Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone在回顾。具有IP认证的商务智能手机

大名鼎鼎的智能手机。

联想可靠的ThinkPad笔记本几乎是个传奇,而ThinkPhone试图从这种声誉中获利。然而,它以目前iPhone的价格搭载了去年的顶级技术。这值得吗?
Android ARM Smartphone ThinkPad
摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone

IBM可能没有发明笔记本电脑,但它确实通过其ThinkPad系列为便携式电脑的胜利做出了决定性的贡献。虽然该品牌现在属于中国制造商联想,但ThinkPad仍然是经典的商务笔记本,有很长的备件供应和现代材料,如碳。

随着摩托罗拉推出的联想ThinkPhone,一款与几乎是传奇的商务笔记本相匹配的智能手机现在正在市场上出现。它拥有特殊的软件功能、由芳纶纤维制成的背部和高水平的安全性,应该特别吸引商务客户。

然而,该系统芯片是上一代产品,而智能手机如小米13 Pro配备更先进的处理器的智能手机目前已进入市场,因此可以从WiFi 7等功能中受益。那么,在ThinkPhone发布时,它是否已经过时了,或者900美元左右的价格在其他方面是否合理?让我们拭目以待。

Motorola ThinkPhone (ThinkPhone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 240 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 158.8 x 74.4
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 65 watt charging, 15 Watt Qi wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @4320p/​30fps, Videos @1080p/​960fps (Camera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2); depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.45, Videos @2160p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, fanless, waterproof
Weight
189 g
Price
1000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
88.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Motorola ThinkPhone
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
89.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Xiaomi 13 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
229 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
89.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Apple iPhone 14
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
172 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
89.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
88.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Honor Magic4 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"2848x1312

据称,联想用于ThinkPhone背面的芳纶纤维比钢铁更坚固、更轻;其图案也让人想起典型的碳纤维产品。背面是哑光的,但仍不能完全抵御指纹和油脂污渍。

联想笔记本电脑的粉丝会很高兴看到经典的ThinkPhone标志,它在背面的右下角旋转了约37度,当然也对应于相应笔记本上的ThinkPad标志。框架是由铝制成的,这种材料也被用于汽车制造。作为对ThinkPad的进一步提醒,联想和摩托罗拉将左边的可自由分配的按钮染成了红色,即与TrackPoint同色,这是一个非常实用的触摸板和鼠标的替代品,只有ThinkPad才有。

正面有大猩猩玻璃Victus保护,手机本身符合IP68和MIL STD 810H的防尘和防水标准。机箱的做工是一流的,给人一种非常高质量的感觉。摩托罗拉ThinkPhone的尺寸也相当轻巧和纤细。

摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone
摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone
摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone
摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone
摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone
摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone
摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 74.7 mm 9.15 mm 215 g162.9 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 229 g161.76 mm 73.5 mm 8.39 mm 198.5 g158.8 mm 74.4 mm 8.3 mm 189 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.8 mm 172 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 没有microSD读卡器

制造商使用256GB的UFS 3.1闪存作为大容量存储,加上8GB的RAM。这符合该价格范围的标准,尽管12GB的内存在其他设备中并不罕见。在中欧,目前只有这一种配置,价格略低于1000欧元,但国际上也有配备更多内存和128GB或512GB数据存储的机型。

用于存储扩展的microSD读卡器缺失,但你可以通过NFC与附近的设备交换数据,因此你也可以使用移动支付服务,例如谷歌支付。USB端口的传输速率高达5GBit/s,因此速度相当快。

底部。SIM卡插槽、USB-C接口、麦克风、扬声器
底部。SIM卡插槽、USB-C接口、麦克风、扬声器
顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风
右边:待机按钮,音量控制
右边:待机按钮,音量控制
左边:可自由分配的按钮
左边:可自由分配的按钮

软件 - 非常多的股票Android 13

摩托罗拉传统上在其智能手机中使用相对不含杂质的Android ,不预装太多的第三方应用程序。ThinkPhone的手机上有来自微软的应用,但这些应用可以顺利卸载。

Android 13是预装的,安全补丁在审查时是2023年2月的,因此是相当最新的。摩托罗拉规定了至少两个月的更新周期,这在我们的审查中得到了证实。安全更新将提供到2027年1月,而且该设备肯定会得到 14。Android

联想和摩托罗拉还强调了其 "ThinkShield for mobile "计划,在该计划中,除其他事项外,还对供应商进行严格检查,并从产品的设计阶段就对安全给予特别关注。Moto Security也预装在设备上,这个应用程序捆绑了所有Android 安全设置,并允许采取额外措施,如智能手机加密或撤销所有应用程序的相机权限。

此外,ThinkPhone还特别适合与PC连接,甚至通过连接显示器、鼠标和键盘来取代PC。它可以通过摩托罗拉的Ready For Apps串联到PC上,ThinkPhone可以被整合为一个网络摄像头,并且可以通过拖放来传输数据。

当然,一个公司的几台设备也可以通过Moto设备管理器进行集中管理。

软件 联想ThinkPhone
软件 联想ThinkPhone
软件 联想ThinkPhone

通信和GNSS--船上有WiFi 6E,但...

ThinkPhone支持WiFi 6E,所以它也可以使用6GHz频段。这在与我们的华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000参考路由器的测试中没有任何问题,但传输速率相对较慢,尤其是在接收方面。尽管我们重复了几次测试,ThinkPhone只达到WiFi 6的速度。发送数据的效果更好,但在这里,也有明显更快的WiFi 6E的智能手机。

另一方面,连接质量很稳定:在路由器附近可以完全接收,即使在10米远的地方,穿过3堵墙,智能手机仍然显示3/4的信号强度,在加载网站时,主观上没有任何缓慢。

该智能手机支持众多的4G和5G网络,因此在国外旅行时应该可以实现无障碍操作。信号质量也非常好;无论在室内还是室外,摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone在我们的测试中总是提供稳定的信号质量。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1369 (720min - 1445max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
881 (446min - 922max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
809 (780min - 871max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
746 (642min - 765max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years)
711 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1499 (1195min - 1604max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
993 (972min - 1016max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
894 (834min - 918max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
839 (531min - 913max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years)
725 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1859 (919min - 1905max) MBit/s +31%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1657 (1379min - 1781max) MBit/s +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)
1443 MBit/s +2%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1416 (876min - 1510max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1637 (1603min - 1672max) MBit/s +108%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1522 (1278min - 1606max) MBit/s +93%
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)
1387 MBit/s +76%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (659min - 925max) MBit/s
080160240320400480560640720800880960104011201200128013601440Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1416 (876-1510)
Motorola ThinkPhone; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø788 (659-925)
户外的GPS测试
户外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

ThinkPhone的定位是通过所有主要的卫星网络进行的,但没有使用SBAS进行更精确的定位。当我们走出家门时,卫星探测非常迅速,我们的位置立即被准确定位,精确度为3米。

当然,我们带着ThinkPhone骑了一次自行车,对其跟踪能力进行了实际测试。这款智能手机显示了与实际骑行路线的微小偏差,但总体来说,它的工作相当准确。因此,它适用于无忧无虑的日常导航。

Garmin Venu 2的本地化 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2的本地化 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2的定位--环路
Garmin Venu 2的定位--环路
Garmin Venu 2的定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2的定位 - 桥梁
摩托罗拉公司对联想ThinkPhone的本地化 - 概述
摩托罗拉公司对联想ThinkPhone的本地化 - 概述
摩托罗拉公司对联想ThinkPhone的本地化 - 环节
摩托罗拉公司对联想ThinkPhone的本地化 - 环节
摩托罗拉公司对联想ThinkPhone的本地化 - 桥梁
摩托罗拉公司对联想ThinkPhone的本地化 - 桥梁

电话和语音质量 - 声音相当平庸

谷歌的电话应用已经预装,但它可以被其他应用取代。ThinkPhone支持所有重要的功能,如VoLTE或VoWiFi,即在紧急呼叫时自动方便地切换到手机网络的VoWiFi模式。

通过内置耳机、扬声器和免提麦克风的语音质量很好,但绝非完美。在所有情况下,我们在测试通话中都会遇到语音略微失真,偶尔会出现短暂的声音中断,而且VoWiFi的音质也没有改善。你能很好地理解对方的意思,而且掉线的情况很少,但我们期待高端手机能有更好的电话质量。

照相机 - ThinkPhone的照片很好

用前置摄像头拍照
用前置摄像头拍照

背面有3个相机镜头,其中只有2个可以真正用于拍照,而第三个只用于提供深度信息。5000万像素主摄像头的传感器来自OmniVision,拍摄的照片色彩强烈,看起来并不夸张。在拍摄近距离物体时,自动对焦有时会出现集中在主要物体上的问题,但照片的整体清晰度令人信服。

在低光照和高对比度的情况下,这款智能手机能够管理一个相对清晰的图像。特别是明亮的区域被很好地调暗,使其不会太亮。然而,总体而言,照片看起来有点暗。

广角摄像头的分辨率为1300万像素。它来自Hynix,第一眼就能拍出漂亮的照片。然而,你不应该把它们放大太多,因为细节变得相当模糊。两个摄像头之间的混合变焦是可能的。

用主摄像头拍摄的视频可以是全高清、4K或8K格式。4K提供了最多的选择:在这里你可以选择是否要以60或30帧的速度录制,以及是否有HDR10+。在取景器中,图像在录制过程中往往会出现抖动,但在最终的材料中看不到这些。针对不同情况的亮度调整可以更流畅一些,但自动对焦反应迅速而可靠。

前面有一个3200万像素的镜头,也来自OmniVision。在光线良好的情况下,它可以拍出体面的自拍,也可以在不损失太多清晰度的情况下放大一点。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - plantMain camera - environmentMain camera - low lightMain camera - wide angle

在实验室里,主摄像头在最佳光线下非常清晰,甚至在图像的边缘也是如此。对比度和细线也能很好地再现。在只有1勒克斯的照明下,我们喜欢这种亮度,但图像仍然相当模糊。

ColorChecker
23.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
18 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola ThinkPhone: 13.75 ∆E min: 2.02 - max: 24.88 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
37 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
47 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
34 ∆E
23 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola ThinkPhone: 35.37 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 51.38 ∆E

配件和保修 - 提供快速充电器

ThinkPhone与一个65瓦的充电器和一条两端各有一个USB-C接口的电缆包装在一起。另外还包括一个SIM卡工具。摩托罗拉的德国在线商店目前没有提供任何专门适用于该设备的配件。

制造商为在欧盟购买的设备提供24个月的保证。这在其他地区和国家可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

通过MotoCare,你可以在三个不同阶段延长和扩大保修期。以英国为例,在摩托罗拉的网站上,目前最高级别的价格约为63.99英镑,并有2年的意外损坏保护。

输入设备和操作 - 由于144赫兹,速度非常快

非常灵敏的144赫兹屏幕和快速的处理器使得在菜单内的操作几乎是瞬息万变。待机按钮和音量摇杆有点窄,长期使用起来不是很舒服,但它们有高质量的手感和良好的压力点。

机壳左侧的可自由分配的按钮由于其棱角分明的表面,很容易被发现,按一次或两次就可以用于不同的命令。

指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕后面,但在机箱内非常靠下,所以只有手大的人才能不费吹灰之力够到它。该传感器能够非常可靠地识别指纹,并几乎立即解锁智能手机。

通过面部识别解锁也非常迅速和可靠,但由于缺乏额外的硬件,这并不像其他方法那样能很好地防止被操纵。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 高质量的OLED屏幕

子像素网格
子像素网格

ThinkPhone配备了OLED屏幕,支持HDR 10+,扩展的全高清分辨率和高达144Hz的帧速率。在我们用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中,这块屏幕的亮度值超过1000cd/m²,表现不错,但如果有必要,小米13 Pro还能多出一些烛光。

由于自发光二极管的存在,亮度非常均匀。

在我们的测试中检测到了PWN。在175.4赫兹的情况下,这肯定会导致敏感的人在低亮度下使用屏幕时出现头痛等问题。这个问题可以通过 "防止闪烁 "选项来缓解,但如果你对这个范围内的敏感度有意见,我们建议在购买前先试一下屏幕。

1007
cd/m²
1011
cd/m²
1066
cd/m²
1003
cd/m²
1023
cd/m²
1041
cd/m²
1006
cd/m²
1018
cd/m²
1040
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1066 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1023.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1023 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.266
Motorola ThinkPhone
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi 13 Pro
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Apple iPhone 14
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Honor Magic4 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"
Screen
14%
-6%
5%
-39%
Brightness middle
1023
1230
20%
835
-18%
1020
0%
956
-7%
Brightness
1024
1244
21%
841
-18%
1020
0%
959
-6%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
97
3%
96
2%
94
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.38
1
28%
1.05
24%
1
28%
2.4
-74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.76
2.8
-1%
2.81
-2%
2.8
-1%
5.2
-88%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.8
14%
2.6
-24%
2.1
-0%
3.3
-57%
Gamma
2.266 97%
2.24 98%
2.034 108%
2.29 96%
2.26 97%
CCT
6428 101%
6446 101%
6616 98%
6502 100%
6804 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 175.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 175.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 175.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100%的亮度
100%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
0%的亮度
0%的亮度

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

在我们使用光谱光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中,我们确定了 "自然 "色彩配置文件中非常准确的色彩再现。sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率非常好。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于采用了OLED屏幕,屏幕内容非常清晰,即使在陡峭的可视角度下也是如此。

这款智能手机在户外的表现相当不错,屏幕内容在阳光直射和反光下仍然清晰可辨。

视角稳定
视角稳定
户外使用
户外使用

性能 - 不再是最新的,但速度很快

高通骁龙8+第一代是去年的一款高端处理器,因此与目前的 骁龙8代2中的 小米13 Pro在基准测试中可以看到,但这些只可能被那些在智能手机上使用要求极高的应用程序或做大量多任务的人注意到。

总的来说,几乎没有任何东西可能将联想ThinkPhone带到它的极限:在大多数情况下,性能足以使其顺利运行。然而,不得不说的是,8GB内存的稀缺性使我们的测试设备在基准测试中损失了一些分数,这一点在与摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra的直接比较中可以看出 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1732 Points +31%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1499 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1327 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=25)
1281 Points -3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1226 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5201 Points +22%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4733 Points +11%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4278 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=25)
4167 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -19%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3377 Points -21%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1277795 Points +45%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=23)
997431 Points +13%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
940036 Points +7%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
881453 Points
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
829792 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -8%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17340 Points +8%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
16072 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 20841, n=24)
15090 Points -6%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
14789 Points -8%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14283 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=198, last 2 years)
13154 Points -18%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points +37%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1180 Points +32%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points +23%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1079 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=23)
1033 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years)
917 Points +2%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
896 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8164 Points +17%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7567 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=23)
7450 Points +7%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7376 Points +6%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6980 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13412 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=23)
11726 Points +3%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
11438 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10990 Points -4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10786 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
Memory
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8777 Points +47%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7806 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=23)
7492 Points +26%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7232 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points +18%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
5963 Points
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
Graphics
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
22986 Points 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
22976 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21737 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16194 - 26660, n=23)
21146 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19247 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1960 Points +29%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1758 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=23)
1699 Points +12%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1665 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points +4%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1515 Points
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
80599 Points +454%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=21)
43831 Points +202%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +23%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15778 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14572 Points 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14536 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (887 - 147801, n=11)
37778 Points +3461%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +2286%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1354 Points +28%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1061 Points

ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺730对于大多数图形密集型的应用程序来说,其尺寸足够大,并提供了高性能的储备。即使是图形性能的 iPhone 14也无法跟上。在这里,高端设备之间的差异在日常使用中也不太可能被发现。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3784 Points +37%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2776 Points 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2771 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points -7%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3843 Points +35%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
3005 Points +6%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2838 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points -1%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2639 Points -7%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13984 Points +26%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
11779 Points +6%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11138 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points -1%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10317 Points -7%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5857 Points +9%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5353 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3801 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20640 Points +7%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19287 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18581 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13223 Points +8%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12214 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9968 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
497 fps +6%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
468 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
446.6 fps -5%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
439 fps -6%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +20%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
275 fps
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
253 fps -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps -14%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps -34%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -9%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps +21%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
184 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
172.4 fps -6%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps -18%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +2%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps -31%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -33%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
126 fps +22%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
105.2 fps +2%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
57.6 fps -15%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -25%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -34%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +33%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +13%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
38.2 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -21%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -36%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps +27%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
124 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -4%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
111.1 fps -10%

ThinkPhone在加载大型网页时速度很快,滚动时你只需要为图片等待很短的时间。总的来说,有的智能手机加载网站的速度要快一些,但总的来说,用我们的测试设备上网是很有乐趣的。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
189.85 Points +55%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
137.873 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)
125.2 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +2%
Motorola ThinkPhone (Chrome 110)
122.328 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
117.894 Points -4%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
77.337 Points -37%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
341 runs/min +228%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18)
119.6 runs/min +15%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
110.9 runs/min +7%
Motorola ThinkPhone (Chome 110)
104 runs/min
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
99.2 runs/min -5%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
65.5 runs/min -37%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
188 Points +72%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
157 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=21)
113.9 Points +4%
Motorola ThinkPhone (Chrome 110)
109 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
101 Points -7%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
71 Points -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
65726 Points +73%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
42544 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)
42193 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +1%
Motorola ThinkPhone (Chrome 110)
38083 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
37098 Points -3%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
27730 Points -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -36%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
1440.1 ms * -29%
Motorola ThinkPhone (Chrome 110)
1115.9 ms *
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
1104 ms * +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)
1023 ms * +8%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
690.6 ms * +38%
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
496.4 ms * +56%

* ... smaller is better

ThinkPhone配备了UFS 3.1存储,这当然能确保快速复制和短时加载。然而,总的来说,存储控制器并没有像许多其他高端智能手机那样出色地完成其工作。

设备,如小米13 Pro甚至配备了UFS 4.0存储,使数据吞吐量翻倍。

Motorola ThinkPhoneXiaomi 13 ProMotorola Edge 30 UltraHonor Magic4 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
86%
15%
7%
-2%
7%
Sequential Read 256KB
1504.2
3587.83
139%
1717.77
14%
1868.5
24%
Sequential Write 256KB
1026.6
2601.45
153%
1363.58
33%
1367.48
33%
Random Read 4KB
347.4
387.72
12%
349.08
0%
268.76
-23%
Random Write 4KB
395
546.98
38%
446.25
13%
366.13
-7%

游戏--联想ThinkPhone让人玩得开心

游戏玩家应该对摩托罗拉的ThinkPhone感到满意,这一点从我们的测试和使用GameBench在流行游戏中确定的帧率中可以看出。软件确定的流行游戏的帧率。

虽然144赫兹的屏幕在大多数游戏中没有被利用,但在《PUBG》或《暗黑破坏神:不朽》中,无论是低设置还是高设置,你都能获得相当稳定的60帧。PUBG中的超高清只能在40帧下实现,但这里的帧率也相当稳定。

在我们测试的所有游戏中,通过触摸屏和位置传感器进行的控制都非常可靠。

摩托罗拉还安装了一个游戏覆盖,提供快速设置,据说可以提高游戏的性能或触摸屏的灵敏度,例如。在我们的测试中,当它被激活时,我们没有注意到任何差异,但对于要求非常高的游戏者来说,小的改进肯定会有影响。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.4.0: Ø59.9 (59-60)
Motorola ThinkPhone; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.4.0: Ø59.9 (57-60)
Motorola ThinkPhone; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.4.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)
Motorola ThinkPhone; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 1.7.4: Ø59.9 (59-60)
Motorola ThinkPhone; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 1.7.4: Ø59.8 (57-60)

排放--商务电话发热

温度

用户应准备好在负载下的高温;我们在背部测得的最高温度为46.4℃。在炎热的环境温度下,这个温度可能会更高。

正如3DMark基准测试的压力测试所显示的那样,这款商务智能手机在高负荷下的性能会很快被扼杀,此时它只能提供大约70%的可能功率。没有其他智能手机配备Snapdragon 8 Gen 1骁龙8+ Gen 1的其他智能手机都无法在这里提供更好的数值。

摩托罗拉仍然合理地控制了ThinkPhone的节流问题。在以下情况下小米13 Pro中,你可以看到高通公司在后续产品中也解决了这个问题,即 骁龙8代2.

Max. Load
 46.1 °C43.3 °C40.3 °C 
 46.1 °C42.5 °C39.8 °C 
 46.1 °C43.1 °C39.8 °C 
Maximum: 46.1 °C
Average: 43 °C
38.6 °C42.5 °C43.2 °C
38.8 °C42.6 °C46.4 °C
38.9 °C43.2 °C45.2 °C
Maximum: 46.4 °C
Average: 42.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
84.1 % +19%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.1 % +17%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70.8 %
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.3 % -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % -16%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.2 % +27%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
75.5 % +9%
Motorola ThinkPhone
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.2 %
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.1 % -9%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.6 % -10%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.4 (11.8-17)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø21.1 (19.4-22)
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14 (13.2-17.5)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø13 (10.6-16.7)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø11.1 (9.89-15.8)
Motorola ThinkPhone Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (44.4-62.8)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73.8 (64.6-77.7)
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.9 (48.4-57.6)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø44.1 (36.4-61.1)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.7 (38.3-58.6)
热成像:背面
热成像:背面
热成像:正面
热成像:正面

发言人

ThinkPhone配备了立体声扬声器,而屏幕上方的听筒则作为第二个扬声器使用。声音本身很饱满,但并不完全清晰:声音听起来总是有点不干净,即使是在较低的音量下。乐器很容易分辨。

可通过蓝牙或USB-C连接的外部音频设备可能产生更清晰的音质。所有常用的编解码器都可用于无线音频传输,包括aptX自适应和LHDC V3/V4。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.6372537.136.6312832.34032.932.15031.838632628.78022.925.110021.134.512523.738.716018.244.320013.347.825014.554.531512.860.640011.461.950011.766.463010.964.480015.268.6100012.270.8125012.871.8160010.972.6200010.972.6250011.675.731501275.5400012.970.1500013.667.6630014.367.3800015.167.61000015.765.41250016.561.91600017.459.8SPL25.483.5N0.755.3median 13.3median 66.4Delta2.37.83937.824.42620.424.718.322.230.731.425.525.823.925.618.124.22032.225.246.816.848.614.452.51755.411.857.812.958.314.656.713.666.812.270.913.673.213.875.813.477.413.479.613.479.613.580.113.478.613.574.513.273.513.570.913.668.713.37225.988.50.768.6median 13.5median 70.91.79.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola ThinkPhoneHonor Magic4 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola ThinkPhone audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor Magic4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 快速充电和良好的耐力

消耗功率

在功耗方面,有更经济的智能手机。特别是在负载下,ThinkPhone变得相当耗电。

附带的充电器可以管理高达65瓦的电量,智能手机也支持这个最大的充电速率。这给了你几个百分点,即使手机只是短暂地连接到充电网络。给电池充满电需要不到一个小时。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Load midlight 6.8 / 8.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola ThinkPhone
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
15%
19%
-5%
-6%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
1
1.02
-2%
0.74
26%
0.87
13%
1.006 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=21)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.36
3%
1.84
-31%
2.04
-46%
1.834 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=21)
-31%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
1.58
12%
1.86
-3%
2.26
-26%
1.984 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=21)
-10%
Load Average *
6.8
4.29
37%
2.75
60%
4.97
27%
5.68 ?(2.75 - 15, n=21)
16%
Load Maximum *
8.2
6.15
25%
4.54
45%
7.46
9%
8.44 ?(4.54 - 15, n=21)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.72 (3.31-8.97)
Motorola ThinkPhone; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.2 (1.059-1.61)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.91 (8.87-8.94)
Motorola ThinkPhone; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.2 (1.059-1.61)

电池寿命

在我们的WLAN测试中,屏幕亮度为150cd/m²的脚本加载网站直到电池耗尽,联想智能手机能做到15:46分钟。对于一款Android 的智能手机来说,这是一个非常好的价值,但iPhone 14在电池寿命方面无法击败ThinkPhone。

强大的5000毫安时电池当然有助于ThinkPhone在所有其他测试中提供适合日常使用的数值,因此与许多其他高端智能手机相比,它的使用寿命更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
35h 30min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 54min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 56min
Motorola ThinkPhone
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Apple iPhone 14
3279 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-12%
9%
1%
-13%
Reader / Idle
2130
1509
-29%
2689
26%
2206
4%
1346
-37%
H.264
1194
1263
6%
1266
6%
1188
-1%
995
-17%
WiFi v1.3
946
846
-11%
1010
7%
872
-8%
687
-27%
Load
296
254
-14%
289
-2%
323
9%
389
31%

Pros

+ 高品质的机箱
+ 标志性的ThinkPad设计
+ 库存Android
+ 全面的PC集成
+ 可自由分配的按钮
+ 真彩色OLED显示屏
+ 良好的相机质量
+ 良好的运行时间
+ 存储速度快
+ 良好的定位精度
+ IP认证

Cons

- 语音质量可以更好
- 高温
- 相对较慢的WiFi

结论 - 大名鼎鼎,非常体面的手机

在审查中。摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone。
在审查中。摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone。

当然,摩托罗拉推出的联想ThinkPhone得益于著名的ThinkPad名字,制造商没有浪费任何机会来宣传这款智能手机是其受欢迎的笔记本系列的完美伴侣。但由于无线应用流、Windows集成和摩托罗拉ReadyFor,ThinkPhone也能与任何其他Windows笔记本电脑很好地配合。如果需要的话,如果你连接了鼠标、键盘和显示器,这款手机甚至可以取代PC。

ThinkPhone本身也是一个工作母机,它不仅有很好的防风雨功能,而且由于它的凯夫拉表面和修改后的标志性标志而显得很突出,不会显得太过俏皮。在我们的测试中,我们非常喜欢这款智能手机的做工和稳定性。

事实上,ThinkPhone不得不使用去年的SoC,这使它失去了一些功能,如WiFi 7,但价格仍在合理范围内。即便如此,这款手机的速度对大多数应用程序来说也足够快。在电池寿命方面,这款智能手机也因其强大的电池而得分,充电技术为长时间的工作负荷提供了足够多的电量。

联想ThinkPhone是一款无愧于传奇名字的时尚手机,它专注于稳定性和安全性,而不是顶级性能。

那些想要更快的充电速度并且可以不做防水处理的人应该看一下 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra。同时,它的价格也急剧下降。如果你想要最先进的技术,你应该看一下 小米13 Pro它有极快的存储和快速的WiFi。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

摩托罗拉的ThinkPhone似乎并没有在全球范围内广泛销售。根据网上报道,该机型预计将于3月/4月在北美和其他地区推出。在英国,它可以通过Motorola联想售价899.99英镑。

Motorola ThinkPhone - 03/10/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 72%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
70 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
90 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
75%
Average
83%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉的联想ThinkPhone在回顾。具有IP认证的商务智能手机
Florian Schmitt, 2023-03-11 (Update: 2024-08-15)