Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra评论。第一款拥有200MP摄像头的智能手机

终于又是高端的了。

摩托罗拉在Edge 30 Ultra中释放了一个高端领域的潜在便宜货：20万像素的三摄像头，快速的SoC，强大的电池，良好的更新供应，以及所有这些不到900美元的价格。有什么可能出错呢？
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

摩托罗拉已经很久没有发布高端智能手机了。话说回来，这个前行业巨头去年在其阵容中也有一款强大的预算旗舰，其形式是 Edge 20 Pro的形式，继而又推出了Edge 30 Pro今年的Edge 30 Pro。

通过其Ultra模型，摩托罗拉又向前迈进了一步，通过使用更好的显示屏和更强大的摄像头，将这个系列提升到高端类别。最重要的是，重点是主摄像头的新200MPix传感器。

以900美元左右的价格，这款智能手机仍然比大多数竞争对手便宜得多。是否有缺陷或这只是一个强大的性价比的案例，将在下面的评论中揭示。

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Edge Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 730
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitive, pOLED, 3D-curved, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, HDR10+, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 237 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, digital Compass, Accelerometer, Orientation, Rotation, G-Sensor, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.39 x 161.76 x 73.5
Battery
4610 mAh Lithium-Ion, 125W-TurboPower-Charging, 50W Wireless Charging, 10W Wireless PowerShare
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix (Samsung HP1, 1/1.22", 0.64 µm, f/1.9, OIS) + 50 MPix (Samsung JN1, Ultra wide/Macro, 114°, 1/2.76", 0.64 µm, f/2.2) + 12 MPix (Sony IMX663, 2x Tele, 1/2.93", 1.22 µm, f/1.6); 8k-Video; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 60 MPix (OmniVision OV60A, Quad-Pixel, 0.61 µm, f/2.2); 4k-Video
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 125W-Charger, Clear-Case, USB-C-Cabel, Quick-Start-Guide, SIM-Tool, Display-Protection-Cover, My UX, ThinkShield for Mobile, 12 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 0.89 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.26 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C); DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
198.5 g, Power Supply: 193 g
Price
900 Euro
Links
Motorola homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
89.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
89.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920		228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
88.8 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		225 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
87.7 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Sony Xperia 1 IV
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"3840x1644
88.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Honor Magic4 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"2848x1312
88.5 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Vivo X80 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"3200x1440

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra拥有6.67英寸显示屏，并不属于最小的智能手机代表，但还是非常薄。这种印象因其圆润的纵向边缘而得到进一步加强，智能手机拿在手里感觉很舒服。此外，其重量仅有不到200克。即使是 Vivo X80 Pro也比它重16克，甚至比 iPhone 14 Pro Max也重达41克。

做工令人印象深刻。正面安装了康宁大猩猩5号玻璃用于保护，而背面则使用了一种未指定的哑光玻璃，事实证明它完全可以防止指纹。纤细的铝边给人以稳定的印象，玻璃和铝之间的缝隙紧密而平齐。Edge 30 Ultra能轻松应对扭转的压力。

底部的SIM卡槽几乎与边框无缝连接，并且坐得更深一些。摩托罗拉智能手机通过了IP52认证，这意味着它可以防止有害的灰尘和水溅入。但它既不防尘也不防水。Edge 30 Ultra有星际黑和星光白两种颜色可供选择。

尺寸比较

❌
164.57 mm 75.3 mm 9.1 mm 215 g165 mm 71 mm 8.2 mm 185 g163.6 mm 74.7 mm 9.15 mm 215 g163.2 mm 75 mm 9.1 mm 225 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g161.76 mm 73.5 mm 8.39 mm 198.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra中的USB 3.2

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra拥有一个USB 3.2端口（Gen. 1），可以实现高达5GBit/s的高数据传输率，以及有线图像传输。由于有OTG，外部存储媒体和外围设备可以连接到智能手机上，或者它可以作为其他设备的PowerBank。

没有microSD插槽，也没有音频插孔、无线电接收器或红外发射器。在德国，只有12GB内存和256GB内部存储的存储配置可供选择，该配置配有蓝牙5.2和NFC。

顶面：麦克风
顶面：麦克风
左侧
左侧
右侧：音量摇杆、电源
右侧：音量摇杆、电源
底侧：扬声器、麦克风、USB、SIM卡
底侧：扬声器、麦克风、USB、SIM卡

软件--Edge 30 Ultra与Android 12和三个更新。

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra配备了Android 12和My UX。用户界面没有任何重大的设计变化，但它确实提供了一些软件增强功能，如用两根手指敲击动作来激活手电筒，用三根手指快速截图，或游戏工具应用。

摩托罗拉承诺为Edge 30 Ultra提供三个大型Android 更新和四年的安全补丁。在审查时，我们的智能手机上安装的安全补丁是2022年9月1日的，因此是最新的。

通信和GNSS - 5G Sub6和快速WLAN在Moto智能手机中的应用

由于广泛的频率支持，摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra非常容易访问移动互联网，并掌握了所有当前的标准，但5G毫米波除外。

这款智能手机在WLAN中也表现得完美无缺，甚至支持Wi-Fi 6E。通过我们的华硕ROG Rapture GE-ATX11000参考路由器的数据传输率很高，而且大多很稳定。在日常使用中，6Ghz网络的波动几乎不会被察觉。

Networking
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
881 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
839 (min: 531) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1657 (min: 1379) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
948 (min: 929) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
941 (min: 880) MBit/s ∼59%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1226 (min: 590) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1590 (min: 1449) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1748 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1459 (min: 723) MBit/s ∼86%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1369 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1499 (min: 1195) MBit/s ∼94%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1383 (min: 1126) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1328 (min: 378) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼81%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1379-1781)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1676 (852-1767)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1278-1606)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1694 (1642-1735)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø865 (446-922)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø715 (539-791)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø839 (531-913)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø510 (311-704)
GPS测试：在室内
在室内
GPS测试：户外
在户外
GPS测试。支持GNSS
全球导航卫星系统

对于定位，摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra使用目前所有的卫星网络，最多有三个频段。室内定位的功能也非常迅速和精确。

在一次小型自行车骑行中，我们将智能手机的追踪能力与 Garmin Venu 2.记录的总距离偏离了约90米，详细的路线令人信服。

GNSS试骑：环湖
GNSS试骑：环湖
GNSS试骑：循环
GNSS试骑：循环
GNSS试骑：总结
GNSS试骑：总结

电话和语音质量

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra有三个麦克风，在相当大的环境下将其放在耳边时，可以提供水晶般清晰的语音质量。背景噪音被可靠地过滤掉了，但说话者的声音偶尔会出现小的失真。这些失真在嘈杂的背景噪音中变得更糟，而实际的原因是听不出来的。只要与智能手机的距离不是很远，扬声器模式的功能就非常好。在距离智能手机两米左右的地方，只能非常安静地听到扬声器。

Edge 30 Ultra支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。最多可以插入两张Nano SIM卡，但缺乏eSIM支持。

照相机--成熟的三摄像头，200MPix。

与摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra自拍
与摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra自拍

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra以大量的百万像素出场，所有的摄像头加起来共达322MPix。 单是前置摄像头就占了60MPix。用这个摄像头拍摄的自拍被减少到15.1MPix，但需要超过7MB的存储空间。即使在弱光下，质量也令人印象深刻，预设的美颜模式也非常谨慎地工作。视频可以用30FPS的超高清录制。

重点是三星Edge 30 Ultra的主摄像头的200MPix传感器，它将16个独立的像素组合成一个超级像素，大小为2.56微米。然后输出大小为12.6MPix的图像文件。如果你想拍摄全尺寸的照片，你必须不使用大多数图像增强算法，并耐心等待约2.5秒，直到图片处理完毕。然后，结果会占用大约32MB的内存。Moto智能手机还有一个专业模式，允许拍摄RAW照片，但这些照片又被限制在12.6MPix（约26MB）。

照片质量是可以接受的，即使图像在边缘处略显模糊。白平衡也有点冷。细节被精细地再现，没有过度的锐化。然而，如果能多一点动态就更好了。

更令人高兴的是，这两个额外的镜头不仅仅是装饰性的配件。超广角镜头也可以作为微距镜头，并且由于其高分辨率，提供了良好的景深。这里还使用了像素分档，因此在原来的5000万像素基础上只剩下12.6万像素。第三个镜头是一个双光学放大镜，不幸的是在这个价格范围内不再是强制性的，但确实没有自己的OIS。为数字变焦提供了高达16倍的放大率。

在视频方面，摩托罗拉智能手机有很多东西可以提供，以8k记录，最好是30FPS，但对于那些满足于超高清的人来说，60FPS也是可以的。屏幕比例可以是16:9或全屏，这是一种不寻常的视频格式，为20:9。那些想用HDR10+录制视频的人将被限制在4k/30 FPS。在全高清状态下，慢动作可以达到960FPS。所给的质量很好，但我们希望拍摄时有更多的灵活性。24 FPS至少应该是可能的，更不用说PAL格式或21：9。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light
orginal image
click to load images

我们在受控的照明条件下检查了摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra的主摄像头。测试图的特点是图像中心的细节水平非常高。即使是最小的字体也仍然清晰可辨，尽管小的畸变在这里和那里蠕动。边缘的锐利度下降，但没有达到一个过度的程度。

这里的白平衡非常好，但有几种颜色，深棕色和深绿色，显示出与目标的高度偏差。

ColorChecker
16.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 30 Ultra: 7.88 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 18.07 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
51 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
47 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
34 ∆E
23 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 30 Ultra: 35.39 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 51.38 ∆E

配件和保修 - 保修期可延长

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra的大包装暗示，它包含的内容在某种程度上不仅仅是一部智能手机。其中包括一个125瓦的充电器、一根USB-C电缆、一个SIM卡工具、一个透明的硅胶保护套、一份多语言快速入门指南和另一本包含保修条件和安全说明的小册子。一个积极的方面是，包装没有使用塑料。

在德国，保修期为24个月。这可以延长一年（+60欧元），智能手机可以选择投保两年的意外保险（高达135欧元）。这包括显示屏损坏和水渍，最多可以提交两次索赔，不需要额外费用。

对于国际读者。保修条款和保险选项可能因国家而异，所以购买前一定要向你的供应商咨询。

输入设备和操作 - Edge 30 Ultra中的光学指纹

电容式触摸屏配有屏幕保护膜，它被整齐地贴在上面，但没有覆盖整个正面玻璃。滑动质量很好，但不像玻璃表面那样令人信服。然而，触摸屏对输入的反应非常迅速和准确，这当然是由于360赫兹的相当高的采样率。

生物识别安全由显示屏上的光学指纹扫描仪提供，它可以非常可靠地识别存储的指纹并快速解锁。另外，也可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，但安全性较低。

Edge 30 Ultra提供了各种手势和单手模式，其工作原理就像iPhone.

显示屏 - 明亮的OLED，最高可达144赫兹

子像素网格
子像素网格

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra的6.67英寸（16.94厘米）大型POLED显示屏采用全高清+，刷新率高达144 Hz。然而，后者只有在设置中永久启用时才会激活。如果选择自动模式，系统会在60、90和120赫兹之间改变刷新率。

面板的亮度非常好，纯白显示超过1,000cd/m²。由于亮区和暗区的均匀分布（APL18），屏幕中心的数值达到了1322cd/m²。这也确保了HDR内容的鲜艳显示。在这方面，Edge 30 Ultra支持HLG、HDR10和HDR10+标准。在手动控制中，最高可达到501 cd/m²。

这款智能手机的POLED显示出典型的闪烁现象。在最低亮度下，这在180和720赫兹之间波动得相当不稳定。敏感的用户可以使用直流调光模式，该模式在面板亮度较低时能稳定地工作在90 Hz。在显示屏亮度的69%以上，只能测量到与刷新率相等的频率。没有检测到时间上的抖动。为此，我们用显微镜和240 FPS慢动作视频（深灰色，全亮度）检查了显示器。

1004
cd/m²		1022
cd/m²		1037
cd/m²
1004
cd/m²		1020
cd/m²		1035
cd/m²
1001
cd/m²		1018
cd/m²		1039
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1039 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1020 cd/m² Minimum: 4.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1020 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8"		Xiaomi 12S Ultra
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Sony Xperia 1 IV
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5"		Honor Magic4 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"		Vivo X80 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.8"
Screen
10%
-7%
6%
-50%
11%
Brightness middle
1020
1077
6%
831
-19%
890
-13%
956
-6%
938
-8%
Brightness
1020
1093
7%
807
-21%
897
-12%
959
-6%
947
-7%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
91
-5%
97
1%
94
-2%
97
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
1.03
-3%
0.9
10%
2.4
-140%
0.9
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
2
29%
3.06
-9%
2.4
14%
5.2
-86%
1.9
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.3
38%
1.8
14%
1.4
33%
3.3
-57%
1.3
38%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.37 93%
2.233 99%
2.21 100%
2.26 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
6502 100%
6526 100%
6396 102%
6320 103%
6804 96%
6518 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 720 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 720 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 720 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

当选择自然色彩配置文件时，摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra的显示屏上会实现最自然的色彩表现。它的特点是饱和度柔和，色彩准确。只有白平衡不是最佳状态，显示出微妙的绿色色调，这在日常使用中并不令人讨厌。

灰度（色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（颜色配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（颜色配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4105 ms rise
↘ 0.3895 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.472 ms rise
↘ 0.4795 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

摩托罗拉的Edge 30 Ultra在户外给人留下了非常好的印象。由于其大的亮度储备，即使在明亮的日子里也很容易阅读，特别是由于环境光传感器对强烈的阳光有快速反应。

在秋天的阳光下
在秋天的阳光下
在阴凉处
在阴凉处

我们非常喜欢摩托罗拉智能手机的可视角度稳定性。在任何位置都不会出现颜色失真。即使在非常平坦的视角下，亮度也只是略有下降，而且显示屏的温度较低。

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra的可视角度稳定性
摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra的可视角度稳定性

性能 - 强大的Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1在Moto智能手机上的应用

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra由Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ，由12GB的LPDDR5 RAM支持。该SoC在基准测试中处于预期水平。

在安兔兔中，Moto智能手机获得了7位数的分数，并在比较领域中占据领先地位。它在PCMark和Basemark OS II中也处于最高位置，仅被小米12S Ultra打败。小米12S Ultra在CrossMark中，在系统性能方面仅被小米12S Ultra击败。

然而，人工智能基准测试出乎意料地弱；我们期望在AImark和Procyon中取得更好的结果。


Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1325 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=25)
1281 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1237 Points -7%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1234 Points -7%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1226 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4399 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=25)
4167 Points -2%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3685 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3489 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -19%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3377 Points -21%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1057309 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=23)
997431 Points -7%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
944782 Points -12%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
940036 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
692924 Points -35%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17340 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 20841, n=24)
15090 Points -13%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14283 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14267 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13983 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points -27%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10140 Points -42%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1165 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1079 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=23)
1033 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
990 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -17%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
879 Points -20%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8164 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7567 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=23)
7450 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7277 Points -11%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7085 Points -13%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7068 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points -23%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13412 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=23)
11726 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11338 Points -15%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10990 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -23%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10047 Points -25%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9765 Points -27%
Memory
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8777 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7806 Points -11%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7492 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=23)
7492 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7293 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -20%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6352 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points -29%
Graphics
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21947 Points +14%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21737 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16194 - 26660, n=23)
21146 Points +10%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20288 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20093 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19247 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points -11%
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1960 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1783 Points -9%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1758 Points -10%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1728 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=23)
1699 Points -13%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1698 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points -27%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
81854 Points +462%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
81722 Points +461%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
80599 Points +453%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
74725 Points +413%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=21)
43831 Points +201%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +22%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14572 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10841 Points -26%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7448 Points +23%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6602 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1043 - 7865, n=11)
6385 Points +6%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6355 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6273 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6034 Points

Edge 30 Ultra的Adreno 730以非常高的性能给人留下深刻印象，在基准测试中与小米12S Ultra相当。但后来，摩托罗拉在屏幕测试中超过了小米，因为后者的QHD-Plus分辨率有更多像素需要处理。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2899 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points -7%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2456 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2038 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points -31%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2873 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2639 Points -6%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2073 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points -27%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11073 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10317 Points -6%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10151 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7932 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points -34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -17%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -37%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
445 fps -2%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
439 fps -4%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
303 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -34%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
267 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -25%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -25%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -42%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
247 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps -21%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps -23%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -30%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
147 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -15%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -40%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
189 fps +6%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps -29%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -37%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -45%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -11%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -35%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -45%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -56%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -5%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -34%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -36%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps -9%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -24%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -25%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -12%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -15%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -42%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -6%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -36%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -42%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -5%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps -27%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -43%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -9%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -35%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -39%

Basemark GPUScore

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø28.2 (11-165.1)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø46.1 (27.6-58.5)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø34.9 (11.5-146)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø41 (19.8-57.3)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official VRS; 1.0.0 : Ø29.9 (10.3-135.7)

在浏览器基准测试中，摩托罗拉的Edge 30 Ultra属于比较领域的中间位置。这些结果并不突出，但在日常使用中并不明显，这款智能手机以流畅的浏览速度令人信服。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)
125.2 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
124.37 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
117.894 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
108.34 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points -18%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
77.337 Points -34%
Vivo X80 Pro
72.786 Points -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18)
119.6 runs/min +21%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
112 runs/min +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min +9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
99.2 runs/min
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
87.9 runs/min -11%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
80.8 runs/min -19%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
65.5 runs/min -34%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
119 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=21)
113.9 Points +13%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
102 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
101 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
71 Points -30%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
161 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)
159.4 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
145 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
142 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points -14%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
101 Points -30%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
79 Points -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
46339 Points +25%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
44631 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)
42193 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
37098 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
36742 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points -8%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
27730 Points -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -38%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
1440.1 ms * -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * -14%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
1240.1 ms * -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
1104 ms *
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
1102.2 ms * -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)
1023 ms * +7%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
847.4 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Edge 30 Ultra中的UFS 3.1内存提供了非常高的传输速率，特别是在读写小块数据时。一些竞争对手在连续读取时速度更快，但这些差异在日常使用中是无法察觉的。

Motorola Edge 30 UltraSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GXiaomi 12S UltraSony Xperia 1 IVHonor Magic4 ProVivo X80 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
5%
-8%
-8%
-4%
-15%
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB
1717.77
1653
-4%
1963.45
14%
1982.56
15%
1868.5
9%
1856.39
8%
1742 ?(950 - 2037, n=102)
1%
1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
10%
Sequential Write 256KB
1363.58
1074
-21%
1475.43
8%
1262.21
-7%
1367.48
0%
1424.91
4%
1160 ?(452 - 2004, n=102)
-15%
1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
8%
Random Read 4KB
349.08
322.3
-8%
309.21
-11%
293.95
-16%
268.76
-23%
303.72
-13%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=102)
-18%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
446.25
273.1
-39%
489.58
10%
334.19
-25%
366.13
-18%
382.17
-14%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=103)
-29%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
-30%

游戏--可实现高细节和高帧率

ǞǞǞ Adreno 730是Android 领域中最强大的图形单元之一。因此，高要求的游戏对摩托罗拉的Edge 30 Ultra来说是没有问题的。

使用 GameBench工具检查了选定游戏的帧率。正如预期的那样，超高清设置可用于PUBG移动游戏，并且在40FPS下运行非常稳定。这在高清状态下甚至达到了60FPS，但进一步降低细节水平并没有带来任何帧率的提升。赛车游戏《Asphalt 9》也可以在最高的细节水平上流畅地渲染。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
沥青9：传奇
沥青9：传奇
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra; Asphalt 9: Legends; 3.6.3a: Ø60 (58-61)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.2.0: Ø59.8 (52-61)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.2.0: Ø40 (39-41)

排放--Moto Edge 30 Ultra中体面的双扬声器

温度

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra的表面温度始终很低，即使在持续负载的情况下，也只是在某些地方超过了32度的大关。

然而，智能手机的冷却系统无法使SoC的温度发展得到控制，因为这在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中只运行了四次就下降了，而且智能手机在测试过程中损失了高达40%的输出功率。但它仍然比使用相同芯片组的Zenfone 9略快。

Max. Load
 32 °C32 °C31 °C 
 32 °C32.3 °C31.2 °C 
 32.1 °C32.1 °C30.4 °C 
Maximum: 32.3 °C
Average: 31.7 °C
29.8 °C30.3 °C31 °C
29.6 °C30.3 °C31.9 °C
29.8 °C30.2 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 31.9 °C
Average: 30.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.1 % +14%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.3 % +10%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 % -2%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.7 % -10%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.8 % +20%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.3 % +16%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.1 %
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.6 % -1%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.5 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 % -2%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø13 (10.6-16.7)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø14.4 (13.4-20.1)
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø12.3 (8.84-16.7)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø44.1 (36.4-61.1)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø50.6 (47.5-59.3)
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø45.8 (33.4-62.9)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø55.3 (50.8-74)

发言人

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra的两个扬声器支持杜比全景声，但我们不会把音质描述为丰富。然而，在中等音量下，扬声器的工作做得相当好，提供了令人愉快的声音，但缺乏深度和动态，特别是在较高的音量下。

USB-C可用于有线耳机，这可能需要一个可选的适配器。通过蓝牙无线提供广泛的音频编解码支持（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+、LDAC、LHDC V1-4）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.633.82535.239.93132.645.6402941.95037.440.26330.6408029.340.910026.739.112524.338.716022.55120018.853.225016.256.33151262.54009.96350011.767.363010.370.180011.969.210001273125012.178.716001278.3200012.181.1250012.778.8315012.781400012.980.9500013.377.1630013.278.9800013.677.81000013.673.41250013.374.41600012.766.6SPL25.190.3N0.781.9median 12.7median 73.4Delta28.73533.93030.921.926.822.832.334.842.524.331.623.23327.831.514.733.720.950.221.250.717.55513.46114.164.113.167.511.571.413.175.511.780.511.879.21380.212.180.612.180.812.380.412.577.41378.113.272.71367.213.768.813.569.314.266.425.190.20.779.8median 13.1median 71.41.511.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 30 UltraSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 4,610毫安时的强大耐力

消耗功率

在测试中，功耗是不明显的，而且很节俭。在调整显示屏亮度的测试中，GFXBench的测试结果高于Zenfone 9，但华硕的智能手机也有一个小得多的面板。

Edge 30 Ultra的一个亮点是其125瓦的快速充电。在测试中，只用了24分钟就将电池充满，而在短短10分钟后就突破了50%的大关，20分钟后突破了85%的大关。摩托罗拉的智能手机也推动了无线充电的发展，它支持高达50瓦的无线充电。反向无线充电可以达到10瓦特。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.74 / 1.84 / 1.86 Watt
Load midlight 2.75 / 4.54 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 12S Ultra
4860 mAh		Sony Xperia 1 IV
5000 mAh		Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh		Vivo X80 Pro
4700 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-37%
-4%
-43%
-39%
-39%
-47%
-48%
Idle Minimum *
0.74
0.58
22%
0.9
-22%
1.06
-43%
0.87
-18%
0.92
-24%
1.006 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=21)
-36%
0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years)
-19%
Idle Average *
1.84
0.71
61%
1
46%
1.71
7%
2.04
-11%
2.04
-11%
1.834 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=21)
-0%
1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Maximum *
1.86
1.16
38%
1.2
35%
1.89
-2%
2.26
-22%
2.05
-10%
1.984 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=21)
-7%
1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years)
13%
Load Average *
2.75
7.07
-157%
3.5
-27%
4.99
-81%
4.97
-81%
4.29
-56%
5.68 ?(2.75 - 15, n=21)
-107%
6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years)
-138%
Load Maximum *
4.54
11.32
-149%
6.9
-52%
8.91
-96%
7.46
-64%
8.75
-93%
8.44 ?(4.54 - 15, n=21)
-86%
9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years)
-118%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø5.26 (0.911-12.7)
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.84 (0.1246-10.8)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.2 (10-12.2)
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.63 (8.51-8.94)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.09 (1.021-1.371)
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.973 (0.905-1.632)

电池寿命

较长的电池运行时间反映了功耗测量，因为摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra在比较领域的几乎所有领域都持续时间最长，尽管它的电池最小。只有在负载情况下，几个竞争对手才有更多的耐力，小米智能手机在实际的Wi-Fi测试中也持续时间更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 46min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 105)
14h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 48min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 23min
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 12S Ultra
4860 mAh		Sony Xperia 1 IV
5000 mAh		Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh		Vivo X80 Pro
4700 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
-4%
-40%
-14%
-15%
Reader / Idle
2206
1973
-11%
1766
-20%
979
-56%
1346
-39%
1728
-22%
H.264
1188
1078
-9%
1112
-6%
637
-46%
995
-16%
943
-21%
WiFi v1.3
872
844
-3%
951
9%
424
-51%
687
-21%
852
-2%
Load
323
410
27%
327
1%
297
-8%
389
20%
272
-16%

Pros

+ 高系统速度
+ 明亮的 144Hz POLED
+ 125/50 瓦的快速充电
+ 良好的相机设置
+ 电池运行时间长

Cons

- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- 没有内存扩展的选项
- 不防水

结论 - 摩托罗拉打出了自己的王牌

在审查中。摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra。评测样品由摩托罗拉德国提供。
在审查中。摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra。评测样品由摩托罗拉德国提供。

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra在测试中表现非常好，没有任何重大缺陷。它的脱颖而出要归功于明亮的显示屏、快速的SoC、较长的运行时间，以及带有20万像素主传感器的全功能三摄像头，甚至还带有光学放大功能。该包装以USB 3.2和快速充电技术为基础。

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra在硬件上的差距不大，但价格低于900美元。

明确的批评点包括：这里没有使用LTPO显示屏，而且只有在设置中永久激活相应选项时才能使用144赫兹。更高的IP认证当然也是可取的，而eSIM的支持在未来几年必然会成为必要。但这些都是对日常生活没有任何负面影响的妥协，特别是考虑到低于900美元的建议零售价是一个非常低的起始价格。

强大的替代品是 谷歌Pixel 6 Pro或 小米12 Pro.那些寻找紧凑型智能手机的人应该看一下 华硕Zenfone 9或 三星Galaxy S22.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

建议有兴趣的买家直接通过摩托罗拉的官方网站查询。首先，选择你的位置，并在搜索栏中输入Edge 30 Ultra。根据我们自己的搜索结果，该机型似乎在各大洲都有销售，范围从巴西(6.299,10雷亚尔),英国 (749.99英镑),法国 (899.00欧元),阿联酋(AED 3,999.00),印度(₹59,999) 到澳大利亚(暂时缺货)。

这份清单并不详尽。价格截止到2022年10月4日，可能会有变化。

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra - 09/30/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
68 / 70 → 96%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
66 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
91 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
77%
Average
84%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra评论。第一款拥有200MP摄像头的智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-10- 5 (Update: 2024-08-15)