联想ThinkPad Z16 G1笔记本电脑评论。强大的AMD旗舰机,有一个小插曲
ThinkPad和AMD--这种组合已经很久没有出现过了。然而,在过去的几年里,这种情况肯定会发生变化,现在,联想ThinkPad Z系列达到了高潮,这是第一个采用Ryzen芯片的高端系列。在今年年初,联想宣布了两种型号和尺寸。我们已经能够测试较小的联想ThinkPad Z13,现在又有了16英寸大显示屏的机型,即联想ThinkPad Z16。
Z13显然将重点放在移动性上,而Z16则针对多媒体领域,应该与笔记本电脑竞争,如戴尔XPS 15 和Apple MacBook Pro 16 ,甚至与联想ThinkPad X1 Extreme ,这是目前联想针对多媒体客户的顶级产品。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 R7 PRO 6850H, Radeon RX 6500M | 1.9 kg | 15.8 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 18.2 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18.2 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3456x2160 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell XPS 17 9720 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 19.5 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2400 | |
93.2 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | 2.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.20" | 3456x2234 | |
92.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU | 2.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.20" | 3456x2234 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
一个紧凑的铝制外壳。联想ThinkPad Z16 G1
与成熟的ThinkPad X1 Extreme系列相比,最大的区别在于设计。虽然 X1 Extreme使用了经典的ThinkPad属性,而ThinkPad Z16的外观则更接近于笔记本市场的主流。它的大触摸板、长方形键盘和银色显示盖,看起来像是XPS或MacBook和ThinkPad之间的混合体。当然联想也会放置自己的点缀,比如说显示盖上的摄像头凸起,用来提升盖子也非常实用。这可以用一只手轻松完成,但只能达到约135度的开启角度。180度,像其他ThinkPads一样,在这里是不可能的。
在材料的选择上,联想也采取了与X1系列不同的路径。显示屏盖由银色铝制成,键盘框架是阳极氧化黑色,底部是黑色漆面。只有显示屏框架是由塑料制成的。另一个有趣的特点是掌托,因为它们是由哑光玻璃制成的。这为Z16创造了一些触觉,比X1 Extreme高一个级别,但这也可能是一个品味问题。至少,Z16肯定会在油腻的表面上有更少的问题。机箱的稳定性也达到了很高的水平,但自然,薄薄的显示屏盖子比底座要弱一些。
ThinkPad Z16是我们比较中最紧凑的16英寸笔记本电脑。戴尔 戴尔XPS 15更小,但它 "只 "提供了一个15.6英寸的LCD。在厚度方面,Z16也是领先的,因为它比其他所有竞争对手都要薄。就其重量而言,所有竞争对手都非常接近。
设备。联想集团,端口选择稀少
连接设备与戴尔XPS 15 9520相同,这使得它成为我们测试领域中最弱的设备之一。 在这一点上,Z16明显落后于ThinkPad X1 Extreme。 ThinkPad X1 Extreme,甚至是 Apple MacBook Pro 16至少提供了HDMI。
与英特尔笔记本电脑相比,AMD没有Thunderbolt 4。另一方面,ThinkPad Z16包括USB 4,它提供与Thunderbolt 3相同的功能。然而,与Thunderbolt配件的兼容性并不保证,必须单独确定。
SD卡阅读器
联想ThinkPad Z16 G1包括一个全尺寸的SD读卡器,但SD卡不能完全插入。读卡器的速度非常快,尤其是在读取数据时。我们用我们的128-GB AV Pro microSD参考卡对此进行了测试。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) |
沟通
联想将内置的高通WCN685x(2x2)标记为 "高通NFA-725A"。它是一个Wi-Fi 6E卡。通过一些细微的变化,ThinkPad Z16使用这种Wi-Fi模块取得了非常好的效果。
我们的测试装置还包括一个来自Quectel的4G模块。如果你需要WWAN,它必须已经包含在你的订单中,因为你不能在以后安装它。
Networking | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
联想在设计上给网络摄像头很大的空间,1080p的摄像头对于笔记本电脑来说也是比较好的。然而,仍有很大的改进空间,智能手机中的自拍器还是要好得多。
安全问题
除了dTMP,联想ThinkPad Z16还包括键盘上的指纹识别器、用于Windows Hello的红外摄像头和Kensington锁。不包括的是智能卡读卡器和物理网络摄像头快门,但你可以通过按F9键来关闭摄像头的电子功能。
辅料
除了带有USB-C接口的135瓦充电器外,没有包括其他配件。
维护
联想使接触ThinkPad Z16第一代的内部非常容易。 在卸下五颗飞利浦螺丝后,你可以直接拆下后盖。不幸的是,升级的选择不多,对于这么大的笔记本电脑,ThinkPad Z16的模块化程度一点也不高。内存和Wi-Fi模块是焊接的,而且只有一个M.2-2280插槽。WWAN卡占用了一个M.2-2242插槽。
当然,你可以清洗风扇或更换电池,但在升级选项方面,ThinkPad笔记本电脑显然让我们失望。戴尔的XPS型号和 ThinkPad X1 Extreme的模块化程度都要高得多。
担保
我们的测试设备是Campuspoint公司的特殊型号,提供非常慷慨的保修方案:36个月的现场服务和 "高级支持"。保修期因国家而异,ThinkPads在美国出售时通常只有一年的保修期。但是,在所有情况下,保修期都可以扩大到五年,还可以通过更换集成电池等服务来升级。此外,Z16还包括作为ThinkPad的国际保修,但在购买国之外没有现场服务。
输入设备。联想ThinkPad中最好的触摸板
键盘
两级背光键盘也更接近笔记本电脑的主流,外侧的按键不再有ThinkPad典型的U型键形式。联想还将键盘整体强行改为矩形,并取消了ThinkPad惯用的方向键的凹槽。连同这一变化,图像上/下键也被取消。最后,联想还调换了Ctrl和Fn键,现在Ctrl键在外面。
提供的按键行程只有1.35毫米(约0.053英寸),按键又比目前许多其他ThinkPad笔记本电脑的按键更细。例如,X1 Extreme 提供1.5毫米(约0.059英寸)。此外,按键的顶部更平坦。这导致打字体验感觉不那么豪华,也不太符合ThinkPad的特点。然而,与戴尔XPS和MacBook Pro相比,该键盘仍然更好,提供了一个清晰明了的压力点,阻力也恰到好处。在28.5厘米(约11.2英寸)处,键盘也有完整的标准宽度。
TrackPad和TrackPoint
不再多说了。Z16拥有目前所有ThinkPad中最好也是最大的TrackPad(12 x 8厘米)。其表面是由哑光玻璃制成的,就像掌托一样。这具有极高的质量,也确保了理想的滑动特性。ClickPad的触觉电机,模拟真实的点击,也非常好。ClickPad可以在任何地方均匀地点击,与通常的机械式TrackPads相比,你只能在底部区域进行点击。凭借其高质量的触觉、软件实现和宽敞的尺寸,ThinkPad笔记本电脑可以非常舒适地使用触摸板进行操作。
与其他ThinkPad相比,舒适度稍差的是没有任何专用按键的TrackPoint。另一方面,如果你必须在打字时快速移动鼠标光标,TrackPoint仍然是一个不错的选择。在这种触觉解决方案中,集成的TrackPoint键比我们之前想象的要好。
ThinkPad Z16 Gen 1: 哑光的WUXGA显示屏,亮度良好
联想几乎总是为其ThinkPad笔记本电脑提供多种显示屏选择,而联想ThinkPad Z16 Gen 1也不例外。买家可以在以下显示屏中选择,这些显示屏的共同点是16:10格式和16英寸对角线。
- IPS WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), 400 cd/m², 哑光, 100% sRGB, 低功率
- IPS WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), 400 cd/m², 半光面, 100% sRGB, 低功耗, 触摸屏
- OLED WQUXGA (3,840 x 2,400), 400 cd/m² (SDR), 半光面, 100% DCI-P3, 触摸, Dolby Vision
与ThinkPad X1 Extreme 相比,突出的是没有2.5K选项(2,560 x 1,600)。用户必须在相当低的分辨率和非常高的分辨率之间进行选择。 在我们的测试装置中,我们有基本选项。这超过了承诺的400cd/m²,因为平均亮度为446cd/m²。
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 487 cd/m²
Contrast: 1571:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 NE160WUM-N62 , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) LP160UQ1-SPB1, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 16" | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 17 9720 Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 17" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Liquid Retina XDR, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 18% | 20% | 25% | 21% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70 | 84.3 20% | 97.8 40% | 94.8 35% | 99.1 42% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 98.3 -1% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.1 | 97.8 36% | 86 19% | 100 39% | 88 22% |
Response Times | -59% | 94% | -24% | -137% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 60 ? -50% | 1.9 ? 95% | 53.2 ? -33% | 42.8 ? -7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 42 ? -68% | 1.9 ? 92% | 28.4 ? -14% | 91.6 ? -266% |
PWM Frequency | 59.52 ? | 17990 ? | 14880 | ||
Screen | -14% | -55% | -23% | 212% | |
Brightness middle | 487 | 639 31% | 381.4 -22% | 438 -10% | 514 6% |
Brightness | 446 | 612 37% | 384 -14% | 411 -8% | 497 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 84 1% | 95 14% | 86 4% | 95 14% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.47 -52% | 0.27 13% | 0.02 94% | |
Contrast | 1571 | 1360 -13% | 1622 3% | 25700 1536% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.2 -22% | 4.34 -141% | 2.5 -39% | 1.4 22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.3 | 5.3 -61% | 9.24 -180% | 6.3 -91% | 2.8 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 1.4 -75% | 0.8 -0% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.7 26% | 2 13% | 4.2 -83% | 2.3 -0% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.31 95% | 2.13 103% | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6867 95% | 6390 102% | 6210 105% | 7034 92% | 6792 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-14% | 20% /
-8% | -7% /
-13% | 32% /
115% |
* ... smaller is better
联想ThinkPad Z16 G1的显示屏在交付状态下已经有了比较好的调整,这表现在它的低Delta-E偏差上。我们使用CalMan和X-Rite i1 Pro 2色度计测量了显示器。使用i1 Profiler进行校准,能够进一步降低Delta-E值,从而实现相当准确的色彩再现。一如既往,创建的颜色配置文件可供您免费下载。
联想的营销承诺100%的sRGB色彩空间覆盖率,而我们测得的是99.7%。有了这个,液晶显示器适合简单的图像处理。为了获得更广泛的色彩空间覆盖,你必须选择可选的OLED面板。
由于其相对较高的亮度和哑光显示表面,ThinkPad Z16笔记本电脑在户外使用没有任何问题,只要你避免阳光直射。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 13 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能。AMD Ryzen 6000H遇上Radeon RX 6500M
ThinkPad Z16第一代的处理器有三种选择,所有的CPU都是AMD针对商业客户的Ryzen Pro系列的一部分。AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 6650H有六个核心,作为入门级,你还可以得到 Ryzen 7 Pro 6850H和Ryzen 9 Pro 6950H,两者都有八个核心。作为图形芯片,你可以使用集成的Radeon GPU或选择获得 AMD Radeon RX 6500M.联想ThinkPad Z16是你能买到的第一台结合了AMD CPU和AMD dGPU的ThinkPad。
在ThinkPad Z系列中,联想使用焊接的LPDDR5-6400内存,其中Z16提供16或32GB的内存。一块M.2-2280固态硬盘作为存储。
测试条件
我们的测试是在困难的条件下进行的,因为Z16给我们带来了一些大问题。我们的第一个测试设备在激活Wi-Fi时不断重启。后来我们收到了一个交换设备,这在很大程度上解决了问题,而且替换的ThinkPad明显更稳定。
在Windows "最佳性能 "模式下,ThinkPad Z16的CPU的短期功率限制为65瓦,从长远来看,处理器可以消耗47瓦。
处理器
的AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850H是2022年Rembrandt一代的处理器,作为H系列的芯片,其典型TDP为45瓦。它的八个核心(16个线程的超线程)的基本时钟速度为3.2 GHz,最高速度为4.7 GHz。关于与其他处理器的一些额外比较,我们推荐我们的 CPU比较列表.
联想ThinkPad Z16 Gen 1是第一款采用AMD-H系列的ThinkPad。在基准测试中,它取得了非常好的性能,尽管它在几个方面仍然落后于竞争对手。 英特尔第12代酷睿i处理器在单核和多核性能方面都更好,尽管在多核性能方面的优势并不持久。除了模拟基准测试外,M1 Pro和Max处理器也有优势。
即使 "超性能 "模式在电池运行中不可用,尽管如此,CPU性能在电池运行中几乎没有变化(在Cinebench R23多核测试中为11963分)。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE -3! | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro -5! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max -5! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (12016 - 12770, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (1469 - 1491, n=2) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (2990 - 4946, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (564 - 583, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (2081 - 2090, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (166.2 - 244, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (235 - 248, n=2) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (52391 - 56498, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (5374 - 5460, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (8093 - 8851, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (1474 - 1481, n=2) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (12.7 - 15.9, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (50.7 - 95.2, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (0.516 - 0.524, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (15009 - 15301, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (93021 - 94997, n=2) | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (3155 - 3169, n=2) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (100724 - 102905, n=2) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (12309 - 12638, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (51299 - 51802, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (60476 - 128243, n=2) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (806 - 809, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (7876 - 8104, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (18157 - 26176, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE |
系统性能
在PCMark 10中,联想ThinkPad Z16 G1位于该领域的中间位置,但在Crossmark中,它更多地处于比较领域的底端。在日常操作中,联想ThinkPad Z16 G1的运行绝对流畅和快速。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Radeon RX 6500M () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Radeon RX 6500M () |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Radeon RX 6500M () |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Radeon RX 6500M () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Radeon RX 6500M () |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Radeon RX 6500M () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Radeon RX 6500M () |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Radeon RX 6500M () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
PCMark 10 Score | 6530 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (30324 - 48504, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (33791 - 42736, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32728 - 51157, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (93.5 - 132.1, n=2) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
我们的测试设备联想ThinkPad Z16 G1有DPC延迟的问题,这可能导致音频和视频处理过程中出现一些下降。这些问题可以通过驱动或固件更新来解决,并且可能因设备而异。
在YouTube测试中几乎没有任何下降,其中CPU和GPU负载也保持极低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
联想ThinkPad Z16 Gen 1中的三星PM9A1固态硬盘提供了1 Terrabyte的存储容量。它是一种M.2-2280固态硬盘,与最新的NVMe PCI-4.0标准相连。在我们的基准测试中的结果描绘了一幅混合的画面。从绝对速度来看,这是一款非常快的固态硬盘,但在我们的比较中,所有其他笔记本电脑都更快,即使差异不是很大。此外,恒定负载下的性能也有差异。
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
联想上次在ThinkPad中使用AMD的专用图形芯片(当时是在 ThinkPad T500仍然使用ATi的品牌),当时iPhone只有一年的历史。当然,联想并没有选择一个非常强大的图形处理器与 AMD Radeon RX 6500M.这款入门级芯片的典型功耗为50瓦,尽管它在ThinkPad Z16中能够消耗55瓦的功率。
凭借这一点,ThinkPad Z16 G1的性能与入门级机型的性能相同。 ThinkPad X1 Extreme搭配NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti和 戴尔XPS 15配备相同的GPU。这也适用于图形性能本身,在3DMarkTime Spy 和Fire Strike 图形基准测试中,RX 6500M的范围与RTX 3050 Ti处于同一水平。
在电池运行情况下,图形性能原来略低,在3DMarkTime Spy (3429分)中降低了约23%。
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 35958 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 51599 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 17548 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 116884 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 92553 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12287 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4795 points | |
Help |
在我们的测试报告中,Blender 3.3的测试是比较新的。在HIP模式下的教室基准测试中,配备了ThinkPad Z16的 Radeon RX 6500M实现了与 戴尔 Inspiron 14 Plus 7420搭配RTX 3050在CUDA模式下的性能相似。而 RTX 3050 Ti在戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7620在这个测试中的表现要好30%左右。在任何情况下,与CPU模式相比,渲染时间都明显减少。
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在合成基准测试中,游戏性能大约是在 戴尔XPS 15 9520配备RTX 3050 Ti的戴尔XPS 15 9520的水平,拥有相同Nvidia芯片的X1 Extreme在游戏中的表现稍好。即使是较新的游戏也可以在高或最高细节设置下再现,但只能在全高清分辨率下进行。AMD Radeon的性能很可能无法满足4K游戏的需要。
你应该注意到,GPU的性能受到了节流的影响。在我们的TheWitcher 3 循环中,FPS率从最初的45下降到只有35 FPS。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6500M () |
F1 2021 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (31.5 - 149.8, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6500M () |
GTA V - 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.9 - 186.1, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6500M (90 - 96.6, n=2) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 154.7 | 144.8 | 96.6 | 41.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 195 | 136.2 | 57.4 | 39.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 121.5 | 106.1 | 102.2 | 94.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 126.6 | 65.8 | 46.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.7 | 40.7 | 36.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 90 | 75 | 71 | 66 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 266 | 119.1 | 98.8 | 86.3 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 137.4 | 66.7 | 46.7 | 37 |
The Division 2 (2019) | 129 | 82 | 67 | 47 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 78.2 | 66.6 | 47.1 | 34.5 |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 124.8 | 68.9 | 57.3 | |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 232 | 101.2 | 57.5 | |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 257.8 | 125.2 | 82.4 | 56.6 |
Death Stranding (2020) | 130.4 | 89.3 | 82.2 | 78.9 |
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 103 | 71 | 59 | 54 |
Crysis Remastered (2020) | 185.6 | 88.7 | 26.3 | 19.6 |
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 91.4 | 53 | 48.7 | |
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 267 | 150.5 | 131.7 | 119.6 |
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 81.1 | 70 | 59.1 | 24.6 |
Dirt 5 (2020) | 159.4 | 72.9 | 56.3 | 37.4 |
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 113 | 62 | 45 | 39 |
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 80.3 | 60.6 | 58.4 | 54.5 |
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) | 89 | 68 | 47 | 41 |
Hitman 3 (2021) | 157.2 | 102.1 | 88.7 | 80.5 |
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) | 82.2 | 75.6 | ||
Days Gone (2021) | 116.3 | 70.6 | 62.7 | 44.2 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 245 | 139 | 105.1 | 42.9 |
New World (2021) | 70.3 | 53 | 46.2 | 40.4 |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 91.7 | 69.8 | 62.5 | 54.5 |
Back 4 Blood (2021) | 116 | 95.3 | 92.7 | |
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 83 | 48 | 47 | 44 |
Riders Republic (2021) | 71 | 68 | 58 | 43 |
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 152 | 101 | 81 | 27 |
Battlefield 2042 (2021) | 129.7 | 71.2 | 53.3 | 23.3 |
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 96.6 | 86 | ||
Halo Infinite (2021) | 62.4 | 43.6 | 42.4 | |
God of War (2022) | 64.5 | 54.1 | 39.6 | 11.9 |
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 96 | 69 | 61 | 34 |
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 58.4 | 46.6 | 37 | |
GRID Legends (2022) | 146.9 | 105 | 75.9 | 59.9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 66.2 | 66.5 | 32.3 | 29.2 |
Elex 2 (2022) | 53.4 | 51 | 44 | 37.6 |
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 72.7 | 71 | 65.5 | 66.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 118.1 | 88.5 | 45.8 | 29.8 |
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 142.7 | 115 | 106.7 | 98.1 |
F1 22 (2022) | 116.3 | 97.2 | 75.6 | 13.9 |
The Quarry (2022) | 64.1 | 48.3 | 38.9 | 25.4 |
排放物。风扇保持安静,但ThinkPad Z16运行时很热
噪声排放
在低负载情况下,联想ThinkPad Z16 G1的风扇运行非常安静,所以你几乎注意不到它。即使是 MacBook Pro 16 mit M1 Pro在这一点上的声音也很小。这种情况在最大负荷下会发生变化,因为此时MacBook会更安静,即使是带有M1 Max的更强大的版本。然而,ThinkPad Z16仍然不是一台吵闹的笔记本电脑,风扇的最大噪音水平仍然大大低于M1 Max。 联想ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4.
我们在Z16中没有注意到任何线圈的啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 25.9 / 46.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 Radeon RX 6500M, R7 PRO 6850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV1T02 | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 512GB | Dell XPS 17 9720 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | -15% | 3% | -11% | 1% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 23.7 | 23.52 1% | 24.7 -4% | 22.8 4% | 24 -1% | 24.7 -4% | 24.2 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 23.52 1% | 24.7 -4% | 22.9 3% | 24 -1% | 24.7 -4% | 24.2 -2% |
Idle Average * | 23.7 | 23.52 1% | 24.7 -4% | 22.9 3% | 24 -1% | 24.7 -4% | 24.2 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.7 | 23.52 1% | 28.1 -19% | 22.9 3% | 24 -1% | 24.7 -4% | 24.2 -2% |
Load Average * | 25.9 | 42.9 -66% | 42.5 -64% | 30.9 -19% | 43.9 -69% | 26.1 -1% | 42.9 -66% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.9 | 52.5 -12% | 46.4 1% | 37.8 19% | 48.4 -3% | 39.5 16% | |
Load Maximum * | 46.9 | 52.45 -12% | 52.1 -11% | 44.7 5% | 48.4 -3% | 37.4 20% | 42.9 9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
联想ThinkPad Z16 Gen 1在空闲运行时保持完全冷却。另一方面,无论是在压力测试还是在Witcher 3 ,ThinkPad Z16在负载下运行时都相当热。我们测量到键盘上方的最高温度为56.8 ºC (~134 ºF)。 尽管你可以很容易地避免触摸这个区域,机箱的其他部分也会明显发热。掌托的最高温度达到36.5 ºC (~98 ºF),感觉明显发热,可能会导致手汗。
在压力测试中,我们的替换测试装置也未能保持稳定。Prime95和FurMark的运行都会导致频繁的突然重启。因此,我们无法包括长达一小时的压力测试。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.3 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.6 °C / 97.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.8 °C / -14.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Radeon RX 6500M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 17 9720 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | 3% | -1% | 12% | 22% | 21% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 56.8 | 49 14% | 51.4 10% | 51.4 10% | 49.5 13% | 41 28% | 42.3 26% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53.3 | 44.4 17% | 55.9 -5% | 51 4% | 38.4 28% | 39 27% | 41.7 22% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.2 | 32.1 -14% | 27.2 4% | 30 -6% | 28 1% | 24 15% | 23.9 15% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.4 | 29.8 -1% | 28.8 2% | 33 -12% | 27.8 5% | 24 18% | 23.9 19% |
* ... smaller is better
演讲者
键盘两边是联想ThinkPad Z16的立体声扬声器。它们相当响亮,甚至有一点低音,但与Apple MacBook Pro 16的扬声器相比,仍有差距。MacBook只是提供了更多的低音和音量。
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.56 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 17 9720 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理。尽管电池很小,但ThinkPad有很好的电池寿命
消耗功率
在这个类别中,联想ThinkPad Z16 G1确实是同类产品中的佼佼者,它的直接竞争对手中没有一个运行效率更高。只有配备M1 Pro的Apple MacBook Pro 16在最低空闲消耗方面略微高效一些。然而,我们也应该在此提到,ThinkPad Z16 Gen 1的显示屏的分辨率明显低于那些对比设备。
135瓦的电源刚刚够大,最大消耗约为133瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.6 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 5.3 / 8.6 / 9.5 Watt |
Load |
65.2 / 133.81 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 R7 PRO 6850H, Radeon RX 6500M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV1T02, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 512GB, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 17 9720 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 3840x2400, 17" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024R, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048R, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" | Average AMD Radeon RX 6500M | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -79% | -80% | -13% | -50% | -17% | -38% | 0% | -18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.3 | 10.3 -94% | 12.3 -132% | 5.5 -4% | 7.8 -47% | 5 6% | 5.4 -2% | 5.3 ? -0% | 6.54 ? -23% |
Idle Average * | 8.6 | 22.06 -157% | 22.8 -165% | 7.2 16% | 15.1 -76% | 15.1 -76% | 16.4 -91% | 8.6 ? -0% | 11.3 ? -31% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.5 | 23 -142% | 13.9 -46% | 16 -68% | 17 -79% | 15.5 -63% | 16.7 -76% | 9.5 ? -0% | 13.3 ? -40% |
Load Average * | 65.2 | 102.57 -57% | 95.4 -46% | 91.8 -41% | 114 -75% | 54 17% | 94 -44% | 65.2 ? -0% | 70.7 ? -8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 93.6 | 106 -13% | 154 -65% | 74.6 20% | 115.2 -23% | 104 -11% | |||
Load Maximum * | 133.81 | 147.8 -10% | 170.7 -28% | 134.7 -1% | 135.6 -1% | 90 33% | 135 -1% | 133.8 ? -0% | 116.1 ? 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
在电池容量方面,联想ThinkPad Z16 G1表现得相对吝啬,只有72瓦特小时。然而,ThinkPad笔记本电脑的电池寿命仍然较好,至少与Windows竞争对手相比是如此。另一方面,它甚至没有接近达到Apple"的数值。 MacBook Pro 16的数值,但它也是我们比较领域中最大的电池。
在Wi-Fi测试中,大约10小时(在150cd/m²的亮度下),Z16不需要隐藏。在最大亮度下,它在我们的自动Wi-Fi测试中仍能持续8小时。然而,这只适用于Z16的WUXGA版本,而可选的4K UHD显示屏应该会大大缩短电池寿命。
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00 R7 PRO 6850H, Radeon RX 6500M, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y50040GE i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -39% | -40% | 23% | 59% | 15% | 2% | |
H.264 | 715 | 402 -44% | 414 -42% | 1048 47% | 1021 43% | 847 ? 18% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 594 | 396 -33% | 406 -32% | 528 -11% | 1016 71% | 894 51% | 640 ? 8% |
Load | 123 | 73 -41% | 68 -45% | 192 56% | 63 -49% | 97.1 ? -21% |
Pros
Cons
结论:联想ThinkPad Z16 G1是一台伟大的笔记本电脑,但...
联想ThinkPad Z16第一代确实让我们有些头疼。从纸面上看,它可能是一台非常好的笔记本电脑,在我们的测试中,这也变成了事实。但是,我们仍然无法给它一个 "非常好 "的推荐。
首先,我们应该列出ThinkPad笔记本电脑的所有积极方面。ThinkPad Z16 G1在一个相对紧凑的外壳中提供了非常好的性能。外壳的质量非常好,加上大量的铝和玻璃掌托的组合,联想在这方面做了很多正确的事情。制造商在触摸板方面也做得很好,明显比其他所有ThinkPads的触摸板要好。键盘也很好,即使它没有其他ThinkPad的键盘那么好。ThinkPad Z16包括一个哑光、明亮的显示屏,并提供良好的电池寿命,尽管电池相对较小。
Z16的第一个大问题是它的连接。ThinkPad Z16是一款16英寸的笔记本电脑,是一款商务设备。这样的设备没有提供USB-A接口,特别是也没有HDMI,这是难以接受的。温度管理也造成了一些困难,因为ThinkPad Z16变得相当热。你最好不要在负载下触摸键盘上方的区域。在一个相对较大的ThinkPad中,我们发现焊接的RAM是一个不必要的限制。一个明显不太重要但仍然相关的抱怨点。Z16缺少一个2.5K显示屏的选项,也没有更高刷新率的显示屏。
如果没有重启的问题,它可能是一台非常好的笔记本电脑,因为除此之外,我们在联想ThinkPad Z16第一代身上看到了许多积极的方面。
但所有这些抱怨并不是让我们头疼的原因--那就是已经提到的重启问题,导致我们要求更换新的测试设备。幸运的是,这个问题在我们更换的测试设备中明显不那么明显,但不幸的是,这个问题仍然发生。
这导致了对ThinkPad Z16的评价明显比它本来应该有的要差。这是不幸的,因为否则我们真的不会不喜欢这款ThinkPad,即使它缺乏的连接设备对于其目标市场来说不如紧凑的ThinkPad Z13那样有说服力。在端口方面,联想ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4 ,明显更灵活。即使是MacBook Pro 16 ,仍然至少提供HDMI,但另一方面,它缺乏ThinkPad Z16的WWAN选项。
注:由于系统稳定性的问题,对ThinkPad Z16的评价结果是降低了3个百分点。
价格和可用性
联想ThinkPad Z16 Gen 1在,起价1,975美元。在联想的网上商店。亚马逊也列出了ThinkPad Z16的各种配置,起价1850美元。(关联链接)。
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 G1 21D5S00T00
- 09/29/2022 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig