 °C

Maximum: 33.9 °C
Average: 29.3 °C


28.4 °C	32.6 °C	30.4 °C
28 °C	29.9 °C	29.5 °C
26.8 °C	28.5 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 32.6 °C
Average: 29.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.6 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.85 (2.84-2.86)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.86-2.87)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.35 (4.34-4.36)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.775 (0.732-0.818)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.783 (0.733-0.822)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.117 (1.11-1.127)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	98.5 (1.11^min - 1.127^max) % +10%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	97.5 (0.789^min - 0.809^max) % +9%
Teclast T40 Air	89.6 (0.732^min - 0.818^max) %
Teclast M50 Pro	89.2 (0.733^min - 0.822^max) % 0%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Teclast M50 Pro	99.6 (2.86^min - 2.87^max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	99.4 (4.34^min - 4.36^max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	99.3 (3.13^min - 3.16^max) % 0%
Teclast T40 Air	99.1 (2.84^min - 2.86^max) %

Legend

Teclast T40 Air Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Teclast M50 Pro Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview Tab 13 Mediatek Helio G85, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

发言人

Teclast 平板电脑侧面的扬声器能产生不错的音效，即使在最高音量下也不会出现高音过重的情况。当然，平板电脑无法与真正的高保真音响系统相媲美，但听音乐或播放电影原声效果还是不错的。

还可以通过 3.5 毫米音频插孔或蓝牙连接外置扬声器或耳机。连接没有任何问题，无线播放所需的音频编解码器也一应俱全，包括 AAC、SBC、aptX、aptX HD 和 LDAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast T40 Air audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Blackview Tab 13 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 大电池带来长运行时间

耗电量

总体而言，Teclast T40 Air 执行任务所需的功率相对较低，与同类产品相比尤其如此。满载时的最大耗电量为 8.4 瓦。

该平板电脑的最大充电功率为 18 瓦。由于其电池非常强大，只需 2 个多小时就能将空电池充满。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.3 / 1.5 Watt
Load	5.6 / 8.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Teclast T40 Air 7200 mAh	Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh
Power Consumption		-4%	-10%	-46%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	1.1 8%	1.4 -17%	1.9 -58%
Idle Average *	1.3	1.4 -8%	1.6 -23%	2.1 -62%
Idle Maximum *	1.5	1.9 -27%	2 -33%	2.5 -67%
Load Average *	5.6	5.5 2%	4.2 25%	7.6 -36%
Load Maximum *	8.4	8 5%	8.7 -4%	9 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T40 Air: Ø8.44 (5.61-11)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T40 Air; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.79 (6.51-7.29)

Teclast T40 Air; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.264 (1.177-1.353)

运行时间

它的电池容量为 7,200 毫安时，因此明显优于大多数同类设备。因此，难怪 Teclast T40 Air 的续航时间也很长：在我们的 WLAN 测试中，它的续航时间达到了 15:18 小时，在正常使用的情况下，这应该能让你轻松地度过一天。

如果您喜欢玩大量游戏，电池最早也要在 4:22 小时后才会耗尽。这意味着，即使玩更长时间的游戏也不成问题。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		46h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 22min

	Teclast T40 Air 7200 mAh	Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Blackview Tab 13 7280 mAh
Battery Runtime		-34%	-4%	-14%	1%
Reader / Idle	2805	1660 -41%	2869 2%	1952 -30%
H.264	1020	579 -43%	942 -8%	1002 -2%
WiFi v1.3	918	555 -40%	874 -5%	861 -6%	926 1%
Load	262	233 -11%	250 -5%	213 -19%

Pros

+ 良好的耐力

+ 大量存储空间和内存

+ 超薄金属外壳

+ 快速 microSD 插槽

+ 可使用移动数据

+ Android 13

+ 无 PWM

+ 不错的扬声器

Cons

- 定位服务不准确

- 摄像头系统非常弱

- 显示屏有强烈的蓝色调

- 屏幕太暗，无法在户外使用

- 更新不安全

结论：连接能力强，但也有不足之处

当然，Teclast T40 Air 也有不少值得批评的地方：例如，它的屏幕有很强的蓝色调、平板电脑的定位服务不准确以及摄像头非常弱等等。

与此同时，该设备也拥有许多积极的特性：它有大量的存储空间和内存，可以使用移动数据，有一个 microSD 插槽，对于模拟耳机爱好者来说，它甚至还有一个 3.5 毫米音频接口。

此外，T40 Air 的大容量电池带来了非常好的续航时间，而且不会让人感觉太重或太笨重。

由于这款平板电脑经常打折，而且屏幕暗淡、定位能力差，如果你打算在室内使用这款平板电脑的话，应该不会有太大问题，因此 Teclast T40 Air 还是值得考虑的。

Teclast T40 Air 的续航能力、移动数据支持和丰富的存储空间给人留下了深刻印象。不过，如果您正在寻找一款适合户外使用的明亮显示屏，那么您可能需要另寻他处了。

我们有几款可供选择的产品供您参考：这款Teclast M50 PrTeclast M50 Pr 的便携性更好，重量也更轻，但电池续航时间却不尽如人意。三星的Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022性能更好，但存储空间有限。

价格和供应情况

Teclast T40 Air 目前在亚马逊上的促销价为 151.99 美元。

Teclast T40 Air - 11/22/2023 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

79 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

46 / 70 → 66%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 91%

Battery

91%

Display

76%

Games Performance

11 / 78 → 14%

Application Performance

60 / 92 → 65%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

70 / 91 → 77%

Camera

45 / 85 → 53%

Average

70%

80%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.