小米红米Pad评测--经济实惠的Android ，具有90Hz和4个扬声器的平板电脑

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Brand: Xiaomi

红米首次亮相。

通过红米Pad，小米推出了其第一款红米系列平板电脑。这表明，这款10.6英寸的设备以实惠的价格提供了良好的功能。虽然红米平板电脑在我们的审查中以90-Hz显示屏、光滑的金属结构和长电池寿命等特点而大放异彩，但我们也发现了一些不足之处。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/08/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

不同的设备级别，相同的目标：就像流行的红米智能手机系列一样，该系列由经济型和中档手机组成，往往能提供大量的价格，红米Pad也试图给你带来最大的收益。

小米红米Pad的起价约为240美元。这款10.6英寸的Android 12平板电脑配备了八核的联发科Helio G99SoC和高达128GB的存储空间。附带的充电器能够以高达18瓦的功率为内部8000毫安的电池充电。虽然红米Pad在许多方面做得很好，但我们在审查中也发现了一些缺点。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Redmi Pad Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

4 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

10.61 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 220 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 400 Nits, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 105.1 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Acceleration sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.05 x 250.38 x 157.98

Battery

8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18W fast charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF, video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix FOV 105°, FocusFrame, video recording up to 1080p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, 22.5W charger (10V/2.25A), USB cable, microSD slot eject tool, Quick start guide, Warranty information , MIUI 13, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

445 g, Power Supply: 65 g

Price

330 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	445 g	7.05 mm	10.61"	2000x1200
88.5 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	487 g	7.5 mm	10.20"	2160x1620
80.9 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Huawei MatePad T10S Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4	450 g	7.85 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	508 g	6.9 mm	10.50"	1920x1200
80.5 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Teclast T40 Pro T618, Mali-G52 MP2	480 g	9.2 mm	10.36"	2000x1200
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Xiaomi Pad 5 SD 860, Adreno 640	511 g	6.85 mm	11.00"	2560x1600

机箱 - 轻量级铝制一体成型机箱

尽管红米系列由更多面向预算的智能手机和平板电脑组成，但这并不一定意味着用户在材料或制造质量方面将不得不做出重大妥协。同样，红米Pad也不符合刻板的廉价设备原型。

扁平的金属外壳高度为7.05毫米，除了看起来相当结实外，还留下了优质的视觉和触觉印象。虽然外壳可以从较短的边缘轻微扭曲，但其刚性足以满足日常使用。然而，这款平板电脑并没有IP认证。

红米Pad的重量为445克，相当轻，比我们比较的所有具有类似尺寸的竞争对手都要轻，包括 Apple iPad 2021和三星Galaxy Tab A8 2022.

小米提供三种颜色的变体。用户可以选择灰色（石墨灰），银色（月光银），以及浅绿色（薄荷绿）。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Pad 5 Apple iPad 2021 Xiaomi Redmi Pad Teclast T40 Pro Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Huawei MatePad T10S DIN A5 ❌

连接性 - 3种内存配置

小米红米Pad有三种不同的配置。在撰写本文时，该平板电脑的价格约为240美元，配备3GB LPDDR4X内存和64GB UFS-2.2存储。4/128GB和6/128GB机型的价格分别约为250美元和280美元。内部存储可以通过以exFAT格式化的microSD卡扩展，容量可达1TB。

另外一个8/128-GB的配置目前在中国市场上独家提供。它是否会进入其他地区，目前还不确定。

红米Pad使用USB-C 2.0接口进行充电和数据传输。由于缺乏3.5毫米耳机插孔，支持USB-OTG的端口也可作为音频输出。红米Pad通过其四扬声器产生杜比全景声，这些扬声器成对地占据了设备的短边。

微型SD卡读卡器

红米Tab的microSD读卡器与我们参考的Angelbird AV Pro V60存储卡一起使用时只能达到平均速度。

虽然连续读取和写入速度分别为66.1MB/s和35.8MB/s，是一个体面的，但特别是在读取操作期间，性能反复出现下滑。此外，在我们的复制测试中，小米平板电脑的速度非常慢，只有9.48MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	49.18 MB/s +419%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.12 MB/s +91%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	17.9 MB/s +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	9.48 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (6.67-45.8)

Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.5 (23.8-57.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)

Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.1 (16.3-45.8)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.1 (7.54-78.5)

Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (44.6-84.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.1 (47.9-85.6)

软件 -Android 12和MIUI 13用于小米红米Pad

红米Pad运行Android 12，带有小米自己的MIUI用户界面13.1版本。制造商在额外的软件方面没有包括很多。除了谷歌应用程序和小米工具的小集合，只有两个第三方应用程序WPS Office和Netflix--这两个都可以删除--预装了。由于支持DRM Widevine L1，这款平板电脑可以用来流传高清质量的内容。

MIUI 13不仅允许应用程序在全屏模式下运行，而且还允许在窗口视图中同时打开多个应用程序。此外，两个应用程序窗口可以自动对齐，各占一半的屏幕。然而，使用这一功能需要4GB版本的平板电脑（或更高版本），因为3GB型号不支持分割视图。

在测试时（12月初），红米平板电脑的Android 安全补丁可以追溯到01.09.22，使它们相当过时。根据小米公司的说法，操作系统更新和安全补丁没有官方支持窗口。

通信和GNSS - 蓝牙5.3和WiFi 5

凭借蓝牙5.3和Wi-Fi 5，小米红米Pad只支持两个通信渠道，因为NFC和WWAN选项都没有。也没有GPS模块。

结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，小米达到了非常稳定的Wi-Fi传输速度，接近Wi-Fi 5的极限，最高可达369 Mb/s。初始传输速度低是由路由器 "唤醒 "造成的。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	635 (320^min - 652^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	587 (290^min - 624^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	538 (317^min - 618^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	485 (191^min - 554^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	367 (358^min - 370^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	325 (163^min - 328^max) MBit/s -11%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	322 (315^min - 326^max) MBit/s -12%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	203 (158^min - 227^max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	349 (178^min - 357^max) MBit/s -5%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	346 (335^min - 360^max) MBit/s -6%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	239 (202^min - 259^max) MBit/s -35%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (358-370)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (163-328)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (178-357)

摄像机 - 团体视频聊天的特殊功能

小米红米Pad在平板电脑的最长边上有一个800万像素的自拍摄像头。它覆盖了105°的视野，以每秒30帧的速度拍摄高达1080p的视频，并配有FocusFrame功能，这应该是为了加强团体视频通话。

FocusFrame的工作原理类似于Apple's Center Stage。在视频通话过程中，红米Tab的自拍相机会自动检测所有当前参与者，并保持他们的焦点，即使他们在移动。然而，目前只支持少数几个应用程序。据小米称，FocusFrame可用于Facebook Messenger、微信和WhatsApp。

主摄像头的分辨率为800万像素，还支持高达1080p、30FPS的视频录制。与自拍相机一样，在良好的照明条件下，它以良好的视频质量闪亮登场，在低光照条件下，由于明显的图像噪音，它受到了很大的冲击。图片的情况也是如此。

在良好的环境光线下，主摄像头可以拍摄出色彩自然、对比度良好的照片。由于图像缺乏细节，放大是不可取的。与自拍相机一样，主摄像头在低光照情况下也不太适合。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 5-facher Zoom Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在我们测试实验室的理想条件下，主摄像头显示自己非常准确（最大deltaE为8.64）。在恶劣的照明条件下，我们用1勒克斯的场景来模拟，这不再是真的。这时，色彩准确性大大偏离了它的理想范围，以前清晰可见的测试图在黑暗中几乎完全消失了。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad: 5.41 ∆E min: 3.07 - max: 8.64 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括22.5瓦的充电器

小米包括一个22.5瓦的充电器，一条USB线（type-A-type-C），一个从插槽中弹出microSD卡的工具，一份快速启动指南，以及一张随Redmi Tab而来的保修卡。制造商没有提供专门为该平板电脑制作的配件。

由于在美国没有小米红米平板电脑的官方保修信息，买家应了解个别零售商的条件和我们的保修常见问题.

输入设备和处理 - 90-Hz und 2D面部识别

由于90-Hz的显示屏和8核的联发科Helio G99SoC，小米红米Pad在使用过程中感觉反应非常灵敏和流畅。即使是要求较高的应用程序的运行通常也没有任何问题，其性能足以同时打开多个应用程序。应该注意的是，这适用于我们的测试模型，有4GB的内存。相比之下，3GB版本可能偶尔会出现卡顿。

由于没有指纹传感器，2D面部识别是唯一可用的生物识别认证选项。虽然人脸解锁的工作没有任何障碍，而且解锁红米平板电脑没有任何明显的延迟，但由于其基于软件的性质，它的安全性不如密码或图案解锁。该平板电脑也可以用蓝牙设备解锁，但这只适用于某些小米智能手表和智能手环。

▶ load Youtube video

显示器 - IPS屏幕，400尼特

红米Pad的10.6英寸屏幕的原始分辨率为2000 x 1200像素，长宽比为15:9，像素密度为220PPI。IPS面板的标称亮度为400尼特，不使用脉宽调制，使该平板电脑有可能成为敏感用户的好选择。正如我们用显微镜进行的慢动作观察所显示的那样，时空抖动也是不存在的。

当显示纯白色图像（APL50）时，显示屏的平均亮度达到401.6尼特。当用较小的图像（APL18）重复这一测试时，这一数值增加到414尼特。在禁用环境光传感器的情况下，可以达到418尼特的最高亮度。我们在最低亮度设置下测得1.54尼特。


390 cd/m²	408 cd/m²	415 cd/m²
376 cd/m²	418 cd/m²	419 cd/m²
381 cd/m²	392 cd/m²	415 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 419 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 401.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.54 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1493:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21

	Xiaomi Redmi Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6"	Apple iPad 2021 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2"	Huawei MatePad T10S LCD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5"	Teclast T40 Pro IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Xiaomi Pad 5 IPS, 2560x1600, 11"
Screen		3%	-29%	-78%	-24%	-22%
Brightness middle	418	507 21%	285 -32%	368 -12%	433 4%	491 17%
Brightness	402	491 22%	282 -30%	346 -14%	412 2%	473 18%
Brightness Distribution	90	90 0%	91 1%	91 1%	86 -4%	91 1%
Black Level *	0.28	0.5 -79%	0.3 -7%	0.61 -118%	0.48 -71%	0.87 -211%
Contrast	1493	1014 -32%	950 -36%	603 -60%	902 -40%	564 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.3	1.7 26%	3.53 -53%	6.9 -200%	3 -30%	1.9 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.4	3.9 28%	5.84 -8%	11.4 -111%	7.2 -33%	4.1 24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.7	2.4 35%	6.2 -68%	7.7 -108%	4.4 -19%	3 19%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.25 ^98%	2.044 ^108%	2.16 ^102%	2.12 ^104%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	6595 ^99%	6923 ^94%	8130 ^80%	8547 ^76%	7003 ^93%	7182 ^91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

▶ load Youtube video

IPS显示器的颜色可以通过在三种颜色预设中选择鲜艳、饱和和标准来调整。此外，色温可以通过色轮或三种预设之一来改变（标准、温暖或冷）。

标准颜色和色温设置提供最准确的结果。通过这些设置，屏幕可以实现良好的对比度、黑值和色温。对于日常使用来说，色彩准确性也是绰绰有余的。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.42 ms rise
22.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.47 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.15 ms rise
38.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.98 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

凭借良好的视角，小米红米Pad的IPS面板在户外使用时表现良好，只要环境光线条件不是太亮。由于最大亮度有点低，在阳光直射下，显示屏的可读性很快就会变差，因此，移动到阴凉处几乎是必要的。

性能 - 搭载联发科Helio G99的红米Pad

随着联发科Helio G992022年8月推出，小米红米Pad是基于中端ARM SoC的。这款6纳米的八核处理器依靠两个ARM Cortex-A76内核，其时钟速度高达2.2GHz，用于执行苛刻的任务，还有一个由六个高能效的Cortex-A55内核组成的集群，时钟速度高达2GHz。GPU是一个 ARM Mali-G57 MP2.

在我们的合成基准测试中，红米Pad的定位领先于许多同等价位的平板电脑。就性能而言，我们的测试设备介于红米T40 Pro(UNISOC T618)和其内部竞争者小米Pad 5，其性能明显更快，这要归功于其骁龙 860SoC。小米5 Apple iPad 2021具有更好的性能，击败了其所有的Android 替代品。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 2021	1328 Points +138%
Xiaomi Pad 5	784 Points +41%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	558 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (490 - 576, n=17)	547 Points -2%
Teclast T40 Pro	380 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	365 Points -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S	296 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 2021	3235 Points +71%
Xiaomi Pad 5	2768 Points +47%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1889 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1670 - 1981, n=17)	1828 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Pro	1303 Points -31%
Huawei MatePad T10S	1256 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1229 Points -35%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021	622382 Points +97%
Xiaomi Pad 5	575553 Points +82%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)	464403 Points +47%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (229468 - 375956, n=8)	317183 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	316212 Points
Teclast T40 Pro	240502 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	201310 Points -36%
Huawei MatePad T10S	182567 Points -42%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 5	11318 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8885 - 11379, n=17)	9894 Points +4%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9475 Points
Teclast T40 Pro	8364 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	7447 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad T10S	6622 Points -30%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad 2021	842 Points +46%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points +34%
Xiaomi Pad 5	635 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	575 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=10)	565 Points -2%
Teclast T40 Pro	384 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	361 Points -37%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 5	5154 Points +72%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points +41%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2855 - 3120, n=10)	3006 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2988 Points
Teclast T40 Pro	2145 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad T10S	2013 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1839 Points -38%
Apple iPad 2021	Points -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 5	8805 Points +35%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	6509 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5261 - 6776, n=10)	6230 Points -4%
Teclast T40 Pro	4863 Points -25%
Huawei MatePad T10S	4845 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	4729 Points -27%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5	5788 Points +63%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3454 - 4152, n=10)	3764 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	3550 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S	2896 Points -18%
Teclast T40 Pro	1608 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	970 Points -73%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5	10293 Points +258%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points +219%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2875 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2683 - 3002, n=10)	2799 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Pro	2063 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	2001 Points -30%
Huawei MatePad T10S	1452 Points -49%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 5	1346 Points +12%
Teclast T40 Pro	1313 Points +9%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1150 - 1325, n=10)	1252 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1246 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1201 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S	956 Points -20%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Pad 5	46413 Points +939%
Teclast T40 Pro	4695 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	4659 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	4468 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 ()	4468 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S	4455 Points 0%
Apple iPad 2021	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9213 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=9)	8584 Points -7%

VRMark - Amber Room
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2909 Score
Average Mediatek Helio G99 ()	2909 Score 0%
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years)	1183 Score -59%

Legend

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD

Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Mediatek Helio G99

Average of class Tablet

同样，与竞争对手相比，小米红米Pad在图形基准测试中的表现也很一般。这两款小米Pad 5和 Apple iPad 2021仍然能够以明显的优势超过它。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	1872 Points +469%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	970 Points +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	329 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	180 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	179 Points -46%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	152 Points -54%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	1992 Points +481%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	985 Points +187%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	343 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	184 Points -46%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	182 Points -47%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	153 Points -55%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	7858 Points +547%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3436 Points +183%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1215 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	709 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	708 Points -42%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	564 Points -54%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	7457 Points +503%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3428 Points +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1237 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	712 Points -42%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	709 Points -43%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	557 Points -55%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8661 Points +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3780 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2158 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points -44%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1501 Points -60%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12007 Points +215%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3809 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2002 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1957 Points -49%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1356 Points -64%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4385 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3683 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2969 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2862 Points -22%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2441 Points -34%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6981 Points +164%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	5362 Points +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2644 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1526 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1463 Points -45%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1124 Points -57%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	9773 Points +300%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8202 Points +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2442 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1338 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1284 Points -47%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	981 Points -60%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4590 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3717 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3007 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2865 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2365 Points -36%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	2078 Points -44%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5000 Points +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2452 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1518 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1488 Points -39%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1059 Points -57%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6876 Points +191%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2360 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1361 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1340 Points -43%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	954 Points -60%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2841 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2558 Points -10%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2541 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2422 Points -15%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	230 Points -92%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2583 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1456 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1425 Points -45%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1085 Points -58%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2412 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1281 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1252 Points -48%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	955 Points -60%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3439 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2783 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2768 Points -20%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2236 Points -35%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3473 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2140 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2084 Points -40%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1445 Points -58%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3482 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1998 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1958 Points -44%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1333 Points -62%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3441 Points
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2850 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2692 Points -22%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2256 Points -34%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +104%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	55 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps -29%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps -31%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	307 fps +387%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	184 fps +192%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps -35%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps -35%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +86%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps -29%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps -43%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	167 fps +318%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +173%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	28 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps -35%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps -35%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	57 fps +148%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -35%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -39%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	110 fps +340%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +212%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -40%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -40%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	43 fps +231%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.5 fps -35%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps -38%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	69 fps +360%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +213%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.1 fps -39%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	35 fps +317%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +102%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps -29%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.8 fps -43%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	31 fps +474%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +233%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.6 fps -33%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.6 fps -33%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.9 fps -46%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	50 fps +317%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.9 fps -17%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.9 fps -17%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.6 fps -37%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	82 fps +486%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps -29%
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.3 fps -69%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	2965 Points +223%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	917 Points

Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Native
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24.45 fps

Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26.11 fps

Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23.79 fps

Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26.81 fps

小米红米Pad是浏览网页的绝佳选择，甚至能够快速加载复杂的网站。不管怎么说，它的排名低于小米Pad 5在我们的浏览器基准中排名较低。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	142.2 Points +155%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +95%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	73 Points +31%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=9)	66.5 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	55.842 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	43.98 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)	30.25 Points -46%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	291.1 Points +222%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	128.1 Points +42%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 ()	90.4 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	90.377 Points
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)	75.3 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	66.5 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)	48.12 Points -47%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points +86%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=9)	69.6 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	56 Points

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	202 Points +140%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	149.6 Points +78%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	96 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=8)	95.4 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	84 Points
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)	76 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	75 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)	55 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	171 runs/min +349%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +203%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	61.3 runs/min +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=9)	52.5 runs/min +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	38.1 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	33.35 runs/min -12%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)	25.64 runs/min -33%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	47288 Points +169%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points +63%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	28456 Points +62%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=17)	20999 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	17557 Points
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)	14722 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	10787 Points -39%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)	9996 Points -43%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)	4122 ms * -69%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	3060 ms * -25%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)	2762 ms * -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	2443.7 ms *
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=9)	2058 ms * +16%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	1603 ms * +34%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	545 ms * +78%

* ... smaller is better

红米Tab内的UFS-2.2存储允许短的加载时间和高于其价格类别的平均速度。甚至小米Pad 5也无法在整体上跟上它，尽管它实现了明显更快的连续读取速度。

	Xiaomi Redmi Pad	Huawei MatePad T10S	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	Teclast T40 Pro	Xiaomi Pad 5	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-79%	-79%	-70%	-12%	-29%	-17%
Sequential Read 256KB	976.9	302.9 -69%	255.1 -74%	260.9 -73%	1459 49%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -25%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 7%
Sequential Write 256KB	883.6	99 -89%	101.1 -89%	199.2 -77%	534 -40%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) -40%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -23%
Random Read 4KB	250.82	51.1 -80%	68.3 -73%	94.2 -62%	208.7 -17%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) -24%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -25%
Random Write 4KB	257.02	57.8 -78%	57.5 -78%	83.6 -67%	158.9 -38%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -28%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -26%

游戏--即使在高要求的游戏中也能达到30FPS

集成的的ARM Mali-G57 MP2的图形解决方案。联发科Helio G99足以流畅地玩所有当前的游戏。也就是说，由于集成GPU的性能储备有限，在很多游戏中不太可能达到90-FPS的最大值。在我们的测试中，Armajet和Subway Surfers都一直以接近60FPS的速度运行。在其最大的可用HD/高设置下，PUBG Mobile被限制在30 FPS。

我们使用Gamebench来确定帧率。

Xiaomi Redmi Pad; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.4 (52-61)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad; PUBG Mobile; 2.3.0: Ø29.8 (27-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad; Subway Surfers; 3.4.0: Ø60.1 (50-61)

排放 - 四个带杜比全景声的扬声器

温度

小米红米Pad在使用过程中始终保持低温。即使经过一小时的压力测试，我们在平板电脑的表面也只测量到30.2℃，使其不至于温热。正如我们的3DMark Wild Life压力测试所显示的，联发科Helio G99的核心温度仍然相当低，没有大的节流现象。

最好的和最差的3DMark Wild Life Extreme运行只相差2％（345分和338分）。即使在最坏的基准情况下，性能水平也不会下降到98%以下。因此，在日常使用中，明显的性能下降基本上是不可能的。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.39-7.47)

Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.5 (38.7-44.5)

Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.34 (3.33-3.35)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)

Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.29)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.03-2.07)

Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø10.7 (10.6-12.2)

Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø0.92 (0.907-0.927)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)

Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.097 (1.093-1.102)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)

Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø4.25 (4.24-4.25)

Max. Load

Idle


29 °C	28.7 °C	27.4 °C
30.2 °C	27.9 °C	27.8 °C
30 °C	27.9 °C	27.4 °C

Maximum: 30.2 °C
Average: 28.5 °C


27.4 °C	28.1 °C	28.5 °C
26.6 °C	26.9 °C	28.3 °C
26.3 °C	27.3 °C	27.7 °C

Maximum: 28.5 °C
Average: 27.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

虽然红米Pad的四扬声器能产生体面的环绕声，但对中音和高音的过度强调使音频体验无法达到丰富和平衡。杜比全景声在默认情况下是启用的，可以通过Android ，以及动态、视频、音乐和语音四个声音预设来调整。

外部音频设备可以通过USB-C或蓝牙5.3连接到平板电脑。支持流行的蓝牙编解码器，如AAC、LDAC、aptX和aptX HD。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--高效电源和大型电池

能源消耗

我们对红米Pad非常低的能源消耗感到惊喜。虽然竞争者，如华为MatePad T10S在某些负载下甚至可以更经济，但小米平板电脑总体上是最高效的模型。

红米平板电脑的内部8000毫安时电池可以用附带的22.5瓦充电器进行充电。然而，这款平板电脑的最大充电功率限制在18瓦。为空电池完全充电，我们花了2：37小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.17 Watt
Idle	0.93 / 4.02 / 4.07 Watt
Load	5.52 / 6.89 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh	Apple iPad 2021 8686 mAh	Huawei MatePad T10S 5100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Teclast T40 Pro 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh
Power Consumption		-71%	-28%	-25%	-21%	-22%
Idle Minimum *	0.93	1.3 -40%	1.6 -72%	1.19 -28%	1.44 -55%	0.99 -6%
Idle Average *	4.02	7.5 -87%	2.8 30%	4.63 -15%	3.87 4%	4.2 -4%
Idle Maximum *	4.07	7.58 -86%	3.5 14%	4.68 -15%	3.91 4%	4.22 -4%
Load Average *	5.52	10.03 -82%	7.9 -43%	7.27 -32%	7.1 -29%	7.88 -43%
Load Maximum *	6.89	10.91 -58%	11.5 -67%	9.17 -33%	8.88 -29%	10.63 -54%

* ... smaller is better

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99: Ø3.68 (2.19-5.75)

Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic: Ø7.02 (2.66-13.2)

Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A: Ø6.81 (4.1-11.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618: Ø5.07 (2.29-8.38)

Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618: Ø5.06 (2.04-8.47)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860: Ø5.81 (2.06-10.2)

Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.44 (2.64-3.99)

Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (6.88-12.6)

Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.13 (6.8-7.44)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.62 (4.01-5.11)

Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.33 (3.47-7.13)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.83 (4-8.78)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.06 (2.02-2.37)

Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.87 (2.83-2.97)

Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.97 (2.9-3.05)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.42 (2.33-2.92)

Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.09 (2.03-2.15)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.88 (1.838-2.2)

电池寿命

电池寿命是小米红米平板电脑的一个强项。这款10.6英寸的平板电脑的模拟网页浏览时间为17:37小时，视频播放时间超过16小时，比其竞争对手的持续时间明显更长。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		60h 40min
WiFi Websurfing		17h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 10min

	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh	Apple iPad 2021 8686 mAh	Huawei MatePad T10S 5100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Teclast T40 Pro 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh
Battery Runtime		-22%	-48%	-31%	-24%	-18%
Reader / Idle	3640	2292 -37%	1354 -63%	1973 -46%		2641 -27%
H.264	971	898 -8%	625 -36%	824 -15%		1000 3%
WiFi v1.3	1057	805 -24%	557 -47%	679 -36%	806 -24%	733 -31%
Load	310	253 -18%	175 -44%	230 -26%		257 -17%

Pros

+ 轻量级和优质的外壳

+ 带有杜比全景声的四扬声器

+ 扎实的系统性能

+ 良好的90-Hz IPS显示屏

+ 优秀的电池寿命

Cons

- 没有指纹传感器

- 没有GPS

- 没有WWAN选项

- 无耳机插孔

对小米红米Pad的评判

如果你正在寻找一款好的中档平板电脑，小米红米Pad可能是适合你的设备。从240美元起，10.6英寸的型号有很多优点。

优点包括优质、轻质的金属外壳，良好的90Hz IPS显示屏，带有杜比全景声的四扬声器设置，以及出色的电池寿命。虽然有时可能会出现一些小的卡顿，但相对于价格而言，性能总体上是稳固的，甚至足以运行游戏。

虽然小米红米Pad是300美元以下类别中的一款好平板电脑，但价格仍然略高，我们无法明确推荐它。同时，内部竞争对手小米Pad 5的功能要好得多，而价格却没有大幅提高。

我们建议选择更大的4/128GB内存配置，因为与入门级的64/3GB机型相比，价格只高出10美元。后者只是略微便宜一些，而且不提供同时运行两个应用程序的分割视图。

小米平板电脑没有WWAN选项。同样，Wi-Fi模块的功能也很有限，仅限于支持Wi-Fi 5。将红米平板电脑作为家庭平板电脑使用时也有限制，因为既不支持笔输入，也不支持多用户账户。

笔记本三星Galaxy Tab A8 2022和小米Pad 5是小米红米Pad的潜在替代品。虽然小米Pad 5比我们的测试设备的128/6GB版本贵120美元左右，但它也提供了很多额外的功能。这包括一个120赫兹的HDR IPS面板和一个明显更快的 Snapdragon 860SoC。

价格和可用性

在亚马逊网站上，低端的64GB/3GB配置，售价约为240美元.而128GB/4GB机型价格约为250美元。280美元，128GB/6GB版本是目前最昂贵的SKU。

Xiaomi Redmi Pad - 12/05/2022 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

84 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

39 / 70 → 56%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 92%

Battery

91%

Display

87%

Games Performance

27 / 78 → 35%

Application Performance

67 / 92 → 73%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 91 → 86%

Camera

57 / 85 → 67%

Average

74%

85%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米红米Pad评测--经济实惠的Android ，具有90Hz和4个扬声器的平板电脑

Manuel Masiero, 2022-12- 8 (Update: 2024-08-15)