Notebookcheck Logo

Tulpar T7 V20.6 (Tongfang GM7PG0R) 笔记本电脑评测:目前最便宜的 RTX 4060 玩家之一

土耳其郁金香绽放在柏林的亚历克斯大街上。

目前,Tulpar 笔记本电脑因其特别低廉的价格而备受关注。这家制造商并非来自中国,而是来自土耳其,并在柏林亚历山大广场开设了一家专卖店,邀请潜在买家前来试用。我们对这款 17 英寸 RTX 4060 游戏本 Tulpar T7 进行了分析,看看它是否能赶上主要制造商的机型,以及您是否有机会买到真正的游戏便宜货。
Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Raptor Lake

这家原本在土耳其经营的公司--严格来说,它的名称是 Monster Notebook--于 2022 年在欧洲市场更名为 Tulpar Notebook。Tulpar 的 DACH 总部位于柏林市中心的亚历山大广场,您可以在这里试用各种产品,并对设备进行维修--稍后再详述。

最近,人们对 Tulpar 的笔记本电脑越来越感兴趣,这意味着我们终于有机会测试第一台 Tulpar 笔记本电脑了。Tulpar 笔记本电脑分为 "A"、"T "和 "T "三个系列。而 T 系列则面向要求较高的频繁游戏玩家",制造商的网站如是说。虽然 "A 和 T 笔记本系列是根据最新技术标准设计的",但目前只有两个型号的 T6 配备了英特尔最新的 Gen14 CPU。我们的 T7 依然配备了 i7-13700H处理器。此外,还有 RTX 4060RTX 4060。

Tulpar 笔记本电脑目前的吸引力首先在于其低廉的价格。低价?在网站上,拥有 1 TB 存储空间的机型售价约为 1,800 美元!但与此同时,你也可以从某些在线零售商那里买到价格更低的 T7 笔记本电脑。

由于 18 英寸机型的兴起,今年推出的 17 英寸游戏本越来越少。因此,我们将把 T7 与去年的其他经济型中端游戏本进行比较,如 XMG Apex 17, 宏碁 Nitro 17, Medion Erazer 后卫 P40微星卡塔纳 17.此外,我们还将推出 16 英寸的 联想Legion 5i 16 G9与当前的 CPU 进行较量,看看最新技术能领先多少。

Tulpar T7 V20.6
Processor
Intel Core i7-13700H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 95 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 140 W TDP, Geforce 552.22, Optimus + MUX
Memory
16 GB 
, 1x 16 GB DDR4-3200
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN175C (CMN N173HCE-G33), IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, 512 GB 
, 480 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Microphone + Headphone, Card Reader: Full SD card reader
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30.05 x 395.7 x 263.6
Battery
62.32 Wh, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2-watt speakers, Keyboard: RGB single-zone backlit keyboard, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, lifetime free maintenance
Weight
2.585 kg, Power Supply: 687 g
Price
1699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.3 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Tulpar T7 V20.6
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg30.05 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.1 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg24.9 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3 kg30.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
84.6 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg33 mm17.30"2560x1440
82.1 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg25.2 mm17.30"1920x1080
89.1 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg25.2 mm16.00"2560x1600

案例 - 一个拥有绿色玩家之眼的同方人

图尔帕尔徽标
图尔帕尔徽标
正面结构
正面结构
软底盖可以压入
软底盖可以压入

同方的外壳完全由黑色塑料制成。正面的绿色徽标、下方带有蜂窝状图案的宽条以及键盘上方底座上带有绿色条纹的 Tulpar 品牌标识为该设备提供了点睛之笔。略带纹理的表面可吸附油脂和指纹痕迹。

在我们的扭转测试中,底座很容易弯曲,尤其是侧边会发出较强的破裂声。除此之外,底座足够稳定,显示屏也是如此。铰链很好地固定了显示屏,但在调整其打开角度时无法避免一定程度的晃动。后者约为 145 度。

我们只注意到底座与底板相接的前边缘有一些小缝隙,而且后者略有弯曲。底板由稍软的塑料制成,塑料很容易从外部压到内部散热元件(尤其是热管),特别是风栅,由于其缝隙更软。不过,由于有四个橡胶脚垫,这种情况一般不会发生。

总之,它的制造质量还不错,但市场上肯定有更稳定、质量更好的设备。

在比较范围内,T7 的尺寸和重量都比较平均。它的尺寸与 Medion 或 XMG 差不多,而 Nitro 和 Katana 则要大一些。其 2.6 千克的重量仅次于申克,而其他对比设备则更重,尤其是 Nitro,重约 3 千克。

T7 的最大厚度为 30 毫米,看起来并不十分纤薄,但宏碁 Nitro 的厚度与之相当,Medion 的(散热)肋骨甚至还要厚 3 毫米--尤其是 T7 在大多数地方都比规定的最大值要薄。Katana和XMG更薄。

尺寸比较

401 mm 299 mm 30.3 mm 3 kg397 mm 264 mm 33 mm 2.9 kg395.7 mm 263.6 mm 30.05 mm 2.6 kg398 mm 273 mm 25.2 mm 2.8 kg392.9 mm 260 mm 24.9 mm 2.5 kg359.7 mm 262.3 mm 25.2 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 无 Thunderbolt,但有 USB 2.0

Tulpar 玩家版配备了所有最必要的连接选项,其中最大的亮点是背面有专用的 MiniDP 端口,这对 VR 头显尤为重要。遗憾的是,它的 USB-C 端口不支持 Thunderbolt,而且三个 USB-A 端口(左侧)中有一个还是 2.0 型的。即便如此,它至少有一个全尺寸的 SD 读卡器和两个独立的音频接口。

它的布局还不错,至少两侧和背面的接口分布合理。最重要的是,LAN、HDMI、MiniDP 和电源等可能会很粗很硬的线缆都从背面排出,因此你只需在两侧处理 USB 设备。在右侧,两个 USB-A 端口之间的距离可以稍远一些,但除此之外,笔记本电脑的分布还是不错的。

左:Kensington、USB-A 2.0、麦克风、耳机/麦克风插孔
左:Kensington、USB-A 2.0、麦克风、耳机/麦克风插孔
右侧SD 读卡器,2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen 1
右侧SD 读卡器,2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen 1
背面MiniDP、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、HDMI 2.1、LAN、电源
背面MiniDP、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、HDMI 2.1、LAN、电源

SD 读卡器

慢速 SD 读卡器
慢速 SD 读卡器

我们喜欢这款笔记本配备的全尺寸 SD 读卡器。令人印象不深的是读卡器的速度太慢。读卡器没有闩锁装置,卡只能伸出一半。

我们测得的连续读写速度仅为 27 MB/秒左右,与我们的 AV PRO MicroSD 128 GB V60 参考卡的速度相比,简直不值一提。将 1 GB 的图片资料从卡上复制到桌面需要 48 秒!虽然Legion 5 和 XMG 的速度并不占优势,但竞争对手的速度要快得多。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s +285%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s +246%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
71.2 MB/s +187%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
35 MB/s +41%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
27.1 MB/s +9%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
24.83 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s +328%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
91 MB/s +227%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
81.1 MB/s +191%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
36 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
28.8 MB/s +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
27.86 MB/s

交流

可更换的 Wi-Fi 模块
可更换的 Wi-Fi 模块

该设备有一个 RJ45 局域网连接。在无线局域网方面,Tulpar 安装了英特尔 Wi-Fi 6 AX201 模块,该模块支持 Wi-Fi 6,但不支持 Wi-Fi 6E。

它的传输速率很高,发送和接收时非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1639 (1566min - 1713max) MBit/s +1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1615 (786min - 1654max) MBit/s
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1569 (1259min - 1667max) MBit/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1489 (1329min, 1338.28P1 - 1686max) MBit/s -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1445 (1373min - 1515max) MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (438 - 1715, n=71)
1287 MBit/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)
1235 MBit/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1043 (644min - 1347max) MBit/s -35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1734 (1706min - 1750max) MBit/s +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1687 (1644min - 1707max) MBit/s
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1675 (1509min - 1726max) MBit/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1636 (1424min - 1689max) MBit/s -3%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 - 1734, n=76)
1421 MBit/s -16%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1408 (1385min - 1443max) MBit/s -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1398 (1327min, 1333.09P1 - 1464max) MBit/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)
1383 MBit/s -18%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (786-1654)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1043 (644-1347)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1639 (1566-1713)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1373-1515)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1569 (1259-1667)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1489 (1329-1686)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1686 (1644-1707)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1636 (1424-1689)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1408 (1385-1443)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1706-1750)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1674 (1509-1726)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1398 (1327-1464)

网络摄像头

720p 网络摄像头
720p 网络摄像头

至少 XMG 和Legion 5 已经采用了全高清网络摄像头,而 Tulpar 和其他竞争对手一样,仍然采用 720p 摄像头。

该摄像头还必须面对色彩偏差较大和清晰度较差的问题,因此无法传输非常漂亮的用户图像。

ColorChecker
10.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
15 ∆E
10 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
16 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Tulpar T7 V20.6: 13.87 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 22.21 ∆E

安全

提供 Kensington 插槽,英特尔 CPU 中集成了 TPM。至少没有指纹传感器或网络摄像头盖等额外的安全功能。

配件和保修

这款价格实惠的 Tulpar 笔记本电脑没有额外的配件。不过,除了 12 个月的法定保修期外,Tulpar 还承诺每年提供终身免费维护。这包括清洁风扇、更换 CPU 和 GPU 的散热膏以及清除机箱内的灰尘。但要小心:如果客户自己做了任何事情(如更换散热膏),免费维护就会失效,因此最好阅读 Tulpar 网站上的确切条款和条件。

维护

机箱底部由 10 颗相同长度的十字螺丝和许多塑料夹子固定。因此,拉动时要小心,但总的来说还是很容易打开的。没有隐藏的螺丝。

在内部,你可以看到散热系统、两个内存插槽(只有一个被占用)、两个 M.2 固态硬盘插槽(一个空闲)、Wi-Fi 模块和电池。

打开
打开
2 个固态硬盘插槽,其中一个为免费插槽
2 个固态硬盘插槽,其中一个为免费插槽
覆盖 2 个内存插槽
覆盖 2 个内存插槽
仅占用 1 个内存插槽
仅占用 1 个内存插槽

输入设备 - 键盘比预期的更好

键盘

键盘采用标准布局;所有内容都分布在六行中,没有任何偏离设备顶部和底部的内容。右侧有一个数字键盘。三级背光(1 区)键盘的底部略微凹陷,按键尺寸为 1.5 x 1.5 厘米。与许多其他笔记本电脑相比,它们的按压路径稍长且较软,但反馈足够清晰。因此,键盘的平整度比其他同类产品要低,使用它打字既舒适又快捷。键入噪音为中等至中等响度,按键标示清晰易读。

键盘上方有一个独立的电源按钮,旁边还有一个按钮用于切换性能配置文件。遗憾的是,它们的名称与控制中心列出的名称不同,但它们控制的正是这些配置文件。办公平衡模式,游戏发烧模式,而 "涡轮增压 "实际上叫 "过度增压"。按钮上的一个小 LED 显示了正在使用的模式(关闭 =办公模式,橙色 =游戏模式,浅橙色 =涡轮增压模式)。

键盘
键盘
1 区背光,可选择颜色和图案
1 区背光,可选择颜色和图案
性能配置文件和电源按钮
性能配置文件和电源按钮
钥匙升降机
钥匙升降机

触摸板

触摸板
触摸板

尽管 Tulpar 是一款 17 英寸的笔记本电脑,但其触摸板(约 10.6 x 7.35 厘米)相对较小,这一点显而易见。由于采用了数字键盘,触摸板并不完全居中,而是略微偏左,这意味着它位于空格键的正下方。

只有在最佳状态下,数字键盘的表面才会光滑平整--换句话说,只要你的手稍有湿润,就会沾到数字键盘的表面。你可以双击左上方的触摸板来(取消)激活触摸板,一个小的 LED 灯会显示触摸板的当前状态。

触摸板的点击声音稍大,给人的感觉不是很高质,但还算可以。总的来说,触摸板的反应非常好,总体性能稳定。无论如何,游戏玩家还是会选择鼠标。

显示屏 - 2019 年的体面全高清显示屏

通过哑光叠加实现颗粒状子像素
通过哑光叠加实现颗粒状子像素
底部边角的背光渗出非常明显
底部边角的背光渗出非常明显

奇美的哑光全高清 IPS 显示屏是个老熟人了,它也出现在几款更便宜的微星 G 系列笔记本电脑中,包括 微星 GP75 豹 9SD(2019),以及我们之前测试过的 微星 GT76 9SG(2019)和 微星 GE75 9SG.当然,在这种情况下,机龄并不能真正代表质量。除了卡塔纳(Katana)之外,其他竞争对手都没有在 17 英寸采用全高清屏幕,而是采用 2560 x 1440 像素的高分辨率屏幕。

即便如此,该面板也不一定很差。它的平均亮度约为 350 尼特,还算不错,但照明还需要更均匀一些。反过来,由于黑色值较高,其对比度也高于同类设备,这对于一款经济型设备来说是不错的。背光出血现象几乎不明显,绝对不会影响使用。

不过,在亮度低于 25% 时,屏幕会以 25 kHz 至 42 kHz 的高频率闪烁,这意味着即使是敏感的用户也不会有任何问题。其响应时间约为 11 毫秒(黑到白)到 15 毫秒(灰到灰)。

367
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei CMN175C (CMN N173HCE-G33) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 380 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 352.6 cd/m² Minimum: 17.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 373 cd/m²
Contrast: 1639:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.83
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Chi Mei CMN175C (CMN N173HCE-G33), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
BOE0B7C NE173QHM-NY6, , 2560x1440, 17.3"
Medion Erazer Defender P40
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
B173HAN04.9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
4%
29%
5%
-36%
10%
Display P3 Coverage
64.2
68.1
6%
98.3
53%
68.3
6%
40.8
-36%
72.4
13%
sRGB Coverage
96.2
97.7
2%
100
4%
98.1
2%
61
-37%
100
4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.1
69.5
5%
85.7
30%
69.8
6%
42.2
-36%
74.1
12%
Response Times
19%
14%
12%
-129%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.7 ?(6.8, 7.9)
13.5 ?(6.4, 7.1)
8%
14.8 ?(7, 7.8)
-1%
14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5)
1%
33 ?(16, 17)
-124%
12.5 ?(6.1, 6.4)
15%
Response Time Black / White *
11.1 ?(5.7, 5.4)
7.9 ?(3, 4.9)
29%
8 ?(3.4, 4.6)
28%
8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1)
22%
26 ?(13, 13)
-134%
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
22%
PWM Frequency
25000
Screen
-55%
-153%
-32%
-222%
-9%
Brightness middle
377
403
7%
361
-4%
364
-3%
267
-29%
526
40%
Brightness
353
381
8%
326
-8%
343
-3%
256
-27%
500
42%
Brightness Distribution
83
90
8%
87
5%
86
4%
93
12%
87
5%
Black Level *
0.23
0.37
-61%
0.6
-161%
0.28
-22%
0.21
9%
0.33
-43%
Contrast
1639
1089
-34%
602
-63%
1300
-21%
1271
-22%
1594
-3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.83
2.22
-167%
3.83
-361%
1.67
-101%
4.7
-466%
1.2
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.92
3.76
-96%
5.71
-197%
2.78
-45%
20.4
-963%
2.1
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.83
1.22
-47%
3.48
-319%
1.14
-37%
4.5
-442%
1
-20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.9
1.9
-111%
3.29
-266%
1.4
-56%
1.5
-67%
1.3
-44%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.046 108%
2.29 96%
2.091 105%
2.12 104%
2.23 99%
CCT
6471 100%
6656 98%
6679 97%
6568 99%
6552 99%
6391 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-11% / -32%
-37% / -90%
-5% / -18%
-129% / -169%
7% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

在色彩空间覆盖率方面,这款略显过时的面板跟不上当前显示器的步伐。如果您希望获得比 sRGB 更大的色彩空间覆盖范围,那么您应该另寻他处。

sRGB
sRGB
显示 P3
显示 P3
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

这款面板开箱后的校准效果令人惊叹,尤其是在这个价位的产品中。其平均灰度和 ColorChecker DeltaE 值仅为 0.9 和 0.83(根据 sRGB 测量),因此用户无需进一步校准屏幕。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检查器
颜色检查器

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.7 ms rise
↘ 5.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 7.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25000 Hz
Amplitude: 27 %

The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8750 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

在室外,显示屏的哑光表面可以防止大部分反光。在阴暗处,直视 T7 也能很好地工作--其 350 尼特的亮度刚刚够用。只需避免阳光直射和倾斜视角即可。

直视屏幕时的外部情况
直视屏幕时的外部情况
倾斜视角
倾斜视角
IPS 显示屏的视角很好,显示屏的视角相当稳定(这是 IPS 显示屏的典型特点)。
IPS 显示屏的视角很好,显示屏的视角相当稳定(这是 IPS 显示屏的典型特点)。

性能 - 英特尔 13 代处理器并非旧闻

Tulpar T7 有多种配置可供选择,所有配置都配备了 RTX 4060.我们的 T7 20.6 配备了 Raptor Lake CPU i7-13700H而 T7 20.7 左右的型号仍然使用第 12 代 Alder Lake CPU,尽管名称中的 "数字 "可能更高。此外,内存和固态硬盘的配置也不尽相同,通常会在后面加上数字,例如 T7 20.6.1(1 TB 固态硬盘)与 T7 20.2(500 GB 固态硬盘)--两款机型都有 32 GB 内存。我们测试设备的内存和存储配置(16 GB 内存和 500 GB SSD)在 Tulpar 网站或对比门户网站上都找不到。

Tulpar T7 显然是针对预算有限的游戏玩家。它采用英特尔 Gen13 CPU 和 RTX 4060,承诺以低廉的价格提供良好的游戏性能。而 Tulpar T7 明显的玩家设计、厚重的外壳、小巧的触摸板和不太适合编辑的屏幕则无法直接满足创作者的需求。

 

测试条件

Tulpar 依靠的是一个通用的、略有改动的控制中心,其设计与申克和其他一些公司的 XMG 型号完全相同。它简单明了,提供各种设置选项。

性能选项卡提供了三种默认配置文件(平衡、发烧、超增压),以及带有各种自定义选项的手动模式。除非另有说明,我们使用超频模式进行了性能基准测试。

除性能配置文件外,还有 MUX 开关、常规设置、显示选项、键盘照明设置和电池设置。

说说电池模式:虽然笔记本电脑的性能当然会大大降低,但所设置的电源模式并不会发生直观的变化,因此,如果您之前激活了超增压模式并拔掉了电源插头,它在控制中心中仍然处于激活状态。这表明,当你离开插座时,也可以在各种电源模式之间进行选择。然而,情况很可能并非如此,因为无论选择哪种电源模式,我们的电池模式结果始终是相同的(在容差范围内)。

带有 Tulpar 品牌标识的通用控制中心
带有 Tulpar 品牌标识的通用控制中心
性能简介
性能简介
手动模式下的设置
手动模式下的设置
手动模式,高级设置
手动模式,高级设置

处理器

英特尔第 13 代 酷睿 i7-13700H这款游戏笔记本电脑采用了去年在各大厂商的许多游戏电脑中出现过的 CPU。最新的 Gen14 目前只有 Tulpar 的 T6 系列才有。不过,由于 Gen14 在速度上几乎没有任何优势,因此较新笔记本电脑的领先优势可能最多也只是很小。

超增压模式
超增压模式
发烧友模式
发烧友模式
平衡
平衡

在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中,我们的 Tulpar 表现出色,提供了较高的性能,最重要的是性能非常稳定,在最初几次运行后没有出现任何下降。在超频模式下,它的 TDP 为 95 至 96 瓦,相当稳定;在发烧模式下,它的 TDP 仍为 82 瓦;而在平衡模式下,我们注意到它的 TDP 只有 48 瓦。在电池模式下,它被自动设置为平衡模式。在此模式下,CPU 性能下降了约 27%。

总体而言,在所有基准测试中,T7 的性能与我们数据库中配备相同 CPU 的普通笔记本电脑基本持平。在许多测试中,T7 的速度甚至更快,但其 Geekbench 多线程得分异常低,使其总分略有下降。在 Cinebench 测试中,它比普通 i7-13700H 快约 11%。

这使它在性能方面处于对比设备的中间位置,只有Legion 5 明显更快,而所有其他竞争对手都与我们的测试设备相差几个百分点。

它在 Geekbench 测试中的多核得分异常低,这一点非常有趣。即使经过各种重复测试(超增压、dGPU 和混合模式测试),它的得分仍然很低。不过,在 Cinebench 测试中,它的多线程得分正常至良好。

性能简介/测量值 CB15 多重得分 TDP(单位:瓦)
涡轮 2,763 95
发烧级 2,538 82
平衡型 1,990 48
电池 1,760 35

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

019038057076095011401330152017101900209022802470266028503040323034203610Tooltip
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2730 (2699.97-2763)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2464 (2427.77-2483.7)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2728 (2664.71-2893.73)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2295 (2246.31-2349.07)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX: Ø3471 (3409.19-3799.39)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
86.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
78.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
70.7 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 -2!
Intel Core i7-13700HX
67.9 pt
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
66.6 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
 
65 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER -2!
Intel Core i7-13700H
62.2 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK -2!
Intel Core i7-13620H
61.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
24455 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=194, last 2 years)
21642 Points +18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20341 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
18843 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
18282 Points
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
15872 Points -13%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
15496 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (5890 - 20034, n=28)
15266 Points -16%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
1963 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
1904 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=192, last 2 years)
1878 Points -1%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
1805 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (1323 - 1914, n=28)
1797 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1777 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1668 Points -12%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
1549 Points -19%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
9349 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=192, last 2 years)
8236 Points +18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
7710 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
7041 Points +1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
6967 Points
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6208 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (2322 - 7674, n=28)
5945 Points -15%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
5905 Points -15%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
754 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
731 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=192, last 2 years)
722 Points -1%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
693 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (508 - 741, n=28)
693 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
690 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
644 Points -12%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
594 Points -19%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
3799 (3409.19min - 3799.39max) Points +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=199, last 2 years)
3392 Points +23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3189 Points +15%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
2894 (2664.71min - 2893.73max) Points +5%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
2763 (2699.97min - 2763max) Points
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2484 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (905 - 2982, n=28)
2455 Points -11%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
2349 (2246.31min - 2349.07max) Points -15%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
287 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
278 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=196, last 2 years)
276 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
274 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (213 - 278, n=28)
260 Points -6%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
258 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
243 Points -13%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
223 Points -20%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (169 - 555, n=28)
229 Seconds * -32%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
215 Seconds * -24%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
199 Seconds * -14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
198 Seconds * -14%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
182 Seconds * -5%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
174 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=187, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
141 Seconds * +19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
93686 MIPS +77%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=191, last 2 years)
84613 MIPS +60%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
72220 MIPS +37%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
71260 MIPS +35%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
71102 MIPS +34%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
62324 MIPS +18%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (27322 - 76344, n=28)
61025 MIPS +15%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
52867 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6697 MIPS +10%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
6695 MIPS +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=191, last 2 years)
6280 MIPS +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
6090 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (4825 - 6238, n=28)
5858 MIPS -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
5742 MIPS -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5552 MIPS -9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
4933 MIPS -19%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
16010 Points +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years)
14171 Points +68%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13128 Points +56%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (8415 - 13832, n=12)
11887 Points +41%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
8415 Points
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
2761 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2706 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years)
2641 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
2564 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (2316 - 2639, n=12)
2551 Points -1%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
16810 Points +89%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=192, last 2 years)
14892 Points +68%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14222 Points +60%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
13090 Points +47%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
12077 Points +36%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (6165 - 14215, n=28)
11777 Points +33%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
11289 Points +27%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
8888 Points
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1941 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
1933 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=192, last 2 years)
1882 Points +5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
1793 Points 0%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
1793 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (1362 - 1919, n=28)
1792 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1666 Points -7%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
1527 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
25.6 fps +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=191, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20.8 fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
20.4 fps +13%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
19.9 fps +11%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
18 fps
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
17.1 fps -5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (6.72 - 21.2, n=28)
16.7 fps -7%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
56.8 s * -3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
55.8 s * -1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
55 s *
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
49.8 s * +9%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (31.3 - 62.4, n=28)
48.2 s * +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=188, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
47.2 s * +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
43.8 s * +20%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.536 sec * -21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.493 sec * -11%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28)
0.4651 sec * -5%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4442 sec *
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H
0.4438 sec * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=192, last 2 years)
0.4401 sec * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4288 sec * +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
0.4195 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2763 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
218 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
278 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
731 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6967 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18282 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1904 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
111 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
818 Points
Help
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
90.9 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.3 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
80.1 pt
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
70.3 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
 
65.9 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
25579 KRay/s +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=188, last 2 years)
21618 KRay/s +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
19044 KRay/s +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
18335 KRay/s +5%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
17448 KRay/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
15397 KRay/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (4986 - 18908, n=28)
14011 KRay/s -20%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
13601 KRay/s -22%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
112272 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=188, last 2 years)
105988 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95271 Points +8%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
88382 Points
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
88187 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77807 Points -12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (25360 - 92359, n=28)
70414 Points -20%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67187 Points -24%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=188, last 2 years)
4848 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4344 MB/s +11%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4224 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4214 MB/s +8%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3920 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3412 MB/s -13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (1339 - 4224, n=28)
3272 MB/s -17%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2773 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=188, last 2 years)
116174 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
115013 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
113837 Points +7%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
106470 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
101500 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
99940 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (68763 - 107159, n=28)
98096 Points -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
78352 Points -26%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
14789 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=188, last 2 years)
13167 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
11913 Points +9%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10888 Points
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10416 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10407 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (4800 - 11050, n=28)
8871 Points -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
8421 Points -23%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58960 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=188, last 2 years)
53413 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
47097 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
44093 Points +2%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43349 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
38311 Points -12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (12321 - 45118, n=28)
34551 Points -20%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
32787 Points -24%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
166498 MB/s +104%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
151254 MB/s +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=188, last 2 years)
109484 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86485 MB/s +6%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81519 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (28769 - 151254, n=28)
76444 MB/s -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
72510 MB/s -11%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58525 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=188, last 2 years)
1348 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1289 MB/s +10%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1215 MB/s +4%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1167 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1040 MB/s -11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
981 MB/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (389 - 1215, n=28)
945 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
818 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
13631 KRay/s +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=188, last 2 years)
11643 KRay/s +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10316 KRay/s +10%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9441 KRay/s 0%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9400 KRay/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
8145 KRay/s -13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (2540 - 10135, n=28)
7510 KRay/s -20%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
7364 KRay/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (12872 - 52727, n=28)
40281 MPixel/s +213%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=189, last 2 years)
39933 MPixel/s +210%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
37987 MPixel/s +195%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36121 MPixel/s +181%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36118 MPixel/s +181%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
34544 MPixel/s +168%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
33763 MPixel/s +162%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
12872 MPixel/s

系统性能

在系统性能方面,T7 位居中上游。在 PCMark 10 中,它完全达到了这种硬件组合的平均水平。它的 CrossMark 成绩略低。

至少在我们的 T7 配置中,只占用一个内存插槽并不是最好的结果。下面的 AIDA 内存测试显示了单通道内存的劣势。如果要使用双通道,则必须再插入一根内存条,因为还有一个插槽是空闲的。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7854 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=169, last 2 years)
7771 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7645 Points +2%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
7463 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7157 - 7661, n=5)
7452 Points 0%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7160 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7157 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
6909 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
11188 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=168, last 2 years)
10833 Points -3%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10809 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10804 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (10179 - 11200, n=5)
10775 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10714 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10179 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10069 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=168, last 2 years)
9878 Points +1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
9784 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (8238 - 10249, n=5)
9406 Points -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9308 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9241 Points -6%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8238 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12190 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12144 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=168, last 2 years)
12018 Points +17%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11862 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (10308 - 11862, n=5)
11121 Points +8%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
10308 Points
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9903 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9393 Points -9%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2092 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=152, last 2 years)
1900 Points +10%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1857 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1802 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1774 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1722 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1629 - 1849, n=5)
1715 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1629 Points -5%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1938 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=152, last 2 years)
1802 Points +6%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1765 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1744 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1694 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1643 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1561 - 1743, n=5)
1639 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1561 Points -8%
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2336 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=152, last 2 years)
2084 Points +13%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2013 Points +9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1992 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1908 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1691 - 2064, n=5)
1873 Points +2%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1841 Points
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1691 Points -8%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1889 Points +28%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1734 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=152, last 2 years)
1700 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1675 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1656 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1577 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1381 - 1656, n=5)
1515 Points +2%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1480 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
311 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=166, last 2 years)
303 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
302 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
294 Points
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
292 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
285 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (215 - 314, n=4)
282 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
215 Points -27%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
283 Points +4%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
273 Points
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
270 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=154, last 2 years)
266 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (228 - 274, n=4)
262 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
247 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
232 Points -15%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
228 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
570 ms * -14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
538 ms * -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
516 ms * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
516 ms * -3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (495 - 570, n=4)
516 ms * -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 779, n=180, last 2 years)
506 ms * -1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
499 ms *
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
486 ms * +3%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7463 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69205 MB/s +184%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=188, last 2 years)
64901 MB/s +167%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (24334 - 78081, n=28)
62480 MB/s +157%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
59727 MB/s +145%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57552 MB/s +137%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57466 MB/s +136%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
53391 MB/s +119%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
24334 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71455 MB/s +202%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=188, last 2 years)
68661 MB/s +190%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67639 MB/s +186%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (23681 - 79656, n=28)
65892 MB/s +178%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65092 MB/s +175%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
61655 MB/s +160%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
61613 MB/s +160%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
23681 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
87147 MB/s +279%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (22986 - 99898, n=28)
68690 MB/s +199%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=188, last 2 years)
66722 MB/s +190%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
64704 MB/s +181%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57744 MB/s +151%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
51138 MB/s +122%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
50700 MB/s +121%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
22986 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
136.8 ns * -55%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
101.7 ns * -15%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H
  (82.4 - 136.8, n=28)
94.1 ns * -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=188, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93 ns * -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
89.8 ns * -2%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
88.3 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86.2 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

遗憾的是,在移动 LatencyMon 软件的窗口时,我们已经发现了第一个延迟问题。打开浏览器会进一步增加延迟值,而随后打开多个标签页则不会。至此,我们测得的 500 μs 左右的延迟值仍在可承受范围内。

但是,在播放 4K/60fps YouTube 视频时,延迟值上升到了 5,000 μs 以上!不过,没有出现掉帧现象。不过,这个值显然还是太高了。

YouTube 测试
YouTube 测试
LatencyMon main
LatencyMon main
LatencyMon 驱动程序列表
LatencyMon 驱动程序列表
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
5235.4 μs *
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4343.1 μs * +17%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2396.6 μs * +54%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2024.9 μs * +61%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1444 μs * +72%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
331.4 μs * +94%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

安装的三星 NVMe 固态硬盘只有 500 GB 的存储容量,有些老旧,因此速度不是特别快,这也是因为它在 T7 内的性能略逊一筹。竞争对手在这方面显然更快。您一定要选择 1 TB 存储空间的 T7 配置。不过,也不必担心,因为它的速度足以满足日常工作和游戏的需要,而且在 Crystaldiskmark 测试中的表现也略胜一筹。毕竟,它的性能在较长时间内保持不变。

Crystaldiskmark 6
Crystaldiskmark 6
AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
AS SSD 复制
AS SSD 复制
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3620 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2494 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 466 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 405 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 139.6 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 420 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 884 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
92.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
84.3 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER -1!
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.4 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
71.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.1 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
58.1 pt
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
 
46.5 pt
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
45.1 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4182 (4112.68min - 4181.96max) MB/s +54%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3670 (3344.35min - 3669.81max) MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3600 (3591.11min - 3600.32max) MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=169, last 2 years)
3500 MB/s +29%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2709 (2683.01min - 2708.68max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (2440 - 2800, n=11)
2629 MB/s -3%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2578 (2552.79min - 2578.03max) MB/s -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2501 (2479.67min - 2500.68max) MB/s -8%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5691 (5642.64min - 5691.25max) MB/s +189%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4675 (4517.46min - 4675.27max) MB/s +137%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4284 (3292.65min - 4283.85max) MB/s +118%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4064 (3527.07min - 4064.49max) MB/s +106%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=169, last 2 years)
3819 MB/s +94%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3115 (2904.62min - 3115.38max) MB/s +58%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (1768 - 2472, n=11)
2077 MB/s +5%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1969 (1899.81min - 1968.6max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7138 (6097.05min - 7137.85max) MB/s +97%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6651 (5971.64min - 6651.33max) MB/s +83%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=169, last 2 years)
6365 MB/s +75%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5276 (4023.18min - 5275.6max) MB/s +45%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
5009 (4674.55min - 5008.89max) MB/s +38%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4719 (4052.12min - 4719.01max) MB/s +30%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3632 (2817.13min - 3632.27max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (3549 - 3632, n=11)
3597 MB/s -1%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6879 (6862.3min - 6878.53max) MB/s +174%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5114 (4838.31min - 5113.74max) MB/s +103%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4952 (4919.08min - 4952.42max) MB/s +97%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=169, last 2 years)
4855 MB/s +93%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4797 (4359.23min - 4796.61max) MB/s +91%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3629 MB/s +44%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2515 (2501.27min - 2514.9max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (2236 - 2526, n=11)
2416 MB/s -4%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.9 (83.66min - 83.86max) MB/s +4%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
80.7 (78.37min - 80.66max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (58.4 - 80.8, n=11)
73.3 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
73.1 (71.21min - 73.06max) MB/s -9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
70.6 (68.54min - 70.62max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=169, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
51.1 (49.74min - 51.1max) MB/s -37%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
37.7 (37.23min - 37.65max) MB/s -53%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
286 (269.48min - 285.84max) MB/s +90%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
281 (267.52min - 281.12max) MB/s +87%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
267 (207.8min - 267max) MB/s +78%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
246 (236.18min - 245.56max) MB/s +64%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
234 (230.63min - 233.8max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=169, last 2 years)
222 MB/s +48%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (106.8 - 237, n=11)
161.4 MB/s +7%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
150.3 (145.16min - 150.31max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4919 MB/s +396%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4010 (4002.81min - 4009.85max) MB/s +304%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3726 (3679.51min - 3726.29max) MB/s +276%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3335 (3324.73min - 3334.83max) MB/s +236%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2769 MB/s +179%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=169, last 2 years)
2553 MB/s +157%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (813 - 1837, n=11)
1318 MB/s +33%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
992 (963.91min - 992.31max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4683 (4539.15min - 4683.17max) MB/s +934%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3737 (3683.15min - 3737.15max) MB/s +725%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3355 (3245.87min - 3354.61max) MB/s +641%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2646 (2422.02min - 2645.88max) MB/s +484%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2635 (2459.5min - 2634.95max) MB/s +482%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=169, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s +364%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (361 - 1919, n=11)
1068 MB/s +136%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
453 (440.18min - 452.9max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9906 Points +190%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8677 Points +154%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8345 Points +144%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
7599 Points +122%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=160, last 2 years)
6742 Points +97%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6311 Points +85%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (2512 - 5210, n=11)
3964 Points +16%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3417 Points
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3562 Points +195%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3277 Points +172%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3242 Points +169%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2625 Points +118%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2446 Points +103%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=160, last 2 years)
2445 Points +103%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (1129 - 2027, n=11)
1530 Points +27%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1206 Points
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4529 Points +177%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3846 Points +135%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3618 Points +121%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3417 Points +109%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=160, last 2 years)
3113 Points +90%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2658 Points +62%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (742 - 2182, n=11)
1691 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1637 Points
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5581.75 MB/s +97%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5413 MB/s +91%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=160, last 2 years)
4976 MB/s +76%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4853 MB/s +71%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3920 MB/s +38%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3667.76 MB/s +30%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (2560 - 3189, n=11)
2971 MB/s +5%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2832 MB/s
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5609.38 MB/s +271%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4373 MB/s +190%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3979 MB/s +164%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3884.67 MB/s +157%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=160, last 2 years)
3750 MB/s +148%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3007 MB/s +99%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (1361 - 2260, n=11)
1871 MB/s +24%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1510 MB/s
4K Read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.2 MB/s +11%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.43 MB/s +1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
72.9 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
66.66 MB/s -9%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (51.5 - 78.1, n=11)
65.9 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=160, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s -11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
63.89 MB/s -12%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
58.8 MB/s -19%
4K Write
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
249 MB/s +35%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
234.6 MB/s +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=160, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
207.32 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
199.81 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
194.6 MB/s +6%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
184.3 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (98.6 - 228, n=11)
160.9 MB/s -13%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2936.98 MB/s +246%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2718 MB/s +220%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2619 MB/s +208%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2194.79 MB/s +158%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1995 MB/s +135%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=160, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s +121%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (783 - 1641, n=11)
1167 MB/s +37%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
850 MB/s
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3768.03 MB/s +189%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3253 MB/s +150%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3021.8 MB/s +132%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2745 MB/s +111%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=160, last 2 years)
2529 MB/s +94%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2108 MB/s +62%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (431 - 1797, n=11)
1343 MB/s +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1302 MB/s
Access Time Read
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.094 ms * -15%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.082 ms *
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
0.08 ms * +2%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (0.033 - 0.128, n=11)
0.07664 ms * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=159, last 2 years)
0.05489 ms * +33%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.032 ms * +61%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * +74%
Access Time Write
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.096 ms * -220%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=160, last 2 years)
0.04827 ms * -61%
Average Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
  (0.03 - 0.097, n=11)
0.03873 ms * -29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
0.033 ms * -10%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.03 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.02 ms * +33%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * +33%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.019 ms * +37%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3613 (3063.27-3637.51)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7125 (6521.13-7140.99)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4543 (2707.25-4716.49)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4118 (3284.7-6662.02)

图形卡

所有 T7 机型均配备 Nvidia Geforce RTX 4060.Tulpar 没有提供有关其性能的任何信息,但 Nvidia 控制面板显示其功率为 140 瓦。RTX 4060 应能以中高细节全高清运行几乎所有当前的游戏,这与所安装的显示器是兼容的。

在合成 3DMark 测试中,它的 3D 性能非常出色,比配备相同 GPU 的普通笔记本电脑高出约 10%。

在电池模式下反复运行Fire Strike ,3D 性能下降了约 85%,下降幅度很大!显然,只有集成图形处理器在起作用。如果停用 Optimus(只激活 dGPU),它的得分就会大幅提高,性能损失也会降到 56%左右。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
95.1 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
87.8 pt
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
87.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
87.4 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
86.8 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
84.6 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
83.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
80.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=187, last 2 years)
43524 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
37410 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
37294 Points +1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
36993 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
36470 Points -1%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
36323 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
35731 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28136 - 38912, n=54)
34842 Points -6%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
177440 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
169707 Points +1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
167679 Points
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
158354 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
157190 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (81407 - 180228, n=27)
148916 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points -15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=197, last 2 years)
31252 Points +11%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
28189 Points
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
27681 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
27474 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
27417 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
27122 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
25896 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (20533 - 29656, n=51)
25737 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=192, last 2 years)
13032 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
11267 Points +7%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
10529 Points
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
10500 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
10347 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
10329 Points -2%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
10299 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7484 - 11451, n=53)
9945 Points -6%
3DMark 11 Performance
28054 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
60984 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
24884 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10324 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
25 Seconds * -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
25 Seconds * -9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
23 Seconds * -0%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (19 - 28, n=50)
23 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
22 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
21 Seconds * +9%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
44 Seconds * -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
44 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (39 - 53, n=50)
43.2 Seconds * -3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
42 Seconds * -0%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
42 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
41 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
41 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.7 Seconds * +13%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
353 Seconds * -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
345 Seconds * -15%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
324 Seconds * -8%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
320 Seconds * -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (189 - 452, n=50)
309 Seconds * -3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
301 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=192, last 2 years)
297 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
247 Seconds * +18%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

遗憾的是,Tulpar 笔记本电脑在游戏对比中未能保持 3DMark 的良好成绩,因为它经常输给竞争对手,最终排名垫底。XMG 与之水平相当,但许多竞争对手都比它快 10%。

在运行当前的游戏《骷髅战士》时,T7 在全高清和超高细节的情况下仍能达到平均 65fps 的可玩性。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
94.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93.1 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86.9 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
85.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
80.5 pt
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
78.3 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
126.8 fps +27%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
105 fps +5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
104.7 (88min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103.4 (91min) fps +4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103 (89min) fps +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
99.6 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
97.2 (93min, 94P1) fps -2%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
120.2 (4.33min, 76.9P1) fps +23%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
114.1 (4.15min, 66.7P1) fps +17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
113.9 (5.92min, 76.9P1) fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=172, last 2 years)
113.1 fps +16%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
112.1 (8min, 62.5P1) fps +15%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
97.8 (3.96min, 66.7P1) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=185, last 2 years)
119 fps +28%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
106.3 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103.4 fps +11%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103.3 fps +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
100.8 fps +8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
96.1 fps +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93.3 fps
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=183, last 2 years)
227 fps +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
210 fps +6%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
198.7 (61.6min, 145.2P1) fps
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
195.2 (34.4min, 140.1P1) fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
190.1 (115.3min, 138.9P1) fps -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
188.3 (28min, 137.1P1) fps -5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
185.1 (15.5min, 136.7P1) fps -7%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
168.7 (146.8min) fps +47%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
156.3 (132.3min) fps +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=191, last 2 years)
149.4 fps +30%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
144.3 (117.7min) fps +25%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
139.8 (124.1min) fps +22%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
135.7 (113.9min) fps +18%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
115 (93.6min) fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
130.9 fps +32%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
118.9 fps +20%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
111.7 fps +12%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
109.3 fps +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=197, last 2 years)
107.2 fps +8%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
99.32 fps
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
88.2 fps -11%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
147 fps +43%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
142 (115min) fps +38%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
134 (109min) fps +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +27%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
130 (100min) fps +26%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
128 (100min) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (95 - 148, n=33)
122.3 fps +19%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
155 fps +42%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
151 (127min) fps +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 232, n=100, last 2 years)
139.4 fps +28%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
139 (111min) fps +28%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
136 (109min) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (104 - 158, n=32)
129.8 fps +19%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
109 fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
161 fps +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (38 - 248, n=86, last 2 years)
145.6 fps +29%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
145 (116min) fps +28%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
142 (108min) fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (110 - 165, n=29)
135.7 fps +20%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
113 fps

Witcher 3图表遵循通常的昼夜曲线,除此之外,其性能非常稳定。T7 的速度虽不及某些竞争对手,但差距也不算太大。

其 GPU 时钟频率稳定在 2.6 GHz 左右,内存时钟频率为 2.1 GHz。GPU 的发热温度为 72 °C,最高温度为 75.5 °C。显卡的功耗约为 97 瓦,与 140 瓦的可能功耗还有一定差距。

发烧友模式下,其时钟频率下降了 100 至 150 MHz,但温度变化情况类似。功耗约为 94 瓦。

GPU 时钟
GPU 时钟
GPU 温度
GPU 温度
GPU 功耗
GPU 功耗
性能模式/测量值 Witcher 3 fps GPU 时钟(单位 GHz) GPU 温度(单位 °C) GPU 功耗(单位瓦特)
超频 97 2.6 73 97
发烧级 90 2.45 72 94
平衡型 64 1.7 57 49

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø91.4 (85-97)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø100.1 (92-103)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø103.9 (98-107)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø100.7 (96-104)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø92.2 (89-98)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø97.2 (93-102)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 178.3 172.1 163 97.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 339 287 198 99.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 148 130 124 115
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 149.5 125.8 93.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 141.69 126.82 99.32
Far Cry 5 (2018) 135 113 109 103
Strange Brigade (2018) 432 291 230 198.7
Skull & Bones (2024) 82 82 78 65

排放--适度值

噪音排放

在台式机上空转时,笔记本电脑的风扇通常是关闭的。这同样适用于超速模式,但在使用超速模式时,风扇有时会短暂转速高达 40 分贝。在空闲模式下执行要求不高的任务时,后者也能实现。

在 3DMark06 测试中,风扇噪音缓慢增加到 40 分贝。不过,在测试过程中,风扇的噪音又变小了,最后,风扇的噪音稳定在 38 分贝。因此,我们测得的 40 分贝应理解为风扇在平均负载下的最大值。

Witcher 3 期间,风扇 转速一直在 47.5 分贝到略低于 50 分贝之间。这些都是游戏玩家的典型值,但本次测试中的竞争对手在游戏时的噪音甚至更大。总的来说,T7 在噪音方面的表现相当不错,但还达不到其他对比设备的性能。

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 23 / 30.84 dB(A)
Load
40.14 / 50.69 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.938.228.9252930.6293129.834.629.84026.930.226.95030.528.230.56324.718.624.78023.92023.910024.32024.312524162416026.122.826.120029.315.929.325031.911.131.931532.610.732.640036.59.836.550038.58.638.563037.27.537.2800388.238100039.4839.4125041.28.341.2160040.98.940.92000419.541250040.210.540.2315037.810.537.8400038.21138.2500033.911.233.9630028.211.228.2800024.411.224.41000021.811.321.81250017.611.417.61600014.710.414.7SPL50.322.550.3N6.90.46.9median 33.9median 10.7median 33.9Delta7.41.57.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseTulpar T7 V20.6
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
-6%
-3%
-16%
-14%
-9%
off / environment *
23
24
-4%
24
-4%
25
-9%
24.5
-7%
24
-4%
Idle Minimum *
23
25
-9%
24
-4%
26
-13%
24.5
-7%
24
-4%
Idle Average *
23
29
-26%
24
-4%
27
-17%
24.5
-7%
28.8
-25%
Idle Maximum *
30.84
33
-7%
32.32
-5%
32
-4%
40
-30%
32
-4%
Load Average *
40.14
37
8%
35.18
12%
53
-32%
48.3
-20%
45.5
-13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50.69
50
1%
54.78
-8%
56
-10%
56
-10%
53.1
-5%
Load Maximum *
50.69
54
-7%
54.78
-8%
64
-26%
59.1
-17%
55.7
-10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

T7 的表面温度也保持适中,其热点在压力测试期间仅升温至 44 °C。

平衡模式下进行同样的压力测试时,我们测得的平均表面温度仅为顶部 32 °C,底部 33 °C。

Max. Load
 38 °C36 °C35 °C 
 38 °C34 °C32 °C 
 27 °C28 °C27 °C 
Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 32.8 °C
38 °C44 °C40 °C
28 °C44 °C31 °C
24 °C25 °C25 °C
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  52 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
压力测试顶部
压力测试顶部
电源压力测试
电源压力测试
压力测试底部
压力测试底部
Witcher 3 顶级
Witcher 3 顶级
Witcher 3 电源
Witcher 3 电源
Witcher 3 底层
Witcher 3 底层
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat
-16%
-11%
2%
-4%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
38
51
-34%
46
-21%
42
-11%
41.6
-9%
40.4
-6%
Maximum Bottom *
44
54
-23%
51
-16%
45
-2%
43.1
2%
43.8
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
32
33
-3%
34
-6%
28
12%
32
-0%
30.3
5%
Idle Bottom *
33
34
-3%
33
-0%
30
9%
35.8
-8%
35.3
-7%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在压力测试中,开始时核心频率约为 3.5 - 3.7 GHz,并在一小时测试结束前一直保持在这个范围内。其核心温度平均为 78 °C,没有超过 85 °C。CPU 的功耗在 60 至 80 瓦之间波动,平均为 67 瓦。

CPU 时钟
CPU 时钟
CPU 温度
CPU 温度
CPU 功耗
CPU 功耗
CPU 时钟 (GHz) GPU 时钟 (MHz) CPU 平均温度 (°C) GPU 平均温度(°C)
系统空闲 4.2 / 41 /
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 3.5 1,264 80 54
Witcher 3 压力 0.64 2,600 77 71

发言人

非常小的扬声器
非常小的扬声器

立体声扬声器位于笔记本电脑的前角,体积很小,向下辐射。因此,扬声器的音量还可以再大一些,但缺少低音。至少中高音是平衡的。

麦克风输入和耳机输出均为 3.5 毫米,用于连接模拟音频设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.938.229.92527.530.627.53132.334.632.34026.830.226.85027.428.227.46323.518.623.58018.22018.210022202212531.61631.616039.722.839.720048.415.948.425053.411.153.431555.410.755.440060.19.860.150062.88.662.863068.37.568.380070.38.270.3100069.6869.6125066.38.366.3160064.78.964.7200071.49.571.4250067.910.567.9315065.910.565.9400060.81160.8500061.611.261.6630062.511.262.5800067.811.267.81000064.611.364.6125006211.4621600059.310.459.3SPL78.922.578.9N44.10.444.1median 62.5median 10.7median 62.5Delta7.31.57.338.342.129.43425.330.530.732.22929.729.630.524.82923.73422.337.119.537.418.646.820.750.817.25814.461.311.664.69.969.79.973.79.772.39.875.11075.810.372.410.870.611.269.211.668.911.671.41273.21272.712.172.611.975.411.4672484.40.560.4median 11.6median 69.737.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTulpar T7 V20.6Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 去年的效率

耗电量

T7 并不特别节俭。当笔记本处于闲置状态时,已经有更省钱的竞争对手了--尽管差距并不太大。当运行 Witcher 3 时,它的耗电量过高 尤其是考虑到它的性能略低。虽然 Medion 和 Lenovo 的耗电量稍高,但 XMG 和 Acer 在性能略胜一筹的同时也更加节俭。

如果通过 HDMI 连接外接显示器,笔记本电脑的 dGPU 将处于激活状态,例如,其空闲功耗将增加约 5 瓦(见下图)。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 12 / 17 / 17.5 Watt
Load midlight 78.5 / 209 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Tulpar T7 V20.6
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, , 2560x1440, 17.3"
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
16%
9%
-2%
3%
-21%
-7%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
12
9
25%
8.3
31%
8
33%
12.2
-2%
15.4
-28%
11.8 ?(3 - 33, n=45)
2%
Idle Average *
17
12
29%
13.5
21%
12
29%
14.9
12%
19.7
-16%
16.3 ?(6.9 - 35, n=45)
4%
Idle Maximum *
17.5
14
20%
14.8
15%
18
-3%
15.8
10%
20.7
-18%
20.8 ?(7.6 - 45, n=45)
-19%
Load Average *
78.5
67
15%
77
2%
101
-29%
85.22
-9%
102.6
-31%
94 ?(59 - 190, n=44)
-20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
169
147.6
13%
154
9%
180.8
-7%
151.1
11%
191.3
-13%
Load Maximum *
209
223
-7%
263
-26%
284
-36%
212.8
-2%
246.6
-18%
213 ?(99 - 364, n=45)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø168.9 (158.75-209.09)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø147.6 (139.5-156.9)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø154.4 (142.88-198.5)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø127.9 (105.86-145.6)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø208 (183.2-211)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø198.8 (159.5-262.62)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.6 (10.994-20.269)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.2 (8.88-13.8)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.5 (11.109-19.496)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø111.7 (108.13-114.55)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø79.7 (78.8-94.3)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø147 (145.06-160.26)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø144.1 (93.75-151.82)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø79.9 (78.4-92.7)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø173.9 (162.18-193.38)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø151 (146.1-164.8)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø162.8 (149.44-174.32)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø151.5 (144-167.5)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.4 (14.834-27.292)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø14.9 (13.2-20.2)

运行时间

Tulpar 在 17 英寸的机箱中安装了一块 62 瓦时的电池。虽然 XMG Apex 配备了同样的电池,微星 Katana 甚至只能使用 54 瓦时的电池,但就笔记本电脑的尺寸而言,这对游戏玩家来说并不算大。而其他三家竞争对手则配备了更大的电池,功率在 73 到 90 Wh 之间。

因此,在降低亮度至 150 尼特的情况下,T7 在无线局域网测试和视频测试中的运行时间达到了约 3.5 小时。只有卡塔娜(Katana)在这方面表现较差,而其他对比设备的续航时间要长得多,例如 Apex,尽管它配备了同样大小的电池。这也许是因为它采取了更好的节能措施。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
3h 29min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
2h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 30min
Tulpar T7 V20.6
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 62.32 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 (Late 23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 62.32 Wh
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
45%
111%
38%
-26%
74%
53%
H.264
222
411
85%
413
86%
339
53%
576
159%
WiFi v1.3
209
306
46%
494
136%
373
78%
176
-16%
444
112%
Load
90
93
3%
76
-16%
58
-36%
46
-49%
Reader / Idle
469
528
Witcher 3 ultra
151

Pros

+ MiniDP、SD 读卡器(可惜速度很慢)
+ 快速、稳定的 6 速 Wi-Fi
+ 终身、每年免费维修
+ 坚固的键盘
+ 相对凉爽

Cons

- 无 Thunderbolt 接口,1x USB 2.0
- 弱 720p 网络摄像头
- 单通道内存
- 游戏性能略低于平均水平
- 电池续航时间短

结论 - 经济实惠,性能稳定,但核心竞争力不强!

Tulpar T7 20.6,由以下公司提供
Tulpar T7 20.6,由以下公司提供

除了目前极具吸引力的价格外,我们还特别喜欢 Tulpar T7 的键盘、快速无线局域网,当然还有终身、每年一次的免费维修。此外,T7 在压力下也能保持相当低的温度。

不过,后者也有其代价,因为这款经济实惠的游戏机在玩游戏时并没有充分利用其功率。当然,你可以原谅廉价游戏笔记本电脑的网络摄像头不给力或不支持 Thunderbolt。但反过来,它也应该在游戏这一核心领域有所作为。而 Tulpar 笔记本电脑根本做不到这一点。制造商给我们提供的配置是 16GB 单通道内存,尽管还有 32GB 的各种型号(希望是双通道?因此,T7 在游戏方面落后于竞争对手--当然这是不应该的。它的电池续航时间也可能会让一些用户失望,尽管这对 17 英寸游戏玩家来说可能并不太重要。

Tulpar T7 是一款经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑,并提供终身、每年一次的免费维修服务。您只需确保选择配备双通道内存的配置,否则其性能将无法与竞争对手匹敌。

如果只考虑它的 MRSP,那么有很多替代品。不过,配备 RTX 4060 的 T7 目前的价格特别低,在某些情况下还不到 1000 美元。如果您准备花更多钱,那么 联想Legion 5在许多方面,联想可能是更好的选择。

价格和供应情况

目前,Tulpar T7 还未在美国上市。显然,该制造商将于今年晚些时候在美国推出其产品。

Tulpar T7 V20.6 - 05/24/2024 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
71 / 98 → 72%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
67%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 84%
Weight
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Battery
54 / 95 → 57%
Display
91%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
90 / 95 → 94%
Noise
83 / 90 → 92%
Audio
75%
Camera
36 / 85 → 42%
Average
75%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Tulpar T7 V20.6 (Tongfang GM7PG0R) 笔记本电脑评测:目前最便宜的 RTX 4060 玩家之一
Christian Hintze, 2024-05-25 (Update: 2024-05-25)