宏碁Swift Go 16评论:拥有耀眼的OLED显示屏的多媒体笔记本电脑
纤细、轻巧、加倍酷是宏碁对Swift Go 16的宣传方式。从名字上可以看出,这款笔记本电脑配备了16英寸的屏幕。这家台湾制造商创造了一款适合家庭办公的高端笔记本电脑,拥有大型OLED显示屏、良好的连接性和铝制外壳。到目前为止,这款笔记本电脑已经有了一个 英特尔酷睿i7-13700H或 英特尔酷睿i5-1335U和16GB的内存。客户还可以选择银色或钢灰色,在颜色和硬盘尺寸方面分别选择512GB或1TB兆字节。
我们的测试设备采用时尚的钢灰色,配备较大的存储配置和Core i7。在我们的测试中,这款笔记本电脑证明了它的大部分功能,但它有强大的竞争对手,特别是 华为MateBook 16s有着极其强大的 英特尔酷睿i9-13900H。这两款笔记本电脑在尺寸和重量上非常相似,但有不同的焦点。其他有趣的笔记本电脑有 三星Galaxy Book3 Pro,以及 联想Yoga Slim 7或稍大的 LG Gram 17。每种设备都有自己的优势和劣势。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.7 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 17.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1680 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.4 kg | 17.8 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
80.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 2 kg | 18.7 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 由于采用了铝材,所以重量很轻
宏碁在Swift Go 16中使用了大量的铝,这使得它很坚固,并给它一个高质量的外观。较深的钢灰色真正凸显了笔记本电脑的棱角设计。各个部件的制造质量无可挑剔,所以我们没有发现大的或不均匀的缝隙,在使屏幕和底座都受到扭转应力时,也没有发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音。
这款笔记本的16英寸屏幕可以用一只手打开到165°。在这样做的时候,后端的底座稍微抬起,这是为了让空气更好地流动。只有显示屏的盖子在这里显得有点薄弱,在轻微的压力下会明显地屈服。
在尺寸方面,宏碁的笔记本电脑几乎与 华为MateBook 16s,但前者的重量几乎少了400克,总重量约为1.6公斤。这台 LG Gram甚至更轻,而 Galaxy 书3则要瘦得多。
硬件 - 宏碁笔记本电脑,配有强大的1440p网络摄像头
宏碁比许多竞争对手更巧妙地分配了笔记本的几个端口。Swift Go的两侧有16个USB Type-A端口,但也有一个microSD读卡器和一个Kensington锁插槽。两个完全成熟的USB Type-C端口与DisplayPort、PowerDelivery和Thunderbolt 4确保了广泛的扩展可能性。
SD卡阅读器
在使用我们的快速AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考卡的测试下,笔记本电脑的传输速度远远落后于那些仍有存储卡读卡器的对比设备,因为宏碁的读卡器只通过USB 2.0连接。 惠普的EliteBook和 华为的MateBook 16s根本就没有。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 |
通信 - 快速WiFi 6
一个英特尔杀手Wi-Fi模块处理宏碁笔记本电脑的无线网络连接。这在Wi-Fi 6中是可靠和快速的。然而,在我们的测试中,6E网络的传输速度出现明显下降。
网络摄像头 - 宏碁Swift Go的图像质量很好
在1440p的分辨率下,Swift Go 16的网络摄像头提供了强大的图像质量。该摄像头良好的色彩还原性也很突出。即使在没有强烈的环境光的情况下,网络摄像头的图像仍然是相当有说服力的。
安全性 - 机上的指纹扫描仪
有一个指纹扫描仪和一个肯辛顿锁插槽,以保护我们的测试设备免受未经授权的访问。此外,还有英特尔的酷睿i7的安全功能。
辅料
除了大量的信息传单和配套的USB Type-C电源外,宏碁Swift Go 16的盒子里没有其他配件。
维护 - 没有内存和固态硬盘的扩展选项
要进入这台16英寸的笔记本电脑内部,你首先要卸下十颗TX6螺丝。之后,用一个塑料工具可以很容易地撬开底盖。一个好的起点是铰链左右两边的两个短边。只有WLAN模块和NVMe固态硬盘是可以更换的,所以这里没有免费的扩展插槽。除了几颗螺丝外,胶条也将笔记本的电池固定在原位。
保修 - 两年保修
在欧洲,宏碁Swift Go 16有两年的保修期。这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以感兴趣的买家应该在购买前仔细检查。
Input Devices - Keyboard with numpad
键盘
宏碁Swift Go的键程只有0.9毫米,触觉反馈很小,打字的感觉相当松散。至少我们在这里找到了一个NumPad。数字键比背光键盘的其他部分要小一点。
触摸板 - 由环保的OceanGlass制成
12.6 × 8.5厘米,内置的ClickPad大得令人愉快,可对多达五个触摸点作出反应。它的表面是由环保的OceanGlass制成的。来自海洋的塑料垃圾被收集并回收来制造。
显示屏 - 彩色OLED
宏碁Swift Go 16的OLED显示屏的分辨率为3200 × 2000,格式为16:10,这意味着几乎看不到单个像素。由于OLED显示屏的真实黑色,没有照明误差,371cd/m²的明亮屏幕拥有无限高的对比度。此外,该屏幕还通过了Vesa DisplayHDR 500认证。然而,这一优势显然被OLED面板的高反射性表面所拖累。另一方面,光滑的表面也使画面看起来比一些亚光屏更清晰。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 370 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.83
ΔE Greyscale 2.58 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.91% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P ATNA60CL02-0, AMOLED2X, 2880x1800, 16" | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16" | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP EliteBook 865 G9 X160NV42, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -50% | -1% | -25% | -8% | -53% | -19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.91 | 42 -58% | 99.9 0% | 63 -37% | 92.2 -8% | 40 -60% | 71.4 -29% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 62.8 -37% | 100 0% | 94.9 -5% | 98.66 -1% | 57.6 -42% | 99.3 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.87 | 43.5 -56% | 96.5 -2% | 65.1 -34% | 82.98 -16% | 41.3 -58% | 73.2 -26% |
Response Times | -1218% | 52% | -813% | -750% | -1230% | -942% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 31.8 ? -1490% | 0.5 75% | 34 ? -1600% | 22 ? -1000% | 33 ? -1550% | 35.5 ? -1675% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 20.9 ? -945% | 0.5 75% | 17 ? -750% | 12 ? -500% | 20.2 ? -910% | 23.5 ? -1075% |
PWM Frequency | 227 ? | 240 6% | 26 ? -89% | 56.7 -75% | |||
Screen | -87% | 9% | 19% | -15% | -117% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 370 | 279.4 -24% | 408 10% | 448 21% | 391 6% | 392 6% | 865 134% |
Brightness | 371 | 257 -31% | 412 11% | 436 18% | 358 -4% | 371 0% | 771 108% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 81 -17% | 98 0% | 93 -5% | 84 -14% | 89 -9% | 72 -27% |
Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.002 | 0.35 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.3 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.77 | 5.12 -85% | 2.27 18% | 1.6 42% | 3.52 -27% | 7.3 -164% | 2.4 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.08 | 19.42 -376% | 3.53 13% | 4.44 -9% | 6.06 -49% | 20.8 -410% | 5.8 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.83 | 1.84 35% | 2.42 14% | 0.64 77% | 1.43 49% | 5.4 -91% | 1.5 47% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.58 | 5.5 -113% | 2.69 -4% | 2.78 -8% | 4.27 -66% | 6.5 -152% | 3.8 -47% |
Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.22 99% | 2.45 90% | 2.3 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.36 93% | |
CCT | 6241 104% | 6407 101% | 6942 94% | 6582 99% | 7203 90% | 5993 108% | 6922 94% |
Contrast | 1552 | 204000 | 1280 | 1348 | 1568 | 2883 | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 2.43 | ||||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -452% /
-266% | 20% /
17% | -273% /
-183% | -258% /
-136% | -467% /
-287% | -311% /
-207% |
* ... smaller is better
宏碁Swift Go 16几乎完全再现了所有三个基本色彩空间。AdobeRGB色彩空间以98.87%的比例排在后面。
我们在宏碁Swift Go的显示屏上测量到相当适度的色彩偏差,这与ΔΕ3的目标值相差甚远。笔记本电脑在绿色和蓝色调上出现了过冲,这可能会通过进一步的校准得到改善。同时,我们创建的ICC配置文件(可在信息框中下载)提供了改进的灰度再现。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 227 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 227 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 227 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
屏幕的亮度足以在户外使用时达到良好的可读性。然而,根据与太阳或其他明亮光源的角度,反射会强烈影响屏幕的可读性。
正如OLED显示屏的典型情况,宏碁Swift Go 16的屏幕允许非常陡峭的视角。然而,在非常陡峭的视角下,可感知的亮度也会下降。
性能 - 宏碁部署了英特尔酷睿i7-13700H
我们的测试设备配备了英特尔酷睿i7-13700H和16GB的内存。这款笔记本没有DGPU。因此, Intel Iris Xe mit 96 EUs的i7处理所有图形任务。因此,对于多媒体笔记本电脑来说,宏碁Swift Go是合适的装备。
性能控制和测试条件
Acer Swift Go 16有三个性能计划。与大多数宏碁笔记本电脑一样,这些都是通过FN+F组合键访问的。在这里,你会发现安静、平衡 和性能 模式,它们都以各自的方式影响处理器的冷却和性能。在性能 模式下,i7的提升功率(PL2)约为80瓦。尽管这里指定了82瓦,但我们无法在任何测试的生成日志中证明这个数值。在其他两种工作模式下,PL2约为64瓦,经常略微超过。平衡 和性能 模式以45瓦的连续电源(PL1)开始。然而,在平衡 模式下,在满负荷工作约6分钟后,该值被重新调整为35瓦特。处理器随后保持这一数值。在安静模式下,持续供应从最初的35瓦下降到20瓦。
我们决定在平衡 模式下进行所有的基准测试,尽管性能 模式下明显更高的提升性能可能会使许多基准测试的结果好10%左右。
处理器 - 来自英特尔H系列的强大CPU
的 英特尔酷睿i7-13700H在宏碁Swift Go 16中发挥了作用。猛禽-湖泊-H系列的高端CPU的性能超过了许多其他处理器。特别是P和U系列的i7处理器很难跟上。宏碁Swift Go的提升功率相对较高,在平衡 模式下约为66瓦。因此,该笔记本电脑经常超过所有测试设备的英特尔酷睿i7-13700H的平均值。华为MateBook 16s配备了更强大的 英特尔酷睿i9-13900H更加强大,尽管两个处理器都有六个性能核心和八个效率核心。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 |
系统性能--高档笔记本电脑的高性能
宏碁的笔记本在PCMark 10和CrossMark的系统性能基准测试中也表现良好。尽管配备dGPU的笔记本电脑在这里应该有明显的优势,但LG Gram 17例如,它并没有真正地充分利用它。因此,在我们的比较中,前四台笔记本电脑处于一个非常狭窄的范围。但宏碁的Swift Go 16和华为的MateBook 16s在CrossMark基准测试中的优势更明显一些,英特尔猛禽湖H系列处理器在这里能够显示其优势。宏碁笔记本电脑是一个强大的全能型产品,除了苛刻的3D图形之外,可以满足大多数要求。有了16GB的内存,最可能成为问题的是处理非常广泛的数据库,如在Adobe Lightroom的图像处理中可能出现。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5531 - 6247, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9961 - 11401, n=4) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=73, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=73, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7072 - 7691, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6413 - 7727, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1548 - 1868, n=4) | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1500 - 1787, n=4) | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1620 - 2009, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1456 - 1715, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6192 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
我们测量的延迟表明,在音频处理等实时应用中可能出现严重问题。至少在播放我们的4K60Hz YouTube测试视频时,没有出现跳帧,因此这里没有问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储 - 具有耐力的快速SSD
拥有一兆字节存储空间的Micron 2400提供了体面的速度,并且还能在Swift Go中长时间保持这些速度。没有出现过热的迹象。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形 - Acer Swift Go仅配备iGPU
集成GPU的英特尔酷睿i7-13700H负责所有图形任务。该 英特尔Iris Xe和96个EUs对大多数任务来说是完全足够的。iGPU甚至可以容忍一点游戏,正如3DMark的基准测试所显示的那样。不幸的是,英特尔的GPU还没有与Nvidia或AMD显卡一样的程序接口,这意味着它们不能用于某些程序的GPU加速。带有dGPU的设备,如 LG的Gram 17,承诺会有更多的图形性能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7865 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 68518 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21582 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5215 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2038 points | |
Help |
游戏性能--即使是当前的标题也可以播放
只要你在游戏中坚持使用低质量或中等质量的设置,就可以了。Intel Iris Xe mit 96 EUs理论上可以跟上96 EUs的速度。这样,你至少应该在全高清分辨率下达到可玩的帧率。该显卡只能在对图形要求不高的旧游戏中提供更多的服务。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 113.4 | 26.1 | 10.9 | 0 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 67.2 | 23.1 | 17.3 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 117.9 | 87 | 68.7 | 61.7 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 25.2 | 17.7 | 13.4 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 63.1 | 46.3 | 40.1 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 102.3 | 45.4 | 35.5 | 28.7 | 20.6 |
F1 22 (2022) | 53.1 | 46.7 | 34 | 25.7 |
Emissions - Not really twice as cool
噪音 - 性能模式下的不愉快的音量
宏碁Swift Go 16的两个风扇在正常运行时,在网上冲浪或轻度办公任务中通常非常安静,甚至无声。然而,在要求较高的任务中,风扇会全速运行。根据我们在15厘米距离的测量,噪音水平攀升至47.5分贝(A),导致令人不快的高频率。
作为宏碁笔记本电脑的一个特殊功能,两个风扇还可以通过键盘吸入空气。在我们的热图像中,回车键上方的一个冷点表明了这一点。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26.1 / 26.1 / 27.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.2 / 47.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A) |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01 | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 Vega 8, R7 7730U, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | 5% | -2% | -6% | 9% | 19% | |
off / environment * | 25.7 | 22.8 11% | 26 -1% | 25.7 -0% | 26 -1% | 24.2 6% | 23 11% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.1 | 22.9 12% | 26 -0% | 25.7 2% | 28 -7% | 24.2 7% | 23 12% |
Idle Average * | 26.1 | 22.9 12% | 26 -0% | 28.4 -9% | 28 -7% | 24.2 7% | 23 12% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.2 | 26.9 1% | 27 1% | 28.4 -4% | 28.8 -6% | 28.7 -6% | 23 15% |
Load Average * | 44.2 | 41.7 6% | 39.7 10% | 45.3 -2% | 49.3 -12% | 33.1 25% | 29.1 34% |
Load Maximum * | 47.5 | 43.6 8% | 39.5 17% | 45.6 4% | 49.1 -3% | 41.8 12% | 32.9 31% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.5 | 41.8 | 29.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度 - 宏碁笔记本电脑会发热
特别是在压力测试中,笔记本的左上方变得非常热,远远超过40℃。甚至左边的掌托也不能说是凉爽的,超过34℃。我们甚至在底部测量到高达48℃的热点。这使得宏碁Swift Go在腿上非常不舒服。因此,宏碁的 "两倍冷却 "的说法在这里并不完全准确。即使在PCMark 10基准测试中,尽管有中等负荷,但笔记本在键盘上的温度达到了39℃以上。OLED显示屏的耐温性在较长的负载情况下也会起作用,因为它直接受到来自笔记本内部风扇的热空气的影响。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.1 °C / 93.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.3 °C / -9.6 F).
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | 10% | 4% | 3% | 7% | 16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.4 | 37.6 15% | 43.1 3% | 43.2 3% | 50.3 -13% | 51.4 -16% | 39.4 11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 40 17% | 44.4 7% | 44.7 7% | 52.5 -9% | 47.8 -0% | 47.6 1% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.9 | 30.4 5% | 27.6 13% | 32.1 -1% | 26.9 16% | 24.8 22% | 23.6 26% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.9 | 30.6 4% | 27.1 15% | 30.1 6% | 26.5 17% | 24.9 22% | 24.1 24% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在Prime95和Furmark压力测试中,宏碁Swift Go在整个一小时的测试中几乎能够在性能 模式下保持其性能率。虽然在整个一小时的测试时间内保持了约1.7GHz的平均有效时钟,但在大约30分钟后,GPU时钟略微下降了约50MHz。正如评论中前面提到的(在 "机箱 "一节中),更宽的开放式屏幕确保了基本单元下更好的空气流通。一小时后,屏幕从140°倾斜到90°,继续进行压力测试。结果,平均核心温度从84℃上升到96℃左右。GPU时钟又下降了50MHz。
发言人
宏碁Swift Go的两个扬声器提供了从中音到高音的相当平衡的音质。低音是可以听到的,但并不像华为MateBook 16s那样浑浊。在最大音量为81 dB(A)的情况下,宏碁的笔记本是相当响亮的,可以清楚地淹没自己的风扇。外部扬声器或耳机可以通过蓝牙或3.5毫米插孔连接。
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 小型电池
消耗功率 - 在空闲模式下很经济
Acer Swift Go 16不是特别耗能。闲置时,耗电量通常远低于平均水平。在负载情况下,情况就不同了:由于它的高计算能力,它也要吸取相应的能量。在我们的测试中,笔记本在负载下的最大功耗约为95瓦。因此,随附的100瓦USB-PD电源的尺寸是足够的。
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 1.2 Watt |
Idle | 5.8 / 6 / 6.9 Watt |
Load |
59 / 92 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G, AMOLED2X, 2880x1800, 16" | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 2560x1680, 16" | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 R7 7730U, Vega 8, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | -15% | -28% | -8% | -14% | -22% | -8% | -50% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.8 | 3.3 43% | 6.4 -10% | 5.8 -0% | 4.1 29% | 5.4 7% | 5.3 9% | 5.34 ? 8% | 6.77 ? -17% |
Idle Average * | 6 | 10.2 -70% | 7.7 -28% | 7.7 -28% | 9.8 -63% | 11.1 -85% | 12.8 -113% | 8.55 ? -43% | 11.3 ? -88% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 10.3 -49% | 15.2 -120% | 10.6 -54% | 12 -74% | 11.6 -68% | 14.1 -104% | 10.8 ? -57% | 13.4 ? -94% |
Load Average * | 59 | 55.2 6% | 52.7 11% | 76.9 -30% | 49.3 16% | 52.7 11% | 48.5 18% | 45.3 ? 23% | 71.3 ? -21% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 61.1 | 43.8 28% | 46 25% | 76.7 -26% | 49.3 19% | 47.6 22% | 48.7 20% | ||
Load Maximum * | 92 | 65.7 29% | 63 32% | 118 -28% | 66 28% | 67 27% | 56.6 38% | 67.5 ? 27% | 118.1 ? -28% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命 - 大型笔记本电脑的小电池
我们测试设备的电池容量为65Wh。在我们的16英寸屏幕的对比设备中,只有联想IdeaPad Flex 5有一个较小的电池。然而,由于后者配备了AMD Ryzen处理器,在空闲时效率更高,宏碁Swift Go在WiFi网上冲浪测试中的电池运行时间只能排在最后。尽管如此,7小时47分钟的运行时间仍然相当不错。因此,这款笔记本电脑应该也适合在远离电源插座的地方进行几个小时的流媒体。
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 76 Wh | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 84 Wh | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 90 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 R7 7730U, Vega 8, 52.5 Wh | HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 76 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 12% | 6% | 43% | 47% | -10% | 40% | 7% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 467.7 | 566 21% | 579 24% | 787 68% | 872 86% | 585 25% | 899 92% | 624 ? 33% |
Load | 121 | 124 2% | 105 -13% | 142 17% | 129 7% | 66 -45% | 106 -12% | 97.8 ? -19% |
Reader / Idle | 1138 | 1433 | 1168 ? | |||||
H.264 | 783 | 1112 | 821 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语--广告承诺没有兑现,但仍然不错
配备16英寸屏幕的多媒体笔记本电脑现在有多种配置和价格范围。宏碁Swift Go 16以出色的OLED显示屏、强大的英特尔酷睿i7-13700H和普遍良好的硬件给人留下深刻印象。笔记本电脑上的端口数量和位置都很好,QHD网络摄像头也是如此。然而,在这样一台大的笔记本电脑上有一个相应的大电池将是理想的。65瓦特在这里有点微不足道,因此不能使电池寿命突出。关于宏碁Swift Go的广告承诺,我们不得不说,这款笔记本电脑虽然相对较轻,但既不薄,也没有两倍的温度。低重量是以相当小的电池为代价的。
宏碁Swift Go 16配备了一个优秀的OLED显示屏,一个强大的网络摄像头和一个强大的处理器。
特别是与竞争对手相比,就会发现所有设备都专注于某些方面。Acer Swift Go和 三星Galaxy Book3 Pro 360拥有强大的OLED屏幕。而 华为MateBook 16s提供了最好的计算性能,而 LG Gram 17尽管其重量较轻,但具有相对较强的图形性能。笔记本电脑 联想IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR是相对便宜的,起价为512.99美元。然而,在这里,用户必须接受在屏幕和外壳质量方面的重大妥协。因此,如果你正在寻找一台16英寸的笔记本电脑,你会被宠坏的,但有了宏碁Swift Go 16,你至少有一台在许多方面可以说服人的笔记本电脑,起价为749.99美元。
价格和可用性
目前,宏碁Swift Go 16的供应似乎极为有限。最基本的版本(Intel Core i5-1335U| Intel Iris Xe Graphics| 8GB LPDDR5| 512GB Gen 4 SSD)可通过美国亚马逊购买,价格为749.99美元。
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
- 06/21/2023 v7 (old)
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.