联想V17 G2评论。17英寸笔记本电脑的MX350并不令人满意
联想V17 G2是一款适合小预算的17英寸办公笔记本电脑。然而,这一次,我们得到了我们的手与Nvidia的顶级模型 GeForce MX350,一个英特尔 酷睿i7-1165G7,16GB内存,和一个512GB的固态硬盘供我们测试。该套件由一个300尼特的FHD IPS显示屏完成。不提供AMD选项。
另一方面,以979欧元(约合1001美元)的价格,这个配置更适合那些有中高预算的人。我们的测试将发现,Nvidia GPU和Core i7的额外溢价是否值得,或者竞争对手是否提供了更好的替代品。V17也可以以699欧元(约715美元)的价格购买,配备Core i5,没有Nvidia GPU,内存和固态硬盘相同。
竞争对手包括价格低廉的HP 17 ,配备AMD Ryzen 5500U ,以及Acer Aspire 5 A517 ,CPU和GPU配置与我们的测试机相同。考虑到这个价格,办公中端产品,如联想的IdeaPad 5 Pro 16 和HPs Envy 17 也在可承受范围内。此外,我们将其与的前身 及其较小的基于AMD的兄弟姐妹,即联想V15 。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350 | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
80 % v7 (old) | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
80 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP Envy 17-cg i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450 | 2.7 kg | 19.3 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
82.7 % v7 (old) | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350 | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
86.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
78.6 % v7 (old) | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 2.5 kg | 24.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
76.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 2.2 kg | 21.4 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例和设备。V17的USB-C无电源传输
联想V17由塑料制成,没有像V15那样使用任何热塑料,而且表面也明显更光滑。指纹是不可避免的。铁灰色与它的简单设计相匹配。由于采用16:9格式,显示屏边框在底部更宽。
底部装置可以在使用一些力量的情况下被扭曲,而且在来自顶部的有针对性的压力下,它也会屈服。键盘台面可以略微下压,但这并不成为打字时的一个烦恼。铰链能够很好地固定显示器,但这也意味着你不能用一只手打开它。
在机箱内,我们发现在一个锡盖下面有一个RAM模块。英特尔的AX201(WiFi 6+蓝牙5.1)也可以更换,就像PCIe 3.0固态硬盘一样。此外,你可以对电池、冷却系统和BIOS电池进行维护工作。
在连接方面,其中一个USB-A端口移到了另一侧,另一个USB-A端口被替换为USB-C端口,不过遗憾的是,该端口只支持数据传输。 此外,其中一个USB端口只支持USB 2.0。与V15相比,缺少RJ45,但仍有(缓慢的)SD读卡器(SD卡伸出了~16毫米,~0.6英寸)。还包括HDMI 1.4b和一个3.5毫米的音频端口。虽然2.16公斤(约4.8磅)对于17英寸的笔记本电脑来说是相当轻的,但在我们的比较领域的16英寸设备明显更紧凑。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH (AV PRO V60) | |
HP Envy 17-cg (AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH (AV PRO V60) | |
HP Envy 17-cg (AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Office (713 - 1961, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (745 - 1252, n=3) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average of class Office (1065 - 1790, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1670, n=3) | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE |
联想V17的输入设备:为经常打字的人提供清晰的键盘
联想在V17中还包括一个良好的、防溅的键盘。键盘提供了一个短的行程,清晰的压力点,以及适量的阻力。虽然你可以用它来快速输入文本,但它不一定会很安静。大多数按键都有全尺寸,但有几个比较小,有些只能作为共享键的辅助功能。 没有键盘照明。
虽然本来有空间可以容纳更大的触摸板,但这并不改变其光滑的塑料表面的良好和准确的反应行为,它还提供了良好的滑动特性。集成的点击键提供了强烈的反馈和短到中等的行程。
联想的FHD IPS显示屏反应非常灵敏
哑光IPS显示屏提供1920 x 1080像素(16:9)的分辨率,这对于17.3英寸的尺寸来说是足够的,因为屏幕和观看者之间的距离比较小的显示屏大多了。Windows的缩放设置为100%,这提供了最清晰的显示效果。 清晰流畅的子像素有助于实现清晰的图像。
1600 x 900的TN面板,这是V15的唯一选择,也是V17的另一个选择,在这里绝对应该避免使用。308尼特的平均亮度对于办公任务和室内的简单游戏来说是足够的。在71%的情况下,亮度分布是不均匀的,但这对日常工作来说不是一个障碍。
849:1的对比度和0.39尼特的黑值很平庸,在我们的测试领域排在最后。在120赫兹的16:10格式的QHD分辨率下,联想的IdeaPad Pro 5提供了这个价格段中最好的面板。
sRGB色彩空间覆盖率达到87%,但这对于要求较高的图像处理来说是不够的,大多数竞争对手都要好一些。响应时间出奇的好(黑到白14毫秒),而且没有PWM闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 71 %
Center on Battery: 325 cd/m²
Contrast: 849:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63.86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.36% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.52% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE BOE NV173FHM-N4K, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE BOE CQ NT156FHM-N43, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Envy 17-cg AU Optronics AUO439D, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP 17-ca1149ng Chi Mei CMN175E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 BOE084E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -38% | 11% | 6% | -4% | -36% | 7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.52 | 38.8 -43% | 71 5% | 68 1% | 61.4 -9% | 39.98 -41% | 66.6 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 87.36 | 58.4 -33% | 99 13% | 95 9% | 86.6 -1% | 59.3 -32% | 99.5 14% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.86 | 40.09 -37% | 73.3 15% | 69 8% | 62 -3% | 41.3 -35% | 68.5 7% |
Response Times | -37% | 31% | -98% | -84% | 40% | -44% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22 ? | 38 ? -73% | 16.4 ? 25% | 40 ? -82% | 40 ? -82% | 14 ? 36% | 32 ? -45% |
Response Time Black / White * | 14 ? | 14 ? -0% | 8.8 ? 37% | 30 ? -114% | 26 ? -86% | 8 ? 43% | 20 ? -43% |
PWM Frequency | 66 ? | 24940 ? | 250 ? | 2500 ? | |||
Screen | -39% | 34% | 24% | 21% | 17% | 47% | |
Brightness middle | 331 | 235 -29% | 395 19% | 347 5% | 327 -1% | 321 -3% | 304 -8% |
Brightness | 308 | 231 -25% | 375 22% | 329 7% | 287 -7% | 282 -8% | 284 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 71 | 84 18% | 90 27% | 89 25% | 80 13% | 81 14% | 88 24% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.25 36% | 0.32 18% | 0.27 31% | 0.25 36% | 0.36 8% | 0.165 58% |
Contrast | 849 | 940 11% | 1234 45% | 1285 51% | 1308 54% | 892 5% | 1842 117% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.89 | 10.59 -80% | 2.6 56% | 3.75 36% | 4.03 32% | 4.3 27% | 1.44 76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.94 | 22.08 -122% | 5.4 46% | 7.53 24% | 7.35 26% | 7.1 29% | 3.62 64% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.69 | 12.5 -120% | 3.4 40% | 4.88 14% | 4.84 15% | 2.26 60% | 2.6 54% |
Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.43 91% | 2.12 104% | 2.53 87% | 2.39 92% | 2.36 93% | 2.41 91% |
CCT | 7952 82% | 16404 40% | 6140 106% | 6624 98% | 6850 95% | 6650 98% | 6527 100% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.41 | 1.1 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 38 | 68.5 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 59 | 99.5 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -38% /
-38% | 25% /
28% | -23% /
1% | -22% /
-1% | 7% /
8% | 3% /
24% |
* ... smaller is better
DeltaE值>5显示出相对较高的偏差,大多数的颜色和灰度都是如此。此外,显示器有轻微的蓝色色调。像往常一样,我们校准过的ICC色彩配置文件可以在亮度分布示意图旁边免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
联想V17的平均亮度为308尼特,显示表面为哑光,因此也可以在户外有限地使用。阴凉处没有问题,你也可以在部分阴凉处工作,但应避免阳光直射。
性能。英特尔Tiger Lake ,通常比AMD Ryzen快。
我们的测试设备代表了联想提供的最大配置:英特尔 酷睿i7-1165G7,16GB DDR4-3200内存(8GB焊接+8GB插槽),一个512GB PCIe 3.0固态硬盘,以及一个Nvidia GeForce MX350除了集成的英特尔 Iris Xe G7.
另外,你也可以选择一个 奔腾金7505, 酷睿i3-1115G4(均为双核), 或 酷睿i5-1135G7.还有一个可选的内存配置,4GB焊接+8GB插槽,Nvidia显卡也是可选的。
测试条件
联想的Vantage软件提供了三种性能模式,这对功率限制有影响,同时也对(恒定)性能有影响。在最有效的模式下,风扇的速度会比较慢。
最高性能: PL2(短暂涡轮)为48瓦,PL1为35瓦。
智能冷却。我 们测量35瓦特PL2和15瓦特PL1。
我们选择最高性能模式进行性能测试,并使用平衡配置文件来确定电池寿命。
处理器
英特尔 酷睿i7-1165G7有4倍2.8至4倍4.1GHz的时钟速度,以及高达4.7GHz的单核。TDP规定在12至28瓦之间,简短的Turbo则为64瓦。
然而,在用Blender渲染时,我们观察到恒定的33瓦特(PL1)和短暂的Turbo高达48瓦特(PL2)。这导致在Turbo模式下的时钟速度为3.9GHz,所有四个核心的时钟速度恒定为3.4GHz,这比2.8GHz的基本时钟速度高。温度水平在72℃(162°F)左右。
在多核情况下,如Blender,在x265渲染或CBR23 Multi基准测试期间,AMD Ryzen 5 5500U能够比Core i7-1165G7领先约15-20%。在单核任务中,在网上冲浪和压缩数据时,联想V17领先AMD六核约20至25%。联想的 IdeaPad 5 Pro 16其45瓦的AMD APU再次占据主导地位,比运行在33瓦的英特尔Tiger Lake 芯片的性能高出一倍。然而,酷睿i7的性能仍足以满足办公和多媒体任务。
在电池运行期间,恒定的性能并没有下降。然而,由于涡轮增压此时更加犹豫不决,在第一次CBR15运行时的性能下降了约7%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU | v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom CUDA
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core | OpenCL Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10: CPU | GPU
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH -3! | |
Average of class Office | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 -3! | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 -3! | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg -3! | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE -7! | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W -6! | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE -3! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64) | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 () | |
Average of class Office (343 - 3964, n=93, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 () | |
Average of class Office (155 - 675, n=5, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / OpenCL Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (11261 - 78194, n=78) | |
Average of class Office (3627 - 46692, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 / CPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (1329 - 15618, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1195 - 7436, n=72) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 / GPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (8 - 88, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (7 - 360, n=72) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (196 - 314, n=74) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 () |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (591 - 795, n=79) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3933 - 8184, n=58) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (17720 - 34369, n=58) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (958 - 2338, n=58) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (44161 - 50624, n=58) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3183 - 4796, n=58) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (11876 - 20468, n=58) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (29506 - 73387, n=58) | |
Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (169 - 402, n=65) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2033 - 4461, n=58) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (12392 - 45694, n=58) | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH |
系统性能
该系统运行迅速,没有任何延迟。在PCMark 10基准测试中,采用英特尔酷睿i3的前辈可以超过约46%。另一方面,在我们的比较领域的竞争对手表现出类似的水平。然而, IdeaPad 5 Pro 16在内容创作方面比联想V17快约44%。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (4855 - 5306, n=5) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (8026 - 9551, n=5) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (8343 - 9071, n=5) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (4373 - 5330, n=5) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 () | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 () | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 () | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 () | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE |
PCMark 10 Score | 5004 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (20032 - 65446, n=58) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (23033 - 64524, n=58) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21736 - 66791, n=58) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (69 - 110, n=65) | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
联想V17不适合实时应用,因为DPC的延迟太高。对此负责的是内核模块驱动程序。在未来,BIOS的更新可能会带来一些改善。4K60 YouTube视频再现平均使用了约29%的Core i7性能和34%的Intel iGPU性能。没有出现掉帧的情况。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
联合内存(UMIS)AM620是一款PCIe 3.0固态硬盘,提供512GB。它的读写速率很稳定,甚至与三星PM991的读写速率几乎相同。HP Envy 17.
你可以在配备较小的38瓦时电池的机型中增加一个2.5英寸硬盘,比如说 联想V15 G2.
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Lenovo UMIS AM620 RPJTJ512MEE1OWX | Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G | HP Envy 17-cg GeForce MX450, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 13% | 7% | 25% | 5% | 18% | |
Seq Read | 1816 | 2135 18% | 1961 8% | 2217 22% | 2643 46% | 2015 11% |
Seq Write | 889 | 1748 97% | 954 7% | 1920 116% | 1510 70% | 1055 19% |
4K Read | 53 | 41.3 -22% | 48.32 -9% | 31.52 -41% | 42.86 -19% | 73.9 39% |
4K Write | 154 | 131.7 -14% | 131.4 -15% | 215.3 40% | 85.5 -44% | 223.2 45% |
4K-64 Read | 698 | 992 42% | 1021 46% | 301.4 -57% | 768 10% | 589 -16% |
4K-64 Write | 759 | 1457 92% | 883 16% | 1395 84% | 1983 161% | 1029 36% |
Access Time Read * | 0.05 | 0.156 -212% | 0.072 -44% | 0.052 -4% | 0.103 -106% | 0.056 -12% |
Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 0.047 -68% | 0.029 -4% | 0.035 -25% | 0.101 -261% | 0.039 -39% |
Score Read | 933 | 1247 34% | 1266 36% | 555 -41% | 1075 15% | 865 -7% |
Score Write | 1001 | 1764 76% | 1110 11% | 1802 80% | 2220 122% | 1358 36% |
Score Total | 2381 | 3635 53% | 2982 25% | 2635 11% | 3797 59% | 2644 11% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1028 | 1574 53% | 1662 62% | 1186 15% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 400 | 464.3 16% | 641 60% | 782 96% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 929 | 1087 17% | 1266 36% | 1028 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Office | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average Lenovo UMIS AM620 RPJTJ512MEE1OWX |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
联想V17 G2的纯游戏性能与 NvidiaGeForce MX350是去年配备英特尔iGPU的型号的两倍。我们还看到,每秒的帧数比在 联想V15 G2的每秒帧数多出约60%。Vega 7 iGPU.另一方面,在 IdeaPad 5 Pro 16再次翻倍,这要归功于其明显更强大的 GTX 1650.
因此,我们问自己,MX350是否有很大意义,因为英特尔的 Iris Xe G7对于简单的游戏来说不一定更强大。这一点从以下方面可以看出 宏碁的Swift 3表明了这一点,它甚至超过了我们的MX350大约20%。为了进一步检查这一点,我们停用了Nvidia GPU并在高细节设置下测试了TheWitcher 3 。当我们这样做时,我们看到20 FPS,而MX350能够达到27.5 FPS--相差约37%。无论如何,这两个版本都无法显示高细节水平。
此外,我们检查了一小时后图形性能是否保持不变,没有看到帧率有任何下降。在电池运行中,性能没有降低。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH -1! | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 -1! | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W -1! | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (5191 - 6540, n=13) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (23194 - 26239, n=9) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (1089 - 9375, n=93, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (3999 - 4656, n=14) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (313 - 4109, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (1123 - 1595, n=12) | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6781 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18419 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4196 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1524 points | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (35.2 - 51.9, n=13) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
HP Envy 17-cg | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 59.1, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (20.6 - 29.9, n=13) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W |
Strange Brigade | |
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (13.4 - 77.2, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (31.7 - 35, n=3) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE | |
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (10.8 - 64.5, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (24.6 - 27.2, n=3) | |
Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE | |
Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE |
Ghostwire Tokyo - 1920x1080 Low Settings | |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 () | |
Average of class Office (last 2 years) |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 156 | 137.3 | 49.5 | 22.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 85.3 | 51.9 | 27.5 | 17.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 119.4 | 114.9 | 88.4 | 80.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 49.2 | 23.9 | 15.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 90.8 | 72.3 | 63.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 64 | 29 | 23 | 20 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 94.4 | 35 | 27.2 | 20.1 |
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 18.1 | 16.7 | 14.8 | 13.6 |
联想V17的排放仍在限制范围内,但电池寿命受到影响
噪声排放
在安装应用程序或用几个浏览器标签上网时,联想V17的风扇喜欢不时地打开,但其速度仍然相当缓慢。在负载增加的情况下,例如在游戏时,声音会变大,我们测量到46分贝(A)。其他具有类似dGPU的设备在我们的比较领域中表现更差。
虽然宏碁的Swift 3更加安静,最大为39 db(A)。IdeaPad 5 Pro具有更强大的dGPU,声音更大,为53 db(A)。我们没有注意到任何电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.4 / 25.4 / 28.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32 / 46 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) |
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Lenovo UMIS AM620 RPJTJ512MEE1OWX | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD | Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G | HP Envy 17-cg GeForce MX450, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 6% | -13% | -4% | -3% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 25.4 | 25.5 -0% | 25 2% | 26 -2% | 24.9 2% | 24.04 5% | 26 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.4 | 25.5 -0% | 25 2% | 26 -2% | 24.9 2% | 24.04 5% | 26 -2% |
Idle Average * | 25.4 | 29 -14% | 25 2% | 31.7 -25% | 24.9 2% | 24.04 5% | 26 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.1 | 29 -3% | 25 11% | 27 4% | 24.04 14% | 27.7 1% | |
Load Average * | 32 | 30.1 6% | 33.6 -5% | 43.2 -35% | 44.1 -38% | 41.3 -29% | 32.7 -2% |
Load Maximum * | 46 | 33.4 27% | 34.5 25% | 46.6 -1% | 44.8 3% | 52.93 -15% | 39 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.21 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在满负荷的情况下,键盘上方有一些热点,但办公用笔记本电脑从未出现令人不舒服的高温。风扇将热量吹向后面,所以你应该不会被任何恼人的热空气击中。
在长达一小时的压力测试(FurMark + Prime95)中,CPU时钟速度开始时为3.4GHz,但仅一分钟后就降至2.85GHz,然后在第四分钟趋于平缓,达到最终值1.1GHz。在这一点上,功率限制1从33瓦减少到15瓦,Nvidia GPU被优先使用。它以恒定的1,433 MHz(基本时钟速度)运行,在大机箱中加热到只有63℃(145°F)。
在这种情况下,CPU的温度高达62°C(144°F)。在纯粹的CPU压力下,它消耗恒定的~34瓦,加热到71℃(160°F)。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | HP Envy 17-cg Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | 14% | 23% | 5% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 40.4 19% | 45.9 8% | 35 30% | 51.9 -4% | 40 20% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.3 | 41.1 17% | 49.7 -1% | 40 19% | 51.5 -4% | 47 5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 34.6 -8% | 24.2 24% | 25.6 20% | 27.2 15% | 30.1 6% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.1 | 40 -21% | 24.8 25% | 25.3 24% | 28.5 14% | 31.6 5% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个1.5瓦的杜比音频扬声器指向底部,达到70.5分贝(A)的中等音量。虽然它们几乎缺乏任何低音,但中音和高音非常平衡,适合于清晰的语音再现。即使是游戏的声音也不会太差。
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Envy 17-cg audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
在空闲运行时,功耗升高,在游戏时,联想V17的功耗为54瓦,以满足Nvidia/Intel的组合。电源足够大,有65瓦。虽然在压力测试中,系统的消耗量略高于65瓦,但这样的情况在实践中应该不会出现。
Off / Standby | 0.17 / 0.55 Watt |
Idle | 6.9 / 20.6 / 23.9 Watt |
Load |
53.4 / 68 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
在我们的WiFi测试中,45瓦时的电池在150尼特亮度下只能持续6小时。由于采用了AMD APU 2,拥有38瓦时电池的较小的兄弟姐妹可以持续2小时,而竞争对手也可以持续更长时间。在超过12小时的情况下,IdeaPad 5 Pro持续时间的两倍。联想的电池可以在大约1小时内从0充电到80%。
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 45 Wh | Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 42 Wh | Lenovo V15 G2 ALC-82KD003XGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, 38 Wh | HP Envy 17-cg i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450, 55.67 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 50.2 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 75 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | 22% | 68% | 77% | 92% | 71% | 87% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 366 | 369 1% | 479 31% | 472 29% | 441.4 21% | 754 106% | 585 60% | 612 ? 67% |
Load | 57 | 64 12% | 118 107% | 133 133% | 101 77% | 103 81% | 117.8 ? 107% | |
Reader / Idle | 944 | 1063 | 827 | 1205 | 1300 ? | |||
H.264 | 371 | 292 | 623 | 615 | 728 ? | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 77 | 130 | 142 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论:Nvidia MX350和Core i7是不必要的,而且价格昂贵。
联想的V17 G2能够满足对办公笔记本电脑的几乎所有要求:308尼特的FHD IPS显示屏,良好的输入设备,良好的性能,保持在极限范围内的排放,良好的稳定性,以及良好的升级选项,如内存插槽和插槽式快速WLAN模块。
一个主要的抱怨点是设备:没有充电或通过USB-C的DisplayPort,没有RJ45,缓慢的SD读卡器和USB-2.0不是我们在购买约1000欧元(约1022美元)的办公设备时想要的。另外一个缺点是电池寿命低,只有6小时,这是由于其高耗电造成的。
然而,抱怨的最大原因是 GeForce MX350因为它与集成的英特尔Iris Xe G7相比并没有真正带来多少好处。 Iris Xe G7而在价格上增加了溢价。特别是与酷睿i7处理器结合在一起,同样与酷睿i5相比,几乎没有带来任何好处,这使得联想V17的价格不必要地昂贵。
如果没有GeForce
显卡和酷睿i7,联想V17 G2 ITL是一款价格合理的可靠办公笔记本电脑。但是,这些升级使它变得不必要的昂贵,而没有在性能上提供任何真正的好处。
那些能够掏出979欧元(约合1001美元)购买我们测试的顶级配置的人应该选择更高级别的设备,如IdeaPad 5 Pro 16 。这不仅使电池寿命和所有的性能值增加了一倍,而且还提供了迄今为止我们所有对比设备中最好的显示屏,同时价格还比Ryzen 5600H高100欧元(采用Ryzen 5600H),或者也要花费约1000欧元(约1022美元)的八核。
然而,那些想要一个更实惠的笔记本电脑的人应该看看联想V17,其配置没有Nvidia GPU,配备Core i5,价格为699欧元(约715美元)。另外,我们还可以推荐HP 17 ,因为它提供了AMDRyzen 5 500U ,并且已经以549欧元(约561美元)的价格出售--现在它在德国的Notebooksbilliger.de甚至只需要449欧元(约459美元)。
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE
- 07/21/2022 v7 (old)
Marvin Gollor