Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast T50 Pro 平板电脑评测--移动通信和充足的存储空间,物美价廉

更轻、更快、更好?

Teclast T50 Pro 据说是 T50 的改进版,我们可以证明它具有良好的性价比。它的价格也不贵,但功率、电池和内存却大大增加。我们将在评测中了解它是否真的物美价廉。
ARM Android Tablet
Teclast T50 Pro
Teclast T50 Pro (T Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP3
Memory
8 GB 
Display
11.00 inch 15:9, 2000 x 1200 pixel 212 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 220 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gyroscope, proximity, hall
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 256 x 160
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix (camera 1), 0,3 MP (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 4 speakers, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
480 g
Price
289 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
83.3 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Teclast T50 Pro
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3
480 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.00"2000x1200
81.8 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Teclast T50
T7255, Mali-G57 MP1
510 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash11.00"2000x1200
81 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
508 g32 GB eMMC Flash10.50"1920x1200
84.6 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
445 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash10.61"2000x1200

外壳和设备 - 制造不完美

更强的动力总是受欢迎的,不是吗?尤其是以合理的附加费用获得它的时候。Teclast T50 Pro 的价格甚至不到 300 欧元,而且在网上已经有大幅折扣,您还可以获得额外的优惠。

Teclast T50的关系不一定一眼就能看出来:虽然 T50 Pro 也有一个稳定的金属外壳,但它的扬声器和按键位置不同,而且背面还有一个带闪光灯和第二个镜头的相机模块。

机身可能会有些扭曲,甚至在一角有些跳开,这降低了质量印象。除此之外,这款平板电脑的制造质量还算不错。尽管屏幕尺寸相同,但它比 Teclast T50 更方便,重量也轻了 30 克。 Teclast T50.

除了用于存储数据的 256 GB UFS 2.2 闪存外,还有 8 GB 工作内存,也不算太紧张。此外,还有一个 microSD 插槽可用于扩展存储空间。这款阅读器的整体速度并不是特别快,但在同价位产品中,它与我们参考的 microSD Angelbird V60 相比还是相当快的。

Teclast T50 Pro
Teclast T50 Pro
Teclast T50 Pro
Teclast T50 Pro

尺寸比较

260 mm 164 mm 9.7 mm 510 g256 mm 160 mm 7.5 mm 480 g250.38 mm 157.98 mm 7.05 mm 445 g246.8 mm 161.9 mm 6.9 mm 508 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s +98%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.1 MB/s +37%
Teclast T50 Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
24.9 MB/s
Teclast T50
  (Angelbird V60)
22.2 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
9.48 MB/s -62%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Teclast T50 Pro Mali-G57 MP3, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø33 (8.33-44.2)
Teclast T50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.6 (16.4-43.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (6.67-45.8)
Teclast T50 Pro Mali-G57 MP3, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.2 (40.7-77.7)
Teclast T50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø63.2 (32.6-85.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.1 (7.54-78.5)

通信、软件和操作 - 无广告的纯Android

除了充足的存储空间,Teclast 平板电脑还提供一个 SIM 卡插槽,甚至可以通过 4G 网络使用移动互联网。虽然可用的频率不多,但对于欧洲和一些热门旅游目的地来说应该足够了。在几项随机测试中,接收质量还算不错,但与昂贵的智能手机相比,还不在一个档次上。

Teclast T50 Pro 还搭载了 WiFi 5,在我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 进行的测试中,Teclast T50 Pro 的传输速率相当稳定,大约在 300 到 380 MBit/s 之间,这在同类产品中很常见。

平板电脑上安装了 PureAndroid 13,安全补丁是从 2023 年 5 月开始的,因此在测试时还不算太旧。我们无法理解的是,制造商没有对 Widevine 进行认证,而 Teclast T50却通过了认证。因此,目前还无法从主要平台流式传输高清或 4K 内容。幸运的是,没有预装广告软件。

屏幕是 60 Hz 面板,因此操作时不时会感觉有点迟钝,尤其是如果你以前使用过 120 Hz 屏幕的手机等。平板电脑没有指纹传感器,但可以通过面部识别解锁。这种方法非常可靠、快速,但由于使用的是二维数据,所以不是很安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Teclast T50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
370 (351min - 379max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (179min - 379max) MBit/s 0%
Teclast T50 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (356min - 382max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s -5%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (358min - 370max) MBit/s +8%
Teclast T50 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
340 (288min - 351max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s -4%
Teclast T50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
313 (298min - 325max) MBit/s -8%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Teclast T50 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø340 (288-351)
Teclast T50 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-382)

照相机 - 现在带闪光灯

前置摄像头拍摄的照片
前置摄像头拍摄的照片

虽然 T50 Pro 的相机传感器与 Teclast T50有一个重要区别:现在背面有一个 LED 闪光灯,可以照亮黑暗的场景。背面的深度传感器就不那么重要了。它看起来像第二个摄像头,但只能为人像模糊效果提供额外数据。

背面的 2000 万像素摄像头拍摄的照片相当暗,动态效果相对较少。不过,图像清晰度相当不错,仍能看到一些细节。在光线非常暗的情况下,特别明显的是,摄像头在非常亮和非常暗的区域都过度疲劳。

视频最高可录制 1440p 和 30 fps。自动对焦常常显得力不从心,反应相当缓慢。

前置 800 万像素摄像头用于自拍。在光线充足的情况下,拍摄的照片亮度尚可,但看起来颗粒感较强,细节对比度不足。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T50 Pro: 15.26 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 22.28 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
89.7 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T50 Pro: 46.64 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 89.72 ∆E

显示屏 - Teclast T50 Pro 的颜色变得更深了

子像素结构
子像素结构

Teclast T50 Pro 的 IPS 显示屏分辨率为 2000 x 1200 像素,略高于全高清标准。遗憾的是,在我们的测试中,屏幕比 Teclast T50的平均亮度仅为 344 cd/m²,难以满足室外使用的要求。

60 Hz 的滚动也不太流畅,但至少我们没有注意到任何 PWM。

在使用分光光度计和软件 CalMAN 进行的测试中,我们还发现了严重的偏蓝现象,这种现象会伪造色彩,使画面更冷。屏幕的对比度也不高。

336
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 359 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 344 cd/m² Minimum: 10.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 347 cd/m²
Contrast: 964:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.009
Teclast T50 Pro
IPS, 2000x1200, 11"
Teclast T50
IPS, 2000x1200, 11"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6"
Response Times
-15%
-37%
8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
46.4 ?(26.7, 19.7)
45.5 ?(22.8, 22.7)
2%
53.6 ?(24.4, 29.2)
-16%
38.13 ?(17.15, 20.98)
18%
Response Time Black / White *
22.5 ?(10.5, 12)
29.7 ?(13.4, 16.3)
-32%
35.6 ?(17.2, 18.4)
-58%
22.89 ?(10.42, 12.47)
-2%
PWM Frequency
Screen
17%
-4%
39%
Brightness middle
347
438
26%
368
6%
418
20%
Brightness
344
417
21%
346
1%
402
17%
Brightness Distribution
92
85
-8%
91
-1%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.36
0.5
-39%
0.61
-69%
0.28
22%
Contrast
964
876
-9%
603
-37%
1493
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
9.06
4.37
52%
6.9
24%
2.3
75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
13.84
7.48
46%
11.4
18%
5.4
61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
10.3
5.3
49%
7.7
25%
3.7
64%
Gamma
2.009 110%
2.322 95%
2.16 102%
2.21 100%
CCT
10599 61%
7855 83%
8547 76%
6595 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / 11%
-21% / -11%
24% / 33%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.5 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.7 ms rise
↘ 19.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率和耐用性

使用 Helio G99Teclast 在这个价位采用了功能强大的 SoC。无论是在 CPU 还是 GPU 基准测试中,其性能都大大超过了 Teclast T50甚至 三星Galaxy Tab A8 2022.红米 红米平板电脑实际上采用的是相同的 SoC,也能提供相当高的性价比。

在日常使用中,你通常可以流畅地浏览 T50 Pro,但 90 Hz 的屏幕肯定会让系统使用起来更加流畅。此外,T50 Pro 还支持更多现代图形 API,因此大多数游戏都能在平板电脑上运行。

在长时间负载情况下,最高温度仅为 35 °C,并不明显。在运行 20 次 3DMark Wild Life 之后,性能也与测试开始时保持在同一水平。

4 个扬声器听起来有点高音偏重,声音也不是特别大,但如果你想听懂视频中的语音或试听流行歌曲,它们已经足够了。不过,要享受真正的音频效果,建议使用可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接的外置扬声器或耳机。后者有许多编解码器可供选择:除了标准的 SBC、AAC、LDAC 和 aptX 外,还有更高质量的变体,如 LHDC 或 aptX HD。

Teclast T50 Pro 配备了 8,000 mAh 电池,电池容量甚至比 T50的电池容量。这是一项了不起的成就。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,T50 Pro 的续航时间也比其便宜的兄弟产品要长得多。我们测得的时间为 17:26 小时,即使在高强度使用的情况下也能轻松维持一天。该设备的充电功率为 18 瓦,需要 3 个多小时才能在电池电量耗尽时显示出 100% 的充电状态。遗憾的是,它不支持无线充电。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
558 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (490 - 576, n=17)
547 Points +3%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
530 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
365 Points -31%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
360 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2496 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1889 Points +13%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1670 - 1981, n=17)
1828 Points +9%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1670 Points
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1464 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1229 Points -26%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)
1093 Points +54%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (710 - 738, n=11)
728 Points +3%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
710 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)
3518 Points +89%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1864 - 2065, n=11)
1987 Points +7%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1864 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=17)
9894 Points +10%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9812 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9475 Points +6%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
8973 Points
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
7946 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
7447 Points -17%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2471 - 2791, n=16)
2593 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2583 Points +4%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2478 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (361 - 14235, n=47, last 2 years)
2050 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1425 Points -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2326 - 2655, n=16)
2434 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2412 Points +4%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2326 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (290 - 24605, n=47, last 2 years)
2176 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1252 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3439 Points +7%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3101 - 3471, n=16)
3346 Points +4%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3211 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (858 - 5751, n=47, last 2 years)
2796 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2768 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 17674, n=67, last 2 years)
4452 Points +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2644 Points +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2543 - 2843, n=16)
2642 Points +4%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2551 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1463 Points -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 29325, n=67, last 2 years)
5806 Points +144%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2375 - 3908, n=16)
2552 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2442 Points +3%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2375 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1284 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3717 Points +8%
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 7451, n=67, last 2 years)
3620 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3102 - 3798, n=16)
3575 Points +4%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3443 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2865 Points -17%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1743 Points +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1165 - 1364, n=17)
1239 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1237 Points +1%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1220 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
712 Points -42%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
466 Points -62%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 32525, n=72, last 2 years)
4578 Points +279%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1215 Points 0%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1209 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1011 - 1340, n=17)
1195 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
708 Points -41%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
467 Points -61%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 8689, n=73, last 2 years)
1303 Points +287%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (330 - 378, n=17)
346 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
343 Points +2%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
337 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
184 Points -45%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
132 Points -61%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 8889, n=71, last 2 years)
1543 Points +366%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (323 - 366, n=17)
337 Points +2%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
331 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
329 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
179 Points -46%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
127 Points -62%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years)
26.9 fps +92%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (12 - 44, n=17)
17.3 fps +24%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
12 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
9.9 fps -29%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
5.7 fps -59%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years)
55 fps +244%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
16 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (14 - 18, n=17)
15.7 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
10 fps -37%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
6.2 fps -61%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years)
18.6 fps +102%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8.3 - 28, n=17)
11.3 fps +23%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.2 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.4 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
6 fps -35%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
3.6 fps -61%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years)
21 fps +262%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5.4 - 6.5, n=17)
5.88 fps +1%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.4 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
3.6 fps -38%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2.3 fps -60%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 55.1, n=76, last 2 years)
9.87 fps +295%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2.5 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=17)
2.5 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.4 fps -4%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
0.96 fps -62%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points +34%
Teclast T50 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
21404 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (17228 - 25005, n=17)
20999 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
17557 Points -18%
Teclast T50
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
13640 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
UNISOC T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
10787 Points -50%
Teclast T50 ProTeclast T50Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Xiaomi Redmi PadAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
-77%
3%
-9%
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB
962.9
920.5
-4%
255.1
-74%
976.9
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
871
713.4
-18%
101.1
-88%
883.6
1%
694 ?(369 - 913, n=32)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
230.7
207.1
-10%
68.3
-70%
250.82
9%
Random Write 4KB
251.6
238.1
-5%
57.5
-77%
257.02
2%

温度

Max. Load
 34 °C35 °C31.5 °C 
 33.1 °C31.7 °C30.7 °C 
 33 °C31.1 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 32.2 °C
32 °C35 °C32.5 °C
30.8 °C32.4 °C32.1 °C
30.3 °C30.7 °C31.5 °C
Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 31.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.6 °C | Room Temperature 23.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


正面热图
正面热图
热图背面
热图背面
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
99.2 (1.091min - 1.101max) %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
97.9 (2.03min - 2.07max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Teclast T50
99.7 (2.79min - 2.8max) % +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
99.6 (4.25min - 4.27max) % +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
99 (7.39min - 7.47max) % +1%
Teclast T50 Pro
98.1 (6.98min - 7.12max) %

Legend

 
Teclast T50 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast T50 Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040362535.940.33133.545.94034.532.65036.533.96327.529.48020.319.110020.318.112520.623.716022.338.420017.947.525013.851.331515.155.740012.561.550011.962.963011.664.580014.467.5100014.375.4125012.473.2160010.468.6200010.668.325001165.9315011.565.4400012.264.5500012.966.5630013.562.7800014.358.5100001563.21250015.759.91600016.643.1SPL25.280.3N0.745.6median 13.8median 62.9Delta2.18.537.538.526.323.523.725.135.925.53637.124.92420.424.118.53216.941.117.955.11654.514.159.212.259.913.360.110.967.412.371.712.176.912.578.911.877.411.976.612.475.912.875.813.168.81365.113.26613.667.813.670.613.769.31466.313.853.825860.663.7median 13.2median 67.41.66.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T50 ProXiaomi Redmi Pad
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T50 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
8000 mAh
1057 min +1%
Teclast T50 Pro
8000 mAh
1046 min
Teclast T50
7500 mAh
903 min -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (319 - 1764, n=78, last 2 years)
816 min -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
679 min -35%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 26min

Pros

+ 更快的内存
+ 快速处理器
+ 运行速度极快
+ 支持 LTE
+ 几乎不发热
+ LED 闪光灯

Cons

- 相机性能一般
- 没有 Widevine 认证
- 屏幕略暗,偏蓝现象严重
- 微小的处理缺陷

结论--价格提示,有改进潜力

回顾Teclast T50 Pro。测试设备由 Teclast 欧洲公司提供。
回顾Teclast T50 Pro。测试设备由 Teclast 欧洲公司提供。

Teclast T50 Pro 绝对是一款低于 300 欧元的超值产品。充足的存储空间、LTE 功能和相对较快的处理器确保了这一点。

不过,制造商也有一些令人费解的决定:例如,为什么屏幕比 Teclast T50 Pro 暗得多呢? Teclast T50?制造商可能需要更新 Widevine 认证,否则无法观看高清流媒体内容。

这款平板电脑相对较轻,但运行时间仍然很好,可以使用纯Android ,没有广告软件,即使在负载情况下也几乎不会发热。总之,Teclast T50 Pro 有很多值得称道之处。

Teclast T50 Pro 价格便宜,但仍能提供移动连接、强大的性能和宽敞快速的内存配置。

如果你想省点钱,可以购买更便宜的 Teclast T50但在内存和性能方面必须做出让步。小米 小米红米平板电脑提供强劲的动力和 90 Hz 的屏幕。

价格和供应情况

Teclast T50 Pro 在AliExpress 的售价约为 224 欧元(约合 224 美元)。.亚马逊(amazon.de)的商店页面已经存在,但尚未激活。根据制造商的说法,这款平板电脑将于 2023 年 8 月底在亚马逊上市。

Teclast T50 Pro - 07/21/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 65%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
92%
Display
79%
Games Performance
26 / 78 → 33%
Application Performance
67 / 92 → 73%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
49 / 85 → 58%
Average
73%
83%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Teclast T50 Pro 平板电脑评测--移动通信和充足的存储空间,物美价廉
Florian Schmitt, 2023-07-22 (Update: 2023-07-22)