联想ThinkPad X13第二代评测。AMD Ryzen Pro让紧凑的商务笔记本变得更快
ThinkPad X13第二代 "这个名字指的是两个型号。联想最小的企业级ThinkPad,除了 联想ThinkPad X1 Nano,同时提供英特尔和AMD处理器。当ThinkPad X13第二代英特尔在7月通过我们的测试实验室时,我们已经审查了今年的16:10大更新--现在轮到AMD型号了。在这种情况下,像往常一样,我们不会再讨论关于设计、连接和输入设备的细节,而是直接跳到显示部分。你可以在《联想ThinkPad X13第二代》的评论中找到其他主题的信息。 联想ThinkPad X13第二代Intel.
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.6 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE R5 PRO 5650U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 18.19 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 18.2 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2021 | HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA R5 PRO 4650U, Vega 6 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 946 g | 16 mm | 13.00" | 2160x1350 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
显示。16:10首次出现在Ryzen ThinkPad上
随着今年ThinkPad X13第二代的16:10重新设计,联想刷新了可供选择的显示屏范围。高清分辨率(1366x768)终于从阵容中剔除。此外,ThinkPad X13第二代的所有显示屏现在都是基于IPS的。
- 1920x1200 (WUXGA), 300 cd/m², 哑光, 72% NTSC
- 1920x1200 (WUXGA), 300 cd/m², 哑光, 72% NTSC, On-Cell Touch
- 1920x1200 (WUXGA), 500 cd/m², 亚光, 72% NTSC ePrivacy Filter
- 2560x1600 (WQXGA), 400 cd/m², 哑光, 72% NTSC, 低功耗
我们已经能够在ThinkPad X13第二代英特尔中测试安装在我们设备中的基本面板,它具有WUXGA分辨率,由京东方制造。测量结果非常相似,尽管这里评测的模型略显暗淡,而且刚刚错过了300 cd/m²的指定亮度值,平均为297 cd/m²。与竞争对手相比,这两款轻便的联想ThinkPad X1 Nano以及 戴尔XPS 13 9310提供了更高的亮度。
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 309 cd/m²
Contrast: 1188:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE NV133WUM-N61, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE NV133WUM-N61, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 B133HAK01.1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA CMN13AA, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE MND007ZA1-2, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -7% | -41% | 1% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.1 | 71.1 1% | 64.8 -8% | 40.86 -42% | 70.9 1% | 70.4 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.7 0% | 95.6 -4% | 61 -39% | 99.1 0% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.3 | 71.1 0% | 65.7 -8% | 42.27 -41% | 72.9 2% | 72 1% |
Response Times | 16% | -52% | -11% | -52% | -33% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 30.8 ? 9% | 56.8 ? -67% | 38 -12% | 52 ? -53% | 46.8 ? -38% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 17.2 ? 22% | 30 ? -36% | 24 -9% | 33.2 ? -51% | 28 ? -27% |
PWM Frequency | 24000 ? | 2475 ? | ||||
Screen | -34% | -78% | -112% | -34% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 309 | 320 4% | 331 7% | 245 -21% | 543.3 76% | 460 49% |
Brightness | 297 | 310 4% | 315 6% | 228 -23% | 524 76% | 434 46% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 89 10% | 90 11% | 86 6% | 92 14% | 92 14% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.24 8% | 0.21 19% | 0.19 27% | 0.38 -46% | 0.27 -4% |
Contrast | 1188 | 1333 12% | 1576 33% | 1289 9% | 1430 20% | 1704 43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.7 -69% | 6.1 -281% | 5.84 -265% | 3.02 -89% | 1.1 31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 7.6 -153% | 10 -233% | 8.87 -196% | 7.61 -154% | 4.5 -50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 0.9 -13% | 1.2 -50% | 3.45 -331% | 1.23 -54% | 1 -25% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 4.1 -105% | 6.3 -215% | 6.35 -218% | 5 -150% | 1.6 20% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.77 79% | 2.4 92% | 2.02 109% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6315 103% | 6429 101% | 6938 94% | 6649 98% | 6550 99% | 6475 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.7 | 39 | 66.8 | 65.7 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.4 | 61 | 99.6 | 99.9 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-19% | -46% /
-59% | -55% /
-83% | -28% /
-29% | -6% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱后,联想ThinkPad X13 Gen 2 AMD的色彩配置文件可以说是略微太暖了--像往常一样,显示测量是用CalMan软件和X-Rite i1Pro 2色度计进行的。我们能够通过使用X-Rite i1Profiler进行校准来纠正这种影响,校准后颜色值的平均DeltaE 2000达到了良好的0.8。一如既往,你可以免费下载我们创建的颜色配置文件。
该显示器的图像再现是可以接受的,尽管不是很好--比测得的1,188:1的对比度值稍高一些会对该显示器有利。另一方面,sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率难以提高,因为这个小的色彩空间几乎完全覆盖,覆盖率为99.4%。因此,在校准后,你可以期待在网上冲浪或简单的图像编辑时有合理准确的色彩。
亮度足以让联想ThinkPad X13第二代AMD的磨砂显示屏上的内容在白天的室外也能阅读。不过,特别是对于一台次笔记本来说,用户可能会发现自己希望将来能有一个稍高的亮度。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能。AMD Ryzen Pro为联想笔记本电脑提供性能提升
在ThinkPad X13第二代AMD中,有三款专业和一款非专业的Ryzen CPU可供选择。AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 5450U,以及Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U,以及Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U以及 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U.没有专用的GPU,这意味着集成的AMD Radeon解决方案将不得不做。
自2018年以来,ThinkPad X系列的内存已经被焊接起来--至少现在有高达32GB的内存,而且ThinkPad X13第二代现在采用更快的LPDDR4X-4266内存,而不是DDR4-3200。一个最大容量为2TB的M.2-2280固态硬盘,使用NVMe PCIe 3.0接口,承担了大容量存储的角色。
处理器
淘宝网AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U是一款U型处理器,典型消耗量为15至25瓦。其 "塞尚 "一代的六个Zen 3核心的最大时钟频率达到4.2 GHz,基本时钟速度为2.3 GHz。由于采用了超线程技术,该处理器共提供12个线程。你可以使用我们的CPU基准测试文章来进行广泛的基准比较。
在去年的 ThinkPad X13 Gen 1 AMD中,我们能够测试现有最快的处理器,即Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U在该案例中。令人印象深刻的是,联想ThinkPad X13第二代AMD中更现代的六核处理器设法与旧的八核CPU相匹配。在单核模式下,塞尚芯片明显比雷诺阿CPU快,而在多核性能方面,两者之间的差异很小。
CPU的性能完全可以靠电池供电。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (6210 - 7140, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (1356 - 1367, n=3) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (2415 - 2771, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (524 - 533, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (1048 - 1333, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (217 - 221, n=3) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (422 - 455, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (32687 - 35665, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (5021 - 5081, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (5634 - 5788, n=3) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (1352 - 1384, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (8.36 - 9.27, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (35.3 - 57.6, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (0.555 - 0.569, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (7205 - 8274, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (46649 - 53123, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (1553 - 1829, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (67818 - 70596, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (7289 - 7931, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (25763 - 29311, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (27927 - 73719, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (414 - 473, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (3893 - 4383, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (14215 - 17421, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
系统性能
联想ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD在PCMark10中取得了良好的成绩。它甚至在我们的subnotebook比较组中占据了最高位置。非常好的系统性能可以在日常使用中得到证实。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (5320 - 5720, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (9576 - 10750, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8729 - 9087, n=3) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4891 - 5495, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
PCMark 10 Score | 5720 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (31262 - 33245, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (36338 - 37610, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (25594 - 32670, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U (100 - 120, n=3) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在LatencyMon测试中,我们的联想ThinkPad X13 Gen 2 AMD的测试装置在音频/视频应用中没有遇到任何问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE |
* ... smaller is better
储存
三星PM981a是一款NVMe PCIe 3.0固态硬盘,以M.2-2280格式安装在联想ThinkPad X13 Gen 2 AMD中。这是一款非常快的固态硬盘,但它比ThinkPad X13第二代英特尔型号中的海力士固态硬盘略慢。
还应该提到的是,AMD平台还不支持PCIe 4.0,这是X13 AMD的一个缺点。
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0 | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 23% | -1% | -36% | -95% | -3% | 6% | |
Seq Read | 2936 | 2776 -5% | 2553 -13% | 1657 -44% | 2091 -29% | 2228 -24% | 2412 ? -18% |
Seq Write | 1457 | 1461 0% | 1406 -4% | 642 -56% | 1396 -4% | 1707 17% | 1983 ? 36% |
4K Read | 47.96 | 63.8 33% | 48.53 1% | 39.02 -19% | 49.29 3% | 47.12 -2% | 53.1 ? 11% |
4K Write | 110.6 | 209.4 89% | 119.6 8% | 100.2 -9% | 104.2 -6% | 237.4 115% | 131.1 ? 19% |
4K-64 Read | 903 | 1148 27% | 808 -11% | 672 -26% | 827 -8% | 916 1% | 1201 ? 33% |
4K-64 Write | 1829 | 1623 -11% | 1846 1% | 546 -70% | 1636 -11% | 1245 -32% | 1726 ? -6% |
Access Time Read * | 0.075 | 0.032 57% | 0.062 17% | 0.085 -13% | 0.066 12% | 0.053 29% | 0.05525 ? 26% |
Access Time Write * | 0.034 | 0.019 44% | 0.031 9% | 0.037 -9% | 0.365 -974% | 0.069 -103% | 0.05394 ? -59% |
Score Read | 1244 | 1489 20% | 1112 -11% | 877 -30% | 1086 -13% | 1186 -5% | 1495 ? 20% |
Score Write | 2086 | 1978 -5% | 2107 1% | 710 -66% | 1880 -10% | 1654 -21% | 2055 ? -1% |
Score Total | 3902 | 4178 7% | 3742 -4% | 1994 -49% | 3499 -10% | 3431 -12% | 4303 ? 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
集成的AMD Radeon图形单元,即AMD Radeon RX Vega 7在这种情况下,大大受益于安装在这里的RAM - 毕竟,这个图形芯片没有自己的内存,必须依靠系统的RAM。双通道LPDDR4X-4266实际上是目前可用于内部AMD或英特尔GPU的最佳内存配置。
因此,联想ThinkPad X13第二代AMD领先于X13第1代AMD在GPU性能方面领先,因为联想只为后者提供了DDR4-3200内存。然而,目前ThinkPad X13的最大图形性能只有英特尔可以实现。芯片 X13第二代英特尔配有Iris Xe (96 EUs)在3DMark基准测试中明显领先。
3DMark 11 Performance | 5720 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3338 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1203 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
联想ThinkPad X13第2代与游戏笔记本几乎完全相反。然而,它仍然可以在工作之余偶尔运行一个游戏--前提是相应的游戏是一个较老的游戏,而且细节水平和分辨率没有设置为最大。这台ThinkPad X13 Gen 2 Intel拥有更快的iGPU,更适合游戏,而且它还提供了连接外部GPU的选项,这要归功于Thunderbolt。而AMD的X13第二代产品则缺乏这一选项。
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 96.5, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (13.4 - 36.1, n=41) |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 106 | 91.1 | 27.3 | 11 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 65.5 | 20 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 113 | 88.3 | 51 | 47.4 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 45.1 | 33.5 | 29.1 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 82.4 | 31.4 | 26.2 | 22.2 |
排放。得益于AMD Ryzen 5000,X13 Gen 2运行起来更冷更安静。
噪声排放
即使在最大负荷下,风扇也只产生31.52 dB(a)的安静低语。当然,联想ThinkPad X13第二代AMD在空闲使用时仍然完全无声。幸运的是,对于任何电气噪音也是如此,因为在这款ThinkPad上没有明显的线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.17 / 24.17 / 24.17 dB(A) |
Load |
| 29.92 / 31.52 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.17 dB(A) |
温度
作为典型的办公笔记本电脑,联想ThinkPad X13第二代AMD在空闲时几乎保持完全冷却。虽然这种情况在负载下会发生变化,但这里的温度也保持在限制范围内。最高读数为43.7 °C (~110.7 °F),是在风扇出口上方的机箱顶面测量的。
在压力测试中没有观察到节流现象。当CPU和GPU同时处于满负荷状态时,处理器可以稳定地消耗大约21瓦的功率。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
发言人
你可以在我们的评论中找到关于新的向上发射的扬声器的描述。联想ThinkPad X13第二代英特尔。
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理。Ryzen提供更好的电池寿命
能源消耗
联想ThinkPad X13第2代AMD的低功耗仍然高于英特尔型号的功耗。然而,X13第二代AMD比X13第一代AMD要节俭得多。
一个45瓦的电源适配器也足以满足45.04瓦的最大消耗;附带的65瓦电源适配器提供的能量绰绰有余。
Off / Standby | 0.314 / 0.529 Watt |
Idle | 3.82 / 5.74 / 7.65 Watt |
Load |
35.79 / 45.04 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE R5 PRO 5650U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA R5 PRO 4650U, Vega 6, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | -28% | 3% | -0% | 2% | -19% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.82 | 2.8 27% | 6 -57% | 3.4 11% | 3.9 -2% | 3.3 14% | 4.66 ? -22% | 4.49 ? -18% |
Idle Average * | 5.74 | 5.9 -3% | 8.9 -55% | 6.4 -11% | 5.9 -3% | 5.7 1% | 7.56 ? -32% | 7.66 ? -33% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.65 | 6.8 11% | 11.3 -48% | 8.2 -7% | 6.3 18% | 9.1 -19% | 8.95 ? -17% | 9.56 ? -25% |
Load Average * | 35.79 | 41.5 -16% | 34.2 4% | 29.3 18% | 39.7 -11% | 29.6 17% | 38.7 ? -8% | 46.6 ? -30% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.6 | 34.2 4% | 34.8 2% | 27.7 22% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 45.04 | 68.2 -51% | 37.2 17% | 43 5% | 47.5 -5% | 55.1 -22% | 51.9 ? -15% | 68.6 ? -52% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during our The Witcher 3 test / stress test
电池寿命
联想ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD的内部电池容量增加了;它的容量从上一代的48Wh变成了现在的54.7Wh。因此,与上一代产品相比,电池寿命略有增加。 ThinkPad X13 Gen 1 AMD而联想X13第二代英特尔而联想X13第2代英特尔电脑继续略微领先于这里评论的Ryzen变体。总的来说,X13第二代AMD提供了一个良好的结果,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中超过9小时(150 cd/m²)。即使在最大显示亮度下,它在我们的Wi-Fi测试中仍能运行8小时以上。
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE R5 PRO 5650U, Vega 7, 54.7 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54.7 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA R5 PRO 4650U, Vega 6, 53 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 48.2 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 5% | -13% | 6% | 71% | 12% | 25% | |
H.264 | 814 | 902 11% | 495 -39% | 800 -2% | 925 14% | 896 ? 10% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 556 | 597 7% | 522 -6% | 648 17% | 657 18% | 596 7% | 710 ? 28% |
Load | 86 | 83 -3% | 92 7% | 89 3% | 193 124% | 98 14% | 116.6 ? 36% |
Pros
Cons
结论:联想ThinkPad X13第二代采用红色的CPU而不是蓝色的更好
在我们对采用英特尔处理器的联想ThinkPad X13 Gen 2的评判中,我们说还有一些未使用的潜力。这也可以说是对ThinkPad X13第二代AMD的评价,但它确实比英特尔版本多用了一点潜力。
这方面的原因自然是AMD处理器。Ryzen 5000系列,或者在这种情况下,Cezanne-U系列,与Tiger Lake-U系列相比,只是提供了很多优势--特别是在CPU性能以及更低的热量开发和减少风扇噪音方面。然而,你也必须处理缺点作为回报--稍低的电池寿命,没有Thunderbolt 3,以及较低的GPU性能--在我们看来,这些都没有以任何方式超过其优点。
与AMD合作超过90:更快的Ryzen处理器使已经很好的联想ThinkPad X13第二代更加出色。
这样一来,ThinkPad X13 Gen 2 AMD通过将这一笔记本平台的优势与更快的AMD处理器相结合,能够进一步提高英特尔变体已经非常好的得分。商务用户、学生和其他经常旅行的人将得到一个多功能、装备精良、高质量的副笔记本,只有一些弱点。
除了惠普EliteBooks和戴尔Latitudes的传统竞争形式外,联想ThinkPad X13第二代AMD还需要证明自己,特别是在面对戴尔XPS 13 9310 - 后者具有更紧凑的设计和更明亮的显示屏,但在功能方面也有妥协,而且没有AMD选项。当涉及到高端的内部竞争时,情况看起来很相似--联想ThinkPad X1 Nano。联想ThinkPad X1 Nano也更紧凑,它有更好的显示屏,而且相当轻。作为回报,它几乎没有任何端口,没有AMD CPU,而且价格更高。
价格和可用性
联想目前正在对其ThinkPad X13第二代AMD机型进行大折扣(高达54%的折扣)。在撰写本文时,制造商的在线商店的价格起价约为899美元(AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U,8GB内存,256GB存储)。
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE
-
11/17/2021 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig