Notebookcheck Logo

Tecno Spark 10 Pro 智能手机评测--150 美元手机中的高分辨率自拍相机

国际特殊性。

Tecno Mobile Spark 10 Pro 是一款经济实惠的中端手机，配备 3200 万像素自拍摄像头，主要面向社交媒体爱好者。在这篇评测中，我们将对这款售价约 150 美元的手机进行更深入的了解。
Android ARM Smartphone
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Processor
Mediatek Helio G88 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2460 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated), NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (B2/3/5/8), 3G (B1/2/4/5/8), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32//B38/40/41/66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 168.4 x 76.2
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.6, phase comparison-AF, dual LED-flash, Videos @1440p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, depth of field (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix flash
Additional features
Speakers: 1, charger, USB cable, headset, silicone bumper, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, FM radio, fanless
Weight
206 g
Price
200 Euro
Links
Tecno homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
76.1 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2		206 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.80"2460x1080
78.7 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Tecno Spark 10 5G
Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2		194 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"1612x720
79 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2		198.5 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.79"2460x1080
75.9 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2		201 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
78.7 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Nokia G22
T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1		195 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.52"1600x720

手机壳和功能 - 智能手机空间充足

在国际上，Tecno Spark 10 Pro 还有令人兴奋甚至不同寻常的变体。除了经典的白色和黑色（在欧洲也有销售）外，还有一款黑白双色机型，机背采用合成皮革。不过，最特别的颜色选择是魔幻品红色。它之所以脱颖而出，不仅因为其部分粉红色的背面和边框，还因为它在黑暗中会发出荧光，散发出绿色的光芒。

Tecno Spark 10 Pro 提供 256 GB 的超大存储容量，但与之不同的是，这些令人兴奋的颜色选项目前在欧洲和美国都没有销售。因此，我们的测试机是拥有 128 GB 存储空间和 8 GB 内存的黑色机型。这款手机做工精良，但容易弯曲和凹陷。不过，考虑到其相对较低的价位，耐用性还是可以接受的。

Tecno 手机具有 NFC 功能。此外，它还配备了专用的 microSD 读卡器，在我们的测试中，该读卡器的传输速率相对较高，给人留下了深刻印象。

Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Tecno Spark 10 Pro

尺寸比较

❌
168.4 mm 76.2 mm 8.5 mm 206 g168.6 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 198.5 g167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 201 g165 mm 76.2 mm 8.5 mm 195 g164.4 mm 75.5 mm 8.4 mm 194 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50 MB/s +70%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
29.4 MB/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=80, last 2 years)
29.2 MB/s -1%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
27.5 MB/s -6%
Nokia G22
  (Angelbird V60)
19.6 MB/s -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
  (Angelbird V60)
18.7 MB/s -36%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Tecno Spark 10 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.8 (22.9-47.5)
Tecno Spark 10 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6020, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø72.7 (25.1-79.7)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.3 (25.7-45.6)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.3 (26.7-47.7)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.6 (30.1-45.4)
Tecno Spark 10 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.6 (22.7-82.6)
Tecno Spark 10 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6020, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø36.3 (22.7-48)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.8 (25.3-76.1)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.3 (37-79.3)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (39-81.8)

通信、软件和操作 - 波动的数据传输速率

WiFi 5 是该手机能够支持的最快无线局域网标准。遗憾的是，在我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE 11000 进行测试的整个过程中，传输速度经常出现中断，这种情况可能会重现。总体而言，该手机的传输速度在同价位手机中处于较低水平；而同类手机的传输速度则要流畅得多。

Tecno Spark 10 Pro 是一款 4G 手机，具有特定的 LTE 频率，可以在国外使用。在城市环境中进行测试的整个期间，我们从未遇到过信号中断的情况，但值得注意的是，它的信号质量还无法与高端智能手机相媲美。

Android 13 作为主操作系统，该公司在此基础上添加了自己的 HiOS。这种定制明显改变了界面，并引入了额外的功能，如用于信息服务的语音扭曲器和用于保护屏幕隐私的遮光功能。

这款手机预装了大量第三方软件，如果你喜欢更干净的系统，可能需要对这些软件进行清理。在我们的测试过程中，该设备的安全补丁截至 2023 年 8 月，这是相当新的。目前，它每隔几个月就会收到一次更新；不过，供应商并未提供有关支持期限的信息。

90 Hz 的屏幕确保了快速的输入响应，并为整体流畅的系统性能做出了贡献。即使在边角位置，触摸屏的反应也很灵敏。指纹传感器位于右侧，与待机键集成在一起，允许从待机模式直接解锁，但会有轻微延迟。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi 12
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (341min - 376max) MBit/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
365 (331min - 379max) MBit/s +10%
Nokia G22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
362 (319min - 378max) MBit/s +9%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
358 (350min - 366max) MBit/s +8%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
332 (68min - 375max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
337 (68min - 354max) MBit/s +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
317 (284min - 330max) MBit/s +5%
Nokia G22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
315 (226min - 328max) MBit/s +4%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
306 (273min - 326max) MBit/s +1%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
303 (248min - 332max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Tecno Spark 10 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø302 (248-332)
Tecno Spark 10 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (68-375)

摄像头 - 单后置摄像头

前置摄像头拍摄
前置摄像头拍摄

手机后部配备了一个 5000 万像素的单摄像头，仅支持在肖像中创建模糊效果。主摄像头的快照乍看之下还不错，但如果亮度再高一些就更好了。令人惊讶的是，天空的表现显得有些浑浊，整体画面的细节也没有预期的那么准确。

手机在捕捉弱光场景时具有良好的情绪表现，但在非常暗的区域往往会失去动态范围。

视频录制最高支持 1440p 分辨率，每秒 30 格。自动对焦一般表现可靠，亮度调节也很有效。

3200 万像素的前置摄像头通常可拍摄 800 万像素的照片，像素更大，感光度更高。有一个特殊的设置，可以捕捉全部 3200 万像素分辨率的图像。使用该摄像头拍摄的自拍照可略有增强，而暗处的细节仍然清晰可见。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
10.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Tecno Spark 10 Pro: 9.61 ∆E min: 3.67 - max: 14.56 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.3 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
36 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
56.5 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
57 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
36 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Tecno Spark 10 Pro: 40.07 ∆E min: 13.83 - max: 64.06 ∆E

显示屏 - 全高清屏幕，亮度足够

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

虽然全高清屏幕还不是这个价位的所有设备的标准配置，但 Tecno Spark 10 Pro 配备了全高清屏幕。

屏幕的最大亮度平均为 459 cd/m²，处于较高水平。只有 诺基亚 G22在这方面超过了它。在光线极强的日子里，在户外使用 Tecno 智能手机可能会有些困难，但对于大多数日常场景来说，屏幕亮度还是绰绰有余的。

黑屏亮度较低，能营造出深邃的暗区，增强色彩对比度。不过，在我们使用分光光度计进行的测试中，色彩还原被证明相当一般。有明显的偏蓝现象，几乎所有的颜色都明显偏离最佳值。

我们没有检测到任何 PWM，因此即使是敏感的消费者也可以放心使用这款手机。

432
cd/m²		446
cd/m²		450
cd/m²
420
cd/m²		459
cd/m²		423
cd/m²
419
cd/m²		443
cd/m²		426
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 459 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 459 cd/m²
Contrast: 1530:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8"		Tecno Spark 10 5G
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"		Xiaomi Redmi 12
IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"		Nokia G22
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Response Times
-45%
-20%
-19%
-105%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
23.2 ?(12.8, 10.4)
21.6 ?(10.1, 11.5)
7%
34 ?(18.7, 15.3)
-47%
35.55 ?(16.32, 19.23)
-53%
60.2 ?(33, 27.2)
-159%
Response Time Black / White *
18.5 ?(10.1, 8.4)
36.4 ?(19.6, 16.8)
-97%
17.2 ?(9.9, 7.3)
7%
15.68 ?(4.963, 10.72)
15%
27.7 ?(17.9, 9.8)
-50%
PWM Frequency
343500
Screen
16%
11%
-21%
22%
Brightness middle
459
460
0%
449
-2%
465
1%
674
47%
Brightness
435
435
0%
437
0%
439
1%
641
47%
Brightness Distribution
91
89
-2%
95
4%
89
-2%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.3
0.3
-0%
0.5
-67%
0.47
-57%
0.43
-43%
Contrast
1530
1533
0%
898
-41%
989
-35%
1567
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.19
4.04
44%
2.29
68%
8.5
-18%
4.45
38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
13.1
6.84
48%
4.49
66%
15.8
-21%
7.41
43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.4
5
40%
3.7
56%
11.8
-40%
5.1
39%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.239 98%
2.254 98%
2.2 100%
2.072 106%
CCT
9402 69%
7896 82%
6198 105%
10757 60%
7799 83%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-15% / 4%
-5% / 4%
-20% / -21%
-42% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
18.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.1 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 动力充足，外形美观

联发科 联发科 Helio G88是一款中端 SoC，可为日常任务提供充足的动力。虽然建议避免运行复杂的应用程序或进行过多的多任务处理，但在正常使用时，系统仍能保持流畅，不会出现卡顿。

在长时间负载情况下，43.5 °C的最高温度虽然明显，但并不严重，而且严格控制在局部范围内。此外，在 3DMark 压力测试中，SoC 的节流极小。

位于底部边缘的单声道扬声器相对较弱，往往会产生非常重的高音。这使得音乐或电影的音效大打折扣。为了获得更好的音频体验，建议通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接耳机或外置扬声器。幸运的是，这款手机支持几种重要的无线声音传输标准，包括 SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX 和 aptX HD。

在我们的无线局域网测试中，5,000 毫安时电池的续航时间达到了惊人的 14 小时 26 分钟，让你在一般使用条件下无需充电即可使用一天。如有必要，可在最大 18 瓦的功率下为手机充电。值得一提的是，一个完整的充电周期需要 2 个多小时。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench | Octane V2
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +174%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
539 Points +43%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
378 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
375 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (284 - 378, n=6)
357 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
350 Points -7%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
310 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points +169%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1813 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1334 Points +4%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1318 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1132 - 1475, n=6)
1316 Points +2%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1288 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1284 Points 0%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points +237%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
709 Points +60%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
442 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (432 - 442, n=5)
436 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
434 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
413 Points -7%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points +221%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1781 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1384 Points +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1217 - 1436, n=5)
1311 Points +1%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1302 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1223 Points -6%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +41%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9850 Points +5%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
9356 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9290 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (6789 - 9802, n=6)
8764 Points -6%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6637 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5720 Points -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)
3006 Points +114%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2589 Points +84%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1407 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1392 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1354 - 1407, n=6)
1384 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1322 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)
3166 Points +152%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2418 Points +93%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1255 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1242 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1183 - 1255, n=6)
1229 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1161 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3441 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)
3260 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2561 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2339 - 2734, n=6)
2490 Points +2%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
2439 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2414 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)
8254 Points +468%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2549 Points +75%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1453 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1334 - 1453, n=6)
1397 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1346 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1334 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)
12419 Points +873%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2347 Points +84%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1277 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1177 - 1277, n=6)
1230 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1178 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1177 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)
4759 Points +69%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3647 Points +30%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
2815 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2694 Points -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2427 - 2935, n=6)
2667 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2502 Points -11%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=112, last 2 years)
2823 Points +272%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1191 Points +57%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
759 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
736 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (697 - 759, n=6)
725 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
706 Points -7%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
408 Points -46%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=188, last 2 years)
7929 Points +950%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1147 Points +52%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
755 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
749 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
716 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (622 - 755, n=6)
716 Points -5%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
413 Points -45%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=195, last 2 years)
2172 Points +1037%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
322 Points +69%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
191 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
189 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (179 - 191, n=6)
186.5 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
179 Points -6%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
114 Points -40%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points +1046%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
313 Points +66%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
189 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
188 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (156 - 189, n=6)
179.8 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
178 Points -6%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
112 Points -41%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)
50.7 fps +511%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
29 fps +249%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
10 fps +20%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
8.3 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (7.5 - 9, n=6)
8.25 fps -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.8 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps -10%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)
84.9 fps +803%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
16 fps +70%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.5 fps +1%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
9.4 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (8.2 - 9.7, n=6)
9.22 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.5 fps -10%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.5 fps -41%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)
38.9 fps +694%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
18 fps +267%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.4 fps +31%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (4.7 - 5.9, n=6)
5.12 fps +4%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
4.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.8 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps -4%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)
34 fps +871%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.7 fps +63%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
3.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.4 fps -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (3.2 - 3.5, n=6)
3.4 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.2 fps -9%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2 fps -43%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 53, n=207, last 2 years)
15.9 fps +894%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.4 fps +50%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1.4 - 1.6, n=5)
1.5 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.4 fps -12%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
0.85 fps -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +352%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
16765 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11782 Points +38%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
10858 Points +27%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (7611 - 13413, n=6)
9991 Points +17%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
8523 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7611 Points -11%
Tecno Spark 10 ProTecno Spark 10 5GXiaomi Redmi 12Samsung Galaxy A14 LTENokia G22Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
131%
2%
-28%
84%
-24%
349%
Sequential Read 256KB
314.7
940.4
199%
300
-5%
298.69
-5%
881
180%
284 ?(106.7 - 511, n=77)
-10%
1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
500%
Sequential Write 256KB
239.8
490
104%
272.5
14%
200.17
-17%
367
53%
194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=77)
-19%
1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
513%
Random Read 4KB
108.6
219.8
102%
84.8
-22%
55.9
-49%
131
21%
82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=77)
-24%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
156%
Random Write 4KB
95
208.2
119%
115
21%
55.86
-41%
172
81%
55.4 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=77)
-42%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
227%

温度

Max. Load
 43.5 °C33.9 °C32.4 °C 
 41.5 °C35 °C32.7 °C 
 40.3 °C34.9 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 36.3 °C
33.2 °C34 °C39.8 °C
33.3 °C35.8 °C40.1 °C
33.1 °C34.4 °C39.2 °C
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.1 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


正面热图
正面热图
热图背面
热图背面
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
98.9 (1.14min - 1.153max) %
Xiaomi Redmi 12
98 (1.123min - 1.147max) % -1%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
97.3 (1.932min - 1.986max) % -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
95.6 % -3%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
99.6 (4.53min - 4.55max) %
Tecno Spark 10 5G
99.3 (7.15min - 7.2max) % 0%
Nokia G22
96.8 (2.44min - 2.52max) % -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
96.4 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
96.4 (4.15min - 4.31max) % -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
95.9 (4.33min - 4.52max) % -4%

Legend

 
Tecno Spark 10 Pro Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Tecno Spark 10 5G MediaTek Dimensity 6020, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia G22 Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.2382535.837.83132.831.94031.529.65034.433.26325.329.38023.523.110020.221.412517.117.516015.517.320015.625.92502031.531512.436.840010.240.850011.243.963011.748.180012.554.4100011.862.8125011.466.2160010.960.5200011.258.5250011.759.4315012.358.6400012.864.2500013.565.2630014.264.8800014.958.21000015.657.41250016.565.31600017.359.5SPL25.173.9N0.629.7median 12.8median 58.2Delta2.313.231.63831.541.226.331.936.433.13836.13125.718.720.319.518.419.221.317.330.212.23611.843.311.149.811.65710.762.69.264.713.56511.967.612.171.310.172.89.872.310.66810.970.511.867.512.569.813.362.914.16614.968.415.659.616.340.124.481.10.548median 12.1median 64.72.111.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTecno Spark 10 ProNokia G22
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Tecno Spark 10 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia G22 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Nokia G22
5050 mAh
1052 min +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years)
991 min +14%
Tecno Spark 10 5G
5000 mAh
962 min +11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
896 min +3%
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
5000 mAh
866 min
Xiaomi Redmi 12
5000 mAh
803 min -7%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 26min

Pros

+ 丰富的存储空间
+ 全高清屏幕
+ 无 PWM 闪烁
+ 运行时间长

Cons

- 波动的无线局域网数据传输速率
- 蹩脚的 eMMC 闪存
- 扬声器效果一般
- 相机系统不太灵活

评价--并非没有缺陷

Tecno Spark 10 Pro 评测。测试设备由 Tecno Mobile 提供。
Tecno Spark 10 Pro 评测。测试设备由 Tecno Mobile 提供。

Tecno Spark 10 Pro 要在竞争激烈的经济型中档手机市场中脱颖而出面临着挑战，特别是因为配备额外内存和独特外壳的独特机型目前在美国还没有销售。

不过，这款坚固的手机性能良好，电池续航时间可观，外壳做工精良。即使闪光灯速度不是很快，但全高清屏幕和 128 GB 存储空间还是物有所值。

但它也有一些局限性，比如 Wi-Fi 连接速度时有时无的降低、扬声器不合格以及预装软件过多，有些用户可能会觉得烦人。好的一面是，即使长时间使用，手机也能保持稳定的性能，屏幕也不会出现 PWM 闪烁。

Tecno Spark 10 Pro 拥有稳定的存储配置和适合日常使用的电池续航时间，但在其他方面很难在其他廉价中端手机中脱颖而出。

小米 小米红米 12拥有额外的蓝牙编解码器和更可定制的相机系统。追求 5G 的用户可以考虑价格稍高的 Tecno Spark 10 5G.

价格和供应情况

珍珠白版本在亚马逊网站上的售价为 150 美元。

Tecno Spark 10 Pro - 09/20/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
82%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 25%
Application Performance
62 / 86 → 72%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
50 / 90 → 56%
Camera
54%
Average
70%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Tecno Spark 10 Pro (Spark Series)
Review
•
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 智能手机评测--出人...
|
Review
•
Tecno Spark 10 5G 智能手机评测：无 PWM...

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Tecno Spark 10 Pro 智能手机评测--150 美元手机中的高分辨率自拍相机
Florian Schmitt, 2023-09-22 (Update: 2023-09-22)