联想 Tab M8（第 4 代）2024 评测--电池寿命超长的迷你平板电脑

Name: Lenovo Tab M8 2024
Brand: Lenovo

虽小，却令人印象深刻。

联想 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 是一款适合成人和儿童使用的便捷多媒体平板电脑，在我们的评测中，它出色的电池续航能力给我们留下了深刻印象。请继续阅读我们的评测，看看这款售价 119 美元的 8 英寸平板电脑最适合哪些人使用。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/26/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

屏幕对角线约为 8 英寸的小型平板电脑轻巧便携，非常适合移动使用，既能上网冲浪，又能观看视频。它们也非常适合儿童使用。小尺寸平板电脑的价格通常比较经济实惠。

联想 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 将为您拉开帷幕：这款 8 英寸平板电脑的零售价为 119 美元，由于其功能包括谷歌儿童空间，因此可以推荐给家庭使用，如果手头没有更好的替代品，TB301XU LTE 版甚至可以取代智能手机。我们对 TB301FU Wi-Fi 版进行了评测，并展示了与前代产品 TB301FU 相比有哪些改进。 Tab M8（第 4 代）2023.

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 (Tab M Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT8768 8 x 1.5 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

PowerVR GE8320

Memory

4 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

8.00 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, capacitive, ADS, 350 nits, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 49 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3,5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Ambient light sensor, accelerometer, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.95 x 197.97 x 119.82

Battery

0 Wh, 5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 5 MPix auto focus
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix fixed focus

Additional features

Speakers: dual speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger USB-C cable, SIM tool, clear case, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

320 g, Power Supply: 41 g

Price

129 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Lenovo Tab M8 2024 Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320	320 g	8.95 mm	8.00"	1280x800
80.4 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2023	Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2	337 g	9.7 mm	8.00"	1280x800
79.5 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300	320 g	9 mm	8.00"	1280x800
82.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Nokia T10 T606, Mali-G57 MP1	375 g	9 mm	8.00"	1280x800
84.1 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	332 g	8 mm	8.70"	1340x800

外壳 - 轻巧方便

联想 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 与 Tab M8（Gen 4）2023 的情况完全相同。 Tab M8（第四代）2023.新版本还采用了塑料材质，重量仅为 320 克。这意味着它的重量低于同类平板电脑，如诺基亚 T10或三星Galaxy Tab A9.

联想平板电脑的背面有三分之二覆盖着时尚的三角形图案，给人一种防滑的感觉。后盖顶部三分之一的表面非常光滑，除了联想徽标外，这里还装有 500 万像素的主摄像头。总的来说，这款平板电脑的外观和手感给人留下了深刻印象，而且只能进行最小程度的扭曲。

联想为 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 提供深渊蓝和北极灰两种颜色。不过，在我们进行评测时，欧盟地区只提供灰色。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Nokia T10 Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Lenovo Tab M8 2024 DIN A5 ❌

功能 - 还可选配 LTE

Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 有多种规格可供选择。在中欧地区，联想官方只提供 TB301FU Wi-Fi 版平板电脑，配备 4GB 内存和 64GB eMMC 存储空间，起价为 129 欧元（约合 119 美元）。联想商店还有一款 4/64 GB 版本，配有坚固的保险杠，特别适合儿童使用，售价为 158 欧元（约合 139 美元）。

寻找 TB301XU LTE 版本的人仍然可以很快找到。这款平板电脑配备了 4G 模块，在本地网店的售价与 Wi-Fi 版一样便宜，但只有 3 GB 内存和 32 GB 大容量存储空间。联想在其产品数据库中列出了一个额外的 4/64 GB 存储选项，但在测试时，商店里还看不到它的踪影。现在，在商店里时不时可以找到 2/32GB 和 3/32GB 的 W-Fi 版本，它们甚至比我们的评测版本还要便宜一些。

USB-C 端口的工作速度为 USB 2.0，兼容 OTG。这意味着平板电脑还可以连接外部存储介质，并使用鼠标或键盘等外围设备。同样，平板电脑还配备了一个 3.5 毫米音频接口。与前代产品一样，NFC 并不在提供的功能之列。

microSD 读卡器

在我们刚安装的 Wi-Fi 评测版本中，64 GB 的存储空间中仍有 49 GB 是可用的。如果你需要更大的存储空间，这款平板电脑可以使用最大容量为 128 GB 的 microSD 卡。尽管如此，该卡不能格式化为内部存储空间，这意味着它只能存储媒体数据，而不能存储应用程序。

在使用我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考存储卡进行的测试中，联想平板电脑的写入和读取性能达到了此类设备的预期。但是三星Galaxy Tab A9显示，在复制数据时，甚至可以达到更高的传输速度。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	48.7 MB/s +70%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	29.6 MB/s +3%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	28.6 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.3 MB/s -8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.6 MB/s -28%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.3 (23.3-49.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.8 (29.5-49.9)

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø69 (21.1-76.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.3 (41.4-80.6)

软件 - 用于高清流媒体的 PureAndroid 13 和 Widevine L1

联想 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 运行的是几乎纯净的Android 13 版本。制造商仅添加了内部支持工具 "联想 Vantage"。谷歌儿童空间应用程序也随之出现，此外，家长还可以为孩子设置一个儿童友好和安全的应用程序和游戏环境。与前代产品不同的是，Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 支持 DRM Widevine L1，这也使它可以播放高清质量的流媒体内容。

联想希望在 2026 年第一季度之前为其平板电脑提供安全更新。我们在二月中旬进行评测时，它运行的是TB301FU_S000092_240116_ROW 操作系统版本。因此，从 1 月 5 日开始的Android 安全更新仍然是相对最新的。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 稳定的 WiFi 5 和精确的 GPS

Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 的每个规格版本都配备了 WiFi 5。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 连接后，它的 Wi-Fi 传输速度达到了同类产品的最高水平，峰值为 370 MBit/s，并且在发送和接收方向都很稳定。同样，该平板电脑还支持蓝牙 5.0。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	368 (359^min - 369^max) MBit/s +8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	349 (337^min - 355^max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	342 (322^min - 350^max) MBit/s
Nokia T10	304 (279^min - 315^max) MBit/s -11%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	301 (281^min - 315^max) MBit/s -12%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	374 (360^min - 392^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	372 (189^min - 388^max) MBit/s +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	370 (350^min - 390^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	367 (347^min - 379^max) MBit/s -1%
Nokia T10	357 (333^min - 367^max) MBit/s -4%

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (322-350)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (359-369)

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø370 (350-390)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø366 (189-388)

为了确定自己的位置，Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 使用卫星导航服务 GPS、Glonass、Galileo、Beidou 和 SBAS。在室内，它能快速、准确地确定我们的位置，最远可达 3 米；在室外，最远可达 1 米。

我们的实际测试表明，Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 非常适合用作导航设备。在一次小型自行车旅行中，它几乎与我们的配套对比设备 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表一样精确地确定了我们的位置。

相机 - 可用的全天候镜头

Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 的主摄像头可拍摄 500 万像素的照片并使用自动对焦，而 200 万像素的自拍摄像头则使用固定对焦。与 Tab M8（第四代）2023相比，这意味着没有任何变化。

500 万像素镜头是一个 "全天候摄像头"，因为它根本无法处理光线不足的情况。相比之下，在日光下，它能很好地完成任务，拍摄出对比度良好、色彩自然的图像。不过，图像清晰度不是特别高，在暗处，图像细节会迅速恶化。主摄像头能以最高 1080p 的分辨率拍摄 30fps 的视频，质量也差不多。

200 万像素前置摄像头拍摄的自拍照颗粒感相对较强，色彩显得比较暗淡。该摄像头最大可拍摄 720p 30fps 的视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight image 1 Daylight image 2 Lowlight image

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在全棚照明下，主摄像头可以相当准确地再现色彩（最大 Delta E 为 11.7）。但是，拍摄到的测试图图像却模糊不清。在 1 勒克斯的弱光下，ColorChecker 色卡和测试图几乎完全消失在黑暗中。

配件和保修 - 可延长至 3 年

Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 随附一个 10 瓦充电器（5V/2A）、一条 USB 数据线（A 型至 C 型）、一个 SIM 卡工具和一份快速指南。包装中还包括一个带脚架的实用透明保护套。

在欧盟，联想为其平板电脑提供 24 个月的保修服务。如需额外收费，保修期可延长至 3 年。

输入设备和操作 - 无法进行生物识别登录

联想平板电脑的 60 Hz 触摸屏在识别输入时不会出现任何明显的延迟。不过，当运行多个要求较高的应用程序或《源氏冲击》等游戏时，情况可能会变得迟缓。在我们的测试中，尝试在应用程序之间切换或返回主屏幕时，往往需要重复输入，直到平板电脑最终做出反应。如果仅限于上网、观看视频或玩简单的游戏，一切都能顺利运行。

由于平板电脑不仅没有指纹传感器，还无法通过生物识别技术解锁。前置摄像头也不提供人脸识别功能。用户只能通过图案、PIN 码或密码进行身份验证。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的明亮 ADS 面板

与前代产品相同，联想平板电脑的显示屏分辨率为 1280 x 800 像素。唯一变化的是屏幕类型。Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 使用的不是 IPS 面板，而是 ADS 面板，同样也只是 IPS 的一种。

在纯白背景下，ADS 面板的平均亮度为 361 cd/m²（最高 411 cd/m²），在同类产品中表现出色。在图像明暗区域分布均匀的情况下（APL18 测量），亮度最高可达 420 cd/m²。

我们没有发现任何与显示器有关的 PWM 闪烁。


350 cd/m²	371 cd/m²	348 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	411 cd/m²	352 cd/m²
342 cd/m²	359 cd/m²	332 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 411 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 360.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 411 cd/m²
Contrast: 1142:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.586

	Lenovo Tab M8 2024 ADS, 1280x800, 8"	Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 LCD, 1280x800, 8"	Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) IPS, 1280x800, 8"	Nokia T10 IPS, 1280x800, 8"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7"
Screen		8%	25%	-9%	7%
Brightness middle	411	388 -6%	410 0%	446 9%	486 18%
Brightness	361	364 1%	380 5%	429 19%	462 28%
Brightness Distribution	81	90 11%	86 6%	94 16%	92 14%
Black Level *	0.36	0.36 -0%	0.16 56%	0.65 -81%	0.35 3%
Contrast	1142	1078 -6%	2563 124%	686 -40%	1389 22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.96	4.38 -11%	4.6 -16%	4.87 -23%	6.2 -57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.68	10.7 32%	9.03 42%	9.85 37%	10.4 34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.2	2.9 44%	6.3 -21%	5.7 -10%	5.7 -10%
Gamma	2.586 ^85%	2.232 ^99%	2.519 ^87%	2.189 ^101%	2.12 ^104%
CCT	7369 ^88%	6221 ^104%	7707 ^84%	7781 ^84%	7911 ^82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

如果将所有显示参数设置为 "标准"，ADS 面板就能提供稳定的图像质量。色彩显示有点过冷。不过，如果需要，可以在显示设置中通过色盘或标准、暖色和冷色三种预设值调节色温。此外，您还可以从 "标准 "模式切换到 "明亮"模式，在明亮模式下显示的色彩对比度更高。

与 Tab M8 (Gen 4) 2023对比度更差。以前的对比度为 2500:1，而我们的评测设备只有 1142:1。对于 ADS/IPS 面板来说，这个分数仍然足以确保鲜艳的色彩再现。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
35.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.2 ms rise
35.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 29.8 ms rise
51.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在户外使用时，这款平板电脑并没有给我们留下深刻印象。由于其照明储备较低，当天空阴沉时，ADS 面板已经难以清晰显示内容。但在室内，显示屏的亮度足以保证稳定的视角。

性能 - 尽管采用了新的 SoC，但功耗并不高

在 2024 版中，Lenovos 8 英寸平板电脑的性能更佳，因为它不再使用联发科 MT6761 芯片。联发科MT6761换成了联发科 MT8768.不过，由于 MT8768 并没有把平板电脑变成火箭，因此我们面对的并不是性能上的飞跃。

与同类廉价平板电脑相比，Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 只能排在中下游。在合成基准测试中，它被前代产品击败，落后于诺基亚 T10尤其是速度更快的三星Galaxy Tab A9.总体而言，该平板电脑的速度与亚马逊 Fire HD 2022.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1890, n=71, last 2 years)	704 Points +293%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	565 Points +216%
Nokia T10	310 Points +73%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	179 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (135 - 179, n=4)	156 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	140 Points -22%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	Points -100%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2450 Points +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	1981 Points +98%
Nokia T10	1256 Points +25%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	1003 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (498 - 1003, n=4)	775 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	488 Points -51%

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=65, last 2 years)	1056 Points +471%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	738 Points +299%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	185 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 ()	185 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=65, last 2 years)	3391 Points +300%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	2065 Points +144%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	848 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 ()	848 Points 0%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=51, last 2 years)	479711 Points +261%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	229468 Points +73%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	135453 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	132881 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 ()	132881 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	92766 Points -30%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=33, last 2 years)	692347 Points +307%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	383511 Points +126%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	170016 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 ()	170016 Points 0%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=71, last 2 years)	9556 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	9083 Points +55%
Nokia T10	6916 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	5866 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (4564 - 5866, n=2)	5215 Points -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	5028 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	4766 Points -19%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	762 Points +228%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	573 Points +147%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	232 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 ()	232 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	198 Points -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 9147, n=57, last 2 years)	3887 Points +218%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	3120 Points +155%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1185 - 1269, n=3)	1226 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	1224 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	979 Points -20%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	444 Points -64%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=57, last 2 years)	6898 Points +160%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	6776 Points +155%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	2793 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	2653 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (2564 - 2653, n=3)	2605 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	1641 Points -38%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=57, last 2 years)	4599 Points +340%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	4152 Points +297%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	1236 Points +18%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1046 - 1365, n=3)	1167 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	1154 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	1046 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=57, last 2 years)	7340 Points +624%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	2683 Points +165%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	1182 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	1014 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (871 - 1014, n=3)	928 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	580 Points -43%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	1273 Points +59%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=57, last 2 years)	1237 Points +55%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	836 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	799 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (762 - 810, n=3)	790 Points -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	10 Points -99%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=49, last 2 years)	5184 Points +3288%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	982 Points +542%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	153 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 ()	153 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	84 Points -45%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=55, last 2 years)	8992 Points +246%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	6453 Points +148%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	3028 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024	2597 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 ()	2597 Points 0%

Legend

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 MediaTek MT8169A, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia T10 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Average Mediatek MT8768

Average of class Tablet

再一次，在图形基准测试中，Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 不仅输给了诺基亚 T10和三星Galaxy Tab A9和亚马逊 Fire HD 2022.正如 T-Rex GFXBench 基准测试所示，即使在低图形设置下，游戏也不会流畅运行，但仍能达到 30fps 的帧率。

3DMark: 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2543 Points +360%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	976 Points +76%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	883 Points +60%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	553 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3908 Points +724%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	826 Points +74%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	784 Points +65%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	474 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3102 Points +133%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2676 Points +101%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1863 Points +40%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1332 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps +90%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +32%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps -32%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps +186%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	29 fps +32%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +263%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	29 fps +81%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps -19%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps +233%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps +33%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7.3 fps -39%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	50 fps +285%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +62%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps -23%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +201%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps +18%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5 fps -40%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps +440%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +120%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4.1 fps -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +400%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.8 fps +27%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps -27%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +246%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7.1 fps +37%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps +27%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.1 fps -40%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.6 fps +273%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4.1 fps +173%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2 fps +33%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.5 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	0.9 fps -40%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps +217%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +46%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +34%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.2 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5 fps -39%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps +233%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7.7 fps +83%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps +31%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.2 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2.5 fps -40%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.4 fps +275%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	0.84 fps +31%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	0.64 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	0.4 fps -37%

联想平板电脑可以快速滚动浏览网站，但有时需要相当长的时间才能完成加载。因此，浏览器的基准测试成绩只能确保中游水平。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	107.9 Points +363%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	71.728 Points +208%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)	23.534 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 (Chrome 121.0.6167.178)	23.323 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)	20.317 Points -13%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (14 - 23.3, n=3)	18.1 Points -22%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	102.6 Points +242%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	81 Points +170%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 (Chrome 121.0.6167.178)	30 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 ()	30 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)	25 Points -17%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)	24 Points -20%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=47, last 2 years)	152.6 Points +291%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	112 Points +187%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)	39 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 (Chrome 121.0.6167.178)	39 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)	34 Points -13%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (24 - 39, n=4)	31.8 Points -18%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	114.9 runs/min +564%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	61.2 runs/min +254%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 (Chrome 121.0.6167.178)	17.3 runs/min
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)	15.76 runs/min -9%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (13.3 - 17.3, n=2)	15.3 runs/min -12%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chome 112)	14.71 runs/min -15%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28263 Points +350%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	22187 Points +253%
Nokia T10 (Chrome 109)	9871 Points +57%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 (Chrome 121.0.6167.178)	6281 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)	5843 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)	5041 Points -20%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (4070 - 6281, n=3)	4855 Points -23%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek MT8768 (10163 - 12342, n=4)	11131 ms * -10%
Lenovo Tab M8 2024 (Chrome 121.0.6167.178)	10163.3 ms *
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)	9435.4 ms * +7%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)	9310.1 ms * +8%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3807 ms * +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	1922.1 ms * +81%

* ... smaller is better

由于 eMMC 存储速度较慢，Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 既不能快速加载，也不能快速传输数据。除了三星Galaxy Tab A9和部分诺基亚 T10之外，竞争对手的表现也不尽如人意。

	Lenovo Tab M8 2024	Amazon Fire HD 8 2022	Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)	Nokia T10	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-24%	1%	60%	252%	6%	345%
Sequential Read 256KB	282.52	270.37 -4%	269.6 -5%	273.5 -3%	916.45 224%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -3%	957 ?(163 - 3466, n=72, last 2 years) 239%
Sequential Write 256KB	204.02	113.44 -44%	190.5 -7%	191.5 -6%	398.32 95%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -14%	646 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=72, last 2 years) 217%
Random Read 4KB	64.31	39.46 -39%	67 4%	71.4 11%	182.74 184%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -8%	185.8 ?(18.4 - 451, n=72, last 2 years) 189%
Random Write 4KB	21.3	19.81 -7%	23.9 12%	71.5 236%	128.92 505%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) 50%	178.1 ?(8.23 - 511, n=72, last 2 years) 736%

游戏 - 这款平板电脑上的游戏并不有趣

我们选择了少量游戏，分析了当前所有游戏在 Tab M8（第 4 代）2024 上的运行情况。结果是坏多于好。

PUBG Mobile》最多只能在第二低的 "平衡"图形模式下运行，即便如此，它也很难达到 30fps 的游戏帧率限制。在 "流畅"图形模式下，帧数也会出现明显的规律性下降。在平板电脑的最低细节设置下，《源氏冲击》并没有改善幻灯片的效果，平均帧数仅为 15fps。

我们使用Gamebench 测试工具记录了游戏帧率。测试工具记录了游戏帧数。

Lenovo Tab M8 2024; Genshin Impact; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø14.8 (10-23)

Lenovo Tab M8 2024; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.0.0: Ø24.6 (18-26)

Lenovo Tab M8 2024; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 3.0.0: Ø23.9 (18-26)

排放 - Tab M8（第 4 代）2024 配备立体声扬声器

温度

即使在负载情况下，Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 仍能保持低温，在通过苛刻的 Burnout 基准进行一小时压力测试后，最高温度仅为 38.2 °C。SoC 与 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试不兼容，因此我们转而使用 GFXBench。通过这项测试，该平板电脑显示出在长时间负载下也能保持稳定的性能。

Max. Load

Idle


31.3 °C	26.2 °C	25.2 °C
35.3 °C	26.3 °C	26 °C
33.7 °C	27.1 °C	25.3 °C

Maximum: 35.3 °C
Average: 28.5 °C


26.3 °C	29.6 °C	34.5 °C
27.6 °C	30 °C	38.2 °C
25.9 °C	30 °C	34.7 °C

Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 30.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.9 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.6 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

这款小型联想平板电脑的两侧均配有立体声扬声器。这些扬声器听起来有点刺耳，几乎没有低音，但对于这个价位的设备来说，它们仍能营造出不错的音场。

外接音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米音频插孔或蓝牙 5.0 与平板电脑连接。支持的蓝牙编解码器有 AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC 和 SBC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 5,100 mAh 电池，具备续航跑者的特质

耗电量

通过附带的 USB 充电器，联想 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 的充电功率可达 10 瓦。在测试中，一个完整的充电周期大约需要 3 个小时。

在功耗方面，这款平板电脑完胜同类产品。该平板电脑空闲时的平均耗电量仅为 1 瓦，负载时为 2.5 瓦，运行非常节能，成功击败了非常经济的亚马逊 Fire HD 8 2022.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.7 / 1 / 1.3 Watt
Load	2.5 / 4.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab M8 2024 5100 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 4850 mAh	Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) 5100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 5100 mAh
Power Consumption		-27%	-65%	-120%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	1.2 -71%	1.7 -143%	0.7 -0%
Idle Average *	1	1.4 -40%	1.9 -90%	2.94 -194%
Idle Maximum *	1.3	1.7 -31%	2.4 -85%	3.03 -133%
Load Average *	2.5	2.5 -0%	3 -20%	7.49 -200%
Load Maximum *	4.6	4.3 7%	3.9 15%	8.02 -74%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 Mediatek MT8768: Ø2.11 (0.697-4.44)

Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761: Ø3.55 (2.98-3.72)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99: Ø3.04 (1.429-4.98)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 Mediatek MT8768; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.06 (1.611-2.49)

Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.33 (3.09-3.68)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.65-3.09)

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 Mediatek MT8768; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.753 (0.655-1.077)

Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2 (1.949-2.38)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.459 (1.412-1.55)

电池寿命

Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 的模拟上网时间为 19 小时，连续循环播放高清视频的时间为 19 小时 23 分钟，电池续航能力非常出色。即使在满负荷状态下，这款平板电脑也不会退缩，可以持续使用 6 小时以上。与其他廉价平板电脑相比，电池续航时间也优于平均水平。

总之，在测试中，联想显示出自己是一个马拉松选手，在需要充电之前，它有足够的耐力在平均负荷下连续使用几天。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		48h 08min
WiFi Websurfing		19h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 06min

	Lenovo Tab M8 2024 5100 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 4850 mAh	Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) 5100 mAh	Nokia T10 5250 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 5100 mAh
Battery Runtime		-18%	-23%	-14%	-21%
Reader / Idle	2888		2223 -23%		1931 -33%
H.264	1163		998 -14%		1158 0%
WiFi v1.3	1140	935 -18%	929 -19%	984 -14%	857 -25%
Load	366		229 -37%		274 -25%

Pros

+ 轻便小巧

+ 无 PWM 的明亮显示屏

+ DRM Widevine L1

+ 出色的电池续航能力

+ 纯Android 13

+ 散热低

+ 定位非常准确

+ 立体声扬声器

+ 可选的 LTE

Cons

- 低水平性能

- 无生物识别解锁

- 只有 60 赫兹

- 不适合游戏

- 充电速度慢

结论 - 联想 Tab M8（第 4 代）2024

联想 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 是一款经济实惠的冲浪和多媒体平板电脑，由于其外形和仅 320 克的重量，它甚至非常适合儿童使用。

立体声扬声器、精确的 GPS、精简且无臃肿软件的Android 13、明亮的显示屏和可选的 LTE 都是这款小型平板电脑的优势所在。但毫无疑问，电池续航时间才是最大的亮点。虽然 Tab M8（第 4 代）20232024 的续航时间有了明显改善，尽管电池容量仍为 5,100 毫安时，但比许多同类廉价平板电脑要好得多。

联想 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 是一款价格合理的平板电脑，具有包括可选 LTE 在内的良好功能集，但在性能方面并不突出。

在 DRM Widevine L1 支持的帮助下，联想 Tab M8 还可以播放高清质量的网络流媒体，这一点与前代产品不同。因此，这款平板电脑能提供娱乐功能，但其他功能并不多，因为它的联发科 SoC MT8768对于要求苛刻的任务来说速度太慢。游戏运行受到很大限制，同时打开多个应用程序时，速度会变得很慢。

联想 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 的替代产品包括诺基亚 T10和三星Galaxy Tab A9.这两款设备的价格都很便宜，但性能要强得多。

价格和供应情况

联想 Tab M8（Gen 4）2024 的 2 GB/32 GB Wi-Fi 版在联想在线商店的售价为 84.99 美元。此外，同样规格的平板电脑目前在亚马逊上的售价为 84.99 美元。

Lenovo Tab M8 2024 - 2024-02-22 02/22/2024 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

64 / 80 → 79%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

37 / 70 → 53%

Weight

86 / 40-88 → 96%

Battery

92%

Display

79%

Games Performance

6 / 78 → 7%

Application Performance

48 / 92 → 52%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

67 / 91 → 73%

Camera

43 / 85 → 50%

Average

68%

80%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 112 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 452583 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 Tab M8（第 4 代）2024 评测--电池寿命超长的迷你平板电脑

Manuel Masiero, 2024-02-26 (Update: 2024-08-15)