Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarTeclast T50 Pro 平板电脑评测--移动通信和充足的存储空间，物美价廉
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Teclast T50 Pro Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3 | 480 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.00" | 2000x1200 | |
| 81.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Teclast T50 T616, Mali-G57 MP1 | 510 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 11.00" | 2000x1200 | |
| 81 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2 | 508 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 10.50" | 1920x1200 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 445 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 10.61" | 2000x1200 |
外壳和设备 - 制造不完美
更强的动力总是受欢迎的，不是吗？尤其是以合理的附加费用获得它的时候。Teclast T50 Pro 的价格甚至不到 300 欧元，而且在网上已经有大幅折扣，您还可以获得额外的优惠。
与 Teclast T50的关系不一定一眼就能看出来：虽然 T50 Pro 也有一个稳定的金属外壳，但它的扬声器和按键位置不同，而且背面还有一个带闪光灯和第二个镜头的相机模块。
机身可能会有些扭曲，甚至在一角有些跳开，这降低了质量印象。除此之外，这款平板电脑的制造质量还算不错。尽管屏幕尺寸相同，但它比 Teclast T50 更方便，重量也轻了 30 克。 Teclast T50.
除了用于存储数据的 256 GB UFS 2.2 闪存外，还有 8 GB 工作内存，也不算太紧张。此外，还有一个 microSD 插槽可用于扩展存储空间。这款阅读器的整体速度并不是特别快，但在同价位产品中，它与我们参考的 microSD Angelbird V60 相比还是相当快的。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Teclast T50 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Teclast T50 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 无广告的纯Android
除了充足的存储空间，Teclast 平板电脑还提供一个 SIM 卡插槽，甚至可以通过 4G 网络使用移动互联网。虽然可用的频率不多，但对于欧洲和一些热门旅游目的地来说应该足够了。在几项随机测试中，接收质量还算不错，但与昂贵的智能手机相比，还不在一个档次上。
Teclast T50 Pro 还搭载了 WiFi 5，在我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 进行的测试中，Teclast T50 Pro 的传输速率相当稳定，大约在 300 到 380 MBit/s 之间，这在同类产品中很常见。
平板电脑上安装了 PureAndroid 13，安全补丁是从 2023 年 5 月开始的，因此在测试时还不算太旧。我们无法理解的是，制造商没有对 Widevine 进行认证，而 Teclast T50却通过了认证。因此，目前还无法从主要平台流式传输高清或 4K 内容。幸运的是，没有预装广告软件。
屏幕是 60 Hz 面板，因此操作时不时会感觉有点迟钝，尤其是如果你以前使用过 120 Hz 屏幕的手机等。平板电脑没有指纹传感器，但可以通过面部识别解锁。这种方法非常可靠、快速，但由于使用的是二维数据，所以不是很安全。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
| Teclast T50 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
| Teclast T50 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Teclast T50 | |
照相机 - 现在带闪光灯
虽然 T50 Pro 的相机传感器与 Teclast T50有一个重要区别：现在背面有一个 LED 闪光灯，可以照亮黑暗的场景。背面的深度传感器就不那么重要了。它看起来像第二个摄像头，但只能为人像模糊效果提供额外数据。
背面的 2000 万像素摄像头拍摄的照片相当暗，动态效果相对较少。不过，图像清晰度相当不错，仍能看到一些细节。在光线非常暗的情况下，特别明显的是，摄像头在非常亮和非常暗的区域都过度疲劳。
视频最高可录制 1440p 和 30 fps。自动对焦常常显得力不从心，反应相当缓慢。
前置 800 万像素摄像头用于自拍。在光线充足的情况下，拍摄的照片亮度尚可，但看起来颗粒感较强，细节对比度不足。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
显示屏 - Teclast T50 Pro 的颜色变得更深了
Teclast T50 Pro 的 IPS 显示屏分辨率为 2000 x 1200 像素，略高于全高清标准。遗憾的是，在我们的测试中，屏幕比 Teclast T50的平均亮度仅为 344 cd/m²，难以满足室外使用的要求。
60 Hz 的滚动也不太流畅，但至少我们没有注意到任何 PWM。
在使用分光光度计和软件 CalMAN 进行的测试中，我们还发现了严重的偏蓝现象，这种现象会伪造色彩，使画面更冷。屏幕的对比度也不高。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 347 cd/m²
Contrast: 964:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.009
| Teclast T50 Pro IPS, 2000x1200, 11" | Teclast T50 IPS, 2000x1200, 11" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -15% | -37% | 8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.4 ? | 45.5 ? 2% | 53.6 ? -16% | 38.13 ? 18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22.5 ? | 29.7 ? -32% | 35.6 ? -58% | 22.89 ? -2% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | 17% | -4% | 39% | |
| Brightness middle | 347 | 438 26% | 368 6% | 418 20% |
| Brightness | 344 | 417 21% | 346 1% | 402 17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 85 -8% | 91 -1% | 90 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.5 -39% | 0.61 -69% | 0.28 22% |
| Contrast | 964 | 876 -9% | 603 -37% | 1493 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.06 | 4.37 52% | 6.9 24% | 2.3 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.84 | 7.48 46% | 11.4 18% | 5.4 61% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.3 | 5.3 49% | 7.7 25% | 3.7 64% |
| Gamma | 2.009 110% | 2.322 95% | 2.16 102% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 10599 61% | 7855 83% | 8547 76% | 6595 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
11% | -21% /
-11% | 24% /
33% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率和耐用性
使用 Helio G99Teclast 在这个价位采用了功能强大的 SoC。无论是在 CPU 还是 GPU 基准测试中，其性能都大大超过了 Teclast T50甚至 三星Galaxy Tab A8 2022.红米 红米平板电脑实际上采用的是相同的 SoC，也能提供相当高的性价比。
在日常使用中，你通常可以流畅地浏览 T50 Pro，但 90 Hz 的屏幕肯定会让系统使用起来更加流畅。此外，T50 Pro 还支持更多现代图形 API，因此大多数游戏都能在平板电脑上运行。
在长时间负载情况下，最高温度仅为 35 °C，并不明显。在运行 20 次 3DMark Wild Life 之后，性能也与测试开始时保持在同一水平。
4 个扬声器听起来有点高音偏重，声音也不是特别大，但如果你想听懂视频中的语音或试听流行歌曲，它们已经足够了。不过，要享受真正的音频效果，建议使用可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接的外置扬声器或耳机。后者有许多编解码器可供选择：除了标准的 SBC、AAC、LDAC 和 aptX 外，还有更高质量的变体，如 LHDC 或 aptX HD。
Teclast T50 Pro 配备了 8,000 mAh 电池，电池容量甚至比 T50的电池容量。这是一项了不起的成就。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，T50 Pro 的续航时间也比其便宜的兄弟产品要长得多。我们测得的时间为 17:26 小时，即使在高强度使用的情况下也能轻松维持一天。该设备的充电功率为 18 瓦，需要 3 个多小时才能在电池电量耗尽时显示出 100% 的充电状态。遗憾的是，它不支持无线充电。
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Teclast T50 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=17) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Teclast T50 Pro | Teclast T50 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | Xiaomi Redmi Pad | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -9% | -77% | 3% | -9% | -19% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 962.9 | 920.5 -4% | 255.1 -74% | 976.9 1% | 887 ? -8% | 957 ? -1% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 871 | 713.4 -18% | 101.1 -88% | 883.6 1% | 694 ? -20% | 646 ? -26% |
| Random Read 4KB | 230.7 | 207.1 -10% | 68.3 -70% | 250.82 9% | 228 ? -1% | 185.8 ? -19% |
| Random Write 4KB | 251.6 | 238.1 -5% | 57.5 -77% | 257.02 2% | 238 ? -5% | 178.1 ? -29% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
| Teclast T50 Pro | |
发言人
Teclast T50 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
| Teclast T50 Pro | |
| Teclast T50 | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 1764, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Pros
Cons
结论--价格提示，有改进潜力
Teclast T50 Pro 绝对是一款低于 300 欧元的超值产品。充足的存储空间、LTE 功能和相对较快的处理器确保了这一点。
不过，制造商也有一些令人费解的决定：例如，为什么屏幕比 Teclast T50 Pro 暗得多呢？ Teclast T50?制造商可能需要更新 Widevine 认证，否则无法观看高清流媒体内容。
这款平板电脑相对较轻，但运行时间仍然很好，可以使用纯Android ，没有广告软件，即使在负载情况下也几乎不会发热。总之，Teclast T50 Pro 有很多值得称道之处。
Teclast T50 Pro 价格便宜，但仍能提供移动连接、强大的性能和宽敞快速的内存配置。
如果你想省点钱，可以购买更便宜的 Teclast T50但在内存和性能方面必须做出让步。小米 小米红米平板电脑提供强劲的动力和 90 Hz 的屏幕。
价格和供应情况
Teclast T50 Pro 在AliExpress 的售价约为 224 欧元（约合 224 美元）。.亚马逊（amazon.de）的商店页面已经存在，但尚未激活。根据制造商的说法，这款平板电脑将于 2023 年 8 月底在亚马逊上市。
Teclast T50 Pro
-
07/21/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
