联想Tab P11 5G评测。中档平板电脑，到处都能快速上网

Name: Lenovo Tab P11 5G
Brand: Lenovo

无线电始终处于运行状态。

得益于其移动无线电模块，联想Tab P11 5G的使用范围非常广泛：可以作为导航设备，在远离WLAN的地方进行网上冲浪，甚至可以用来打电话。这款11英寸的平板电脑是否是日常生活中的好伙伴，将在我们的详细评论中揭晓。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/09/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen

一款带有5G模块和电话功能的11英寸平板电脑确实很罕见。联想Tab P11 5G填补了这个市场空白，因此提供了广泛的可能用途。

除了尺寸之外，这款平板电脑与Tab P11有很大不同。差异，后者与联想Tab P11与Tab P12 Pro有较多相似之处。 Tab P12 Pro它也配备了5G，但你不能用它打电话。

笔输入和全面的配件使联想Tab P11 5G成为一款有趣的平板电脑，它不仅可以在家里的客厅里找到自己的位置，还可以在办公桌上找到自己的位置。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Tab P Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 570 (Cortex-A77/A55)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 619

Memory

6 GB

Display

11.00 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 212 PPI, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 110 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, hall, gyroscope

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B66), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 2G (B2/B3/B5/B8), LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 258.4 x 163

Battery

7500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 20 Watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4 speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, Docking port, fanless

Weight

520 g

Price

409 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Lenovo Tab P11 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619	520 g	7.5 mm	11.00"	2000x1200
83.1 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2023	Oppo Pad Air SD 680, Adreno 610	440 g	6.9 mm	10.36"	2000x1200
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	445 g	7.05 mm	10.61"	2000x1200
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Xiaomi Pad 5 SD 860, Adreno 640	511 g	6.85 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Kompanio 1300T, Mali-G77 MP9	480 g	6.8 mm	11.20"	2560x1536

外壳 - 重型金属底盘

淘宝网笔记本P12 Pro也是这个外壳的灵感来源：Tab P11 5G的背面是哑光的，分为两个区域，根据不同的视角显示不同的灰色。铝合金再次被作为材料使用。指纹相当不明显，但一段时间后，如果油腻的条纹困扰着你，你将不可避免地不得不清洁平板电脑（在没有保护罩的情况下）。

稳定性还不错，但你还是应该注意保护平板电脑不受太大的扭转压力影响，这种压力很快就会在屏幕的液晶上显现出来。做工很好，即使没有盖子，Tab P11 5G的握感也很好。然而，511克的重量，它并不完全是一个轻量级。

屏幕周围的边缘允许舒适的操作，同时足够纤细，使Tab P11 5G看起来很现代。这款联想平板电脑有三种颜色：灰色、白色或绿色。

尺寸比较

设备 - 也可作为显示器使用

在内存和存储方面，有两个变种可供选择。

6GB内存/128GB
8GB内存/256GB

发布时的价格最初约为600欧元（约合650美元），但后来大幅下降。这里评论的是较小的内存版本。

有趣的是，联想安装了一个内部连接到USB3.0的USB端口。这可以在一定程度上加快数据传输。

更重要的是，这个USB端口也可以作为一个DisplayPort使用。因此，你可以很容易地用适当的电缆将平板电脑连接到PC上，并将其作为一个额外的显示器，用触摸和笔输入。反之，也可以将一个外部显示器连接到平板电脑上。

在平板电脑的底面也有波戈针，可以用来将平板电脑连接到扩展坞。

不幸的是，没有NFC，所以你不能使用移动支付服务。

微型SD卡读卡器

microSD读卡器的功能独立于SIM卡插槽，因此用户可以同时使用这两个插槽。我们用天使鸟V60参考卡测试了microSD插槽的速度。

我们发现，联想Tab P11 5G在复制测试和CPDT基准测试中都取得了非常好的数值。数据传输和卡的读取速度相对较快，但仍然比内部存储慢很多。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.6 MB/s
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.3 MB/s -20%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.27 MB/s -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	9.48 MB/s -64%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø28.9 (21.1-37.7)

Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø24.8 (17.2-44.9)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (6.67-45.8)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.1 (27.7-50)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø75.6 (14.2-95)

Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.1 (44.8-88)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.1 (7.54-78.5)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73 (49.1-80.3)

软件 - 非常多的股票Android

Tab P11 5G最初配备了Android 11，但后来更新为Android 12。在审查时，安全补丁是2023年1月的，因此仍然是相当最新的。然而，根据制造商的更新时间表，该平板电脑只能在2024年6月30日之前收到更新。

该软件与vanillaAndroid 非常相似，只有相对较少的应用预装了前作。智能清洁器应用程序，也喜欢显示广告，有点令人讨厌，但可以很容易地删除。

生产力模式将界面转变为对鼠标和键盘友好的操作系统，并且还在屏幕底部显示打开的Windows风格的应用程序。

由于通过了DRM-L1认证，Tab P11 5G还提供了娱乐价值，能够以高清显示主要平台的流媒体。

通信和GNSS - Tab P11 5G与快速无线网络

一个非常积极的方面是，这款平板电脑配备了一个手机模块，甚至支持最新的5G标准。否则，这只能在明显更昂贵的平板电脑中找到，如iPad 10联想的Tab P11 5G还支持相当多的LTE频率，因此，你也可以在国际上许多国家使用移动互联网。

还有一个电话功能，它通过平板电脑的麦克风和内部扬声器工作，在我们的测试通话中功能非常好。

在我们几天的随机抽样测试中，这款平板电脑在网络选择方面一再被证明有些不稳定。例如，它不断在4G和4G+之间切换。接收质量也没有达到高质量智能手机的水平，但通常足以以体面的速度冲浪，即使在室内也是如此。

虽然WLAN模块只支持WiFi 5这个最快的标准，但它使用MIMO 2x2，即在发送和接收方向都有2根天线，理论上可以将速度提高一倍。事实上，Tab P11 5G对于WiFi 5设备来说是非常快的，实现了约600MBit/s的接收率和约511MBit/s的发送率，尽管这里也有较大的下降。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	635 (320^min - 652^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	538 (317^min - 618^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	921 (464^min - 934^max) MBit/s +51%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	608 (568^min - 629^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	367 (358^min - 370^max) MBit/s -40%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	306 (289^min - 326^max) MBit/s -50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	883 (863^min - 903^max) MBit/s +73%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	511 (344^min - 584^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s -28%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	357 (257^min - 376^max) MBit/s -30%

Lenovo Tab P11 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø608 (568-629)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø511 (344-584)

作为一个5G设备，Tab P11 5G自然也配备了一个追踪模块。这与所有主要的卫星网络进行通信，并在户外迅速确定一个人的位置，最远可达3米。然而，用于跟踪完善的SBAS系统没有被使用。

当然，我们也带着Tab P11 5G去骑车，在现实世界的实践中测试它的定位能力。地图定位并不总是完美的，其结果是我们有时会出现穿过房屋或前院的情况。令人惊讶的是，这款平板电脑在老城区的狭窄街道上比在住宅区的宽阔街道上表现得更好。

总的来说，联想平板电脑可以作为一个导航系统使用。但是，如果你需要绝对的准确性，你应该到其他地方去看看。

照相机 - 对于平板电脑来说是平均水平

这些摄像头提醒我们，Tab P11 5G是一款相对较大的中档平板电脑，大多数人不太可能用来拍照。因此，联想对良好的图片质量不重视：背面只有一个相机镜头，后面的传感器来自OmniVision，分辨率为1300万像素。

照片看起来比非常便宜的平板电脑更明亮、更清晰，但很难跟上高端智能手机。在低光下，该传感器无法实现对黑暗区域的充分表现，我们在低光场景的照片和实验室1勒克斯照度下都注意到了这一点。另一方面，在完整的实验室照明下，该相机可以拍摄出令人满意的、相当清晰的照片，即使在彩色背景下，文字也容易辨认。

然而，该相机更适用于快照和扫描二维码，而不是真正的照片癖好者。

视频可以以最大的1080p和30帧的速度录制。亮度、曝光调整和自动对焦都做得很好。因此，在正常的照明条件下，可以以令人满意的质量记录视频。

前置摄像头的分辨率为800万像素，在光线良好的情况下可以拍出合格的自拍，但你不应该把它们放大太多。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - plant Main camera - environment Main camera - low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

附件和保修 - 提供数字笔和键盘

这款平板电脑配有一个充电器（最大功率为20瓦），一条USB线和一个用于打开SIM卡和microSD卡插槽的工具。不包括数字化笔，但可以从联想购买，价格约为60美元。注意事项。Tab P11 5G只支持联想Precision Pen 2，而不支持较新的Precision Pen 3，后者包括在Tab P12 Pro中。Tab P12 Pro.

可以从联想购买一个键盘盖，价格不到100美元。

在德国，制造商为其平板电脑提供两年的保修期。这在其他国家可能有所不同，所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

输入设备和操作 - 60赫兹的面板有些缓慢

总的来说，这款平板电脑的触摸屏可以可靠而流畅地操作。然而，60赫兹的显示屏使该系统的反应速度似乎不如，例如OPPA Pad Air的120赫兹面板。在屏幕上滚动或快速移动时，这种差异尤其明显。

如前所述，这款平板电脑还可以使用数字笔，有4,096个压力级别可供选择。该笔还能识别保持的角度，因此可用于孵化。

由于其格式，这款平板电脑在纵向模式下的可用性更高；在宽屏模式下，键盘往往会占用大量空间并阻挡屏幕内容。

缺少一个指纹传感器。你可以用面部解锁来解锁联想Tab P11 5G，但在光线良好的情况下，经过几次尝试，这款平板电脑未能识别我们的脸。作为比较，我们在相同条件下用其他平板电脑和智能手机进行了测试，它们扫描我们的脸部没有问题。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏--平板电脑屏幕黯淡无光

该屏幕的5:3分辨率为2,000 x 1,200，长宽比介于4:3和16:9之间，所以它既是一个很好的折中方案，也是一个很好的分辨率，可以实现全高清内容和精细的图像。

有些恼人的是，联想只使用了60赫兹的面板，因此平板电脑上的移动图像不能如此流畅地显示。

屏幕也缺乏亮度：我们测得的平均亮度为338cd/m²，明显低于许多同等价位的平板电脑的亮度。这使得Tab P11 5G的户外使用变得困难。0.47cd/m²的黑色水平也只是平均水平，导致762:1的对比度相当低，因此显示色彩相当暗淡。


315 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	333 cd/m²
326 cd/m²	358 cd/m²	346 cd/m²
330 cd/m²	354 cd/m²	329 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 358 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 337.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.63 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 358 cd/m²
Contrast: 762:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.211

	Lenovo Tab P11 5G IPS, 2000x1200, 11"	Oppo Pad Air IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6"	Xiaomi Pad 5 IPS, 2560x1600, 11"	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 OLED, 2560x1536, 11.2"
Screen		-7%	33%	13%	52%
Brightness middle	358	352 -2%	418 17%	491 37%	631 76%
Brightness	338	339 0%	402 19%	473 40%	633 87%
Brightness Distribution	88	85 -3%	90 2%	91 3%	91 3%
Black Level *	0.47	0.45 4%	0.28 40%	0.87 -85%
Contrast	762	782 3%	1493 96%	564 -26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.94	4.79 -22%	2.3 42%	1.9 52%	1.7 57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.38	8.65 -17%	5.4 27%	4.1 44%	4.2 43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.7	5.5 -17%	3.7 21%	3 36%	2.6 45%
Gamma	2.211 ^100%	2.118 ^104%	2.21 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7666 ^85%	7889 ^82%	6595 ^99%	7182 ^91%	6496 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测量中，在明亮的灰阶中可以看到明显的蓝色偏移。颜色被合理准确地再现；只有白色和明亮的橙色和棕色色调显示出较大的偏差。

没有检测到PWM闪烁，但响应时间相对较慢，所以雄心勃勃的游戏玩家不太可能对该显示器感到满意。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.4 ms rise
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.6 ms rise
35.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于亮度低，显示屏很少能胜过你在户外时出现的反射。因此，该平板电脑最适合在室内使用。

可视角度的稳定性很好：根据不同的侧面，你会注意到在非常平坦的角度，图像会略微变亮或变暗，但它总是清晰可辨。

性能 - 提供中端动力

高通公司的高通骁龙750G 5GSoC提供中端性能，有2个集群的8个处理单元：2个高性能核心，频率高达2.2GHz，6个节俭型核心，频率高达1.8GHz。

这使Tab P11 5G在我们的基准测试中处于中间位置。其他廉价的对比设备，如红米Pad或 Oppo Pad Air落后，而更高端的平板电脑，如 Tab P11 Pro Gen 2提供了更多的动力。

在日常使用中，联想平板电脑的性能足以流畅地运行应用程序。然而，如果你想使用真正复杂的程序或进行大量的多任务处理，你就必须购买更昂贵的设备。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 5	784 Points +22%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	773 Points +20%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (632 - 658, n=9)	647 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	643 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	558 Points -13%
Oppo Pad Air	381 Points -41%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 5	2768 Points +51%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	2669 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (1792 - 2009, n=9)	1896 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1889 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	1837 Points
Oppo Pad Air	1625 Points -12%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	607789 Points +55%
Xiaomi Pad 5	575553 Points +47%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points +20%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	392823 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (356422 - 393060, n=4)	383788 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	316212 Points -20%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 5	11318 Points +51%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	10776 Points +44%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9475 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (7498 - 9800, n=5)	8541 Points +14%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	7498 Points
Oppo Pad Air	6423 Points -14%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points +54%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	733 Points +46%
Xiaomi Pad 5	635 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	575 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	502 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (485 - 502, n=2)	494 Points -2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 5	5154 Points +46%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	5144 Points +46%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (3459 - 3708, n=7)	3608 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	3519 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2988 Points -15%
System
Xiaomi Pad 5	8805 Points +24%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	7119 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	7100 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (6242 - 7162, n=7)	6969 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	6509 Points -9%
Memory
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	6576 Points +41%
Xiaomi Pad 5	5788 Points +24%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	4671 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (4211 - 4769, n=7)	4595 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	3550 Points -24%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5	10293 Points +159%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	9383 Points +136%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (3947 - 4022, n=7)	3991 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	3974 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2875 Points -28%
Web
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	1598 Points +38%
Xiaomi Pad 5	1346 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (1161 - 1468, n=7)	1318 Points +14%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1201 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	1161 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +148%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	2942 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G ()	2942 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	892 Points -70%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	716 Points -76%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9213 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	8461 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (7776 - 8436, n=2)	8106 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	7776 Points

Legend

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Oppo Pad Air Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, ARM Mali-G77 MP9, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G

Average of class Tablet

Tab P11 5G在图形性能方面也处于中游水平。不能指望它运行图形要求高的应用程序，但对于大多数标准应用程序来说，性能是足够的。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1230 Points +272%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	970 Points +193%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	331 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	329 Points -1%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	125 Points -62%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1253 Points +272%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	985 Points +192%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	343 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	337 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	124 Points -63%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4333 Points +289%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3436 Points +208%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1215 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1115 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -60%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4298 Points +285%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3428 Points +207%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1237 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1116 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	452 Points -59%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7531 Points +155%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6981 Points +137%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2948 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2644 Points -10%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1359 Points -54%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8601 Points +205%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8202 Points +191%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2816 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2442 Points -13%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1184 Points -58%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5247 Points +49%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4590 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3717 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3528 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2807 Points -20%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5000 Points +92%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2608 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2452 Points -6%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1297 Points -50%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6876 Points +169%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2559 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2360 Points -8%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1137 Points -56%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2841 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2796 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2560 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2558 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2764 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2583 Points -7%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1337 Points -52%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2624 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2412 Points -8%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1162 Points -56%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3439 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3396 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2830 Points -17%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps +88%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +87%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	60 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	55 fps -8%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	184 fps +102%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	184 fps +102%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	91 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps -31%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps +88%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +63%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	40 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -12%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +167%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +142%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	45 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -11%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +52%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +38%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	29 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -21%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps +139%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +136%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	33 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -24%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +53%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps +47%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -24%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps +153%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +147%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -21%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps +73%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +55%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps -24%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.3 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +188%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +147%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps -26%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -56%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps +61%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +44%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -33%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps -51%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps +170%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +135%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -30%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.7 fps -51%

用联想Tab P11 5G上网是相当快的。页面加载速度很快，在滚动时往往能立即得到图像。关于基准测试，联想平板电脑再次处于中场，而其他平板电脑被证明明显更快。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points +65%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	73 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chrome 109)	67.456 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	64.891 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	55.842 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (40.8 - 67.5, n=7)	54.3 Points -20%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points +70%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	63 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chrome 109)	63 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G ()	63 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	56 Points -11%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	155.2 Points +71%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	96 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chrome 109)	91 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	84 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (54 - 91, n=6)	76.8 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	75 Points -18%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min +194%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	61.3 runs/min +48%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	48.9 runs/min +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (41.5 - 47.6, n=6)	44.4 runs/min +7%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chome 109)	41.5 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	38.1 runs/min -8%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	28601 Points +33%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	28456 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chrome 109)	21566 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (17730 - 21566, n=7)	18390 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	17557 Points -19%
Oppo Pad Air (Chrome 109)	12402 Points -42%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -97%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	2443.7 ms * -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (1897 - 2665, n=7)	2373 ms * -25%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chrome 109)	1897.2 ms *
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	1603 ms * +16%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	1502.4 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

联想安装的存储设备比许多对比设备的速度要慢一些，特别是在连续的写操作中。一般来说，加载时间不会太长，数据传输也相当快。

	Lenovo Tab P11 5G	Oppo Pad Air	Xiaomi Redmi Pad	Xiaomi Pad 5	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		16%	49%	22%	116%	-23%	21%
Sequential Read 256KB	921.5	921.6 0%	976.9 6%	1459 58%	1851.74 101%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) -18%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 13%
Sequential Write 256KB	415.2	717 73%	883.6 113%	534 29%	1408.87 239%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) -28%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 65%
Random Read 4KB	174.6	177.1 1%	250.82 44%	208.7 20%	289.26 66%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) -12%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 8%
Random Write 4KB	195.4	172.8 -12%	257.02 32%	158.9 -19%	308.21 58%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) -33%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -3%

游戏--高设置几乎不可能

乍一看，这款平板电脑的大屏幕可能会诱发真正的游戏热。然而，它不是最快的，只有60赫兹，而且只为较简单的游戏提供足够的性能。我们测试了复杂的游戏，如PUBG Mobile，但我们无法在这里选择最高设置。即使在可能的最高设置下，也只能达到30帧，而在低细节下则是40帧。

在可能的最高设置下，《暗黑破坏神：不朽 》在一些地方显示出明显的帧率下降，而且你在这里也无法选择高帧率和高解析度。

显示器上的控制装置工作得非常好，位置传感器在无尽跑酷游戏中也做得很好。

Lenovo Tab P11 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.4.0: Ø38.9 (29-41)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.4.0: Ø29.7 (28-30)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 1.7.2: Ø30 (29-31)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 1.7.2: Ø29.9 (26-31)

排放 - 几乎没有加热，几乎没有节流

温度

这款平板电脑的最高温度保持在33.7℃，完全没有问题，所以联想Tab P11 5G应该不会有任何过热的问题，即使在炎热的环境中。这也被持续负载下非常稳定的性能所证实，这是由3DMark压力测试确定的。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.69 (6.68-6.71)

Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.7 (2.68-2.71)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.39-7.47)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.5 (22.3-25.5)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.02 (1.957-2.03)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.03-2.07)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.77 (6.59-7.45)

Max. Load

Idle


29.4 °C	28.6 °C	23.8 °C
27.5 °C	27.2 °C	23.9 °C
26 °C	25.3 °C	22.9 °C

Maximum: 29.4 °C
Average: 26.1 °C


25.3 °C	33.2 °C	33.7 °C
25.3 °C	28.5 °C	29.1 °C
24.3 °C	26.3 °C	26.8 °C

Maximum: 33.7 °C
Average: 28.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

联想Tab P11 5G内置了四个扬声器。它们可以发挥相当大的音量，提供良好的声音，所以你可以享受流行歌曲。然而，在最大音量下，高音略显夸张，所以你应该把它调低一点，以获得最佳音效。古典音乐也可以通过扬声器收听，个别乐器可以很容易地被识别。然而，这里缺乏低音是比较明显的。

外部音频设备也可以通过USB-C端口或蓝牙连接。这可以顺利进行，很多编解码器可用于无线传输，包括现代的aptX Adaptive和aptX TWS+。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 平均运行时间

消耗功率

联想Tab P11 5G在低负荷下相当节俭，但有时在负荷下需要大量的电力。但它也提供了良好的性能，因此耗电量总体上是可以接受的。

附带的充电器最多可提供20瓦的电量，因此该平板电脑的大电池需要3小时左右才能再次充满电。如果你在充电过程中使用平板电脑，这将需要更长时间。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.1 / 3.3 / 4 Watt
Load	7.2 / 11 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab P11 5G 7500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 8200 mAh
Power Consumption		10%	-6%	-38%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	0.93 15%	0.99 10%	3 -173%
Idle Average *	3.3	4.02 -22%	4.2 -27%	4.21 -28%
Idle Maximum *	4	4.07 -2%	4.22 -6%	4.3 -8%
Load Average *	7.2	5.52 23%	7.88 -9%	6.8 6%
Load Maximum *	11	6.89 37%	10.63 3%	9.5 14%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G: Ø7.97 (4.49-11)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.31 (7.05-7.89)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.86 (2.68-3.5)

电池寿命

联想Tab P11 5G的电池容量为7,500毫安时，相对较小。因此，在运行时间方面，它不得不向许多同类平板电脑认输。在我们的WLAN测试中，12:42小时是个不错的数值，但Oppo Pad Air或小米红米Pad表明，在这里还有更多的可能性。

尽管如此，它绝对足够在家里的客厅里冲浪一天，而且有足够的耐力在路上使用。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		28h 52min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 58min

	Lenovo Tab P11 5G 7500 mAh	Oppo Pad Air 7100 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 8200 mAh
Battery Runtime		8%	39%	10%	-19%
Reader / Idle	1732		3640 110%	2641 52%	1016 -41%
H.264	943		971 3%	1000 6%	728 -23%
WiFi v1.3	762	823 8%	1057 39%	733 -4%	564 -26%
Load	298		310 4%	257 -14%	337 13%

Pros

+ 5G模块，包括电话功能

+ 支持许多4G频率

+ 通过MIMO 2x2实现快速WiFi

+ 时尚的金属外壳

+ 支持笔

+ 良好的配件范围

+ 几乎没有任何加热

+ 合适的扬声器声音

+ 库存Android

+ 显示端口

Cons

- 相对较重

- 沉闷的屏幕

- 硬盘有点慢

- 相机质量一般

- 充电速度慢

- 没有eSIM卡

- 没有NFC

评语--普通而又特别

联想Tab P11 5G在许多方面是一款典型的中端平板电脑：你得到的是一款价格一般的平板电脑，运行时间令人满意，性能中等。

然而，它也有一些真正的亮点，如光滑的金属外壳，良好的定位能力，快速的WLAN，手写笔输入的可能性和体面的声音扬声器。此外，还有5G模块，可以在没有WLAN的地区提供互联网连接，甚至可以打电话。

不足之处是摄像头质量一般，面部解锁功能失效，硬盘速度有点慢。联想本可以选择质量更高的部件，尤其是黑屏，从而大大提升其平板电脑的价值。

Tab P11 5G是那些寻找一个不太昂贵的带有5G模块的11英寸设备的合适的平板电脑。尽管在屏幕和摄像头方面存在小的弱点，但它绝对值得推荐。

带有5G模块的廉价平板电脑实际上是相当罕见的。这款联想Tab M8 2022提供了一个LTE选项，但它也明显较小。与华为的MatePad T10s你必须处理内部操作系统，该系统与谷歌应用程序的兼容性有限。Apple's 第九代iPad带LTE的价格要高几百美元，但却是一个非常高质量的选择。

价格和可用性

在审查时，这款平板电脑在一些国家似乎没有通过联想的官方网店出售。建议感兴趣的买家通过亚马逊等转售商查询。例如，在英国，128GB的版本可以通过亚马逊购买，价格为420.42英镑。.印度亚马逊列出了256 GB的版本，价格为39,999英镑。.

上述的例子并不详尽。价格截至2023年2月8日，可能会有变化。

Lenovo Tab P11 5G - 02/03/2023 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

67 / 80 → 84%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

54 / 70 → 77%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 89%

Battery

90%

Display

83%

Games Performance

29 / 78 → 37%

Application Performance

76 / 92 → 83%

Temperature

96%

Noise

100%

Audio

76 / 91 → 84%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Average

76%

85%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.