Honor Pad 8平板电脑评论。12英寸平板电脑，价格便宜

Name: Honor Pad 8
Brand: Honor

大干一场。

Honor 正在以Pad 8的形式推出其首款平板电脑，从而试图在平板电脑类别中打下自己的烙印。Pad 8是目前市场上最便宜的12英寸平板电脑之一，价格为300美元。它还具有坚实的中端性能和功能。我们的评论揭示了XXL平板电脑在实践中的表现以及它的不足之处。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/19/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

12英寸的显示屏尺寸，光滑的铝制外壳，以及带有8个扬声器的环绕声系统。那些期待Honor Tab 8面临高价的人可能会大吃一惊。这款平板电脑配备了6GB内存、128GB存储空间和一个 Snapdragon 680，价格仅为300美元左右，这使得它目前成为同尺寸中价格最合理的Android 平板电脑。

尽管价格很低，但这台平板电脑的其他设备并不逊色。这包括一个7250毫安时的大电池，支持22.5瓦的快速充电，以及跨屏幕工作的特殊操作系统功能。

Test device courtesy of Honor Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor Pad 8 (Pad Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR4

Display

12.00 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 194 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 109 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, DRM WideVine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, USB OTG, DTS:X Ultra

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 278.54 x 174.06

Battery

7250 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 22,5 W charging speed (max. 10V 2.25A)

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, 1/5", videos up to 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, videos up to 1080p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: 8 speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 22,5W charger, USB cable, Quick start guide, Warranty information, MagicUI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

520 g, Power Supply: 52 g

Price

350 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
81.7 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Honor Pad 8 SD 680, Adreno 610	520 g	6.9 mm	12.00"	2000x1200
88.5 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	487 g	7.5 mm	10.20"	2160x1620
84.1 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2021	Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4	490 g	7.5 mm	11.00"	2000x1200
85.8 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619	608 g	6.3 mm	12.40"	2560x1600
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Xiaomi Pad 5 SD 860, Adreno 640	511 g	6.85 mm	11.00"	2560x1600

外壳 - 薄而优质的铝制底盘

Honor Pad 8被装在一个7.9毫米薄的铝制一体成型的外壳中，再加上其唯一可用的蓝色小时的磨砂表面处理，给人以高品质的印象。由于其520克的重量，这款12英寸的平板电脑握起来感觉很轻。音量摇杆和电源按钮稳稳地坐在金属底盘上，没有晃动，并且有一个牢固的压力点。

得益于87%的显示-表面比率，Pad 8提供了一个超薄设计和用户友好的良好组合。屏幕边框四边的宽度刚刚超过7毫米，这使得平板电脑可以舒适地用一只手握住，而不会在显示屏上做出错误的输入。自拍相机也位于边框中以节省空间，从而方便地从用户的视野中消失。

对于那些真正希望这样做的人来说，Pad 8的中间可以凹陷，当它的两个短边握住时，其金属底盘可以在扭转压力下稍微扭曲一下。但考虑到大显示屏的对角线，Honor Pad 8的稳定性相当好，对于日常使用来说绰绰有余。然而，这款平板电脑缺乏IP认证。

背面的500万像素摄像头从外壳上突出几毫米，这意味着该平板电脑不能完全平躺在桌子上。尽管如此，由于其大尺寸，它几乎没有来回晃动，甚至在轻拍摄像头旁边的角落时也是如此。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Honor Pad 8 Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Xiaomi Pad 5 Apple iPad 2021 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 8个扬声器，支持高清流媒体

Honor Pad 8只有一个存储版本。它拥有6GB的LPDDR4内存和128GB的UFS 2.2存储空间，官方价格约为299.90美元。这款Honor 平板电脑通过总共8个扬声器产生强大的环绕声，支持DTS:X Ultra。

其他功能包括一个具有OTG功能的USB-C端口，速度为USB 2.0，由于缺乏3.5毫米插孔，必须通过电缆连接音频设备。该平板电脑支持DRM Widevine L1，因此也可以播放高清质量的流媒体。

软件--Android 12，具有生产力功能

Pad 8结合Android 12和Honor's Magic UI 6.1用户界面运行。在测试时（11月中旬，构建号为6.1.0.141），Android 的安全补丁是2022年8月1日的，因此已经相当过时了。到目前为止，Honor ，没有明确说明Pad 8的安全补丁和系统升级将供应多久。

Magic UI 6.1的两个软件功能充分利用了12英寸平板电脑的屏幕尺寸：多窗口模式和跨屏工作。

多窗口模式允许在平板电脑上同时显示多达4个应用程序，它们可以彼此相邻或在上方，并可以改变大小。此外，图像、文本和文件可以在打开的应用程序之间传输，照片可以从照片应用程序拖到电子邮件应用程序，作为附件发送。

多窗口模式并非每个应用都支持，但在我们的测试中，它与一些应用的功能是完美的，包括YouTube、Chrome、Google Photos和Honor"自己的笔记应用Memo"。

用户可以将Pad 8与Honor 智能手机配对，进行跨屏工作。智能手机的屏幕镜像在平板电脑的屏幕上，从而可以将照片和视频从智能手机上拖放到平板电脑上。然而，只有Honor ，配备Magic UI 3.0及以上版本的智能手机才能兼容。

通信和GNSS - 只有WiFi 5，没有GPS

Honor Pad 8在通信方面受到限制。尽管移动网络菜单项出现在Android 设置中，但Honor 并没有为其平板电脑提供移动选项。NFC和GPS模块也没有。这样就只剩下蓝牙5.1和Wi-Fi 5作为通信模块。

连接到我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，Honor Pad 8在发送和接收方向都实现了良好和稳定的Wi-Fi传输速率。在大约350MB/s的速率下，这属于Wi-Fi 5的能力范围。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	635 (320^min - 652^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	630 (597^min - 669^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	587 (290^min - 624^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	343 (327^min - 349^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	655 (601^min - 674^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	538 (317^min - 618^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	485 (191^min - 554^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	352 (334^min - 359^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	345 (326^min - 357^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	357 (323^min - 366^max) MBit/s

Honor Pad 8; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø344 (326-357)

Honor Pad 8; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø357 (323-366)

摄像头 - 500万像素主摄像头，具有快照质量

一般来说，你不应该对平板电脑中的集成摄像头期望过高。如果你看一下Honor Pad 8的产品网站，这里似乎也是这种情况。在那里，摄像头甚至没有出现在平板电脑的描述中，而是被隐藏在技术数据中。

通过阅读规格，我们了解到，主摄像头和自拍摄像头的分辨率都只有500万像素。在相机菜单中，我们发现两个摄像头都能以每秒30帧的速度录制高达1080p的视频。单个麦克风的工作做得相当好。

主摄像头和自拍镜拍摄的照片和视频的质量不高。因此，照片并不特别清晰，而且总是有些冲淡的感觉。另一方面，这两个摄像头一起再现了相当生动和逼真的色彩。然而，主摄像头无法应对低光拍摄，而且很难呈现出细节。

相机软件的一个特殊功能是文档模式，然而，它并没有实现其承诺。文档模式会自动裁剪拍摄的页面，但在测试中却无法清晰地显示文本页面，既没有文本识别功能，也没有创建PDF文件的选项。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 Low light shot

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

下面我们仔细看看
，在受控的照明条件下，Honor Pad 8的主摄像头。

在最佳照明条件下，它相当准确地再现了ColorChecker测试图的颜色，只在较深的绿色和棕色调中显示出与参考颜色的较大偏差。测试图表也比较清晰，但图表元素之间的过渡在图像中心出现磨损。

主相机在1勒克斯的余光下完全被淹没了；测试图显得非常有颗粒感和黑暗。但它的元素在某种程度上仍然可以被识别。

配件和保修 - 包括22.5瓦的电源

Honor 包括一条USB电缆（A型到C型），一个22.5瓦的电源适配器，一份快速入门指南，以及Pad 8的服务保证卡。制造商在其网络商店中没有提供任何专门为该平板电脑定制的配件。

Honor Pad 8在欧盟有24个月的保修期。这可能因地区而异，所以在购买前一定要向你的供应商查询。在其网站上，制造商将附带的电源适配器的保修期限制为6个月，附带的USB线的保修期限制为3个月。

输入设备和操作 - 只有60赫兹，没有主动笔输入

Honor Pad 8的IPS屏幕对输入的反应迅速而准确。对于这种尺寸的平板电脑来说，主动笔输入是必须的。然而，在Pad 8上只能用电容笔输入，工作起来就不那么准确了。此外，Honor ，既没有为其平板电脑配备合适的笔，也没有键盘盖。

习惯于在移动设备中使用高于60赫兹刷新率的用户将立即注意到Honor Pad 8的差异。与竞争对手相比，如小米Pad 5120赫兹的屏幕相比，我们的评测样本感觉不那么顺畅，这一点在滚动菜单和网站时出现的滞后效应中很明显。

这款平板电脑上没有指纹传感器，因此只有自拍相机的二维人脸识别可用于生物识别认证。这在良好的照明条件下可以可靠地工作，但它不是一个特别安全的登录方法。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 无PWM的IPS面板

Honor Pad 8的IPS屏幕的分辨率为2,000 x 1,200，相当于5:3的长宽比，像素密度为194PPI，不算太高。该屏幕不支持HDR10、HLG或Dolby Vision。然而，考虑到它的低亮度值，无论如何这都没有什么意义，因为HDR效果会相当不引人注目。

在全白背景下，IPS面板的平均亮度为381.6cd/m²，这使它处于部分更明亮的对比设备行列的最末端。如果亮度测量局限于单个图像部分（APL18测量），最大可能达到386 cd/m²。

虽然许多IPS面板使用脉冲宽度调制（PWM）来控制屏幕亮度，但我们在Honor Pad 8中没有发现任何PWM闪烁。因此，敏感的用户可以毫不犹豫地使用这款平板电脑。


432 cd/m²	366 cd/m²	362 cd/m²
379 cd/m²	379 cd/m²	383 cd/m²
368 cd/m²	394 cd/m²	371 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 432 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 381.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 379 cd/m²
Contrast: 1263:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.76 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.234

	Honor Pad 8 IPS, 2000x1200, 12"	Apple iPad 2021 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2"	Lenovo Tab P11 Plus IPS, 2000x1200, 11"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 12.4"	Xiaomi Pad 5 IPS, 2560x1600, 11"
Screen		21%	8%	49%	-2%
Brightness middle	379	507 34%	410 8%	619 63%	491 30%
Brightness	382	491 29%	400 5%	593 55%	473 24%
Brightness Distribution	84	90 7%	83 -1%	91 8%	91 8%
Black Level *	0.3	0.5 -67%	0.29 3%	0.22 27%	0.87 -190%
Contrast	1263	1014 -20%	1414 12%	2814 123%	564 -55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.76	1.7 64%	4.47 6%	2.6 45%	1.9 60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.25	3.9 58%	8.84 4%	6.6 29%	4.1 56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.7	2.4 64%	5.1 24%	4 40%	3 55%
Gamma	2.234 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.248 ^98%	2.17 ^101%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	8468 ^77%	6923 ^94%	7966 ^82%	6973 ^93%	7182 ^91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

在显示设置中，你只能通过色温选择来调整屏幕颜色，因为没有其他显示模式可用。在预设的 "标准 "设置下，显示器提供了最平衡的色彩表现，但在画质方面仍然只得到了中等的分数。IPS面板明显偏离了理想的颜色，尤其是灰度，在8468K的色温下太冷。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27 ms rise
54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

视角稳定的IPS显示屏并没有为户外使用提供特别高的亮度水平。由于屏幕上的强烈反射，在阳光直射下，可读性变得很困难。另一方面，Honor Pad 8可以在阴暗处很好地使用。

性能 -Honor Pad 8，配备骁龙680处理器

Honor Pad 8配备了骁龙680芯片，它有6GB的LPDDR4X内存。其阿德雷诺610集成在SoC中，负责图形处理。

八核处理器帮助Honor Pad 8实现了稳固的系统速度，但并没有将这台平板电脑变成一匹赛马。在日常使用中，操作基本流畅，但不时出现小的卡顿。几个打开的应用程序可能会将Honor 推到极限，这取决于应用程序。如果游戏运行流畅，这通常是由于图形细节方面的妥协。

类似配置的平板电脑迫使Honor Pad 8在合成基准测试中占据较低的位置。这款平板电脑三星Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G和联想Tab P11 Plus在性能方面与评测样本最接近，但它们总体上要快一些。淘宝网上的 Apple iPad 2021和小米Pad 5在性能方面要高得多。由于采用有些过时的Adreno 610 GPU，在图形基准测试中与竞争对手的差距甚至更大。

Honor Pad在网上冲浪时感觉很快，因为网页加载很快，显示也很迅速。浏览器基准测试也证明了该平板电脑的坚实性能，将其置于三星的Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G和联想的Tab P11 Plus之间。由于UFS 2.2存储的高顺序读取性能，应用程序的加载速度相当快。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 2021	1328 Points +252%
Xiaomi Pad 5	784 Points +108%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	656 Points +74%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	503 Points +33%
Honor Pad 8	377 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (323 - 386, n=15)	374 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 2021	3235 Points +113%
Xiaomi Pad 5	2768 Points +82%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	1885 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1287 - 1738, n=15)	1585 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	1557 Points +2%
Honor Pad 8	1522 Points

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021	622382 Points +127%
Xiaomi Pad 5	575553 Points +110%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	356422 Points +30%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	322048 Points +18%
Honor Pad 8	274001 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (201810 - 274001, n=6)	229317 Points -16%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 5	11318 Points +70%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	8897 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	8346 Points +25%
Honor Pad 8	6655 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4535 - 8730, n=15)	6633 Points 0%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad 2021	842 Points +107%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points +90%
Xiaomi Pad 5	635 Points +56%
Honor Pad 8	407 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (325 - 413, n=8)	374 Points -8%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 5	5154 Points +97%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	3608 Points +38%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	2948 Points +12%
Honor Pad 8	2621 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2444 - 2738, n=8)	2581 Points -2%
Apple iPad 2021	Points -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 5	8805 Points +51%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	7162 Points +23%
Honor Pad 8	5817 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5521 - 5852, n=8)	5716 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	4273 Points -27%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5	5788 Points +72%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	4637 Points +38%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	3632 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2742 - 3824, n=8)	3376 Points 0%
Honor Pad 8	3361 Points
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5	10293 Points +391%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points +337%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	4022 Points +92%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	3647 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1994 - 2183, n=8)	2134 Points +2%
Honor Pad 8	2098 Points
Web
Xiaomi Pad 5	1346 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	1283 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	1273 Points +11%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +10%
Honor Pad 8	1151 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (917 - 1199, n=8)	1077 Points -6%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Pad 5	46413 Points +885%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	45392 Points +864%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	13053 Points +177%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4320 - 4995, n=5)	4747 Points +1%
Honor Pad 8	4710 Points
Apple iPad 2021	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	8436 Points +82%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	5938 Points +28%
Honor Pad 8	4627 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4150 - 4853, n=6)	4405 Points -5%

Legend

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD

Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G

Average of class Tablet

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	1872 Points +1434%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	970 Points +695%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	381 Points +212%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	334 Points +174%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	1992 Points +1520%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	985 Points +701%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	380 Points +209%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	330 Points +168%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	123 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	7858 Points +1666%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3436 Points +672%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1387 Points +212%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1099 Points +147%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	445 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	7457 Points +1568%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3428 Points +667%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1344 Points +201%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1101 Points +146%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8661 Points +302%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4058 Points +89%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3128 Points +45%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2152 Points
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12007 Points +493%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4283 Points +111%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3057 Points +51%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2026 Points
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4385 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3578 Points +30%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3438 Points +25%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2750 Points
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6981 Points +415%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	5362 Points +295%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2938 Points +117%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2694 Points +99%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1356 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	9773 Points +725%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8202 Points +593%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2738 Points +131%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2473 Points +109%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1184 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4590 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3523 Points +28%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3375 Points +23%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2751 Points
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	2078 Points -24%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5000 Points +295%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2684 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2573 Points +103%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1265 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6876 Points +517%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2603 Points +133%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2431 Points +118%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1115 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2811 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2774 Points +16%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2558 Points +7%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2389 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2703 Points +102%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2483 Points +85%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1341 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2537 Points +116%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2374 Points +102%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1174 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3462 Points +29%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3183 Points +19%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2679 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3844 Points +85%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3374 Points +62%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2081 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3945 Points +102%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3472 Points +77%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1957 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3425 Points +28%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3283 Points +23%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2675 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +220%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +71%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	58 fps +66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	44 fps +26%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	307 fps +649%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	184 fps +349%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	78 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	55 fps +34%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +242%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +216%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	43 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	25 fps +32%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	167 fps +659%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +395%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	48 fps +118%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	43 fps +95%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	57 fps +338%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +208%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	16 fps +23%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	110 fps +633%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +420%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	32 fps +113%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	29 fps +93%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	43 fps +497%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps +247%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	16 fps +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	9.8 fps +36%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.2 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	69 fps +731%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +466%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps +117%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps +117%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	35 fps +614%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +247%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps +104%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.7 fps +37%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.9 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	31 fps +869%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +463%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.3 fps +128%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.7 fps +109%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	50 fps +495%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +210%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	17 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps +19%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	82 fps +754%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +390%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	19 fps +98%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	19 fps +98%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.6 fps

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	142.2 Points +204%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points +138%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	73 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	55.3 Points +18%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	46.797 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (35.7 - 63.1, n=8)	45.8 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)	35.48 Points -24%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	291.1 Points +269%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	128.1 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	93.4 Points +18%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	78.919 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (69 - 78.9, n=3)	73 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)	70.6 Points -11%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	202 Points +189%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	155.2 Points +122%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	96 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	83 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (58 - 94, n=7)	71.6 Points +2%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	70 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)	55 Points -21%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	171 runs/min +322%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min +201%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	61.3 runs/min +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (32.7 - 65.3, n=8)	43.4 runs/min +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	43.09 runs/min +6%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	40.54 runs/min
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)	31.4 runs/min -23%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	47288 Points +242%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points +112%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	28456 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	17823 Points +29%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)	16947 Points +23%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	13831 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6358 - 15553, n=12)	11775 Points -15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2461 - 3461, n=7)	3029 ms * -5%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	2873.8 ms *
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)	2793 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)	2403 ms * +16%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	1603 ms * +44%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	545 ms * +81%

* ... smaller is better

	Honor Pad 8	Lenovo Tab P11 Plus	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G	Xiaomi Pad 5	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-46%	-9%	11%	-10%	6%
Sequential Read 256KB	833.56	503 -40%	861 3%	1459 75%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -13%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 25%
Sequential Write 256KB	708.51	205.5 -71%	512 -28%	534 -25%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) -26%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -3%
Random Read 4KB	189.57	112.6 -41%	192 1%	208.7 10%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) 1%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 0%
Random Write 4KB	186.95	126.1 -33%	167.5 -10%	158.9 -15%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -1%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 2%

游戏--弱小的GPU是个煞风景的东西

Honor Pad 8通过总共8个扬声器为游戏提供了强大的环绕声。相比之下，它的图形性能并不完全令人激动。因为Adreno 610不是很强大，你必须在大量的游戏中调低细节。

PUBG移动版正是在没有任何提示的情况下自行完成的，因为可以为这款战术射击游戏选择的最大图形设置是 "平衡/中等"。即使如此，《PUBG Mobile》在平均每秒25帧的情况下运行也不是很流畅。在图形更简单的Armajet中，情况看起来更好，平板电脑可以充分利用其每秒60帧的最大帧率。

帧率是用我们的Gamebench测试工具确定。

Honor Pad 8; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.6 (54-60)

Honor Pad 8; PUBG Mobile; 2.2.0: Ø24.8 (20-26)

排放 - 强烈的环绕声

温度

在我们的测试中，Honor Pad 8在任何时候都保持低温。即使经过一小时的压力测试，表面也只升温到最高33.3℃，这甚至不是温热的。

在内部，SoC的温度保持在绿色范围内。正如3DMark Wild Life压力测试所显示的那样，即使经过多次运行，这款平板电脑仍然可以利用其几乎百分之百的性能。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.67-2.68)

Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.5 (38.7-44.5)

Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.09 (8.08-8.11)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.737 (0.728-0.748)

Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø10.7 (10.6-12.2)

Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.31 (2.28-2.31)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)

Max. Load

Idle


30.9 °C	33.3 °C	28.1 °C
30.1 °C	29.4 °C	27.5 °C
28.9 °C	27.9 °C	27.1 °C

Maximum: 33.3 °C
Average: 29.2 °C


28.7 °C	33.1 °C	31.2 °C
28.5 °C	30.4 °C	30.8 °C
27.9 °C	29 °C	29.5 °C

Maximum: 33.1 °C
Average: 29.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

与DTS:X Ultra兼容的扬声器系统是Honor Pad 8的亮点之一。共有8个声膜平均分布在平板电脑的两个短边上。4个扬声器开口的后面各有一对高音扬声器和一对低音扬声器。

扬声器系统产生的声音是平衡而有力的。与许多其他智能手机和平板电脑的扬声器相比，在声音组合中出现了均匀的低音音调。声音设置中的工厂启用的DTS:X Ultra放大了环绕声，并能通过音乐、电影或游戏等配置文件自动适应正在播放的声音。

要将有线音频设备连接到Honor Pad 8，可能需要一个USB-C适配器。蓝牙5.1是无线的。支持常见的蓝牙编解码器，如aptX和aptX HD。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor Pad 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 节俭的Honor 平板电脑

消耗功率

Honor Honor Pad 8配备了7250毫安时的电池，可以用高达22.5瓦的功率充电。附带的电源适配器提供完全相同的功率。在测试中，该平板电脑在关闭时从0到100%的充电时间为1：59小时。不支持无线充电。

Honor Pad 8的耗电量一直很低。它需要的电量明显低于对比设备，特别是在空转和适度负载的情况下。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.1 / 1.5 / 2.1 Watt
Load	4.4 / 7.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Apple iPad 2021 8686 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 Plus 7700 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh
Power Consumption		-172%	-13%	-129%	-80%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	1.3 -18%	1.4 -27%	1.06 4%	0.99 10%
Idle Average *	1.5	7.5 -400%	1.6 -7%	6.25 -317%	4.2 -180%
Idle Maximum *	2.1	7.58 -261%	1.9 10%	6.3 -200%	4.22 -101%
Load Average *	4.4	10.03 -128%	5.3 -20%	8.76 -99%	7.88 -79%
Load Maximum *	7.2	10.91 -52%	8.7 -21%	9.54 -33%	10.63 -48%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø4.56 (2.69-7.24)

Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic: Ø7.02 (2.66-13.2)

Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T: Ø3.96 (2.19-8.76)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G: Ø5.04 (2.24-8.47)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860: Ø5.81 (2.06-10.2)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.44 (3.56-4.75)

Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (6.88-12.6)

Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.95 (4.61-5.32)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.12 (1.975-5.8)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.83 (4-8.78)

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.232 (1.132-1.477)

Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.87 (2.83-2.97)

Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.477 (1.407-1.59)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.38 (2.32-2.86)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.88 (1.838-2.2)

电池寿命

尽管Honor Pad 8的7250毫安时电池比许多对手的电池小，但它在电池寿命方面保持得非常好。模拟网络浏览持续时间刚刚超过12小时，视频播放约14小时。这使Honor ，在相同的运行时间联盟中与Apple的iPad 2021和联想的Tab P11 Plus.

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		40h 48min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 45min

	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Apple iPad 2021 8686 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 Plus 7700 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh
Battery Runtime		6%	-3%	36%	10%
Reader / Idle	2448	2292 -6%	1798 -27%	2485 2%	2641 8%
H.264	838	898 7%	993 18%	1249 49%	1000 19%
WiFi v1.3	733	805 10%	814 11%	1020 39%	733 0%
Load	225	253 12%	194 -14%	342 52%	257 14%

Pros

+ 12英寸IPS显示屏

+ 轻巧的铝制机身

+ Android 12和生产力功能

+ 8个扬声器的强大音效

+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 只有60Hz

- 几乎没有任何性能储备

- 没有主动笔输入

- 中等的系统性能

- 没有GPS，没有移动电话的选项

- 无内存扩展可能

- 没有IP认证

对Honor Pad 8的评价

Honor 已经通过Pad 8实现了一个坚实的平板电脑首秀。如果你正在寻找一款中端，同时又尽可能大又尽可能便宜的设备， "的12英寸平板电脑是合适的人选，因为目前在这个外形尺寸中没有更便宜的替代品。

Pad 8还以其轻巧和高质量的外壳以及良好的电池寿命、8个扬声器的环绕声和DRM Widevine L1的流媒体高清内容（来自Netflix & Co.

Android Honor

Honor Pad 8是一款非常实惠的12英寸平板电脑，但在设备方面有点过于吝啬了

集成在Magic UI 6.1中的生产力功能，如同时显示多个应用程序，可以在大型IPS屏幕上很好地使用。然而，全部功能只适用于使用兼容的智能手机的用户。在其他方面也没有充分利用生产力方面的功能。例如，不支持主动输入笔，制造商也没有提供对接的键盘。

鉴于价格低廉，很明显，，不得不在某些方面偷工减料，如仅限于Wi-Fi 5的Wi-Fi模块，以及缺少microSD插槽。此外，硬件在某些方面有些不足，这在不太明亮的IPS显示屏和SoC方面尤其明显。

该机Honor Honor Honor 骁龙680在Honor Pad 8中使用的Snapdragon 680几乎没有提供任何性能储备，在高要求的应用程序中很快达到极限。没有高于60赫兹的刷新率也可能使一些买家望而却步，特别是由于类似价格的平板电脑，如11英寸和更快的小米Pad 5已经提供了一个120赫兹的显示屏。

Honor Pad 8的替代品包括前面提到的小米Pad 5，以及 Apple iPad 2021和联想Tab P11 Plus.