Teclast M50 Pro 评测200 美元以下的平板电脑

Name: Teclast M50 Pro
Brand: Teclast

真的需要更多吗？

您可以花费数百美元购买Android 平板电脑。就 Teclast M50 Pro 而言，价格还不到 200 美元。尽管价格低廉，这款 10.1 英寸Android 13 平板电脑却提供了令人惊讶的全面功能和稳定的中端性能。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/11/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

中国制造商 Teclast 现在推出了一款价格实惠的Android 平板电脑 M50 Pro。M50 Pro 的官方售价为 199.99 美元，可谓物美价廉。10.1 英寸的 M50 Pro 采用轻质金属外壳，IPS 面板分辨率为 1920 x 1200，标称亮度高达 350 尼特，配备八核Unisoc T616.

除了 8GB 内存和 256GB 内置内存（可通过 microSD 卡扩展）外，M50 Pro 还支持蓝牙 5.1 和 Wi-Fi 5，还可以通过双 SIM 卡插槽连接 LTE 移动网络。1300 万像素主摄像头、500 万像素自拍摄像头和 6000 毫安时电池使其功能更加完善。请继续阅读，看看 M50 Pro 能否在竞争中立于不败之地。

Test device courtesy of Teclast

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast M50 Pro

Processor

Unisoc T7255 (T616) 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4

Display

10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 350 Nits peak brightness, 120 Hz touch sampling rate, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 235 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headphone jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Sensors: Gravity Sensor, Hall Sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/28/38/40/41/66), Dual SIM

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 238.5 x 158.4

Battery

23.1 Wh, 6000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix Main camera (LED Flash, videos up to 1080p@30fps) + 0.3 MP AI-based auxiliary camera
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix videos up to 720p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: quad, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger (5V/2A), USB cable (type A/C), SIM tool, User guide, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

435 g, Power Supply: 41 g

Price

194 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
79.9 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Teclast M50 Pro T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1	435 g	7.9 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
77.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Blackview Tab 12 Pro T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1	430 g	7.4 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81.7 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Honor Pad 8 SD 680, Adreno 610	520 g	6.9 mm	12.00"	2000x1200
81.5 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Telekom T Tablet Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	490 g	7.8 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
81 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	508 g	6.9 mm	10.50"	1920x1200
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	445 g	7.05 mm	10.61"	2000x1200

机箱 - M50 Pro，采用轻质铝制机箱

从外观上看，你根本看不出这款 Teclast 平板电脑的价格低于 200 美元。M50 Pro 的金属机身薄至 7.8 毫米，做工精良，重量仅为 435 克，对于同尺寸的平板电脑来说非常轻巧。背面的金属表面只在 1300 万像素主摄像头上方有一条几乎横跨整个平板电脑宽度的窄塑料带。在 IPS 显示屏上贴有保护膜。

这款 10.1 英寸的平板电脑有一种微妙的绿松石色，名为 "Aqua"，扭动和按压时相对不费力，但会发出轻微的吱吱声。总的来说，这款平板电脑足够坚固，适合日常使用。不过，它没有获得 IP 认证。

得益于四边宽约 1 厘米的屏幕边框，M50 Pro 的屏占比高达 83%，握在手中非常舒适，不会出现意外输入。500 万像素自拍摄像头毫不突兀地嵌入边框。

尺寸比较

Honor Pad 8 Xiaomi Redmi Pad Telekom T Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Teclast M50 Pro Blackview Tab 12 Pro DIN A5 ❌

设备 - Teclast 平板电脑配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间

M50 Pro 拥有 8GB LPDDR4 内存和 256GB eMMC 5.1 闪存，内存配置相当丰富。通过 microSD 插槽可将存储容量增加到 1 TB。 Android 在 256 GB 的存储空间中，13 GB 和预装的应用程序占用了 21 GB，剩下 235 GB 的可用空间。

Teclast 宣称有 16 GB 内存，但这只是数据存储中交换文件形式的扩展，其工作速度比内存慢得多，因此只有在特殊情况下才能提供真正的附加值。

平板电脑的 USB-C 端口以 USB 2.0 的速度工作，并支持 USB OTG。此外，还有一个 3.5 毫米插孔和四个扬声器，其中两个分别分布在两个短边。Teclast 没有在 M50 Pro 中安装 NFC 模块。

microSD 读卡器

M50 Pro 的 microSD 卡插槽与我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡一起实现了 27 MB/s 的合理复制速度。在跨平台磁盘测试中，M50 Pro 的速度在同价位产品中也是最快的。如果插入 microSD 卡，则会阻塞第二个 nano-SIM 卡插槽。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	49.18 MB/s +78%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	27.6 MB/s
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	17.02 MB/s -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	9.48 MB/s -66%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	7.61 MB/s -72%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø26.6 (11.8-45.4)

Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.8 (29.9-49.6)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.5 (25.2-50.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (6.67-45.8)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.6 (41.9-85.8)

Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.4 (48.9-82)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø68.7 (14-80.3)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.1 (7.54-78.5)

软件 -Android 13 无臃肿软件

Teclast M50 Pro 基本运行Android 13，因此既没有安装第三方应用程序，也没有安装 Teclast 自己的工具。该平板电脑支持 DRM Widevine L1，因此可以播放高清质量的流媒体。

在审查时（2023 年 9 月底），Android 安全补丁是从 2023 年 7 月开始的，因此不再是完全最新的。目前还不清楚 Teclast 将在多长时间内为其平板电脑提供Android 更新。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - LTE 双卡双待

M50 Pro 可以通过 2G、3G 和 LTE 建立手机连接。频率覆盖范围不是很大，但不会造成任何接收问题，至少在欧洲不会。支持 VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话。

Teclast 平板电脑还可通过蓝牙 5.0 和 Wi-Fi 5 进行无线通信。在 Wi-Fi 方面，它通过华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器实现了稳定的传输速率，峰值达到 372 MBit/s。

Networking
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	319 (min: 259) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	358 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼96%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	309 (min: 300) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	367 (min: 357) MBit/s ∼99%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	345 (min: 326) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	357 (min: 323) MBit/s ∼96%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	371 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	372 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	325 (min: 163) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	349 (min: 178) MBit/s ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	367 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼99%

Teclast M50 Pro Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (259-336)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (163-328)

Teclast M50 Pro Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (316-374)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (178-357)

M50 Pro 可通过 GPS（L1）、Glonass（L1）、北斗（B1、B1C）和伽利略（E1）卫星系统进行定位。在室内，定位时间稍长，精度也不高，只有 15 米。在室外，平板电脑获取信号的速度更快，定位精度为 3 米。

为了测试平板电脑的实际跟踪能力，我们将其与 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表一起进行了一次短途自行车骑行测试，以作比较。M50 Pro 在这里出现了一些误差，但证明它总体上非常适合导航任务。

摄像头 - 1300 万像素摄像头和深度传感器

M50 Pro 的背面是一个 1300 万像素的摄像头，配有 LED 闪光灯。虽然有两个镜头，但更里面的镜头只是一个深度传感器。它的分辨率为 30 万像素，平板电脑使用它来收集额外的数据，以便在拍摄人像时实现虚化/模糊效果。

由于动态范围较低，1300 万像素摄像头拍摄的照片会显得相当暗淡。对于亮部和暗部都非常明显的物体来说，相机的拍摄尤其困难，因为有时背景会消失得无影无踪。在最佳照明条件下，主摄像头能适当地呈现图像细节，但放大时总会出现图像噪点。在弱光环境下的拍摄效果相当不错。

视频的画质与照片相似，最高可录制 30 帧/秒的 1080p 视频。其他支持的分辨率有 30 fps 的 720p 和 30 fps 的 480p。

自拍摄像头的分辨率为 500 万像素，在我们的测试中没有给人留下深刻印象。即使在光线充足的情况下，人像照片也显得苍白、有颗粒感和失焦。自拍摄像头最多可录制 30 帧/秒的 720p 视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在全棚照明下，主相机相对准确地再现了 ColorChecker 测试图的色彩。白平衡最好，而色彩与参考色彩的偏差较大。即使在最佳照明条件下，主相机也不能非常清晰地捕捉测试图。

配件和保修 - 10 瓦电源装置包含在供货范围内

M50 Pro 的供货范围包括一个 10 瓦模块化电源、一条 USB 电缆（A 型至 C 型）、一个 SIM 卡工具、一张保修卡和一份快速入门指南。Teclast 还提供一个对开式保护套（约 15 美元），可同时作为平板电脑的保护盖和支架。

Teclast 为 M50 Pro 提供 12 个月的保修服务。保修期可能因国家而异，因此感兴趣的买家在购买前应仔细确认。

输入设备和操作 - 2D 面部解锁，但无指纹传感器

Teclast M50 Pro 的 IPS 面板可快速实现输入。该平板电脑的精确触摸屏的触摸采样率为 120 Hz，刷新率为 60 Hz，在同类产品中属于典型水平。

M50 Pro 没有指纹识别器。相反，平板电脑可以通过图案、PIN 码或密码解锁。你也可以使用唯一的生物识别认证选项--二维面部扫描。登录需要一秒钟时间，但效果可靠。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 16:10 面板，60 赫兹

Teclast M50 Pro 的 10.1 英寸 IPS 面板分辨率为 1920 x 1200，符合 16:10 格式。该平板电脑没有亮度传感器。

M50 Pro 的亮度与 Teclast 标称的 350 尼特相差甚远。虽然在我们的测试中，该面板能产生高对比度的显示效果，但其平均亮度为 233.7 cd/m²，最大亮度为 252 cd/m²，比标称亮度低约 100 nits。与同类产品相比，M50 Pro 的亮度远远不及其他平板电脑，因此建议将其作为室内平板电脑使用。

M50 Pro 不使用 PWM 进行亮度控制，因此适合敏感用户使用。


245 cd/m²	252 cd/m²	230 cd/m²
229 cd/m²	248 cd/m²	224 cd/m²
221 cd/m²	237 cd/m²	217 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 252 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 233.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 248 cd/m²
Contrast: 1240:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.327

	Teclast M50 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Blackview Tab 12 Pro IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Honor Pad 8 IPS, 2000x1200, 12"	Telekom T Tablet TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6"
Screen		-29%	13%	-17%	-23%	36%
Brightness middle	248	371 50%	379 53%	529 113%	368 48%	418 69%
Brightness	234	348 49%	382 63%	486 108%	346 48%	402 72%
Brightness Distribution	86	82 -5%	84 -2%	87 1%	91 6%	90 5%
Black Level *	0.2	0.48 -140%	0.3 -50%	0.56 -180%	0.61 -205%	0.28 -40%
Contrast	1240	773 -38%	1263 2%	945 -24%	603 -51%	1493 20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.3	8.6 -62%	4.76 10%	9.6 -81%	6.9 -30%	2.3 57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.95	15.4 -29%	9.25 23%	14.4 -21%	11.4 5%	5.4 55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.1	11.3 -59%	6.7 6%	10.5 -48%	7.7 -8%	3.7 48%
Gamma	2.327 ^95%	2.04 ^108%	2.234 ^98%	2.17 ^101%	2.16 ^102%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	8112 ^80%	9728 ^67%	8468 ^77%	10482 ^62%	8547 ^76%	6595 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列

在显示设置中，色彩和对比度既可以手动调节，也可以自动调节。当选择自动对比度并将色温设置为暖色时，M50 Pro 的画质最佳。8000 K 以上的色温还是有点过高，但其他设备在这方面也没有更好的表现。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于面板亮度不太高，Teclast M50 Pro 只在有限的范围内适合户外使用。由于反射强烈，即使在阴暗处，有时也很难从视角稳定的屏幕上读取内容。

性能 - 配备 Unisoc T616 的 M50 Pro

Teclast M50 Pro 配有 8GB LPDDR4 内存，以及Unisoc T616及其 ARM Mali G57 MP1。这款八核 SoC 于 2019 年上市，可流畅运行日常应用程序，并确保基本无延迟运行。Unisoc T616 结合了两个主频高达 2 GHz 的 Cortex A75 内核和 6 个主频高达 1.8 GHz 的 Cortex A55 内核。

在合成基准测试中，M50 Pro 的速度与Honor Pad 8一样快，后者使用高通骁龙 680 4G。不过，两者都被电信 T 平板电脑(联发科 Dimensity 700)和小米红米平板电脑(联发科 Helio G99).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +96%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	558 Points +55%
Honor Pad 8	377 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	365 Points +1%
Teclast M50 Pro	360 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (298 - 380, n=7)	351 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1889 Points +29%
Honor Pad 8	1522 Points +4%
Teclast M50 Pro	1469 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1184 - 1502, n=7)	1410 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1229 Points -16%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	316212 Points +37%
Honor Pad 8	274001 Points +19%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	238808 Points +4%
Teclast M50 Pro	230647 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (228124 - 235075, n=4)	230591 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	201310 Points -13%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9475 Points +18%
Telekom T Tablet	8329 Points +3%
Teclast M50 Pro	8055 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (7936 - 8066, n=6)	8004 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	7447 Points -8%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	6859 Points -15%
Honor Pad 8	6655 Points -17%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	575 Points +47%
Telekom T Tablet	534 Points +37%
Honor Pad 8	407 Points +4%
Teclast M50 Pro	390 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (382 - 394, n=4)	388 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	361 Points -7%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	355 Points -9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2988 Points +41%
Telekom T Tablet	2839 Points +34%
Honor Pad 8	2621 Points +23%
Teclast M50 Pro	2126 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2026 - 2182, n=4)	2095 Points -1%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	1954 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1839 Points -13%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	6509 Points +31%
Honor Pad 8	5817 Points +17%
Teclast M50 Pro	4969 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (4795 - 5151, n=4)	4969 Points 0%
Telekom T Tablet	4934 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	4729 Points -5%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	4332 Points -13%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points +60%
Telekom T Tablet	3923 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	3550 Points +17%
Honor Pad 8	3361 Points +11%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	3095 Points +2%
Teclast M50 Pro	3035 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2632 - 3255, n=4)	2941 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	970 Points -68%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points +699%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2875 Points +150%
Telekom T Tablet	2667 Points +132%
Honor Pad 8	2098 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	2001 Points +74%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1137 - 1173, n=4)	1151 Points 0%
Teclast M50 Pro	1148 Points
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	989 Points -14%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +7%
Telekom T Tablet	1258 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1246 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1201 Points +2%
Teclast M50 Pro	1181 Points
Honor Pad 8	1151 Points -3%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (1096 - 1181, n=4)	1148 Points -3%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	1123 Points -5%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +2355%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	892 Points +200%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (292 - 321, n=4)	302 Points +2%
Teclast M50 Pro	297 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points +292%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9213 Points +219%
Telekom T Tablet	9056 Points +213%
Honor Pad 8	4627 Points +60%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	3748 Points +30%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2817 - 4209, n=5)	3157 Points +9%
Teclast M50 Pro	2892 Points

Legend

Teclast M50 Pro Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Blackview Tab 12 Pro Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Average Unisoc T7255 (T616)

Average of class Tablet

在图形测试中，M50 Pro 和Honor Pad 8然而，由于其 GPU 性能更强，Telekom T Tablet 电信 T 平板电脑和小米红米平板电脑的领先优势要比合成基准测试大得多。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	329 Points +159%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	318 Points +150%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	179 Points +41%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	127 Points
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 Points -4%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	121 Points -5%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	343 Points +168%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	326 Points +155%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	184 Points +44%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	128 Points
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	123 Points -4%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	113 Points -12%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1215 Points +155%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1171 Points +146%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	708 Points +49%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	476 Points
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	445 Points -7%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	404 Points -15%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1237 Points +159%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1173 Points +146%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	712 Points +49%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	477 Points
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -6%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	414 Points -13%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2644 Points +139%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2511 Points +127%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1463 Points +32%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1356 Points +23%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1106 Points
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	976 Points -12%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2442 Points +161%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2321 Points +148%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1284 Points +37%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1184 Points +26%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	937 Points
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	825 Points -12%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3717 Points +24%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3516 Points +17%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3001 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2865 Points -5%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2751 Points -8%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2637 Points -12%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	55 fps +139%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	51 fps +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps +70%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps +52%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	23 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps +163%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	61 fps +154%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +71%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps +71%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps +119%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps +56%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +19%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps +150%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps +138%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps +63%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +38%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps +137%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps +137%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +55%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +34%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +158%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +147%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +55%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +55%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +124%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +107%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps +59%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.2 fps +24%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +154%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +154%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps +64%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps +41%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.9 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps +121%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps +118%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps +58%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.9 fps +29%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.8 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps +145%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.6 fps +64%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps +45%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.2 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +100%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.9 fps +65%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps +40%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps +130%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps +64%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.6 fps +57%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.4 fps +145%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps +124%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1.4 fps +43%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.98 fps
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	fps -100%

使用 Teclast 平板电脑，您可以快速上网。因此，浏览器基准测试证明了 M50 Pro 在这方面的良好性能，使其能够无缝地融入其他测试领域。由于浏览器版本较新，它几乎总是名列前茅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points +94%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	58.17 Points +2%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	57.176 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	55.842 Points -2%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (45.4 - 57.2, n=5)	52 Points -9%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115)	48.464 Points -15%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	46.797 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	43.98 Points -23%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points +88%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	57 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	56 Points -2%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	56 Points -2%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (45 - 60, n=4)	55 Points -4%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115)	51 Points -11%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	48 Points -16%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	155.2 Points +80%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	86 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	84 Points -2%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (68 - 86, n=3)	78 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	75 Points -13%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	70 Points -19%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min +162%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	46.6 runs/min
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	40.54 runs/min -13%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (34.4 - 46.6, n=5)	40.4 runs/min -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	38.1 runs/min -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	33.35 runs/min -28%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points +98%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	21843 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	17557 Points +18%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	14855 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (12141 - 15304, n=5)	14092 Points -5%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	13831 Points -7%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115)	12642 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	10787 Points -27%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -48%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115)	3186.8 ms * -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	3060 ms * -21%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	2873.8 ms * -14%
Average Unisoc T7255 (T616) (2531 - 3014, n=4)	2711 ms * -7%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	2530.7 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	2443.7 ms * +3%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	2194.9 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast 为 M50 Pro 使用了 eMMC 闪存，但由于其设计原因，只能实现较低的传输速率。在日常使用中，偶尔会出现应用程序加载时间较长的情况。一些竞争对手在这方面的速度也不快。

	Teclast M50 Pro	Blackview Tab 12 Pro	Honor Pad 8	Telekom T Tablet	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Pad	Average 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		62%	180%	-13%	-25%	255%	-5%	199%
Sequential Read 256KB	257.8	512.71 99%	833.56 223%	287.1 11%	255.1 -1%	976.9 279%	272 ?(240 - 297, n=5) 6%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 305%
Sequential Write 256KB	225.22	196.44 -13%	708.51 215%	188.3 -16%	101.1 -55%	883.6 292%	221 ?(149.5 - 253, n=5) -2%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 205%
Random Read 4KB	91.95	129.56 41%	189.57 106%	52.8 -43%	68.3 -26%	250.82 173%	81.3 ?(61.7 - 100, n=5) -12%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 106%
Random Write 4KB	68.13	149.89 120%	186.95 174%	66.55 -2%	57.5 -16%	257.02 277%	61 ?(9.4 - 92.2, n=5) -10%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 179%

游戏 - 当前游戏的运行受到限制

M50 Pro 可通过四个扬声器以立体声运行游戏。不过，为了让《PUBG Mobile》等当前游戏能流畅运行，你往往不得不降低细节。遗憾的是，由于 Teclast 平板电脑拒绝向我们的Gamebench测试工具提供相应的 FPS 数据。

排放物 - 带立体声的酷平板电脑

温度

M50 Pro 在使用过程中保持凉爽，在长时间负载的情况下也不会明显发热，因此在任何时候都能保持舒适的触感。平板电脑的内部散热也得到了很好的控制。3DMark Wild Life 压力测试显示，我们的测试设备在渲染 20 次测试场景后，性能仅略有下降。

Max. Load

Idle


29.5 °C	33.9 °C	28.8 °C
28.8 °C	29 °C	27.8 °C
28.5 °C	27.8 °C	27.3 °C

Maximum: 33.9 °C
Average: 29 °C


29.5 °C	31.5 °C	29.9 °C
28.6 °C	29.8 °C	29.1 °C
28.4 °C	28.2 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 31.5 °C
Average: 29.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.86-2.87)

Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.5 (2.49-2.52)

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.67-2.68)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.39-7.47)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.783 (0.733-0.822)

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.737 (0.728-0.748)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.03-2.07)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	99.2 (1.091^min - 1.101^max) % +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	97.9 (2.03^min - 2.07^max) % +10%
Honor Pad 8	97.3 (0.728^min - 0.748^max) % +9%
Teclast M50 Pro	89.2 (0.733^min - 0.822^max) %
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	% -100%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 8	99.7 (2.67^min - 2.68^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	99.6 (4.25^min - 4.27^max) % 0%
Telekom T Tablet	99.6 (7.07^min - 7.1^max) % 0%
Teclast M50 Pro	99.6 (2.86^min - 2.87^max) %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	99 (7.39^min - 7.47^max) % -1%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	98.9 (2.49^min - 2.52^max) % -1%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Telekom T Tablet	99.5 (6.99^min - 7.03^max) %

Legend

Teclast M50 Pro Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Blackview Tab 12 Pro Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

发言人

M50 Pro 通过 4 个扬声器为用户提供立体声音效。音质总体不错，但整个音域的音量相对较小，低音几乎完全没有。

外置音频设备可通过蓝牙 5.0 或 3.5 毫米插孔与平板电脑连接。支持的蓝牙编解码器包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD 和 LDAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast M50 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 6000 mAh 电池，充电时间超过 3 小时

耗电量

Teclast 为 M50 Pro 配备了一个 10 瓦的电源（5V/2A）。在测试中，平板电脑的 6000 毫安时电池在 3:34 小时内完全充满。2:24 小时后电池容量达到 80%，2:43 小时后达到 90%。

制造商没有提供其平板电脑最大充电功率的精确信息。不过，当连接到来自 Ugreen 的 65 瓦电源时，我们可以将 M50 Pro 的充电时间缩短约 15 分钟。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.1 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt
Load	5.5 / 8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh	Blackview Tab 12 Pro 6580 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh
Power Consumption		-28%	2%	-102%	-86%	-54%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	0.98 11%	1.1 -0%	1.28 -16%	1.19 -8%	0.93 15%
Idle Average *	1.4	3 -114%	1.5 -7%	4.52 -223%	4.63 -231%	4.02 -187%
Idle Maximum *	1.9	3.14 -65%	2.1 -11%	4.58 -141%	4.68 -146%	4.07 -114%
Load Average *	5.5	4.19 24%	4.4 20%	10.5 -91%	7.27 -32%	5.52 -0%
Load Maximum *	8	7.73 3%	7.2 10%	11.2 -40%	9.17 -15%	6.89 14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast M50 Pro: Ø4.81 (1.233-8.1)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast M50 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.66 (5.92-7.15)

Teclast M50 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.398 (1.134-1.993)

电池寿命

由于电池容量相对较小，M50 Pro 的电池续航时间只能算一般。无论是模拟网上冲浪，还是连续循环播放我们的测试视频，平板电脑的续航时间都低于 10 小时大关。但实际上，这款平板电脑应该可以使用一到两天才需要充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		27h 40min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 39min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 53min

	Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh	Blackview Tab 12 Pro 6580 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh
Battery Runtime		47%	30%	40%	21%	78%
Reader / Idle	1660		2448 47%		1973 19%	3640 119%
H.264	579		838 45%		824 42%	971 68%
WiFi v1.3	555	817 47%	733 32%	775 40%	679 22%	1057 90%
Load	233		225 -3%		230 -1%	310 33%

Pros

+ 纤薄轻巧的金属机身

+ LTE 双卡双待

+ 大量存储空间

+ Android 13 无臃肿软件

+ 通过 Widevine L1 认证

+ 性能稳定

+ 4 个扬声器

+ 3.5 毫米音频接口

+ 无 PWM

Cons

- 屏幕不太亮

- 电池寿命低于平均水平

- 更新时间不明确

- 无指纹传感器

- 使用 10 瓦电源适配器充电缓慢

对 Teclast M50 Pro 的评价

Teclast M50 Pro 证明，不到 200 美元就能买到不错的Android 平板电脑。在外壳方面，你不会注意到这款 10.1 英寸机型的低价。铝制机身做工扎实，重量只有 435 克，非常轻巧。

Teclast M50 Pro 将满足那些希望购买一款价格便宜但配置齐全的冲浪和多媒体平板电脑的买家的需求。

在我们的测试中，M50 Pro 作为一款冲浪和多媒体平板电脑表现出色。它支持用于高清流媒体的 DRM Widevine L1，有 235 GB 的免费存储空间，配有耳机插孔，支持双卡双待，这意味着您可以在旅途中使用这款平板电脑进行娱乐。

平板电脑的电池续航时间并不突出，但也足够一天的娱乐使用。只要你愿意降低细节要求，即使是要求苛刻的游戏也能在 Teclast 上流畅运行。

在分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素的 IPS 显示屏上，M50 Pro 以 60 Hz 的频率显示内容，亮度也不高。不过，所提供的亮度足以满足室内使用。在室外和阳光充足的地方，平板电脑很快就会不堪重负。软件支持也是负面清单上的一项，因为目前还不清楚 Teclast 打算在多长时间内为Android 13 平板电脑提供更新。此外，该平板电脑的充电速度如果稍快一些，也会有所帮助。

Teclast M50 Pro 的替代产品包括电信 T 平板电脑和小米红米平板电脑.Telekom 平板电脑支持长时间更新，而小米红米平板电脑的性能要高得多。

价格和供应情况

目前，Teclast M50 Pro 的供货量似乎有限。在 Teclast 的网上商店，官方售价为 199.99 美元。.国际买家可点击此处直接进入在其国家销售 Teclast 产品的零售商列表。

Teclast M50 Pro - 10/06/2023 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

79 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

40 / 70 → 56%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 92%

Battery

84%

Display

76%

Games Performance

11 / 78 → 14%

Application Performance

62 / 92 → 67%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

67 / 91 → 74%

Camera

55 / 85 → 65%

Average

70%

80%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.