联想Tab P11 2022（第二代）平板电脑评测--在性能和配件方面很强大

Name: Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Brand: Lenovo

在中档次还是高档次？

联想中档平板电脑的最新版本再次包括对扩展坞和输入笔的支持。虽然更现代的软件和快速的显示屏应该为多媒体平板电脑插上翅膀，但不幸的是，我们在测试中发现的不仅是改进...

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/28/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet

现在事情开始变得有点混乱了：虽然联想Tab P11仍然可以买到，但你也可以买到带有或不带LTE的 P11 Plus, aP11 Pro，或一个 P11 5G.

而现在，联想也为其中端平板电脑增加了一个新版本：第二代联想Tab P11（WiFi版的标签为TB350FU，LTE版的标签为TB350XU）配备了新的SoC，但其他方面只代表了相当温和的升级。

许多制造商，如Oppo或Honor ，最近推出了新的中档平板电脑，这也意味着Tab P11第二代不再是没有竞争对手。因此，让我们来看看，看看它是否仍然能够在测试中说服我们。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Tab P Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

4 GB

Display

11.50 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 203 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 108 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSDXC (up to 1TB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity, acceleration, hall

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.4 x 269 x 169

Battery

7500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 20 Watt charging

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.4, AF, flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0

Additional features

Speakers: 4 speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, docking connector (Pogo Pin), pen support (Lenovo Precision Pen 2) , fanless

Weight

520 g

Price

399 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	520 g	7.4 mm	11.50"	2000x1200
82.1 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2021	Lenovo Tab P11 SD 662, Adreno 610	490 g	7.5 mm	11.00"	2000x1200
83.1 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2023	Oppo Pad Air SD 680, Adreno 610	440 g	6.9 mm	10.36"	2000x1200
81.7 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Honor Pad 8 SD 680, Adreno 610	520 g	6.9 mm	12.00"	2000x1200
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad 10 A14, A14 Bionic GPU	477 g	7 mm	10.90"	2360x1640

外壳 - 重金属外壳

我们已经从目前许多其他联想平板电脑的外壳设计中知道了。它是一个灰色的金属外壳，但顶部的部分是由塑料制成的，表面有橡胶，可以更好地接收。第二代的联想Tab P11提供了比前代稍大的显示屏，使其整体上略长、略宽，也重了30克（约1盎司）。虽然与其他平板电脑相比，它也不算轻，但拿在手里感觉很舒服。

做工很有吸引力，材料过渡流畅，边缘干净。联想可以改进稳定性，因为这款平板电脑可以明显翘起，也会产生一些吱吱作响的声音。

有了大猩猩玻璃3，显示屏得到了相当好的保护，不会摔坏。屏幕上的压力只有在使用一些力量时才会达到液晶。

尺寸比较

设备 - 快速存储

4GB内存和128GB UFS 2.2闪存用于数据存储，我们的测试装置的设备处于同级水平。这款平板电脑可以配备更多的工作内存，也有4G版本。尽管这款平板电脑的官方价格至少为399欧元（约合441美元），但它甚至已经可以从联想那里获得回扣，而且在一些互联网供应商那里又明显更实惠。

不幸的是，我们正在寻找NFC，但没有结果。相反，我们在底部发现了一些Pogo PIN，可以用来连接一个扩展坞。USB-C端口在内部只按照较慢的USB-2.0标准连接。

微型SD卡读卡器

我们使用Angelbird V60 microSD卡作为读卡器测试的参考。即使它达到了平均传输速度，也无法充分利用Angelbird V60的最大可能的数据速率。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.3 MB/s
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.3 MB/s -19%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.1 (27.4-50.2)

Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø24.8 (17.2-44.9)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.8 (44.3-80.2)

Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.1 (44.8-88)

软件 - 2年的安全更新

Android 12是预装在Tab P11 2022上的。在本次测试时，安全补丁处于2023年2月的水平，所以他们需要再次更新。

传统上，联想几乎不修改谷歌的操作系统，预装的应用程序的数量也保持在限制范围内。联想承诺安全更新到2025年7月30日，这比我们测试的时间晚了两年多一点。然而，制造商没有说任何关于新操作系统更新的信息。

这款平板电脑可以选择使用内部的生产力模式来优化键盘和鼠标的操作。

Widevine L1认证将使你能够以最高质量享受来自大型平台的流媒体。

通信和GNSS - 带天线的WiFi 6

在我们的测试中，我们看的是Tab P11 2022的WLAN型号。凭借其对WiFi 6的支持，它甚至能够连接到较少使用的、有可能更快的6-GHz频段。

然而，在我们与华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000参考路由器的测试中，它几乎无法利用这些潜在的速度优势。即使它的速度比例如 Honor 垫8或 Oppo Pad Air的速度，但它仍然无法跟上 iPad 10.其原因是，只有一根天线可用于发送和接收。

接收情况还算不错。在靠近路由器的地方，我们得到了完整的信号强度，而在10米（约33英尺）的距离，穿过三面墙，仍然是一半的信号强度。我们注意到浏览器中的页面加载速度稍慢。当我们离路由器更远时，信号就消失了。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	312 (268^min - 341^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	340 (319^min - 348^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	741 (621^min - 759^max) MBit/s +81%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	409 (366^min - 434^max) MBit/s
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	345 (326^min - 357^max) MBit/s -16%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	306 (289^min - 326^max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	816 (764^min - 851^max) MBit/s +66%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	493 (433^min - 516^max) MBit/s
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	357 (323^min - 366^max) MBit/s -28%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	357 (257^min - 376^max) MBit/s -28%

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2); iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø408 (366-434)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2); iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø493 (433-516)

无论你是选择WLAN还是LTE版本，Tab P11 2022都有一个定位模块。尽管前辈，即联想Tab P11从2021年开始，也承诺有能力确定其位置，但在定位路线上存在一些巨大的问题。

不幸的是，联想在继任者中也没有解决这些问题：我们两次尝试在自行车旅行时记录平板电脑的位置，两次都没有得到任何可用的结果。这意味着，定位功能对于导航来说绝对是不够的。

摄像机--更多的是一种权宜之计

在大型平板电脑中，通常相机很少用于拍摄高质量的横向或纵向照片。相反，使用场景更多包括记录情况或扫描二维码。因此，联想在改进Tab P11的相机设备方面也只做了很少的努力。这款平板电脑的背面仍然是一个1300万像素的摄像头，前面是一个800万像素的镜头。

在良好的光线条件下，自拍相机创造的照片是相当可用的，尽管它们仍然可以更清晰并使用一些更多的亮度。后面的主摄像头也是可以接受的快照。但在细节方面，照片在明亮和黑暗的区域缺乏一些动态，在精细的细节方面缺乏清晰度，也缺乏强大的色彩。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Pflanze Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera LowLight

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在我们实验室的最佳光线条件下，主摄像头创造的图像相当清晰。然而，对于精细的细节，往往会失去准确性，而且图片还可以更亮一点。在只有1勒克斯的照度下，相机无法再现物体的情况。

视频可以在30帧/秒的情况下以最大的1080p录制。亮度调节和自动对焦反应迅速而准确，尽管明亮的地方会很快变得太亮。

ColorChecker Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2): 4.85 ∆E min: 1.83 - max: 11.65 ∆E

配件和保修 - 有很多可能性

联想Tab P11第二代的包装盒不包括任何不寻常的配件。有一个20瓦的充电器，一条USB线，和一个SIM卡工具。另一方面，你可以在联想的网上商店购买一些很棒的配件，这些配件可以大大扩展平板电脑的功能：

首先，有一个对开盒，也可以作为平板电脑的支架，使你可以像显示器一样使用它。所有的连接都可以使用，还有一个地方可以存放输入笔。联想要求29美元购买这个箱子。

关于笔，你也可以购买相应的联想Precision Pen 2（2023）。它的价格为59美元，可以通过书写和绘画进行输入，或者用平板电脑处理图形。花大约100美元，你可以买一个键盘盖，把Tab P11 G2变成一个笔记本电脑的替代品，Android 。

联想为该平板电脑提供24个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - 平滑的触摸屏

联想平板电脑的120赫兹触摸屏对我们的输入作出了及时和可靠的反应。与之前的前辈一样，Tab P11 G2支持使用Precision Pen 2进行输入，与这个价格范围内的其他平板电脑相比，这是一个优势。虽然你必须单独购买笔，但联想已经预装了几个软件应用。

对于生物识别解锁，你只能通过前置摄像头使用面部识别。虽然这在许多情况下是足够安全的，但与指纹识别器相比，更容易欺骗它。利用大显示屏的光线，人脸识别在弱光条件下也能非常可靠地工作。

▶ load Youtube video

显示 - 鲜艳的色彩

作为这个价格级别的典型，IPS显示屏提供2000 x 1200像素的分辨率。11.5英寸，它提供了比前代产品多得多的显示面积，但它在亮度方面还不能完全跟上。虽然400cd/m²的亮度对于室内明亮的环境来说是足够的，但在室外使用这款平板电脑时，你可能会有困难。

低黑值允许高对比度，也允许在屏幕上显示出鲜艳的色彩。然而，在我们用光谱光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中，我们也注意到明显的蓝色色调和明亮的绿色和黄色色调的再现略显不准确。


401 cd/m²	408 cd/m²	380 cd/m²
403 cd/m²	423 cd/m²	398 cd/m²
395 cd/m²	388 cd/m²	372 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 423 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 396.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.73 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 423 cd/m²
Contrast: 1459:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
133.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.159

	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"	Lenovo Tab P11 IPS, 2000x1200, 11"	Oppo Pad Air IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Honor Pad 8 IPS, 2000x1200, 12"	Apple iPad 10 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Screen		-13%	-12%	-3%	17%
Brightness middle	423	454 7%	352 -17%	379 -10%	467 10%
Brightness	396	422 7%	339 -14%	382 -4%	468 18%
Brightness Distribution	88	83 -6%	85 -3%	84 -5%	92 5%
Black Level *	0.29	0.57 -97%	0.45 -55%	0.3 -3%	0.49 -69%
Contrast	1459	796 -45%	782 -46%	1263 -13%	953 -35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.32	5.1 4%	4.79 10%	4.76 11%	1.4 74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.87	8.4 15%	8.65 12%	9.25 6%	3.3 67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.6	5.8 12%	5.5 17%	6.7 -2%	2.3 65%
Gamma	2.159 ^102%	1.96 ^112%	2.118 ^104%	2.234 ^98%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	7979 ^81%	7684 ^85%	7889 ^82%	8468 ^77%	6852 ^95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

即使在低亮度设置下，我们也没有注意到任何PWM的闪烁。另一方面，对于要求高的用户来说，屏幕的响应时间太慢。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.4 ms rise
25.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.3 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.1 ms rise
39.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

正如已经怀疑的那样，我们在明亮的日光下在户外拍摄的照片显示，屏幕在以足够的亮度显示内容方面有问题。由于屏幕上的所有反射，这使得它很难仍然识别任何实际的内容。

从任何角度看，可视角度的稳定性都非常好，即使从非常陡峭的视角看，也能轻松识别显示内容。

性能 - 良好的中频功率

随着联发科Helio G99联想Tab P11 G2包含一个当前的中端SoC，为其价格等级带来了很多性能。这意味着你几乎不必担心某个应用程序无法运行，即使在运行苛刻的基准测试时，你仍然可以调整音量而不出现任何延迟。

就纯粹的处理能力而言，目前的Tab P11 G2明显比其前辈快。如果你看一下整体系统评估，例如在PCMark中，差异也很明显，但没有那么大。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 10	1580 Points +222%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +44%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (490 - 576, n=17)	547 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	490 Points
Oppo Pad Air	381 Points -22%
Honor Pad 8	377 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab P11	316 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 10	4027 Points +124%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points +39%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1670 - 1981, n=17)	1828 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	1797 Points
Oppo Pad Air	1625 Points -10%
Honor Pad 8	1522 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab P11	1425 Points -21%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10	691084 Points +121%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (229468 - 375956, n=8)	317183 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	312314 Points
Honor Pad 8	274001 Points -12%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8885 - 11379, n=17)	9894 Points +3%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	9578 Points
Honor Pad 8	6655 Points -31%
Oppo Pad Air	6423 Points -33%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad 10	987 Points +74%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	568 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=10)	565 Points -1%
Honor Pad 8	407 Points -28%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points +47%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2855 - 3120, n=10)	3006 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	2855 Points
Honor Pad 8	2621 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab P11	2350 Points -18%
Apple iPad 10	Points -100%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points +38%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5261 - 6776, n=10)	6230 Points +18%
Honor Pad 8	5817 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	5261 Points
Lenovo Tab P11	5001 Points -5%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points +41%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3454 - 4152, n=10)	3764 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	3454 Points
Honor Pad 8	3361 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab P11	3107 Points -10%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points +232%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2683 - 3002, n=10)	2799 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	2762 Points
Honor Pad 8	2098 Points -24%
Lenovo Tab P11	1870 Points -32%
Web
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	1325 Points
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1150 - 1325, n=10)	1252 Points -6%
Honor Pad 8	1151 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab P11	1049 Points -21%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +731%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (877 - 982, n=8)	908 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	877 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points +23%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	9218 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=9)	8584 Points -7%
Honor Pad 8	4627 Points -50%

Legend

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Tab P11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Oppo Pad Air Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD

Average Mediatek Helio G99

Average of class Tablet

另一方面，在图形性能方面，已经没有任何问题，与2021年的Tab P11相比，目前的平板电脑至少快了一倍。这个价格级别的其他平板电脑也很难跟上。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	2124 Points +544%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	330 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	125 Points -62%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 Points -63%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	2250 Points +558%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	342 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	124 Points -64%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	123 Points -64%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	8539 Points +670%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1109 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -60%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	445 Points -60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	366 Points -67%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1242 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	452 Points -64%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -64%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	373 Points -70%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +3%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -40%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	33 fps -43%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	317 fps +395%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps -36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	36 fps -44%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +58%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -50%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	18 fps -53%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	171 fps +328%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -45%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	20 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	58 fps +152%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -43%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	12 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	120 fps +380%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -40%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	14 fps -44%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	45 fps +246%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.2 fps -45%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.7 fps -48%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	75 fps +400%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps -45%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	7.2 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	34 fps +258%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.5 fps
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.3 fps -44%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.9 fps -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	4.6 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	32 fps +442%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -46%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -46%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2.8 fps -53%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	47 fps +236%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps -36%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps -40%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	7.8 fps -44%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	94 fps +488%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.7 fps -39%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.6 fps -40%
Lenovo Tab P11 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	8.5 fps -47%

在上网时，2022年的Tab P11非常敏捷，加载网页很快，图像也变得可见，没有任何较长的延迟。考虑到快速显示，你可以在没有任何停顿的情况下滚动。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	178.932 Points +220%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points +99%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=9)	66.5 Points +19%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	55.947 Points
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	46.797 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)	31.74 Points -43%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	147 Points +158%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points +88%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=9)	69.6 Points +22%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	57 Points
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	48 Points -16%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	214 Points +168%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	155.2 Points +94%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=8)	95.4 Points +19%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	80 Points
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	70 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)	52 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	272 runs/min +777%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min +293%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=9)	52.5 runs/min +69%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	40.54 runs/min +31%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chome 112)	31 runs/min
Lenovo Tab P11 (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)	28.3 runs/min -9%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	59963 Points +248%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points +70%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=17)	20999 Points +22%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	17239 Points
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	13831 Points -20%
Oppo Pad Air (Chrome 109)	12402 Points -28%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)	9025 Points -48%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Tab P11 (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)	4509 ms * -99%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -65%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	2873.8 ms * -27%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	2268.5 ms *
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=9)	2058 ms * +9%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	547 ms * +76%

* ... smaller is better

与前代产品相比，UFS 2.2存储也是一个重要的进步，缩短了加载时间，加快了复制过程。目前这个价位的其他平板电脑也同样提供快速闪存。

	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	Lenovo Tab P11	Oppo Pad Air	Honor Pad 8	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-44%	8%	8%	-5%	13%
Sequential Read 256KB	822.4	506 -38%	921.6 12%	833.56 1%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -11%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 27%
Sequential Write 256KB	490.6	199 -59%	717 46%	708.51 44%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) 7%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 40%
Random Read 4KB	204.8	118.2 -42%	177.1 -14%	189.57 -7%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) -6%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -8%
Random Write 4KB	201.3	129.6 -36%	172.8 -14%	186.95 -7%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -8%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -6%

游戏 - 不是一个真正的游戏者

虽然Tab P11 G2确实应该适合游戏，因为它提供了一个强大的图形芯片和120-Hz显示屏，但在我们第一次游戏会话和基准测试之后，我们相当失望。大多数游戏只允许最高30帧，一些游戏甚至不提供非常高的图形设置。

PUBG移动版的最低设置只允许勉强达到40帧，而且即使是这样也会出现卡顿。要把它的平板电脑变成一个真正的游戏玩家，联想仍然需要在这里进行一些优化。

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2); PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.5.0: Ø39.4 (37-41)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2); PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.5.0: Ø29.5 (27-31)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2); Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 1.8.0: Ø29.8 (26-32)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2); Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 1.8.0: Ø29.6 (24-32)

排放 - Tab P11保持冷静

温度

在恒定的负载下，我们在背面顶部区域的中心测量到最大的热量发展为44.2°C（111.6°F），紧挨着摄像头。虽然这已经很明显了，但局部的高升温是非常有限的，机箱的其他部分几乎没有升温。

较长的负载对性能也几乎没有任何影响，即使在3DMark Wild Life或Wild Life Extreme中运行了20次，基准测试结果仍然或多或少保持不变。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.44-7.47)

Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.7 (2.68-2.71)

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.67-2.68)

Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø42.4 (41.9-48.6)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.06 (2.05-2.07)

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.737 (0.728-0.748)

Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø11.8 (11.6-13.5)

Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.4 (42.4-51.8)

Max. Load

Idle


30.6 °C	35.1 °C	26.9 °C
28.7 °C	29.1 °C	25.6 °C
27.4 °C	25.2 °C	24.6 °C

Maximum: 35.1 °C
Average: 28.1 °C


25.3 °C	44.2 °C	30.5 °C
26.1 °C	27.8 °C	27.9 °C
25.7 °C	26.5 °C	27.2 °C

Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 29 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38.6 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.8 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

由于它想为你提供娱乐，该平板电脑带来了四个扬声器。我们的测量和测试的主观印象表明，中等大小的房间有足够的音量。

如果你把流行音乐的音量调到最大，声音听起来仍然很清晰，但也有点过分强调，高音开始在我们的耳朵里轰鸣，令人不舒服。如果你稍微降低音量，声音会变得更加圆润。

你还可以通过3.5毫米音频端口或蓝牙连接外部音频设备。虽然这在我们的测试中没有任何问题，但蓝牙编解码器的选择非常有限：有SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC，特别是缺少一些更高质量和更现代的选择。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 适合日常使用的电池寿命

消耗功率

在其2022年的版本中，Tab P11在功耗方面显示出自己相当高效。只有在满负荷的情况下，它才会消耗10瓦来保持运行，这明显比一些竞争对手或前辈使用的多。

你可以用相应的附带充电器为该平板电脑充电，最大功率为20瓦。使用这个，需要长达2:30小时，直到平板电脑完全充电。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1.3 / 1.5 Watt
Load	5 / 10.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) 7500 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 7700 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Apple iPad 10 7606 mAh
Power Consumption		-105%	-7%	-211%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	1.38 -53%	1.1 -22%	1.34 -49%
Idle Average *	1.3	4.56 -251%	1.5 -15%	7.78 -498%
Idle Maximum *	1.5	4.58 -205%	2.1 -40%	7.89 -426%
Load Average *	5	6.33 -27%	4.4 12%	9.05 -81%
Load Maximum *	10.1	9.17 9%	7.2 29%	9.98 1%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2): Ø5.24 (2.22-10.1)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.61 (4.1-5.78)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.063 (0.873-1.552)

电池寿命

电池容量为7500毫安时，比前代产品略低。尽管有更好的效率，Tab P11 G2在长期耐力方面也受到影响，总体运行时间比Tab P11 G2低5%。笔记本电脑P11从2021年开始。

在我们的WLAN测试中为14:39小时，我们的测试装置仍然可以持续很长时间，使它比这个价格级别的许多其他平板电脑更适合日常操作。即使是 iPad 10也需要更频繁地充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		34h 56min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 24min

	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) 7500 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 7700 mAh	Oppo Pad Air 7100 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Apple iPad 10 7606 mAh
Battery Runtime		5%	-6%	-2%	-19%
Reader / Idle	2096	2267 8%		2448 17%	1729 -18%
H.264	1002	892 -11%		838 -16%	740 -26%
WiFi v1.3	879	957 9%	823 -6%	733 -17%	647 -26%
Load	204	233 14%		225 10%	191 -6%

Pros

+ 强大的性能

+ 快速存储

+ 负载下无节流现象

+ 发热有限

+ 有良好的配件可供选择

+ 支持笔输入

+ 通过Widevine L1认证

+ 显示屏色彩强烈

+ 在日常操作中具有合适的电池寿命

Cons

- 不可靠的定位模块

- 支持的蓝牙编解码器很少

- 箱子翘起时发出吱吱声

- 游戏性能弱

- 显示屏有蓝色的色调

- 平庸的相机

结论--有多种用途的配件

联想Tab P11 G2名义上比它的前辈略贵，但实际上你已经可以用一些明显的折扣得到它。它带来了一个明显更大的屏幕，这应该会让大尺寸平板电脑的粉丝满意。那些喜欢轻巧平板电脑的人，会认为与前代产品相比，这一变化更像是一个缺点。

值得注意的是，这款平板电脑可能主要用于室内使用。屏幕亮度只够用，摄像头足以记录事件，但不适合创作真正漂亮的照片。

在性能方面，联想提供了一个明显的升级，增加了快速存储和闪电般的SoC，并提供了一个中端平板电脑，即使对于苛刻的应用也有良好的储备。然而，那些喜欢游戏的人将发现他们在许多游戏中的热情被限制在30帧。你也不应该依赖定位模块，它在我们的测试中出现了一些大问题。

一个亮点是许多配件，特别是与平板电脑兼容的高质量输入笔。然而，所有的配件都必须单独购买。

虽然电池寿命不错，但扬声器的声音相当平庸，而且该平板电脑支持的蓝牙编解码器相对较少，因此，你应该检查你的耳机是否兼容。可选的是，一些供应商还提供了一个4G型号。

通过Tab P11 2022（第二代），联想更新了其中端平板电脑，屏幕更大，性能更强。包括输入笔在内的优秀配件也可用于这一代。

尽管你仍然可以购买第一代的Tab P11，更新支持将在不久的某个时候结束。拥有类似的大屏幕，奥普Pad Air显著更轻、更薄。

价格和可用性

在本次测试时，联想Tab P11 2022（第二代）的版本可从制造商处获得，起价310美元。

亚马逊也提供几个版本的Tab P11第2代，起价264美元（有4GB和6GB版本可供选择，有些还包含配件）。

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) - 04/26/2023 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

81 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

65 / 80 → 82%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

37 / 70 → 53%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 89%

Battery

90%

Display

82%

Games Performance

23 / 78 → 29%

Application Performance

61 / 92 → 66%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

68 / 91 → 75%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Average

71%

82%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.