申克 Vision 16 2023 评论：16 英寸轻便型，端口众多

Name: SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Brand: SCHENKER

轻量级超极本

全新的申克 Vision 16 高端超极本采用轻质镁合金机身，配备最新的英特尔 CPU 和 240 Hz 的 WQHD 雾面屏幕。与申克公司的一贯做法一样，它具有很强的可升级性。

Philip Macdonald, 👁 Benjamin Herzig (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/06/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Raptor Lake Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Ultrabook Windows

除了 Vision 16 Pro之外，申克还推出了 Vision 16。这款特别轻巧的 16 英寸超极本采用了最新的英特尔猛禽湖芯片酷睿 i7-13700H。专用图形处理器为 Pro 机型保留。去年 Vision 16 的重量为 1.45 千克，而新机型的重量为 1.5 千克，仍然是市场上最轻的 16 英寸笔记本电脑之一。

新款 Vision 16 没有采用去年的 90 Hz 屏幕，而是采用了 Pro 版的 240 Hz WQXGA 面板。尽管对冷却系统进行了重新设计，以降低 Vision 16 在负载情况下的噪音，但它仍然使用液态金属来传递酷睿 i7-13700H 的热量。

Vision 16 的售价为 1.539 欧元起。这款基本机型配备 16GB DDR5-4800 内存和 500GB 三星 M.2 固态硬盘。我们的评测机型配备了 32 GB 内存和 1 TB M.2 三星 990 Pro 固态硬盘。采用 Windows 系统的评测版本售价约为 1,660 欧元。

Test device courtesy of Schenker

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1

Processor

Intel Core i7-13700H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 45 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual channel, 2x SO-DIMM, max. 64 GB

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 , IPS, 99% sRGB, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Raptor Lake-P PCH

Storage

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, PCIe 4.0 NVME M.2 SSD, 7.450 MB/s read, 6.900 MB/s write, 870 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Audio, Card Reader: SDXC

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.1 x 353.7 x 245.3

Battery

80 Wh, 0 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 0 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 120 Watt PSU, Control Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.504 kg, Power Supply: 503 g

Price

1660.99 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.5 kg	17.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
91.8 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU	1.5 kg	11.5 mm	15.30"	2880x1864
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.6 kg	19 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
85 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	990 g	10.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.6 kg	14.7 mm	15.00"	2496x1664
83.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	1.9 kg	18.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

机箱 - 1.5 千克镁合金笔记本电脑

机身与 Vision 16 Pro 完全相同，与前代机型基本保持一致。我们评测的是银色版本，而我们评测的 Vision 16 Pro 是黑色版本。银色版本更加突出，让我们想起了 MacBook Pro 16由于超大的触控板，银色版更显眼，让人联想到 MacBook Pro 16。镁合金机身（底座和屏幕盖）重量仅为 1.5 千克。只有键盘中央有轻微的松动，其他部分都很坚固。铰链不是很牢固，允许屏幕有一定的晃动。

尺寸比较

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4、全尺寸 SD 读卡器和多个 USB 端口

端口也与 Vision 16 Pro 相同。由于端口选择得当，这款超极本无需使用加密狗或适配器。与 MacBook Air 相比，Vision 16 基本上拥有大多数人需要的所有端口。左侧有一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔和一个全尺寸 SD 卡插槽。两个 USB A 3.2 Gen 1 端口使鼠标或键盘无需使用加密狗。同样实用的还有 HDMI 端口，不过这只是 HDMI 2.0b，而不是 HDMI 2.1。左侧的 Thunderbolt 4 端口和右侧的 USB C 端口完善了连接选项。由于有专用的专有充电端口，充电时其他端口都不会被占用。唯一缺少的是以太网插孔。

SD 读卡器

申克 Vision 16 配备了 SD 读卡器，但速度相当慢，我们使用参考卡（Angelbird AV Ori V60）测得的写入速度为 22.7 MB/s，读取速度为 27.7 MB/s。对于重度用户来说，外置读卡器可能是更好的选择。对于休闲使用，读卡器就足够了。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	158 (154.8^min - 166.31^max) MB/s +596%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	153.8 MB/s +578%
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years)	58.1 MB/s +156%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H (AV Pro V60)	22.7 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	18.4 MB/s -19%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	182 MB/s +557%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	180.68 MB/s +552%
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years)	73.1 MB/s +164%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H (AV Pro V60)	27.7 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	25.8 MB/s -7%

交流

Vision 16 中的 AX201 WiFi 6 模块在接收数据时效果很好，但在发送数据时却显示出弱点。不过，体验可能会有所不同，因为几乎相同的申克 Vision 16 Pro 中的相同 WLAN 模块能提供更好的效果。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1649 (1563^min - 1672^max) MBit/s +124%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1630 (1571^min - 1660^max) MBit/s +121%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1551 (796^min - 1646^max) MBit/s +110%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1459 (796^min - 1577^max) MBit/s +98%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (438 - 1715, n=71)	1287 MBit/s +75%
Average of class Office (47.8 - 1793, n=89, last 2 years)	1130 MBit/s +53%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	920 (862^min, 866.35^P1 - 953^max) MBit/s +25%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	737 (596^min - 848^max) MBit/s
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W MediaTek MT7921	720 (674^min - 765^max) MBit/s -2%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1687 (1665^min - 1702^max) MBit/s +11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1623 (1587^min - 1654^max) MBit/s +7%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1580 (1553^min - 1600^max) MBit/s +4%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1553 (1528^min - 1565^max) MBit/s +3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1515 (818^min - 1680^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1734, n=76)	1421 MBit/s -6%
Average of class Office (104.2 - 1775, n=89, last 2 years)	1271 MBit/s -16%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	858 (810^min, 818.41^P1 - 880^max) MBit/s -43%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W MediaTek MT7921	709 (702^min - 714^max) MBit/s -53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1583 (1034^min - 1700^max) MBit/s
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1580 (1112^min - 1710^max) MBit/s
Average of class Office (713 - 1961, n=49, last 2 years)	1407 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (745 - 1252, n=3)	993 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1551 (1516^min - 1567^max) MBit/s
Average of class Office (1065 - 1790, n=49, last 2 years)	1544 MBit/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1337 (676^min - 1552^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1670, n=3)	993 MBit/s

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1583 (1034-1700)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1337 (676-1552)

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø737 (596-848)

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø920 (862-953)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1433 (796-1577)

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1514 (818-1680)

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø858 (810-880)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1552 (1528-1565)

网络摄像头

申克 Vision 16 的 FHD 网络摄像头可以拍摄出合格的照片。只要光线条件不差，它足以满足视频会议的要求。由于集成了红外传感器，200 万像素的网络摄像头可以通过 Windows Hello 进行生物识别登录。

ColorChecker SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1: 11.25 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 21.12 ∆E

维护

申克 Vision 16 的底盖共用九颗螺丝固定。正面的四颗螺丝和背面中间的螺丝比其他螺丝短。除了缺少 GPU、热管数量较少和右侧风扇较小之外，内部空间与 Vision 16 Pro 非常相似。最后一个方面将与我们的性能测量相关。

Vision 16 用户可以更换内存模块、WiFi 模块、M.2 固态硬盘和电池。此外，还有一个免费的第二个 M.2 固态硬盘插槽。

保修

全球国际货运提供 24 个月的基本保修服务，其中包括取货和退货服务以及前六个月的快速维修服务。您还可以选择 36 个月的保修期，并通过各种保修套餐（如整个保修期内的快速维修）来扩展保修期。

输入设备--巨大的玻璃点击板，但键盘布局不够理想。

Vision 16 的输入设备非常可靠。触摸板非常大且精确，但键盘方面还存在一些不足。

键盘

键盘上有一个带有全尺寸方向键的专用数字键区，缩短了右侧 Shift 键的长度，取代了数字键区的额外回车键。该数字键区是一个相当压缩的版本，不太适合快速输入数字。这不禁让人产生疑问，为什么申克要加入数字键区，因为整个键盘都因此向左移动了。由于键盘左移，右边的 Shift 键变短，打字受到了负面影响，需要较长的时间来适应键盘。

就按键本身而言，它提供了非常良好和精确的键入感，键入噪音不大，但很扎实。键盘有两级背光亮度，所有按键光线均匀。

触摸板

Vision 16 和专业版的一大亮点是超大玻璃触控板（15.4 x 10 厘米）。使用触控板非常简单，由于表面较大，手势和光标移动都很流畅。触摸板的精度非常好。不过，点击机构的噪音可能会稍小一些，而且点击右键区域可能会比较麻烦。

显示屏 - 240 Hz IPS 屏幕，16:10 格式

Vision 16 2023 超极本的亮点之一是采用了全新的 WQXGA 面板（2,560 x 1,600），这是去年 Pro 版本所独有的。今年 Vision 16 的刷新率不再是 90 Hz，而是 240 Hz，这在办公笔记本电脑中并不多见。

尽管今年 Vision 16 的两个版本都使用了相同的屏幕，但在我们的评测中，Vision 16 的表现略微优于 Vision 16 Pro。我们将这些差异归因于面板之间的正常质量差异。根据申克公司的说法，屏幕亮度应达到 350 cd/m²，我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。

240 Hz 的高频率带来了流畅的用户体验。不过，除非与外置 Thunderbolt GPU 结合使用，否则 Vision 16 在游戏中的流畅性优势就会付诸东流。


348 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	341 cd/m²
345 cd/m²	356 cd/m²	342 cd/m²
342 cd/m²	366 cd/m²	359 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 349.1 cd/m² Minimum: 17.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 356 cd/m²
Contrast: 1271:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 , IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Samsung ATNA56YX08-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U LQ150P1JX51, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Samsung SDC4161, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		22%	28%	27%	-2%	27%
Display P3 Coverage	70	98.7 41%	99.91 43%	99.8 43%	68.1 -3%	99.9 43%
sRGB Coverage	99.3	99.9 1%	100 1%	100 1%	97.3 -2%	100 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	71.2	87.9 23%	98.87 39%	98.09 38%	70.3 -1%	98.6 38%
Response Times		-149%	79%	79%	-318%	84%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	11 ?(5, 6)	28.8 ?(14.2, 14.6) -162%	2 ?(1, 1) 82%	2 ?(1, 1) 82%	52.4 ?(24.4, 28) -376%	0.74 93%
Response Time Black / White *	8 ?(4, 4)	18.9 ?(8.5, 10.4) -136%	2 ?(1, 1) 75%	2 ?(1, 1) 75%	28.7 ?(13, 15.7) -259%	2 ?(1, 1) 75%
PWM Frequency			227 ?(50)		22000 ?(50)	59 ?(50)
Screen		9%	-52%	-20%	18%	-36%
Brightness middle	356	517 45%	370 4%	395 11%	397 12%	378 6%
Brightness	349	501 44%	371 6%	392 12%	399 14%	378 8%
Brightness Distribution	93	93 0%	98 5%	97 4%	85 -9%	98 5%
Black Level *	0.28	0.39 -39%		0.1 64%	0.29 -4%
Contrast	1271	1326 4%		3950 211%	1369 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.7	1.2 29%	2.77 -63%	2.2 -29%	0.8 53%	2.2 -29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3	2.5 17%	4.08 -36%	4.43 -48%	1.4 53%	4.87 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1	0.8 20%	2.83 -183%	4.65 -365%		2.68 -168%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.3	1.8 -38%	2.58 -98%	1.78 -37%	1.1 15%	1.43 -10%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.24 ^98%	2.46 ^89%	2.39 ^92%	2.18 ^101%	2.47 ^89%
CCT	6625 ^98%		6241 ^104%	6284 ^103%	6705 ^97%	6464 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-39% / -11%	18% / -10%	29% / 4%	-101% / -38%	25% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

黑色值的测量结果为 0.28 cd/m²，屏幕对比度超过 1,200:1。尽管如此，IPS 显示屏仍无法与 OLED 面板的深黑色值相媲美。

在校准之前，屏幕的 deltaE 值为 1.7，我们可以将其降低到 1.0。相比之下，Vision 16 Pro 的显示屏在校准前的 deltaE 值为 3.4。灰度方面的差异尤为明显。出厂时，Pro 版本的灰阶 deltaE 为 4.9，而我们的 Vision 16 评测样本的灰阶 deltaE 低得多，仅为 1.3。

在 Vision 16 Pro 的屏幕上，我们没有发现类似的蓝色色调。由于出厂校准效果良好，我们没有在控制中心使用申克色彩配置文件。Vision 16 和 Vision 16 Pro 在测量结果上的差异表明，屏幕的质量是幸运的。与往常一样，我们为申克 Vision 16 创建的色彩配置文件可在上面的灰色框中免费下载。

由于屏幕几乎完全覆盖了 sRGB 色域，Vision 16 2023 适合进行简单的照片编辑。对于专业摄影师或摄像师来说，这块屏幕还不够好，因为更宽的 AdobeRGB 和 DCI P3 色域覆盖不足。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于采用了哑光屏幕，Vision 16 可以在户外环境中使用。但应避免阳光直射，否则会影响工作效率。

视角稳定性不错，但还达不到 OLED 屏幕的水平。从极端角度观看时，显示屏会失去对比度。

性能 - 酷睿 i7-13700H 无法满负荷运行

而不是去年的英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H.Vision16的新机型提供了更新的英特尔酷睿 i7-13700H.虽然前代机型提供了 RTX 3050 Ti，但今年的机型只包含英特尔处理器的集成 GPU。此外，32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD 也是软件包的一部分。

测试条件

全球国际货运公司在控制中心应用程序中提供多种配置文件，但不再提供手动配置文件。因此，用户无法更改处理器的 TDP 临界值。所有性能基准测试均在 TDP 为 45 W 的 "发烧友 "模式下进行。在申克控制中心应用程序的 "安静 "模式下，TDP 固定为 15 W。

	发烧级	平衡型	静音型
CPU PL1 (HWInfo)	45 瓦	45 瓦	15 瓦
CPU PL2 (HWInfo)	45 瓦	45 瓦	15 瓦

处理器

在 Vision 16 中，相同的酷睿 i7-13700H采用了与 Vision 16 Pro 相同的英特尔猛禽湖一代酷睿 i7-13700H。由于功耗相当有限，温度保持在较低水平，但性能受到了影响，处理器的运行速度与 Vision 16 Pro.在 Cinebench R15 循环中，Vision 16 的多核性能比 Vision 16 Pro 差了约 15%。我们将这一较低的结果归因于 Vision 16 较差的冷却系统。由于我们在 Cinebench 循环中测得的温度较低，仅为 62 度，因此处理器确实有更高的性能表现空间。在电池模式下，CPU 的功耗被限制在 35 W，这使得多核性能降低了 20%。

Cinebench R15 Multi sustained loop

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1807 (1727.64-1846.81)

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2: Ø1063 (973.83-1209.85)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1906 (1816.37-2350.45)

LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1284 (755.32-1642.37)

Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1257 (1212.27-1577.22)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø1970 (1926.5-2121.45)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	83.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H	82.6 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	82 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	77 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	72.2 pt
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	65.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	62 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB ^-5! Apple M2	60.4 pt
Average of class Office	58.8 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28)	15266 Points +27%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	14760 Points +23%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	14099 Points +17%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	12570 Points +4%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	12035 Points
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	9494 Points -21%
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=96, last 2 years)	9316 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	8930 Points -26%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	8569 Points -29%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	1891 Points +1%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	1885 Points +1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	1870 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28)	1797 Points -4%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	1760 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1673 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	1589 Points -15%
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=96, last 2 years)	1559 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1547 Points -17%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28)	5945 Points +28%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	5672 Points +22%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	5310 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	4839 Points +4%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	4650 Points
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=96, last 2 years)	3584 Points -23%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	3515 Points -24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	3440 Points -26%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	2324 Points -50%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	729 Points +1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	720 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	719 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28)	693 Points -4%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	669 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	644 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	603 Points -16%
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=96, last 2 years)	600 Points -17%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	431 Points -40%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28)	2455 Points +33%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	2350 (1816.37^min - 2350.45^max) Points +27%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	2253 (2076.41^min - 2253.14^max) Points +22%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2121 (1926.5^min - 2121.45^max) Points +15%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	1847 (1727.64^min - 1846.81^max) Points
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	1642 Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1577 (1212.27^min - 1577.22^max) Points -15%
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=97, last 2 years)	1575 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	1209.9 (973.83^min, 974.802^P1 - 1209.85^max) Points -34%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	276 Points +3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	267 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	260 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28)	260 Points -3%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	249 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	243 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	239 Points -10%
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=96, last 2 years)	231 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	222 Points -17%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	597 Seconds * -140%
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=97, last 2 years)	415 Seconds * -67%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	383 Seconds * -54%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	352 Seconds * -41%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	255 Seconds * -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	252 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	249 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28)	229 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	223 Seconds * +10%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	61921 MIPS +24%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28)	61025 MIPS +22%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	56351 MIPS +13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	54857 MIPS +10%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	50083 MIPS
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=97, last 2 years)	39123 MIPS -22%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	38283 MIPS -24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	37065 MIPS -26%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	6224 MIPS +2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	6148 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	6108 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28)	5858 MIPS -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5748 MIPS -6%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	5368 MIPS -12%
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=97, last 2 years)	5271 MIPS -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	5256 MIPS -14%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	11831 Points +31%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	11808 Points +31%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28)	11777 Points +31%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	9967 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	9263 Points +3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	8997 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	8961 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	8770 Points -3%
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=96, last 2 years)	7635 Points -15%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	1917 Points +5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	1885 Points +3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	1861 Points +2%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	1830 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	1828 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28)	1792 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1662 Points -9%
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=97, last 2 years)	1592 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1568 Points -14%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28)	16.7 fps +19%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	16.6 fps +19%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	15.7 fps +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	15.4 fps +10%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	14 fps
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	10.8 fps -23%
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=95, last 2 years)	10.5 fps -25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	10.1 fps -28%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=95, last 2 years)	53.3 s * -70%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	50.2 s * -60%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28)	48.2 s * -54%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	47.6 s * -52%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	45.9 s * -47%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	45 s * -44%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	40.7 s * -30%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	31.3 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=94, last 2 years)	0.546 sec * -21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	0.4969 sec * -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.495 sec * -10%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	0.4895 sec * -8%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28)	0.4651 sec * -3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4513 sec *
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4426 sec * +2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	0.434 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1847 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

98.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

267 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4650 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

719 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

12035 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1870 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	93.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H	87 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	83 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	73.6 pt
Average of class Office	60.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54.2 pt
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	49.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	14093 KRay/s +17%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28)	14011 KRay/s +16%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	13289 KRay/s +10%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	12052 KRay/s
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=96, last 2 years)	9496 KRay/s -21%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7133 KRay/s -41%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7118 KRay/s -41%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	88203 Points +48%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28)	70414 Points +18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66971 Points +12%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59789 Points
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=96, last 2 years)	47957 Points -20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38567 Points -35%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	35309 Points -41%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28)	3272 MB/s +18%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	3085 MB/s +11%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3059 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2779 MB/s
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=96, last 2 years)	2251 MB/s -19%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2010 MB/s -28%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1601 MB/s -42%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	102605 Points +49%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	102497 Points +49%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28)	98096 Points +43%
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=96, last 2 years)	70416 Points +2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68763 Points
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66862 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65810 Points -4%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	12439 Points +83%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28)	8871 Points +30%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8586 Points +26%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6813 Points
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=96, last 2 years)	6730 Points -1%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5132 Points -25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4906 Points -28%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	47989 Points +61%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28)	34551 Points +16%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	33244 Points +12%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29787 Points
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=96, last 2 years)	25037 Points -16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19342 Points -35%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	18336 Points -38%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	124499 MB/s +130%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28)	76444 MB/s +41%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62143 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54223 MB/s
Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=96, last 2 years)	51431 MB/s -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38704 MB/s -29%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32549 MB/s -40%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28)	945 MB/s +21%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	870 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	778 MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	772 MB/s -1%
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=96, last 2 years)	603 MB/s -22%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	593 MB/s -24%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	463 MB/s -40%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28)	7510 KRay/s +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	7452 KRay/s +13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7221 KRay/s +9%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6610 KRay/s
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=96, last 2 years)	5036 KRay/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4072 KRay/s -38%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3868 KRay/s -41%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44397 MPixel/s
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41811 MPixel/s -6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28)	40281 MPixel/s -9%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40107 MPixel/s -10%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38655 MPixel/s -13%
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=96, last 2 years)	29480 MPixel/s -34%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	28346 MPixel/s -36%

系统性能

与宏碁 Swift Go SFG16-71再次表明，Vision 16 的酷睿 i7-13700H 受限于较低的 TDP。该处理器在合成基准测试中的性能略低于平均水平，不过这款超极本的主观性能还是非常不错的。在浏览网页、4K Youtube 视频或同时进行 Office 程序和浏览的多任务处理时，Vision 16 没有显示出任何变慢的迹象。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	6780 Points +23%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6192 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5531 - 6247, n=4)	5914 Points +7%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5819 Points +5%
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=88, last 2 years)	5649 Points +2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5531 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	5472 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11257 Points +13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10937 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9961 - 11401, n=4)	10669 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	10381 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	10155 Points +2%
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=88, last 2 years)	10146 Points +2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9961 Points

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	9603 Points +34%
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=88, last 2 years)	7735 Points +8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7624 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7072 - 7691, n=4)	7394 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	7271 Points +1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7189 Points
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7137 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	8485 Points +32%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7727 Points +20%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6413 - 7727, n=4)	7123 Points +11%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6658 Points +4%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6413 Points
Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=88, last 2 years)	6396 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	6023 Points -6%

CrossMark / Overall
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1868 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1548 - 1868, n=4)	1705 Points +1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1681 Points
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1670 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1590 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1520 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	1497 Points -11%
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=90, last 2 years)	1414 Points -16%

CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1787 Points +7%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1666 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1500 - 1787, n=4)	1658 Points 0%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1634 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1566 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	1460 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1418 Points -15%
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=90, last 2 years)	1410 Points -15%

CrossMark / Creativity
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2009 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1620 - 2009, n=4)	1801 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1777 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1708 Points 0%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1708 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1701 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	1630 Points -4%
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=90, last 2 years)	1474 Points -13%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1715 Points +3%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1666 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1664 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1456 - 1715, n=4)	1580 Points -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1340 Points -19%
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=90, last 2 years)	1276 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	1250 Points -25%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1171 Points -30%

PCMark 10 Score		5531 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64605 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28)	62480 MB/s -3%
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=97, last 2 years)	49873 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69590 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28)	65892 MB/s -5%
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=97, last 2 years)	51060 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28)	68690 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66277 MB/s
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=97, last 2 years)	53904 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=97, last 2 years)	95.6 ns * -13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28)	94.1 ns * -11%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	84.4 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

我们的标准延迟测试（上网、4K Youtube、CPU 负载）显示了一些 DPC 延迟问题。在测试状态下，Vision 16 不能完全用于实时音频，但 BIOS 更新可以解决这个问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2645.7 μs * -67%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1630.9 μs * -3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1589 μs *
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	1061.7 μs * +33%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	515 μs * +68%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

申克 Vision 16 有两个用于固态硬盘的 PCIe 4.0 插槽。我们的评测样本是 1 TB 三星 990 Pro M.2 固态硬盘。DiskSpd 的基准测试结果显示，固态硬盘的读写速度明显不足。AS SSD 的测量结果则更好，速度更符合高性能 SSD 的要求。Vision 16 Pro 的评测样品也使用了同样的三星 990 Pro 固态硬盘，并取得了更好的成绩。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

Sequential Read: 5213MB/s

Sequential Write: 5089MB/s

4K Read: 74.4MB/s

4K Write: 227MB/s

4K-64 Read: 2491MB/s

4K-64 Write: 2958MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.047ms

Access Time Write: 0.017ms

Score Read: 3086Points

Score Write: 3694Points

Score Total: 8355Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	95.8 pt
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	93.7 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	88.5 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	79.3 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	59.7 pt
Average of class Office	50.8 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	48.2 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	36.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2556 - 4234, n=19)	3283 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3077 (2170.13^min - 3076.66^max) MB/s +10%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2902 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2809 (2007.15^min - 2809.34^max) MB/s
Average of class Office (121 - 4554, n=93, last 2 years)	2680 MB/s -5%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2317 (2303.3^min - 2316.74^max) MB/s -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	2220 (2131.96^min - 2220.01^max) MB/s -21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	2000 (1971.95^min - 2000.05^max) MB/s -29%
seq write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5155 (4427.3^min - 5155.43^max) MB/s +38%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4984 (4931.66^min - 4983.98^max) MB/s +33%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3598 - 5842, n=19)	4816 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3737 (3473.72^min - 3737.12^max) MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3058 (2997.76^min - 3057.65^max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Office (43 - 5842, n=93, last 2 years)	2624 MB/s -30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	2252 (2195.31^min - 2252.34^max) MB/s -40%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1923 (1820.33^min - 1922.81^max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7121 (6367.95^min - 7120.69^max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7029 (5920.36^min - 7029.02^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4958 - 7148, n=19)	6979 MB/s -1%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6622 (5519.07^min - 6621.55^max) MB/s -6%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4513 (3871.13^min - 4512.65^max) MB/s -36%
Average of class Office (124.2 - 7120, n=93, last 2 years)	4428 MB/s -37%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	3595 (2871^min - 3595.09^max) MB/s -49%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	3491 (2839.96^min - 3491.07^max) MB/s -50%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6531 - 6898, n=19)	6796 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6761 (6735.84^min - 6761.33^max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6531 (6403.25^min - 6531.43^max) MB/s
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6111 (6068.11^min - 6111.31^max) MB/s -6%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3574 (3515.97^min - 3573.95^max) MB/s -45%
Average of class Office (46.7 - 6791, n=93, last 2 years)	3432 MB/s -47%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	2435 (2388.07^min - 2435^max) MB/s -63%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1956 (1934.83^min - 1956.01^max) MB/s -70%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	83.7 (81.88^min - 83.66^max) MB/s +10%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	78.6 (78.34^min - 78.55^max) MB/s +3%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (55.3 - 99, n=19)	77.1 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	76.4 (75.41^min - 76.43^max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	66.4 (65.04^min - 66.4^max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Office (5.55 - 89.9, n=93, last 2 years)	58.6 MB/s -23%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	47 (39.82^min - 46.98^max) MB/s -38%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	37.1 (36.31^min - 37.14^max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	280 (271.67^min - 280.35^max) MB/s +45%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	277 (271.48^min - 277.03^max) MB/s +43%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	267 (266.37^min - 267.43^max) MB/s +38%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (133.9 - 343, n=19)	235 MB/s +21%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	193.6 (185.2^min - 193.62^max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	174.7 (144.56^min - 174.67^max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Office (1.23 - 429, n=93, last 2 years)	166.5 MB/s -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	124.4 (122.26^min - 124.38^max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4425 (3320.82^min - 4425.19^max) MB/s +401%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4358 (4325.31^min - 4358.41^max) MB/s +394%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (818 - 4926, n=19)	3398 MB/s +285%
Average of class Office (7.49 - 4425, n=93, last 2 years)	1293 MB/s +46%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1282 (1164.42^min - 1282.42^max) MB/s +45%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1171 (1165.75^min - 1170.99^max) MB/s +33%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	883 (879.59^min - 883.12^max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	625 (608.85^min - 624.55^max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3090 (3060.74^min - 3090.41^max) MB/s +272%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (413 - 4683, n=19)	2584 MB/s +211%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2545 (2396.15^min - 2545.25^max) MB/s +206%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2194 (1844.86^min - 2194.33^max) MB/s +164%
Average of class Office (1.5 - 3254, n=93, last 2 years)	950 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	831 (820.69^min - 831.14^max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	407 (388.53^min - 407.32^max) MB/s -51%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	347 (338.26^min - 347.06^max) MB/s -58%

AS SSD
Score Total
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9204 Points +10%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9172 Points +10%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8355 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (5405 - 10591, n=19)	8285 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6406 Points -23%
Average of class Office (704 - 9204, n=90, last 2 years)	4271 Points -49%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	3626 Points -57%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	3381 Points -60%
Score Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3369 Points +9%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3364 Points +9%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3086 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1349 - 4721, n=19)	2874 Points -7%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2413 Points -22%
Average of class Office (252 - 3364, n=90, last 2 years)	1502 Points -51%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1136 Points -63%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	1028 Points -67%
Score Write
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4111 Points +11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4082 Points +11%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2308 - 4852, n=19)	4041 Points +9%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3694 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2796 Points -24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	2104 Points -43%
Average of class Office (247 - 4111, n=90, last 2 years)	2042 Points -45%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1747 Points -53%
Seq Read
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5728.69 MB/s +10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4362 - 5760, n=19)	5223 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5213 MB/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5128 MB/s -2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3940.4 MB/s -24%
Average of class Office (508 - 5796, n=90, last 2 years)	3491 MB/s -33%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	2889 MB/s -45%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	2831 MB/s -46%
Seq Write
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5879.9 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5101 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5089 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3376 - 5651, n=19)	4740 MB/s -7%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3155.67 MB/s -38%
Average of class Office (294 - 5880, n=90, last 2 years)	2402 MB/s -53%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	1884 MB/s -63%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1092 MB/s -79%
4K Read
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	77.67 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	75.8 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	74.4 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)	71.9 MB/s -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	61.2 MB/s -18%
Average of class Office (18 - 91.1, n=90, last 2 years)	58.5 MB/s -21%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	58.13 MB/s -22%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	35.43 MB/s -52%
4K Write
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	243.64 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	231 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	227 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	224.86 MB/s -1%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (172.3 - 306, n=19)	221 MB/s -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	175.8 MB/s -23%
Average of class Office (28.2 - 350, n=90, last 2 years)	168.3 MB/s -26%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	115.95 MB/s -49%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2780 MB/s +12%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2713.32 MB/s +9%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2491 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (787 - 3182, n=19)	2235 MB/s -10%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1961.03 MB/s -21%
Average of class Office (182.3 - 2713, n=90, last 2 years)	1095 MB/s -56%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	817 MB/s -67%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	678 MB/s -73%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1592 - 4090, n=19)	3352 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3341 MB/s +13%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3279.73 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2958 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2255.47 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	1740 MB/s -41%
Average of class Office (183.4 - 3394, n=90, last 2 years)	1634 MB/s -45%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1522 MB/s -49%
Access Time Read
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	0.083 ms * -77%
Average of class Office (0.022 - 0.302, n=90, last 2 years)	0.07814 ms * -66%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.074 ms * -57%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.047 ms *
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.039 ms * +17%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)	0.03384 ms * +28%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	0.027 ms * +43%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms * +62%
Access Time Write
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.136 ms * -700%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	0.132 ms * -676%
Average of class Office (0.016 - 0.625, n=90, last 2 years)	0.06748 ms * -297%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	0.028 ms * -65%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)	0.01995 ms * -17%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms *
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.017 ms * -0%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø6921 (5693.08-7086.78)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4432 (3774.46-4479.31)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G: Ø3601 (2999.77-3614.76)

SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7104 (6436.24-7126.32)

图形卡

2022 年的 Vision 16 配备了 RTX 3050。今年的机型只集成了英特尔 Iris Xe Graphics G7，有 96 个 EU。日常工作没问题，但不适合游戏。在合成基准测试中，iGPU 的性能至少比 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 的平均性能高出 11%。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	100 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	41.7 pt
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	28.7 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	28.1 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	27.7 pt
Average of class Office	27.3 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U ^-1! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	15.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	40870 Points +479%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	9772 Points +39%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	7243 Points +3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	7055 Points
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=92, last 2 years)	6792 Points -4%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	6733 Points -5%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202)	6353 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	6211 Points -12%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	43225 Points +64%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	29645 Points +13%
Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=66, last 2 years)	26751 Points +2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13162 - 38578, n=180)	26508 Points +1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	26298 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	25452 Points -3%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	29801 Points +412%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6661 Points +14%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	5820 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	5610 Points -4%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5367 Points -8%
Average of class Office (1089 - 21732, n=93, last 2 years)	5061 Points -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	5015 Points -14%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6482, n=215)	4920 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11496 Points +570%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2373 Points +38%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	1787 Points +4%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	1715 Points
Average of class Office (313 - 4109, n=93, last 2 years)	1599 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	1581 Points -8%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=212)	1495 Points -13%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1347 Points -21%

3DMark 11 Performance		7613 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21964 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5433 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1953 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Office (343 - 3964, n=93, last 2 years)	764 Seconds * -76%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=101)	696 Seconds * -60%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	435 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

Iris Xe Graphics G7 是英特尔最强的 iGPU，但游戏性能较低。AMD iGPU 如Radeon 680M或 Radeon 780M都更为强大。只要保持较低的分辨率和图形设置，老游戏仍然可以玩。如果没有外置 GPU（可通过 Thunderbolt 4 连接），240 Hz 的屏幕仍然会被浪费。

Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB ^-5! Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	100 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	90.7 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	77.5 pt
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) ^-1! Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	75.1 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	70.6 pt
Average of class Office	68.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	64.5 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	28 fps +47%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	24 fps +26%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	19 fps
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.3 fps -9%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15.1 (12^min) fps -21%
Average of class Office (3.8 - 34, n=79, last 2 years)	14.8 fps -22%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.4 (11^min, 11^P1) fps -35%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	20.6 (5.54^min, 14.5^P1) fps +98%
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=82, last 2 years)	12.9 fps +24%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.9 (2.26^min, 6.17^P1) fps +5%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.4 fps
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.87 (4.82^min, 6.9^P1) fps -5%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	22.4 fps +24%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18 fps
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.7 fps -2%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.5 fps -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.4 fps -9%
Average of class Office (3.86 - 35.7, n=91, last 2 years)	16 fps -11%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	39.2 (18.3^min, 25^P1) fps +56%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.7 (5.6^min, 9.49^P1) fps +14%
Average of class Office (9.6 - 56.5, n=74, last 2 years)	27 fps +8%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.1 (5^min, 6.46^P1) fps
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.3 (5^min, 8.18^P1) fps -3%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.3 (5^min, 6.49^P1) fps -3%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	61.7 (53.9^min) fps +18%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	58.1 (47.8^min) fps +11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	55.2 (46.5^min) fps +5%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	52.4 (45.3^min) fps
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	50 (41.7^min) fps -5%
Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=98, last 2 years)	51.7 fps -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	36 (34.5^min) fps -31%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	41 fps +28%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.1 fps +25%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.7 fps +18%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	32 fps
Average of class Office (8.88 - 92.6, n=94, last 2 years)	30.2 fps -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.8 fps -10%

Witcher 3 FPS diagramm

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø19 (16-22)

LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø10.2 (8-15)

Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø12.4 (11-14)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M: Ø23.9 (19-25)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	117.4	104.3	24.8	10.4	6.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)	45	35	23	19
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	95.5	70.8	61.3	52.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	44	24	18		12	7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	35	33	32			27
Far Cry 5 (2018)	52	28	26	24	17
Strange Brigade (2018)	81.7	39.7	31.7	25.1
F1 23 (2023)	39.4	35.5	24.8	18.4

排放量

噪音

Vision 16 的排放是可以接受的。空转时，风扇几乎始终运转，在安静的条件下可以听到。在最大负载下，我们测得的噪音为 45 dB(a)，这在大多数应用中都达不到。在日常使用中，风扇更有可能以 33.8 dB(a) 的噪音运行，相当安静。在正常办公使用中，超极本几乎从未保持安静，不过风扇噪音频率较低，不会造成干扰。但对噪音比较敏感的用户还是会感到不舒服。

Noise Level

Idle		25.5 / 28.7 / 29.1 dB(A)
Load		33.8 / 44.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.5 dB(A)

	SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G
Noise		-4%	1%	10%	-17%
off / environment *	25.5	25.7 -1%	25.2 1%	23.3 9%	26 -2%
Idle Minimum *	25.5	26.1 -2%	25.2 1%	23.3 9%	26 -2%
Idle Average *	28.7	26.1 9%	25.2 12%	23.3 19%	26 9%
Idle Maximum *	29.1	27.2 7%	25.2 13%	23.3 20%	28.1 3%
Load Average *	33.8	44.2 -31%	43.1 -28%	35 -4%	56.9 -68%
Witcher 3 ultra *	37.6			38.1 -1%
Load Maximum *	44.9	47.5 -6%	43.3 4%	38.1 15%	62.6 -39%

* ... smaller is better

热量

尽管风扇声音很小，但 Vision 16 仍然保持了相对低的温度。负载情况下，键盘上方热点的掌托温度达到 28.5 摄氏度/83 华氏度。在负载情况下，热点位于键盘中央，温度达到 42 摄氏度/108 华氏度，是一个令人不舒服的温度。但在日常使用中通常不会达到这一最高负载温度。

两个风扇从底部吸入空气并从背面排出。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


32.2 °C	31.9 °C	33.4 °C
26.1 °C	41.1 °C	28.3 °C
24.6 °C	28.2 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 30.2 °C


32.1 °C	32.5 °C	28.9 °C
28.1 °C	42 °C	25 °C
26.1 °C	26.3 °C	24.5 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 29.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.9 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke 62 Max+

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


26.6 °C	28.5 °C	26 °C
24.5 °C	26.4 °C	25.7 °C
24.3 °C	25.1 °C	24.5 °C

Maximum: 28.5 °C
Average: 25.7 °C


25.9 °C	26.8 °C	25.8 °C
25.4 °C	25.9 °C	25.1 °C
24.7 °C	25.1 °C	24.9 °C

Maximum: 26.8 °C
Average: 25.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 23.5 °C | Room Temperature 22.7 °C | Fluke 62 Max+

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


30.7 °C	31 °C	30.5 °C
26.5 °C	35.1 °C	28.5 °C
24.9 °C	27.2 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 35.1 °C
Average: 28.8 °C


28.8 °C	31.2 °C	27.8 °C
26.6 °C	36.5 °C	24.4 °C
25.6 °C	25.2 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 27.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 34.2 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | Fluke 62 Max+

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).

	SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
Heat		1%	-13%	-23%	3%	-21%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.1	45.1 -10%	44.4 -8%	43.9 -7%	44.6 -9%	50.2 -22%
Maximum Bottom *	42	42.5 -1%	48 -14%	50.4 -20%	47.4 -13%	50.2 -20%
Idle Upper Side *	28.5	25.9 9%	31.9 -12%	35.8 -26%	22.6 21%	32.1 -13%
Idle Bottom *	26.8	25.8 4%	31.9 -19%	37.5 -40%	23.3 13%	34.6 -29%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在压力测试（Prime95 和 Furmark）开始时，CPU 频率达到 2.5 GHz，但很快就稳定在 1.6 至 1.7 GHz 之间。在 Witcher 循环测试中，性能在压力测试后期趋于稳定，保持在 1.7 GHz。CPU 的温度保持在较低水平，平均温度为 66 摄氏度/150 华氏度，这可能与低 TDP 有关。

发言人

扬声器系统与 Vision 16 Pro 相同，与前代产品相比没有变化。高音精准，但底音不足。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 作为办公笔记本电脑，耗电量太大

耗电量

对于没有专用图形处理器的超极本来说，空闲时的耗电量明显高于同类设备。功耗较高的原因可能是英特尔的 H 处理器，因为办公笔记本电脑通常使用 U/P CPU。AMD 处理器在这方面更具优势。华硕华硕 VivoBook S15尽管采用了 OLED 显示屏，但由于采用了功耗更低的处理器，因此效率更高。在负载情况下，耗电量趋于正常，有时甚至低于其他笔记本电脑。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Idle	6.3 / 14.4 / 16.2 Watt
Load	46.2 / 85.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Office
Power Consumption		44%	11%	26%	27%	8%	22%	31%
Idle Minimum *	6.3	2.2 65%	5.8 8%	4.2 33%	3.8 40%	4.4 30%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) 15%	4.49 ?(2.2 - 13.8, n=93, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Average *	14.4	10 31%	6 58%	8.9 38%	8.2 43%	5.1 65%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) 41%	7.44 ?(3.8 - 14.9, n=93, last 2 years) 48%
Idle Maximum *	16.2	10.1 38%	6.9 57%	10.3 36%	8.4 48%	9.3 43%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) 33%	9.07 ?(4.89 - 18.6, n=93, last 2 years) 44%
Load Average *	46.2	33.6 27%	59 -28%	47 -2%	50.1 -8%	67 -45%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) 2%	42.7 ?(8.7 - 77.9, n=89, last 2 years) 8%
Witcher 3 ultra *	49.4	27.8 44%	61.1 -24%	43.8 11%	38.8 21%	66.4 -34%
Load Maximum *	85.2	37.2 56%	92 -8%	49 42%	69.6 18%	93.5 -10%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) 21%	61.7 ?(11.1 - 107, n=93, last 2 years) 28%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø49.4 (48.2-70.8)

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø82.6 (79.7-85.2)

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.6 (14-16.4)

Power consumption external monitor

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø76.5 (74-78.1)

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62.6 (43.5-69.1)

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø57.4 (54.4-60.7)

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø41.7 (40.6-44)

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.83 (5.87-11.3)

电池寿命

尽管配备了 80 Wh 的电池，Vision 16 的电池续航时间并不理想。在我们的 WiFi 测试中，屏幕亮度为 150 cd/m²，笔记本电脑的续航时间几乎正好为 8 小时。对于一款办公笔记本电脑来说，H 处理器实在是太耗电了。与配备 RTX 4070 的 Vision 16 pro 相比，去掉专用 GPU 的 Vision 16 在电池续航时间方面没有任何优势。

在 WiFi 脚本最大亮度下，Vision 16 的电池续航时间进一步缩短至 6 小时 30 分钟。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		7h 59min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		8h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 35min

	SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 65 Wh	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh	Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.4 Wh	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, 70 Wh	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Average of class Office
Battery Runtime		67%	-12%	40%	-2%	-9%	-27%	2%
WiFi v1.3	479	993 107%	467.7 -2%	749 56%	517 8%	692 44%	467 -3%	612 ?(300 - 1349, n=94, last 2 years) 28%
Load	155	197 27%	121 -22%	190 23%	138 -11%	59 -62%	77 -50%	117.8 ?(56 - 218, n=56, last 2 years) -24%
H.264		1005		880	584	766	470	728 ?(348 - 1501, n=33, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle				1651				1300 ?(527 - 2296, n=16, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 轻巧坚固的镁合金机箱

+ 哑光 WQHD 面板，240 Hz，无 PWM

+ 包括 TB4 在内的众多端口

+ 2x SO-DIMM 和 2x M.2 2280

+ 大型触摸板

Cons

- 软盘铰链

- 不支持 WiFi 6E

- 读卡器速度慢

- 低 TDP 限制了 CPU

- 固态硬盘问题

评语：Vision 16 拥有丰富的端口选择，但处理器性能有限

今年的 Vision 16 配备了最新的英特尔 Raptor Lake CPU、改进的冷却系统和更快的 240 Hz 屏幕。处理器的 TDP 限制在 45 W，从而保持了较低的温度。不过，这也限制了英特尔 H 处理器的性能。Vision 16 的机身由镁合金制成，质感上乘。这使得这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑的重量仅为 1.5 千克，在同类产品中属于轻量级。

与以往型号不同的是，TDP 不再由用户在申克控制中心进行控制。由于 CPU 在压力测试（Prime95 和 FurMark）中只能达到 70 摄氏度，该设备可能会有更好的表现。可定制的 TDP 可以带来更好的性能。

除键盘中心区域外，Vision 16 的散热效果相当不错。即使在负载情况下，风扇噪音也是可以承受的。不过，风扇几乎从未保持真正的安静，即使在空转时也总是以较低的噪音运行。考虑到低 TDP 对英特尔 H 芯片的限制，P/U 系列 CPU 可能更适合 Vision 16。酷睿 i7-13700H 在功耗方面存在劣势，因此申克 16 的功耗高于同类竞争对手。

在评测中，我们还发现了内部 M.2 固态硬盘和 SD 读卡器的问题。两者在速度上都存在缺陷。

尽管机身轻薄，但申克 Vision 16 的性能、端口选择和可升级性都达到了很好的水平。

新的哑光 IPS 显示屏有了明显改善，校准效果很好，甚至在我们自己校准之前就已经校准好了，非常适合简单的照片编辑。对于办公笔记本电脑来说，240 Hz 的刷新率并不常见。它创造了流畅的用户体验，但笔记本电脑的游戏功能不够强大，浪费了面板的部分潜力。该面板没有覆盖更广的色域，也不支持 HDR，但没有 PWM。

作为申克 Vision 16 的替代产品，Vision 16 Pro 是一个更强大的变体，尽管处理器相同，但 CPU 速度更快，还可选配 RTX 4070 CPU。Acer Swift Go 16 使用相同的处理器，但允许更高的 TDP（80 瓦）。此外，Acer 还使用 OLED 屏幕。不过，这两款产品都没有 Vision 16 重量轻。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

定价和可用性

新款 Vision 16 2023 在德国 Bestware 有售，起价 1424 欧元。我们的评测配置为 32 GB 内存和 1 TB M.2 Samsung 990 Pro SSD，价格为 1,661 欧元。

SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 - 08/30/2023 v7 ^(old)
Philip Macdonald

Chassis

87 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

70 / 80 → 87%

Weight

69 / 20-75 → 89%

Battery

80%

Display

91%

Games Performance

66 / 78 → 84%

Application Performance

95 / 95 → 100%

Temperature

93%

Noise

86%

Audio

77%

Camera

38 / 85 → 45%

Average

80%

89%

Office - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.